DOCSLIB.ORG

Recycling Nitrogen and Sulfur in Grass-Clover Pastures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recycling Nitrogen and Sulfur in Grass-Clover Pastures Recycling Nitrogen and Sulfur in Grass-Clover Pastures 4.tj AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY CORVALLIS STATION BULLETIN 610 JUNE 1972 Contents Abstract 3 Introduction 3 The Nitrogen Cycle 3 The Sulfur Cycle 8 Summary 11 LiteratureCited 12 AUTHORS: M. D. Dawson is a professor of soils science and W. S. McGuire is a professor of agronomy, Oregon State University. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: The authors are indebted to Viroch Impithuksa for conducting the carbon-nitrogen-phosphorus-sulfur (C:N:P:S) analyses and to J. L. Young for invaluable assistance in writing the manuscript. Recycling Nitrogen and Sulfur in Grass-Clover Pastures M. D. DAWSOTJ and W. S. McGuii Abstract Indeed, the soil-plant-animal chain is a fascinating intra-system where the Improved grass-clover pastures uti-nitrogen and sulfur cycles have practi- lized under high stockingsystems cal significance. epitomize conservation management at The management practicescom- its best. Under intensive grazing andpared are (1) unimproved, indigenous in spite of nitrogen (N) or sulfur (S) grasses, (2) fertilized grass-clover cut losses through leaching, volatilization, for hay, and (3) fertilized grass-clover or sales of meat and wool from the intensively grazed. The purpose of this farm, good management permits sym- bulletin is to review certain features bioticfixationofnitrogen and re-of soil-plant-animal interrelationships cycling of N and S in amounts needed as they influence soil nitrogen and sul- for top production. In the comparisons fur cycles under different management of management practicesinvolvingpractices in grass-clover pastures. unimproved indigenous grasses with (1) fertilized grass-clover cut for hay and (2) fertilized grass-clover inten- The Nitrogen Cycle sivelygrazed,thisbulletin reviews In western Oregon, annual yields of certainfeaturesof soil-plant-animal6,000 pounds and 12,000 pounds of interrelationships as they influence soildry matter per acre are common on nitrogen and sulfur cycles. subterraneancloverandirrigated grass-whiteclover pastures,respec- tively. The 6,000 pounds of dry matter Introduction from healthy subterranean clover pas- Many acres of western Oregon landture should contain about 3 percent not ideally suited to cultivation cannitrogen. At least 180 pounds nitrogen produce much meat and wool by wayper acre would be needed to produce of intensively grazed pastures. High this 6,000 pounds of dry matter. Twice stocking rates on these improved grass-this amount of nitrogen would be clover pastures are a means by whichneeded to produce the 12,000 pounds man can economically provide goodof dry matter on irrigated grass-white quality, high protein livestock feed.clover pasture. But quality forage requires consider- The average total soil nitrogen con- able nitrogen, phosphorous, and sulfate tent under normal pastures (Table 1) in balance. Few crops have a higher demand for these nutrients than aTable 1.Average percentage total soil vigorously growing grass-clover pas- nutrients' ture. Percent It is of considerable economic and Nutrient environmental interest to examine the Total nitrogen 0.24 cyclical changes of the comparativelyTotal sulfur 0.02 mobile nutrientsnitrogen and sulfurTotal organic phosphorus 0.03 under variously managed pastures. 'From 12 Oregon grass-clover pastures. 3 N RETAINED BY STOCK VOLATILE STOCK GRAZED N A GRASS CLOVER mdrgromd SYMBIOTIC N FOCER URINE flnsference / ATMOSPHERE N / N NITRATE DEN1TRIFIED AND NITRATE LEACHED \I N FROM PLrr ROOTS SOIL ORGANIC N Figure 1.The nitrogen cycle on grazed grass-clover pasture. Adapted from T. W. Walker (12). is low, about 0.20 percent. In an acrein nodulated roots of the clover plants. furrow s]ice of soil (2 x 106 lbs.) that Numerousworkershavetriedto would amount to 4,000 pounds ofmeasure the amounts of nitrogen fixed nitrogen, but most of this is bound in by clovers annually. Estimated net ad- thesoilin complex organic forms.ditions vary from nil (where the hay Grasses and clover obtain some of thisis removed) to 10 pounds nitrogen per soil-bound nitrogen as nitrate or am-acre (where the legume is sparse) to monium after the decay and minerali- 