DOCSLIB.ORG

The Revenge of Bussy D'ambois

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Revenge of Bussy D'ambois Vol.1:no.1 "Let me not to the marriage of true minds admit impediments..." Fall 2001 A Golden Book, bound richly up From the Editors: Comparing Chapman’s words in Bussy Oxford is d’Ambois with Ashbourne portrait images Shakespeare: By Barbara Burris ©2001 n George Chapman’s play, The Revenge of Bussy D’Ambois, an unsuccessful imitation of Hamlet published in 1613, the main character, Clermont D’Ambois, describes with any questions? Iglowing praise a “famous Earle” as he was seen traveling from Italy to Germany; ending his first newsletter of the Shakespeare 1 with the words, “And t’was the Earle of Oxford.” Fellowship comes off the press at a And yet Clermont—who is modeled after Hamlet—also attacks Oxford and his poetry Tmomentous crossroads in intellec- and “works” in an earlier speech, which includes an amazingly detailed description of the tual history. The paradigm has shifted. The book in the Ashbourne portrait of Shake-speare: intellectual revolution adumbrated in 1920 by the man with the funny name has finally, As these high men doe, low in all true grace, in the wake of Charlton Ogburn’s The Mys- Their height being privilege to all things base. And as the foolish Poet that still writ terious William Shakespeare (1984) and All his most selfe-loved verse in paper royall, subsequent events, come of age. The pro- Or Partchment rul’d with Lead, smooth’d with verbial handwriting is on the wall: an over- the Pumice; whelming preponderance of circumstan- Bound richly up, and strung with Crimson tial evidence, much of it accumulated only strings; in the last 25 years, supports the “Looney” Never so blest as when hee writ and read theory identifying Edward de Vere, 17th The Ape-lov’d issue of his braine; and never But joying in himselfe; admiring ever. Earl of Oxford, as the man behind the Shake- Yet in his workes behold him, and hee show’d speare myth. “Shakespeare” matters —in Like to a ditcher. So these painted men, spite of, and sometimes because of, the fact All set on out-side, looke upon within, that he’s a rose by some other name. And not a pezzants entrailes you shall finde Welcome, therefore, to the first issue of More foule and mezel’d, nor more sterv’d of Shakespeare Matters. We aren’t going to minde. ( Lines 184-195, II,i; emphasis added) 2 bore you with all the reasons why, in Octo- ber 2001, we’ve struck off on this new This speech about the high-born Poet is Shakespeare adventure. The most impor- crammed with references that link the Poet tant reason is the simple one given by the and his richly bound book to the book held by title of our publication. Shakespeare Mat- Courtesy, Folger Shakespeare Library the nobleman in the Ashbourne Shake-speare ters. That’s what we care about—and, The Ashbourne portrait (owned by the portrait, and which identify him with Edward frankly, we don’t care a fig for those lost th Folger Shakespeare Library) has been a de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford. Further evi- souls who still adhere to the 19 -century point of contention within the Oxfordian dence of this connection is to be found in biographical tradition in which movement for the past 60 years. Romeo and Juliet, where Lady Capulet speaks Shakespeare is a bland, colorless, of a book “That in gold clasps locks in the uncontroversial, boringly predictable golden story”.3 writer of commercial potboilers. These passages in Chapman’s and Shake-speare’s plays add another layer of evidence In fact, if you’ve followed the recent to the January 1940 Scientific American report on Charles Wisner Barrell’s infra red and history of the authorship question in pub- X-ray examination of the Shake-speare Ashbourne portrait—an examination which lications such as the Shakespeare Oxford revealed that the portrait had been over-painted, and beneath the over-painting was the real Newsletter, you’ve noticed that a corre- Shake-speare: Edward de Vere the 17th Earl of Oxford.4 sponding premise—that Edward de Vere The Ashbourne portrait (pictured above) is one of the key points of contention in the was too notorious, by one criteria or an- (Continued on page 12) (Continued on page 3) page 2 Shakespeare Matters Fall 2001 Letters: Fellowship Home Page To the Friends of the Shakespeare Fellow- and discussion boards ship: As part of the establishment of the require signups and passwords. Shakespeare Fellowship, long-time The Fellowship Home Page should be The formation of the Shakespeare Fel- Oxfordian Marty Hyatt has agreed