Apraxia of Speech and Nonverbal School-Aged Children with Autism I
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Topics Apraxia of Speech and Nonverbal School-Aged Children with Autism I. Introduction A. Apraxia of Speech Lawrence D. Shriberg B. The CAS/ASD Hypothesis II. Overviews Waisman Center A. Speech Sound Disorders (SSD) University of Wisconsin-Madison B. Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) III. Speech Research in ASD Nonverbal School-aged Children with Autism A. Verbal ASD: Findings NIH Workshop, Bethesda, MD, April 13-14, 2010 B. Nonverbal ASD: Perspectives Locus of Apraxia of Speech in a Four-Phase Speech Processing Frameworka Apraxia of Speech in an Adolescent with Classic Galactosemia Encoding (auditory-perceptual) Memorial (storage, retrieval) Transcoding (planning-programming) Execution (neuromotor) aAfter Van der Merwe (2009) Multisyllabic Words Task 2 (MWT2) What is Apraxia of Speech? 1. emphasis 11. consciousness 2. probably 12. suspicious Say the following as quickly as you can: 3. sympathize 13. municipal 4. terminal 14. orchestra 5. synthesis 15. specific Six thick thistle sticks 6. especially 16. statistics Six thick thistle sticks 7. peculiar 17. fire extinguisher Six thick thistle sticks 8. skeptical 18. Episcopal church 9. fudgesicle 19. statistician 10. vulnerable 20. Nicaragua 1 Topics The CAS/ASD Hypothesisa I. Introduction CAS is a sufficient cause for: A. Apraxia of Speech B. The CAS/ASD Hypothesis Weak version: speech and prosody- II. Overviews voice deficits in persons with verbal ASD A. Speech Sound Disorders (SSD) B. Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) Strong version: failure to acquire speech in III. Speech Research in ASD persons with nonverbal ASD A. Verbal ASD: Findings aChildhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) is the term adopted in the ASHA (2007) report; Developmental Verbal Dyspraxia (DVD) continues to be B. Nonverbal ASD: Perspectives used in medical literatures and in most other countries Motivation for the Motivation for the CAS/ASD Hypothesis CAS/ASD Hypothesis Persons with ASD reportedly have praxic movement disorders Persons with ASD reportedly have significantly reduced (see elsewhere this workshop), implicating planning/programming early nonverbal oral behaviors presumed to share deficits, the presumed speech processing locus of CAS neural substrates with speech and reported to predict speech fluency (Gernsbacher et al., 2008; Iverson & Speech acquisition and performance researchers argue Wozniak, 2007; Page & Boucher, 1998; Seal & Bonvillion, from a number of perspectives that speech is domain 1997; see elsewhere this workshop) specific (e.g., Kent, 2000, 2004, 2010; McCauley et al., 2009; Potter et al., 2009; Weismer, 2006; Ziegler, 2002, 2008) CAS is the only subtype of speech disorder in which the onset of speech (compared to speech precision or Persons with ASD reportedly have imitative deficits (see stability) is delayed (Shriberg, 2010a; however, see IIA) elsewhere this workshop), with implications for motor processes in speech acquisition CAS and ASD were both implicated in recent genomic findings linking FOXP2 to CNTNAP2 (Poot et al., 2010; Vernes et al., Imitation deficits are not a core speech-processing 2008); CAS and ASD overlaps also reported for other candidate feature of CAS in frameworks such as in the widely genes and regions of interest accepted van der Merwe framework (2009); see also Kappes et al. (2009) and Terband and Maassen (2010) History of Classification Terms for SSD Topics of Known and Idiopathic Origins I. Introduction PHONOLOGY PHONOLOGY PHONOLOGICAL A. Apraxia of Speech AWARENESS MEMORY ARTICULATION ? PHONOLOGY SPEECH B. The CAS/ASD Hypothesis SOUND PHONOLOGICAL ARTICULATION PRODUCTION II. Overviews ARTICULATION A. Speech Sound Disorders (SSD) “PHONOLOGY” “ARTICULATION” “ARTICULATION “ARTICULATION “ARTICULATION- “PHONOLOGY” “SPEECH SOUND” AND OR PHONOLOGY” B. Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) PHONOLOGY” PHONOLOGY” 1920-1970 1970-1980 1980-1990 1990-2004 2005 III. Speech Research in ASD A. Verbal ASD: Findings B. Nonverbal ASD: Perspectives 2 Eight Putative Etiological Subtypes of SSD of Currently Unknown Origin Genomic Research in Speech Delay No. Type Subtype Abbreviation Risk Factors Processes Affected 1 Speech Delay Speech Delay–Genetic SD-GEN Polygenic/ Cognitive-Linguistic Environmental There have been no genes identified to date 2 Speech Delay– SD-OME Polygenic/ Auditory-Perceptual that code specifically for Speech Delay Otitis Media with Effusion Environmental 3 Speech Delay– Developmental SD-DPI Polygenic/ Affective- Psychosocial Involvement Environmental Temperamental Several candidate genes for Speech Delay 4 Motor Speech Motor Speech Disorder– MSD-AOS Monogenic? Speech-Motor Control have been associated with language Disorder Apraxia of Speech Oligogenic? impairment and dyslexia, including 5 Motor Speech Disorder– MSD-DYS Monogenic? Speech-Motor Control Dysarthria Oligogenic? regions of interest reported on 5 of the 6 Motor Speech Disorder- MSD-NOS Monogenic? Speech-Motor Control Not Otherwise Specified Polygenic? Oligogenic? 