100 up to more than 400 pounds nitro- zation of soil organic matter. However, gen per acre (where effective legume there is evidence that only about 1.25is plentiful). The amount depends on percent (11)1 of the total soil nitrogen such factors as species of legume, a complex ingrass-clover pasturesis proven effective rhizobia strain, and a mineralized to plant-available forms host of environmental conditions (10). annually. This would mean at best 50 The amount of nitrogen fixed and pounds of nitrogen could be min-available, either for companion grass eralized from 4,000 pounds in an acreby undergroundtransferencefrom furrow slice annually, or a total deficitclover roots or for the clover plant it- of 130 pounds (180-50) of plant-avail- self, depends on effective nodulation able nitrogen per acre. which is only possible with proven ef- Figure1, adapted from Walker'sfective rhizobium strains(Table 2). nitrogen cycle model (12), shows theThere is evidence that "native" strains nitrate mineralized from decaying soilof rhizobia are in many cases only organic matter is subject to uptake by partially effective in N fixation for the pasture, mainly by the grass com- clovers grown in Oregon. ponent. Also evident is an arrow indi- For subterranean clover, an aver- cating symbioticfixationof atmos-age of 150 pounds nitrogen per acre pheric nitrogen by the rhizobia livingis fixed symbiotically per year. That is more than enough to make up the 'Numbers in parentheses refer to Liter- 130-pound deficit of nitrogen previ- ature Cited, page 12. ously noted, except that, firstly, much 4 Table 2.Effect of inoculation with a othernutrientstoinsure optimum proven rhizobium strain on New Zealand symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Table 4 white c1over data illustrate the effect of applied sul- fur and molybdenum on clover yield Inoculated Uninoculated and reflect the role these nutrients Avg. yield Avg. Avg. yield Avg. have upon thesymbioticnitrogen (dry plant (dry plant fixation efficiency. Such responses have matter) N matter) N been observed frequently in Oregon. lbs/A % lbs/A % Where grasses and clovers are growing 11,574 3.17 7,903 2.18 together, grasses utilize almost all the mineral N available (11). Recent research showsthatsoil of this fixed nitrogen is not immedi-moisture stress may be as much a ately available to the companion grasslimiting factor on the ability of clover and, secondly,soil conditions often to symbiotically fix atmospheric nitro- preclude the clover's ability to fix nitro- gen as are deficiencies in plant nu- gen efficiently. Ineffectively nodulatedtrients. Kuo (6) found that nitrogen plants, due often to poor sowing tech-fixation by a legume is reduced as the riiques, produce clover which is lowsoil dries out (Table 5). Together with in plant nitrogen (Table 3). Data inleaching losses of nitrates during win- Table 3indicatethat conventional ter and volatile losses of nitrogen from inoculation was often ineffective. Tothe soil, such less-than-optimum condi- insure effective nodulation with thetions for nitrogen fixation increase the applied strain,it was necessary to practical difficulties of obtaining suffi- plant seeds with a lime-superphos-cient nitrogen for the yield of 6,000 plite mixture. pounds dry matter per acre in a grass- Once established, a legume must beclover pasture. supplied with adequate phosphorus, An ideal way to restore balance to sulfur,molybdenum,andpossibly the nitrogen cycle (Figure 1) is to use Table 3.Percent effective nodulatjoof subclover and plant nitrogen content Percent effective nodulation four weeks after planting Average Washington plant Treatment Polk Co. Co. Coos Co. nitrogen (4 Uni noculated 14 2 3 1.29 Inoculated 14 2 44 Inoculat d and ''line- super mix' 72 96 79 3.54 Equal ,uixture of 20 percent superphosphate and lime. Table 4.Mean subterranean clover yields and nitrogen content as influenced by applied sulfur and molybdenum Total Clover plant Treatment Diy matter nitrogen nitrogen lbs/A lbs/A J) 3,420 2.06 70 PS 5,220 2.78 145 PSMo 5,982 3.17 190 5 Table 5.Rates of nitrogen fixation in a legume as influenced by moisture stress at 50 degrees F' Soil water stress Nitrogen fixaon (bars) Soil status ( mg of N per day) 0.35 Field capacity 0.76 1.50 Moist 0.30 2.50 Moderately dr 0.23 'From unpublished M.S. thesis by T. Kuo (6). Table 6.Nitrogen uptake