DOCSLIB.ORG

The History of Nansemond County, Virginia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The History of Nansemond County, Virginia v •<a °^lBl^ r *<? %s-m-°\/' w o rt *o< V . ^ 0> .« ^O > *0 o V ^ <v t o v 0N ° ,0 .. " ^ s ^ f V •^ ^ ^ ^ .4 , ^^ *„ tV o< 0'' ^ . ^^^: ^n* :m%^n:+ ^<f °<^m?ik« >, e > * r «> ' o^ » • o >*% A^ « . •«• ^ .^ *^A^vA ''TV.'- *o G* rf ,c,vn s • V * • * ~ "° * * Jy Kr • * Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from The Library of Congress http://www.archive.org/details/historyofnansemoOOdunn OLD DOMINION LINE Steamships "MONROE'7'PRINCESS ANNE'V'JAMESTOWN" "HAMILTON" and "JEFFERSON." Sailing from Norfolk for New York daily, except Sunday, at 7 p. m. Sailing from New York for Norfolk daily, except Sunday, at 3 p. m. NIGHT LINE FOR RICHMOND. For Richmond, new steamers "BERKELEY" and "BRANDON" leave Company's Wharf, foot of Church Street, 7 o'clock every night. For Old Point and Hampton, steamer "Luray." For Old Point, East, Ware, North (Matthews and Gloucester Coun- ties) and Severn Rivers, Steamer "MOBJACK." For Newport News and Smithfield, Steamers' "HAMPTON" and "ACCOMAC." For Nansemond River and Suffolk, Steamer "VIRGINIA DARE." Freight received at Company's Wharf, Water Street, daily except Sunday, until 5 P. M. Passenger Tickets sold and Staterooms reserved at Company's Office on Wharf, or at Union Ticket Office, Main and Granby Streets, Norfolk, Va. For further information relative to Passenger or Freight Rates, apply to JOHN NICHOL, General Agent, NORFOLK, VA. H. B. WALKER, Vice-Pres. and Traffic Mgr. 81 BEACH STREET, NEW YORK. (See Daily Papers for Winter and Summer Changes in Schedule.) ORGANIZED 1869. THE FARMERS BANK OF NANSEMOND Suffolk, Va, Capital - Twenty Thousand Dollars. Surplus and Profits - Five Hundred and Fifty-five Dollars. Total Resources - More than Two Million Dollars. With Long Experience, Unsurpassed Facilities and Increasing Resources, the Institution continues to offer its services to the people. E. E. Holland, G. W. Truitt, President, Vice-President, Wm. H. Jones, Jr., Cashier. JAS. L. McLEMORE, President A. WOOLFORD, Cashier R. A. PRETLOW, Vice-President C. E. HARGRAVE, Ass't. Cashier Bank of Suffolk, SUFFOLK, VIRGINIA. Capital and Profits, - $ 1 62,500.00. RESPECTFULLY SOLICITS YOUR BANKING BUSINESS. Write for OUR Prices THE SUFFOLK PEANUT CO. SUFFOLK, VIRGINIA JOHN KING, J. B. PINNER, President Secy. & Treas. The Oldest Peanut Concern in the Town of Suffolk The Largest Peanut Town in Virginia Six Railroads and One Steamboat Line Give Us Unexcelled Shipping Facilities •;* Write for OUR Prices WOODWARD & ELAM | Insurance and A Surety Bonds k •" SUFFOLK, - - VIRGINIA J FRANKLIN, VA. SMITHFIELD, VA. V • • : Nansemond River Brick & Tile Co. ' ^*AVING abiding faith in the future growth and *|f^| ife developement of Eastern Virginia, and especially i*J" * J, of the peanut belt of Nansemond County, the ^^$^5^ above business was organized, and in 1901 incor- porated under the laws of the State of Virginia Located upon deep water, accessible to all tidewater markets, from a very small beginning the business has become one of some magnitude, its present annual output being twelve million building brick, in addition to other products. The Com- pany is fortunate in owning what is, probably, one of the most valuable clay deposits in Eastern Virginia, it being a peninsular, several hundred acres in extent, bounded on the east by a narrow creek, south by the Nansemond River, west by the western branch of the Nansemond, and upon the north by the public highway leading from Suffolk to Smithfield. Upon this public road the Company have a handsome brick store, well stocked with goods, and also their General Manager's residence: Lying in the world's best Peanut territory, these lands have, under the intelligent culture of their General Manager, who is a stockholder in the Company, become profitable holdings, aside from their value on account of a deep and strong "brick clay" subsoil of from ten to twelve feet in depth. With a second plant nearly equipped, having sufficient capacity for fully doubling their output, unlimited raw material, the use of the most modern machinery and methods, the remarkable in- crease in fertility of their lands, the location of some twenty- five families of employees upon this property, and the gradual but sure increase of their merchandising business, we think the Company may reasonably look to the future with hope and confidence. Handle the Best PEANUTS SUPERB JUMBO BELLE OF WAKEFIELD GAMECOCKS (Fancy) DIAMOND BRAND (Extra) All Grades of Virginia oncf Spanish Shelled Cleaned and Packed by THE BAIN PEANUT CO., inc. WAKEFIELD, VIRGINIA FACTORIES: Wakefield, Va. Petersburg, Va. Suffolk, Va. Norfolk, Va. Another Prosperous Nansemond County Enterprise Interstate Fire Insurance Co., Inc. SUFFOLK, VA. Capital $131,000.00 Surplus to Policy Holders 154,185.87 Total Assets - - 163,394.07 President J. E. WEST, G. W. TRUITT, Vice-President Secretary-Trees. J. T. WITHERS, iniiiiiiiiiiiMri "Iii«I?!Ii!5i9iiii?BlMii5?