DOCSLIB.ORG

Judiciary and Fundamental Rights Semi-Annual Report – July– December 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Judiciary and Fundamental Rights Semi-Annual Report – July– December 2018 GOVERNMENT OF MONTENEGRO FOR CHAPTER 23 - JUDICIARY AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT – JULY– DECEMBER 2018 JANUARY 2019 1 Contents 23: Judiciary and Fundamental Rights.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 JUDICIARY............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 INDEPENDENCE OF JUDICIARY ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 STENGTHENING OF IMPARTIALITY IN JUDICIARY.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 21 1.3 ACCOUNTABILITY IN THE JUDICIARY ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 30 1.4 PROFESSIONALISM, COMPETENCE AND EFFICIENCY OF JUDICIARY ....................................................................................................................................................... 32 1.5 DOMESTIC HANDLING OF WAR CRIMES ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 64 2 FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 77 2.1 PREVENTIVE ACTIONS AGAINST CORRUPTION ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 77 2.2 REPRESSIVE ACTIONS AGAINST CORRUPTION .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 247 3 FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 295 4 COOPERATION WITH THE NGO ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 468 OPERATIONAL DOCUMENT ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 484 I PUBLIC PROCUREMENT ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 484 II PRIVATISATION (PUBLICITY AND TRANSPARENCY) ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 496 III URBAN PLANNING .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 504 IV EDUCATION .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 514 V HEALTH CARE SECTOR ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 526 VI LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 567 VII POLICE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 585 2 INTRODUCTION The semi-annual report on the implementation of the Action Plan for Chapter 23 for the period July-December 2018 is the eighth one since the adaptation of the Action Plan of 19 February 2015. In the reporting period, a total of 200 measures from the Action Plan became due for implementation, out of which 13 measures (7%) were implemented, 158 measures (79%) are continuously implemented, 16 measures (8%) were partially implemented and a total of 13 measures (6%) were not implemented. A tabular and graphical representation of the implementation of measures are included hereinafter. A semi-annual report on the implementation of the Operational Document for Corruption Prevention in Special Risk Areas, annex to the Action Plan, for the period July-December 2018 is the fifth report. In the reporting period, a total of 54 measures became due for implementation, out of which 10 (19%) were implemented, 33 (61%) were continuously implemented, 3 (5%) were partially implemented and 8 measures (15%) were not implemented. Chapter Total Due I CI PI NI Graphic view Chapter: 23 564 200 13 158 16 13 7% 79% 8% 6% 01- JUDICIARY 155 48 3 34 9 2 6% 71% 19% 4% 02- FIGHT AGAINST 146 67 3 57 5 2 5% 85% 7% 3% CORRUPTION 03- FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 243 75 4 62 2 7 6% 82% 3% 9% 04- COOPERATION WITH 20 10 3 5 0 2 30% 50% 20% NGO Operational document 62 54 10 33 3 8 19% 61% 5% 15% 01-Public procurement 6 6 1 4 0 1 16% 67% 17% 02-Privatisation 8 7 0 5 0 2 72% 28% 22% 56% 11% 11% 03-Urban planning 11 9 2 5 1 1 04-Education 9 7 0 6 0 1 86% 14% 05-Health care sector 12 11 5 2 2 2 46% 18% 18% 18% 06-Local self-government 11 9 0 8 0 1 89% 11% 40% 60% 07-Police 5 5 2 3 0 0 3 23: Judiciary and Fundamental Rights 1 JUDICIARY 1.1 INDEPENDENCE OF JUDICIARY 1.1.1 Recommendation: Montenegro needs to amend its Constitution in line with the recommendations of the Venice Commission and the European standards, in order to ensure the independence and accountability of the judiciary. The amendments, inter alia, should include the following issues: - At least 50% of the Judicial Council and the Prosecutorial Council members should come from the judiciary. These members should be elected by their peers who represent different levels of the judiciary, without any interference by the Parliament (other than purely declarative). - Prosecutors should not be elected by the Parliament. - The reasons for the dismissal of judges and prosecutors should be