22 autosomes: 1, 3, 6, 15, 16 Environmental? 7 Speech Errors Speech Errors-Sibilants SE-/s/ Environmental Phonological Attunement 8 Speech Errors-Rhotics SE-/r/ Environmental Phonological Attunement Topics Research in CAS Genomic I. Introduction Phenotype A. Apraxia of Speech Neuroimaging B. The CAS/ASD Hypothesis e.g., Lewis (2008); Robin (2008) II. Overviews Speech Motor Control and Computational A. Speech Sound Disorders (SSD) Neural Modeling; e.g., Maas, Robin, Wright, et al. (2008); B. Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) Terband et al. (2009); Terband and III. Speech Research in ASD Maassen (2010); Wright et al. (2009) A. Verbal ASD: Findings Treatment B. Nonverbal ASD: Perspectives e.g., Maas, Robin, Austermann Hula, et al. (2008) Genomic Research in CAS: Genomic Research in CAS: The Iconic Pedigree Some FOXP2 Highlights Molecular genetic and neurocognitive publications on the London ‘KE’ family beginning with Hurst et al. (1990) catalyzed worldwide interest from many disciplines in the possibility of speech-language genes Lai et al. (2001) identified FOXP2 as the gene segregating in affected members of the family FOXP2 disruptions and motor speech disorder consistent with CAS reported in four other families (MacDermot et al., 2005; Shriberg et al., 2006; Shriberg, 2010b; Zeesman et al., 2006) Continuing functional analyses of FOXP2; knockout, knockdown, and knockin Foxp2 orthologs in vertebrate species including rodents, birds, reptiles, and fish Zebra finch genome sequenced; parrot genome next 3 Genomic Research in CAS: Alternative Neural Circuit Proposals for Foxp2 Expression in Mouse Vocalizationsa Madison Group CAS documented in three siblings with an unbalanced chromosome 4q;16q translocation (Shriberg, Jakielski, & El-Shanti, 2008) Phenotype studies of a mother and son in a new family with a FOXP2 disruption, including possible ASD in the son Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH; copy number) studies of children with idiopathic CAS Resequencing studies of five children with idiopathic CAS; exome analyses covering > 90% of the protein coding subset of the genome aCampbell et al. (2009) Phenotype Research in CAS Phenotype Research in CAS: The Phenotype Constraint “…lack of a definition and an agreed-upon set of criteria for subject selection [is the] single most No biomarker for CAS important impediment to theoretical and clinical advancement in AOS.” No one behavioral marker McNeil (2001) pathognomonic for CAS “…the problem lies not so much in defining the No set of behavioral markers with underlying impairment of AOS as in a lack of clear operational definitions or procedural criteria for the high diagnostic accuracy for CAS differential diagnosis of AOS.” Maassen (2002) Phenotype Research in CAS: CAS Research: Phenotype Constraints in FOXP2 Studies Madison Phenotype Research CAS in Complex CAS as an Adult CAS as a Sequelae of Clinical assessment of affected KE family members not Neurodevelopmental Idiopathic reported to date. The measures identifying affected AOS Neurological Disorder Disorders Disorder 1 from unaffected KE family members were speech services, and performances on non-standardized Foxp2 avian Core Speech Features Pathognomonic and mammal Core Non-Speech Features 2 Signs/Markers nonsense word repetition tasks and oral motor tasks. knock-o/d/i Relevant Age Issues genotypes Relevant Severity Issues 3 Speech data from KE family and from family members in two other FOXP2 families are consistent with Genetic Substrates dysarthria, as well as apraxia of speech (Morgan Neural Substrates et al., 2005; Shriberg, 2010b; Shriberg et al., 2006). 4 Assessment FOXP2 has low attributable risk for CAS. Treatment Prevention 4 Competence, Precision, Complex Neurodevelopmental Disorders Reporting ‘Significant Speech Delay’/CAS Stability Analytics (CPSA)a Autism Competence Chromosome Translocations (Normative; Down syndrome (Trisomy 21) Mastery) Rolandic Epilepsy Fragile X syndrome (FMR1) Joubert syndrome (CEP290; AHI1) Precision Stability Galactosemia (Spatiotemporal (Spatiotemporal Accuracy) Consistency) Rett syndrome (MeCP2) Russell-Silver syndrome (FOXP2) Velocardiofacial syndrome (22q11.2 deletion) aShriberg, Fourakis, et al. (2010) Identifying Markers of CAS in Neurogenetic Contexts Can Inform Markers of Idiopathic CAS Topics I. Introduction Findings to date are interpreted as support for the premise that an operationalized and standardized set A. Apraxia of Speech of perceptual and acoustic markers of CAS can be B. The CAS/ASD Hypothesis identified from and cross