|||y|llyiiOii™i=ii""if"iH= sm in anil 39 1 I. Walter Hosier I ::t: . / a: "» £!!! urn | SI! in* : a "m II,'* I REAL ESTATE, I £1! INVESTMENTS : and General Insurance Kilby Street, SUFFOLK, - - VA. *F THE HISTORY OF NANSEMOND COUNTY VIRGINIA Th BY JOS. B. DUNN 3'Tu [iff IS;L5\.^U*\AA-CiS- I^YuJAJC. d O "fO'OT- V m 13 The first mention of the name Nansemond is found in Smith's History of Virginia. In the summer of 1608 Capt. John Smith with twelve companions came up the river called Nansemond after a tribe of Indians of that name. Smith and his men were attacked in the neighborhood of an island now called Dumpling Island. The m w '• „.=3^ Colonel Phillip's Residence on Nansemond River main settlement of the Nansemond tribe was near the mouth of West- ern Branch, and the island opposite was used as a place for storing their corn. The Nansemond tribe numbered three hundred warriors, and their canoes filled with fighting men suddenly appeared and sur- rounded the little craft that held Smith's exploring party. At the first volley of musketry the Indians leaped overboard and swam to shore. Smith promptly captured the canoes and was in the act of W. J. Lee's Residence on Nansemond River destroying them when the Indians from the banks made signs of sur- render. They were glad to purchase peace at the cost of "400 bas- kets of full corne," which supply helped to relieve the hungry colon- ists at Jamestown. In 1609 when affairs were growing desperate at Jamestown and starvation threatened the destruction of the colony, 14 Capt. Smith remembered the river whose banks were oyster shells and in whose midst was the isle of plenty. He ordered Capt. John Martin with over a hundred men to proceed up the Nansemond river and found a permanent settlement upon its banks. Martin went in for heroic measures. He seized the Indian chief, captured the town of Nansemond, and took for the use of his men the corn on Dump- ling Island. Flushed with success he grew careless, and the Indians surprised him by a sudden attack, rescued their chief and carried off the thousand bushels of corn that Martin had appropriated. Martin thoroughly demoralized by the change of fortune, fled to James- town, leaving his men to make the best of the situation. Left with- Iion Bridge, Everet's Va. out a leader, the men returned to Jamestown, and Smith's plan for a city on the banks of the Nansemond was abandoned. The Indian word Nansemond means "fishing-point or angle," and was the name given by the Indians to their town which was situated in the angle made by the junction of Western Branch with the main stream of the river. The tribe takes its name from their chief settlement and the liver is named for the tribe. Neither Smith nor Martin seems to have gone further up the river than the point where the stream di- vides. Dumpling Island, probably receives its name very early, for in 1636 a grant to "a place known as Dumpling Island" is made to Wm. Parker. In 1612 Sir Thomas Dale with 100 men explored the 15 Nansemond River to its sources. At the time of the great massacre in 1622 Edward Waters and his wife were captured by the Nanse- St. Paul's P. E. Church, Suffolk, Va. mond Indians and taken to the mouth of that river, from which they seemed to have little chance of escape ; but one day an empty boat be- longing to some English ship happened to drift ashore, and in their rejoicings over it the Indians relaxed their guard, and Waters and his wife escaped in a canoe to Kiquotan. The great grandson of 16 this Waters had an only child, Sarah, who married David Meade, a distinguished citizen of Nansemond. In 1622 in retaliation for the part the Nansemond tribe had ta- ken in the massacre of the Colonists, Sir George Geardley devastated the country of the Nansemonds with 300 men. The massacre of 1644 was again followed by invasions of the Indian country, with such success that the power of the neighboring tribes was broken. At the session of the Assembly, 1644-5, the inhabitants of the coun- try south of James River were ordered to make marches upon the Indians. In March 1646 war was again declared upon the Nanse- Washmgtou Square, Suffolk, Va. mond and adjoining tribes, but within a few months the natives had been so thoroughly subdued that in October, 1646, the Assembly re- pealed the acts prohibiting trade with the Indians, for cutting down their corn and for making war upon the Nansemonds. From this time the Nansemond tribe gradually dwindled away.