incorporated into the Constitution. No. Measure /Activity Responsible Deadline Status INDICATOR OF RESULT INDICATOR OF IMPACT authority 1.1.1.1 Amend the Constitution in the part governing the The I Amendments to the Constitution adopted Indicator 1: The judiciary is effectively judiciary in line with the opinion of the Venice Parliament governed by Constitutional principles in line Commission, particularly as regards: - composition of with European standards and EU acquis. the Judicial Council, - election of the President of the Overall, the quality and efficiency of the July 2013 Constitutional Law for the enforcement of the Supreme Court, - election of public prosecutors and judiciary is improving (Tool : third party Amendments to the Constitution adopted of the Supreme Public Prosecutor, - composition of reports) the Prosecutorial Council - reasons for dismissal of judges and public prosecutors; - composition and (12) 30 June 2018 (PI) method of election of judges of the Constitutional In its report for Montenegro for 2018, the Court. European Commission concluded that (12) 30 June 2018 [I] "Montenegro is moderately prepared for the application of the acquis and European (13) 31 December 2018 [I] standards in this area and that, overall, it made some progress". Regarding the functioning of the judiciary, the EC noted "the judicial system of Montenegro is moderately prepared”. In the reporting period, Montenegro has made some progress in meeting the recommendations for 4 strengthening the independence, professionalism and accountability of the judiciary." Regarding the efficiency of the judiciary, it has been noted that Montenegro generally has no significant
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Case Northeastern Montenegro
    Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 1(13) MOVEMENT POPULATION IN THE SECOND OF XX AND BEGINNING OF XXI CENTURY: THE CASE NORTHEASTERN MONTENEGRO Goran Rajovi ć, Jelisavka Bulatovi ć, Researchers College of Textile Design, Technology and Management, Belgrade, Serbia E-mail: [email protected] , [email protected] Phone: 0038161/19-24-850, 003861/ 3082651 ABSTRACT This paper analyzes population trends northeast of Montenegro in the second half of the twentieth and early twenty-first century. The population has increased in the period 1948- 2003 to 2.16%, but with a tendency to decline from 1981. The population in are period 1981- 2003, decreased by 14,674, or 21.16 %. Parameters of natural population indicate a negative trend. So the natural increase in 2003 in the municipality was Andrijevica - 4.6 ‰, in the municipality of Plav 4.21 ‰, and Berane 9.29 ‰, significantly lower than in the beginning of the seventies. Population migration indicates uneven density and population concentration. The existence of a large number of settlements up to 500 populations (81) is not suitable for modern flow to vital economic development of the region. KEYWORDS Northeastern Montenegro; Density of population; Natural change; Migration. Northeastern Montenegro covers an area of 1486 km² and the population census in 2003 there lived 54 658 inhabitants, or 36.8 in/ km². It covers three municipalities: Berane, Andrijevica and Plav. The paper provides a review and interpretation of the basic parameters of population trends northeastern of Montenegro in the second half of the twentieth and early twenty-first century. Unlike the nineties of the last century, the population of the region during the seventies, moving out to a much lesser extent, we can explain the material well-being of the former Yugoslavia.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio Economic Analysis of Northern Montenegrin Region
    SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO Podgorica, June 2008. FOUNDATION F OR THE DEVELOPMENT O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO (FORS) SOCIO -ECONOMIC ANLY S I S O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR : Veselin Šturanović STUDY REVIEWER S : Emil Kočan, Nebojsa Babovic, FORS Montenegro; Zoran Radic, CHF Montenegro IN S TITUTE F OR STRATEGIC STUDIE S AND PROGNO S E S ISSP’S AUTHOR S TEAM : mr Jadranka Kaluđerović mr Ana Krsmanović mr Gordana Radojević mr Ivana Vojinović Milica Daković Ivan Jovetic Milika Mirković Vojin Golubović Mirza Mulešković Marija Orlandić All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means wit- hout the prior written permission of FORS Montenegro. Published with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the CHF International, Community Revitalization through Democratic Action – Economy (CRDA-E) program. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for Interna- tional Development. For more information please contact FORS Montenegro by email at [email protected] or: FORS Montenegro, Berane FORS Montenegro, Podgorica Dušana Vujoševića Vaka Đurovića 84 84300, Berane, Montenegro 81000, Podgorica, Montenegro +382 51 235 977 +382 20 310 030 SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS: ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kolašin Turistički Vodič
