DOCSLIB.ORG

1. Craig Prescott

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1. Craig Prescott Title Page ENHANCING THE METHODOLOGY OF FORMAL CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE IN THE UK A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2014 CRAIG PRESCOTT SCHOOL OF LAW Contents Title Page 1 Contents 2 Table of Abbreviations 5 Abstract 6 Declaration 7 Copyright Statement 8 Acknowledgements 9 Introduction 10 1. ‘Constitutional Unsettlement’ 11 2. Focus on Procedures 18 3. Outline of the Thesis 24 Chapter 1 - Definitions 26 1. ‘Constitutional’ 26 2. ‘Change’ 34 3. ‘Constitutional Change’ 36 4. Summary 43 Chapter 2 - The Limits of Formal Constitutional Change: Pulling Iraq Up By Its Bootstraps 44 1. What Are Constitutional Conventions? 45 Page "2 2. Commons Approval of Military Action 48 3. Conclusion 59 Chapter 3 - The Whitehall Machinery 61 1. Introduction 61 2. Before 1997 and New Labour 66 3. Department for Constitutional Affairs 73 4. The Coalition and the Cabinet Office 77 5. Where Next? 82 6. Conclusion 92 Chapter 4 - The Politics of Constitutional Change 93 1. Cross-Party Co-operation 93 2. Coalition Negotiations 95 3. Presentation of Policy by the Coalition 104 4. Lack of Consistent Process 109 Chapter 5 - Parliament 114 1. Legislative and Regulatory Reform Act 2006 119 2. Constitutional Reform Act 2005 133 3. Combining Expertise With Scrutiny 143 4. Conclusion 156 Chapter 6 - The Use of Referendums in the Page "3 UK 161 1. The Benefits of Referendums 163 2. Referendums and Constitutional Change 167 3. Referendums In Practice 174 4. Mandatory Referendums? 197 5. Conclusion 205 Chapter 7 - The Referendum Process 208 1. Initiating the Referendum Process 211 2. The Issue-Framing Stage 222 3. Regulation of Campaigning at Referendums 246 4. Conclusion 251 Conclusion - The Last Chance for the Uncodified Constitution? 255 Appendix 1 - Draft Bills with Constitutional Implications Since 1997 262 Appendix 2 - Results of Referendums 264 Bibliography 267 Word Count: 96,764# Page "4 Table of Abbreviations AV Alternative Vote CUP Cambridge University Press CLJ Cambridge Law Journal EU European Union FPTP First Past The Post IPSA Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority LS Legal Studies LQR Law Quarterly Review MLR Modern Law Review NLJ New Law Journal NHS National Health Service NILQ Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly OUP Oxford University Press PL Public Law Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act PPERA 2000 2000 STV Single Transferrable Vote SNP Scottish Nationalist Party TEU Treaty on European Union UK Const. L. Blog United Kingdom Constitutional Law Association Blog UKIP United Kingdom Independence Party Unless otherwise stated, throughout the thesis the following references refer to these reference books. ‘British Political Facts 1832-2012’ refers to Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher (eds) British Electoral Facts 1832-2012 (Biteback 2012) ‘Conservative Party Manifestos 1900-1997’ refers to Iain Dale (ed), Conservative Party Manifestos 1900-1997 (Routledge 2000) ‘Erskine May’ refers to Sir Malcolm Jack (ed) Erskine May: Parliamentary Practice (24th ed, LexisNexis 2011) ‘Labour Party Manifestos 1900-1997’ refers to Iain Dale (ed), Labour Party Manifestos 1900-1997 (Routledge 2000) ‘Liberal Party Manifestos 1900-1997’ refers to Iain Dale (ed), Liberal Party Manifestos 1900-1997 (Routledge 2000)# Page "5 Abstract The University of Manchester Craig Prescott Doctor of Philosophy Enhancing the Methodology of Formal Constitutional Change in the UK Friday, 5th September 2014 Since 1997, the UK constitution has undergone a transformation. This has since become a rolling process which shows little sign of abating. However, some of this constitutional change has been criticised for being rushed, piecemeal and with little consideration of the broader constitution. Yet, despite these criticisms, the underlying methodology of constitutional change has not been discussed in any great detail. This thesis, focusing on formal constitutional change, argues that the methodology to deliver that change should be enhanced to address these concerns. After establishing the limits of formal constitutional change, this thesis then considers how constitutional issues are approached within government and suggests that a Department of Legal Affairs would improve the preparation of proposed changes before being presented to Parliament. The politics of constitutional change are then analysed, with a particular focus on the process of coalition negotiations, which has become a new part of the methodology. The parliamentary process is considered by analysing the parliamentary passage of what became the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 and the Legislative and Regulatory Reform Act 2006. Recent changes to parliamentary procedure have allowed Parliament to scrutinise constitutional legislation more effectively, although there are still areas for significant improvement, particularly during the Committee Stage in the House of Commons. The thesis then considers the role of referendums and establishes when a referendum is required either as a matter of law or convention. The thesis then shows how procedural innovations such as the constitutional conventions in Australia and Ireland or the citizens’ assemblies in British Columbia and Ontario could be used in the UK. Also, as any recommendations of a constitutional convention or a citizens’ assembly are usually put to the rest of the electorate at a referendum, the links between a convention or assembly and the referendum process are discussed. Taken together, these enhancements to discrete aspects of the methodology of constitutional change should ensure that changes are more considered and allow for a more a stable constitutional settlement.