to ad- up and running in its first incarnation by the lowship is, without question, the most ex- minister an Internet discussion bulletin time our first subscribers are reading this. citing development in the Oxfordian move- board as part of the new Shakespeare The page will feature some of the usual fare ment this year. I am enthusiastic about its Fellowship Home Page (located at: for any Internet Home Page, such as FAQs, membership, heartened by the high prin- www.ShakespeareFellowship.orgwww.ShakespeareFellowship.org) links to other sites of interest, and current ciples that have led to its formation, and am Hyatt, along with Shakespeare Matters news on all things Shakespeare and most impressed with the calibre of the co-editor William Boyle, co-founded the Shakespeare-authorship related. people who have spearheaded this effort to first Oxfordian Listserv—Evermore—back One exciting feature that will be avail- rescue our hopes from the despair born of in 1994. Evermore eventually became the able immediately is the full text of J. Tho- the impotence and inaction that have para- Phaeton discussion group, now managed mas Looney’s Shakespeare Identified, avail- lyzed and aborted, for years, so many pos- by Nina Green of Canada. able for searching—and if you wish, down- sibilities and opportunities that might have Hyatt is also responsible for establish- loading. Spread the word! The book, pub- been spawned and succored by its prede- ing the Usenet discussion group lished in 1920, is in the public domain, and cessor organization. humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare in we encourage its distribution to as wide an The Shakespeare Fellowship promises 1995, a group on which authorship is al- audience as possible by anyone wishing to to become an active home and intellectual ways a hotly debated topic. copy it or forward it to a friend. The Fellow- treasury for the nurture and support of Present plans call for the site to have ship will soon be offering its own printed scholarship that one day will lead the world one or two all-comers discussion boards edition of Looney, with an Introduction by to recognize Edward de Vere as the author on the gateway page, accompanied by links Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens. of the Shakespeare canon. to any number of private boards for mem- Look to the Fellowship Page for other With all good wishes and support, bers only, available to explore issues in such online text ventures in the near future, smaller, more focused groups, or available such as Dorothy and Charlton Ogburn’s Professor Daniel Wright for teachers to set up groups for their own This Star of England, and Sir George Director students and other students around the Greenwood’s The Shakespeare Problem The Edward de Vere Studies Conference country. Private boards would, of course, and The Shakespeare Problem Restated. Portland, Oregon 10 September 2001 Shakespeare Matters Subscriptions to Shakespeare Matters are Published quarterly by the $30 per year ($15 for online issues only). To the Editors: The Shakespeare Fellowship Family or institution subscriptions are $45 per year. Patrons of the Fellowship are $75 and up. Send subscription requests to: I for one am quite excited about the Editorial Offices formation of the Shakespeare Fellowship. P.O. Box 263 The Shakespeare Fellowship Somerville, MA 02143 Oxfordians have long needed a forum that P.O. Box 561 Belmont MA 02478 takes advantage of the full capabilities of Co-Editors: the Internet, in terms of research forums, Dr. Roger Stritmatter, William Boyle The purpose of the Shakespeare Fellowship archiving Oxfordian research online, and is to promote public awareness and acceptance generally making the Oxfordian case in a Contributing Editors: of the authorship of the Shakespeare Canon by Mark Anderson, Dr. Charles Berney, Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford (1550- more effective form to a world-wide audi- Charles Boyle, Dr. Felicia Londre, 1604), and further to encourage a high level of ence. There are many projects waiting in Dr. Anne Pluto Elisabeth Sears, scholarly research and publication into all Richard Whalen, Hank Whittemore, the wings for support. aspects of Shakespeare studies, and also into the Dr. Daniel Wright history and culture of the Elizabethan era. The Shakespeare Fellowship promises The Society was founded and incorporated Phone (Somerville, MA): (617) 628-3411 to provide the opportunity for these projects Phone (Northampton, MA): (413) 585-8610 in 2001 in the State of Massachusetts and is to gain the support they need to get off the Fax (Somerville, MA): (617) 628-4258 chartered under the membership corporation ground and make a significant contribu- email: [email protected] laws of that state (nonprofit status pending). All contents copyright ©2001 Dues, grants and contributions are tax- tion to Shakespeare scholarship. The Shakespeare Fellowship deductible to the extent allowed by law. Mark Alexander Shakespeare Matters welcomes articles, essays, commentary, book reviews, letters and news items. Woodside, California Contributions should be reasonably concise and, when appropriate, validated by peer review.