June/Sept 2014
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Lutheran Synod Quarterly VOLUME 54 • NUMBERS 2–3 JUNE–SEPTEMBER 2014 All Have the Law But Fail: An Exegesis of Romans 2 with a Special Emphasis on Verses 14–16 Two Kingdoms: Simul iustus et peccator: Depoliticizing the Two Kingdoms Doctrine The Timeless Word Meets the 21st-Century World Koren’s Pastoral Letter Book Reviews The journal of Bethany Lutheran Theological Seminary ISSN: 0360-9685 Lutheran Synod Quarterly VOLUME 54 • NUMBERS 2–3 JUNE–SEPTEMBER 2014 Te journal of Bethany Lutheran Teological Seminary lutheran Synod Quarterly EDITOR-IN-CHIEF........................................................... Gaylin R. Schmeling BOOK REVIEW EDITOR ......................................................... Michael K. Smith LAYOUT EDITOR ................................................................. Daniel J. Hartwig PRINTER ......................................................... Books of the Way of the Lord The Lutheran Synod Quarterly (ISSN: 0360-9685) is edited by the faculty of Bethany Lutheran Theological Seminary 6 Browns Court Mankato, Minnesota 56001 The Lutheran Synod Quarterly is a continuation of the Clergy Bulletin (1941–1960). The purpose of the Lutheran Synod Quarterly, as was the purpose of the Clergy Bulletin, is to provide a testimony of the theological position of the Evangelical Lutheran Synod and also to promote the academic growth of her clergy roster by providing scholarly articles, rooted in the inerrancy of the Holy Scriptures and the Confessions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church. The Lutheran Synod Quarterly is published in March and December with a combined June and September issue. Subscription rates are $25.00 U.S. per year for domestic subscriptions and $30.00 U.S. per year for international subscriptions. All subscriptions and editorial correspondence should be sent to the following address: Bethany Lutheran Theological Seminary Attn: Lutheran Synod Quarterly 6 Browns Ct Mankato MN 56001 Back issues of the Lutheran Synod Quarterly from the past two years are available at a cost of $8.00 per issue. Back issues of the Lutheran Synod Quarterly and Clergy Bulletin prior to the past two years are available at <www.blts.edu/lsq>. The Lutheran Synod Quarterly is abstracted in Religious and Theological Abstracts, PO Box 215, Myerstown, PA 17067 (E-mail: <[email protected]>; Website: <www.rtabst.org/abstracts>). Copyright ©2014 by Bethany Lutheran Theological Seminary. Requests for permission to reproduce more than brief excerpts are to be directed to the Editor- in-Chief. Contents LSQ Vol. 54, Nos. 2–3 (June–September 2014) All Have the Law But Fail: An Exegesis of Romans 2 with a Special Emphasis on Verses 14-16 ................................................123 Nicholas D. Proksch Two Kingdoms: Simul iustus et peccator: Depoliticizing the Two Kingdoms Doctrine ...............................................................157 Erling T. Teigen The Timeless Word Meets the 21st-Century World .........................185 Matthew W. Crick Koren’s Pastoral Letter...................................................................255 Ulrich Vilhelm Koren BOOK REVIEWS Book Review: The Isoscelized God...............................................267 Gaylin R. Schmeling Book Review: Your Questions, Scripture’s Answers .......................269 Michael K. Smith Book Review: God’s Imagery .......................................................271 Michael K. Smith 120 Lutheran Synod Quarterly Vol. 54 Foreword LSQ Vol. 54, Nos. 2–3 (June–September 2014) HROUGHOUT ROMANS 2, PAUL ELOQUENTLY demonstrates God’s justice and His just condemnation of all people because of their original and actual sin. But on the Tcross of Calvary, God’s strict justice and condemnation are turned into acquittal, freedom, and eternal life for us. Tis important truth is explicated in the exegetical paper by the Rev. Nicholas Proksch entitled, “All Have the Law But Fail: An Exegesis of Romans 2 with a Special Emphasis on Verses 14–16.” Te Rev. Proksch is pastor of Lord of Life Lutheran Church in Holland, Michigan. Te essay, “Two Kingdoms: Simul iustus et peccator: Depoliticizing the Two Kingdoms Doctrine,” gives a summary of the Lutheran doctrine of the two kingdoms. In addition it speaks to the responsi- bility of Christians in each kingdom. Te essay was written by Professor Erling Teigen of Bethany Lutheran College. In his essay, “Te Timeless Word Meets the 21st-Century World,” the Rev. Matthew Crick discusses the Christian’s relationship to 21st-century culture, which is drastically changing. Te frst part of the essay identifes certain characteristics of early 21st-century culture, within which Christians live, and by which Christians, to a degree, are infuenced. Te second part of the essay identifes and discusses various applications of Scripture to meet early 21st-century culture. Te Rev. Crick is pastor of Faith Lutheran Church in Medford, Oregon. 