    tourist guide turistički vodič www.kolasin.me BAKOVIĆA KLISURA MOJKOVAC 2 BAKOVIĆI DRIJENAK 2 ROGOBORE RADIGOJNO BABLJAK 2 BREZA Kolašin SELIŠTA BAŠANJE pješačke staze BRDO KOLAŠIN 1450 3 KOLAŠIN 1600 SCAN WITH QR hiking trails CODE READER POLJE Kolašin-Barutana-Kukunovac-Kolašin BOTANIČKA 1 BAŠTA Početak staze: 942 mnm Trail beginning: 942 m a.s.l. 1 Najviša tačka: 1311 m Highest Point: 1311 m 1 DULOVINE Ukupni uspon: 369 m Total ascent: 369 m 1 1 GORNJI PAŽANJ Dužina staze: 9.75 km Trail length: 9.75 km Vrijeme potrebno za turu: 3 h How long it takes: 3 h BARUTANA 1 VLADOŠ Kolašin-Radigojno-Bakovića klisura-Kolašin PODGORICA Početak staze: 942 mnm Trail beginning: 942 m a.s.l. 1 1 DURUTOVAC Najviša tačka: 998 m Highest Point: 998 m Ukupni uspon: 56 m 2 Total ascent: 56 m KUKUNOVAC Dužina staze: 8.9 km Trail length: 8.9 km Vrijeme potrebno za turu: 2 h How long it takes: 2 h Kolašin-Bašanje brdo-Kolašin Početak staze: 942 mnm Trail beginning: 942 m a.s.l. Najviša tačka: 1081 m Highest Point: 1081 m Ukupni uspon: 139 m 3 Total ascent: 139 m Dužina staze: 2,4 km Trail length: 2,4 km Vrijeme potrebno za turu: 1 h How long it takes: 1 h BAKOVIĆA KLISURA MOJKOVAC 2 BAKOVIĆI DRIJENAK 2 ROGOBORE RADIGOJNO BABLJAK 2 BREZA Kolašin SELIŠTA BAŠANJE pješačke staze BRDO KOLAŠIN 1450 3 KOLAŠIN 1600 hiking trails POLJE Kolašin-Barutana-Kukunovac-Kolašin BOTANIČKA 1 BAŠTA Početak staze: 942 mnm Trail beginning: 942 m a.s.l.
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia 22 April 2001
    CG/CP (8) 5 REV Standing Committee Report on the observation of the early parliamentary elections in Montenegro, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia 22 April 2001 Rapporteur : Mr Tomas JIRSA (Czech Republic) Adopted by the Standing Committee on 31 May 2001 --------------------------- At the invitation of Mr Svetozar Marovic, President of the Montenegrin Parliament, and of the Yugoslav authorities, through their Consul General in Strasbourg, the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe (CLRAE) was invited to observe the early parliamentary elections held on 22 April 2001. The elections were called by the President of the Republic of Montenegro on 20 February, following the People's Party's withdrawal from the governing coalition and the Montenegrin Parliament's decision to dissolve itself. At its meeting of 7 March 2001, the Bureau of the Congress decided to send an observer delegation comprising Mr Tomas JIRSA (Czech Republic, L, Head of the delegation), Mrs Ayse Bahar CEBI (Turkey, L), Mr Fabio PELLEGRINI (Italy, L), Mr Constantinos TATSIS (Greece, R) and Mrs Lea TOLONEN (Finland, R), accompanied by Mr Alessandro MANCINI and Miss Sylvie AFFHOLDER (Congress Secretariat). Meanwhile, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe had appointed six observers: Mr Andreas GROSS (Switzerland, SOC), Mrs Vera SQUARCIALUPI (Italy, SOC), Mr Lauri VAHTRE (Estonia, EPP), Mr Claude FREY (Switzerland, LDR), Mr Cevdet AKÇALI (Turkey, EGD) and Mr Pierre GOLDBERG (France, UEL), accompanied by three members of its Secretariat. The Council of Europe delegation worked closely with the election observation mission appointed by the OSCE/ODIHR and wishes to thank Mr Vulchanov, Head of the Mission, and his team for their assistance and logistical support.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case Northeastern Montenegro
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by InfinityPress Journal of Studies in Social Sciences ISSN 2201-4624 Volume 2 (2013), Number 1, 1-30 Analysis of Change in Population Structure: The Case Northeastern Montenegro Goran Rajović (Corresponding author) Street Vojvode Stepe No. 252, Beograd Jelisavka Bulatović College of Textile Design, Technology and Management, Street Starine Novaka No.20, Belgrade, Serbia Abstract: This paper analyzes changes in the demographic structure of population in northeastern Montenegro, in the example of the municipality Berane, Andrijevica and Plav. Population age structure is changing, and takes unfavorable characteristics, reduces the proportion of younger and increases the proportion of elderly