John Ford's Theatre of Ceremony: a Formal Study of His Five Major Plays
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1982 John Ford's Theatre of Ceremony: A Formal Study of His Five Major Plays Chikako D. Kumamoto Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Kumamoto, Chikako D., "John Ford's Theatre of Ceremony: A Formal Study of His Five Major Plays" (1982). Dissertations. 2075. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2075 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1982 Chikako D. Kumamoto JOHN FORD'S THEATRE OF CEREMONY: A FORMAL STUDY OF HIS FIVE MAJOR PLAYS By Chikako D. Kumamoto A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 1982 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank the members of my dissertation committee, Professors Anthony LaBranche, Suzanne Gossett, Bernard McElroy, and James Rocks, whose wisdom, knowledge, and goodwill were an invaluable help, and whose dedication to scholarship was a constant source of inspiration to me. They supported my efforts, on and off the campus, with patience, understanding, and intellectual precision which mark the core of their professional and humanistic concerns. I respectfully extend to them my permanent and deepest gratitude. I also wish to express my appreciation to Professor John Shea who has guided and encouraged my graduate studies throughout my stay at Loyola. Finally I wish to thank my parents and my husband, Steven, without whose trust and care my efforts could not have been completed. ii LIFE The author, Chikako Daishin Kumamoto, is the daughter of Toshio Daishin and Mitsue (Fujii) Daishin. She was born June 3, 1940, in Shinkyo, Manchuria. Her elementary education was obtained in the public schools in Hiroshima, Japan, and secondary education at Notre Dame Immaculate Heart High School, Hiroshima, Japan, where she graduated in 1959. From 1959 to 1963, she attended Notre Dame Immaculate Heart University, Okayama, Japan, where she received a Bachelor of Arts degree with a major in English in 1963. From 1963 to 1965, she attended Hiroshima University in Hiroshima, Japan, where she received a Master of Arts degree in English in 1965. In 1965, she was awarded a Fulbright scholarship to study at Marquette University, where she graduated with a Master of Arts degree in English in 1967. In January, 1976, she was formally admitted to Loyola's Ph.D. program in English as a part-time student. She completed her doctoral course work in December, 1979. ~1s. Kumamoto is married and lives in Glenview, Illinois, with her husband, Steven Y. Kumamoto. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ii LIFE iii Chapter I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. INQUIRY INTO THE CONCEPT OF CEREMONY. 10 Historical Circumstances 10 Puritan Objection to Ceremony • 10 Anglican Defense of Ceremony 30 Ceremony and Drama 52 III. JOHN FORD AND CEREMONY 68 IV. THE LOVER'S MELANCHOLY 93 V. THE BROKEN HEART 141 VI. 'TIS PITY SHE'S A WHORE • 191 VII. LOVE'S SACRIFICE 241 VIII. PERKIN WARBECK • 295 IX. SOME CONCLUSIONS 350 BIBLIOGRAPHY 370 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Since the recovery of John Ford's works by the Victorians in the nineteenth century, the plays of Ford have been the center of considerable critical debate. A review of Ford criticism presents, however, a relationship similar to that which Whitehead remarked between Western philosophy and Plato: just as Western philosophy has been a series of footnotes to Plato, the criticism of Ford has long been a series of footnotes on the nature of Ford's morality. While Ford has become increasingly popular as one of the most widely read of English Renaissance drama- tists, his critics have focused their thoughts on his assumed moral cast, by labelling Ford by turns a "high priest of decadence," a traditional moralist, or a scien tific amoralist.l Some forty years ago, Joan Sargeaunt posed an impor- tant question which led to a now recognizably valid approach 1 For the history of Ford criticism, see the follow ing: Wallace A. Bacon, "The Literary Reputation of John Ford," Huntington Library Quarterly, 11 (1947-48): 181- 199; D. K. Anderson, John Ford (New York: Twayne Publish ers Inc., 1972), pp. 133-142; Joan Sargeaunt, John Ford (New York: Russell & Russell, 1966), pp. 167-187. 1 2 to Ford's plays. After surveying the critical disagree ments among the critics, she asked: 11 What has Apollo to do with Christ? 