Dear Author, Here Are the Proofs of Your Article. • You Can Submit Your Corrections Online, Via E-Mail Or by Fax. • for On

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dear Author, Here Are the Proofs of Your Article. • You Can Submit Your Corrections Online, Via E-Mail Or by Fax. • for On Dear Author, Here are the proofs of your article. • You can submit your corrections online, via e-mail or by fax. • For online submission please insert your corrections in the online correction form. Always indicate the line number to which the correction refers. • You can also insert your corrections in the proof PDF and email the annotated PDF. • For fax submission, please ensure that your corrections are clearly legible. Use a fine black pen and write the correction in the margin, not too close to the edge of the page. • Remember to note the journal title, article number, and your name when sending your response via e-mail or fax. • Check the metadata sheet to make sure that the header information, especially author names and the corresponding affiliations are correctly shown. • Check the questions that may have arisen during copy editing and insert your answers/ corrections. • Check that the text is complete and that all figures, tables and their legends are included. Also check the accuracy of special characters, equations, and electronic supplementary material if applicable. If necessary refer to the Edited manuscript. • The publication of inaccurate data such as dosages and units can have serious consequences. Please take particular care that all such details are correct. • Please do not make changes that involve only matters of style. We have generally introduced forms that follow the journal’s style. Substantial changes in content, e.g., new results, corrected values, title and authorship are not allowed without the approval of the responsible editor. In such a case, please contact the Editorial Office and return his/her consent together with the proof. • If we do not receive your corrections within 48 hours, we will send you a reminder. • Your article will be published Online First approximately one week after receipt of your corrected proofs. This is the official first publication citable with the DOI. Further changes are, therefore, not possible. • The printed version will follow in a forthcoming issue. Please note After online publication, subscribers (personal/institutional) to this journal will have access to the complete article via the DOI using the URL: http://dx.doi.org/[DOI]. If you would like to know when your article has been published online, take advantage of our free alert service. For registration and further information go to: http://www.link.springer.com. Due to the electronic nature of the procedure, the manuscript and the original figures will only be returned to you on special request. When you return your corrections, please inform us if you would like to have these documents returned. Metadata of the article that will be visualized in OnlineFirst ArticleTitle Combined Gravimetric–Seismic Crustal Model for Antarctica Article Sub-Title Article CopyRight Springer Science+Business Media B.V. (This will be the copyright line in the final PDF) Journal Name Surveys in Geophysics Corresponding Author Family Name Tenzer Particle Given Name Robert Suffix Division Department of Land Surveying and Geo-Informatics Organization Hong Kong Polytechnic University Address Kowloon, Hong Kong Phone Fax Email [email protected] URL ORCID Author Family Name Baranov Particle Given Name Alexey Suffix Division Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth Organization Russian Academy of Sciences Address Moscow, Russian Federation Division Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics Organization Russian Academy of Sciences Address Moscow, Russian Federation Phone Fax Email URL ORCID Author Family Name Bagherbandi Particle Given Name Mohammad Suffix Division Division of Geodesy and Geoinformatics Organization Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Address Stockholm, Sweden Division Department of Industrial Development, IT and Land Management Organization University of Gävle Address Gävle, Sweden Phone Fax Email URL ORCID Received 11 May 2017 Schedule Revised Accepted 8 August 2017 Abstract The latest seismic data and improved information about the subglacial bedrock relief are used in this study to estimate the sediment and crustal thickness under the Antarctic continent. Since large parts of Antarctica are not yet covered by seismic surveys, the gravity and crustal structure models are used to interpolate the Moho information where seismic data are missing. The gravity information is also extended offshore to detect the Moho under continental margins and neighboring oceanic crust. The processing strategy involves the solution to the Vening Meinesz-Moritz’s inverse problem of isostasy constrained on seismic data. A comparison of our new results with existing