DOCSLIB.ORG

Feasibility Study on the Simcoe Adult Community Centre, Talbot Gardens Arena and the Simcoe Recreation Centre

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Feasibility Study on the Simcoe Adult Community Centre, Talbot Gardens Arena and the Simcoe Recreation Centre Norfolk County Feasibility Study on the Simcoe Adult Community Centre, Talbot Gardens Arena and the Simcoe Recreation Centre. Version 5.0 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1-1 2 RECREATION FACILITIES PROFILE ..................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 TALBOT GARDENS .................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Overview ................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Building Condition ..................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.3 Ice Time Utilization .................................................................................................... 2-2 2.1.4 Current Community Use ............................................................................................ 2-4 2.1.5 Financial Operating Profile ........................................................................................ 2-4 2.1.6 Conclusion................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.2 SIMCOE RECREATION CENTRE .................................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.1 Overview ................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.2.2 Building Condition Study ........................................................................................... 2-6 2.2.3 Utilization ................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.2.4 Usage Profile ............................................................................................................. 2-8 2.2.5 Financial Operating Profile ........................................................................................ 2-8 2.2.6 Summary ................................................................................................................. 2-10 2.3 SIMCOE ADULT COMMUNITY CENTRE....................................................................................................................... 2-10 2.3.1 Overview ................................................................................................................. 2-10 2.3.2 Building Condition Study ......................................................................................... 2-10 2.3.3 Utilization ................................................................................................................. 2-11 2.3.4 Financial Operating Profile ...................................................................................... 2-12 2.3.5 Summary ................................................................................................................. 2-12 3 COMMUNITY PROFILE AND DEMOGRAPHICS ................................................................. 3-1 3.1 OVERALL SETTING.................................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 CURRENT POPULATION ............................................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2.1 Norfolk County .......................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.2 Simcoe ...................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.2.3 Port Dover ................................................................................................................. 3-4 3.2.4 Delhi .......................................................................................................................... 3-4 3.2.5 Waterford................................................................................................................... 3-4 3.2.6 Port Rowan................................................................................................................ 3-4 3.2.7 Courtland ................................................................................................................... 3-4 3.3 HISTORICAL POPULATION GROWTH ........................................................................................................................... 3-4 3.3.1 Population Projection ................................................................................................ 3-5 3.3.2 Urban Centres ........................................................................................................... 3-5 3.4 ETHNICITY ................................................................................................................................................................ 