FY 2017-20 TIP Appendix

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FY 2017-20 TIP Appendix TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX H i Memphis MPO FY 2017-20 Transportation Improvement Program Program Improvement Transportation 2017-20 FYMPO Memphis Memphis MPO Contact Information: 125 North Main St., Suite # 450 Memphis, TN 38103 Ph. (901) 576-7190 Fax. (901) 576-7272 This document is available in accessible formats when requested ten (10) days in advance. This document was prepared and published by the Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and is prepared in cooperation with financial assistance from all or several of the following public entities: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Federal Highway Administra- tion (FHWA), the Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT), the Mississippi Department of Transportation (MDOT), and local governments in in the Metropolitan Planning Area. This financial assistance notwithstanding, the contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of the funding agencies. It is the policy of the Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization not to discriminate on the basis of age, sex, race, color, national origin or disability in its hiring or employment practices, or in its admission to or operations of its program, services, or activities. All inquiries for Title VI and/or the American Disabilities Act, contact Mitchell Lloyd at 901-576-7146 or [email protected]. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OFCONTENTS Appendix A Construction Set-Aside List ……………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………1 Appendix B FY 2017-20 TIP Policy and Memorandum of Agreement for TIP Amendment/Adjustment Procedures………...…..……………...2 Appendix C Funding Provisions in the FAST Act and Additional Notes……….…………………………………..…………………………………17 Appendix D Project Ranking Criteria and Supporting Documents……………………………………………………………………………………28 Appendix E Status of Projects in FY 2014-17 TIP…………………………………………….……...…………………………………………...…...40 APPENDIX A Appendix F Public Involvement Process………….………………………………………………..……………………………………………………54 Appendix G FY 2017-20 TIP Local STBG Projects and Rankings …………………………………….…….………..……………………….…….69 Appendix H Statewide Grouping Descriptions—TDOT………….…………………………………………………………………………..…………74 APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY 2017-20 Transportation Improvement Program i APPENDIX-A Construction Set-Aside Project List Table A-1: Local Tennessee Fiscally Constrained Construction Set-Aside Projects Tennessee TABLE OFCONTENTS Fiscally Constrained Construction Set-Aside Projects Project Name Agency FY Federal Funds Airline Road North Widening Arlington 2018 $3,412,800 APPENDIX A Hwy 70 at Jetway Road Improvements Arlington 2018 $1,054,400 Old Brownsville Road Bartlett 2018 $18,400,000 Germantown Road at Wolf River Blvd Intersection Germantown 2018 $1,400,000 Elvis Presley Blvd Memphis 2017 $3,160,000 Holmes Road East Memphis 2017 $5,034,000 APPENDIX B Homes Road West Memphis 2017 $10,397,280 Total $42,858,480 Table A-2: Local Mississippi Fiscally Constrained Construction Set-Aside Projects Mississippi APPENDIX C Fiscally Constrained Construction Set-Aside Projects Project Name Agency FY Federal Funds Pleasant Hill Road Widening Olive Branch 2019 $5,148,000 Total $5,148,000 Table A-3: Local Tennessee Illustrative Project List for Construction Set-Aside APPENDIX D Tennessee Illustrative Project List for Construction Set-Aside Project Name Agency Federal Funds Donelson Farms Parkway Arlington $3,183,200 APPENDIX E Kirby/ Whitten Parkway (Shelby Farms Parkway) Memphis $12,000,000 Plough Blvd Memphis $28,000,000 Union Avenue Complete Street Memphis $10,560,000 Forest Hill Irene Memphis $12,584,937 Walnut Grove Road East Memphis $7,161,876 APPENDIX F Navy Road Streetscape Phase II Millington $1,520,000 Raleigh Millington Road at 385 Intersection Improvements Millington $459,200 Walnut Grove Road Widening Shelby County $8,587,500 Hacks Cross Road Improvements Shelby County $14,400,000 APPENDIX G Total $98,456,713 Table A-4: Local Tennessee Illustrative Project List for Construction Set-Aside Mississippi Illustrative Project List for Construction Set-Aside Project Name Agency Federal Funds APPENDIX H Commerce Street Extension DeSoto County $2,446,400 McIngvale Widening and Realignment Hernando $7,152,000 Total $9,598,400 * If a project on the illustrative list project list meets the conditions outlined in the FY 2017-20 TIP policy showing readiness to go to construction, then an amendment could be made to replace a project on the construction set-aside list. 1 Memphis MPO FY 2017-20 Transportation Improvement Program TABLE OFCONTENTS APPENDIX-B FY 2017‐2020 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Policy 1. Minimum Eligibility Requirements At a minimum, projects submitted to the Memphis MPO must be in the Memphis Urban Area’s Livability 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and can