population. Disturbed age structure has a reverse effect on the movement of the population (the size of reproductive contingent), but also to all other population structure (size of contingent employment, population, mandatory school contingent, relationship maintenance). Despite significant changes in the demographic structures of all northeastern Montenegro, retains the characteristics of ethnically very heterogeneous environment. Keywords: Northeastern Montenegro, population, population structure INTRODUCTION Question of the relationship between the economy and population can be approached from many sides, because of so much importance to attract the attention of many scientific disciplines. But, if the component is "population" in its demographic organic content, it is apparently possible to approach this issue as follows: from the standpoint 2 Journal of Studies in Social Sciences of economics, from the standpoint of science and interdisciplinary population - economic and demographic standpoint. Our interest here is not the first and the second approach, although of great theoretical and practical importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Grants Update (Montenegro), February – June 20151
    SMALL GRANTS UPDATE (MONTENEGRO), FEBRUARY – JUNE 20151 The implementation of the project activities in Montenegro is proceeding according to plan, although some delays were experienced in Bijelo Polje, where implementation could not start before the local government was cleared out of bankruptcy. Tivat local government organized an awareness raising campaign and identified premises for the new Information Center; Plav local government purchased and installed simultaneous translation equipment to be used during the municipal assembly sessions and has begun the translation of the relevant municipal documents. In addition, Kotor local government issued three magazines under the project and promotion activities are planned for the forthcoming period. JP Minority Project Secretariat has noted that in some cases (Kotor) the respective local NGOs are very much engaged in the planning and implementation of the small grants, and thus driving the process, and the respective local governments are taking a much more modest role. 1 Please note that the project implementation in all municipalities in Montenegro (except for Bijelo Polje) was delayed due to the unresolved issue of VAT eligibility. After failing in their efforts to exempt themselves from the VAT, the selected municipalities agreed to cover the VAT costs from their own funds. 1 Bijelo Polje - Local Self-Government Field: Culture Key minority engaged: Bosniaks The project aims to promote and affirm the culture and traditions of the Bosniak national minority with the active participation of civil servants and the local self-government bodies. The project will support scientific and expert meetings that deal with international and national mechanisms for the protection of national minorities and Bosniak contemporary literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Periodical Report Presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in Accordance with Article 15 of the Charter
    Strasbourg, 15 May 2014 MIN-LANG (2014) PR 6 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Third periodical report presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in accordance with Article 15 of the Charter MONTENEGRO Montenegro GOVERNMENT OF MONTENEGRO Ministry for Human and Minority Rights THIRD REPORT OF MONTENEGRO ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN CHARTER ON REGIONAL AND MINORITY LANGUAGES Podgorica, April 2014 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION ____________________________________________________________3 II BASIC DEMOGRAPHIC INDICATORS _________________________________6 III LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE PROTECTION OF MINORITIES IN MONTENEGRO______________________________________________________________10 1. Human rights and protection of minorities in the Constitution of Montenegro ___________________________________________________10 2. Special minority rights___________________________________________11 3. Legal framework ________________________________________________13 4. Institutional framework for protection of minority nations and other minority national communities in Montenegro_________19 5. Strategic framework of the policy for minority nations and other minority national communities__________________________23 IV THE LEVEL OF COMPLIANCE OF THE MONTENEGRIN LEGISLATION WITH THE EUROPEAN CHARTER ON REGIONAL AND MINORITY LANGUAGES _______________________________________________________________________________25 V IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN CHARTER ON REGIONAL AND MINORITY LANGUAGES ______________________________________________30
