Litvinenko and After

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Litvinenko and After VOLUME 2, ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2007 LITVINENKO AND AFTER INSIDE THIS ISSUE: The last couple of months Surrey stockbroker belt in (son of the president have been a busy time for Rus- 2001. Litvinenko had claimed who had himself been LITVINENKO AND sia-watchers. Not for reasons that the Kremlin itself was 1-2 blown up in 2004), had AFTER we would necessarily have behind the bombings of apart- made no secret of their chosen. It certainly meant a lot ment buildings in 1999 that wish to see her out of by Stephen White of media attention – I made led to the invasion of Chech- the way. They aren’t Channel 4 News and Irish ra- nya, and which allowed Putin normally very scrupu- dio, talked to Canadian televi- to ride to victory as a man of lous in how they achieve 2-3 CONFERENCE sion and New Zealand radio, action early the following year. their objectives – Kady- REPORT and did a short piece – the He had certainly done the rov keeps a tiger in his basis for what follows – for the Kremlin no favours. And who, by Anke Schmidt-Felzman home, and his irregulars Sunday Post. Not that I know outside a government scien- have taken to displaying more about Polonium 210 tific laboratory, could hope to the severed heads of than anyone else, but there get hold of Polonium 210? their opponents on were and still are questions But there are other theories. stakes around local vil- PUBLICATIONS 3 about the impact of the poi- Consider, for instance, the lages. If Litvinenko had soning on East-West relations, Chechen scenario. Litvinenko been making progress in A POSTCARD FROM and on the configuration of 4 was investigating the killing of his inquiries, perhaps a LONDON power in the Kremlin. Politkovskaya. The Chechen lot of progress, wouldn’t Russia attracts attention for all authorities, particularly prime they have wanted him CONFERENCE AND 4 sorts of reasons. Some good minister Ramzan Kadyrov out of the way as well? WORKSHOP PLANS ones, like vodka. But also for Continued page 2 other ones. What has been GRADUATE NEWS 4 happening over recent weeks is not a particularly happy ex- PERSONAL 4 ample. The poisoning of Alex- ander Litvinenko followed the ACADEMIC NET- 5 murder of journalist Anna WORKS Politkovskaya at the start of October, and several high- FIELDTRIPS 5 profile killings in the business and banking world. More than PROJECTS 6 a dozen journalists have now lost their lives since Putin GRADUATE PRO- 6 came to power six years ago; GRESS the killers, typically, are never found. PRESENTATIONS 6 Litvinenko can now be added to this grisly list. He was a WHO WE ARE AND 6 friend of Boris Berezovsky, the Above: Alexander Litvinenko (from bbc.co.uk). WHAT WE DO Kremlin’s leading opponent, who fled to political exile in the VOLUME 2, ISSUE 1 Page 2 LITVINENKO AND AFTER Continued from page 1 they find it hard to get hold need to be worried about Moldova, where the unrecog- been obliged to accept of a deadly poison through where Moscow is going. nised Dniester republic has the Kremlin’s direction or sympathisers, or just for The most obvious cause also voted in favour of a un- (in Khodorkovsky’s case) money, in a government for concern is Russia’s ion with Russia? Why, Rus- go to jail. laboratory? new assertiveness on the sians might argue, should Many Russians have international scene, and these small territories be Actually, a murky murder welcomed what we used its use of natural re- denied the right of national is the last thing the Kremlin to call the ‘smack of firm sources as a political self-determination that we wants at the moment. government’. Putin him- weapon. Already, more are so keen about in other They’re trying to clean up self is immensely popular. than a quarter of our oil cases? their international image in Living standards have and gas comes from Rus- all kinds of ways – through Perhaps the biggest worries been rising all round, on sia. How could the West a sort of Russian CNN, for are about the direction of the back of high oil maintain an independent instance, and by inviting travel of the political system prices. But central con- foreign policy if not just Western scholars and jour- itself. As communist rule trol, if it’s taken too far, the supply, but the com- nalists to a country house ended, it seemed Russia was can silence other voices. panies themselves, were near Moscow for an ex- joining the ‘other democra- A government that has no in the hands of a foreign tended opportunity to dis- cies’. But in all kinds of ways risk of exposure in the country – Russia or any- cuss anything they want Putin has strengthened cen- media has less reason to one else? with the Russian president tral control to an extent that be honest, or even com- (very much what Valentina There