Mindfulness and Its Role in Psychological Well-Being
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Copyright 2003 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 2003, Vol. 84, No. 4, 822–848 0022-3514/03/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822 The Benefits of Being Present: Mindfulness and Its Role in Psychological Well-Being Kirk Warren Brown and Richard M. Ryan University of Rochester Mindfulness is an attribute of consciousness long believed to promote well-being. This research provides a theoretical and empirical examination of the role of mindfulness in psychological well-being. The development and psychometric properties of the dispositional Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) are described. Correlational, quasi-experimental, and laboratory studies then show that the MAAS measures a unique quality of consciousness that is related to a variety of well-being constructs, that differentiates mindfulness practitioners from others, and that is associated with enhanced self- awareness. An experience-sampling study shows that both dispositional and state mindfulness predict self-regulated behavior and positive emotional states. Finally, a clinical intervention study with cancer patients demonstrates that increases in mindfulness over time relate to declines in mood disturbance and stress. Many philosophical, spiritual, and psychological traditions em- Kabat-Zinn, 1990). To date, however, there has been little work phasize the importance of the quality of consciousness for the examining this attribute as a naturally occurring characteristic. maintenance and enhancement of well-being (Wilber, 2000). De- Recognizing that most everyone has the capacity to attend and to spite this, it is easy to overlook the importance of consciousness in be aware, we nonetheless assume (a) that individuals differ in their human well-being because almost everyone exercises its primary propensity or willingness to be aware and to sustain attention to capacities, that is, attention and awareness. Indeed, the relation what is occurring in the present and (b) that this mindful capacity between qualities of consciousness and well-being has received varies within persons, because it can be sharpened or dulled by a little empirical attention. One attribute of consciousness that has variety of factors. The intent of the present research is to reliably been much-discussed in relation to well-being is mindfulness. The identify these inter- and intrapersonal variations in mindfulness, concept of mindfulness has roots in Buddhist and other contem- establish their relations to other relevant psychological constructs, plative traditions where conscious attention and awareness are and demonstrate their importance to a variety of forms of psycho- actively cultivated. It is most commonly defined as the state of logical well-being. being attentive to and aware of what is taking place in the present. For example, Nyanaponika Thera (1972) called mindfulness “the THE NATURE OF MINDFULNESS clear and single-minded awareness of what actually happens to us and in us at the successive moments of perception” (p. 5). Hanh AND MINDLESSNESS (1976) similarly defined mindfulness as “keeping one’s conscious- Several authors (e.g., Averill, 1992; Mayer, Chabot, & Carl- ness alive to the present reality” (p. 11). smith, 1997) have distinguished consciousness from other modes Recent research has shown that the enhancement of mindfulness of mental processing—namely, cognition, motives, and emo- through training facilitates a variety of well-being outcomes (e.g., tions—that allow humans to operate effectively. Thus, one can be conscious of thoughts, motives, and emotions as well as sensory and perceptual stimuli. Consciousness encompasses both aware- Kirk Warren Brown and Richard M. Ryan, Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, University of Rochester. ness and attention. Awareness is the background “radar” of con- This research was supported in part by a postdoctoral fellowship from sciousness, continually monitoring the inner and outer environ- the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, by grants ment. One may be aware of stimuli without them being at the from the Russell Sage Foundation and the Society of the Psychological center of attention. Attention is a process of focusing conscious Study of Social Issues to Kirk Warren Brown, and by National Institute of awareness, providing heightened sensitivity to a limited range of Mental Health Grant 59594 to Richard M. Ryan. We are grateful to Linda experience (Westen, 1999). In actuality, awareness and attention Carlson, Ed Deci, Jennifer LaGuardia, Martin Lynch, and Todd Thrash for are intertwined, such that attention continually pulls “figures” out their helpful comments on previous versions of this article. We also thank of the “ground” of awareness, holding them focally for varying D.S. Moskowitz, Joseph Schwartz, Joshua Smyth, and Harry Reis for lengths of time. statistical programming help; Chris Stevens and Bodhin Kjolhede for Although attention and awareness are relatively constant fea- participant recruitment assistance; and Linda Carlson for collecting the data presented in Study 5. tures of normal functioning, mindfulness can be considered an Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Kirk enhanced attention to and awareness of current experience or Warren Brown, Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, present reality. Specifically, a core characteristic of mindfulness University of Rochester, Meliora Hall, Rochester, New York 14627-0266. has been described as open or receptive awareness and attention E-mail: [email protected] (Deikman, 1982; Martin, 1997), which may be reflected in a more 822 MINDFULNESS AND WELL-BEING 823 regular or sustained consciousness of ongoing events and experi- 1975). However, this form of awareness is defined by its focus ences. For example, in speaking with a friend, one can be highly rather than by its quality. Thus, high private self-consciousness attentive to the communication and sensitively aware of the per- may reflect preoccupation with internal states or an open recep- haps subtle emotional tone underlying it. Similarly, when eating a tivity to them. Recent research has, in fact, uncovered two factors meal, one can be attuned to the moment-to-moment taste experi- in this construct, internal state awareness and self-reflectiveness ence while also peripherally aware of the increasing feeling of (Cramer, 2000; Trapnell & Campbell, 1999). The former repre- fullness in one’s stomach. This is to be contrasted with conscious- sents sensitivity to ongoing psychological processes, a construct ness that is blunted or restricted in various ways. For example, that has greater conceptual overlap with mindfulness. Even more rumination, absorption in the past, or fantasies and anxieties about distinct from mindfulness is public self-consciousness, the ten- the future can pull one away from what is taking place in the dency to be concerned about the self as perceived by others, which present. Awareness or attention can also be divided, such as when may detract from present awareness. Several other approaches to people are occupied with multiple tasks or preoccupied with con- the measurement of self-awareness have also been developed, cerns that detract from the quality of engagement with what is including self-monitoring (Snyder, 1974) and reflection (Trapnell focally present. Mindfulness is also compromised when individu- & Campbell, 1999). als behave compulsively or automatically, without awareness of or Although distinct in the content that each examines, all the attention to one’s behavior (Deci & Ryan, 1980). Finally, mind- forms of self-awareness discussed above reflect cognitive opera- lessness, which we denote as the relative absence of mindfulness, tions on aspects of the self through self-examination, processes can be defensively motivated, as when an individual refuses to collectively termed reflexive consciousness (Baumeister, 1999; acknowledge or attend to a thought, emotion, motive, or object of Bermu´dez, 1998). Mindfulness directed inward differs from these perception. These forms of consciousness thus serve as concrete approaches in that its mode of functioning is perceptual or “pre- counterpoints to mindful presence and the attention to current reflexive,” operating on, rather than within, thought, feeling, and experience within and without oneself that such presence entails. other contents of consciousness. Rather than generating mental As presently defined, mindfulness bears some relation to other accounts about the self, mindfulness “offer[s] a bare display of constructs that have received empirical attention. For example, what is taking place” (Shear & Jevning, 1999, p. 204). Thus, emotional intelligence, as described by Salovey, Mayer, Goldman, whereas the modes of reflexive consciousness noted above con- Turvey, and Palfai (1995), includes perceptual clarity about one’s cern the focus of cognitive operations, mindfulness concerns the emotional states. Insofar as mindfulness involves receptive atten- quality of consciousness itself and, except for the inverse relation tion to psychological states, we expect it to be associated with such to public self-consciousness noted above, is theorized to have little clarity. In less mindful states, emotions may occur outside of or no inherent relation to reflexive thought. awareness or drive behavior before one clearly acknowledges them. Mindfulness also appears to relate to aspects of the Open- MINDFULNESS