October 23, 2009

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

October 23, 2009 Integrity Commissioner of Nunavut Commissaire à l’intégrité du Nunavut ᐃᒻᒥᒧᑦ ᐊᒡᕕᐊᕈᑎᖃᖅᑕᐃᓕᒪᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᑲᒥᓴᓇ ᓄᓇᕗᒥ Immimut Agviarutiqaqtailimanirmut Kamisana October 23, 2009 The Honourable James Arreak, MLA, Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of Nunavut, Iqaluit, Nunavut Dear Mr. Speaker, Pursuant to section 44 of the Integrity Act, I am submitting my Report concerning Mr. Paul Okalik, MLA. Respectfully, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Norman Pickell Integrity Commissioner 58 South Street, ᒑᑐᕆᒃ, ᐊᓐᑎᐅᕆᔪ, ᑲᓇᑕ N7A 3L5 ᐅᖄᓚᐅᑖ: 888-398-2785 or (519) 524 2954 ᓱᒃᑲᔪᒃᑯᑦ: (519) 524-5107 58 South Street, Goderich, Ontario, Canada N7A 3L5 Tel: 888-398-2785 or (519) 524 2954 Fax: (519) 524-5107 [email protected] www.integritycom.nu.ca Legislative Assembly of Nunavut Report to the Speaker Re: Mr. Paul Okalik, MLA October 23, 2009 Norman Pickell Integrity Commissioner RE: MR. PAUL OKALIK, MLA Request for a Review: This is a review pursuant to section 36 of the Integrity Act of Nunavut (herein referred to as the “Integrity Act”). Mr. Hunter Tootoo has asked me to review the conduct of Mr. Paul Okalik during the 2008 territorial election campaign. Complainant and Respondent: The Complainant, Mr. Hunter Tootoo, was the Member of the Legislative Assembly (herein referred to as “MLA”) for Iqaluit Centre and a regular member of the Second Legislative Assembly of Nunavut. This means he was not part of the Executive Council of Nunavut in that Assembly. The Respondent, Mr. Paul Okalik, was the MLA for Iqaluit West and the Premier of Nunavut during the Second Legislative Assembly. Both Mr. Tootoo and Mr. Okalik were re-elected in the Third General Election held on October 27, 2008. The Allegations: Mr. Tootoo alleges that Mr. Okalik contravened sections 4(a) and (b) and section 10 of the Integrity Act. Sections 4(a) and (b) of the Act state: 4. Each member shall (a) perform his or her duties of office and arrange his or her private affairs in such a manner as to maintain public confidence and trust in the integrity, objectivity and impartiality of the member; (b) refrain from accepting any remuneration, gift or benefit the acceptance of which might erode public confidence and trust in the integrity, objectivity or impartiality of the member, and in all other respects act in a manner that will bear the closest public scrutiny; Section 10 of the Act states: 2 10. A member shall not use his or her office to seek to influence a decision made or to be made by another person so as to further the member’s private interest or improperly to further another person’s private interest. The basis for Mr. Tootoo’s allegations are fundraising letters which were sent to Deputy Ministers in the Nunavut Government by campaign officials for Mr. Okalik during the election campaign for the Third General Election. The Procedure to Initiate a Review under the Integrity Act: Section 36 of the Act allows any person, including an MLA, to ask the Integrity Commissioner to review the conduct of another MLA. There are certain requirements in the Act that must be met before the Integrity Commissioner can conduct such a review. If the request is coming from someone other than the Premier or the Legislative Assembly, 1. The person requesting the review must have reasonable grounds for believing that there has been a contravention of the Act; 2. The request to the Integrity Commissioner must be in writing; and 3. The facts to support the allegations must be in an affidavit. Background: On October 30, 2008, Mr. Hunter Tootoo sent me a letter by fax. Accompanying his letter was an Affidavit that Mr. Tootoo swore on October 30, 2008. Mr. Tootoo’s letter requested me to review “the conduct of the Premier, the Honourable Paul Okalik.” The letter also said: “I believe Mr. Okalik contravened s. 4(a) & (b) and s. 10 of the [Integrity] Act by attempting to use his position as Premier and his authority over Deputy Ministers to solicit campaign contributions from Deputy Ministers.” Mr. Tootoo’s 11-paragraph Affidavit set out certain allegations in support of his request for the review. On November 3, 2008, I sent a letter to Mr. Okalik with a copy of Mr. Tootoo’s Affidavit. I asked Mr. Okalik to provide me with a written response to the allegations made by Mr. Tootoo. 