Foucault and Literature: Finitude, Feigning, Fabulation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Foucault and Literature: Finitude, Feigning, Fabulation by Ryan Devitt A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English Language and Literature Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2014 © Ryan Devitt 2014 I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract The dissertation is composed of two related parts, each applying aspects of Michel Foucault's thought to contemporary American avant-garde writing. Part One brings together Foucault's neglected early essays on literature, reading them against the backdrop of the major works published during this period (1961-1966) and deducing from them a method and framework of interpretation, which I call feigning. Feigning, in turn, reveals the themes common to Foucault's early work: finitude as a strict limit, the sovereignty of language as proof of this limit, and repetition as 1) the proof of sovereignty, but also 2) the form of an incredible experience that disrupts the origin, calls being into question, and requires a complete openness to the "irreducible enigma the world conceals" (Legros 111). Feigning as such is applied to contemporary works of American "fabulation" by Robert Coover, John Barth, and Donald Barthelme. My reading of these authors demonstrates the reach and relevance of feigning as a rich, complex method of interpretation that is not limited to the French avant-garde of the mid-twentieth century. Part Two of the dissertation reevaluates the method of feigning according to Foucault's return to art and writing in his final work. Here, literature functions not simply as an "experience of the outside" that casts everything in doubt, but serves instead as equipment and aid in the critical, careful assessment of the formation of self. Renewing the themes of Part One and drawing on the pure research of Foucault's final lectures, I argue for the potential of feigning as an "art of life" that bears upon the cultivation of attitude and ēthos. iii Acknowledgments Thank you to the faculty and staff of the English department at the University of Waterloo for support and for opportunities, both professional and financial, during the dissertation process and throughout my graduate studies. I would like to acknowledge the generous financial support of the Srivistava Family, Wayne C. Fox, the University of Waterloo President's Graduate Scholarship program, the Ontario Graduate Scholarship program, and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Doctoral Fellowship program. I would like to offer special, heartfelt thanks to my supervisor, Professor Michael MacDonald, for introducing me to Foucault's rich, complex essays on literature, for his wonderful support and guidance throughout the writing process, and for his tireless administrative efforts on my behalf over the last several years. I could not have written this dissertation without the confidence and the space for intellectual enquiry that Michael has provided. Thank you to my readers, Professors Murray McArthur and Ken Hirschkop, for helping me further develop and improve the dissertation. Their remarks and insight are invaluable. Special thanks are due to my father-in-law, Professor Kieran Bonner – my unofficial advisor in all things academic and intellectual. Kieran's guidance and support throughout the PhD was indispensible, and he remains my most valuable and important interlocutor. Dr. Sholom Glouberman also deserves special thanks for his ongoing iv interest in my work and for his support, both intellectual and financial, over the last several years. Thank you, finally, to my family – both the Devitts and the Bonners – for all your love and understanding. And most important of all, thank you to my wife, Róisín, to whom this work is dedicated. v Dedication To my wife, Róisín, who patiently listened to every word of this dissertation (and a good deal more besides), whose love made this work possible, and whose wit made it better. vi Contents Introduction 1 Part One Chapter One Foucault, Finitude, Feigning 24 Chapter Two Feigning and Fabulation 61 Part Two Chapter Three The Return to Art in Foucault's Last Works 99 Chapter Four Feigning as an Art of Life 140 Conclusion 178 Works Cited 201 vii Introduction "Just as there had been a Foucault who seemed likely to become a psychologist or psychiatrist, there was now a Foucault who seemed likely to become a major literary critic." – David Macey, The Lives of Michel Foucault "I wonder if it is not possible to construct or, at the very least, to outline from a distance an ontology of literature." – Michel Foucault, "Language to Infinity" "Through literature, the being of language shines once more on the frontiers of Western culture….This is why literature is appearing more and more as that which must be thought." – Michel Foucault, The Order of Things Even a cursory reading of Michel