DOCSLIB.ORG

Academic Supercomputing in Europe (Sixth Edition, Fall 2003)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Academic Supercomputing in Europe (Sixth Edition, Fall 2003) Academic Supercomputing in Europe (Sixth edition, fall 2003) Rossend Llurba The Hague/Den Haag, januari 2004 Netherlands National Computing Facilities Foundation Academic Supercomputing in Europe Facilities & Policies - fall 2003 Seventh edition Llurba, R. (Rossend) ISBN 90-70608-37-5 Copyright © 2004 by Stichting Nationale Computerfaciliteiten Postbus 93575, 2509 AN Den Haag, The Netherlands http://www.nwo.nl/ncf All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without permission of the author. Contents PREFACE ..............................................................................................................................................1 1 EUROPEAN PROGRAMMES AND INITIATIVES ................................................................................3 1.1 EUROPEAN UNION...................................................................................................................................................................3 1.2 SUPRANATIONAL CENTRES AND CO-OPERATIONS. ....................................................................................................................5 2 PAN-EUROPEAN RESEARCH NETWORKING ...................................................................................7 2.1 NETWORK ORGANISATIONS......................................................................................................................................................7 2.2 OPERATIONAL NETWORKS.......................................................................................................................................................7 2.3 NETWORKING PROJECTS...........................................................................................................................................................7 3 SUPERCOMPUTING IN THE INDIVIDUAL EUROPEAN COUNTRIES ..................................................9 3.1 ALBANIA .................................................................................................................................................................................9 3.2 ARMENIA.................................................................................................................................................................................9 3.3 AUSTRIA ..................................................................................................................................................................................9 3.4 BELARUS...............................................................................................................................................................................10 3.5 BELGIUM...............................................................................................................................................................................10 3.6 BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA..........................................................................................................................................................10 3.7 BULGARIA .............................................................................................................................................................................11 3.8 CROATIA................................................................................................................................................................................11 3.9 CYPRUS.................................................................................................................................................................................11 3.10 CZECH REPUBLIC...................................................................................................................................................................11 3.11 DENMARK..............................................................................................................................................................................12 3.12 ESTONIA.................................................................................................................................................................................13 3.13 FINLAND................................................................................................................................................................................13 3.14 FRANCE .................................................................................................................................................................................14 3.15 GEORGIA ...............................................................................................................................................................................15 3.16 GERMANY..............................................................................................................................................................................15 3.17 GREECE .................................................................................................................................................................................17 3.18 HUNGARY..............................................................................................................................................................................18 3.19 ICELAND................................................................................................................................................................................18 3.20 