DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents Long Point Region SPA Approved Assessment Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 8.0 OVERVIEW OF THE WATER BUDGET FRAMEWORK .......................................... 8-1 9.0 TIER 2 WATER BUDGET ......................................................................................... 9-3 9.1 Surface Water Budget ............................................................................................... 9-4 9.1.1 Surface Water Budget ................................................................................. 9-4 9.2 Groundwater Budget .................................................................................................. 9-7 9.2.1 Groundwater Budget .................................................................................... 9-7 9.3 Integrated Water Budget ............................................................................................ 9-9 9.3.1 Big Otter Creek Above Maple Dell Road Subwatershed ........................... 9-13 9.3.2 Otter Creek at Otterville Subwatershed ..................................................... 9-13 9.3.3 Spittler Creek Subwatershed ..................................................................... 9-14 9.3.4 Otter Creek at Tillsonburg Subwatershed .................................................. 9-14 9.3.5 Little Otter Creek Subwatershed ................................................................ 9-15 9.3.6 Lower Otter Creek Subwatershed.............................................................. 9-15 9.3.7 South Otter and Clear Creek Subwatersheds ............................................ 9-16 9.3.8 Big Creek Above Cement Road Subwatershed ......................................... 9-16 9.3.9 Big Creek Above Kelvin Subwatershed ..................................................... 9-17 9.3.10 Big Creek Above Delhi Subwatershed ....................................................... 9-17 9.3.11 North Creek Subwatershed........................................................................ 9-17 9.3.12 Big Creek Above Minnow Creek Subwatershed ........................................ 9-18 9.3.13 Big Creek Above Walsingham Subwatershed ........................................... 9-18 9.3.14 Venison Creek Subwatershed ................................................................... 9-19 9.3.15 Lower Big Creek Subwatershed ................................................................ 9-19 9.3.16 Dedrick Creek and Young/Hay Creeks Subwatersheds ............................ 9-20 9.3.17 Lynn River Subwatershed .......................................................................... 9-20 9.3.18 Black Creek Subwatershed........................................................................ 9-21 9.3.19 Upper Nanticoke Creek Subwatershed ...................................................... 9-21 9.3.20 Lower Nanticoke Creek, Sandusk Creek and Stoney Creek Subwatersheds .......................................................................................... 9-21 9.4 Interactions Between Groundwater and Surface Water .......................................... 9-22 9.5 Tier 2 Water Quantity Stress Assessment ............................................................... 9-24 9.5.1 Surface Water Stress Assessment ............................................................ 9-24 9.5.2 Groundwater Stress Assessment .............................................................. 9-27 May 20, 2020 TOC-1 Long Point Region SPA Approved Assessment Report 9.5.3 Groundwater Stress Assessment Results ................................................. 9-27 9.6 Section Summary .................................................................................................... 9-31 10.0 TIER 3 WATER BUDGET AND RISK ASSESSMENT ........................................... 10-1 10.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 10-1 10.1.1 Tier 3 Assessment Methodology................................................................ 10-2 Estimated Allocated Rates .................................................................................. 10-2 Characterization, Model Development and Calibration ....................................... 10-2 Delineate Vulnerable Areas ................................................................................ 10-2 Complete Risk Assessment ................................................................................ 10-3 Assign Risk Level to Vulnerable Area ................................................................. 10-3 Identify Drinking Water Threats ........................................................................... 10-4 10.2 Groundwater and Surface Water Characterization .................................................. 10-4 10.2.1 Topography and Physiography .................................................................. 10-4 10.2.2 Surface Water Features ............................................................................. 10-5 10.2.3 Geology and Hydrogeology ....................................................................... 10-5 Hydrogeologic Field Program .............................................................................. 10-5 Regional Characterization ................................................................................... 10-6 Local Characterization – Delhi ............................................................................ 