# Page "6 Declaration No portion of the work referred to in the thesis has been submitted in support of an application for another degree or qualification of this or any other university or other institute of learning. Page "7 Copyright Statement The author of this thesis (including any appendices and/or schedules to this thesis) owns certain copyright or related rights in it (the “Copyright”) and s/he has given The University of Manchester certain rights to use such Copyright, including for administrative purposes. Copies of this thesis, either in full or in extracts and whether in hard or electronic copy, may be made only in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended) and regulations issued under it or, where appropriate, in accordance with licensing agreements which the University has from time to time. This page must form part of any such copies made. The ownership of certain Copyright, patents, designs, trade marks and other intellectual property (the “Intellectual Property”) and any reproductions of copyright works in the thesis, for example graphs and tables (“Reproductions”), which may be described in this thesis, may not be owned by the author and may be owned by third parties. Such Intellectual Property and Reproductions cannot and must not be made available for use without the prior written permission of the owner(s) of the relevant Intellectual Property and/or Reproductions. Further information on the conditions under which disclosure, publication and commercialisation of this thesis, the Copyright and any Intellectual Property and/or Reproductions described in it may take place is available in the University IP Policy (see http://documents.manchester.ac.uk/DocuInfo.aspx? DocID=487), in any relevant Thesis restriction declarations deposited in the University Library, The University Library’s regulations (see http:// www.manchester.ac.uk/library/aboutus/regulations) and in The University’s policy on Presentation of Theses.# Page "8 Acknowledgements Firstly, I must thank my supervisor, Professor Rodney Brazier for his support during the four years it has taken to complete this project. This thesis is immeasurably better for his guiding hand. I must also thank the broader Public Law community both within Manchester and beyond for creating a stimulating atmosphere within which to conduct research. In particular thanks to fellow PhD students Ben Adamson and Mark Turner for always being available to run ideas past and discuss how the latest political developments affects my thesis. I’d like to thank Jennifer Thorne, Adele Tyler and Justin Sham, Olivia and Patrick Houlihan, Zena Sorrmally and Steffen Bolwig for being such splendid hosts during my frequent stays in London for teaching and research over the past four years. Finally, I must thank my parents for their support during the last four years. This thesis considers the law and the general situation as it stood on 31st May 2014. All internet links provided were last accessed on 9th September 2014.# Page "9 Introduction ‘All I can see in the community in which I live is a considerable disagreement about the controversial issues of the day and this is not surprising as those issues would not be controversial if there were agreement’. John Griffith1 ‘Process is critical in terms of upholding, and being seen to uphold, constitutional values: particularly those of democratic involvement and transparency in the policy-making process. Moreover, we believe that a proper process is the foundation upon which successful policy is built: a lack of proper process makes an ineffective outcome more likely.’ House of Lords Constitution Committee2 ‘Over the past ten years or so, process has been a constant problem in constitutional reform’. Robert Blackburn3 ‘We have no proper mechanism for constitutional change’. Sir John Baker4 ‘Perhaps
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Armed Forces Bill 2021 Summary
    Headline can be Armedon three Forces lines Bill 2021 Title Summary Sub-title or short context to document Armed Forces Bill 2021 – Summary Background Since the Bill of Rights 1688, the legislation making the provision necessary for the Armed Forces to exist as a disciplined force has been subject to regular renewal by an Act of Parliament. The next renewal is needed by the end of 2021. The primary purpose of these Acts is to provide for the continuation for a further period of up to five years of the legislation enabling the Armed Forces to be recruited and maintained as disciplined bodies; that legislation is the Armed Forces Act 2006.The 2006 Act introduced a single system of law and the Service Justice System that applies to all Service personnel wherever in the world they are operating. The 2006 Act was implemented in 2009, replacing three separate Service Discipline Acts that dated back to the 1950s. The 2006 Act continues to serve our Armed Forces well and subsequent Armed Forces Acts have brought the 2006 Act up to date for the contemporary needs of the Services. In 2017, in preparation for this Bill, MOD commissioned an independent review of the Service Justice System (SJS) to ensure that it continues to be transparent, fair and efficient. The review made 79 recommendations for improvement and the Bill includes provision to implement a few of these which require primary legislation. In common with other five-yearly Bills, this one contains a small number of proposals which fall outside the ambit of Service discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Report