from grass and grass-plus-clover pastures' Grass-clover pasture Management Grass alone Grass N Clover N Total lbs/A lbs/A lbs/A lbs/A Hay crop taken 50 188 346 534 Grazed 75 379 271 650 J. Melville and P. D. Sears, (7). the grazing animal. The data in Tableapparent when ryegrass was grown 6 (taken from New Zealand) illustrate in a field fertilized with superphos- the role of the grazing animal in thephate (300 lbs.of 20% superphos- nitrogen cycle. Where a hay crop isphate applied annually) that had been taken,underground transferenceof intensively grazed (4 sheep per acre) nitrogenfrom cloverhas providedfor the past 12 years. Furthermore, grass in association with clover withthe yield and nitrogen content of rye- 138 pounds more nitrogen per acregrass on thissoil were significantly than an all-grass pasture. This was a higher than of ryegrass grown on the small effect compared with the grazedsame soil which had virtually no graz- grass-clover pasture, where the grass ing during this period. The accumu- uptake of nitrogen amounted to 379lated soil organic nitrogen on the in- pounds per acre. tensively grazed grass-clover pasture A greater proportion of the nitrogen apparently is mineralized and cycled originally fixed by clover appears in at a rate sufficient to provide optimum the grass where urine is returned andnitrogen nutrition for the grass. Under serves as a nitrogen fertilizer. Indeed, such conditions,the nitrogencycle at a stocking rate of three or four ewes appears balanced in such a way that per acre, dung and urine excreta would moisture and sufficient solar energy likely return an equivalent of at least alone drive the system near optimum.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Human Alteration of the Global Nitrogen Cycle
    What is Nitrogen? Human Alteration of the Nitrogen is the most abundant element in Global Nitrogen Cycle the Earth’s atmosphere. Nitrogen makes up 78% of the troposphere. Nitrogen cannot be absorbed directly by the plants and animals until it is converted into compounds they can use. This process is called the Nitrogen Cycle. Heather McGraw, Mandy Williams, Suzanne Heinzel, and Cristen Whorl, Give SIUE Permission to Put Our Presentation on E-reserve at Lovejoy Library. The Nitrogen Cycle How does the nitrogen cycle work? Step 1- Nitrogen Fixation- Special bacteria convert the nitrogen gas (N2 ) to ammonia (NH3) which the plants can use. Step 2- Nitrification- Nitrification is the process which converts the ammonia into nitrite ions which the plants can take in as nutrients. Step 3- Ammonification- After all of the living organisms have used the nitrogen, decomposer bacteria convert the nitrogen-rich waste compounds into simpler ones. Step 4- Denitrification- Denitrification is the final step in which other bacteria convert the simple nitrogen compounds back into nitrogen gas (N2 ), which is then released back into the atmosphere to begin the cycle again. How does human intervention affect the nitrogen cycle? Nitric Oxide (NO) is released into the atmosphere when any type of fuel is burned. This includes byproducts of internal combustion engines. Production and Use of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) is released into the atmosphere through Nitrogen Fertilizers bacteria in livestock waste and commercial fertilizers applied to the soil. Removing nitrogen from the Earth’s crust and soil when we mine nitrogen-rich mineral deposits. Discharge of municipal sewage adds nitrogen compounds to aquatic ecosystems which disrupts the ecosystem and kills fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Nitrogen Metabolism in Phytoplankton - Y
    MARINE ECOLOGY – Nitrogen Metabolism in Phytoplankton - Y. Collos, J. A. Berges NITROGEN METABOLISM IN PHYTOPLANKTON Y. Collos Laboratoire d'Hydrobiologie CNRS, Université Montpellier II, France J. A. Berges School of Biology and Biochemistry, Queen's University of Belfast, UK Keywords: uptake, reduction, excretion, proteases, chlorophyllases, cell death. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Availability and use of different forms of nitrogen 2.1 Nitrate 2.2. Nitrite 2.3. Ammonium 2.4. Molecular N2 2.5. Dissolved organic N (DON) 2.6. Particulate nitrogen (PN) 3. Assimilation pathways 4. Accumulation and storage 4.1. Inorganic compounds 4.2. Organic compounds 5. Nutrient classification and preferences 6. Plasticity in cell composition 7. Overflow mechanisms: excretion and release processes 8. Recycling of N within the cell 9. Degradation pathways 9.1. Requirements for and roles of degradation 9.2. How is degradation accomplished? 