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Senses in Early Modern England, 1558–1660
    The senses in early modern England, 1558–1660 Edited by Simon Smith, Jacqueline Watson, and Amy Kenny MANCHESTER 1824 Manchester University Press Simon Smith, Jackie Watson, and Amy Kenny - 9781526146465 www.manchesteruniversitypress.co.ukDownloaded from manchesterhive.com at 09/27/2021 05:33:41PM via free access The senses in early modern England, 1558–1660 Simon Smith, Jackie Watson, and Amy Kenny - 9781526146465 Downloaded from manchesterhive.com at 09/27/2021 05:33:41PM via free access MUP_Smith_Printer.indd 1 02/04/2015 16:18 Simon Smith, Jackie Watson, and Amy Kenny - 9781526146465 Downloaded from manchesterhive.com at 09/27/2021 05:33:41PM via free access MUP_Smith_Printer.indd 2 02/04/2015 16:18 The senses in early modern England, 1558–1660 edited by simon smith, jackie watson and amy kenny Manchester University Press Simon Smith, Jackie Watson, and Amy Kenny - 9781526146465 Downloaded from manchesterhive.com at 09/27/2021 05:33:41PM via free access MUP_Smith_Printer.indd 3 02/04/2015 16:18 Copyright © Manchester University Press 2015 While copyright in the volume as a whole is vested in Manchester University Press, copyright in individual chapters belongs to their respective authors, and no chapter may be reproduced wholly or in part without the express permission in writing of both author and publisher. Published by Manchester University Press Altrincham Street, Manchester M1 7JA www.manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data applied for isbn 978 07190 9158 2 hardback First published 2015 The publisher has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or any third-party internet websites referred to in this book, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Edmund Spenser and Elizabethan Portraiture Author(S): Tarnya Cooper and Andrew Hadfield Source: Renaissance Studies, Vol
    Edmund Spenser and Elizabethan portraiture Author(s): Tarnya Cooper and Andrew Hadfield Source: Renaissance Studies, Vol. 27, No. 3 (JUNE 2013), pp. 407-434 Published by: Wiley Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24420119 Accessed: 09-04-2019 14:13 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Wiley is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Renaissance Studies This content downloaded from 117.240.50.232 on Tue, 09 Apr 2019 14:13:08 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Renaissance Studies Vol. 27 No. 3 DOI: 10.1111/j.l477-4658.2012.00819.x Edmund Spenser and Elizabethan portraiture Tarnya Cooper and Andrew Hadfield Edmund Spenser (1554P-99), although his work is largely the preserve of specialists today, is a recognizable figure from the realms of English Literature from the mid-seventeenth century onwards. He is invariably depicted as a man with a ruff and a neatly clipped beard and, if shown in fuller profile, wearing the doublet and tights that were thought to have been de rigeurat Elizabeth's court. There is no particular distinction between the images produced for a scholarly audience and a more popular one.
    [Show full text]
  • Collaboration Between William Shakespeare and John
    ... H WITH A ‘CO-ADJUTOR’: COLLABORATION ON J D AN E BETWEEN WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE AND R ESPEA K JOHN FLETCHER IN THE TWO NOBLE A H S 1 IAN KINSMEN LL I W EEN Com “ajudante”: colaboração entre William W BET Shakespeare e John Ffletcher em Os dois primos ATION R nobres ABO LL O ’: C R UTO DJ A - O C ‘ A H IT . W B José Roberto Basto O’Shea* , J. R. EA H S ’ O RESUMO O presente ensaio visa sintetizar, criticamente, o conhecimento existente acerca da controversa questão da colaboração no contexto teatral elisabetano-jaimesco, em geral, e no caso da composição da peça Os Dois Primos Nobres (1613-1614), especificamente. Recorrendo a seis procedimentos distintos atualmente empregados por especialistas para verificar e aferir autoria e coautoria, o ensaio conclui em favor de inquestionável colaboração entre William Shakespeare, veterano dramaturgo da companhia The King’s Men, e John Fletcher, dramaturgo iniciante junto à mesma companhia à época. Palavras-chave: colaboração; coautoria; Shakespeare; Fletcher; Os Dois Primos Nobres. 