THE MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION SECRETARIAT
Flood Risk Assessment in the Nam Mae Kok basin, Thailand
The Flood Management and Mitigation Programme, Component 2: Structural Measures & Flood Proofing in the Lower Mekong Basin
December 2009 Draft Final Report, Volume 6A
- HASKONING NEDERLAND B.V.
- UNESCO IHE
Guide to the reporting structure of the Flood Management and Mitigation Programme - Component 2, Structural Measures and Flood Proofing
Component 2 on Structural Measures and Flood Proofing of the Mekong River Commission's Flood Management and Mitigation Programme was implemented from September 2007 till January 2010 under a consultancy services contract between MRCS and Royal Haskoning in association with Deltares and Unesco-IHE. The Implementation was in three Stages, an Inception Phase, and two implementation Stages. During each stage a series of outputs were delivered and discussed with the MRC, the National Mekong Committees and line agencies of the four MRC member countries. A part of Component 2 - on 'Roads and Floods' - was implemented by the Delft Cluster under a separate contract with MRC.
The consultancy services contract for Component 2 specifies in general terms that, in addition to a Final Report, four main products are to be delivered. Hence, the reports produced at the end of Component 2 are structured as follows:
- Volume 1
- Final Report
Volume 2
Volume 2A Volume 2B Volume 2C Volume 2D
Characteristics of Flooding in the Lower Mekong Basin:
Hydrological and Flood Hazard in the Lower Mekong Basin; Hydrological and Flood Hazard in Focal Areas; Flood Damages, Benefits and Flood Risk in Focal Areas, and Strategic Directions for Integrated Flood Risk management in Focal Areas.
Volume 3
Volume 3A Volume 3B
Best Practice Guidelines for Integrated Flood Risk Management
Best Practice Guidelines for Flood Risk Assessment; Best Practice Guidelines for Integrated Flood Risk Management Planning and Impact Evaluation;
Volume 3C Volume 3D
Best Practice Guidelines for Structural Measures and Flood Proofing; Best Practice Guidelines for Integrated Flood Risk Management in Basin Development Planning, and
- Volume 3E
- Best Practice Guidelines for the Integrated Planning and Design of
Economically Sound and Environmentally Friendly Roads in the Mekong Floodplains of Cambodia and Vietnam1
Volume 4 Volume 5
Project development and Implementation Plan Capacity Building and Training Plan
Demonstration Projects
Component 2 prepared five Demonstration Projects which have been reported separate from the main products:
Volume 6A Volume 6B
Flood Risk Assessment in the Nam Mae Kok basin, Thailand; Integrated Flood Risk Management Plan for the Lower Xe Bangfai basin, Lao PDR;
- Volume 6C
- Integrated Flood Risk Management Plan for the West Bassac area,
Cambodia;
Volume 6D Volume 6E
Flood Protection Criteria for the Mekong Delta, Vietnam Flood Risk Management in the Border Zone between Cambodia and Vietnam
The underlying report is Volume 6A of the above series.
1
Developed by the Delft Cluster
MRC Flood Management and Mitigation Programme Component 2: Structural Measures and Flood Proofing
Summary
This report presents the findings of the FMMP-C2 Demonstration Project that aims to assist Thailand in Flood Risk Assessment in the Nam Mae Kok basin in Chieng Rai province in Thailand.
Based on the analyses presented in the report the following conclusions can be drawn.
Flood prone area in the Nam Mae Kok basin comprise:
Valley of Nam Mae Fang Chiang Rai Province, and Mouth of Nam Mae Kok.
Floods in the upper reaches of the tributaries are flashy. Flashiness decreases further downstream in the Chiang Rai region. In the lower 20-25 km of the Nam Mae Kok near the mouth the flood levels are affected by backwater from the Mekong.
Extreme value distributions of peak flows and the possible range of flood volumes can be used for assessment of the hydrological hazard in the Chiang Rai region regarding peak levels and flood duration. A bivariate distribution for the river mouth.
Data availability and validation
Water level and discharge series of sufficient length are available to asses the hydrological hazard in the Chiang Rai region and near the Nam Mae Kok mouth.
Validation of hydrological data does not appear to be common practice according to sources at the data collecting agencies.