3-7 Norfolk County FEASIBILITY STUDY Table of Contents i 3.4.1 Families and Households .......................................................................................... 3-7 3.4.2 Education .................................................................................................................. 3-8 3.4.3 Summary ................................................................................................................... 3-8 4 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT .................................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 FOCUS GROUPS AND COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS ........................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2.1 What Is Working: ....................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2.2 Main Issues and Concerns........................................................................................ 4-2 4.2.3 Future Trends ............................................................................................................ 4-2 4.2.4 Top Priorities ............................................................................................................. 4-3 4.3 COMMUNITY SURVEY ................................................................................................................................................ 4-3 4.3.1 Indoor Recreation Facilities (Arenas, Pools) ............................................................. 4-3 4.3.2 Community Halls, Senior Centres ............................................................................. 4-4 4.3.3 Programming (Comments on Specific Programs or Activities) ................................. 4-4 4.3.4 Service Delivery (Fees, Staffing Administration, Operations) ................................... 4-4 4.4 FUTURE OF PROGRAMS AND FACILITIES .................................................................................................................... 4-4 4.5 COMMUNITY ACTIVITY RECREATION EXCELLENCE COMMITTEE (CARE) SESSION ........................................................ 4-5 5 PARTICIPATION AND FACILITY TRENDS ......................................................................... 5-1 5.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 SOCIETAL AND LEISURE TRENDS .............................................................................................................................. 5-1 5.2.1 Aging And Youth Populations ................................................................................... 5-1 5.2.2 Sport Activities .......................................................................................................... 5-3 5.2.3 Facility Quality ........................................................................................................... 5-5 5.2.4 Tourism And Sport Tourism ...................................................................................... 5-6 5.2.5 Community, Health, Educational, Social And Policy Services Integration ................ 5-6 5.2.6 User Fees And Charges And Affordability ................................................................ 5-7 5.2.7 Market Segmentation / Services Differentiation ........................................................ 5-8 5.2.8 Collaboration, Partnership and Joint Ventures ......................................................... 5-9 5.2.9 Capital and Operating Finances ............................................................................... 5-9 5.2.10 Evaluation................................................................................................................ 5-11 5.2.11 Multi-Use / Multi-Partner Facilities .......................................................................... 5-12 5.2.12 Capital Facility Maintenance ................................................................................... 5-12 5.2.13 Summary ................................................................................................................. 5-13 6 LOCATION AND PARTNERSHIPS ........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Family, Human Rights, and Worker Invisibility in Seasonal Mexican Farm Worker Agricultural Migrations to Canada, 1974–Present1
