DOCSLIB.ORG

The Soils of Elgin County Volume 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Soils of Elgin County Volume 1 The Soils of Elgin County Volume 1 Ministry of Agriculture Agriculture and Food Canada Research Direction Branch de la recherche THE SOILS OF ELGIN COUNTY Volume 1 REPORT NO. 63 OF THE ONTARIO CENTRE FOR SOIL RESOURCE EVALUATION by L. W. Schut Resources Management Branch Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food Guelph, Ontario 1992 The Ontario Centre forSoil Resource Evaluation serves as a coordinating body between three member agencies working in the areas of soil inventory, interpretation, and research. It is made up of components of the Land Resource Division, Centre for hand and Biological Resources Research of Agriculture Canada, Resources Management Branch of the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food and the Department of Land Resource Science of the University of Guelph. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The completion of this report and the soil Assistance in preparing the water erosion maps for Elgin County required the assistance of section of the report was provided by 1. Shelton many people. Grateful appreciation is extended to and Dr. G. Wall, Agriculture Canada, Guelph. all of the following individuals who contributed in Assistance in developing the horticultural crop so many ways. interpretations was provided by K. Priest, Ontario Assistance with legend preparation, field Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Woodstock, and mapping and map preparation was provided by J. Gardner, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and D. Aspinall, E. Wilson, and B. Stevens, Ontario Food, London. The interpretations for special field Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Guelph. Soil crops, and the C values for the water erosion correlation assistance was provided by E. Presant, interpretations, were developed with the assistance Agriculture Canada, Guelph, and T. Hagerty, of H. Martin, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Guelph. Food, St. Thomas. Field assistance with sampling for soil Cartographic assistance in preparing the maps, characterization and interpretation was provided and also the figures in the report, was provided by by B. Hohner, K. Denholm, S. Duvieusart and D. Irvine and D. Wilson, Department of Land D. Lymbumer, Agriculture Canada, Guelph, and Resource Science, University of Guelph, and by D. Aspinall, T. Hagerty, E. Wilson, and D. Rouleau, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and J. Alberts, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Guelph. Map digitization was done by Food, Guelph. 1. Gillespie and G. Cameron, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Guelph. Preparation of the Assistance with data management was maps for printing was done by staff of Agriculture provided by C. Fitzgibbon and C. Palmer, Canada, Ottawa, under the supervision of Department of Land Resource Science, University B. Edwards and R. St. John. of Guelph, and by J. Alberts, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Guelph. Special assistance Climatic information contained in the report with the map computer files was provided by was provided by Dr. D. Brown, Department of B. Grant, Agriculture Canada, Guelph. Land Resource Science, University of Guelph. General editorial comments were provided by M. Laboratory analyses were done by B. Hohner Kingston and B. van den Broek, Ontario Ministry and C. Miller, Agriculture Canada, Guelph, and of Agriculture and Food, Guelph. Word L. Stahlbaum, Department of Land Resource processing assistance to prepare the manuscript Science, University of Guelph. Water retention was provided by J. Alberts, M. van Dongen, and analyses were done by K. Wires, Agriculture J. Fagan, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Canada, Ottawa. Engineering analyses were done Food, Guelph. by staff of the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario, London, under the supervision of R. Murphy. TABLE OF CONTENTS . .., `ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .. '`. .. .. 1 . ~. _, .LIST OF TABLES . '''. .. .. , ; .. 4 ..:1: LIST OF FIGURES . .. .. 5 INTRODUCTION .`. .6 HOW TO USE THE SOIL REPORT AND MAPS . 6 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA. General Information . 8 Climate . .'. .. 