3 Mr. Okalik sent me his initial written response on November 11, 2008. The final evidence on behalf of Mr. Okalik was received by me on October 15, 2009. His lawyer’s Submissions were sent to me on October 17, 2009. During the course of my Review, I received information – some of it oral, some of it written - from: Mr. Hunter Tootoo - the complainant Mr. Paul Okalik - the subject of this review Mr. Bill Clay - the Principal Secretary to Mr. Okalik when he was Premier Mr. Patrick Orr - the lawyer for Elections Nunavut Ms. Nadine Ciccone - the Financial Agent for Paul Okalik during the election campaign Ms. Anne Crawford - the lawyer for Mr. Okalik My Jurisdiction During the Election Campaign: The conduct of Paul Okalik that I am being asked to review occurred after September 23, 2008 and before October 27, 2008. In other words, it took place during the election campaign leading up to the October 27, 2008 territorial election. In his response to Mr. Tootoo’s allegations, Mr. Okalik urges me to find that the Integrity Act did not apply to him during the election campaign, and hence I do not have jurisdiction to conduct a review. The Integrity Act only applies to MLAs. It does not apply to a person who is not an MLA. Furthermore, my jurisdiction as Integrity Commissioner under the Integrity Act authorizes me to deal only with MLAs. I do not have any power to review the conduct of a person who is not an MLA. On September 18, 2008, the Fourth Session of the Second Legislative Assembly ended. But the writ of election was not issued until September 22, 2008. That means that all those who held office as an MLA on September 18, 2008 remained an MLA until September 22, 2008. However, all of the regular MLAs ceased to be MLAs on September 23, 2008. In fact, there were no regular MLAs in Nunavut from September 23, 2008 until after the territorial election on October 27, 2008. 4 Therefore, if Mr. Okalik had been a regular MLA in the Second Legislative Assembly, I would have no jurisdiction to review his conduct during the election campaign. But Mr. Okalik was the Premier of Nunavut during the Second Legislative Assembly. The Legislative Assembly and Executive Council Act, S.Nu. 2002, c.5, states in part: section 60(1) “There shall be an Executive Council of Nunavut composed of (a) a Premier chosen by the Legislative Assembly from among its members; …” section 63(2) “The person who holds the office of Premier at the time of expiration or dissolution of the Legislative Assembly continues to hold the office of Premier until the next Premier is chosen at the first session of the next Legislative Assembly.” Therefore, I find that the Premier remains an MLA and Premier until the next Premier is chosen after the election. Accordingly, I find that the Integrity Act, including the review provisions, applies to the Premier during an election campaign. Another requirement is that the person who is subject to my review must be an MLA during the time that I conduct my review. Since Mr. Okalik was re-elected in the Third General Election held on October 27, 2008, I have jurisdiction to review his conduct during the election campaign. Such would not have been the case if Mr. Okalik had been defeated on October 27, 2008. Issue: This review is to determine if Mr. Okalik contravened the Integrity Act by the Re-Elect Paul Okalik Campaign soliciting campaign contributions from Deputy Ministers in the Nunavut Government. Burden and Standard of Proof: Generally a person who alleges that an MLA has contravened the Act must establish the allegations by clear and convincing evidence. The standard of proof is high. Undisputed Facts: Most of the facts are agreed upon. These are: 5 1. Mr. Okalik has been the MLA for the constituency of Iqaluit West since April 1, 1999. 2. Mr. Okalik was the Premier of Nunavut for two terms, from April 1, 1999 until November 19, 2008. 3. Mr. Okalik was a candidate in the constituency of Iqaluit West in the general election which was held on October 27, 2008. 4. The Premier holds his position from the time that the Legislative Assembly is dissolved until a Premier is chosen by the next Legislative Assembly. 5. During the election campaign Mr. Okalik announced his intention to seek a third term as Premier should he be re-elected. 6. The Government of Nunavut is divided into various departments, each of which is headed by a non-elected Deputy Minister. 7. Deputy Ministers are appointed to their positions by the Premier and hold the position at the pleasure of the Premier. 8. Deputy Ministers receive annual performance reviews at which time a determination is made whether a Deputy Minister should receive a performance bonus. 9. The Senior Personnel Secretariat makes recommendations to the Premier with respect to performance bonuses. 10. The Premier is the sole person to decide whether to follow the recommendation of the Senior Personnel Secretariat or vary from it. 11. During the election campaign, letters requesting financial contributions to the Re-Elect Paul Okalik Campaign were sent to many individuals and companies. 12. Each fundraising letter was addressed to a specifically named person.