are other con- might almost seem Soviet. petent. And a court sys- is writing about in her dis- cerns about Russian ac- The regions have been tem that is manipulated sertation). And would they tions in its immediate brought into line. The media, by politicians gives no- have wanted anything of vicinity. They intervened, above all national television, one any guarantee of this kind on the eve of a clumsily and unsuccess- have been taken over directly their personal safety, let summit with the European fully, in Ukraine’s presi- or indirectly by the state. And alone their property. It’s a Union, and a NATO summit dential election. What if businessmen like Mikhail lesson we teach our first that was being held not far they intervened else- Khodorkovsky, who looked year politics students. away, in Riga? where, for instance in as if they might challenge the Perhaps we should be Georgia, where a rebel Kremlin and even seek telling the Russians as So I don’t think the Krem- province has just de- power at the presidential well? lin is behind it; but that clared its wish to leave election in 2008 at which doesn’t mean we don’t Stephen White and join them? Or in Putin must stand down, have CONFERENCE REPORT This autumn, Valentina, the EU and the Katsu, Anke and Stephen “Outsiders”’ – this was attended the UACES Annual Katsu’s first ever confer- Conference, ‘Exchanging ence presentation and he Ideas on Europe’, at the valiantly overcame his University of Limerick, 31 fears and did a brilliant job August – 2 September in presenting his paper 2006. Katsu and Stephen and answering a number both gave papers in the of quite provocative ques- panel on ‘Political Values in tions from the audience! the New Europe’ while Stephen was last in the Valentina and Anke sat at- panel to present his joint tentively in the audience. paper with Julia Koros- They listened to the presen- televa and Ian McAllister tation by Galina Bogutcaia entitled ‘Are Russians of the paper that Galina co- Europeans?’. A ‘special wrote with Anke and Giselle event’ at this panel was Boss. This was followed by the launch of a special Above: from left to right, Sirke Mäkinen, Karolina Pomorska (Loughborough Univer- Katsu’s presentation on issue of Contemporary sity/University of Maastricht), Giselle Bosse (University of Aberystywth), Derek Hutcheson (University College Dublin), Valentina and Anke. ‘Participation and Protest in Politics (Issue 12, June Continued on page 3 VOLUME 2, ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2007 Page 3 CONFERENCE REPORT Continued from page 2 2006, already advertised in the previous of an Enemy or Image of a Friend? November. He also attended a Newsletter) on The New Europe and the International Images as a Factor in conference in Kyiv in early October ‘Outsiders’: Is There a Values Gap? EU-Russia Relations’ that Valentina on ‘strategic elites and European (guest edited by Derek Hutcheson and co-presented with Sirke Mäkinen enlargement’; the paper is due to Elena Korosteleva). It contains articles from the University of Tampere (who appear in a local sociology journal, by Katsu on ‘Participation and protest in spent a few months as a visiting Sotsiologiya. He lectured in Dublin the European Union and the “outsider” researcher with us in and St Andrews, and (as noted states’, by Stephen and Julia on spring/summer 2005). above) at the UACES conference at ‘“Feeling European”: the view from Bela- the end of August. Anke Schmidt-Felzman rus, Russia and Ukraine’ and an article Bill Miller was another participant by Anke (co-written with Giselle Bosse OTHER CONFERENCE NEWS in the AAASS conference, present- and Galina Bogutcaia) entitled ‘Lost in ing a paper jointly with Clare Translation? Political Elites and the In- Stephen took part in a conference McManus-Czubinska of the De- terpretative Values Gap in European at Cambridge in early September partment of Central and East Euro- Neighbourhood Policies’. with a paper on ‘communist nostal- gia’, using survey data for Russia, pean Studies. Anke and Valentina organised another Ukraine and Belarus (it will appear Valentina gave another paper at panel at the conference on ‘The EU and in a volume edited by David Lane a seminar on ‘Images of Russia in its Eastern Neighbourhood: Visions and next year, and in Russian in Mir Europe - Voices from Germany, Interests in Conflict?’, chaired by Derek, Rossii). He contributed a paper on France and Poland’ that was or- which was well attended and received a Belarusian and Ukrainian interna- ganized by the Stiftung Genshagen good response from the audience – it tional orientations to a conference and held in the castle of Gensha- was even mentioned at the conference on Belarus in Warsaw in mid- gen near Berlin (Germany) on No- dinner by Sir John Kerr of Kinlochard, November (the papers will appear in vember 29 – December 1.