8 HOW THE SOILS WERE MAPPED AND CLASSIFIED Soil Mapping . .' . : . .17 Survey Intensity and Map Reliability . .. , 11. .. 17 Soil Classification . ." .` . .18 GENERAL DESCRIPTIONS OF THE SOILS' . .... " Key . .'. : . : `: : -. , . ' . 21 Soil . .. >,_ . _. .. Soil Descriptions . .'. , . 24 Ayr Soils (AY) . .. ..~. ... .. 26 Bennington Soils (BN) . ''. .. " . - . .- . 26 , . ', . : 3 .., " . Berrien Soils (BE) . ' . 27 . Beverly Soils (BV) . ." . -_. -°. 27 . .. Bookton Soils (BO);. .. .. r , . 28 Brady Soils (BY) . .29 . .. , , . Brant Soils (BT) . .. ."-`_. .. .. 29 Brantford Soils (BF) '', ; . 30 . , . i s Brisbane Soils (BI) . .. : : . : ;' . 31 . .. .. Burford Soils (BU) '.'. 31 Caledon Soils (CA) . ° . Y . .~_ . 32 °'-``'Camillâ Soils' (CM)` ..-'''. .° . .. 33 Churchville Soils (CH) . ..33 . ~ . ~° ;: . Colwood Soils (CW) .. .'`. .. '~~. 34 Ekfrid Soils (EK) . .. .. .. .. _. .- . Fox Soils (FX) . ". ..'-. " . 35 . 36 `'k Gobles Soils (GO) - . .' . 36 Granby Soils (GY) . .37 _ ,37 Highgate Soils (HI) . .. Kelvin Soils (KE) . .' . .` . .-". ." .' . .``. .' . ' . .°~. .. .-38 Kintyre Soils (K'I) . .. , ~, 39 Maplewood Soils (MA) . .`'. .` . .' . .'`. .` . .' . .. .. ï . 39 Melbourne Soils (ME)- . 40 Middlemarch Soil.'s`(MI) . ........... .. .'. .t . '~. .. :`: : . :'40 Muirkirk Soils (MK) . .,, . .. ... 41 .,,,. ...~..- Muriel Soils (MU) .. .-'`-''. , . .' : . 42 . : . _ ~ .. Y:. , Norrnandâle Soils'(NO) . .'.' : . : . _ : r . 42 Plainfield Soils (PF) . 43 .. .. .23 . Shédden'Soils (SHY . .-`'. .. .. .. .. .44. .. Silver Hill Soils (SL) . 44 Southwold Soils (SO) . 45 Springwater Soils (SP) . 45 Strathburn Soils (ST) . 46 St. Williams Soils (SW) . .. 46 Tavistock Soils (TA) . 47 Toledo Soils(TO) . : . .48 Tuscola Soils (TU) . .49 Vittoria Soils (VI) . .49 Walsher Soils (WA) . 50 Walsingham Soils (WM) . 50 Waterin Soils (WN) . 51 Wattford Soils (WF) . 52 Wauseon Soils (WU) . .52 Miscellaneous Land Unit Descriptions . 53 Alluvium (AL) . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rank of Pops
    Table 1.3 Basic Pop Trends County by County Census 2001 - place names pop_1996 pop_2001 % diff rank order absolute 1996-01 Sorted by absolute pop growth on growth pop growth - Canada 28,846,761 30,007,094 1,160,333 4.0 - Ontario 10,753,573 11,410,046 656,473 6.1 - York Regional Municipality 1 592,445 729,254 136,809 23.1 - Peel Regional Municipality 2 852,526 988,948 136,422 16.0 - Toronto Division 3 2,385,421 2,481,494 96,073 4.0 - Ottawa Division 4 721,136 774,072 52,936 7.3 - Durham Regional Municipality 5 458,616 506,901 48,285 10.5 - Simcoe County 6 329,865 377,050 47,185 14.3 - Halton Regional Municipality 7 339,875 375,229 35,354 10.4 - Waterloo Regional Municipality 8 405,435 438,515 33,080 8.2 - Essex County 9 350,329 374,975 24,646 7.0 - Hamilton Division 10 467,799 490,268 22,469 4.8 - Wellington County 11 171,406 187,313 15,907 9.3 - Middlesex County 12 389,616 403,185 13,569 3.5 - Niagara Regional Municipality 13 403,504 410,574 7,070 1.8 - Dufferin County 14 45,657 51,013 5,356 11.7 - Brant County 15 114,564 118,485 3,921 3.4 - Northumberland County 16 74,437 77,497 3,060 4.1 - Lanark County 17 59,845 62,495 2,650 4.4 - Muskoka District Municipality 18 50,463 53,106 2,643 5.2 - Prescott and Russell United Counties 19 74,013 76,446 2,433 3.3 - Peterborough County 20 123,448 125,856 2,408 2.0 - Elgin County 21 79,159 81,553 2,394 3.0 - Frontenac County 22 136,365 138,606 2,241 1.6 - Oxford County 23 97,142 99,270 2,128 2.2 - Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 24 102,575 104,670 2,095 2.0 - Perth County 25 72,106 73,675
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk County State of the Environment Poster
    Long Point Region Grand River Conservation 20 CON 1 Six Nations IND IAN LI Conservation Authority Authority NE CON 2 C O C K S H U T O T AD L R D O O H A I D D R G H OR W F T A Y Brant County N A 2 CON 3 4 Kelvin BR Bealton H I G H Wilsonville ST W 19 EA AY K 2 COUNTY ROAD R EL CON 1 FOLK O 4 NOR V AD IN Boston C CON 4 O U N T Y LI NE 9 EAST Grand River CON 2 OAD 1 LK COUNTY R NORFO 19 Conservation Authority 1 25 2 C CON 5 O 74 3 C K 4 S H H U 5 I T G T 6 H W R O CON 3 O K 7 AY LD A EL Vanessa 24 D 2 V H 4 8 E 23 I S N RO T I Bill's Corners (Nanticoke) W 19 GH 9 ROAD 22 UNTY 10 K CO W 21 A FOL OR AY D 11 N 2 20 12 4 CON 6 19 Long Point Region 13 18 14 17 15 15 16 E CON 4 S T Conservation Authority W 17 D 19 14 TY ROA COUN 13 18 FOLK NOR T 12 E 19 E T 11 E 20 R V 10 21 IL L 9 CON 7 22 RE O 23 A 8 D 24 D 7 A O 6 R RD 5 FO 4 CONNT 5 3 Teeterville RA State of the Environment B 2 1 M A I N S CON 8 T R E Villa Nova E T H T N H R I O G OAD EAST H SON R W M THOMP AY CON 6 A Waterford I 2 N 4 S T Forestry and Carolinian Canada R E E Legend T H S T O U CON 9 TEETERVILLE RO LPRCA Land THOMPSON Norfolk County has approximately 24 per cent forest cover with CON 7 9 24 ROAD EAST EST MPSON ROAD W more in the western end of Norfolk versus the east.