The applied stage-discharge relations for the stations on Nam Mae Kok and tributaries varied strongly from year to year. The number of discharge measurement taken each year suggest that the changes are due to morphological developments in the station controls. Some re-settings of gauges to different gauge zeros seem to have occurred, but have not been recorded.
Whereas the rainfall records are mutually consistent, the discharge series are not. Distinct changes in the records are apparent in the series of Ban Pang Na Kham in the period 1988- 1994, whereas the series of Ban Mae Phaeng is inconsistent with the area adjusted sum of the Kok and Lao flows for almost its entire record.
As a consequence of the Ban Mae Phaeng inconsistency, the SWAT based lateral inflows are overestimated by a factor 2.3.
Hydrological characteristics
Annual rainfall in the Kok basin is largest towards the river mouth (1,700 mm) with lower values of 1,300 to 1,400 mm in the upper reaches of the Nam Mae Kok and the Nam Mae Fang. Rainfall is highest in the months July-September
Evaporation peaks in April-May. Annual totals vary from 1,300 to 1,500 mm. It exceeds rainfall in the period November – April.
The annual average flow volume of the Nam Mae Kok at mouth is about 5.24 BCM. Runoff of Nam Mae Kok at Chiang Rai per unit area is twice the runoff of the Nam Mae Lao. At Chiang Rai the runoff is highest in the months August and September, whereas in Nam Mae Lao September is the month with the largest flow volume.
Stage 2
‐ S i ‐
December 2009
Nam Mae Kok Flood Risk Assessment
MRC Flood Management and Mitigation Programme Component 2: Structural Measures and Flood Proofing
The regime of the Nam Mae Kok is a few weeks in spate relative to the Mekong regime.
Hydrological hazard
The hydrological hazard expressed as extreme discharge for selected return periods with a full range of flood volumes have been determined for the Nam Mae Kok at Ban Pong Na Kham, the Nam Mae Lao at Ban Pong Pu Fuang and the Nam Mae Kok downstream of the Loa confluence. Generally, the GEV fits best to the data, but due to the limited data length the EV1 is not rejected as an alternative.
The annual discharge peaks on the Nam Mae Kok at Ban Pong Na Kham and the Nam Mae Lao at Ban Pong Pu Fuang do generally not occur at the same time. This should be included in the selected boundary conditions for flood hazard assessment with the hydraulic model.
EV1 and GEV distributions fit well to the marginal distributions of observed annual maximum flood peaks and annual flood volumes in the Mekong at Chiang Saen.
The bivariate distribution of annual flood peaks and flood volumes in the Mekong at Chiang Saen can be described by regression equations and GEV-distributions for the regression residuals.
The observed distribution of annual flood volumes in the Nam Mae Kok is well described by an EV-1-distribution.
The bivariate distribution of annual flood peaks and flood volumes in the Nam Mae Kok at mouth can be described by regression equations and GEV-distributions for the regression residuals.
Neither the peak discharges nor the annual flood volumes in the Mekong versus the Nam Mae Kok show significant correlation.
The annual maximum discharges on the Mekong occur on average about two weeks earlier than the annual peaks on the Nam Mae Kok.
Flood hazard
The flooding around Chiang Rai city is complex and its extent is preferably modelled with a 1D2D hydraulic model.
The existing hydraulic model of the Nam Mae Kok needs to be adjusted in the cross-sections particularly for the Lao and recalibrated using appropriate lateral inflows for reliable flood hazard assessment.
A full range of hydrographs (flood peaks and related range of flood volumes) have been developed for flood hazard computations around Chiang Rai city.
Some 150 combinations of water level hydrographs for the Mekong at Sop Kok and discharge hydrographs of the Nam Mae Kok at mouth will be required for flood simulation near the river mouth as input to the Monte Carlo technique to establish the flood maps of required return periods.
Flood damages have been assessed through a data collection and social surveys in 12 communes. Results show that damages have decreased considerably over the past years, likely as a result of the flood control measures that have been implemented in the area at Chiang Rai, but it is also possible that lower floods occurred in the past years. A
- Stage 2
- ‐ S ii ‐
- December 2009
Nam Mae Kok Flood Risk Assessment
MRC Flood Management and Mitigation Programme Component 2: Structural Measures and Flood Proofing
proper risk assessment could not be established due to issues with the hydraulic model that makes it unsuitable for simulations at this point in time. Flood damage probability curves are presented but should be interpreted with gat caution because these are indicative only, due to lack of hydraulic simulation results.