Recommended publications
  • April 27, 2000
    Nunavut Canada LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF NUNAVUT 3rd Session 1st Assembly HANSARD Official Report DAY 42 Thursday, April 27, 2000 Pages 1908 - 1976 Iqaluit Speaker: The Hon. Kevin O’Brien, M.L.A. Legislative Assembly of Nunavut Speaker Hon. Kevin O’Brien (Arviat) Ovide Alakannuark Hon. Ed Picco Hon. Jack Anawak (Akulliq) (Iqaluit East) (Rankin Inlet North) Minister of Health and Social Minister of Justice; Minister of Enoki Irqittuq Services; Minister Nunavut Community Government and (Amittuq) Power Corporation Transportation Deputy Chair, Committee of the Whole Hon. Paul Okalik Hon. Manitok Thompson (Iqaluit West) (Rankin Inlet South-Whale Uriash Puqiqnak Premier; Minister of Executive Cove) (Nattilik) and Intergovernmental Affairs Minister of Housing; Minister of Deputy Speaker Public Works, Hon. Donald Havioyak Telecommunications and Glenn McLean (Kugluktuk) Technical Services (Baker Lake) Hon. James Arvaluk Olayuk Akesuk Hon. Kelvin Ng (Nanulik) (South Baffin) (Cambridge Bay) Minister of Education Deputy Premier; Minister of Jobie Nutarak Finance and Administration; Levi Barnabas (Tunnuniq) Minister of Human Resources; (Quttiktuq) Government House Leader David Iqaqrialu Hon. Peter Kilabuk (Uqqummiut) Hon. Peter Kattuk (Pangnirtung) Deputy Chair, Committee of the (Hudson Bay) Minister of Sustainable Whole Development Hunter Tootoo (Iqaluit Centre) Officers Clerk John Quirke Deputy Clerk Clerk of Committees Law Clerk Sergeant-At-Arms Editors of Hansard Rhoda Perkison Nancy Tupik Susan Cooper Jaco Ishulutak Innirvik Support Services Box
    [Show full text]
  • Elections Nunavut • 2014-2015 Annual Report of the Chief Electoral Officer • Uqqummiut By-Election February 9, 2015 Printed by Elections Nunavut ©2015
    Elections Nunavut • 2014-2015 Annual Report of the Chief Electoral Officer • Uqqummiut By-election February 9, 2015 Printed by Elections Nunavut ©2015 For more information or to obtain copies of this report in any of the Nunavut’s official languages, in paper or electronic format contact: Elections Nunavut Box 39 41 Sivulliq Ave. Rankin Inlet, NU X0C 0G0 (800.267.4394 6800.269.1125 www.elections.nu.ca :[email protected] June 30, 2015 Hon. George Qulaut Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of Nunavut 926 Federal Road Iqaluit, NU X0A 0H0 Dear Mr. Speaker: I am pleased to provide you with my 2014-2015 Annual Report and report on the administration of the 2015 By-Election in Uqqummiut. At your convenience I can answer any questions that may arise from the report. Sandy Kusugak Chief Electoral Officer Activities 2014-2015 Legislation Assistant Chief Electoral Officer On November 6, 2014 the Legislative Assembly of Nunavut enacted Bill 10, amending the Nunavut Elections Act to provide for an assistant chief electoral officer. 192.1 (1) The Chief Electoral Officer may appoint an Assistant Chief Electoral Officer, despite the Public Service Act. (2) The Assistant Chief Electoral Officer (a) may exercise the powers and shall perform the duties delegated or assigned by the Chief Electoral Officer as directed by the Chief Electoral Officer; and (b) shall act in the place of the Chief Electoral Officer if he or she is temporarily unable to act because of illness or for another reason and no acting Chief Electoral Officer is appointed under section 193.