9.3. Variation in degradation 9.4. Pathogenesis and Cell Death 10. From uptake to growth: time-lag phenomena 11. Relationships with carbon metabolism 12. Future directions AcknowledgementsUNESCO – EOLSS Glossary Bibliography SAMPLE CHAPTERS Biographical Sketches Summary Phytoplankton use a large variety of nitrogen compounds and are extremely well adapted to fluctuating environmental conditions by a high capacity to change their chemical composition.Degradation and turnover of nitrogen within phytoplankton is essential for many processes including normal cell maintenance, acclimations to changes in light, salinity, and nutrients, and cell defence against pathogens. The ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) MARINE ECOLOGY – Nitrogen Metabolism in Phytoplankton - Y. Collos, J. A. Berges pathways by which N degradation is accomplished are very poorly understood, but based on work in higher plant species, protein degradation is likely to be of central importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Alteration of the Global Nitrogen Cycle: Causes And
    Published by the Ecological Society of America Number 1, Spring 1997 Causes andConsequences Human Alterationofthe Issues in EcologyGlobal NitrogenCycle: Photo by Nadine Cavender Issues in Ecology Number 1 Spring 1997 Human Alteration of the Global Nitrogen Cycle: Causes and Consequences SUMMARY Human activities are greatly increasing the amount of nitrogen cycling between the living world and the soil, water, and atmosphere. In fact, humans have already doubled the rate of nitrogen entering the land-based nitrogen cycle, and that rate is continuing to climb. This human-driven global change is having serious impacts on ecosystems around the world because nitrogen is essential to living organisms and its availability plays a crucial role in the organization and functioning of the worlds ecosystems. In many ecosystems on land and sea, the supply of nitrogen is a key factor controlling the nature and diversity of plant life, the population dynamics of both grazing animals and their predators, and vital ecologi- cal processes such as plant productivity and the cycling of carbon and soil minerals. This is true not only in wild or unmanaged systems but in most croplands and forestry plantations as well. Excessive nitrogen additions can pollute ecosystems and alter both their ecological functioning and the living communities they support. Most of the human activities responsible for the increase in global nitrogen are local in scale, from the production and use of nitrogen fertilizers to the burning of fossil fuels in automobiles, power generation plants, and industries. However, human activities have not only increased the supply but enhanced the global movement of various forms of nitrogen through air and water.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing the Natural Sulfur Cycle to Slow Global Warming$
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Atmospheric Environment 41 (2007) 7373–7375 www.elsevier.com/locate/atmosenv New Directions: Enhancing the natural sulfur cycle to slow global warming$ Full scale ocean iron fertilization of the Southern The CLAW hypothesis further states that greater Ocean (SO) has been proposed previously as a DMS production would result in additional flux to means to help mitigate rising CO2 in the atmosphere the atmosphere, more cloud condensation nuclei (Martin et al., 1990, Nature 345, 156–158). Here we (CCN) and greater cloud reflectivity by decreasing describe a different, more leveraged approach to cloud droplet size. Thus, increased DMS would partially regulate climate using limited iron en- contribute to the homeostasis of the planet by hancement to stimulate the natural sulfur cycle, countering warming from increasing CO2. A cor- resulting in increased cloud reflectivity that could ollary to the CLAW hypothesis is that elevated CO2 cool large regions of our planet. Some regions of the itself increases DMS production which has been Earth’s oceans are high in nutrients but low in observed during a mesocosm scale CO2 enrichment primary productivity. The largest such region is the experiment (Wingenter et al., 2007, Geophysical SO followed by the equatorial Pacific. Several Research Letters 34, L05710). The CLAW hypoth- mesoscale (102 km2) experiments have shown that esis relies on the assumption that DMS sea-to-air the limiting nutrient to productivity is iron. Yet, the flux leads to new particles and not just the growth of effectiveness of iron fertilization for sequestering existing particles. If the CLAW hypothesis is significant amounts of atmospheric CO2 is still in correct, the danger is that enormous anthropogenic question.