However, the methodologies to arrive at flood risk assessment have been presented in the report and are based on the Best Practice Guidelines for Flood Risk Assessment (Volume3A)
This report is presented in two distinct parts, Part A presents the Flood Hazard
Assessment and Part B presents the Flood Damage and Flood Risk Assessment and the Social Dimensions of Flooding as perceived by the local population.
- Stage 2
- ‐ S iii ‐
- December 2009
Nam Mae Kok Flood Risk Assessment MRC Flood Management and Mitigation Programme Component 2: Structural Measures and Flood Proofing
Introduction Background
In the Stage 1 Workshop of the Component 2 of the Flood Management and Mitigation Program (FMMP-C2), held in Ho Chi Minh City on 25 September, 2008, it was agreed that the assessment of flood risks in the Lower Nam Mae Kok basin in Thailand will be one of the Demonstration Projects (DP) during the Stage 2 Implementation of the FMMP-C2.
The scope of this project was presented in the Workshop as follows: 1. The results of the socio-economic surveys will be used for the elaboration of damage curves for the urban and rural districts in the Province;
2. Hazard maps will be prepared with the help of hydraulic model under preparation; 3. Flood risk maps will be prepared; 4. Measures for flood risk reduction will be formulated. Regarding the implementation of this project it was agreed that a "Working-group" will be established that will have a dual function, i.e.
1. Provide guidance to the FMMP-C2 consultants in the implementation of the
Demonstration project, especially regarding policy, strategy and institutional issues.
2. Participate in technical sessions that allow for the transfer of technology from the side of the consultants to the technical working-group members.
The Demonstration Projects are also meant to apply best practice guidelines that are developed under the FMMP-C2. The following best practice guidelines are intended to be used in the implementation of this Demonstration Project::
1. Guidelines for Flood Risk Assessment 2. Guidelines for IFRM Planning and Impact Evaluation.
Structure of the Report
This report is presented in two distinct parts, Part A presents the Flood Hazard
Assessment and Part B presents the Flood Damage and Flood Risk Assessment and the Social Dimensions of Flooding as perceived by the local population.
Stage 2
‐ i‐
December 2009
Nam Mae Kok Flood Risk Assessment MRC Flood Management and Mitigation Programme Component 2: Structural Measures and Flood Proofing
Abbreviations and Acronyms
ADB
Asian Development Bank
asml BDP DEM DSF
Above mean sea level Basin Development Plan Programme Digital Elevation Model Decision Support Framework
DTM
Digital Terrain Model
DWR EIA FMM FFMP FMMP-C1
Department of Water Resources in Thailand Environmental Impact Assessment Flood Management and Mitigation Flood Management and Mitigation Programme Component 1 of the MRC FMMP: Flood Warning and Preparedness
FMMP-C2 FMMP-C3 FMMP-C4
Component 2 of the MRC FMMP: Structural Measures and Flood Proofing Component 3 of MRC FMMP: Mediation of Trans-boundary Flood Issues Component 4 of the MRC FMMP: Flood Emergency Management Strengthening
FMMP-C5 FRM
Component 5 of the MRC FMMP: Land Management Flood Risk Management
GEV
Generalised Extreme value
GIS
Geographic Information System Integrated Flood Risk Management Information and Knowledge Management Programme of the MRC Integrated Water Resources Management Korea International Cooperation Agency Lower Mekong Basin
IFRM IKMP IWRM KOICA LMB MRC
Mekong River Commission
MRCS NGO NMC
Mekong River Commission Secretariat Non Government Organisation National Mekong Committee
POR
Plain of Reed
PR
Provincial Road
ProDIP RNE
Project Development and Implementation Plan Royal Netherlands Embassy
TCEV TOR
Two Component Extreme Value Terms of Reference Water Utilization Programme of MRC
WUP WUP-A WWF 1D / 2D / 3D
WUP Basin Modelling and Knowledge Base Project World Wildlife Fund
One Dimensional / Two Dimensional / Three Dimensional
Stage 2
‐ iii‐
December 2009
Nam Mae Kok Flood Risk Assessment
MRC Flood Management and Mitigation Programme Component 2: Structural Measures and Flood Proofing
IFRM Glossary
Damage curve
The functional relation between inundation characteristics (depth, duration, flow velocity) and damage for a certain category of elements at risk.