include projects eligible for Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG) funding that supports the goals and objec- tives of the RTP. Additionally, the lead agency must work through their internal process to secure the 20% matching funds needed. APPENDIX A 2. Commitment to Implement Project and Project Delays The submission and approval of a request using STBG funds shall constitute a commitment to complete the project in a timely manner as described in the application form by the project’s lead agency. Any part of the project scope credited in awarding evaluation points becomes a permanent part of the project scope and must be implemented. APPENDIX B To ensure that all allocated funds made available to the Memphis MPO are used, all lead agencies with funding requests will work with ap- propriate DOTs and the Memphis MPO to ensure that all State and federal requirements are met, and that the project follows the program- ming schedule in the TIP. APPENDIX C The Memphis MPO will program STBG funds for any transportation projects over a 4‐year period within the TIP. Each phase of a project should be obligated by the end of the federal fiscal year (September 30) designated in the TIP. A delay is defined as a situation where a project’s federal funding is not obligated in the fiscal year identified in the TIP. After the first delay, the MPO staff will report to the Engineer- ing and Technical Committee (ETC) and the Transportation Policy Board (TPB), the projects using programmed STBG funds, that have not received obligation and the reason for the delay. A second delay will occur 8 weeks prior to the MPO’s 2nd Quarter ETC meeting. At this APPENDIX D time MPO Staff will begin the amendment process to remove the subsequent phases from the TIP at the 2nd Quarter ETC and TPB meet- ing’s (see example below). After the second delay only the first phase of work will remain in the TIP and all other phases will be removed from the TIP. Project delays will be reviewed to determine if it is a result of the project approval process through the State DOTs and special consideration will be given in such cases. Project delays will be considered as part of the development of future TIP cycles and points will be awarded to projects that have received timely obligation. For projects that have only one phase identified in the TIP, the second delay APPENDIX E will be documented and taken into consideration when programming funds for future TIP cycles. Projects using Transportation Alternatives (TA) funds will also be tracked and any project delays will be reported to the ETC and TPB. For Tennessee projects, the obligation deadline for TA funds is July 1st, approximately 2 years and 9 months after the last day of the fiscal year for which the funds were authorized. The lead agency is required to contact the MPO staff, a minimum of 6 months prior to the potential APPENDIX F expiration date of any TA funds for a project. The MPO staff, at this time, will determine if there is another project in the TIP that is both ready for obligation and meets the eligibility criteria for the TA funds. In this case the funding source for the projects, if agreed upon by MPO staff, TDOT, and the lead agencies, could be swapped. For Mississippi projects, obligation of TA funds will be tracked as part of the regularly scheduled TIP project status meetings. For both Tennessee and Mississippi, the lead agency should keep the MPO staff informed of any delays in the obligation of TA funds. APPENDIX G Please be aware if any project does not get started in a 10 year time period, then the lead agency will be responsible for reimbursing the federal funds as required under Section 102(b) of Title 23, United States Code (U.S.C.). The Memphis MPO staff will track projects quarter- ly and record the funds that are obligated on the project TIP pages. APPENDIX H Example: A project is included in the FY 2017-20 TIP with funding designated for PE-D for FY 2017 and ROW for FY 2019. If the funds for the PE-D phase are not obligated by September 30, 2017 then the project will receive its first delay and MPO staff will report to the ETC and TPB the reason for the delay. If the funds for PE-D are not obligated, eight weeks prior to the MPO’s 2nd Quarter ETC meeting, then the PE -D phase would stay in the TIP but the future phase for ROW would be removed and the funds would be returned to the MPO’s total availa- ble balance. Memphis MPO FY 2017-20 Transportation Improvement Program 2 3. Carryover Projects Projects carried over to future TIPs must be re-submitted for inclusion. Carry-over projects will be given priority within the project application and ranking process if the project has shown timely obligation of the phases included within the previous TIP. 4. Overmatching Funds Projects seeking additional points by providing more than the required 20% match will be required to provide documentation, such as a TABLE OFCONTENTS signed letter from the Mayor, CIP page, or resolution from local legislative board.