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon–Nitrogen Interactions in Idealized Simulations with JSBACH (Version 3.10)
    Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2009–2030, 2017 www.geosci-model-dev.net/10/2009/2017/ doi:10.5194/gmd-10-2009-2017 © Author(s) 2017. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Carbon–nitrogen interactions in idealized simulations with JSBACH (version 3.10) Daniel S. Goll1,a, Alexander J. Winkler2,3, Thomas Raddatz2, Ning Dong3,5, Ian Colin Prentice4,6, Philippe Ciais1, and Victor Brovkin2 1Le Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, IPSL-LSCE CEA/CNRS/UVSQ Saclay, Gif sur Yvette, France 2Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany 3International Max Planck Research School on Earth System Modeling, Hamburg, Germany 4Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia 5Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia 6AXA Chair in Biosphere and Climate Impacts, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Buckhurst Road, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK aformerly at: Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany Correspondence to: Daniel S. Goll ([email protected]) Received: 17 December 2016 – Discussion started: 9 January 2017 Revised: 7 April 2017 – Accepted: 14 April 2017 – Published: 22 May 2017 Abstract. Recent advances in the representation of soil car- The strengths of the land carbon feedbacks of the re- −1 bon decomposition and carbon–nitrogen interactions imple- cent version of JSBACH, with βL D 0:61 Pgppm and γL D mented previously into separate versions of the land sur- −27:5 Pg ◦C−1, are 34 and 53 % less than the averages of face scheme JSBACH are here combined in a single version, CMIP5 models, although the CMIP5 version of JSBACH which is set to be used in the upcoming 6th phase of coupled simulated βL and γL, which are 59 and 42 % higher than model intercomparison project (CMIP6).
    [Show full text]
  • 1-3: Biogeochemical Cycles and Ecosystem Homeostasis
    1-3: Biogeochemical cycles and Ecosystem homeostasis:……….…………………Week 4 For a full understanding of ecosystem functions , we need some knowledge of the quantitative and energetic pathways within an ecosystem . A brief consideration of the cyclic passage of the key elements ( such as carbon , hydrogen , oxygen , nitrogen , phosphorus, and sulfur ) between the living and nonliving components of the ecosystem , is a logical starting point toward this understanding . Carbon cycle : Carbon is a key element in all organic material . Carbon exists in the atmosphere as carbon dioxide , which is the form required in the photosynthesis ( Fig .4 ) . From plants , organic carbon may go into animals , and from either plants or animals it may re-enter the atmosphere as CO2 through respiration and decomposition . Carbon tied up in hard parts of some animals , such as shells , will remain for a long time as marine deposits of animal inorganic carbonates . Limestone can result from marine deposits of animal inorganic carbonates as well as from inorganic precipitation of carbonates in water . These carbonates in limestone can then return to the carbon cycle only very slowly through a process of erosion and dissolution . Carbon may also in the form of organic deposits in coal and petroleum until released in burning . Fig . 4 : Carbon cycle - 9 - Nitrogen cycle : Nitrogen is an essential element of all protoplasm , particularly proteins . The atmospheric form of the free nitrogen must be fixed to NH3 or NO3 which can be utilized by plants(Fig.5). Nitrogen fixation is accomplished by bacterial action of both free – living soil bacteria such as Azotobacter and Clostridium and symbiotic bacteria such as Rhizobium living in root nodules of leguminous plants .