studies indicates a substantial improvement in the sediment and crustal models. The seismic data analysis shows significant sediment accumulations in Antarctica, with broad sedimentary basins. According to our result, the maximum sediment thickness in Antarctica is about 15 km under Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf. The Moho relief closely resembles major geological and tectonic features. A rather thick continental crust of East Antarctic Craton is separated from a complex geological/tectonic structure of West Antarctica by the Transantarctic Mountains. The average Moho depth of 34.1 km under the Antarctic continent slightly differs from previous estimates. A maximum Moho deepening of 58.2 km under the Gamburtsev Subglacial Mountains in East Antarctica confirmed the presence of deep and compact orogenic roots. Another large Moho depth in East Antarctica is detected under Dronning Maud Land with two orogenic roots under Wohlthat Massif (48–50 km) and the Kottas Mountains (48–50 km) that are separated by a relatively thin crust along Jutulstraumen Rift. The Moho depth under central parts of the Transantarctic Mountains reaches 46 km. The maximum Moho deepening (34–38 km) in West Antarctica is under the Antarctic Peninsula. The Moho depth minima in East Antarctica are found under the Lambert Trench (24–28 km), while in West Antarctica the Moho depth minima are along the West Antarctic Rift System under the Bentley depression (20–22 km) and Ross Sea Ice Shelf (16–24 km). The gravimetric result confirmed a maximum extension of the Antarctic continental margins under the Ross Sea Embayment and the Weddell Sea Embayment with an extremely thin continental crust (10–20 km). Keywords (separated by '-') Antarctica - Crust - Gravity - Ice - Isostasy - Moho - Sediments - Seismic data Footnote Information Journal : Small 10712 Dispatch : 11-8-2017 Pages : 34 Article No. : 9423 h LE h TYPESET MS Code : GEOP-D-17-00046 h44CP h DISK Surv Geophys DOI 10.1007/s10712-017-9423-5 12 3 Combined Gravimetric–Seismic Crustal Model 4 for Antarctica 5 Alexey Baranov1,2 • Robert Tenzer3 • Mohammad Bagherbandi4,5 Author Proof 6 Received: 11 May 2017 / Accepted: 8 August 2017 7 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017 8 Abstract The latest seismic data and improved information about the subglacial bedrock 9AQ1 relief are used in this study to estimate the sediment and crustalPROOF thickness under the 10 Antarctic continent. Since large parts of Antarctica are not yet covered by seismic surveys, 11 the gravity and crustal structure models are used to interpolate the Moho information 12 where seismic data are missing. The gravity information is also extended offshore to detect 13 the Moho under continental margins and neighboring oceanic crust. The processing 14 strategy involves the solution to the Vening Meinesz-Moritz’s inverse problem of isostasy 15AQ2 constrained on seismic data. A comparison of our new results with existing studies indi- 16 cates a substantial improvement in the sediment and crustal models. The seismic data 17 analysis shows significant sediment accumulations in Antarctica, with broad sedimentary 18 basins. According to our result, the maximum sediment thickness in Antarctica is about 19 15 km under Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf. The Moho relief closely resembles major geo- 20 logical and tectonic features. A rather thick continental crust of East Antarctic Craton is 21AQ3 separated from a complex geological/tectonicECTED structure of West Antarctica by the 22 Transantarctic Mountains. The average Moho depth of 34.1 km under the Antarctic con- 23 tinent slightly differs from previous estimates. A maximum Moho deepening of 58.2 km 24 under the Gamburtsev Subglacial Mountains in East Antarctica confirmed the presence of A1 & Robert Tenzer A2 [email protected] A3 1 Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian A4 Federation A5 2 Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics, Russian Academy of A6 Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation A7 3 Department of Land Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, A8 Kowloon, Hong Kong A9 4 Division ofUNCORR Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, A10 Sweden A11 5 Department of Industrial Development, IT and Land Management, University of Ga¨vle, Ga¨vle, Sweden 123 Journal : Small 10712 Dispatch : 11-8-2017 Pages : 34 Article No. : 9423 h LE h TYPESET MS Code : GEOP-D-17-00046 h44CP h DISK Surv Geophys 25 deep and compact orogenic roots. Another large Moho depth in East Antarctica is detected 26 under Dronning Maud Land with two orogenic roots under Wohlthat Massif (48–50 km) 27 and the Kottas Mountains (48–50 km) that are separated by a relatively thin crust along 28 Jutulstraumen Rift. The Moho depth under central parts of the Transantarctic Mountains 29 reaches 46 km. The maximum Moho deepening
Recommended publications