IRELAND................................................................................................................................................................................18 3.21 ITALY.....................................................................................................................................................................................19 3.22 LATVIA...................................................................................................................................................................................20 3.23 LITHUANIA.............................................................................................................................................................................20 3.24 LUXEMBOURG ........................................................................................................................................................................20 3.25 MALTA ..................................................................................................................................................................................20 3.26 MOLDOVA .............................................................................................................................................................................20 3.27 THE NETHERLANDS...............................................................................................................................................................20 3.28 NORWAY ...............................................................................................................................................................................22 3.29 POLAND.................................................................................................................................................................................23 3.30 PORTUGAL.............................................................................................................................................................................24 3.31 ROMANIA...............................................................................................................................................................................24 3.32 RUSSIAN FEDERATION ...........................................................................................................................................................25 3.33 SLOVAKIA..............................................................................................................................................................................25 3.34 SLOVENIA ..............................................................................................................................................................................25 3.35 SPAIN.....................................................................................................................................................................................25 3.36 SWEDEN.................................................................................................................................................................................26 3.37 SWITZERLAND........................................................................................................................................................................27 3.38 TURKEY.................................................................................................................................................................................28 3.39 UNITED KINGDOM.................................................................................................................................................................28 3.40 YUGOSLAVIA (SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO)...........................................................................................................................30 4 COMPARISON OF EUROPEAN COUNTRIES ..................................................................................31
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National HPC Task-Force Modeling and Organizational Guidelines
    FP7-INFRASTRUCTURES-2010-2 HP-SEE High-Performance Computing Infrastructure for South East Europe’s Research Communities Deliverable 2.2 National HPC task-force modeling and organizational guidelines Author(s): HP-SEE Consortium Status –Version: Final Date: June 14, 2011 Distribution - Type: Public Code: HPSEE-D2.2-e-2010-05-28 Abstract: Deliverable D2.2 defines the guidelines for set-up of national HPC task forces and their organisational model. It identifies and addresses all topics that have to be considered, collects and analyzes experiences from several European and SEE countries, and use them to provide guidelines to the countries from the region in setting up national HPC initiatives. Copyright by the HP-SEE Consortium The HP-SEE Consortium consists of: GRNET Coordinating Contractor Greece IPP-BAS Contractor Bulgaria IFIN-HH Contractor Romania TUBITAK ULAKBIM Contractor Turkey NIIFI Contractor Hungary IPB Contractor Serbia UPT Contractor Albania UOBL ETF Contractor Bosnia-Herzegovina UKIM Contractor FYR of Macedonia UOM Contractor Montenegro RENAM Contractor Moldova (Republic of) IIAP NAS RA Contractor Armenia GRENA Contractor Georgia AZRENA Contractor Azerbaijan D2.2 National HPC task-force modeling and organizational guidelines Page 2 of 53 This document contains material, which is the copyright of certain HP-SEE beneficiaries and the EC, may not be reproduced or copied without permission. The commercial use of any information contained in this document may require a license from the proprietor of that information. The beneficiaries do not warrant that the information contained in the report is capable of use, or that use of the information is free from risk, and accept no liability for loss or damage suffered by any person using this information.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovatives Supercomputing in Deutschland