10-7 Local Characterization – Simcoe ........................................................................ 10-7 Local Characterization – Waterford ..................................................................... 10-8 10.2.4 Water Demand and Other Water Uses ...................................................... 10-8 Municipal Water Supply Systems ........................................................................ 10-8 Non-Municipal Water Demand ............................................................................ 10-9 Other Water Uses; Coldwater Streams and Provincially Significant Wetlands ... 10-9 10.2.5 Land Use and Land Use Development .................................................... 10-10 10.3 Risk Assessment ................................................................................................... 10-19 10.3.1 Model Development ................................................................................. 10-19 Groundwater Flow Model .................................................................................. 10-19 Integrated Numerical Models ............................................................................ 10-20 10.3.2 Risk Assessment Results ........................................................................ 10-20 10.3.3 Significant Water Quantity Threats .......................................................... 10-22 10.3.4 Significant Groundwater Recharge Areas................................................ 10-22 10.4 Risk Management Measures Evaluation ............................................................... 10-29 10.5 Section Summary .................................................................................................. 10-29 May 20, 2020 TOC-2 Long Point Region SPA Approved Assessment Report LIST OF MAPS Map 9-1: Modelled Groundwater Discharge Map in the Long Point Region Watershed . 9-23 Map 9-2: Tier 2 Surface Water Stress Assessment in the Long Point Region Watershed ......................................................................................................................... 9-26 Map 9-3: Water Quantity Stress Levels by Groundwater Sub-watershed in the Long Point Region Watershed .................................................................................. 9-30 Map 10-1: Tier 3 Study and Focus Area .......................................................................... 10-12 Map 10-2: Tier 3 Focus Area - Surface Water Features .................................................. 10-13 Map 10-3: Tier 3 Focus Area - High Quality Well Locations ............................................ 10-14 Map 10-4: Tier 3 Focus Area - Shallow Groundwater Levels .......................................... 10-15 Map 10-5: Tier 3 Focus Area - Deep Groundwater Levels .............................................. 10-16 Map 10-6: Tier 3 Focus Area – Provincially Significant Wetlands & Coldwater Streams 10-17 Map 10-7: Tier 3 Focus Area – Land Use Change .......................................................... 10-18 LIST OF TABLES Table 9-1: Long Point Region Watershed Area Subwatersheds ......................................... 9-3 Table 9-2: Average Annual Water Budget (Surface Water) ................................................. 9-5 Table 9-3: Surface Water Budget (mm) ............................................................................... 9-5 Table 9-4: Surface Water Budget (m3/s) .............................................................................. 9-6 Table 9-5: Average Annual Water Budget Summary (Groundwater) .................................. 9-7 Table 9-6: Groundwater Water Budget (mm/yr) .................................................................. 9-7 Table 9-7: Groundwater Water Budget (m3/s ) .................................................................... 9-8 Table 9-8: Integrated Water Budget (mm/year) (AquaResource, 2009a,b) ....................... 9-10 Table 9-9: Integrated Water Budget (m3/s) (AquaResource, 2009a,b) .............................. 9-11 Table 9-10: Summary of Water Budget Components (AquaResource, 2009a,b)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Norfolk County State of the Environment Poster
    Long Point Region Grand River Conservation 20 CON 1 Six Nations IND IAN LI Conservation Authority Authority NE CON 2 C O C K S H U T O T AD L R D O O H A I D D R G H OR W F T A Y Brant County N A 2 CON 3 4 Kelvin BR Bealton H I G H Wilsonville ST W 19 EA AY K 2 COUNTY ROAD R EL CON 1 FOLK O 4 NOR V AD IN Boston C CON 4 O U N T Y LI NE 9 EAST Grand River CON 2 OAD 1 LK COUNTY R NORFO 19 Conservation Authority 1 25 2 C CON 5 O 74 3 C K 4 S H H U 5 I T G T 6 H W R O CON 3 O K 7 AY LD A EL Vanessa 24 D 2 V H 4 8 E 23 I S N RO T I Bill's Corners (Nanticoke) W 19 GH 9 ROAD 22 UNTY 10 K CO W 21 A FOL OR AY D 11 N 2 20 12 4 CON 6 19 Long Point Region 13 18 14 17 15 15 16 E CON 4 S T Conservation Authority W 17 D 19 14 TY ROA COUN 13 18 FOLK NOR T 12 E 19 E T 11 E 20 R V 10 21 IL L 9 CON 7 22 RE O 23 A 8 D 24 D 7 A O 6 R RD 5 FO 4 CONNT 5 3 Teeterville RA State of the Environment B 2 1 M A I N S CON 8 T R E Villa Nova E T H T N H R I O G OAD EAST H SON R W M THOMP AY CON 6 A Waterford I 2 N 4 S T Forestry and Carolinian Canada R E E Legend T H S T O U CON 9 TEETERVILLE RO LPRCA Land THOMPSON Norfolk County has approximately 24 per cent forest cover with CON 7 9 24 ROAD EAST EST MPSON ROAD W more in the western end of Norfolk versus the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Rotary Clubs with 90+ Years of Community Service!