Recommended publications
  • Newsletter 15 July.Pub
    VOLUME 6, ISSUE 2 TRANSFORMATION GROUP NEWSLETTER JULY 2010 GLASGOW UNIVERSITY THE COLD WAR STILL CONTINUES… INSIDE THIS ISSUE: along the DMZ – always in all disciplines. of them.) There are dire warnings THE COLD WAR 1 known, for some reason, as not to make unexpected gestures, or STILL CONTIN- What was most notable, as we the DeeEmZee. It’s certainly carry a bag, and when we drive U E S … drove north, was the mounting the scariest place I’ve ever round the zone afterwards there are CONFERENCES level of security and the falling 3 visited (writes Stephen), and I firm instructions not to get out of our AND WORK- incidence of human habitation S H O P S crossed into East Berlin minicoach. Not even when we pass (although there are two func- through Checkpoint Charlie the Bridge of No Return, where tens PRESENTA- 4 tioning villages T I O N S soon after the Wall was built. within the zone It’s not easy to get there ei- itself, one on each PUBLICATIONS 5 ther, although it’s not far side, and it is a (about an hour’s drive) from rich reserve of the Korean capital, and there ACADEMIC AC- 5 plant and animal T I V I T I E S are tourist trips, for those who life). The ‘zone’ is can book in advance. In this in fact a strip of case, the Korean authorities G R A N T S 6 land about two made it possible for a small and a half miles number of those who were wide, heavily forti- V I S I T O R S 7 attending the East Asian Con- fied on both sides.
    [Show full text]
  • The EU and the Eastern Partnership Countries: How to “Lose Weight” and Incentivise Reforms?
    The EU and the Eastern Partnership Countries: How to “lose weight” and incentivise reforms? GCRF COMPASS Research Brief Sergiu Buscaneanu & Elena Korosteleva 17 February 2020 COMPASS: Comprehensive Capacity-Building in the Eastern Neighbourhood and Central Asia: research integration, impact governance & sustainable communities (GCRF UKRI ES/P010849/1) 1 2 The EU and the Eastern Partnership Countries: How to ‘‘lose weight” and incentivise reforms? Sergiu Buscaneanu & Elena Korosteleva Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 4 “New Wine in Old Wineskins” ........................................................................................................ 4 Domestic Transformation Costs ....................................................................................................... 5 What Policy Response? .................................................................................................................... 7 *** This Research Brief was supported by the European Commission under H2020-MSCA-IF-2016 (Grant 746909) and GCRF UKRI COMPASS (Grant ES/P010849/1), for which the authors are highly grateful. The GCRF COMPASS project (ES/P010849/1, 2017-21) is an ambitious UK government capacity-building funding initiative, aiming to extend UK research globally, to address the challenges of growth and sustainability in the developing countries. Notably, the COMPASS project at the University of Kent, together with
    [Show full text]
  • International Relations
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Kent Academic Repository International Relations http://ire.sagepub.com/ Change or Continuity: Is the Eastern Partnership an Adequate Tool for the European Neighbourhood? Elena A. Korosteleva International Relations 2011 25: 243 DOI: 10.1177/0047117811404446 The online version of this article can be found at: http://ire.sagepub.com/content/25/2/243 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com On behalf of: David Davies Memorial Institute for International Studies Additional services and information for International Relations can be found at: Email Alerts: http://ire.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://ire.