    inSiDE • Vol. 6 No.1 • Spring 2008 Innovatives Supercomputing in Deutschland Editorialproposals for the development of soft- Contents ware in the field of high performance Welcome to this first issue of inSiDE in computing. The projects within this soft- 2008. German supercomputing is keep- ware framework are expected to start News ing the pace of the last year with the in autumn 2008 and inSiDE will keep Automotive Simulation Centre Stuttgart (ASCS) founded 4 Gauss Centre for Supercomputing taking reporting on this. the lead. The collaboration between the JUGENE officially unveiled 6 three national supercomputing centres Again we have included a section on (HLRS, LRZ and NIC) is making good applications running on one of the three PRACE Project launched 7 progress. At the same time European main German supercomputing systems. supercomputing has seen a boost. In this In this issue the reader will find six issue you will read about the most recent articles about the various fields of appli- Applications developments in the field in Germany. cations and how they exploit the various Drag Reduction by Dimples? architectures made available. The sec- An Investigation Relying Upon HPC 8 In January the European supercomput- tion not only reflects the wide variety of ing infrastructure project PRACE was simulation research in Germany but at Turbulent Convection in large-aspect-ratio Cells 14 started and is making excellent prog- the same time nicely shows how various Editorial ress led by Prof. Achim Bachem from architectures provide users with the Direct Numerical Simulation Contents the Gauss Centre. In February the fast- best hardware technology for all of their of Flame / Acoustic Interactions 18 est civil supercomputer JUGENE was problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments in Supercomputing
    John von Neumann Institute for Computing Recent Developments in Supercomputing Th. Lippert published in NIC Symposium 2008, G. M¨unster, D. Wolf, M. Kremer (Editors), John von Neumann Institute for Computing, J¨ulich, NIC Series, Vol. 39, ISBN 978-3-9810843-5-1, pp. 1-8, 2008. c 2008 by John von Neumann Institute for Computing Permission to make digital or hard copies of portions of this work for personal or classroom use is granted provided that the copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy otherwise requires prior specific permission by the publisher mentioned above. http://www.fz-juelich.de/nic-series/volume39 Recent Developments in Supercomputing Thomas Lippert J¨ulich Supercomputing Centre, Forschungszentrum J¨ulich 52425 J¨ulich, Germany E-mail: [email protected] Status and recent developments in the field of supercomputing on the European and German level as well as at the Forschungszentrum J¨ulich are presented. Encouraged by the ESFRI committee, the European PRACE Initiative is going to create a world-leading European tier-0 supercomputer infrastructure. In Germany, the BMBF formed the Gauss Centre for Supercom- puting, the largest national association for supercomputing in Europe. The Gauss Centre is the German partner in PRACE. With its new Blue Gene/P system, the J¨ulich supercomputing centre has realized its vision of a dual system complex and is heading for Petaflop/s already in 2009. In the framework of the JuRoPA-Project, in cooperation with German and European industrial partners, the JSC will build a next generation general purpose system with very good price-performance ratio and energy efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • (PDF) Kostenlos
    David Gugerli | Ricky Wichum Simulation for All David Gugerli Ricky Wichum The Politics of Supercomputing in Stuttgart David Gugerli, Ricky Wichum SIMULATION FOR ALL THE POLITICS OF SUPERCOMPUTING IN STUTTGART Translator: Giselle Weiss Cover image: Installing the Cray-2 in the computing center on 7 October 1983 (Polaroid UASt). Cover design: Thea Sautter, Zürich © 2021 Chronos Verlag, Zürich ISBN 978-3-0340-1621-6 E-Book (PDF): DOI 10.33057/chronos.1621 German edition: ISBN 978-3-0340-1620-9 Contents User’s guide 7 The centrality issue (1972–1987) 13 Gaining dominance 13 Planning crisis and a flood of proposals 15 5 Attempted resuscitation 17 Shaping policy and organizational structure 22 A diversity of machines 27 Shielding users from complexity 31 Communicating to the public 34 The performance gambit (1988–1996) 41 Simulation for all 42 The cost of visualizing computing output 46 The false security of benchmarks 51 Autonomy through regional cooperation 58 Stuttgart’s two-pronged solution 64 Network to the rescue (1997–2005) 75 Feasibility study for a national high-performance computing network 77 Metacomputing – a transatlantic experiment 83 Does the university really need an HLRS? 89 Grid computing extends a lifeline 95 Users at work (2006–2016) 101 6 Taking it easy 102 With Gauss to Europe 106 Virtual users, and users in virtual reality 109 Limits to growth 112 A history of reconfiguration 115 Acknowledgments 117 Notes 119 Bibliography 143 List of Figures 153 User’s guide The history of supercomputing in Stuttgart is fascinating. It is also complex. Relating it necessarily entails finding one’s own way and deciding meaningful turning points.
    [Show full text]
  • © Flogen2019 1 |