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeochemistry of Wetlands Nitrogen
    Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) Biogeochemistry of Wetlands SiScience an dAd App litilications NITROGEN Wetland Biogeochemistry Laboratory Soil and Water Science Department University of Florida Instructor : Patrick Inglett [email protected] 6/22/20086/22/2008 P.W.WBL Inglett1 1 Nitrogen Introduction N Forms, Distribution, Importance Basic processes of N Cycles Examples of current research Examples of applications Key points learned 6/22/2008 P.W. Inglett 2 1 Nitrogen Learning Objectives Identify the forms of N in wetlands Understand the importance of N in wetlands/global processes Define the major N processes/transformations Understand the importance of microbial activity in N transformations Understand the potential regulators of N processes See the application of N cycle principles to understanding natural and man-made ecosystems 6/22/2008 P.W. Inglett 3 Nitrogen Cycling Plant biomass N N2 NH3 N2 N2O (g) Litterfall Nitrogen Fixation Volatilization Mineralization. Water - Nitrification + + NO3 NH4 Organic N NH4 Column AEROBIC - Plant Peat NO3 + + [NH4 ]s uptake accretion [NH4 ]s Denitrification ANAEROBIC Microbial + Organic N Biomass N Adsorbed NH4 N2, N2O (g) 6/22/2008 P.W. Inglett 4 2 Forms of Nitrogen Organic Nitrogen Inorganic Nitrogen + • Proteins • Ammonium (NH4 ) - • Amino Sugars • Nitrate N (NO3 ) - • Nucleic Acids • Nitrite N (NO2 ) • Urea • Nitrous ox ide (N2O) • Dinitrogen (N2) 6/22/2008 P.W. Inglett 5 N Transformations Solid Gaseous Phase: Phase: Particulate N N2 + Bound: NH4 N2O - - NO3 NO2 Aqueous Phase: + NH4 DON - DIN NO3 - Particulate N NO2 6/22/2008 P.W. Inglett 6 3 Reservoirs of Nitrogen Lithosphere 163,600 x 1018 g Atmosphere 3,860 x 1018 g Hydrosphere 23 x 1018 g Biosphere 0.28 x 1018 g 6/22/2008 P.W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carbon Cycle Is Very Important to All Ecosystems, and Ultimately Life on Earth
    What is The Carbon Cycle? The carbon cycle is very important to all ecosystems, and ultimately life on earth. The carbon cycle is critical to the food chain. Living tissue contains carbon, because they contain proteins, fats and carbohydrates. The carbon in these (living or dead) tissues is recycled in various processes. Let's see how this cycle works using the simple sketch below: Human activities like heating homes and cars burning fuels (combustion) give off carbon into the atmosphere. During respiration, animals also introduce carbon into the atmosphere in the form of carbon dioxide. The Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is absorbed by green plants (producers) to make food in photosynthesis. When animals feed on green plants, they pass on carbon compounds unto other animals in the upper levels of their food chains. Animals give off carbon dioxide into the atmosphere during respiration. Carbon dioxide is also given off when plants and animals die. This occurs when decomposers (bacteria and fungi) break down dead plants and animals (decomposition) and release the carbon compounds stored in them. Very often, energy trapped in the dead materials becomes fossil fuels which is used as combustion again at a later time. Nitrogen Cycle: Nitrogen is also key in the existence of ecosystems and food chains. Nitrogen forms about 78% of the air on earth. But plants do not use nitrogen directly from the air. This is because nitrogen itself is unreactive, and cannot be used by green plants to make protein. Nitrogen gas therefore, needs to be converted into nitrate compound in the soil by nitrogen-fixing bacteria in soil, root nodules or lightning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nitrogen Cycle
    The Nitrogen Cycle Almost 80% of our atmosphere is made up of the element nitrogen bonded together as N2. This represents most of the nitrogen available on Earth. Ni- trogen is an important element used by all living things to make proteins, amino acids and the nucleic acids of DNA. Yet its gaseous form, N2, found – + in the atmosphere is not usable. It must be “fixed” into nitrates (NO3 ), ammonium (NH4 ) or urea (NH2)2CO to be taken up by plants. Animals can get their nitrogen by eating those plants and so it moves through the food webs. When nitrogen is fixed, it is absorbed by plants and then eaten by animals, who then expel it in their waste and eventually die and decompose (releas- ing more). The nitrogen is then released into the soil and then back into atmosphere – this is the Nitrogen Cycle. The Nitrogen Cycle can be broken down into 4 processes: Nitrogen fixing – Decay – Nitrification – Dentrification 1. Nitrogen Fixing is when gaseous nitrogen is “fixed” by either lightning (only up to about 8%), bacteria in the soil, or nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the root nodules of leguminous plants (like soy beans). 2. Decay - The nitrogen in plants is eaten by animals and broken down and expelled in the animals’ waste. Microorganisms further break it down into ammonia. 3. Nitrification - Some ammonia is absorbed by plants through their roots, but most is converted by nitrifying bacteria into nitrites and then nitrates. 4. Dentrification moves the nitrogen in the other direction back into the atmosphere. Dentrifying bacteria reduce nitrites and nitrates into nitrogen gas, releasing it back to the atmosphere to complete the cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon-Nitrogen Interactions Regulate Climate-Carbon Cycle Feedbacks: Results from an Atmosphere-Ocean General Circulation Model