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav >> Version of Record - Jun 22, 2011 What is This? Downloaded from ire.sagepub.com at Templeman Lib/The Librarian on April 14, 2014 Article International Relations 25(2) 243–262 Change or Continuity: © The Author(s) 2011 Reprints and permission: sagepub. Is the Eastern Partnership co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0047117811404446 an Adequate Tool for the ire.sagepub.com European Neighbourhood? Elena A. Korosteleva Abstract This article examines the discourse of the EU’s relations with eastern Europe under the recently launched Eastern Partnership (EaP) initiative. First, it evaluates the EaP’s conceptual framework to suggest that there seems to be more continuity than change in the EU’s modus operandi with its neighbours. More crucially, the notion of ‘partnership’, central to the new philosophy of cooperation with the outsiders, continues to be ill defined, causing a number of problems for the effective and legitimate realisation of the European Neighbourhood Policy/Eastern Partnership in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Quiet Revolution? Belarus After the 2006 Presidential Election Elena Korosteleva
    This article was downloaded by: [Korosteleva, Elena] On: 7 July 2009 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 912935200] Publisher Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713635808 Was There a Quiet Revolution? Belarus After the 2006 Presidential Election Elena Korosteleva Online Publication Date: 01 June 2009 To cite this Article Korosteleva, Elena(2009)'Was There a Quiet Revolution? Belarus After the 2006 Presidential Election',Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics,25:2,324 — 346 To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/13523270902861038 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13523270902861038 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • Avoiding a New 'Cold War': the Future of EU-Russia Relations in the Context Of
    SPECIALREPORT SR020 March 2016 Avoiding a New 'Cold War' The Future of EU-Russia Relations in the Context of the Ukraine Crisis Editor LSE IDEAS is an Institute of Global Affairs Centre Dr Cristian Nitoiu that acts as the School’s foreign policy think tank. Through sustained engagement with policymakers and opinion-formers, IDEAS provides a forum that IDEAS Reports Editor informs policy debate and connects academic research Joseph Barnsley with the practice of diplomacy and strategy. IDEAS hosts interdisciplinary research projects, produces working papers and reports, holds public Creative Director and off-the-record events, and delivers cutting-edge Indira Endaya executive training programmes for government, business and third-sector organisations. Cover image source The ‘Dahrendorf Forum - Debating Europe’ is a joint www.istockphoto.com initiative by the Hertie School of Governance, the London School of Economics and Political Science and Stiftung Mercator. Under the title “Europe and the World” the project cycle 2015-2016 fosters research and open debate on Europe’s relations with five major regions. lse.ac.uk/IDEAS Contents SPECIALREPORT SR020 March 2016 Avoiding A New ‘Cold War’: The Future of EU-Russia Relations in the Context of the Ukraine Crisis EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Cristian Nitoiu PRefaCE 3 Vladislav Zubok CONTRIBUTORS 6 PART I. EU-RUSSIA RelaTIONS: PAST, PRESENT, FUTURE Could it have been Different? 8 The Evolution of the EU-Russia Conflict and its Alternatives Tuomas Forsberg and Hiski Haukkala Russia and the EU: A New Future Requested 15 Fyodor Lukyanov Why the EU-Russia Strategic Partnership Could Not Prevent 20 a Confrontation Over Ukraine Tom Casier Security Policy, Geopolitics and International Order 26 in EU-Russia Relations during the Ukraine Crisis Roy Allison Member States’ Relations with Russia: Solidarity and Spoilers 33 Maxine David PART II.