    ROTARY AROUND THE WORLD IS OVER 100 YEARS OLD IN NORFOLK COUNTY ROTARY HAS SERVED THE COMMUNITY ROTARY CLUB OF FOR SIMCOE ROTARY CLUB OF OVER DELHI ROTARY CLUB NORFOLK SUNRISE YEARS90! NORFOLK ROTARACT CLUB 2 A Celebration of Rotary in Norfolk, June 2018 Welcome to the world of Rotary Rotary in Norfolk County Rotary International is a worldwide network of service clubs celebrating in Norfolk more than 100 years of global community service with a convention in Toronto at the end of June. Among the thousands of attendees will be PUBLISHED BY representatives from Norfolk County’s three clubs, as well as an affiliated Rotary Club of Simcoe, Rotary Club of Delhi, Rotary Club of Norfolk Sunrise and Rotaract Club in Norfolk Rotaract Club. ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER Rotary has had a presence in Norfolk County for more than 90 years. Media Pro Publishing Over that time, countless thousands of dollars have been donated to both David Douglas PO Box 367, Waterford, ON N0E 1Y0 community and worldwide humanitarian projects. 519-429-0847 • email: [email protected] The motto of Rotary is “Service Above Self” and local Rotarians have Published June 2018 amply fulfilled that mandate. Copywright Rotary Clubs of Norfolk County, Ontario, Canada This special publication is designed to remind the community of Rotary’s local history and its contributions from its beginning in 1925 to the present. Rotary has left its mark locally with ongoing support of projects and services such as Norfolk General Hospital, the Delhi Community Medical Centre and the Rotary Trail. Equally important are youth services and programs highlighted by international travel opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Fish Community and Fisheries in Eastern Lake Erie Results from the 2000-2004 East Basin Rehabilitation Plan
    Status of the Fish Community and Fisheries in Eastern Lake Erie Results from the 2000-2004 East Basin Rehabilitation Plan Lake Erie Management Unit State of the Resource Report March, 2006 Table of Contents Forward.......................................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures.................................................................................................................................iv List of Tables..................................................................................................................................ix List of Appendices...........................................................................................................................x 1.0 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................1 1.1 The Five Year Plan for Rehabilitation of Eastern Lake Erie Fisheries .............................1 1.2 Ecology of Eastern Lake Erie ............................................................................................4 1.3 Management of Eastern Basin Fisheries............................................................................7 Quota Management............................................................................................................7 Smelt Harvest Management...............................................................................................8 Walleye Harvest Restrictions
    [Show full text]
  • Stage 2-3 Archaeological Assessments Report(PDF)
    Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Ministère du Tourisme, de la Culture et du Sport Sport Culture Programs Unit Unité des programmes culturels Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture 435 S. James Street, Suite 334 435, rue James sud, bureau 334 Thunder Bay ON P7E 6S7 Thunder Bay ON P7E 6S7 Tel.: 807-475-1628 Tél.: 807-475-1628 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] February 1, 2013 Dr. Dean Knight Archaeological Research Associates Ltd. 154 Otonabee Drive Kitchener, ON N2C 1L7 Dear Dr. Knight, RE: Review and Entry into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports: Archaeological Assessment Report Entitled Stage 2 and 3 Archaeological Assessments Port Ryerse Wind Power Project (FIT F-001579-WIN-130-601) Part of Lots 3–5, Broken Front Geographic Township of Woodhouse Norfolk County, Ontario, Revised Report Dated January 14, 2013, Filed by MTCS Toronto Office January 16, 2013, MTCS Project Information Form Number P089-014-2012 & P089- 018-2012, MTCS File Number HD00097 This office has reviewed the above-mentioned report, which has been submitted to this ministry as a condition of licensing in accordance with Part VI of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c 0.18.1 This review has been carried out in order to determine whether the licensed professional consultant archaeologist has met the terms and conditions of their licence, that the licensee assessed the property and documented archaeological resources using a process that accords with the 2011 Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists set by the ministry, and that the archaeological fieldwork and report recommendations are consistent with the conservation, protection and preservation of the cultural heritage of Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Canadian Watersheds in the Lake Erie Basin