  • Air and Shipborne Magnetic Surveys of the Antarctic Into the 21St Century
    TECTO-125389; No of Pages 10 Tectonophysics xxx (2012) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Tectonophysics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tecto Air and shipborne magnetic surveys of the Antarctic into the 21st century A. Golynsky a,⁎,R.Bellb,1, D. Blankenship c,2,D.Damasked,3,F.Ferracciolie,4,C.Finnf,5,D.Golynskya,6, S. Ivanov g,7,W.Jokath,8,V.Masolovg,6,S.Riedelh,7,R.vonFresei,9,D.Youngc,2 and ADMAP Working Group a VNIIOkeangeologia, 1, Angliysky Avenue, St.-Petersburg, 190121, Russia b LDEO of Columbia University, 61, Route 9W, PO Box 1000, Palisades, NY 10964-8000, USA c University of Texas, Institute for Geophysics, 4412 Spicewood Springs Rd., Bldg. 600, Austin, Texas 78759-4445, USA d BGR, Stilleweg 2 D-30655, Hannover, Germany e BAS, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 OET, UK f USGS, Denver Federal Center, Box 25046 Denver, CO 80255, USA g PMGE, 24, Pobeda St., Lomonosov, 189510, Russia h AWI, Columbusstrasse, 27568, Bremerhaven, Germany i School of Earth Sciences, The Ohio State University, 125 S. Oval Mall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA article info abstract Article history: The Antarctic geomagnetics' community remains very active in crustal anomaly mapping. More than 1.5 million Received 1 August 2011 line-km of new air- and shipborne data have been acquired over the past decade by the international community Received in revised form 27 January 2012 in Antarctica. These new data together with surveys that previously were not in the public domain significantly Accepted 13 February 2012 upgrade the ADMAP compilation.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Polar Programs
    DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SURFACE TRAVERSE CAPABILITIES IN ANTARCTICA COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION DRAFT (15 January 2004) FINAL (30 August 2004) National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, Virginia 22230 DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SURFACE TRAVERSE CAPABILITIES IN ANTARCTICA FINAL COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose.......................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation (CEE) Process .......................................................1-1 1.3 Document Organization .............................................................................................................1-2 2.0 BACKGROUND OF SURFACE TRAVERSES IN ANTARCTICA..................................2-1 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Re-supply Traverses...................................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Scientific Traverses and Surface-Based Surveys .......................................................................2-5 3.0 ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................................................................3-1
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Primer
    Antarctic Primer By Nigel Sitwell, Tom Ritchie & Gary Miller By Nigel Sitwell, Tom Ritchie & Gary Miller Designed by: Olivia Young, Aurora Expeditions October 2018 Cover image © I.Tortosa Morgan Suite 12, Level 2 35 Buckingham Street Surry Hills, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia To anyone who goes to the Antarctic, there is a tremendous appeal, an unparalleled combination of grandeur, beauty, vastness, loneliness, and malevolence —all of which sound terribly melodramatic — but which truly convey the actual feeling of Antarctica. Where else in the world are all of these descriptions really true? —Captain T.L.M. Sunter, ‘The Antarctic Century Newsletter ANTARCTIC PRIMER 2018 | 3 CONTENTS I. CONSERVING ANTARCTICA Guidance for Visitors to the Antarctic Antarctica’s Historic Heritage South Georgia Biosecurity II. THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Antarctica The Southern Ocean The Continent Climate Atmospheric Phenomena The Ozone Hole Climate Change Sea Ice The Antarctic Ice Cap Icebergs A Short Glossary of Ice Terms III. THE BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT Life in Antarctica Adapting to the Cold The Kingdom of Krill IV. THE WILDLIFE Antarctic Squids Antarctic Fishes Antarctic Birds Antarctic Seals Antarctic Whales 4 AURORA EXPEDITIONS | Pioneering expedition travel to the heart of nature. CONTENTS V. EXPLORERS AND SCIENTISTS The Exploration of Antarctica The Antarctic Treaty VI. PLACES YOU MAY VISIT South Shetland Islands Antarctic Peninsula Weddell Sea South Orkney Islands South Georgia The Falkland Islands South Sandwich Islands The Historic Ross Sea Sector Commonwealth Bay VII. FURTHER READING VIII. WILDLIFE CHECKLISTS ANTARCTIC PRIMER 2018 | 5 Adélie penguins in the Antarctic Peninsula I. CONSERVING ANTARCTICA Antarctica is the largest wilderness area on earth, a place that must be preserved in its present, virtually pristine state.