    Biogeosciences, 6, 2099–2120, 2009 www.biogeosciences.net/6/2099/2009/ Biogeosciences © Author(s) 2009. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Carbon-nitrogen interactions regulate climate-carbon cycle feedbacks: results from an atmosphere-ocean general circulation model P. E. Thornton1, S. C. Doney2, K. Lindsay3, J. K. Moore4, N. Mahowald5, J. T. Randerson4, I. Fung6, J.-F. Lamarque7,8, J. J. Feddema9, and Y.-H. Lee3 1Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6335, USA 2Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543-1543, USA 3Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307-3000, USA 4Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3100, USA 5Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA 6Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-4767, USA 7NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Chemical Sciences Division, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305-3337, USA 8Atmospheric Chemistry Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307-3000, USA 9Department of Geography, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045-7613, USA Received: 28 January 2009 – Published in Biogeosciences Discuss.: 26 March 2009 Revised: 12 August 2009 – Accepted: 17 September 2009 – Published: 8 October 2009 Abstract. Inclusion of fundamental ecological interactions
    [Show full text]
  • The Carbon Cycle
    TEACHER GUIDE THE CARBON CYCLE MATERIALS PER GROUP: LESSON OVERVIEW: Activity 1 The carbon cycle is the biogeochemical cycle by which carbon is • Carbonated water (clear soda or exchanged among the biosphere, pedosphere, geosphere, hydro- seltzer water) sphere and atmosphere of Earth. Along with the nitrogen cycle • Hot water (50°C) and the water cycle, the carbon cycle comprises a sequence of • Cold water (5°C) events key to making Earth capable of sustaining life; it describes • Two 12 oz. plastic bowls the movement of carbon as it is recycled and reused throughout • Two small (3 oz.) clear plastic cups the biosphere. Activity 2 LESSON OBJECTIVES: • Vinegar Students will be able to: • Baking soda 1. Observe the density of carbon dioxide. • Universal indicator 2. Demonstrate the effect of temperature on the amount of car- • Water bon dioxide that will dissolve in water. • Water and indicator cup 3. Test the effect of carbon dioxide on the pH of water. • Baking soda and vinegar 4. Describe how these properties of carbon dioxide relate to the • Mini spoon carbon cycle. • Universal indicator pH color chart ESSENTIAL QUESTION: Activity 3 How does matter cycle through an ecosystem? • Bubble generator* • Dry ice (8 oz.) TOPICAL ESSENTIAL QUESTION: • 9 oz. plastic cup What is carbon’s role in life on Earth? • Water (enough to fill bubble generator half-full) • Plastic spoon TOTAL DURATION: • Dish soap (5 mL) 15-20 min. pre-lab prep time; 40-50 min. class time • Cotton glove SAFETY PRECAUTIONS: *A bubble generator can be purchased from • Avoid contact of all chemicals with eyes and skin.
    [Show full text]
  • Century: Grand Challenges in the Nitrogen Cycle
    Feeding the World in the 21st Century: Grand Challenges in the Nitrogen Cycle National Science Foundation Arlington, Virginia November 9–10, 2015 PI: Nicolai Lehnert (Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan) Co-organizers: Gloria Coruzzi (Department of Biology, New York University) Eric Hegg (Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University) Lance Seefeldt (Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Utah State University) NSF liaison: Timothy Patten (Division of Chemistry) Co-funded by the Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems Division Funded under NSF Award Number 1550842 The nitrogen (N) cycle is one of the most important biogeochemical cycles on Earth, as nitrogen is an essential nutrient for all known life forms. Natural processes, driven mostly by microbes in association with leguminous plants, fix and deliver around 120 megatons per year of bioavailable nitrogen to the biosphere. Humans have greatly augmented these processes, mostly through the industrial Haber-Bosch process and planting of leguminous crops, contributing at least the same amount. It is estimated that around 40% of the human population depends on the human contribution to the nitrogen cycle. The purpose of this workshop, held November 9–10, 2015 at the National Science Foundation headquarters in Arlington, Virginia, was to identify ways that chemists can contribute to understanding and improving the nitrogen cycle in the context of agriculture and environmental management. Participants noted two major imbalances in the nitrogen cycle: insufficient bioavailable nitrogen in soils in the developing world, and too much inorganic nitrogen in the developed world. Lack of bioavailable nitrogen in the developing world leads to low crop yields and diets with insufficient protein.
    [Show full text]