    [Show full text]
  • ST. THOMAS 2010 INTERNATIONAL PLOWING MATCH St
    EVENTS SCHEDULE AND SITE MAP ELGIN- ST. THOMAS 2010 INTERNATIONAL PLOWING MATCH St. Thomas, Ontario September 21-25, 2010 Proudly presented by ~· ONTARIO PLOWMEN'S ASSOCIATION ~ , AND 2010 IPM · · ' Proud Supporters of DAILY PROGRAMS - SITE MAPS - EXHIBITORS LISTING 1-H OntariO ontario mutuaIs TM •• .-. CT C :J V>OJg.~ ~g-o ::r c ::J .... ~0 Ill c tt>=a.:r Illn ::J,.... Ql -· """ -a.roro ~5.~~ .... OJ - ... V> Ill .... " ::J ... ... I~ "U s:" V>........ ... :E 3ls:(b B: o· g~ '< = 0 . ::r ::r Ill Q.ii>::J Ill Ill /1) ::t'=:l 3 ... - V> 0 10 0 OJ ~ 8 CD "" 0 -· 0 lb :E ~ 3 ::r .... !:!. 3 - ... .... 0 0 -~ 0 - V> 3 ~ CT 3 ::J re ~ "0 n Ill - V> ::J ::J c CD - · !0 n "U O~Q' l~-z-OJ ::J t\ :::s :T::J ... c ... 10 ::;· ;::;: OJ - /1) Ill 0 0 ::;· ::JQ..() " iii" :rca V> - -< '<Ill ::r- CIO c :E V> :T::J- 0 Ill Ill Ill ::J CT a. -· a. Ill ::J Ill -· ro-o - a. ~. 3-< n -.,-o CIO 11>10 "0 ~0 ,..10 "0 ::r /1) ::r -· -·q ::r- s: 9-s: ::J -·co OJ < Q. Ill OJ . -- Ill OJ a. =;· lb CT Ill fi :::S CD - ffi -< c ::r 0 10 '< V> 3 OJ ro- ::J ca .. :;::· 0 ~ Ill ,..... " -· -· c .... ::J 3 :E q V> I ::J ::J Ill .... 0 /1) -· ::J CD:r 1010 ~ 3 0 - OJ ~· 0 ... ,.... ~ I - '< a. 0 0 :E V> -· .... 0 ::TOJ'< 0- ~ 0 >< ~ OJ ::J a. ::J ,..., ::r"" CT~Il> Ill " .... a. 0 !:. .... iii Ill n ~ -,..::J 0 V> l: lb 0 a.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipalprofile.Pdf
    02 Location, Location, Location! Elgin County is ideally situated in the heart of The U.S. border is just a short 2-hour drive away, southwestern Ontario with immediate access to enabling fast transport and just-in-time delivery a market of over 439,000 people, including the of products to customers south of the border. cities of St. Thomas and London. More than 10 For air transportation, the St. Thomas municipal 1 million people are located within a 2 /2 hour airport is nearby, with facilities that accommodate drive. Strategically located with convenient recreational and commercial activities. access to Highways 401, 402 and 403, the cities of Windsor, the GTA, London, Woodstock, Chatham-Kent, and Brantford are all within easy reach. 03 Elgin County Situated in the heart of southwestern Ontario on the north shore of The cities of St. Thomas and London are in close proximity to Lake Erie, Elgin County has enjoyed a long and colourful history since communities in Elgin County, with St. Thomas geographically located its origins as the Talbot settlement in 1803. in the centre of it all. Although not a part of Elgin County, these two cities put the County within close or easy reach of a market of 439,000 Founded as a primarily agricultural community, the County has 1 people. More than 10 million exists within a 2 /2 hour drive, including established a solid base of manufacturing, ship building, commercial the cities of Toronto, Hamilton, Niagara Falls and Windsor. fishing, rail, and tourism industries. Key manufacturers that have done business in and around Elgin County include Ford of Canada, Steelway Population and Labour Force Building Systems, and Imperial Tobacco.
    [Show full text]
  • Elgin County
    Measuring Farmland Loss Research Project ELGIN COUNTY 1 2 Total Land Area (Census 2016) : 1,881.03 km 2 Area of Census Farms (2016) : 152,675 ha Area of Census Farms (2001): 154,907 ha Gross Farm Receipts (2016) 4: $432.6 Million Gross Farm Receipts per Hectare of Census Farm: $2,833.47 Population (2016)1: 88,978 Growth Rate 2006-20115: 2.5% Growth Rate 2011-20161: 1.7% Prime Agricultural Area Redesignated To A Development Designation (Including 241.81 ha Urban, Residential, And Employment) 2000–2017 Prime Agricultural Area Redesignated To A Rural Designation 2000–2017 0 Land Designated As A Prime Agricultural Area With A Site-Specific Amendment To 0 Allow Additional Uses 2000–2017 Total Amount of Prime Agricultural Land Loss 2000–2017 241.81 ha Total Prime Agricultural Land Loss in