    [Show full text]
  • Subglacial Lake Ellsworth CEE V2.Indd
    Proposed Exploration of Subglacial Lake Ellsworth Antarctica Draft Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation February 2011 1 The cover art was created by first, second, and third grade students at The Village School, a Montessori school located in Waldwick, New Jersey. Art instructor, Bob Fontaine asked his students to create an interpretation of the work being done on The Lake Ellsworth Project and to create over 200 of their own imaginary microbes. This art project was part of The Village School’s art curriculum that links art with ongoing cultural work. 2 Contents Non Technical Summary .................................................4 Personnel ............................................................................................ 26 Chapter 1: Introduction ...................................................6 Power generation and fuel calculations ....................................... 27 Chapter 2: Description of proposed activity..................7 Vehicles ................................................................................................ 28 Background and justification ..............................................................7 Water and waste ...............................................................................28 The site ...................................................................................................8 Communications ............................................................................... 28 Chapter 3: Baseline conditions of Lake Ellsworth .........9 Transport of equipment
    [Show full text]
  • Late Quaternary Volcanic Activity in Marie Byrd Land: Potential 40Ar/39Ar-Dated Time Horizons in West Antarctic Ice and Marine Cores
    Late Quaternary volcanic activity in Marie Byrd Land: Potential 40Ar/39Ar-dated time horizons in West Antarctic ice and marine cores T. I. Wilch* Department of Geological Sciences, Albion College, Albion, Michigan 49224 W. C. McIntosh Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, and New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Socorro, New Mexico 87801 N. W. Dunbar New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Socorro, New Mexico 87801 ABSTRACT More than 12 40Ar/39Ar-dated tephra lay- ies is to determine the basal age of the ice sheet. ers, exposed in bare ice on the summit ice cap The 1968 Byrd Station ice core in the West Late Quaternary volcanic activity at three of Mount Moulton, 30 km from their inferred Antarctic Ice Sheet has an inferred basal age of major alkaline composite volcanoes in Marie source at Mount Berlin, range in age from 492 only 74 ka (Hammer et al., 1994). The exten- Byrd Land, West Antarctica, is dominated by to 15 ka. These englacial tephra layers provide sive lateral flow of ice from the ice divide area explosive eruptions, many capable of deposit- a minimum age of 492 ka for the oldest iso- to Byrd Station may have removed or disturbed ing ash layers as regional time-stratigraphic topically dated ice in West Antarctica. This much of the basal ice record. Consequently, the horizons in the West Antarctic Ice Sheet and well-dated section of locally derived glacial ice 74 ka date of the Byrd core provides only a in Southern Ocean marine sediments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paleoposition of Marie Byrd Land, West Antarctica
    Objectives of the present study are to date the three rock The initial strontium-87/strontium-86 ratio was calcu- units using the Rb-Sr (rubidium-strontium) whole-rock lated as 0.71222 ± .00015. It has been demonstrated by isochron method described by Faure (1977) and to date Faure (1977) that the initial 87Sr/86Sr ratio of mantle-derived mineral separates (biotite, hornblende) using Rb-Sr and rocks would lie between 0.702 and 0.706. Since the calcu- argon-40/argon-39 techniques. This will facilitate an inter- lated initial ratio is well above this range, it suggests that pretation of the cooling history of the area based on the the Carlyon Granodiorite is either a product of re- retention temperature of each mineral for the respective mobilization of crustal material, or has been contaminated isotopes. The analytical data will be used along with field with radiogenic strontium derived from the crust. and petrographic observations to interpret