    Labours of Love: Family, Human Rights, and Worker Invisibility in Seasonal Mexican Farm Worker Agricultural Migrations to Canada, 1974–Present1 Naomi Alisa Calnitsky “Behind every fruit and vegetable for sale in the supermarket lies an unknown world of toil and skill.”2 “I was harvesting squash in the field near my village one day, when my patrón came and said, ‘Irena, you should go to Canada. There’s now a program there for women.’ And I said, ‘How can I go to Canada, if I haven’t even been to Mexico City?’”3 Introduction The Canadian Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program (SAWP) originated in an “off- shore program” initiated by the Canadian government in 1966, with the goal of co- ordinating a seasonal Caribbean labour supply for the province of Ontario. The program grew in significance from the mid-1970s, after being extended to Mexico in 1974. The SAWP’s emergence in the latter half of the twentieth century can be read as part of a longer history of managed agricultural migration on the North American continent. In the United States, a bilaterally-coordinated labour scheme was introduced on a large scale with the Mexican Farm Labour Program (MFLP)— later known as the Bracero Program—which was initiated in 1942 and ended by the Kennedy Administration in 1964. This article focuses on a particular strand of Canadian SAWP history to consider how migrant workers were portrayed in the archive, and unpacks early journalistic interviews with Mexican farm workers in Manitoba, which recorded the SAWP’s emergence in its early phases. It brings modern-day migrant voices into conversation with an existing academic literature that has, for the most part, high- lighted the exploitation inherent to a program in which workers were increasingly rendered invisible and marginal, especially with respect to their full and equal par- ticipation in the Canadian economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction Du Branch Patrimoine De I'edition
    Beyond the bunkhouse: Exploring the learning of Frontier College labourer-teachers by Joseph Adam Perry A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Adult Education and Counselling Psychology Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto © Copyright by Joseph Adam Perry 2008 Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-44886-1 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-44886-1 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Rank of Pops
    Table 1.3 Basic Pop Trends County by County Census 2001 - place names pop_1996 pop_2001 % diff rank order absolute 1996-01 Sorted by absolute pop growth on growth pop growth - Canada 28,846,761 30,007,094 1,160,333 4.0 - Ontario 10,753,573 11,410,046 656,473 6.1 - York Regional Municipality 1 592,445 729,254 136,809 23.1 - Peel Regional Municipality 2 852,526 988,948 136,422 16.0 - Toronto Division 3 2,385,421 2,481,494 96,073 4.0 - Ottawa Division 4 721,136 774,072 52,936 7.3 - Durham Regional Municipality 5 458,616 506,901 48,285 10.5 - Simcoe County 6 329,865 377,050 47,185 14.3 - Halton Regional Municipality 7 339,875 375,229 35,354 10.4 - Waterloo Regional Municipality 8 405,435 438,515 33,080 8.2 - Essex County 9 350,329 374,975 24,646 7.0 - Hamilton Division 10 467,799 490,268 22,469 4.8 - Wellington County 11 171,406 187,313 15,907 9.3 - Middlesex County 12 389,616 403,185 13,569 3.5 - Niagara Regional Municipality 13 403,504 410,574 7,070 1.8 - Dufferin County 14 45,657 51,013 5,356 11.7 - Brant County 15 114,564 118,485 3,921 3.4 - Northumberland County 16 74,437 77,497 3,060 4.1 - Lanark County 17 59,845 62,495 2,650 4.4 - Muskoka District Municipality 18 50,463 53,106 2,643 5.2 - Prescott and Russell United Counties 19 74,013 76,446 2,433 3.3 - Peterborough County 20 123,448 125,856 2,408 2.0 - Elgin County 21 79,159 81,553 2,394 3.0 - Frontenac County 22 136,365 138,606 2,241 1.6 - Oxford County 23 97,142 99,270 2,128 2.2 - Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 24 102,575 104,670 2,095 2.0 - Perth County 25 72,106 73,675
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Daily Press: March 23,1868
    PORTLAND DAILY PRESS. FM'MUhed June 23,3863, Foi. r. MONDAY MORNING. MARCH PORTLAND, 3^, 1868. Terms $8.00 per annum, in advance. THIS PORTLAND DAILY PRESS is published BUSINESS CARDS. COPARTNERSHIP NOTICES. SCHOOLS. at miscellaneous. Portland and Rutland every day, (Sunday excepted,) No. 1 Printers’ Railroad. burg Trom Portland 1, Exchange, Exchange Street, Portland. by w„ (f DAILY PRESS. To thi Editor ttf the Prett Island Pond and tbe N. A. FOSTER, Proprietor. NATHAN Dissolution oi No. G. Mis*),!,,,,.) Valley, a WEBB, Copartnership. Portland In route remarkably favorable Terms -.—Eight Dollars a year in advance, Academy! P®RTLAND. noticing ray communication on the for the construc- a road py Single copies 4 cents. Counsellor and PORTLAND, March 16.1f«8. No*. 