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • James River by Anadromous Fishes
    USE OF OF LOWER TRIBUTARIES THE JAMES ANADROMOUS RIVER FISHES BY Iq•chae1 Odom C. R¢chard J. Neves John Ney J. Mudr, John I•I. e H•ZdZ•e and Sciences Depar•men• F•sher•es o• University V•,rg•n•a Znst•tute PoZytechn•c and State V•rg•n•a BZacksburg, USE TRIBUTARIES OF THE OF LOWER JAMES RIVER BY ANADROMOUS FISHES Final Report for Analysis Phase of Impediments Two the of an Spawning Migrations to of Virginia Anadromous Fish in Rivers by: Prepared Michael Odom C. Richard J. Neves Ney John J. John Mudre M. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences Virginia Polytechnic University Institute and State Blacksburg, Virginia 2•061 by: Sponsored Virginia Highway Research Council Virginia Highways Department Transportation of and August, 1986 ABSTRACT The tributaries of (downstream lower of the River James use Virginia) Richmond, by striped of bass, shad, American alewife, herring blueback and by reviewing determined was literature, consulting knowledgeable personnel, and agency interviewing local fishermen landowners. and Barriers to upstream tributary, identified for each movement and were highway all crossings impact evaluated their for were on spawning migrations. Striped and bass American shad spawn primarily spawning in the River but James proper, some apparently Chickahominy species in the River. Both occurs only River, ascend Appomattox the but American shad are known preference it. in of their to Because to spawn spawn large tributaries, usually in bridged, highway which are crossings impede do striped either bass not to appear or drainage. American shad in the River James (collectively herring Alewife blueback and known as herring) river ascend and in tributaries that most spawn empty into the River upstream (the James River of Mile 40 Virginia), Scotland, provided of they town have free access adequate depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Untitled Typescript}, Macclenny Papers
    TABLE OF CONTENTS MAP OF SURVEY AREA SURVEY METHODOLOGY 1 HISTORIC CONTEXT OF SURVEY AREA 5 Physical Characteristics 5 Colonial Period 6 The Federal Period and the Nineteenth Century 24 The Twentieth Century 38 HISTORIC THEMES 46 Residential and Domestic Architecture Agriculture Government, Law and Welfare Education Military Religion Social and Cultural Transportation Commerce Industry, Manufacturing and Crafts THREATS TO HISTORIC RESOURCES 94 RECOMMENDATIONS 95 SOURCES 97 APPENDICES: INDEXES TO SURVEY SITES 101 Numerical Listing Alphabetical Listing SURVEY METHODOLOGY In May 1989 the City of Suffolk contracted with Frazier Associates of Staunton, Virginia to conduct a reconnaissance level architectural survey of 260 historic resources in the southern section of the City. This survey was funded in part by a grant from the National Park Service of the U. S. Department of the Interior through the Virginia Department of Historic Resources. The City of Suffolk is located within the Lower Tidewater Region, one of the geographic areas of the state which the Virginia Department of Historic Resources has created as a part of their State Preservation Plan. / This survey area is approximately 317.42 square miles and corresponds to the southern section of the former Nansemond County. It includes portions of the U. S. G. S. quad maps of Buckhorn, Corapeake, Franklin, Gates, Holland, Riverdale, Suffolk, Whaleyville, and Windsor. Parts of the quads of Lake Drumrnond and Lake Drurnmond N. W. are also in the survey - area butwere not included in tabulations since all of this area is in the Dismal Swamp and contains no historic resources to survey. The detailed boundary of the survey area extends from the City boundary with Isle of Wight County at U.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining the Greater York River Indigenous Cultural Landscape