the age, origin, The Carlyon is a medium- to coarse-grained, biotite- and thermal history of these rock suites and to relate this to hornblende-andesine granodiorite. It is commonly porphy- the tectonic evolution of the Transantarctic Mountains. ritic, with a strongly developed foliation, sometimes almost Over the past year we have prepared the rock samples gneissic. These textural and mineralogical criteria suggest for the laboratory analyses, determined rubidium and similarities with the Olympus Granite Gneiss of Wright strontium concentrations of whole-rock samples by X-ray Valley (77°33S 16130E) (Faure, Jones, and Owen 1974) fluorescence, and determined the isotopic composition of and the Lonely Ridge Granodiorite of the Nilsen Plateau strontium using a solid-source mass spectrometer.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inventory of Subglacial Volcanoes in West Antarctica
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 24, 2021 A new volcanic province: an inventory of subglacial volcanoes in West Antarctica MAXIMILLIAN VAN WYK DE VRIES*, ROBERT G. BINGHAM & ANDREW S. HEIN School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, UK *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The West Antarctic Ice Sheet overlies the West Antarctic Rift System about which, due to the comprehensive ice cover, we have only limited and sporadic knowledge of volcanic activity and its extent. Improving our understanding of subglacial volcanic activity across the province is important both for helping to constrain how volcanism and rifting may have influenced ice-sheet growth and decay over previous glacial cycles, and in light of concerns over whether enhanced geo- thermal heat fluxes and subglacial melting may contribute to instability of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. Here, we use ice-sheet bed-elevation data to locate individual conical edifices protruding upwards into the ice across West Antarctica, and we propose that these edifices represent subglacial volcanoes. We used aeromagnetic, aerogravity, satellite imagery and databases of confirmed volca- noes to support this interpretation. The overall result presented here constitutes a first inventory of West Antarctica’s subglacial volcanism. We identified 138 volcanoes, 91 of which have not previ- ously been identified, and which are widely distributed throughout the deep basins of West Antarc- tica, but are especially concentrated and orientated along the >3000 km central axis of the West Antarctic Rift System. Gold Open Access: This article is published under the terms of the CC-BY 3.0 license.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Inspections Under Article 7 of the Antarctic Treaty and Article 14 of Its Protocol on Environmental Protection, 1959- 2001
    º XXVI ATCM Information Paper IP-118-ASOC/UNEP/Rev.1 Agenda Item: ATCM 11 ASOC/UNEP Original: English A REVIEW OF INSPECTIONS UNDER ARTICLE 7 OF THE ANTARCTIC TREATY AND ARTICLE 14 OF ITS PROTOCOL ON ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 1959-2001 Madrid, 9/20 de junio 2003 1 XXVI ATCM Information Paper 118/Rev.1 June 2003 Original: English Agenda Item 11 A REVIEW OF INSPECTIONS UNDER ARTICLE 7 OF THE ANTARCTIC TREATY AND ARTICLE 14 OF ITS PROTOCOL ON ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 1959- 2001 Submitted to the XXVI ATCM by the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition and the United Nations Environment Programme 2 A REVIEW OF INSPECTIONS UNDER ARTICLE 7 OF THE ANTARCTIC TREATY AND ARTICLE 14 OF ITS PROTOCOL ON ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 1959- 2001 I. INTRODUCTION Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty and Article 14 of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty enable Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties to conduct inspections in order to promote the objectives and ensure compliance with the provisions of the Antarctic Treaty and its Protocol. Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty establishes the right of free access for observation and inspection by the Contracting Parties. Observers designed under Article VII (1) “shall have complete freedom of access”, including the conducting of aerial observations, “at any time to any or all areas of Antarctica.” The facilities that may be inspected include “all stations, installations and equipment within those areas, and all ships and aircraft at points of discharging or embarking cargoes or personnel in Antarctica.” Article 14 of the Protocol establishes that Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties “shall arrange, individually or collectively, for inspections by observers to be made in accordance with Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty.” During inspections, observers should be given access to “all parts of stations, installations, equipment, ships and aircraft open to inspection under Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty, and to all records” that are maintained at those facilities in accordance to Protocol requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Marie Byrd Land Coastal Sector of West Antarctica
    mid-December, a replacement helicopter arrived, mountains. Attempts also were made to isolate air- and the investigations proceeded on the scale origi- borne plant propagules at the base camp. nally planned, except for delays caused by the Paleomagnetic investigations were undertaken by weather, with geophysical studies being conducted in Washington University (St. Louis) to determine the the third aircraft. From November 1, 1966, until magnetic-pole positions indicated by rocks of Juras- January 25, 1967, when the base camp was evacu- sic age. Comparisons of these positions with those ated, flights could be made on only 27 days. On those exhibited by rocks of the same age collected in other days, operations were carried out around the clock antarctic regions will aid in elucidating the tectonic if weather permitted. history of the Continent. The topographic program was carried out by the Scientific Programs U.S. Geological Survey to establish control for aerial Geological studies were conducted by Texas photographic mapping of this part of Marie Byrd Technological College and the University of Minne- Land and to determine the locations of some gravity sota in all mountains of the area except the stations in cooperation with the geophysical pro- northernmost part of the Ford Ranges. A major ob- gram. (Because the topographic program involved jective of this work was to determine if the Fosdick work in other parts of Antarctica, discussion of the Mountains are made up of very old rocks, perhaps work done in Marie Byrd Land is included in the of the basement complex, or if they are part of the general report, which is presented on page 118.) plutonic masses which are distributed with some The geophysical investigations consisted of mak- regularity throughout the Ford Ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Ainley.Pdf
    55 MARINE ORNITHOLOGY Vol. 30 No. 2 2002 FORUM THE ROSS SEA, ANTARCTICA, WHERE ALL ECOSYSTEM PROCESSES STILL REMAIN FOR STUDY, BUT MAYBE NOT FOR LONG D.G. AINLEY H.T. Harvey & Associates, 3150 Almaden Expressway, Suite 145, San Jose, California 95118, USA ([email protected]) Received 29 October 2002, accepted 31 December 2002 SUMMARY AINLEY, D.G. 2002. The Ross Sea: where all ecosystem processes still remain for study, but maybe not for long. Marine Ornithology 30: 55–62. The Ross Sea is a well-defined embayment of Antarctica about the size of southern Europe, bounded by Victoria Land to the west, King Edward VII Peninsula, Marie Byrd Land to the east, the Ross Ice Shelf to the south, and the Pacific Sector of the Southern Ocean to the north. Its waters are composed of two related biotic systems: the Ross Sea Shelf Ecosystem (RSShelfE) and the Ross Sea Slope Ecosystem (RSSlopeE). The Ross Sea is off limits to mineral extraction, but pressures on its biological resources are growing. The economic value of the resources should be weighed against the value of the system as a unique scientific resource. The Ross Sea represents an unparal- leled natural laboratory in which the results of different fishery management strategies could be modeled in the context of short-term and decadal variation in biological populations, with these models applied throughout the Southern Ocean and elsewhere. The RSShelfE is the last Large Marine Ecosystem on Earth (except the Weddell Sea and, perhaps, Hudson Bay in the north of Canada) that has escaped direct anthropogenic alteration; the RSSlopeE, similar to all of Earth’s other marine ecosystems, has lost its large baleen whales but otherwise is intact.