    Characterization of Canadian watersheds in the Lake Erie basin Canada-Ontario Agreement on Great Lakes Water Quality and Ecosystem Health, 2014 (COA) Nutrient Annex Committee Science Subcommittee February 14, 2017 Background The COA Nutrient Annex Committee (NAC) is responsible for implementing COA Annex 1 - Nutrients including developing the Canada-Ontario Action Plan for Lake Erie that will outline how we will work collaboratively with our partners to meet phosphorus load reduction targets and reduce algal blooms in Lake Erie. Science Subcommittee • Subcommittee under COA NAC was directed to compile and assess existing data and information to characterize geographic areas within the Canadian side of the Lake Erie basin • Includes staff from 5 federal and provincial agencies 2 Background COA NAC Science Subcommittee: • Pamela Joosse, Natalie Feisthauer – Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) • Jody McKenna, Brad Bass – Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) • Mary Thorburn, Ted Briggs, Pradeep Goel, Matt Uza, Cheriene Vieira – Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Changes (MOECC) • Dorienne Cushman – Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA) • Jenn Richards, Tom MacDougall – Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) 3 How to characterize the Lake Erie Basin? Land Use in the Lake Erie Basin (2010) Lake Erie Basin Characterization Quaternary watersheds in the Canadian Lake Erie basin were characterized according to the Canadian basin-wide distribution of distinguishing land cover/activities
    [Show full text]
  • Long Point Region Watershed Characterization Report
    January 2008 Long Point Region Characterization – Executive Summary Page 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction. 3 ■ The Clean Water Act ■ Documents ■ A note to readers 2. Watershed overview . 4 ■ Watershed description ■ Population ■ River quality ■ Uses of the watercourses ■ Drinking water sources 3. Lake Erie Source Protection Region . 6 4. Geology and groundwater . 8 ■ Bedrock geology ■ Surface (quaternary) geology ■ Areas susceptible to groundwater contamination 5. Hydrology and surface water . 12 ■ Overview ■ Watersheds ■ Major groundwater recharge areas ■ Major groundwater discharge areas 6. Reservoirs and reservoir operations . 15 7. Population . 16 ■ Population trends and projections 8. Land cover and land use . 17 ■ Settlement history ■ Municipal structure ■ Urban areas ■ Agriculture: crops and pasture ■ Commerce and industry ■ Forest and vegetation ■ Mining, aggregate and petroleum resources ■ Wetlands 9. Water use. 21 ■ Overview ■ Municipal use and sources ■ Rural domestic ■ Agriculture ■ Industrial ■ Commercial 10. Waste treatment and disposal . 25 ■ Sewage treatment ■ Landfills 11. Water quality . 26 ■ Surface water monitoring ■ Surface water conditions and trends ■ Groundwater quality monitoring ■ Groundwater quality conditions and trends 12. Drinking water issues . 30 ■ Potential groundwater quality issues ■ Potential surface water issues 13. Glossary . 32 Kettle Creek Catfish Creek Long Point Region Grand River Conservation Authority Conservation Authority Conservation Authority Conservation Authority This report is made
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario's Stream Rehabilitation Manual
    Ontario’s Stream Rehabilitation Manual Written by Mark G. Heaton Rick Grillmayer And Jack G. Imhof Illustrations By Roy DeGuisti Copyright by Ontario Streams 17266 Old Main Street, Belfountain, Ontario L0N 1B0 May 2002 All Rights Reserved. Chapter 1 Introduction The Created Need Restoration, Rehabilitation or Reclamation Building on Experience Partnerships Mean Ownership Chapter 2 Perspectives What is a Watershed? Life in a Dynamic Physical Environment ….. Eco ~ System Stream Corridors The Natural Tendency of Rivers (written by Jack G. Imhof) Chapter 3 Look Before You Leap Project Planning Basics STEP 1: Focus STEP 2: Research and Reconnaissance STEP 3: Evaluation and Impact Assessment STEP 4: Goal, Objectives and