14 and 36 middle Street, 8IMILIA Portland and Rutland Railroad in your tion of .having easy grades all the at Law, HE copartnership heretofore exisiing under tbe 8IMIL1B08 OURAUTUR. the Attorney hrm of THE MAINE ST \TK PkESS. is published at T„_ Brown & Mori 111, la this day dUsulred FOR YOUNG LADIES AND GENTLEMEN I Thursday’s Issue, you speak of an “appar- way. a No. OI St. mutual cor si me place every Thursdsy morning at $2.00 year, Exchangfo by sent. Tbe accounts of the Aim will Monday Morning, March 23, 1868. ent be Bett Day aad Keening School. in that “the most At the tine the and Invariably in advance. .roly 141, ed y J. F. Merrill, who will continue the Humphrey’s Inaccuracy" claiming present Import f«p«rt Ear pent an1 nomceopatbic Specifics, direct ring Building business at the old IF" For further particulars plorse send for a Cir- practicable line from Chicago to the trade of Portland depends upon the Grand In stanJt Cross in rear of Advoi tiser cular.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk County State of the Environment Poster
    Long Point Region Grand River Conservation 20 CON 1 Six Nations IND IAN LI Conservation Authority Authority NE CON 2 C O C K S H U T O T AD L R D O O H A I D D R G H OR W F T A Y Brant County N A 2 CON 3 4 Kelvin BR Bealton H I G H Wilsonville ST W 19 EA AY K 2 COUNTY ROAD R EL CON 1 FOLK O 4 NOR V AD IN Boston C CON 4 O U N T Y LI NE 9 EAST Grand River CON 2 OAD 1 LK COUNTY R NORFO 19 Conservation Authority 1 25 2 C CON 5 O 74 3 C K 4 S H H U 5 I T G T 6 H W R O CON 3 O K 7 AY LD A EL Vanessa 24 D 2 V H 4 8 E 23 I S N RO T I Bill's Corners (Nanticoke) W 19 GH 9 ROAD 22 UNTY 10 K CO W 21 A FOL OR AY D 11 N 2 20 12 4 CON 6 19 Long Point Region 13 18 14 17 15 15 16 E CON 4 S T Conservation Authority W 17 D 19 14 TY ROA COUN 13 18 FOLK NOR T 12 E 19 E T 11 E 20 R V 10 21 IL L 9 CON 7 22 RE O 23 A 8 D 24 D 7 A O 6 R RD 5 FO 4 CONNT 5 3 Teeterville RA State of the Environment B 2 1 M A I N S CON 8 T R E Villa Nova E T H T N H R I O G OAD EAST H SON R W M THOMP AY CON 6 A Waterford I 2 N 4 S T Forestry and Carolinian Canada R E E Legend T H S T O U CON 9 TEETERVILLE RO LPRCA Land THOMPSON Norfolk County has approximately 24 per cent forest cover with CON 7 9 24 ROAD EAST EST MPSON ROAD W more in the western end of Norfolk versus the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Accounts of the Province of Ontario for the Year Ended March
    PUBLIC ACCOUNTS, 1994-95 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS Hon. Elmer Buchanan, Minister DETAILS OF EXPENDITURE Voted Salaries and Wages ($87,902,805) Temporary Help Services ($1,329,292): Management Board Secretariat, 1,220,010; Accounts under $50,000—109,282. Less: Recoveries from Other Ministries ($196,635): Environment and Energy, 196,635. Employee Benefits ($13,866,524) Payments for Canada Pension Plan, 1 ,594,486; Dental Plan, 95 1 ,332; Employer Health Tax, 1 ,702,083; Group Life Insurance, 170,970; Long Term Income Protection, 1,028,176; Supplementary Health and Hospital Plan, 1,016,690; Unemployment Insurance, 3,017,224; Unfunded Liability— Public Service Pension Fund, 1,024,574. Other Benefits: Attendance Gratuities, 401,716; Death Benefits, 18,660; Early Retirement Incentive, 467,244; Maternity/Parental/Adoption Leave Allowances, 530,045; Severance Pay, 1,494,057; Miscellaneous Benefits, 51,035. Workers' Compensation Board, 315,097. Payments to Other Ministries ($152,141): Accounts under $50,000—152,141. Less: Recoveries from Other Ministries ($69,006): Accounts under $50,000—69,006. Travelling Expenses ($3,859,979) Hon. Elmer Buchanan, 7,002; P. Klopp, 3,765; R. Burak, 9,912; W.R. Allen, 13,155; D.K. Alles, 16,276; P.M. Angus, 23,969; D. Beattie, 12,681; A. Bierworth, 14,510; J.L. Cushing, 12,125; L.L. Davies, 11,521; P. Dick, 16,999; E.J. Dickson, 11,231; R.C. Donais, 10,703; J.R. Drynan, 10,277; R. Dunlop, 10,662; JJ. Gardner, 43,319; C.L. Goubau, 12,096; N. Harris, 12,593; F.R Hayward, 26,910; M.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Rotary Clubs with 90+ Years of Community Service!
    ROTARY AROUND THE WORLD IS OVER 100 YEARS OLD IN NORFOLK COUNTY ROTARY HAS SERVED THE COMMUNITY ROTARY CLUB OF FOR SIMCOE ROTARY CLUB OF OVER DELHI ROTARY CLUB NORFOLK SUNRISE YEARS90! NORFOLK ROTARACT CLUB 2 A Celebration of Rotary in Norfolk, June 2018 Welcome to the world of Rotary Rotary in Norfolk County Rotary International is a worldwide network of service clubs celebrating in Norfolk more than 100 years of global community service with a convention in Toronto at the end of June. Among the thousands of attendees will be PUBLISHED BY representatives from Norfolk County’s three clubs, as well as an affiliated Rotary Club of Simcoe, Rotary Club of Delhi, Rotary Club of Norfolk Sunrise and Rotaract Club in Norfolk Rotaract Club. ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER Rotary has had a presence in Norfolk County for more than 90 years. Media Pro Publishing Over that time, countless thousands of dollars have been donated to both David Douglas PO Box 367, Waterford, ON N0E 1Y0 community and worldwide humanitarian projects. 519-429-0847 • email: [email protected] The motto of Rotary is “Service Above Self” and local Rotarians have Published June 2018 amply fulfilled that mandate. Copywright Rotary Clubs of Norfolk County, Ontario, Canada This special publication is designed to remind the community of Rotary’s local history and its contributions from its beginning in 1925 to the present. Rotary has left its mark locally with ongoing support of projects and services such as Norfolk General Hospital, the Delhi Community Medical Centre and the Rotary Trail. Equally important are youth services and programs highlighted by international travel opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Fish Community and Fisheries in Eastern Lake Erie Results from the 2000-2004 East Basin Rehabilitation Plan
    Status of the Fish Community and Fisheries in Eastern Lake Erie Results from the 2000-2004 East Basin Rehabilitation Plan Lake Erie Management Unit State of the Resource Report March, 2006 Table of Contents Forward.......................................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures.................................................................................................................................iv List of Tables..................................................................................................................................ix List of Appendices...........................................................................................................................x 1.0 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................1 1.1 The Five Year Plan for Rehabilitation of Eastern Lake Erie Fisheries .............................1 1.2 Ecology of Eastern Lake Erie ............................................................................................4 1.3 Management of Eastern Basin Fisheries............................................................................7 Quota Management............................................................................................................7 Smelt Harvest Management...............................................................................................8 Walleye Harvest Restrictions
    [Show full text]
  • ST. THOMAS 2010 INTERNATIONAL PLOWING MATCH St
    EVENTS SCHEDULE AND SITE MAP ELGIN- ST. THOMAS 2010 INTERNATIONAL PLOWING MATCH St. Thomas, Ontario September 21-25, 2010 Proudly presented by ~· ONTARIO PLOWMEN'S ASSOCIATION ~ , AND 2010 IPM · · ' Proud Supporters of DAILY PROGRAMS - SITE MAPS - EXHIBITORS LISTING 1-H OntariO ontario mutuaIs TM •• .-. CT C :J V>OJg.~ ~g-o ::r c ::J .... ~0 Ill c tt>=a.:r Illn ::J,.... Ql -· """ -a.roro ~5.~~ .... OJ - ... V> Ill .... " ::J ... ... I~ "U s:" V>........ ... :E 3ls:(b B: o· g~ '< = 0 . ::r ::r Ill Q.ii>::J Ill Ill /1) ::t'=:l 3 ... - V> 0 10 0 OJ ~ 8 CD "" 0 -· 0 lb :E ~ 3 ::r .... !:!. 3 - ... .... 0 0 -~ 0 - V> 3 ~ CT 3 ::J re ~ "0 n Ill - V> ::J ::J c CD - · !0 n "U O~Q' l~-z-OJ ::J t\ :::s :T::J ... c ... 10 ::;· ;::;: OJ - /1) Ill 0 0 ::;· ::JQ..() " iii" :rca V> - -< '<Ill ::r- CIO c :E V> :T::J- 0 Ill Ill Ill ::J CT a. -· a. Ill ::J Ill -· ro-o - a. ~. 3-< n -.,-o CIO 11>10 "0 ~0 ,..10 "0 ::r /1) ::r -· -·q ::r- s: 9-s: ::J -·co OJ < Q. Ill OJ . -- Ill OJ a. =;· lb CT Ill fi :::S CD - ffi -< c ::r 0 10 '< V> 3 OJ ro- ::J ca .. :;::· 0 ~ Ill ,..... " -· -· c .... ::J 3 :E q V> I ::J ::J Ill .... 0 /1) -· ::J CD:r 1010 ~ 3 0 - OJ ~· 0 ... ,.... ~ I - '< a. 0 0 :E V> -· .... 0 ::TOJ'< 0- ~ 0 >< ~ OJ ::J a. ::J ,..., ::r"" CT~Il> Ill " .... a. 0 !:. .... iii Ill n ~ -,..::J 0 V> l: lb 0 a.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Parliamentary Guide