    Defining the Greater York River Indigenous Cultural Landscape Prepared by: Scott M. Strickland Julia A. King Martha McCartney with contributions from: The Pamunkey Indian Tribe The Upper Mattaponi Indian Tribe The Mattaponi Indian Tribe Prepared for: The National Park Service Chesapeake Bay & Colonial National Historical Park The Chesapeake Conservancy Annapolis, Maryland The Pamunkey Indian Tribe Pamunkey Reservation, King William, Virginia The Upper Mattaponi Indian Tribe Adamstown, King William, Virginia The Mattaponi Indian Tribe Mattaponi Reservation, King William, Virginia St. Mary’s College of Maryland St. Mary’s City, Maryland October 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As part of its management of the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail, the National Park Service (NPS) commissioned this project in an effort to identify and represent the York River Indigenous Cultural Landscape. The work was undertaken by St. Mary’s College of Maryland in close coordination with NPS. The Indigenous Cultural Landscape (ICL) concept represents “the context of the American Indian peoples in the Chesapeake Bay and their interaction with the landscape.” Identifying ICLs is important for raising public awareness about the many tribal communities that have lived in the Chesapeake Bay region for thousands of years and continue to live in their ancestral homeland. ICLs are important for land conservation, public access to, and preservation of the Chesapeake Bay. The three tribes, including the state- and Federally-recognized Pamunkey and Upper Mattaponi tribes and the state-recognized Mattaponi tribe, who are today centered in their ancestral homeland in the Pamunkey and Mattaponi river watersheds, were engaged as part of this project. The Pamunkey and Upper Mattaponi tribes participated in meetings and driving tours.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the Nansemond River, Virginia Peter R
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Honors Theses Student Research 6-1959 A history of the Nansemond River, Virginia Peter R. Neal Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/honors-theses Recommended Citation Neal, Peter R., "A history of the Nansemond River, Virginia" (1959). Honors Theses. Paper 604. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND LIBRARIES 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 3 3082 01 029 0038 A HESTORY OF THE NANSEMOND RIVER, VIRGINIA A Thesis Presented to the Department of History University of Richmond In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Arts by Peter Roland Neal June 1959 LtS\~?1\F.tY UNt\IE:i~·::.:;n"f GF ~-::CHl\lONLi \/I Fi c; ~ i .J I I" ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to acknowledge the assistance or Mrs. P. M. Burton of Suffolk, Va., who suggested this topic to me, and helped me to find some of the material used in this paper. Also the help of the late Wilber E. Mac Glenny, whose works, both directly and indirectly, have given me much inrormation, must be acknowledged. My thinks also go to Miss Linda Veatch of Westhampton College, who read over my paper and pro­ vided figure three for me, and to my typist, Mrs. R. E. Brennan, of Richmond. I hope this'paper will act as a reminder to all of the part· that the rivers of Virginia have played in the history of this great commonwealth.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventeenth Century Settlement of the Nansemond River in Virginia Emmett De Ward Bottoms Old Dominion University
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons History Theses & Dissertations History Spring 1983 Seventeenth Century Settlement of the Nansemond River in Virginia Emmett dE ward Bottoms Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_etds Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Bottoms, Emmett E.. "Seventeenth Century Settlement of the Nansemond River in Virginia" (1983). Master of Arts (MA), thesis, History, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/9ppr-2744 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_etds/24 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the History at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SEVENTEENTH CENTURY SETTLEMENT OF THE NANSEMOND RIVER IN VIRGINIA by Emmett Edward Bottoms B.S. June 1966, Old Dominion College