1 This essay was researched at the Folger Shakespeare Library, in Washington, DC, in 2013, while the author held a short-term Folger fellowship. * Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). REVISTA LETRAS, CURITIBA, N. 92 P. 49-65, JUL/DEZ. 2015. ISSN 2236-0999 (VERSÃO ELETRÔNICA) 49 O’SHEA, J. R. B. WITH A ‘CO-ADJUTOR’: COLLABORATION BETWEEN WILLIAN SHAKESPEARE AND JONH... ABSTRACT This essay attempts critically to synthesize existing knowled- ge as regards the controversial issue of collaboration in the Elizabethan-Jacobean theatrical context, in general, and in the case of the composition of the play The Two Noble Kinsmen (1613-1614), in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • English Renaissance Literature Clark Library UCLA
    English Renaissance Literature Clark Library UCLA 1. Shakespeare: 14 seventeenth-century quartos (including 6 Pavier quartos), all 4 folios (one 1st, seven 2nd, three 3rd, four 4th folios), 1640 Poems, 9 apocryphal quartos. Extensive collection of Restoration and C18th adaptations/editions of Shakespeare. William Henry Ireland forged Shakespeare annotations (in a printed book from 1592). 2. Shakespeare’s Contemporaries: 215 additional pre-1660 quarto and octavo playbooks, including plays by George Chapman, Ben Jonson, Thomas Heywood, Thomas Dekker, Beaumont and Fletcher and others. 3. Chrzanowski Collection of Shakespearean Source Material: books that either provide direct sources for Shakespeare’s plays or situate his work within broader cultural, intellectual, historical, religious, and social contexts. Collection particularly strong in sixteenth-century English chronicle histories, devotional material (including Bibles), and literary sources. Some of the authors represented include Montaigne (Florio), Ascham, Lodge, Topsell, Markham, Hakluyt, Foxe, Elyot, Marlowe, Brandt, Sidney, and Ariosto (Harington). 4. Additional Pre-1660 English Material: William Andrews Clark Jr. started his book collection with high points of British literature, but with a heavy focus on Elizabethan and early Jacobean authors. Thus the collection includes additional pre-1660 English books beyond Shakespeare, early modern drama, and the Chrzanowksi collection, including authors such as John Heywood, Thomas Coryate, Richard Brathwaite, John Donne, George Herbert, Joseph Hall, and John Selden, among many others. The Harmsworth Theological Collection also contains a large amount of sixteenth- century English religious polemic. 5. English Manuscripts: Though the bulk of the Clark’s English manuscript material dates to 1640- 1800, there are earlier manuscripts in the collection, including a heraldic MS from 1596 (part of the Chrzanowski collection) and John Selden’s university notebook.
    [Show full text]
  • John Ford's Theatre of Ceremony: a Formal Study of His Five Major Plays
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1982 John Ford's Theatre of Ceremony: A Formal Study of His Five Major Plays Chikako D. Kumamoto Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Kumamoto, Chikako D., "John Ford's Theatre of Ceremony: A Formal Study of His Five Major Plays" (1982). Dissertations. 2075. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2075 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1982 Chikako D. Kumamoto JOHN FORD'S THEATRE OF CEREMONY: A FORMAL STUDY OF HIS FIVE MAJOR PLAYS By Chikako D. Kumamoto A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 1982 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank the members of my dissertation committee, Professors Anthony LaBranche, Suzanne Gossett, Bernard McElroy, and James Rocks, whose wisdom, knowledge, and goodwill were an invaluable help, and whose dedication to scholarship was a constant source of inspiration to me. They supported my efforts, on and off the campus, with patience, understanding, and intellectual precision which mark the core of their professional and humanistic concerns. I respectfully extend to them my permanent and deepest gratitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Thesis