    [Show full text]
  • MEETING No. 1*
    NUNAVUT WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT BOARD MINUTES: MEETING No. 1* 25-28 JANUARY 1994 IQALUIT, NT Participants: Ben Kovic Member and Interim Chairperson David Aglukark Member Gordon Koshinsky Member David Iqutsaq Member Kevin McCormick Member Malachi Arreak Member Joannie Ikkidluak Member Andy Theriault Member Christine Tanner Administrative Expediter (Tanmar Srvcs) Marny Twigge Recording Secretary (Tanmar Services) Mary Nashook Interpreter Other Attendees: Also in attendance were members of the public at large, along with various dignitaries and representatives of the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development (DIAND), the GNWT Department of Renewable Resources (DRR), the Department of Environment (DOE), The Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO), the Keewatin Inuit Association (KIA), Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated (NTI), and the GNWT Ministry of Intergovernmental and Aboriginal Affairs (IAA). Inaugural Ceremony Swearing-in of Board Members Swearing-in of the NWMB Board commenced at 9:00 a.m. at Inukshuk High School, with Lazarus Arreak, Director of Communications for NTI, acting as Master of Ceremonies. Following an official welcome and opening remarks by Mr. Arreak, and a kudlik-lighting ceremony by local elder Nakki Ekho, the eight Board Members were officially sworn in by Justice of the Peace Andrew Tagak. Jackie Kooneak was also sworn in at this time as a replacement Board Member for Makivik. * This document was reconstituted from the original Minutes in the interests of enhancing general coherence and promoting conformity with subsequent Minute formats. Congratulatory comments were offered by Marius Tungilik on behalf of the GNWT, by Jack Anawak on behalf of DIAND and the Federal Government, and by James Eetoolook on behalf of NTI.
    [Show full text]
  • White Paper on the Independence and Accountability of Election Administration in the Northwest Territories
    White Paper on the Independence and Accountability of Election Administration in the Northwest Territories December 2016 Table of Contents Forward .................................................................................................................................... iii Assessment of the Independence and Accountability of Elections NWT ............................. 1 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3 2. Independence of Legislative Officers .................................................................................. 3 3. Independence of an Election Management Body .............................................................. 6 4. Legal Foundation for the Establishment of Elections NWT ............................................... 7 5. Mandate of Elections NWT ................................................................................................. 8 6. Duties & Responsibilities of the Chief Electoral Officer ..................................................... 9 7. Powers of the Chief Electoral Officer ............................................................................... 11 8. Control of Staffing Levels and Appointments................................................................... 14 9. Financial Autonomy and Funding Arrangements ............................................................. 17 10. CEO’s Appointment & Removal Process, Term of Office & Salary ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • NUNAVUT: BIRTH of a TERRITORY .Contents