    [Show full text]
  • Kent Academic Repository Full Text Document (Pdf)
    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Korosteleva, Elena (2019) Reclaiming resilience back: A local turn in EU external governance. Contemporary Security Policy . pp. 1-34. ISSN 1352-3260. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1685316 Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/77752/ Document Version Publisher pdf Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html Contemporary Security Policy ISSN: 1352-3260 (Print) 1743-8764 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fcsp20 Reclaiming resilience back: A local turn in EU external governance Elena A. Korosteleva To cite this article: Elena A. Korosteleva (2019): Reclaiming resilience back: A local turn in EU external governance, Contemporary Security Policy, DOI: 10.1080/13523260.2019.1685316 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1685316 © 2019 The Author(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Country Profile – Belarus
    Legal Aid Board, Ireland Refugee Documentation Centre 9th European Country of Origin Information Seminar Organised by the Refugee Documentation Centre, Ireland and UNHCR Dublin, 26-27 May 2004 COUNTRY PROFILE – BELARUS The views and opinions stated in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizers of the workshop. This paper is not, and does not purport to be, fully exhaustive with regard to conditions in the country surveyed, or conclusive as to the merits of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Belarus Location: Eastern Europe, east of Poland Area: 80,155 square miles/207,600 sq km Capital: Minsk Independence: 25 August 1991 (from Soviet Union) Constitution: 15 March 1994; revised by national referendum of 24 November 1996 giving the presidency greatly expanded powers and became effective 27 November 1996; revised again 17 October 2004 removing presidential term limits Population: 10,293,011 (July 2006 est.) Suffrage: 18 years of age; universal Ethnic Groups: Belarusian 81.2%, Russian 11.4%, Polish 3.9%, Ukrainian 2.4%, other 1.1% (1999 census) Languages: Belarusian, Russian, other Religions: Eastern Orthodox 80%, other (including Roman Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, and Muslim) 20% (1997 est.) Head of state Chief of state: President Aleksandr LUKASHENKO (since 20 July 1994) Head of government: Prime Minister Sergei SIDORSKY (since 19 December 2003); First Deputy Prime Minister Vladimir SEMASHKO (since December 2003) Political parties and leaders 1 9th COI Seminar Organised by the RDC - Ireland and UNHCR
    [Show full text]
  • Delegatess PACK
    COMPASS LONDON policy forum 28-29 January 2019 DELEGATES’ PACK COMPASS: Comprehensive Capacity-Building in the Eastern Neighbourhood and Central Asia: research integration, impact governance & sustainable communities 0 Table of Contents Background .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Key Information ................................................................................................................................... 1 Venue Map ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Agenda ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Speaker Biographies ............................................................................................................................. 5 List of Delegates ................................................................................................................................. 14 List of Attendees ................................................................................................................................ 16 Background The GCRF UKRI COMPASS project is an ambitious UK government capacity-building initiative, aiming to extend UK research globally, to address the challenges of growth and sustainability in the developing countries. Notably, the COMPASS project at the University
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus in the Time of Crisis: Towards the Year(S) of Quality?
    Belarus in the time of Crisis: towards the Year(s) of Quality? Elena Korosteleva, Department of International Politics Paper prepared for the conference ‘International Crisis and Post- Soviet States’, 13-14 May 2010, Glasgow University Structure Global financial crisis: what crisis? Political change: some critical signposts A new discourse: towards the year of quality President’s state of the nation address (2008-10) Elites: bipolarity vs multi-vectoredness Population: the lingering of Russia Youngsters: knowledgeable but lost? Conclusions ESRC-funded project ‘Europeanising or Securitising the outsiders? Assessing the EU’s partnership-building approach with Eastern Europe’, 2008-2010 (RES-061-25-0001) Methodology: Surveys: published in EU and conducted in EE Interviews (across the border): government officials, MPs, Presidential Administration, journalists, think-tanks, civil servants, academics Focus groups School essays on Europe For more information: http://www.aber.ac.uk/interpol/en/research/EKPproject/index.htm or www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/minisites/widereurope/index.html Global Financial Crisis: what crisis? 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Real growth GDP (% growth) 8.6 10.0 -0.3 3.8 4.4 5.3 6.3 6.9 Nominal GDP (billion Belarusian 97.2 128.8 138.4 157.4 178.5 203.0 233.1 269.1 Ruble) Inflation, end of the period (% 12.1 13.3 10.5 8.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 growth) Current account balance -6.8 -8.4 -11.0 -7.2 -5.6 -4.9 -4.0 -3.4 Export of goods 53.7 54.8 44.3 50.6 50.7 50.4 50.5 50.7 Import of goods -62.7 -64.9 -56.3 -59.1 -57.7 -56.5 -56.3 -56.1 Balance of trade -9.0 -10.0 -12.0 -8.5 -6.9 -6.2 -5.8 -5.3 Source: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2010/cr1031.pdf.