A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS HISTORY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY May 1983 Approved by: Peter C. Stewart (Director) Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT SEVENTEENTH CENTURY SETTLEMENT OF THE NANSEMOND RIVER IN VIRGINIA Emmett Edward Bottoms Old Dominion University, 1983 Director: Dr. Peter C. Stewart The estuarine Nansemond River in southeastern Virginia provided exploitable resources to Indians and English colonists during the seventeenth century. Coloni­ zation of the Nansemond, attempted in 1609, was resisted by the Nansemond Indians and was accomplished only after they were decimated and displaced. Anglicans and dissenting Puritans and Quakers established churches and meeting houses along the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Living with the Indians Introduction
    LIVING WITH THE INDIANS Introduction Archaeologists believe the American Indians were the first people to arrive in North America, perhaps having migrated from Asia more than 16,000 years ago. During this Paleo time period, these Indians rapidly spread throughout America and were the first people to live in Virginia. During the Woodland period, which began around 1200 B.C., Indian culture reached its high- est level of complexity. By the late 16th century, Indian people in Coastal Plain Virginia, united under the leadership of Wahunsonacock, had organized themselves into approximately 32 tribes. Wahunsonacock was the paramount or supreme chief, having held the title “Powhatan.” Not a personal name, the Powhatan title was used by English settlers to identify both the leader of the tribes and the people of the paramount chiefdom he ruled. Although the Powhatan people lived in separate towns and tribes, each led by its own chief, their language, social structure, religious beliefs and cultural traditions were shared. By the time the first English settlers set foot in “Tsena- commacah, or “densely inhabited land,” the Powhatan Indians had developed a complex culture with a centralized political system. Living With the Indians is a story of the Powhatan people who lived in early 17th-century Virginia— their social, political, economic structures and everyday life ways. It is the story of individuals, cultural interactions, events and consequences that frequently challenged the survival of the Pow- hatan people. It is the story of how a unique culture, through strong kinship networks and tradition, has endured and maintained tribal identities in Virginia right up to the present day.
    [Show full text]
  • Farm Lane Were Examined in Order to Determine the Location of All Applicable Historic Resources to Be Surveyed
    TABLE OF CONTENTS MAP OF SURVEY AREA SURVEY METHODOLOGY HISTORIC CONTEXT OF SURVEY AREA Early Settlement Agriculture Education Military Religion Transportation Industry/Manufacturing /Crafts SURVEY FINDINGS THREATS TO HISTORIC RESOURCES RECOMMENDATIONS INDEX TO SURVEY SITES Numerical Index Alphabetical Index BIBLIOGRAPHY CITY OF SUFFOLK, VIRGINIA SURVEY METHODOLOGY In May 1988 the City of Suffolk contracted with Frazier Associates of Staunton, Virginia to conduct a reconnaissance level architectural survey of historic resources in the northern section of the City. This survey was funded in part by a grant from the National Park Service of the U. S. Department of the Interior through the Division of Historic Landmarks of the Virginia Department of Conservation and Historic Resources. The City of Suffolk is located within the Lower Tidewater Region, one of the geographic areas of the state which the Virginia Division of Historic Landmarks has created as a part of their State Preservation Plan. This survey area is approximately 96.5 square miles and corresponds to the northern section of the former Nansemond County. It included portions of the U. S. G. S. quad maps of Benns Church, Bowers Hill, Chuckatuck, Newport News South, and Windsor. The detailed boundary of the survey area extended from the City boundary with Isle of Wight County in a southwesterly direction to U. S. Route 460, then along U. S. Route 460 to U. S. Route 58 By-Pass, then along the by-pass in an easterly direction to U. S. Route 460/58/13, then along U. S. Route 460/58/13 in a northeasterly direction to the City of Chesapeake line and then in a northerly direction along the City of Suffolk and City of Chesapeake boundary to Hampton Roads (see attached map).