    [Show full text]
  • Heterogeneous Sources for Pleistocene Lavas of Marie Byrd Land, Antarctica: New Data from the SW Pacific Diffuse Alkaline Magmatic Province
    U.S. Geological Survey and The National Academies; USGS OFR-2007-xxxx, Extended Abstract.yyy, 1-4 Heterogeneous sources for Pleistocene lavas of Marie Byrd Land, Antarctica: new data from the SW Pacific diffuse alkaline magmatic province 1 2 Amy M. Gaffney and Christine S. Siddoway 1Chemistry, Materials and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Avenue L-231, Livermore, CA 94550, USA ([email protected]) 2 Department of Geology, Colorado College, 14 E. Cache la Poudre. Colorado Springs, CO 80903, USA ([email protected]) Summary Here we report new major and trace element and Sr-Nd-Pb isotope data for Pleistocene basaltic lavas from the Fosdick Mountains, Ford Ranges in west Marie Byrd Land. The studied lavas erupted from three volcanic centers: Mt. Avers (basanites), Mt. Perkins (basalts) and Recess Nunatak (basanites). The lavas are geochemically homogeneous within each volcanic center, but vary in composition among the centers. Although the studied lavas have incompatible element enrichment patterns that are similar to other lavas from central and east Marie Byrd Land volcanoes, they have isotopic compositions that are not represented by other Marie Byrd Land volcanoes. This indicates that the mantle source regions feeding Marie Byrd Land volcanism are more heterogeneous than previously indicated. The geochemistry of these magmas provide a means to evaluate competing hypotheses for the origin of these magmas: plume-related, rift-related, or related to sinking of subducted slabs. Citation: Gaffney, A. M., and C. S. Siddoway (2007), Heterogeneous sources for Pleistocene lavas of Marie Byrd Land, Antarctica: new data from the SW Pacific diffuse alkaline magmatic province, in Antarctica: A Keystone for a Changing World – Online Proceedings of the 10th ISAES, edited by A.
    [Show full text]
  • Little America
    LITTLE AMERICA AERIAL EXPLORATION IN THE ANTARCTIC THE FLIGHT TO THE SOUTH POLE '..!• RIC HARD EVELYK BYRIJ. Rear Admiral, U. S. N., R et. LITTLE AMERICA AERIAL EXPLORATION IN THE ANTARCTIC THE FUGHT TO THE SOUTH POLE By RICHARD EVELYN BYRD Rear Admiral, U.S.N., Ret. WITH 74 ILLUSTRATIONS AND MAPS G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS NEW YORK LONDON 1930 . UTTLE.., AMElliCA Copyright, 1930 . by Richard E. Byrd First Impression. Nowmber. 1930 Second Impression, November, 1930 Third Impression, December, 1930 Fourth Impression, December, 1930 AU rights reserved. This book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission. BET AND PRINTED 81' THE KNICKERBOCKER PRESS MADE IN THE U. 8. A. TO MY MOTHER ELEANOR BOLLING BYRD FOREWORD THE efficiency of a polar expedition varies on the whole according to the adequacy of its prreparations, the worth of its equipment and scientific gear, the services of its personnel and· staff of scientists and the length of its stay in the field. These things require a great deal of money nowadays, and no explorer could possibly foot the bill on the strength of his own pocketbook. He is dependent upon the generosity of friends and the public. This has been true in my case especially, for the problem of financing two of my last three expeditions has fallen first upon me and then upon friends. This last expedition to the Antarctic was, for reasons explained in subsequent pages, a costly one. Prepara­ tions for it were extensive, its equipment and scientific gear was new, modern and, in many cases, especially designed for the problem; its scientific staff was more than competent and the expedition itself wa~ away from the United States for nearly two years.
    [Show full text]