112 By posing this question, Sargeaunt pointed out the danger for any critic who chooses to dictate on moral grounds to Ford what subjects or modes of treatment he must undertake. More significantly her question was a warning against the separation between moral and aesthetic judgments -- a separation to which Ford's plays are partie- ularly susceptible. Recent Ford critics have heeded her counsel well. They have ceased to judge Ford's plays simply in terms of the characters' abnormal psychology, of dramat ically incredible situations, or to charge Ford with moral decadence and sensationalism. Instead, they have begun to concentrate on Ford's dramaturgy, so as to unify his ethical views and his artistic executions. In order to see Ford more clearly, they have begun to examine Ford within the Jacobean and Caroline ethos, and to explain the modes of dramatic expression appropriate to Ford's ideas and themes 2 Sargeaunt, p. 184. 3 in his plays.3 It is with Sargeaunt's query and the recent critical trend in mind that I shall investigate Ford's use of cere- mony in his five major plays: The Lover's Melancholy, The Broken Heart, 'Tis Pity She's a Whore, Love's Sacrifice and Perkin Warbeck. Some immediate critical benefits can be gained from applying ceremony to Ford's plays. First, this approach allows me to see Ford in relation to his own era. As my second chapter will show in detail, ceremony was a highly controversial subject in early seventeenth century England. The term was disputed by the people, simultane- ously drawing them into the religious, political and theat- rical areas. This historical fact corroborates my assump- tion about Ford's awareness of his social and intellectual environment, and particularly about his awareness of cere- mony as a formal pattern of drama. 3some critics who seek after Ford's dramatic art are: Russell Fraser, "Elizabethan Drama and the Art of Abstraction," Comparative Drama, 2 (1968): 73-82; James Howe, "Ford's The Lady's Trial: A Play of Metaphysical Wit," Genre, 7 (1974): 342-361; R. J. Kaufmann, "Ford's Tragic Perspective," Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 1 (1960): 522-537; B. Morris, "Introduction" to The Broken Heart (London: E. Benn, 1965), pp. xii-xxx; Michael Neill, 11 The Moral Artifice of The Lover's Melan choly," English Literary Renaissance, 8 (1978): 85-106; Jeanne A. Roberts, 11 John Ford's Passionate Abstractions," Southern Humanities Review, 7 (1973): 322-332. 4 Second, while the idea of ceremony enables me to place Ford in his time, it also enables me to shift from the examination of Ford's so-called morality that the old- line critics centered in decadence and sensationalism, to an effort to locate the formal centers of his dramaturgy. It has been recognized that ceremony is a useful term to describe part of Ford's plays. Critics such as Leech, Ornstein and Kirsch have referred to it in passing when describing those stylized gestures in 'Tis Pity She's a Whore or The Broken Heart. 4 Giovanni's appearance on cen- terstage with his sister's heart at the end of his dagger and Calantha's endurance of the news of the three deaths with silent dance are indeed ceremonialized, and these scenes are the most obvious instances worthy of note. What these critics have not pursued, however, it seems to me, is that in terms of Ford's dramaturgy, Giovanni's and Calan- tha's ceremonial postures are the crux of each play's mean- ing. These gestures of Giovanni and Calantha hold some of the keys which explain their inner natures and make impor- tant thematic statements. Instead of being merely empty spectacles and sensationalism of an extreme kind, their 4clifford Leech, John Ford (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1964); Robert Ornstein, The Moral Vision of Jacobean Tragedy (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1960), pp. 200-221; A. c. Kirsch, Jacobean Dramatic Perspectives (Charlottesville: The University Press of Virginia, 1972), pp. 112-126. 5 stylized gestures finally draw up all the disparate elements of the plays 9 focus their ethical stances, and visualize, in an emblematically contracted way, the ultimate sense of paradox in the experiences of love and marriage. These thoughts about ceremony direct me to my third observation about ceremony in relation to Ford's dramaturgy, an observation that ceremonial actions are not limited to those examples which I have remarked. I propose that in Ford's plays, there are many more crucial ceremonial and ceremonial-like actions and moments which seem to deserve further investigation. While the examples of Giovanni and Calantha offer Fordian dramatic prototypes of ceremonial expression in human conduct, they also seem capable of yielding a clearer direction toward defining the kind of dramatic form that Ford might have had in mind. In the following chapters, I shall develop my cere monial approach to Ford in three steps.