Targets Chapter 4 Charting the Course to Action! STEP 5: Plan, Prepare and Consult STEP 6: Implement STEP 7: Monitor and Report Chapter 5 Learning From The Past Gathering The Information Drawing Conclusions... Chapter 6 Techniques Introduction Barrier Management Barrier Modification Fishways Soil Bioengineering (written by R. Grillmayer) Live Staking Fascines Brushlayers Brushmattress Live Cribwall Willow Posts Native Material Revetment Live Rock Revetment Habitat Improvement L.U.N.K.E.R.S. Boulder Placement Half Log Cover Instream Log Cover The Sweeper Palette Cover Cabled Log Jam Channel Rehabilitation Natural Channel Reconstruction (Under Construction) Riparian Corridor Rehabilitation (Under Construction) Woody Debris Management Low Stage Weirs (Under Construction) Wing Deflectors Bibliography Bibliography Appendices Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study on the Simcoe Adult Community Centre, Talbot Gardens Arena and the Simcoe Recreation Centre
    Norfolk County Feasibility Study on the Simcoe Adult Community Centre, Talbot Gardens Arena and the Simcoe Recreation Centre. Version 5.0 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1-1 2 RECREATION FACILITIES PROFILE ..................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 TALBOT GARDENS .................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Overview ................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Building Condition ..................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.3 Ice Time Utilization .................................................................................................... 2-2 2.1.4 Current Community Use ............................................................................................ 2-4 2.1.5 Financial Operating Profile ........................................................................................ 2-4 2.1.6 Conclusion................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.2 SIMCOE RECREATION CENTRE .................................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Everything Matters
    Everything Matters Norfolk General Hospital The Norfolk Hospital Nursing Home 2008/2009 Annual Reports to The Community Norfolk General Hospital Foundation At the most unexpected moment you may fi nd you need to place your health or your life in the hands of others. Or hard decisions that aff ect the ones you love may rest in your hands. At those times, you need to trust in the skill and experience of others and... J. William C. Lewis at those times “everything matters.” President and C.E.O. A Message from the President and C.E.O. Through this Report we hope to give you a in the hospital. These are typically patients General Hospital and at The Norfolk Hospital glimpse into this past year and what matters who would be transferred out of the hospital Nursing Home. We are proud of the level of skill at Norfolk General Hospital. This is our way of if there was a place available for them in a and commitment of our entire team. nursing home or hospice, etc. These people being accountable to the community about In fact others are also recognizing our team’s need what is called “alternate level of care” what is happening at the hospital and what it skill level. NGH is now a designated teaching site or ALC. Many of these people wait in the means to you. for providing Emergency Department rotations hospital, sometimes for months, because You may already be aware that by far for medical students from McMaster University. there is no other place for them to go.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Point Region Conservation Authority Annual General Meeting Agenda
    LONG POINT REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY Annual General Meeting Friday, March 5, 2021, 1:30 PM Zoom Virtual Meeting The meeting will be conducted via a video conference Members of the public may view the livestream at the following link: https://bit.ly/lprcayoutube 1. Welcome and Call to Order – Michael Columbus, Chair Agenda Page 2. Declaration of Conflicts of Interest 3. Additional Agenda Items 4. Minutes of the Previous Meeting: a) Board of Directors Meeting of February 3, 2021 Pg 1-5 5. Business Arising from Previous Minutes 6. Chair’s Remarks for 2020 (M. Columbus) 7. Audit & Finance Committee (D. Beres) a) Draft Minutes of February 19, 2021 Pg 6-9 b) 2020 Audited Financial Statements Pg 10-33 c) Audit Findings Report Pg 34-38 d) Approval of Auditors for 2021 8. Notice of Formal Motions (M. Columbus) Pg 39 a) Designate LPRCA Signing Officers b) Borrowing Resolution c) Designate Conservation Ontario Council Representatives d) Lee Brown Marsh Management Committee Member Remuneration Resolution 9. 