    NUNAVUT: BIRTH OF A TERRITORY .Contents "From sea unto sea unto sea" takes on even more significance as 25 000 people, mainly indigenous, celebrate the birth of their new territory and a new government within the Canadian confederation. This special News in Review report documents the division of the former North West Territories into two separate legislative entities. Largely unknown to most southerners, Nunavut in many respects is a vast and new frontier. Its creation however has raised a new awareness of Canada's far north. Introduction Updating the Canadiana Quiz Broadening Your Knowledge Steps to Independence Creating a Government In Their Own Words Northern Lights Challenges to Overcome Reclaiming A Culture Discussion, Research, And Essay Questions. Indicates material appropriate or adaptable for younger viewers. Comprehensive News in Review Study Modules Using both the print and non-print material from various issues of News in Review, teachers and students can create comprehensive, thematic modules that are excellent for research purposes, independent assignments, and small group study. We recommend the stories indicated below for the universal issues they represent and for the archival and historic material they contain. "Canada Now: A Diverse Landscape," A 1992 Hour-long Special "Arctic Plane Crash: The Perilous North," December 1991 "Davis Inlet: Moving From Misery" March 1993 "NWT Election: The North In Transition," November 1995 "Ice Station Sheba: The Warming Arctic," September 1998 NUNAVUT: BIRTH OF A TERRITORY .Introduction On April 1, 1999, Canadian history was made. The new territory of Nunavut was welcomed into Canada, and the face of the Canadian map was changed for the first time in 50 years.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPERIENCES 2021 Table of Contents
    NUNAVUT EXPERIENCES 2021 Table of Contents Arts & Culture Alianait Arts Festival Qaggiavuut! Toonik Tyme Festival Uasau Soap Nunavut Development Corporation Nunatta Sunakkutaangit Museum Malikkaat Carvings Nunavut Aqsarniit Hotel And Conference Centre Adventure Arctic Bay Adventures Adventure Canada Arctic Kingdom Bathurst Inlet Lodge Black Feather Eagle-Eye Tours The Great Canadian Travel Group Igloo Tourism & Outfitting Hakongak Outfitting Inukpak Outfitting North Winds Expeditions Parks Canada Arctic Wilderness Guiding and Outfitting Tikippugut Kool Runnings Quark Expeditions Nunavut Brewing Company Kivalliq Wildlife Adventures Inc. Illu B&B Eyos Expeditions Baffin Safari About Nunavut Airlines Canadian North Calm Air Travel Agents Far Horizons Anderson Vacations Top of the World Travel p uit O erat In ed Iᓇᓄᕗᑦ *denotes an n u q u ju Inuit operated nn tau ut Aula company About Nunavut Nunavut “Our Land” 2021 marks the 22nd anniversary of Nunavut becoming Canada’s newest territory. The word “Nunavut” means “Our Land” in Inuktut, the language of the Inuit, who represent 85 per cent of Nunavut’s resident’s. The creation of Nunavut as Canada’s third territory had its origins in a desire by Inuit got more say in their future. The first formal presentation of the idea – The Nunavut Proposal – was made to Ottawa in 1976. More than two decades later, in February 1999, Nunavut’s first 19 Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) were elected to a five year term. Shortly after, those MLAs chose one of their own, lawyer Paul Okalik, to be the first Premier. The resulting government is a public one; all may vote - Inuit and non-Inuit, but the outcomes reflect Inuit values.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Northern Vision
    Canada’s Northern Vision Terry Fenge Ottawa-based consultant In mid-December 2004 Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin joined the three territorial First Ministers Joseph Handley (Northwest Territories), Dennis Fentie (Yukon), and Paul Okalik (Nunavut) to announce their shared intent to develop a wide-ranging Northern Strategy. Scheduled to be released in spring 2005 the strategy was still incomplete when the ruling Liberal gov- ernment was defeated in 23 January 2006 federal election which brought Stephen Harper’s Conservatives to power. Surprisingly, the Arctic featured prominently in the election campaign as a result of the 9 January 2006 release by the President of the United States of a National Security and Homeland Security directive dealing with the Arctic which reiterated a long-standing American position that the Northwest Passage “is a strait used for inter- national navigation”. In response, Prime Minister designate Harper firmly outlined Canada’s view that the