    [Show full text]
  • WE HAVE a STORY to TELL the Native Peoples of the Chesapeake Region
    A GUIDE FOR TEACHERS GRADES 9-12 I-AR T!PLESI PEACE Onwun The Mull S..1M• ...i Migb<y PIUNC,'11. 8'*'C,,...fllc:-..I. ltJosolf oclW,S."'-', fr-•U>d lrti..I. n.<.odnJll>. f.O,ctr. l11iiiJ11 lCingJ... and - Queens, c!re. ("', L l.r.Jdic t~'ll~~ti.flf-9, 16-'"'. DEDICATION Group of Chickahominy Indians at the Chickahominy River, Virginia, 1918. Photo by Frank G. Speck. For the Native Americans of the Chesapeake region—past, present, and future. We honor your strength and endurance. Thank you for welcoming us to your Native place. Education Office of the National Museum of the American Indian Acknowledgments Coauthors, Researchers: Gabrielle Tayac, Ph.D. (Piscataway), Edwin Schupman (Muscogee) Contributing Writer: Genevieve Simermeyer (Osage) Editor: Mark Hirsch Reviewers: Leslie Logan (Seneca), Clare Cuddy, Kakwireiosta Hall (Cherokee/Mohawk), Benjamin Norman (Pamunkey) Additional Research: Danielle Moretti-Langholtz, Ph.D., Buck Woodard (Lower Muscogee Creek), Angela Daniel, Andy Boyd Design: Groff Creative Inc. Special Thanks: Helen Scheirbeck, Ph.D. (Lumbee); Sequoyah Simermeyer (Coharie), National Congress of American Indians; NMAI Photo Services All illustrations and text © 2006 NMAI, Smithsonian Institution, unless otherwise noted. TABLE OF CONTENTS WE HAVE A STORY TO TELL The Native Peoples of the Chesapeake Region Introduction for Teachers Overview/Background, Acknowledgments, Pronunciation of Tribal Names . 2 Lesson Plan. 3 Lesson Questions . 5 Reading Native Peoples of the Chesapeake Region and the Enduring Effects of Colonialism . 6 SMALL GROUP PROJECT AND CLASS PRESENTATION Issues of Survival for Native Communities of the Chesapeake Region Instructions for Small Group Project . 15 Readings, Study Questions, Primary Resources, and Secondary Resources Issue 1: The Effects of Treaty Making .
    [Show full text]
  • The Pamunkey Indian Reservation
    water Article The Role of Traditional Knowledge in Coastal Adaptation Priorities: The Pamunkey Indian Reservation Nicole S. Hutton * and Thomas R. Allen Department of Political Science and Geography, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-757-683-3854 Received: 24 November 2020; Accepted: 15 December 2020; Published: 17 December 2020 Abstract: Coastal reservations are increasingly vulnerable to hazards exacerbated by climate change. Resources for restoration projects are limited. Storm surge, storms, tidal flooding, and erosion endanger artifacts and limit livelihoods of tribes in coastal Virginia. GIS offers a platform to increase communication between scientists, planners, and indigenous groups. The Pamunkey Indian Tribe engaged in a participatory mapping exercise to assess the role of traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) in coastal management decision-making and its capacity to address flooding. Priorities and strategies were spatially referenced using maps of potential sea level rise for 2040, 2060, and 2080, input into a resilience matrix to identify benchmarks for each phase of disaster resilience building, and contextualized with oral histories. Results highlight increased immediacy to protect housing and heritage sites along the shoreline as well as maintain access to the Reservation. Preferences toward structural solutions guided by and facilitating TEK options were expressed. Additional community capacities, tribal council support, federal assistance, impact assessments, and coordination would facilitate risk reduction project implementation. The screening process integrates TEK with planning and is transferable to neighboring tribes. Keywords: traditional ecological knowledge; sea level rise; shoreline management; erosion; coastal hazards 1. Introduction Coastal, estuarine, and intertidal flooding and consequently the risk posed to coastal populations are exacerbated by climate change and development worldwide [1–4].