2020 Committee Reports: a) 2020 Annual Report (J. Maxwell) Pg 40-59 10. Stewardship Award Presentation to Mr. Mike O’Dwyer (M. Columbus) 11. Roger Geysens Service Recognition (M. Columbus) 12. Service Awards Presentation (J. Maxwell) 13. Development Applications: a) Staff-approved applications (B. Hodi) Pg 60-64 b) New Applications (B. Hodi) Pg 65-67 14. New Business: a) Ecological Survey for Selected LPRCA Properties (J. Maxwell) Pg 68-69 b) Timber Tender LP-336-21 Harris-Floyd – Block 2 (J. Maxwell) Pg 70-71 c) Vehicle Tender (A. LeDuc) Pg 72-73 d) 2021 Spring Restoration Tender (B.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake-Erie-Lamp-2008.Pdf
    L a k e E r i e L a M P ( u p d a t e d A p r i l 2 0 0 8 ) Acknowledgements The Lake Erie Lakewide Management Plan (LaMP) Work Group, under the direction of the Lake Erie LaMP Management Committee, prepared the Lake Erie LaMP 2008 Report. Environment Canada and the U.S.EPA are the federal co-leads for the Lake Erie LaMP. Members of the Work Group, Management Committee and others contributed to the content of this report. The Work Group would like to specifically thank the following people for their written contributions to the report: Environment Canada – Luca Cargnelli, Joan Klaassen, Jennifer Vincent • FOCALerie – Matthew Child, Karen Maaskant, Betsy Wilcox • Michigan Department of Environmental Quality – Rick Hobrla • New York Department of Environmental Conservation – Robert Townsend • Ohio Department of Natural Resources – Jeff Tyson • Ohio Environmental Protection Agency – Cherie Blair, Ted Conlin, Natalie Farber, Julie Letterhos, Kelvin Rogers • Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources – Rich Drouin, Jennifer Esberg • Ontario Ministry of the Environment – Ted Briggs, Mary Ellen Scanlon • Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection – Lori Boughton, Jim Grazio • University of Toledo – Thomas Bridgeman • University of Windsor – Jan Ciborowski • U.S. EPA – Rose Ellison, Dan O’Riordan • U.S. Geological Survey – Mike Bur, Dan Button i Thank you to the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority for providing support on formatting and printing, and for showing utmost patience in dealing with last minute changes. Finally, the Work Group and Management Committee would like to thank Jennifer Vincent, Environment Canada and Julie Letterhos, Ohio EPA who served as co-editors of the 2008 Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Situational Analysis Norfolk County Parks, Facilities and Recreation Master Plan
    June, 2015 SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS NORFOLK COUNTY PARKS, FACILITIES AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN Submitted by: Cover Page Image Source: www.flickr.com 509-318 Homer St Vancouver BC Canada V6B 2V2 | p: 604.899.3806 | f: 604.899.3805 51 Wolseley Street Toronto ON Canada M5T 1A4| p: 416.645.7033 | f: 416 645 7046 [email protected] | www.elac.ca E. Lees & Associates Consulting Ltd. June, 2015 The Corporation of Norfolk County County Administration Building 50 Colbourne Street, South Simcoe, Ontario N3Y 4H3 Attention: Frank Sams, Manager, Parks Facilities and Recreation Dear Mr. Sams, Re: Final Situational Analysis – Norfolk County Parks, Facilities and Recreation Master Plan and Feasibility Study LEES+Associates in partnership with F.J. Galloway Associates Inc. and Nicholson Sheffield Architects Inc., is pleased to submit the final Situational Analysis for the Norfolk County Parks, Facilities and Recreation Master Plan and Feasibility Study. We have incorporated a wide range of background information, trends and best practices, empirical observations, and input through multiple consultation methods to develop this final analysis. It represents a distillation of these inputs into a document that has also set the stage for developing a community-driven vision and principles to guide future parks and recreation decision making in the County. We are pleased to submit the final Situational Analysis, along with the Final Master Plan and Feasibility Study. Yours Truly, Erik Lees, BLA, CSLA, MCIP, RPP LEES+Associates Contact Information: 509-318 Homer St, Vancouver BC Canada, V6B 2V2 | p: 604.899.3806 | f: 604.899.3805 51 Wolseley Street, Toronto ON Canada, M5T 1A4 | p: 416.645.7033 | f: 416.645.7046 [email protected] | www.elac.ca Norfolk County – Situational Analysis LEES+Associates - i - Norfolk County – Situational Analysis CONTENTS SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]