Relation to Census Farm Area 2001 0.16% Purpose of the Summary This county summary is part of a wider study on farmland availability in Ontario. The study quantifies the conversion of prime agricultural areas based on Official Plan Amendments in upper and single-tier municipalities across the province over a 17-year study period from 2000-2017. This summary is meant to provide detail of the findings in Elgin County. In conjunction with similar case studies from other counties/regions in Ontario, these findings will form the basis of the University of Guelph’s Measuring Farmland Conversion research project. Methods in Brief The study involved the examination of Official Plan Amendments (OPAs) approved by Elgin County, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, and/or the Ontario Municipal Board for Elgin County during the years 2000—2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Starting and Operation an Alternative Accommodation
    Guide to Starting and Operating an Alternative Accommodation Business in Norfolk County January 2020 Guide to Starting and Operating an Alternative Accommodation Business in Norfolk County © 2020 Norfolk County Acknowledgments This guide was made possible with funding from Norfolk County, Haldimand County, Elgin County, Southwestern Ontario Tourism Corp., and the Government of Ontario. Special thanks to Mellor Murray Consulting and staff at all municipalities and SWOTC for making it a reality. 2 Guide to Starting and Operating an Alternative Accommodation Business in Norfolk County Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 4 Establishing an Alternative Accommodation ................................................................. 11 Operating an Alternative Accommodation ..................................................................... 20 Marketing and Promoting Alternative Accommodation .................................................. 22 Renting your Property ................................................................................................... 24 Frequently Asked Questions ......................................................................................... 27 Resources for Operators of Alternative Accommodation............................................... 33 Additional Reading ........................................................................................................ 43 Primary Contacts ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Elgin County Greenway Mapping Methodology
    Elgin Greenway Conservation Action Plan Prepared by Jarmo Jalava, Stanley Caveney, Mark Carabetta, Daria Koscinski, Rhonda Donley and the Elgin Greenway CAP Development Team Carolinian Canada Coalition In partnership with Ontario Nature & the Thames Talbot Land Trust Assistance for this project was provided by the Government of Ontario and Environment Environnement Canada Canada Habitat Stewardship Program for Species At Risk i Recommended citation: Jalava, J.V., S. Caveney, M. Carabetta, D. Koscinski, R. Donley and the Elgin Greenway CAP Development Team. 2012. Elgin Greenway Conservation Action Plan. Carolinian Canada Coalition, London, Ontario. x + 53 pp. + appendices. Cover photo © John St. Pierre ii Table of Contents Plan Authors, CAP Team and Contributors .................................................................... iv i. Background & Rationale ............................................................................................. vi 1. Conservation Context....................................................................................................1 i. Geographic Context .......................................................................................................1 ii. Historical, Cultural and Socioeconomic Context .........................................................2 iii. Ecological Context ......................................................................................................4 iv. Natural Cover / Ecosystem Types .............................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study on the Simcoe Adult Community Centre, Talbot Gardens Arena and the Simcoe Recreation Centre