Direct damage
All harm which relates to the immediate physical contact of flood water to people, property and the environment. This includes, for example, damage to buildings, economic assets, loss of standing crops and livestock, loss of human life, immediate health impacts and loss of ecological goods.
Exposure
The people, assets and activities that are threatened by a flood hazard.
Flood control Flood damage
A structural intervention to reduce the flood hazard. Damage to people, property and the environment caused by a flood. This damage refers to direct as well as indirect damage.
Flood damage risk (= Flood risk)
The combination or product of the probability of the flood hazard and the possible damage that it may cause. This risk
can also be expressed as the average annual possible damage.
Flood hazard
A flood that potentially may result in damage. A hazard does not necessarily lead to damage.
Flood hazard map Flood proofing
Map with the predicted or documented extent / depth / velocity of flooding with an indication of the flood probability.
A process for preventing or reducing flood damages to infrastructural works, buildings and/or the contents of buildings located in flood hazard areas.
Flood risk
Comprehensive activity involving risk analysis, and
management
identification and implementation of risk mitigation measures.
Flood risk management measures
Actions that are taken to reduce the probability of flooding or the possible damages due to flooding or both.
Flood risk map
Map with the predicted extent of different levels / classes of
average annual possible damage.
Hydrological hazard Indirect damage
A hydrological event (discharge) that may result in flooding. All damage which relate to the disruption of economic activity and services due to flooding.
Integrated flood risk management
The approach to Flood Risk Management that embraces the full chain of a meteorological hazard leading to flood damages and considers combinations of structural and non structural solutions to reduce that damage.
Stage 2
‐ iv‐
December 2009
Nam Mae Kok Flood Risk Assessment
MRC Flood Management and Mitigation Programme Component 2: Structural Measures and Flood Proofing
Meteorological hazard
A meteorological event (storm) that may result in a hydrological hazard and, eventually, in flooding
Resilience
The ability of a system / community / society to cope with the damaging effect of floods
Susceptibility
The opposite of resilience, that is to say the inability of a system / community / society to cope with the damaging effect of floods
Vulnerability
The potential damage that flooding may cause to people, property and the environment
Stage 2
‐ v‐
December 2009
Nam Mae Kok Flood Risk Assessment
MRC Flood Management and Mitigation Programme Component 2: Structural Measures and Flood Proofing
Part A Flood Hazard Assessment
- Stage 2
- - i -
July 2009
Nam Mae Kok Flood Risk Assessment
MRC Flood Management and Mitigation Programme Component 2: Structural Measures and Flood Proofing
Contents
12
Introduction...............................................................................................................1 Flood hazard assessment procedures ......................................................................3
2.1 2.2
General...........................................................................................................3 Outline of procedures.....................................................................................3 2.2.1 Tributary floods ................................................................................3 2.2.2 Combined floods...............................................................................3
- 3
- Basin description.......................................................................................................5
3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6
General...........................................................................................................5 Basin description............................................................................................5 Problem description.......................................................................................8 Hydrological data requirement ....................................................................12 Hydrological network and data availability.................................................13 Hydrological characteristics.........................................................................16 3.6.1 Rainfall ...........................................................................................16 3.6.2 Evaporation.....................................................................................17 3.6.3 Water levels and stage-discharge relations .....................................18 3.6.4 Discharges.......................................................................................19
- 4
- Hydrological hazard ...............................................................................................24
4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5
General.........................................................................................................24 Nam Mae Kok at Ban Pong Na Kham.........................................................24 Nam Mae Lao at Ban Pong Pu Fuang..........................................................30 Nam Mae Kok d/s Nam Mae Lao confluence..............................................35 Mekong - Nam Mae Kok confluence...........................................................40 4.5.1 Mekong at Chiang Saen..................................................................40 4.5.2 Discharge rating Sop Kok...............................................................44 4.5.3 Nam Mae Kok at mouth..................................................................44 4.5.4 Correlation between flood peaks and volumes in Nam Mae
Kok and Mekong ............................................................................46