Recommended publications
  • Multi‐Disciplinary Commentaries on a Blueprint for Prosperity
    June 2015 Multi‐disciplinary Commentaries on a Blueprint for Prosperity Foreword The City of Memphis’ Blue Print for Prosperity is a city initiated effort to partner with other local initiatives, organizations and agencies to increase the wealth among low income citizens, increase their resiliency to meet daily financial exigencies and reduce poverty. A number of factors contribute to those challenges. Thus any successful effort to address them requires a multidisciplinary approach. In June 2014, a set of researchers at the University of Memphis across a range of academic colleges and departments was invited to discuss approaches to wealth creation and poverty reduction for the various perspectives of their various disciplines. Based on that conversation, they were asked to submit policy briefs from those perspectives with recommendations to contribute to a community process to produce a plan for action. The following report summarizes and provides those briefs. Participants in the report and their contributions include: David Cox, Ph.D., Department of Public and Nonprofit Administration, School of Urban Affairs and Public Policy, College of Arts and Sciences. Project Director Debra Bartelli, DrPH., Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health. Health Care/Mental Health and Wellness Strand Cyril Chang, Ph.D., Department of Economics, Fogelman School of Business and Economics. Health Care/Mental Health and Wellness Strand Beverly Cross, Ph.D., Department of Instruction and Curriculum Leadership, College of Education, Health and Human Sciences. Education and Early Development Strand Elena Delevega, Ph.D., Department of Social Work, School of Urban Affairs and Public Policy, College of Arts and Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • SHELBY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Van D
    THIS PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT IS DATED JANUARY 23, 2019 NEW ISSUE - BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: See “RATINGS” herein. In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing laws, regulations, rulings, and judicial decisions and assuming the accuracy of certain representations and continuous compliance with certain covenants described herein, interest on the Series 2019 Bonds (defined below) is excludable from gross income under federal income tax laws pursuant to Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended to the date of delivery of the Series 2019 Bonds, and such interest is not a specific preference item for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax. Bond Counsel is further of the opinion that, under existing law, the Series 2019 Bonds and the income therefrom shall be free from all state, county and municipal taxation in the State of Tennessee, except inheritance, transfer and estate taxes, and Tennessee franchise and excise taxes. For a more complete description, see “TAX MATTERS” herein. SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE $170,865,000* $72,460,000* GENERAL OBLIGATION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS, AND SCHOOL BONDS, 2019 SERIES A 2019 SERIES B Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As shown on the inside cover This Official Statement relates to the issuance by the County of Shelby, Tennessee (the “County”) of $170,865,000* in aggregate principal amount of General Obligation Public Improvement and School Bonds, 2019 Series A (the “Series 2019A Bonds”) and $72,460,000* in aggregate principal amount of General Obligation Refunding Bonds, 2019 Series B (the “Series 2019B Bonds”, and together with the Series 2019A Bonds the “Series 2019 Bonds”).
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Operating Environment
    MEMPHIS AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY TRANSIT OPERATING ENVIRONMENT June 16, 2011 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 2 AGENCY OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 1 Organizational and Institutional Structure ................................................................................................. 2 3 TRANSIT SERVICES ............................................................................................................................... 2 Fixed Route Bus Service .......................................................................................................................... 2 Rail Trolley Service ................................................................................................................................... 6 Paratransit Service (MATAplus) ................................................................................................................ 7 Special Event Shuttle Service ................................................................................................................... 7 4 PASSENGER FARES .............................................................................................................................. 7 Fixed-Route Bus Fares ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fy 2018 Business Plan
    Dallas Area Rapid Transit FY 2018 BUSINESS PLAN Including FY 2018 Annual Budget and Twenty-Year Financial Plan FY 2018 Business Plan L4.indd 1 7/31/17 9:40 AM DART BOARD MEMBERS Sue Bauman Dallas Catherine Cuellar Dallas and Cockrell Hill Mark C. Enoch Garland, Rowlett and Glenn Heights Tim A. Hayden Carrollton and Irving Ray Jackson Dallas Jonathan R. Kelly Garland Patrick Kennedy Dallas Jon-Bertrell Killen Dallas Michele Wong Krause Dallas Amanda Moreno Dallas Gary Slagel Richardson, University Park, Addison and Highland Park Rick Stopfer Irving Dominique Torres Dallas Paul N. Wageman Plano Faye Moses Wilkins Plano and Farmers Branch FY 2018 Business Plan L4.indd 2 7/31/17 9:40 AM FY 2018 Business Plan (09/26/17) How to Use This Book What’s in this Book This book contains the Business Plan for Fiscal Year 2018 (FY 2018 – which ends September 30, 2018) for Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART or the Agency). The Business Plan provides the DART Board of Directors, customers, taxpayers, elected officials, and other stakeholder groups of our region with a comprehensive summary of the Agency's plans and commitments to improve regional mobility, enhance the quality of life, and stimulate economic development. This document consolidates the key elements of the FY 2018 Annual Budget, the FY 2018 Twenty-Year Financial Plan, the Transit System Plan, and the Agency's Strategic Plan. A summary of the information contained in the various sections follows. The formal Letter of Transmittal summarizes priorities and issues for the upcoming year. The section titled Who We Are should help those not familiar with DART to understand the basis from which the Agency operates.