    Courtly Mirrors: The Politics of Chapman’s Drama Shona McIntosh, M.A. (Hons), M.Phil. Submitted in fulfilment of the degree requirements for a Doctorate in Philosophy to the University of Glasgow Department of English Literature, Faculty of Arts November 2008 2 Contents Abstract .................................................................................................. 4 Acknowledgements.................................................................................. 5 Author’s declaration ................................................................................ 6 Abbreviations .......................................................................................... 7 Chapter 1................................................................................................ 8 ‘Spirit to Dare and Power to Doe’: George Chapman at the Jacobean Court ............................................................................................................... 8 Modern Literary Criticism and George Chapman’s Drama .................. 14 General Studies of Chapman’s Drama............................................. 14 Chapman’s Ethics and Philosophy .................................................. 19 Political Readings of Chapman’s Work............................................. 27 Court Masques and Court Politics ................................................... 35 Themes of Sexuality and Gender in Chapman Criticism .................. 36 Text and Canon: Authorship, Dating and Source Material ............... 38 Radical
    [Show full text]
  • George Chapman;
    MERMAID SERIES, THE BEST TLtdYS OF THE OLD V^c4^Ic4TISTS GEORGE CHAPMAN W.L. PHELPS /J^^O. THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE ?^m^ THE mE'BJMQAIT> SERIES The Best Plays of the Old Dramatists -i" aXsX—^..|^— }<^>o-;- George Chapman THE MERMAID SERIES. THE BEST PLA YS OF THE OLD DRAMATISTS LITERAL RErKODUCTIONS OF THE OLD TEXT. THE BEST PLAYS OP CHRIS- THE COMPLETE PLAYS OF JOPHER MARLOWE. Edited, WILLIAM CONGREVE. Edited with Critical Memoir and Notes, by Alex. C. Ewald. by Havelock Ellis ; and contain- ing a General Introduction to . the Series by John Addington THE BEST OP SVMONDS. PLAYS WEB- STER and TOURNEUR. With II. an Introduction and Notes by THE BEST PLAYS of THOMAS J(jh.\ .-Xddi.ngtdn' Symonus. O'rW'AY. Introduction and Notes by the Hon. Kodex Noki.. XIII. & XIV. THE BEST PLAYS of THOMAS III. .MIDDLETON. With an Intro- THE BEST PLAYS OF JOHN duction by Alger.non Charles FORD. Edited by Havei.ock; SwiNliURNE. Ellis. IV. S; V. THE BEST PLAYS OF PHILIP THE BEST PLAYS OP JAMBS MASSINC.Kk. With Critical and SHIRLEY. With Introduction by BioRraphical Essay and Notes by Edmund Gosse. Arthur Symons. VI. THE BEST PLAYS of THOMAS of THE BEST PLAYS THOMAS DEKKER. Introductory Essay HEYWOOD. Edited by A. W. and Notes by Ernest Rhys. Verity. With Introduction by J. Symonds. Addington XVII. VII. THE BEST PLAYS OF BEN THE COMPLETE PLAYS OF JONSON. Fir.st .Series. Edited WILLIAM WVCHERLEY. by Brinsley Nicholson, M.D. Edited, with Introduction and XVIII. Notes, by W. C. Waku.
    [Show full text]
  • So We Are Talking Roughly About Twenty‐Five Years of Theatre. Roughly, Because the Tendencies That Characteriz
    So we are talking roughly about twenty‐five years of theatre. Roughly, because the tendencies that characterize Jacobean theatre started before James I came to the throne (1603, died 1625) around the year 1599 – the year when the Lord Chamberlain’s Men relocated their theatre from Shoreditch to Southwark (on the southern bank of the Thames) and called it “The Globe”, the year when the private theatre of Paul’s boys was reopened, and a little later the Lord Chamberlain’s Men got hold of the Blackfriars theatre. These developments brought about an unprecedented avalanche of play‐writing and dramaturgical innovation that made the Jacobean period one of the most dynamic and spectacular periods in theatre history as we know it. The period also established a new generation of playwrights: the most prominent of whom are Ben Jonson, John Marston, George Chapman, Thomas Middleton, John Webster, Francis Beaumont and John Fletcher – who worked alongside, competed with, collaborated and learned from William Shakespeare – the major figure that continued to sway the English stage from the Elizabethan well into the Jacobean period. 1 Of course, at the beginning of the period the most successful playwright in London was Shakespeare. So far, his fame rested mainly on the series of history plays: the two tetralogies (Henry VI, Parts I‐III and Richard III; and Richard II, Henry IV, Parts I‐II and Henry V) and King John; and his witty romantic comedies that Queen Elizabeth reportedly liked so much: e.g. Love’s Labour’s Lost, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Much Ado About Nothing, As You Like It.