    [Show full text]
  • Government of Montenegro
    Government of Montenegro Ministry of European Integration Questionnaire Information requested by the European Commission to the Government of Montenegro for the preparation of the Opinion on the application of Montenegro for membership of the European Union I Democracy and the rule of law Minister: Gordana Djurovic Podgorica, December 2009 I Democracy and the rule of law 2 I Democracy and the rule of law TABLE OF CONTENTS POLITICAL CRITERIA....................................................................................................................5 I Democracy and the rule of law.....................................................................................................6 3 I Democracy and the rule of law 4 I Democracy and the rule of law POLITICAL CRITERIA 5 I Democracy and the rule of law I Democracy and the rule of law Constitution 1. Please provide a brief description of the constitutional and institutional situation in Montenegro. Montenegro, as the youngest member state of UN and other international, political, economic and other associations and integrations, adopted the new Constitution of Montenegro on 22 October 2007. Montenegro is an independent and sovereign state, with the republican form of government. Montenegro is a civil, democratic, ecological and the state of social justice, based on the rule of law. Bearer of sovereignty is the citizen with Montenegrin citizenship. The citizen shall exercise power directly and through the freely elected representatives. The power not stemming from the freely expressed will of the citizens in democratic election in accordance with the law, can neither be established nor recognised. The Constitution stipulates that the power shall be regulated following the principle of the division of powers into the legislative, executive and judicial. The legislative power shall be exercised by the Parliament, the executive power by the Government and the judicial by courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Assembly, Budget, General Information, Public Procurement, Public Discussions and Public Competitions
    1 TRANSPARENCY INDEX OF MONTENEGRIN MUNICIPALITIES Podgorica, 2020 TRANSPARENCY INDEX OF MONTENEGRIN MUNICIPALITIES Publisher: Centar za građansko obrazovanje (CGO) Editor: Daliborka Uljarević Lead author: Mira Popović Co-authors: Maja Marinović Ana Nenezić Research Associate: Vasilije Radulović Design and Production: Centar za građansko obrazovanje (CGO) Print: 170 primjeraka The report is part of the project “Let’s put corruption in the museum!” implemented by the Centre for Civic Education (CCE) in partnership with NGO Centre for Monitoring and Research (CeMI), NGO Bonum from Pljevlja, NGO UL-Info from Ulcinj and NGO Za Druga from Petrovac, in cooperation with the Ministry of Public Administration and the Agency for Prevention Corruption (APC), funded by the European Union with co-financing from the Ministry of Public Administration. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the CCE and CEMI and in no manner can it be interpreted as an official position of the European Union or the Ministry of Public Administration. SADRŽAJ Introduction 6 Methodology 7 General assessment of the state of transparency of municipalities in Montenegro 11 How transparent are Montenegrin municipalities? 16 • Andrijevica 17 • Bar 20 • Berane 23 • Bijelo Polje 26 • Budva 29 • Cetinje 32 • Danilovgrad 35 • Golubovci 38 • Gusinje 41 • Herceg Novi 44 • Kolašin 47 • Kotor 50 • Mojkovac 53 • Nikšić 56 • Petnjica 59 • Plav 62 • Pljevlja 65 • Plužine 68 • Podgorica 71 • Rožaje 74 • Šavnik 77 • Tivat 80 • Tuzi 83 • Ulcinj 86 • Žabljak 89 Research 92 Final remarks 101 6 INTRODUCTION Fight against corruption requires a multidisciplinary, continuous and multifaceted approach, and one of the preconditions is a high degree of transparency in the work of public sector bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Podgorica, 2015 2015