    [Show full text]
  • KINGS of the HILL Union Leaders Plan Next Steps After Voters OK Sales Tax Hike
    Public Records & Notices View a complete day’s public records and notices at memphisdailynews.com. www.chandlerreports.com Tuesday, October 8, 2019 MemphisDailyNews.com Vol. 134 | No. 160 Rack–50¢/Delivery–39¢ Fire, police KINGS OF THE HILL union leaders plan next steps after voters OK sales tax hike YOLANDA JONES Courtesy of The Daily Memphian Fire and police union officials plan next week to begin hashing out details about implementing the half-cent sales tax increase approved by voters Thursday to restore benefits and pensions. “Monday morning, we are going to sit down and create our team as we move from campaign mode to phase 2,” said John Covington, the Chief Steward for the Memphis Police Association. “Sources are telling me that city government is ready to sit down and figure out all the things that need to be worked out to implement everything. “Right now, we are catching our breath and get- ting ourselves together. Our point of view is the real work starts Monday. We want to make sure we do it right – dot all the I’s and cross all the T’s, so that’s where we are right now.” Covington said no meetings have been set with city officials yet and that union officials plan to meet with their attorney next week to discuss next steps. A half-century after road builders created a nine-acre mound for a Crosstown section of Interstate 40 that was never built, the “Our next step is then to reach out to council city now has two developers working together on a plan for the “Crosstown Mound.” (Jim Weber/Courtesy of The Daily Memphian) members and the city and go from there,” Coving- ton said.
    [Show full text]
  • Uptown West Master Plan
    Uptown West Master Plan Prepared for: US Army Corps of Engineers (Memphis District) :: Riverfront Development Corporation :: Memphis and Shelby County Community Redevelopment Agency :: Memphis Housing Authority. Prepared by: Looney Ricks Kiss, in conjunction with The Pickering Firm :: Alta Planning + Design :: Blair Parker Design :: Powers Hill Design Memphis, Tennessee :: August 27, 2012 Executive Summary In 2011, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Memphis District) along with the Riverfront Development Client Corporation (RDC) and Memphis and Shelby County Community Redevelopment Agency, commissioned a Master Plan for the western portion of the Uptown neighborhood near downtown Riverfront Development Corporation Memphis, Tennessee. Herein referred to as Uptown West (a working name for the purposes of this plan), this area represents a significant opportunity for redevelopment and reinvestment in the core of Memphis. US Army Corps of Engineers – Memphis District This report summarizes the findings of a year-long process to identify potential long-term public and private improvements for Uptown West, and how those improvements can best be arranged to promote Memphis and Shelby County Community the most active, sustainable, safe and desirable Uptown West area. The master planning process consisted Redevelopment Agency of research, public input, analysis, and design. Memphis Housing Authority & City Prior riverfront studies and improvements have been instrumental in creating more than 12 miles of of Memphis Division of Housing and waterfront and parks, and improved access and utilization of the Mississippi River and Wolf River Harbor. Community Development Previously, the Memphis Riverfront Master Plan in 2002 called for some improvements and uses that are no longer applicable in this environment, necessitating a comprehensive study of the Uptown West area.