    Norfolk County Feasibility Study on the Simcoe Adult Community Centre, Talbot Gardens Arena and the Simcoe Recreation Centre. Version 5.0 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1-1 2 RECREATION FACILITIES PROFILE ..................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 TALBOT GARDENS .................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Overview ................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Building Condition ..................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.3 Ice Time Utilization .................................................................................................... 2-2 2.1.4 Current Community Use ............................................................................................ 2-4 2.1.5 Financial Operating Profile ........................................................................................ 2-4 2.1.6 Conclusion................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.2 SIMCOE RECREATION CENTRE .................................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Police in Ontario Police Associations OPP Detachments
    Email Contact List – Police in Ontario Police Associations OPP Detachments Note: This is a list of all known email addresses for Police in Ontario. It is meant for informational purposes only. It is not meant for anyone to send numerous emails to the Police, which could be interpreted as harassment. We encourage respectful communication for any interaction with the Police, no matter which province/territory they reside in. ~ thank you….Stand Up Canada List of Ontario Police Associations - Alphabetical Order Police Association of Ontario PAO Contacts: You can reach the Police http://www.pao.ca Association of Ontario via the following channels: Mail:2 Carlton Street, Suite 901. Toronto, ON There are 46 in Ontario M5B 1J3 Phone: 416.487.9367 We were only able to find 35 email addresses Email:[email protected] For media inquiries, please contact [email protected]. 46 ONTARIO POLICE ASSOCIATIONS 34 KNOWN EMAIL ADDRESSES Copy & Paste ALL or INDIVIDUAL Akwesasne [email protected] Aylmer [email protected] Barrie [email protected] Belleville Brantford [email protected] Brockville [email protected] Chatham-Kent [email protected] Cobourg [email protected] Cornwall Deep River [email protected] Dryden [email protected] Durham Regional [email protected] Gananoque [email protected] Guelph Halton Region [email protected] Hamilton [email protected] Hanover Kingston City [email protected] Lasalle [email protected] Published: May 10, 2021 Page 1 of 5 Lindsay [email protected] London [email protected] Niagara Parks Niagara Region [email protected] North Bay [email protected] Ontario Provincial Police [email protected] Ottawa [email protected] Owen Sound [email protected] Peel Regional [email protected] Peterborough [email protected] Port Hope [email protected] Sarnia [email protected] Saugeen Shores Sault Ste.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol10 3 3 7.Pdf (1.482Mb)
    3 THE PROCEEDINGS PART III Figure 1. Brantford Town Hall, 1849-50. JOHN TURNER AND ENGLISH ARCHITECTURAL INFLUENCE IN SOUTHWESTERN ONTARIO by Paul Dilse 4 Introduction John Turner's impact on the architecture of Brantford, Ontario and surrounding towns in the nineteenth century was great. He ar­ rived from England when Brantford was, as his obituary states, "a scattered village" and lived to see it become a leading industrial city.' r· Turner's forty-year career in Canada, made possible by the oppor­ tunity for Englishmen to find employment in a British colony, was encouraged by economic growth in the region where he settled. His ability to meet the diverse needs of his clients and to master the rapid succession of ninetheenth century styles ensured his success. While his early wourk shows the infuence of his English training and sen­ E sibility, Turner's later work is a product of his clients' various tastes, :::0 Q) his own Victorian interest in multiple styles and American influence. Cl) ~ Early Influences >- " ~ John Turner was born in Wales in 1807. He may have been rais­ ed in an area along the Welsh-English border if he indeed belonged 8 to the Whitchurch, Shropshire family of architects listed in Colvin's ~ ~ _., ~ A Biographical Dictionary of British Architects 1600 · 1840. __ Figure 2. Original Brant County Courthouse, 1852·3. His obituary credits his training to the Cubiti brothers of Lon­ don. He was probably working for the firm in 1827 when he married count for this two Gothic Revival churches-the Wellington Street his first wife in London parish.' The Cubitts, who are considered to Wesleyan Methodist Church and Grace Anglican Church, both in be the greatest urban developers of their time, principally designed Brantford.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA – SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING #3 April 3, 2020 1:00 P.M