Northwest Passage is its “internal waters” over which Canada enjoys full ownership, jurisdiction and control. Canada and the USA have jockeyed over the legal status of the passage since the late 1960s when Humble Oil, a US corporation, sent the supertanker Manhattan to test the passage without seeking Canada’s permission. Since the 2006 federal election, asserting Arctic sovereignty has been a constant theme of the Government of Canada. Prime Minister Harper has made a point of visiting the Canadian Arctic every summer and his govern- ment has announced various initiatives to strengthen Canada’s Arctic sov- ereignty claim, including bolstering the ability of the Canadian armed forces to operate in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • February 26, 2016
    Nunavut Canada LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF NUNAVUT 3rd Session 4th Assembly HANSARD Official Report DAY 18 Friday, February 26, 2016 Pages 860 – 903 Iqaluit Speaker: The Honourable George Qulaut, M.L.A. Legislative Assembly of Nunavut Speaker Hon. George Qulaut (Amittuq) Tony Akoak Hon. George Kuksuk Hon. Paul Quassa (Gjoa Haven) (Arviat North-Whale Cove) (Aggu) Deputy Chair, Committee of the Minister of Culture and Heritage; Minister of Government House Leader; Whole Languages; Minister of Family Services; Minister Minister of Education; Minister responsible for Homelessness responsible for Nunavut Arctic Pat Angnakak College (Iqaluit-Niaqunnguu) Steve Mapsalak (Aivilik) Allan Rumbolt Hon. Monica Ell-Kanayuk (Hudson Bay) (Iqaluit-Manirajak) Hon. Johnny Mike Deputy Premier; Minister of (Pangnirtung) Alexander Sammurtok Economic Development and Minister of Environment; Minister responsible for (Rankin Inlet South) Transportation; Minister of the Utility Rates Review Council Energy; Minister responsible for Tom Sammurtok the Status of Women Simeon Mikkungwak (Rankin Inlet North- (Baker Lake) Chesterfield Inlet) Joe Enook Deputy Chair, Committee of the Whole (Tununiq) Hon. Joe Savikataaq Deputy Speaker and Chair of the Hon. Paul Okalik (Arviat South) Committee of the Whole (Iqaluit-Sinaa) Minister of Community and Minister of Health; Minister of Justice; Minister Government Services Hon. George Hickes responsible for Labour; Minister responsible for (Iqaluit-Tasiluk) Immigration; Minister responsible for Suicide Isaac Shooyook Minister responsible
    [Show full text]
  • Elections Nunavut
    Elections Nunavut Report of the Chief Electoral Officer • General Election October 28, 2013 • Rankin Inlet South By-Election February 10, 2014 Printed by Elections Nunavut ©2014 For more information or to obtain copies of this report in any of the Nunavut’s official languages, in paper or electronic format contact: Elections Nunavut Box 39 41 Sivulliq Ave. Rankin Inlet, NU X0C 0G0 (800.267.4394 6800.269.1125 www.elections.nu.ca :[email protected] December 30, 2014 Hon. George Qulaut Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of Nunavut Box 1200 Iqaluit, NU X0A 0H0 Dear Mr. Speaker: I am submitting to you today my report on the 2013 General Election in Nunavut and the subsequent by-election in Rankin Inlet South. I look forward to the review of this report and in particular to your consideration of my recommendations for changes to the Nunavut Elections Act and Plebiscites Act. Sandy Kusugak Chief Electoral Officer Overview On November 6, 2012 the Honourable Edna Elias, Commissioner of Nunavut declared October 28, 2013 to be the day Nunavummiut would go to the polls in a general election. As a result of the 2011 Act Respecting Nunavut Constituencies the number of Members of the Legislative Assembly has increased from nineteen to twenty-two. This number will not change until at least 2023. With improved electronic infrastructure throughout the territory, Elections Nunavut was able to communicate more quickly and effectively to voters, candidates and election officers increasing our ability to recruit and train staff. Issues that arose during and following the election are itemized in Other Matters Related to the October 2013 General Election.