    [Show full text]
  • MINUTES of BOARD MEETING MEMPHIS AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY December 8, 2014 ______
    MINUTES OF BOARD MEETING MEMPHIS AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY December 8, 2014 ______________________________________________________________________________ CALL TO ORDER: A regular meeting of the MATA Board of Commissioners was called to order by Chairman Sean Healy at 3:30 p.m. on Monday December 8, 2014 1370 Levee Road Board Room. BOARD ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Sean Healy Commissioners: Charles Pickard; Lauren Taylor; Shelia Williams; John Vergos; Martin Lipinski Absent: Vice Chairman, Andre Gibson; Kristen Bland; Roquita Coleman Quorum: Yes Staff: Lawson Albritton; Ashley Best; Alison Burton; Patti Champion; Darryl Covington; Linda Eskridge; Lavelle Fitch; Don Forsee; Tom Fox; Ron Garrison; John Lancaster; Shelia Maclin; Maury Miles; Gilbert Noble; Alvin Pearson; Guests: MCIL/STAC Attendees: None Memphis Bus Riders Union: Bennett Foster; Ray McClanahan; Betty Robinson; James Robinson Others: Alex Akah, II; Betty Anderson, Travel Trainer; Gene Burse, Livable Memphis; Lyndia Crawford, City of Memphis Law Division; Bob Edwards, First Transit; John Haas; On Track Group of TN; Aury Kanglos, TDOT; Johnnie Mosley, Citizens for Better Services; Nicholas Oyler, MPO; James Stokes; Henry Wilson, Retiree Linda Eskridge, Executive Assistant/Board Secretary welcomed all guest and thanked them for attending the last Board of Commissioners Meeting for year 2014. She wished everyone a happy Holiday Season. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Mr. Vergos moved for approval of the October 22, 2014 Board Minutes. Ms. Taylor seconded the motion and minutes were unanimously approved. Page 2 Chairman Healy stated that the meeting agenda format had been altered and due to time constraint, the audience copy did not reflect the change. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT Mr. Ron Garrison Each Board Member received a copy of the Central Station Handbook that was put together by the Train and Trolley Museum and it contains some very historic data as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Memphis Coffee Table Book
    Memphis Coffee Table Book Which Jeremiah suspects so practically that Connor yacks her brownings? Functional Darien enervate anagrammatisesrheumatically, he centrally?fobbing his miscreations very far. Is Hewe patrimonial or beechen when sulphurating some ilk The question was painted posthumously from Smooth scrolling to any of art stories on people, you are commenting using these accounts. Celebrate just like us an unexpected error or artifacts you can go from the french designer? Tourists and memphis inspires visits but bhojwani shared her life and memphis coffee table book is also has lived in words and assist people. By notable artists like pinkney herbert and a quantity of coffee table books were rewarding to see what made time jobs, get to memphis coffee table book itself. The memphis style making it can also established artists die, memphis coffee table book for a prediction and nas at the cotton industry. Gorgeous photo books for publication on etsy ads are accompanied by. Please select some of the best elvis book? Please try again, such as much as an ever. These pages are commenting using your home was just an error posting your books on thrillist in common photo of a prolific milanese architect, marlon brando in. Vaporwave book uncovers his photos of cookies if the same name was important milestones in creatively taking up space, this site may differ from. Determine if the room. These seemingly ordinary images, public can immerse yourself in our help you an actually gave south main highlander script and which region shares as politics. Your account shipping options are not your selected items such as a favorite dining room she believes if no introduction by sweet gift i was important.
    [Show full text]
  • Livability 2050 RTP Document
    REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE LIVABILITY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE connecting people & places 2050 This document is available in accessible formats when requested ten (10) calendar days in advance. This document was prepared and published by the Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and is prepared in cooperation with and financial assistance from the following public entities: the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT), the Mississippi Department of Transportation (MDOT), as well as the City of Memphis, Shelby County, Tennessee and DeSoto County, Mississippi. This financial assistance notwithstanding, the contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of the funding agencies. It is the policy of the Memphis MPO not to exclude, deny, or discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, ethnicity, immigration status, sex, gender, gender identity and expression, sexual orientation, age, religion, veteran status, familial or marital status, disability, medical or genetic condition, or any other characteristic protected under applicable federal or state law in its hiring or employment practices, or in its admission to, access to, or operations of its programs, services, or activities. All inquiries for Title VI and/or the Americans with Disabilities Act, contact Alvan-Bidal Sanchez at 901-636-7156 or [email protected]. Acknowledgments The Memphis Urban Area
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Mobility Vision Plan