    UDK - 37 ISSN 0350 - 1094 2015 PODGORICA, 2015 EDUCATION VASPITANJE magazine for pedagogic theory and practice I OBRAZOVANJE Year XL, Annual No. 2, 2015 časopis za pedagošku teoriju i praksu UDK – 37, ISSN 0350 – 1094 Godina XL, godišnji broj 2, 2015 UDK – 37, ISSN 0350 – 1094 EDITORIAL BOARD mr Radule Novović, Editor in chief REDAKCIJA Institute for textbook mr Radule Novović, glavni urednik publishing and teaching aids Zavoda za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva Radovan Damjanović, Editor in charge Radovan Damjanović, odgovorni urednik prof. dr Ratko Đukanović, Member prof. dr Ratko Đukanović, član prof. dr Ana Pešikan, Faculty of prof. dr Ana Pešikan, Filozofski fakultet, Philosophy, Belgrade, Member Beograd, član prof. dr Božidar Šekularac, Member prof. dr Božidar Šekularac, član prof. mr Nataša Đurović, Member prof. mr Nataša Đurović, član Zorica Minić, Member Zorica Minić, član prof. dr Izedin Krnić, Member prof. dr Izedin Krnić, član Maja Malbaški, Member Maja Malbaški, član LECTOR LEKTOR Sanja Orlandić Sanja Orlandić TRANSLATOR PREVODILAC mr Radoslav Milošević – ATOS mr Radoslav Milošević – ATOS TECHNICAL SUPPORT KOMPJUTERSKA OBRADA Marko Lipovina Marko Lipovina COVERS KORICE Slobodan Vukićević Slobodan Vukićević PUBLISHER IZDAVAČ Institute for textbook Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva publishing and teaching aids Podgorica. Prvi broj časopisa „Vaspitanje i Podgorica. The „Education“ Magazine, obrazovanje“ je izašao 1975. godine. first published in 1975 Izlazi tromjesečno Published quarterly Tiraž 1000 Number of copies 1000
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro – Investment Prioritisation Framework Volume 1 – Main Report
    Consulting Services for Public Disclosure Authorized SUPPORT TO WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE DRINA RIVER BASIN PROJECT ID NO. 1099991 MONTENEGRO– INVESTMENT PRIORITISATION FRAMEWORK Public Disclosure Authorized VOLUME 1 – MAIN REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized November 2017 Consulting Services for SUPPORT TO WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE DRINA RIVER BASIN PROJECT ID NO. 1099991 MONTENEGRO – INVESTMENT PRIORITISATION FRAMEWORK VOLUME 1 – MAIN REPORT November 2017 PROJECT NO. A038803 DOCUMENT NO. 1 VERSION C DATE OF ISSUE November 2017 PREPARED all authors and institutions as in inception report CHECKED Nadja Zeleznik, REC APPROVED Roar Selmer Solland, COWI Consulting Services for SUPPORT TO WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE DRINA RIVER BASIN PROJECT ID NO. 1099991 This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Western Balkans Joint Fund under the Western Balkans Investment Framework. The views expressed herein are those of authors and can therefore in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the Contributors to the European Western Balkans Joint Fund or the EBRD and the EIB, as co‐managers of the European Western Balkans Joint Fund. World Bank Montenegro – Investment Prioritisation Framework Support to Water Resources Management in the Drina River Basin i Table of Contents Page No Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... viii Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Accommodation in Andrijevica, Plav, Berane and Rozaje
    Hotels in Andrijevica, Plav, Berane and Rozaje - Montenegro Travel agency „Adria Line”, 13 Jul 1, 85310 Budva, Montenegro Tel: +382 (0)119 110, +382 (0)67 733 177, Fax: +382 (0)33 402 115 E-mail: [email protected], Web: www.adrialine.me Hotels in Andrijevica, Plav, Berane and Rozaje - Montenegro Andrijevica Andrijevica is located in the north-eastern corner of Montenegro, at the confluence of the Rivers Zlorecica and Lim. Surrounded by Komovi, Bjelasica and Prokletije, this distinctly mountainous municipality, with more than five thousand inhabitants, is situated at an altitude of 740 metres above sea level. Whether you are a fan of mountaineering, cycling, fishing or extreme sports, you are in the right place. You will be able to enjoy numerous and different trails, rivers teeming with trout, huchen and grayling, the wild cliffs and white waters of the River Lim’s tributaries, as well as attractive cycling trails through the forest. What makes Andrijevica special is the fact that it is located right on the intersection, between the great mountain ranges - Prokletije, Komovi and Bjelasica. Komovi have always been an inspiration to poets and a challenge to mountaineers and botanists. Thrilled by the peaks and pastures, nature lovers had good reason to name it "the emperor of mountains and a divine giant". You can still find authentic Vasojevici-style houses here that preserve the rhythm of the former highland life. You should not pass up the opportunity to see some of the remaining summer pastures that are slowly surrendering to the wondrous cruelty of the mountain and fading away from its slopes.
    [Show full text]