    NUNC COGNOSCO EX PARTE THOMAS J. BATA LI BRARY TRENT UNIVERSITY us*<•-« m*.•• ■Jt ,.v<4■■ L V ?' V t - ji: '^gj r ", •W* ~ %- A V- v v; _ •S I- - j*. v \jrfK'V' V ■' * ' ’ ' • ’ ,;i- % »v • > ». --■ : * *S~ ' iJM ' ' ~ : .*H V V* ,-l *» %■? BE ! Ji®». ' »- ■ •:?■, M •* ^ a* r • * «'•# ^ fc -: fs , I v ., V', ■ s> f ** - l' %% .- . **» f-•" . ^ t « , -v ' *$W ...*>v■; « '.3* , c - ■ : \, , ?>?>*)■#! ^ - ••• . ". y(.J, ■- : V.r 4i .» ^ -A*.5- m “ * a vv> w* W,3^. | -**■ , • * * v v'*- ■ ■ !\ . •* 4fr > ,S<P As 5 - _A 4M ,' € - ! „■:' V, ' ' ?**■- i.." ft 1 • X- \ A M .-V O' A ■v ; ■ P \k trf* > i iwr ^.. i - "M - . v •?*»-• -£-. , v 4’ >j- . *•. , V j,r i 'V - • v *? ■ •.,, ;<0 / ^ . ■'■ ■ ,;• v ,< */ ■" /1 ■* * *-+ ijf . ^--v- % 'v-a <&, A * , % -*£, - ^-S*.' J >* •> *' m' . -S' ?v * ... ‘ *•*. * V .■1 *-.«,»'• ■ 1**4. * r- * r J-' ; • * “ »- *' ;> • * arr ■ v * v- > A '* f ' & w, HSi.-V‘ - .'">4-., '4 -' */ ' -',4 - %;. '* JS- •-*. - -4, r ; •'ii - ■.> ¥?<* K V' V ;' v ••: # * r * \'. V-*, >. • s s •*•’ . “ i"*■% * % «. V-- v '*7. : '""•' V v *rs -*• * * 3«f ' <1k% ’fc. s' ^ * ' .W? ,>• ■ V- £ •- .' . $r. « • ,/ ••<*' . ; > -., r;- •■ •',S B. ' F *. ^ , »» v> ' ' •' ' a *' >, f'- \ r ■* * is #* ■ .. n 'K ^ XV 3TVX’ ■■i ■% t'' ■ T-. / .a- ■ '£■ a« .v * tB• f ; a' a :-w;' 1 M! : J • V ^ ’ •' ■ S ii 4 » 4^4•M v vnU :^3£'" ^ v .’'A It/-''-- V. - ;ii. : . - 4 '. ■ ti *%?'% fc ' i * ■ , fc ' THE CANADIAN PARLIAMENTARY GUIDE AND WORK OF GENERAL REFERENCE I9OI FOR CANADA, THE PROVINCES, AND NORTHWEST TERRITORIES (Published with the Patronage of The Parliament of Canada) Containing Election Returns, Eists and Sketches of Members, Cabinets of the U.K., U.S., and Canada, Governments and Eegisla- TURES OF ALL THE PROVINCES, Census Returns, Etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Stage 2-3 Archaeological Assessments Report(PDF)
    Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Ministère du Tourisme, de la Culture et du Sport Sport Culture Programs Unit Unité des programmes culturels Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture 435 S. James Street, Suite 334 435, rue James sud, bureau 334 Thunder Bay ON P7E 6S7 Thunder Bay ON P7E 6S7 Tel.: 807-475-1628 Tél.: 807-475-1628 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] February 1, 2013 Dr. Dean Knight Archaeological Research Associates Ltd. 154 Otonabee Drive Kitchener, ON N2C 1L7 Dear Dr. Knight, RE: Review and Entry into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports: Archaeological Assessment Report Entitled Stage 2 and 3 Archaeological Assessments Port Ryerse Wind Power Project (FIT F-001579-WIN-130-601) Part of Lots 3–5, Broken Front Geographic Township of Woodhouse Norfolk County, Ontario, Revised Report Dated January 14, 2013, Filed by MTCS Toronto Office January 16, 2013, MTCS Project Information Form Number P089-014-2012 & P089- 018-2012, MTCS File Number HD00097 This office has reviewed the above-mentioned report, which has been submitted to this ministry as a condition of licensing in accordance with Part VI of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c 0.18.1 This review has been carried out in order to determine whether the licensed professional consultant archaeologist has met the terms and conditions of their licence, that the licensee assessed the property and documented archaeological resources using a process that accords with the 2011 Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists set by the ministry, and that the archaeological fieldwork and report recommendations are consistent with the conservation, protection and preservation of the cultural heritage of Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Series RG 3-23 Premier Leslie M. Frost General Correspondence
    List of: Government Series RG 3-23 Premier Leslie M. Frost general correspondence Reference File Item Title and Physical Description Date Ordering Information Code Code RG 3-23 Aa - Ad 1949-1961 To view, order RG 3-23, in 1 file of textual records container B292277 RG 3-23 Adams 1950-1961 To view, order RG 3-23, in 1 file of textual records container B292277 RG 3-23 Abernethy, Mr. W.W. 1952-1958 To view, order RG 3-23, in 1 file of textual records container B292277 RG 3-23 Abitibi Power and Paper Co. 1957-1961 To view, order RG 3-23, in 1 file of textual records container B292277 RG 3-23 Abitibi Power and Paper and Grand Trunk Pacific 1951-1960 To view, order RG 3-23, in Blocks (2) container B292277 1 file of textual records RG 3-23 Ackerman, Mr. P., Montreal 1951-1959 To view, order RG 3-23, in 1 file of textual records container B292277 RG 3-23 Acres, Mr. A.H., Britannia Bay 1951 To view, order RG 3-23, in 1 file of textual records container B292277 RG 3-23 Administration of Justice C'tee 1956 To view, order RG 3-23, in 1 file of textual records container B292277 RG 3-23 Adolphustown, proposed Prov. Park 1956-1959 To view, order RG 3-23, in 1 file of textual records container B292277 RG 3-23 Adoption Practices 1957 To view, order RG 3-23, in 1 file of textual records container B292277 RG 3-23 Advertising 1958-1959 To view, order RG 3-23, in 1 file of textual records container B292277 RG 3-23 Ae - Ag 1952-1960 To view, order RG 3-23, in 1 file of textual records container B292278 RG 3-23 Agriculture, Dept of - Minister's File 1952-1961
    [Show full text]