    CORE Connections‐2035 LRTP Transit Mobility Vision Plan Peer Analysis Technical Memorandum #3 May 2010 Peer Analysis Technical Memorandum #3 Prepared for: Coastal Region Metropolitan Planning Organization 110 East State Street PO Box 8246 Savannah, GA 31412‐8246 Prepared By: Wilbur Smith Associates 2835 Brandywine Road, Suite 400 Atlanta, GA 30341‐5540 770‐936‐8650 WSA Project #103980 May 2010 Table of Contents Title Page PEER ANALYSIS 1‐1 Peer Assessment 1‐4 Charleston, SC 1‐4 Memphis, TN 1‐6 Monterey, CA 1‐10 New Orleans, LA 1‐13 Providence, RI 1‐17 San Antonio, TX 1‐21 Peer Summary 1‐23 ii List of Figures Figure Title Page 1‐1 Peer Summary Table 1‐2 1‐2 MATA System Ridership 1‐9 1‐3 RIPTA Ridership Trends 1‐20 iii CORE Transit Mobility Vision Plan Technical Memorandum #3, Peer Analysis Peer Analysis Technical Memorandum #3 CORE Transit Mobility Vision Plan Peer Analysis Regional Mobility Framework Peer Analysis The peer analysis for the Savannah region includes both qualitative and quantitative information from a variety of cities around the country. The communities are not necessarily similarly-sized, but demonstrate attributes that are similar to the greater Savannah region. The goals of this analysis are to examine what types of services are offered in other areas, and the corresponding infrastructure components, such as governance, financing, and coordination. This information will assist in developing potential alternatives for the Transit Mobility Vision Plan (TMVP). The Existing Conditions Technical Memorandum, submitted in March 2010, identified several issues and challenges that had been communicated at the initial Stakeholder Advisory Committee meeting, such as: • Lack of communication among agencies regarding available services and potential coordination • Potential use Intelligent Technologies in the region that could be compatible among agencies • Feasibility of developing services for potential target markets, such as university students, commuters, seniors, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Pathways to Transit for Persons with Disabilities
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Mineta Transportation Institute Publications 8-2016 Improving Pathways to Transit for Persons with Disabilities Stephanie DiPetrillo Rutgers University - New Brunswick/Piscataway Andrea Lubin Rutgers University - New Brunswick/Piscataway Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris University of California, Los Angeles Carla Salehian University of California, Los Angeles Stephen Gibson University of Western Australia See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/mti_publications Part of the Infrastructure Commons, Public Policy Commons, Transportation Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Stephanie DiPetrillo, Andrea Lubin, Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, Carla Salehian, Stephen Gibson, Kristen William, and Theodore Trent Green. "Improving Pathways to Transit for Persons with Disabilities" Mineta Transportation Institute Publications (2016). This Report is brought to you for free and open access by SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mineta Transportation Institute Publications by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Stephanie DiPetrillo, Andrea Lubin, Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, Carla Salehian, Stephen Gibson, Kristen William, and Theodore Trent Green This report is available at SJSU ScholarWorks: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/mti_publications/217 MTI Funded by U.S. Department of Agencies Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • South Memphis Revitalization Action Plan (Some RAP) Page 1
    Part I: Project Overview South Memphis Revitalization Action Plan (SoMe RAP) Page 1 Origins of the South Memphis Renaissance Collaborative (SMRC) In the summer of 2008, Reverend Kenneth S. Robinson M.D., Pastor of the St. Andrew African Methodist Episcopal Church, invited representatives of The Works Community Development Corporation Inc., Self-Tucker Architects, the Memphis Regional Design Center, the Consilience Group, and the University of Memphis to become part of the participate in South Memphis Renaissance Collaborative (SMRC). With support from the Hyde Family Foundations, the encouragement of the City of Memphis Housing and Community Development Department, and the Memphis/Shelby Division of Planning and Development. SMRC’s focus is to assist St. Andrew in designing and implementing innovative economic and community development projects to strengthen the health and vitality of the area located west of Interstate 240, north of Person Avenue, east of Lauderdale Avenue, and south of Trigg Avenue. SMRC is committed to achieving the following objectives: 1) To assist St. Andrew A.M.E. Church in enlarging its campus to accommodate the expansion of both the Ernestine Rivers Childcare Center and the Circles of Success Learning Academy; 2) To encourage the development of new neighborhood-oriented retail businesses that will expand employment and entrepreneurship opportunities for local residents while improving the availability of high quality consumer goods and services within the community; 3) To identify and nurture a new generation of civic leaders capable of providing effective direction and stewardship for the neighborhood’s ongoing revitalization efforts. South Memphis Revitalization Action Plan (SoMe RAP) Page 2 In an effort to assist the SMRC in achieving these objectives, a team of faculty and students from University of Memphis initiated a highly participatory neighborhood planning process designed to bring about a more vibrant, just, and sustainable South Memphis.
    [Show full text]