    © FLOGEN2019 1 | www.flogen.org/sips2019 Leadership Team Dr. Florian Kongoli SIPS President Chairman FLOGEN STARS OUTREACH. Canada Symposia Committees Florian Kongoli Fernand Marquis Marcelle G-Escard Lijie Guo FLOGEN Technologies San Diego State U. POLYTECH, BGRIMM Canada USA CNRS/IUSTI Technology Group France China Haruhiko Inufasa Yoshihito Kawamura Katerina Aifantis Elias Aifantis CEO, TIMA/Gifu Kumamoto University University of Florida Aristotle U. of University Japan USA Thessaloniki Japan Greece © FLOGEN2019 2 | www.flogen.org/sips2019 Miguel A. Alario Shumskiy Viktor Christian Amatore Juergen Franco Alexandrovich CNRS&PSL, French Antrekowitsch Complutense U. of Science of Metallurgy Acad. of Sce. and Christian Doppler Madrid, Spain Kazakhstan Xiamen U. France Laboratory Austria Paulo Assis Greg Baiden Mariana Calin Claudio Capiglia U. of Ouro Preto / Penguin Automated IFW Dresden Recruit R&D REDEMAT Brazil Systems Canada Germany Japan David Carey Carlos Cavalca Andrew Chan Hong-Yuan Chen Bear Metallurgical Dupont U. of Tasmania Nanjing U. Company USA USA Australia China Nikoloz Chikhradze Marcos de Campos Jose A. de Castro Antonio de Lucas G. Tsulukidze Mining UFF - Federal UFF - Federal Consuegra Inst. Fluminense U. Fluminense U. U. of Castilla La Georgia Brazil Brazil Mancha Spain © FLOGEN2019 3 | www.flogen.org/sips2019 Harold Dodds Jean-Marie Dubois Jairton Dupont David Dzombak U. of Tennessee Inst. Jean Lamour UFRGS Carnegie Mellon USA France Brazil U.(CMU) USA Angelos Efstathiou Jean Etourneau Michael Fardis Rasmus Fehrmann U. of Cyprus U. of Bordeaux U. of Patras DTU Chemistry Cyprus France Greece Denmark Athan Fox Dariusz Gawin Hasan Giray Mery-Cecilia Aurelius Environmental Lodz U. of Technology Eti Krom Gomez-Marroquin UK Poland Turkey National U.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report
    Progress Report 2008–2009 We owe special thanks to the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) for its financial support for numerous projects of the research facilities of the Austrian Academy of Sciences All rights reserved Copyright © 2009 by Austrian Academy of Sciences Layout: Art Quarterly Publishing House Werbe- und PR-Agentur GmbH. Printed and bound: Wograndl 3 Table of contents Preface . 5 RESEARCH FACILITIES OF THE SECTION FOR MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL SCIENCES Biology and Medicine CeMM – Research Center for Molecular Medicine GmbH . 11 Breath Research Institute . 14 GMI – Gregor Mendel Institute of Molecular Plant Biology . 18 IMBA – Institute of Molecular Biotechnology GmbH . 22 Institute for Biomedical Aging Research . 26 Institute for Biophysics and Nanosystems Research . 30 Konrad Lorenz Institute for Ethology . 34 Earth Sciences Institute for Geographic Information Science . 37 Center for Geosciences . 40 Commission for the Palaeontological and Stratigraphical Research of Austria . 42 Commission for Geophysical Research . 45 Commission for Quaternary Research . 48 Commission for Basic Research on Mineral Raw Materials . 51 Mathematics, Simulation and Metrology Institute for Integrated Sensor Systems . 55 Acoustics Research Institute . 58 Johann Radon Institute for Computational and Applied Mathematics . 61 Commission for Scientific Visualization . 65 Physics and Materials Sciences Erich Schmid Institute of Materials Science . 68 Institute of High Energy Physics . 71 Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information . 74 Stefan Meyer Institute for Subatomic Physic. 77 Environmental Research Institute for Limnology . 80 Institute of Technology Assessment . 83 Commission for Interdisciplinary Ecological Studies . 86 Space Research Space Research Institute . 89 Commission for Astronomy . 92 Interdepartmental Research Tasks Commission for Scientific Co-operation with the Austrian Federal Ministry of Defence and Sports .
    [Show full text]
  • City University of New York: Statement of Cooperation in Science and Research
    Austria – City University of New York: Statement of Cooperation in Science and Research QUOTATION Statement of Cooperation between the Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of the Republic of Austria and the City University of New York, United States of America, concerning cooperation in science and research2 Date of signature: 5 July 2005, Vienna Date of publication: ---1 Effective date: 6 July 2005 Authentic language version: English TEXT In recognition of the excellent and long-standing cooperation based on mutual trust and benefit between the City University of New York, United States of America, and the Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, hereinafter referred to as “sides”, hereby announce their intention to engage in future cooperation as follows: Article 1 Both sides welcome and encourage the manifold cooperation activities between the City University of New York and Austrian Universities and Universities of Applied Sciences in Teaching and Research. Article 2 Both sides welcome and endorse the signing of the Memorandum of Agreement between the City University of New York and the Austrian Universities (Graz University of Technology, University of Graz, University of Innsbruck, University of Leoben, University of 2 This text is not an agreement in the sense of international law, but a memorandum of faith of the respective competent authorities, on the American side only for the State of New York (thus, however, with the prospective effect of precedent). Therefore a publication in the Austrian
    [Show full text]
  • MATHEMATICIANS at up IAM and up FAMNIT REPORT 2014
