Lake Pyhäjärvi, SW Finland
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Quantifying the Groundwater Component within the Water Balance of a Large Lake in a Glaciated Watershed: Lake Pyhäjärvi, SW Finland by Andrew James Wiebe A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2012 ©Andrew James Wiebe 2012 AUTHOR'S DECLARATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract Accurate estimates of the amount of groundwater entering a lake on a yearly basis may provide valuable information for assessing contaminant loadings such as nutrient mass fluxes and the subsequent contribution of groundwater to eutrophication. Groundwater exchange with lakes is often a critical component of a lake’s water balance, yet its quantification has often proven problematic. Large component uncertainties preclude accurate estimation of the groundwater flux, upon which the assessment of contaminant loadings may depend. In this study, water balance techniques for lake systems were assessed at Lake Pyhäjärvi (near Säkylä, SW Finland), a relatively large lake in a long established agricultural area. A water balance was conducted over 38 water years to estimate the net groundwater discharge into the lake. This was compared with groundwater flux estimates via Darcy’s Law for the adjacent Honkala Aquifer in the Kuivalahti-Säkylä tributary esker (a potential conduit for groundwater impacted by agricultural practices). Direct runoff estimates were initially made using an average of river flow per unit area ratios from the two rivers that flow into the lake. Adjustments to these estimates were made using PART (Rutledge, 2007) hydrograph separation results from the larger river. The mean net groundwater discharge increased from -73 to +38mm per unit lake area (-4.8 to +2.5% of average total inflow) due to these adjustments, which yielded a better qualitative match with observations at the lake (e.g., Rautio, 2009; Rautio and Korkka-Niemi, 2011). Uncertainty analysis for the water balance indicated that relative uncertainty ranged from 40 to 2900% on the net groundwater flux, while the average absolute uncertainty was 118mm per unit lake area. Groundwater discharge estimates based on Darcy’s Law were ≤ 22 mm per unit lake area (≤1.4% of average total inflow) with sizeable uncertainty (± one order of magnitude). Most of the uncertainty on the net groundwater discharge estimates was incurred from the evaporation, precipitation, and direct runoff components; esker flux uncertainty was essentially due to error on the hydraulic conductivity estimate. The resolution of the water balance method suggests that it is better suited to lakes with relatively large net groundwater contributions (>5% of average total inflow). Results highlight the following needs for large lake water balances: improvements in the accuracy of evaporation, precipitation, and direct runoff component estimates; and uncertainty analysis. Groundwater contributions to inflow rivers may be more important than direct discharge from highly permeable subsurface materials adjacent to lakes in the context of understanding nutrient loadings to large lakes. iii Acknowledgements This research was a collaborative effort between the University of Helsinki and Pyhäjärvi Institute, with funding provided by the Maa- ja Vesitekniikan Tuki RY Foundation, Pyhäjärven suojelurahasto, and the University of Waterloo (which provided funding through Research and Teaching Assistantships). There are many professors, students, researchers, Pyhäjärvi area residents, and friends to thank for their assistance in my research. I would like to thank Dr. Dave Rudolph for initially connecting me with Dr. Kirsti Korkka-Niemi and providing the opportunity to travel to Finland to conduct research at Lake Pyhäjärvi that was a prelude to this thesis. I have appreciated Dave’s ―big picture‖ view of the scientific and societal implications of water research. Thank you to Dr. Korkka Niemi, who provided an interesting project and welcomed me to Finland during my two visits. Thanks to Dr. Brewster Conant, Jr., who visited the field site, provided valuable feedback, and was a member of my committee. Dave, Kirsti, and Brewster all provided valuable insight during our meetings. I'm also grateful to Dr. J.P. Jones for being on my committee. Anne Rautio helped me to get oriented to the Turku and Helsinki campuses and answered my many questions. Henriikka Kivilä played a key role during field work, interviewing residents of the area around the lake, translating their knowledge and anecdotes into English for me, assisting with surveying, and chauffeuring me around the lake. Pyhäjärvi Institute researchers Marjo Tarvainen and Teija Kirkkala shared their knowledge of the lake. Officials and researchers at FMI, SYKE, Varsinais-Suomen Ympäristökeskus, and Säkylän kunnanvirasto provided helpful information and data. Residents around Lake Pyhäjärvi allowed us to measure water levels in their wells, shared their knowledge and stories, and offered hospitality. I would especially like to thank the Kivimäkis. Thanks to all the donors who contributed to the 2010 R.N. Farvolden Scholarship. Friends, colleagues, and family have been a great support via Crokinole challenges, sharing meals together, road hockey and soccer games, invitations to visit, and relaxing vacations from study. Thanks to Reynold Chow, Brent Lazenby, Nickie Unonius, Vahid Sohrabi, Marcelo Sousa, Steve Frey, and other colleagues for the many discussions and coffee breaks. Thanks to Inka Vesala, Vilhelm Lindholm, Rami Rekola, and Lihua Sun, who provided accommodation during the 2010 field season. Inka also assisted with some translations. Kiitos! iv Dedication To the Creator, who also walked along the lakeshore. v Table of Contents AUTHOR'S DECLARATION ............................................................................................................... ii Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. iii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................... iv Dedication .............................................................................................................................................. v Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................. vi List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................ x List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................ xi Chapter 1 - Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives .................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Thesis Organization ..................................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 2 - Background ......................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Groundwater and Lakes ............................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Eutrophication .............................................................................................................................. 6 2.3 Water Balance .............................................................................................................................. 6 2.4 Field Study Site ............................................................................................................................ 7 2.4.1 Lake Pyhäjärvi, SW Finland ................................................................................................. 7 2.4.2 Water in the Watershed ......................................................................................................... 8 2.4.3 Climate .................................................................................................................................. 9 2.4.4 Bedrock Geology ................................................................................................................ 10 2.4.5 Quaternary Geology ............................................................................................................ 11 2.4.6 Eskers .................................................................................................................................. 13 2.4.7 Surficial Geology ................................................................................................................ 14 2.4.8 Watershed Topography ....................................................................................................... 15 2.4.9 Hydrogeology ..................................................................................................................... 15 2.4.10 Hydrology ........................................................................................................................