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 79/Tuesday, April 27, 2021/Notices
    22258 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 27, 2021 / Notices members of the Pawnee Nation of burials but without any further DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oklahoma. attributions. Human skeletal remains In 1940, 321 cultural items were and associated funerary objects from National Park Service removed from cemeteries associated this site were repatriated to the Pawnee [NPS–WASO–NAGPRA–NPS0031769; with the Clarks site (25PK1) in Polk Nation of Oklahoma in 1990–1991. The PPWOCRADN0–PCU00RP14.R50000] County, NE. These objects were four unassociated funerary objects are recovered during archeological three soil samples and one flintlock Notice of Inventory Completion: excavations by the Nebraska State rifle. Valentine Museum, Richmond, VA Historical Society. The 321 objects are listed as having been recovered from This village was occupied by the AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. burials but without any further Kitkahaki Band of the Pawnee from ACTION: Notice. attributions. Human skeletal remains about 1775 to 1809, based on and associated funerary objects from archeological and ethnohistorical SUMMARY: The Valentine Museum has this site were repatriated to the Pawnee information, as well as oral traditional completed an inventory of human Nation of Oklahoma in 1990–1991. The information provided by members of the remains and associated funerary objects, 321 unassociated funerary objects are: Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma. in consultation with the appropriate 15 brass/copper bells, one brass/copper Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian ornament, one bridle bit, two bullet Determinations Made by History organizations, and has determined that molds, five chalk fragments, four Nebraska there is a cultural affiliation between the human remains and associated funerary chipped stone flakes, five chipped stone Officials of History Nebraska have tools, two clasp knives, three clay objects and present-day Indian Tribes or determined that: lumps, three cloth and leather Native Hawaiian organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • 1994 Field Report
    FIELD REPORT 1994 Nicholas M. Luccketti William M. Kelso Beverly A. Straube May 1994 Jamestown, Virginia 1 ABSTRACT In 1994, the Association for the Preservation of Virginia Antiquities launched Jamestown Rediscovery, a plan of extended archaeological research. The first phase of Jamestown Rediscov- ery seeks to locate and investigate the site of the first settlement and fort at Jamestown. The 1994 field season consisited of the excavation of a forty-foot square southeast of the Confederate Fort between Jamestown Memorial Church and the seawall along the James River. The excavation discovered that beneath the plowzone were intact features, including a slot trench for a palisade, a roundish pit approximately 12’ in diameter and 5.5’ deep, part of a rectangu- lar pit at least 13’ long on one side, and a deep, wide ditch. The artifact assemblage indicates that the slot trench and round pit date to the first years of settlement at Jamestown, possibly as early as c. 1610. The wide ditch backfill dates to the mid-seventeenth century, while the date of the rectan- gular pit has yet to be determined. Over 30,000 artifacts have been recovered during the first year of excavation, including an intact cabasset. The assemblage also contains evidence of glassmaking and copper bead manufac- turing. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS page LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS 4 INTRODUCTION 5 HISTORIC CONTEXT 7 RESEARCH DESIGN 10 A. Background 12 B. Objectives 15 C. Methodology 16 RESULTS 17 A. General Stratigraphy 17 B. Pit I 18 C. Palisade 21 D. Ditch I 22 E. Pit II 23 F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Virginia Indians Meet the Tribes Student Activity Book
    The Virginia Indians Meet the Tribes http://virginiaindians.pwnet.org/history/modern_indians.php Student Activity Book Virginia Department of Education © 2013 Table of Contents Introduction………..…………………..…………...1 Virginia’s First People: 1607………………………2 Adaptations & Occupations: 1607…………….3 Adaptations & Occupations: Today…………..4 The Virginia Indian Pow Wow……………………6 Regalia………………………………………………7 Similarities & Differences………………….……..8 Tech it Up: Find out More!………………………..9 Introduction European colonists arriving in Virginia may have been greeted with, "Wingapo." Indians have lived in what is now called Virginia for thousands of years. While we are still learning about the people who inhabited this land, it is clear that Virginia history did not begin in 1607. If you ask any Virginia Indian, "When did you come to this land?" he or she will tell you, "We have always been here." http://virginiaindians.pwnet.org/history/index.php 1 Virginia’s First People http://www.dhr.virginia.gov/arch_NET/timeline/late_wood_map.htm There were three major language families at the time of European contact in 1607: the Siouan, the Algonquian, and the Iroquoian. In the video, Keenan taught us that today, there are eleven different Virginia Indian tribes recognized by the Commonwealth of Virginia. This activity book will give you the opportunity to compare Virginia’s first people from 1607 to Virginia’s first people today. You will also be able to compare your own life and traditions to those of a Virginia Indian child today. 2 Adaptations & Occupations: 1607 Directions: Draw and label pictures that show how Virginia’s first people adapted to their environment and what kinds of occupations they had in 1607.
    [Show full text]