    MATHEMATICIANS at UP IAM and UP FAMNIT REPORT 2014 UNIVERSITY OF PRIMORSKA FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS, NATURAL SCIENCES AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES (UP FAMNIT) Glagoljaška 8, SI-6000 Koper, Slovenia ANDREJ MARUŠICˇ INSTITUTE (UP IAM) Muzejski trg 2, SI-6000 Koper, Slovenia Mathematicians at UP IAM/UP FAMNIT Report 2014 Edited by Samed Bajric,´ Tatiana Romina Hartinger, Samir Hodžic,´ Ademir Hujdurovic,´ Karla Ferjanciˇ c,ˇ Boštjan Frelih, PawełPetecki and Edward Dobson. Koper, January 2015. CONTENTS University of Primorska . 3 UPFAMNIT..................................................... 4 UPIAM ........................................................ 7 Mathematicians at UP IAM/UP FAMNIT . 8 Research Programs . 9 Research Projects . 9 Bilateral Projects . 10 Ars Mathematica Contemporanea (AMC) . 11 ESF EuroGIGA GReGAS . 13 Project UP and the World . 15 Organized Events in 2014 . 16 International Conference on Graph Theory and Combinatorics . 16 2014 PhD Summer School in Discrete Mathematics and Symmetries of Graphs and Networks IV . 17 Ljubljana - Leoben Graph Theory Seminar 2014 . 19 3rd annual Mississippi Discrete Mathematics Workshop . 21 Research Mathematical Seminar . 22 Summer Math Camp “Mathematics is Cool” . 24 Famnit Excursions into the Mathematical Universe . 25 Preparations for the International Mathematical Olympiad . 26 Visiting Professors and Researchers . 27 Research Visits . 28 Conference Attendances . 29 Invited Lectures at Research Institutes/Universities . 30 Publications . 31 Editors of SCI Journals . 39 2014 Highlights of Mathematicians at UP FAMNIT & UP IAM . 40 2015 Math Meetings/Workshops organized by Math Department . 42 2 UNIVERSITY OF PRIMORSKA (UP) The University of Primorska (Univerza na Primorskem; Universita del Litorale; UP) was es- tablished by the Slovenian parliament on January 29, 2003 and was registered at the District Court of the city Koper on March 3, 2003 thus becoming a legal entity.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE Name: Mateo Valero Position: Full Professor (since 1983) Contact: Phone: +34-93- Affiliation: Universitat Politécnica de Catalunya 4016979 / 6986 (UPC) Fax: +34-93-4017055 Computer Architecture Department E-mail: [email protected] Postal Address: Jordi Girona 1-3, Módulo D6 URL 08034 – Barcelona, Spain www.ac.upc.es/homes/mateo 1. Summary Professor Mateo Valero, born in 1952 (Alfamén, Zaragoza), obtained his Telecommunication Engineering Degree from the Technical University of Madrid (UPM) in 1974 and his Ph.D. in Telecommunications from the Technical University of Catalonia (UPC) in 1980. He has been teaching at UPC since 1974; since 1983 he has been a full professor at the Computer Architecture Department. He has also been a visiting professor at ENSIMAG, Grenoble (France) and at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). He has been Chair of the Computer Architecture Department (1983-84; 1986-87; 1989- 90 and 2001-2005) and the Dean of the Computer Engineering School (1984-85). His research is in the area of computer architecture, with special emphasis on high performance computers: processor organization, memory hierarchy, systolic array processors, interconnection networks, numerical algorithms, compilers and performance evaluation. Professor Valero has co-authored over 600 publications: over 450 in Conferences and the rest in Journals and Books Chapters. He was involved in the organization of more than 300 International Conferences as General Chair (11), including ICS95, ISCA98, ICS99 and PACT01, Steering Committee member (85), Program Chair (26) including ISCA06, Micro05, ICS07 and PACT04, Program Committee member (200), Invited Speaker (70), and Session Chair (61). He has given over 400 talks in conferences, universities and companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Financing the Future of Supercomputing: How to Increase
    INNOVATION FINANCE ADVISORY STUDIES Financing the future of supercomputing How to increase investments in high performance computing in Europe years Financing the future of supercomputing How to increase investment in high performance computing in Europe Prepared for: DG Research and Innovation and DG Connect European Commission By: Innovation Finance Advisory European Investment Bank Advisory Services Authors: Björn-Sören Gigler, Alberto Casorati and Arnold Verbeek Supervisor: Shiva Dustdar Contact: [email protected] Consultancy support: Roland Berger and Fraunhofer SCAI © European Investment Bank, 2018. All rights reserved. All questions on rights and licensing should be addressed to [email protected] Financing the future of supercomputing Foreword “Disruptive technologies are key enablers for economic growth and competitiveness” The Digital Economy is developing rapidly worldwide. It is the single most important driver of innovation, competitiveness and growth. Digital innovations such as supercomputing are an essential driver of innovation and spur the adoption of digital innovations across multiple industries and small and medium-sized enterprises, fostering economic growth and competitiveness. Applying the power of supercomputing combined with Artificial Intelligence and the use of Big Data provide unprecedented opportunities for transforming businesses, public services and societies. High Performance Computers (HPC), also known as supercomputers, are making a difference in the everyday life of citizens by helping to address the critical societal challenges of our times, such as public health, climate change and natural disasters. For instance, the use of supercomputers can help researchers and entrepreneurs to solve complex issues, such as developing new treatments based on personalised medicine, or better predicting and managing the effects of natural disasters through the use of advanced computer simulations.