Foucault's work reveals a deep and abiding interest in literature – an interest that he pursued with vigor throughout the 1960s. And yet, few scholars have attended to the writing of this period, which includes not only essays on the literature of Friedrich Hölderlin, Raymond Roussel, Claude-Prosper Crébillon, Georges Bataille, Alain Robbe-Grillet, Gustave Flaubert, Pierre Klossowski, Stéphane Mallarmé, Jules Verne, and Maurice Blanchot; but also roundtable discussions of literature for radio La Chaîne Nationale and radio France Culture; and presentations and debates organized by Philippe Sollers and the influential authors and critics of Tel Quel. My dissertation aims to address this lacuna in the vast body of Foucault scholarship by attending to this considerable and rich collection of work, which constitutes nothing less than an oeuvre. 1 Of course, references to Foucault abound in humanities scholarship, where his name has become the simple, transparent sign of intellectual relevance (a sign often deployed, nevertheless, without any rigor since much of his oeuvre remains ignored and his most cited works so often misread). And, on the other hand, no university course in literary criticism or theory is complete without reference to The History of Sexuality or Discipline and Punish, or else to New Historicism and Stephen Greenblatt's Renaissance Self-Fashioning, which stands as the singular proof that Foucault indeed offers something substantial to the study of literature. And yet, despite Foucault's status as the most cited author in the humanities1 – or despite the now orthodox position of his work (or rather, a segment of his work) as literary theory – hardly anything at all has been thought or said about his early engagement with literature or his actual works of literary criticism.2 There are, however, a few notable exceptions. Simon During, for example, offers an admirable summary of the early work, including Foucault's book on Roussel (Death and the Labyrinth, 1963) and his essays on Bataille ("Preface to Transgression," 1963), Klossowski ("Prose of Acteon," 1964), and Blanchot ("Thought of the Outside," 1966). David Carroll discusses this same work at some length, and from a critical perspective, as part of the broader argument of Paraesthetics. More recently, Timothy O'Leary's Foucault and Fiction offers a comprehensive, erudite interpretation of Foucault's early engagement with literature, interspersed with readings of Irish authors from Jonathan Swift to Seamus Heaney (though these latter often appear incidental to the writing on Foucault). And a handful of journal articles and book chapters, published over the last few decades, consider either certain aspects of Foucault's literary work (Timothy Rayner on "Thought of the Outside" and "Behind the Fable," Pierre Macherey on Death and the 2 Labyrinth, Kas Saghafi on Foucault and Blanchot) or else take some position on the general category of "Foucault and literature" (Jon Simons, Dieter Freundlieb, Jacob Fisher, John Rajchman). And yet, the tendency, with each of these studies, is always the same: to read Foucault's earlier, lesser known writing according to the later historiographies and so to project the later forms of critique backward onto the literature essays, reading the latter as the nascent or partial (and hence non-serious) version of the former. My dissertation, on the other hand, offers an original reading by taking Foucault's early works of literary criticism completely seriously – that is, by interpreting them at the level of their argument and by bringing them together in a general method of interpretation, which is formed and refined throughout the following chapters according to both my reading of Foucault's work and through application to works of literature other than those discussed by Foucault. This method, which I call feigning, is outlined below, along with a consideration of its originality and an overview of its application. Of course, a reading as such need not separate the engagement with literature from Foucault's broader intellectual project. On the contrary, the dissertation hopes to foreground precisely their complementary argument and themes, which are especially apparent in Foucault's early critique of finitude and his final turn to the Greeks and the care of the self. My intention here is not to establish, once more, the early work as the non-serious preliminary of a more robust and valid oeuvre but rather to maintain the direction and force of its argument by appealing to the later work and attending to issues that remain after Foucault's turn from literature. This aspect of the project, which composes the second half of the dissertation, is also outlined below. 3 Feigning as a Method of Interpretation Feigning is not a term that Foucault uses. He never refers to its etymology, to its relation to fiction or fate or fable, or to its potential as a method of criticism or as an art of life.