122 Lutheran Synod Quarterly Vol. 54 Tis issue of the Quarterly contains a famous letter of Ulrich Vilhelm Koren addressed to the pastors of the Norwegian Synod. Dr. Koren, who has the reputation of having been one of the greatest theologians in the history of the Lutheran Church in this country, was president of the Norwegian Synod from 1894 until 1912. Te translator of this letter was Dr. S.C. Ylvisaker, who was president of Bethany Lutheran College from 1930 until 1950. Also included in this issue are three book reviews: Te Isolscelized God, Your Questions, Scripture’s Answers, and God’s Imagery. – GRS All Have the Law But Fail: An Exegesis of Romans 2 with a Special Emphasis on Verses 14-16 Nicholas D. Proksch Pastor, Lord of Life Lutheran Church Holland, Michigan LSQ Vol. 54, Nos. 2–3 (June–September 2014) ET JUSTICE BE DONE THOUGH the heavens fall,” is a maxim from Roman antiquity that exemplifes their fanaticism in executing justice.1 Appropriate it is, then, that the beginning Lof Paul’s Epistle to the Romans meticulously seeks to preserve the truth of God’s righteous justice. Paul is dealing with the grand scope of what is a just judgment regarding humanity as it stands before God. As Christianity incorporates both Jews and Gentiles many questions of favoritism arise, just as there can be many excuses before the law. Are the Jews more righteous? How is the condemnation of the Gentiles just, if they never even had the law? Who will be declared righteous in God’s courtroom and why? In Romans 2, Paul seeks to prove how God is perfectly just. God’s justice depends both on impartiality and equality before the law. To show equality, Paul argues that both Jews and Gentiles have the law— whether written or also on the heart—and building up to 3:20, that both fail to accomplish the law for various reasons.2 Tat the unbelieving Gentiles fail to fulfll the law is outlined in Romans 1:18–32. Paul then explains in 2:1–11 how anyone who thinks himself superior to those Gentiles is no better because such a person does the same things as well. In Romans 2:12–16, Paul establishes that Gentiles have the law written 1 Te maxim’s origin is uncertain, but regardless it describes the strong sense of justice in Roman culture and literature. 2 Romans 3:20: “Terefore, no one will be justifed by works of the law, for through the law there is knowledge of sin.” 124 Lutheran Synod Quarterly Vol. 54 in their heart, and thus they can be justly condemned before that law. Finally, in Romans 2:17–29, Paul shows that the Jews have no advan- tage if seeking to work their own righteousness, because their attitude is plagued with hypocrisy, which is demonstrated most vividly in their false understanding of circumcision. Within the framework of establishing God’s justice and account- ability before the law, Paul in 2:14–16 ofers the main biblical foun- dation for the doctrine of the natural law.3 Paul uses the natural law primarily to establish Gentile accountability before the law and the just condemnation they have in store for themselves. Yet from these verses, Paul gives the Christian insight into natural law and its relationship to both the so-called frst and second uses of the law. Also, in this broader context of Romans, these verses help establish what our expectations should be concerning the extent and application of natural law in society as a whole. Impartiality and Condemnation before God’s Justice: Romans 2:1–11 1 ∆ιὸ4 ἀναπολόγητος εἶ, ὦ ἄνθρωπε5 πᾶς ὁ κρίνων· ἐν ᾧ6 γὰρ κρίνεις τὸν ἕτερον, σεαυτὸν κατακρίνεις, τὰ γὰρ αὐτὰ πράσσεις ὁ κρίνων. 2 οἴδαµεν δὲ ὅτι τὸ κρίµα τοῦ θεοῦ ἐστιν κατὰ ἀλήθειαν ἐπὶ τοὺς τὰ τοιαῦτα πράσσοντας. 3 λογίζῃ δὲ τοῦτο, ὦ ἄνθρωπε ὁ κρίνων τοὺς τὰ τοιαῦτα πράσσοντας καὶ ποιῶν αὐτά, ὅτι σὺ ἐκφεύξῃ τὸ κρίµα τοῦ θεοῦ; 4 ἢ τοῦ πλούτου τῆς χρηστότητος αὐτοῦ καὶ τῆς ἀνοχῆς καὶ τῆς µακροθυµίας καταφρονεῖς, ἀγνοῶν ὅτι τὸ χρηστὸν τοῦ θεοῦ εἰς µετάνοιάν σε ἄγει; 5 κατὰ δὲ τὴν σκληρότητά σου καὶ ἀµετανόητον καρδίαν θησαυρίζεις σεαυτῷ ὀργὴν ἐν ἡµέρᾳ ὀργῆς καὶ ἀποκαλύψεως δικαιοκρισίας τοῦ 3 Romans 2:14–16 will be the main exegetical focus of this paper. Te other portions of Romans 2 will still be treated, although not in the same level of detail and mainly to the extent that they apply to my broader arguments. 4 BDAG, 250, calls this an “inferential conjunction.” Tus the preceding section in Romans 1 (describing the wickedness of the unbelieving world) is closely connected to Romans 2 where Paul explains how all are under that same judgment. See also R. C. H. Lenski, Te Interpretation of St. Paul’s Epistle to the Romans (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1961), 130–131. 5 Michael P. Middendorf, Romans 1–8, Concordia Commentary: A Teological Exposition of Sacred Scripture (St. Louis: Concordia, 2013), 152, suggests handling the vocative “attention grabber” of ὦ by a more colloquial “yes, you” instead of the more archaic “O man.” BDAG, 1101: “Te ὦ interjection associated with the vocative is not only a ‘marker of personal address’ but is also used for ‘mostly expressing emotion.’” Lenski, 131: “Te Greek uses ‘O’ with vocatives sparingly, hence it is strong when it is used.” 6 BDAG, 329, ofers this ἐν ᾧ construction as an example of ἐν being a “marker of circumstance or condition under which something takes place.” Nos.