    [Show full text]
  • RES Updates, Resources and Access / European HPC Ecosystem
    RES updates, resources and Access European HPC ecosystem Sergi Girona RES Coordinator RES: HPC Services for Spain •The RES was created in 2006. •It is coordinated by the Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC-CNS). •It forms part of the Spanish “Map of Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures” (ICTS). RES: HPC Services for Spain RES is made up of 12 institutions and 13 supercomputers. BSC MareNostrum CESGA FinisTerrae CSUC Pirineus & Canigo BSC MinoTauro UV Tirant UC Altamira UPM Magerit CénitS Lusitania & SandyBridge UMA PiCaso IAC La Palma UZ CaesarAugusta SCAYLE Caléndula UAM Cibeles 1 10 100 1000 TFlop/s (logarithmiC sCale) RES: HPC Services for Spain • Objective: coordinate and manage high performance computing services to promote the progress of excellent science and innovation in Spain. • It offers HPC services for non-profit, open R&D purposes. • Since 2006, it has granted more than 1,000 Million CPU hours to 2,473 research activities. Research areas Hours granted per area 23% AECT 30% Mathematics, physics Astronomy, space and engineering and earth sciences BCV FI QCM 19% 28% Life and health Chemistry and sciences materials sciences RES supercomputers BSC (MareNostrum 4) 165888 cores, 11400 Tflops Main processors: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8160 Memory: 390 TB Disk: 14 PB UPM (Magerit II) 3920 cores, 103 Tflops Main processors : IBM Power7 3.3 GHz Memory: 7840 GB Disk: 1728 TB UMA (Picasso) 4016 cores, 84Tflops Main processors: Intel SandyBridge-EP E5-2670 Memory: 22400 GB Disk: 720 TB UV (Tirant 3) 5376 cores, 111,8 Tflops
    [Show full text]
  • CONICYT Ranking Por Disciplina > Sub-Área OECD (Académicas) Comisión Nacional De Investigación 2
    CONICYT Ranking por Disciplina > Sub-área OECD (Académicas) Comisión Nacional de Investigación 2. Ingeniería y Tecnología > 2.11 Otras Ingenierías y Tecnologías Científica y Tecnológica PAÍS INSTITUCIÓN RANKING PUNTAJE INDIA Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT System) 1 5,000 CHINA Harbin Institute of Technology 2 5,000 FRANCE Universite Paris Saclay (ComUE) 3 5,000 CHINA Tsinghua University 4 5,000 GERMANY Technical University of Munich 5 5,000 CHINA Zhejiang University 6 5,000 CHINA Shanghai Jiao Tong University 7 5,000 CHINA Beihang University 8 5,000 SINGAPORE Nanyang Technological University & National Institute of Education 9 5,000 CHINA Huazhong University of Science & Technology 10 5,000 SWITZERLAND ETH Zurich 11 5,000 USA University of California Berkeley 12 5,000 USA Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 13 5,000 ITALY Polytechnic University of Milan 14 5,000 ITALY University of Naples Federico II 15 5,000 USA University of Maryland College Park 16 5,000 IRAN Islamic Azad University 17 5,000 CHINA South China University of Technology 18 5,000 USA Stanford University 19 5,000 ITALY University of Bologna 20 5,000 SINGAPORE National University of Singapore 21 5,000 USA University of Wisconsin Madison 22 5,000 CHINA Jiangnan University 23 5,000 USA California Institute of Technology 24 5,000 USA Purdue University 25 5,000 BELGIUM Ghent University 26 5,000 USA University of Michigan 27 5,000 NETHERLANDS Wageningen University & Research 28 5,000 GERMANY RWTH Aachen University 29 5,000 BELGIUM KU Leuven 30 5,000 CHINA Wuhan
    [Show full text]