    AGENDA – SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING #3 April 3, 2020 1:00 p.m. 1. Opening of the Meeting 2. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest 3. Adoption of Draft Minutes a) Draft Special Council Meeting #1 Minutes – March 24, 2020 b) Draft Special Council Meeting #2 Minutes – March 24, 2020 4. Regular Council Meeting Schedule 5. Public Works Department • Acting Manager of Roads and Facilites Monthly Report – March 2020 6. Water Department • Water Operations Manager Monthly Report – March 2020 7. Wastewater Department • Wastewater Operator Monthly Report – March 2020 8. Building Department • Monthly Permit Summary – March 2020 9. Fire Department • Fire Chief Monthly Report – March 2020 10. Drainage a) Drainage Superintendent Monthly Report – March 2020 b) Ontario Regulation 73/20 and the Drainage Act c) Appoint the Engineer for the Keith Drain 11. Planning • Dutton Dunwich Cultural Heritage Committee – Member Appointments 12. Correspondence 1 | Page 13. Consent Correspondence Consent Correspondence a) ULower Thames Valley Conservation AuthorityU – 2020 Approved Budget b) UMinistry of Municipal Affairs and HousingU – Protecting Tenants and Strengthening Community Housing Act c) UNorfolk CountyU – Issues re: the Mapping of Provincially Significant Wetlands (PSWs) d) UKaren Vecchio, MPU – Constituency Office Closed for Precautionary Measures Against COVID-9 e) UElgin CountyU – Council Highlights March 10, 2020 f) UElgin CountyU – COVID-19 Media Update March 23, 2020 g) UMunicipal Enforcement UnitU – COVID-19 Enforcement h) UPool & Hot Tub AllianceU – Maintaining Public Aquatic Facilities i) UCN RailwayU – Discontinuance of Cayuga Line Committee Reports • By-Law Enforcement • Community Policing Committee o December 16, 2019 meeting minutes • Cultural Heritage Committee • Dutton Dunwich Senior’s • Economic Development Committee • Elgin Phragmites Working Group • Elgin-St.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL HISTORIC SITES Ontario Region NATIONAL HISTORIC SITES Ontario Region Published Under the Authority of the Minister of the Environment Ottawa 1980
    Parks Pares Canada Canada NATIONAL HISTORIC SITES Ontario Region NATIONAL HISTORIC SITES Ontario Region Published under the authority of the Minister of the Environment Ottawa 1980 QS-C066-000-BB-A1 © Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1980 Design & Illustrations: Ludvic Saleh, Ottawa INTRODUCTION One of the most effective ways to stimulate popular interest and understanding of Canadian history is to focus attention to those specific locations most directly associated with our history. Since 1922, the Federal government has erected plaques and monuments on the recommendation of the Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada to commemorate persons, places or events which are of national historic signifi­ cance. Locations where such commemorations take place are called national historic sites. There are now almost 800 of these sites in Canada, of which more than 200 are in Ontario. This booklet is intended to introduce the reader to those elements of Canadian national historical heritage singled out for commemoration in Ontario. For your convenience, the sites are listed alphabetically as well as by County. iv BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Historic Sites and Monuments proposals. Board of Canada is an advisory body to The Board is assisted by Parks Canada the Minister responsible for Parks through studies of broad historical Canada and acts as an "Independent themes and research on specific per­ Jury" in determining whether persons, sons, places or events. In addition, places or events, are of national historic Parks Canada will co-operate with local, or architectural importance. provincial and territorial governments It is normally comprised of 17 members: and other interested groups, including 14 representatives from the 10 provinces local historical societies, in making and two territories (2 each from Ontario arrangements for formal ceremonies to and Quebec and one each from the re­ unveil a plaque or monument.
    [Show full text]