    [Show full text]
  • Staging Mist-Fog
    Mist and Fog on the Elizabethan and Jacobean Stage Alan C. Dessen [Speaking Pictures: The Visual/Verbal Nexus of Dramatic Performance, ed. Virginia Mason Vaughan, Fernando Cioni, and Jacquelyn Bessell (Fairleigh Dickinson UP, 2010), pp. 106-118] In more than thirty years of hand-to-hand combat with the surviving evidence I have encountered many differences between the sense of theatre taken for granted today and the logic of presentation in the age of Shakespeare, but the most telling distinction remains the approach to staging night and darkness. As I have argued at length,1 to convey “night” today most directors use lighting to establish stage darkness and then have actors enter carrying torches, groping in the dark, or unable to see something of importance; we thereby start with a verisimilar stage night as a justification for confusion in the dark. But an Elizabethan or Jacobean dramatic company would have used dialogue, torches, nightgowns, groping in the dark, and failures in “seeing” - all presented in full light - to establish the illusion of darkness for a playgoer who would infer night from such signals and onstage behavior. From such a distinction emerges a fundamental difference in theatrical logic. For us, the lighting technician supplies night and the actors perform accordingly; for them, the actors provided the signals and the audience cooperated in supplying the darkness. For us, one figure fails to see another because the stage is dark; for them, one figure failed to see another and therefore the stage was assumed to be dark. Our theatrical sense of cause-and-effect (the stage is dark, therefore a given action took place) may then at times be inappropriate or misleading.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1. Ben Jonson, ‘Epitaph on S. P. a Child of Q. El. Chappel’, in Ben Jonson, ed. C. H. Herford, Percy Simpson and Evelyn Simpson, 11 vols (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925–52), VIII (1947), p. 77, ll. 1–5. Further references are given in the text. 2. For example, Michael Shapiro, Children of the Revels: The Boy Companies of Shakespeare’s Time and their Plays (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977), p. 104; Glynne Wickham, Herbert Berry and William Ingram, eds, English Professional Theatre, 1530–1660 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 268. 3. See Claire Busse, ‘Pretty Fictions and Little Stories’, in Childhood and Children’s Books in Early Modern Europe, 1550–1800, ed. Andrea Immel and Michael Witmore (London: Routledge, 2006), pp. 75–102 (p. 75). 4. See David Kathman, ‘How Old Were Shakespeare’s Boy Actors?’, Shakespeare Survey, 58 (2005), 220–46 (p. 223). 5. See Philippe Ariès, Centuries of Childhood (New York: Vintage, 1962), pp. 36–7. 6. For ease of reference I will generally refer to ‘the Children of the Queen’s Revels’, but I will use the title appropriate to a particular historical moment when discussing a specific event. 7. See Shapiro, Children of the Revels, p. 104; Shen Lin, “How Old were the Children of Paul’s?”, Theatre Notebook, 45 (1991), 121–31. 8. See Linda Austern, ‘Thomas Ravenscroft: Musical Chronicler of an Elizabethan Theatre Company’, Journal of American Musicological Society, 38 (1985), 238–63; W. Reavley Gair, ‘Chorister-Actors at Paul’s’, Notes and Queries, 25 (1978), 440–1; Lin, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 16 April 2018 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Ravelhofer, B. (2016) 'Shirley's tragedies.', in James Shirley and early modern theatre : new critical perspectives. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, pp. 86-107. Studies in performance and early modern drama. Further information on publisher's website: https://www.routledge.com/9781472480361 Publisher's copyright statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge in James Shirley and Early Modern Theatre: New Critical Perspectives on 06/10/2016, available online: http://www.routledge.com/9781472480361 Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Shirley’s Tragedies Barbara Ravelhofer Shirley is perhaps best noted for his comedic elegance, yet it was a tragedy, The Cardinal, which the author himself deemed ‘the best of my flock’.1 In the course of his long career, Shirley wrote five tragedies — The Maid’s Revenge (1626), Love’s Cruelty (1631), The Traitor (1631), The Politician (c.
    [Show full text]
  • “Hand Hand Shooke”: Compassionate Touch in George Chapman's <I
    Quidditas Volume 31 Article 8 2010 “Hand Hand Shooke”: Compassionate Touch in George Chapman’s Hero and Leander Patricia Davis Patrick Brigham Young University, Hawaii Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, History Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Renaissance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Patrick, Patricia Davis (2010) "“Hand Hand Shooke”: Compassionate Touch in George Chapman’s Hero and Leander," Quidditas: Vol. 31 , Article 8. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra/vol31/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Quidditas by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Quidditas 160 “Hand Hand Shooke”: Compassionate Touch in George Chapman’s Hero and Leander Patricia Davis Patrick Brigham Young University, Hawaii Chapman begins his continuation of Marlowe’s Hero and Leander by announcing that he intends to “censure the delights” which the lovers have enjoyed without the sanction of ceremony. However, the narrator does not maintain this attitude of stern judgment. As readers of Chapman’s Hero and Leander have often noticed, the narrator continuously shifts his tone, sometimes censuring the lovers and sometimes sympathizing with them. Chapman’s poem is thus as deeply concerned with the problem of appropriate compassion as it is with the containment of Eros. The narrator’s vacillation between censure and compassion can be fruitfully considered by examining early modern understanding of the passions as contagious. Compassion is a matter of being literally touched by the emotions of others.
    [Show full text]