    [Show full text]
  • International Relations-2011-Korosteleva-243
    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Korosteleva, Elena (2011) Change or Continuity: Is the Eastern Partnership an Adequate Tool for the European Neighbourhood? International Relations, 25 (2). pp. 243-262. ISSN 0047-1178. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117811404446 Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/39207/ Document Version UNSPECIFIED Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html International Relations http://ire.sagepub.com/ Change or Continuity: Is the Eastern Partnership an Adequate Tool for the European Neighbourhood? Elena A. Korosteleva International Relations 2011 25: 243 DOI: 10.1177/0047117811404446 The online version of this article can be found at: http://ire.sagepub.com/content/25/2/243
    [Show full text]
  • Resilience As EU Governance in the Neighbourhood
    Paradigmatic or Critical? Resilience as a New Turn in EU governance for the Neighbourhood Elena Korosteleva School of Politics and International Relations, University of Kent Abstract ‘Resilience’ is gradually pervading the EU external governance thinking. It rose from the margins of the EU aid documents to become a centrepiece of the EU Global Security Strategy in 2016, especially in relation to the neighbourhood. It already begins to make an imprint: at least in rhetoric the EU is now committed to become more pragmatic and responsive to the challenges of growing complexity; and crucially, more de- centred in sharing governance and responsibility with its partners. While these positive changes may certainly vindicate some policy shortcomings of the past, and even signify another paradigmatic shift in the EU modus operandi in the neighbourhood, the question writ large here is whether this shift is critical enough to render EU governance a new turn to make it truly sustainable? This article argues that in order for resilience-framed governance to gain more traction especially in the neighbourhood, the EU needs not just recognise, learn about and engage with ‘the local’ and ‘the peoplehood’ on the outside. More crucially, it needs to accept ‘the other’ for what it is, and instead of devolving the burden of responsibility, give the latter an opportunity to grow its own critical infrastructure capacities to become effectively self-governable. This would not just signify a complete departure from a liberal thinking in EU governance, currently predicated on conditionality and road-mapping. It would make the leap intuitively post-neo-liberal.
    [Show full text]
  • Announcements
    VOLUME 1, ISSUE 4, JUNE 2006 ANNOUNCEMENTS INSIDE THIS ISSUE: PUBLICATIONS William Miller’s recent publi- implications of EU and NATO Myant, (eds.) Varieties cations include ‘Corruption enlargement, which continues of Capitalism (London: ANNOUNCEMENTS: and Corruptibility’ World Devel- until next year. Palgrave, November opment, February 2006 2006), pp.309-334. Yulia Korosteleva’s paper vol.34, no.2: pp. 371-380 and ‘'Maximising Seigniorage and Sarah Oates’s new ‘Perceptions, experience and Inflation Tax: The Case of Bel- book Television, Democ- lies: What measures corrup- arus', based on her PhD, has racy and Elections in · Publications tion? And what do corruption been recently accepted for Russia has just ap- · Study Groups measures measure? In publication in Eastern peared (Routledge). The Charles Sampford, Arthur · Conferences European Economics. She photograph below is Shacklock, Carmel Connors also published ‘Belarus - incorporated in the · Grants and Fredrik Galtung (eds) Heading Towards State Capi- cover design. · Research Visits Measuring Corruption talism?’, in D. Lane and M. abroad (London: Ashgate, 2006), pp. · Visitors to the 163-185. Department Stephen White is a joint author of Politics in Europe, · Personal which CQ Press will bring out in August. Chris Carman is another contributor. His study of ‘Putin’s Russia and the Enlarged Europe’, with Roy Allison and Margot Light, will appear in the early autumn with Blackwell; it is the first of two book-length studies based on his ESRC project on the The Transformation Group brings together members of the Department of whatever status who take a primary or at least substantial interest in the process of political change in Eastern Europe, the former USSR and China.
    [Show full text]