    [Show full text]
  • Made in Nunavut: an Experiment in Decentralized Government, by Jack Hicks and Graham White
    434 • REVIEWS MADE IN NUNAVUT: AN EXPERIMENT IN This difference is important, for despite its subtitle, DECENTRALIZED GOVERNMENT. By JACK HICKS Made in Nunavut is far from being simply a study of admin- and GRAHAM WHITE. Vancouver, British Columbia: istrative planning and organizational design. Decentraliza- UBC Press, 2016. ISBN 978-0-7748-3104-8. xvi + 375 p., tion in Nunavut, in both its planning and its implementation map, notes, index. Softbound. $Cdn34.95; US$37.95. phases, has occurred in a sometimes tempestuous politi- cal and administrative environment. In the period leading Made in Nunavut fills an important gap. Up to now little has up to 1999, relations between the federal government, the been written about the process through which the new ter- GNWT, and Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated, as well as ritory was formed, in the period from 1993 to 1999, and on relations between these bodies, the NIC, and the Office of the extent to which the hopes and aspirations for that terri- the Interim Commissioner, were often strained. Indeed, tory have been realized in the years following its establish- even within these institutions there were stresses and ment. This is the subject matter of Made in Nunavut, with a conflicts. particular focus on the decentralization of certain functions The establishment of a separate territory of Nunavut was of the Nunavut government to various communities across a major accomplishment of Inuit organizations and politi- the territory. It is a work well suited to students of politi- cal leaders from the 1970s to 1999. Although established by cal science, public administration, and northern studies, statute as a territorial public government, similar to those of primarily at the university level, but for some at a college the Northwest Territories and Yukon, at another level this level as well: it provides an enormous information base.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSOLIDATION of NUNAVUT ELECTIONS ACT S.Nu
    CONSOLIDATION OF NUNAVUT ELECTIONS ACT S.Nu. 2002,c.17 In force September 8, 2003: SI 005 2003 (Current to: September 17, 2019) The following provisions have been deleted for the purposes of this consolidation: s.273 to 278 (Consequential Amendments) AS AMENDED BY: S.Nu. 2005,c.3,s.11 s.11 in force March 22, 2005 S.Nu. 2005,c.14 In force December 2, 2005 S.Nu. 2007,c.3 In force March 29, 2007 S.Nu. 2008,c.9 In force June 4, 2008 S.Nu. 2008,c.10,s.45 s.45 in force April 1, 2013: SI-001-2013 S.Nu. 2010,c.26 In force November 4, 2010 S.Nu. 2011,c.6,s.19 s.19 in force February 25, 2011 S.Nu. 2011,c.11,s.1 s.1 in force March 10, 2011 S.Nu. 2011,c.17 In force June 9, 2011 S.Nu. 2011,c.24,s.2 s.2 in force September 23, 2013 S.Nu. 2012,c.17,s.21 s.21 in force June 8, 2012 S.Nu. 2012,c.21,s.1 s.1(1),(5) in force November 5, 2012 s.1(2),(3),(6) in force September 23, 2013 s.1(4) in force September 1, 2016: SI-002-2016 S.Nu. 2013,c.6 In force March 19, 2013 S.Nu. 2013,c.18,s.12 s.12 in force September 23, 2013 S.Nu. 2013,c.26,s.89 s.89 in force September 17, 2013 S.Nu. 2014,c.5,s.2 s.2 in force March 19, 2014 S.Nu.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Better Mousetrap: Patenting Biotechnology In
    3 OKALIK.07-01-07.DOC 7/1/2007 8:59:53 PM NUNAVUT: THE ROAD TO INDIGENOUS SOVEREIGNTY ∗ HONORABLE PAUL OKALIK Let me begin by thanking Siegfried Wiessner. As chair of the Tribal Sovereignty Symposium, he has made it possible for me to be here this afternoon to discuss the experience of the Inuit of Nunavut in re-establishing sovereignty over our traditional lands. As the theme of this panel suggests, there are different models for aboriginal people to follow when it comes to building the economic base and the political structures to achieve self- determination. My panel colleagues, Professor June McCue from the University of British Columbia, and Professor Matthew Fletcher from the University of North Dakota, can probably provide you with a broader view of the different approaches to tribal sovereignty. However, I would like to speak to you about my experience as an Inuk, as a land claims negotiator and as the Premier of Nunavut. In order to speak of Nunavut’s current situation it’s important to have some understanding of where we have come from and how our geography has helped us maintain our distinct culture. In my language of Inuktitut, Nunavut means “our land” and it is our relationship with our land that defines who we are. At first glance, the traditional territories of the Inuit and the native people of South Florida seem about as different as you could possibly experience in North America. But, our Arctic desert and your tropical everglades share some similarities. For the Tequestas and Calusas and later the Seminoles, in time of trouble the Everglades was a sanctuary and a source of strength when resisting colonization.
    [Show full text]