    HOUSE OF LORDS Procedure and Privileges Committee 2nd Report of Session 2021–22 Sitting times of Grand Committees Timetabling of Thursday debates Legislative Consent Motions for Lords Private Members’ Bills Ordered to be printed 29 July 2021 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords HL Paper 61 Procedure and Privileges Committee The Select Committee on Procedure and Privileges of the House is appointed each session to consider any proposals for alterations in the procedure of the House that may arise from time to time, and whether the standing orders require to be amended. Membership The members of the Procedure and Privileges Committee are: Lord Ashton of Hyde Lord McAvoy Lord Bew Lord McFall of Alcluith (Lord Speaker) Lord Eames Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall Baroness Evans of Bowes Park Lord Newby Lord Faulkner of Worcester Baroness Quin Lord Gardiner of Kimble (Chair) Baroness Smith of Basildon Lord Geddes Lord Stoneham of Droxford Baroness Harris of Richmond Baroness Thomas of Winchester Lord Judge Viscount Ullswater Lord Mancroft Alternate members: Baroness Browning (for backbench Conservative members) Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (for Crossbench members, other than the Convenor) Baroness Goudie (for backbench Labour members) Lord Alderdice (for backbench Liberal Democrat members) Lord Turnbull (for the Convenor) Declaration of interests A full list of Members’ interests can be found in the Register of Lords’ Interests: http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/standards-and-interests/register-of-lords- interests/ Publications
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Navy Police
    Royal Navy Police An inspection of the leadership of the Royal Navy Police in relation to its investigations July 2016 © HMIC 2016 ISBN: 978-1-78655-157-3 www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmic Contents Summary .................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 7 2. How effective is the overall strategic leadership and direction of the RNP, including the structures and mechanisms in support of these areas? .............. 10 What we were looking for ..................................................................................... 10 Findings ................................................................................................................ 10 3. How effective are the oversight, governance, monitoring and assessment arrangements within the RNP to ensure investigations are effective and kept free from improper interference? ........................................................................... 24 What we were looking for ..................................................................................... 24 Findings ................................................................................................................ 25 4. How well does the RNP use the National Intelligence Model in identifying strategic policing priorities that influence strategic planning and resourcing? 31 What we were looking for ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 'UK-USA Mutual Defence Agreement'. House Of
    UK-USA Mutual Defence Agreement Standard Note: SN/IA/3147 Last updated: 30 July 2004 Author: Paul Bowers International Affairs and Defence Section The Agreement between the UK and the USA for Cooperation in the Uses of Atomic Energy for Mutual Defence Purposes 1958, also known as the Mutual Defence Agreement (MDA), allows the USA and the UK to exchange nuclear materials, technology and information. It was the result of an amendment to post-War US non-proliferation law, which exempted allies that had made substantial progress in developing nuclear weapons from the general ban on exchanges that might lead to nuclear proliferation. The most important part of the MDA is time limited, and it is due to expire at the end of 2004. The UK and the USA have signed a new treaty to extend this deadline to 2014. This treaty must be ratified by both states. Critics argue that the MDA as amended contravenes the parties’ obligations under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons 1968 (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, or NPT). Further information on the NPT is in SN/IA/491, Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, 23 March 2004, at: http://hcl1.hclibrary.parliament.uk/notes/iads/snia-00491.pdf The procedure in the USA allows Congress an opportunity to veto the ratification. No such opportunity exists in the UK. This Note describes the MDA, its history, the current amending treaty, the procedures surrounding ratification of that treaty, and the concerns over its relationship with the NPT. Contents A. MDA 3 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Westminster Abbey a Service for the New Parliament
    St Margaret’s Church Westminster Abbey A Service for the New Parliament Wednesday 8th January 2020 9.30 am The whole of the church is served by a hearing loop. Users should turn the hearing aid to the setting marked T. Members of the congregation are kindly requested to refrain from using private cameras, video, or sound recording equipment. Please ensure that mobile telephones and other electronic devices are switched off. The service is conducted by The Very Reverend Dr David Hoyle, Dean of Westminster. The service is sung by the Choir of St Margaret’s Church, conducted by Greg Morris, Director of Music. The organ is played by Matthew Jorysz, Assistant Organist, Westminster Abbey. The organist plays: Meditation on Brother James’s Air Harold Darke (1888–1976) Dies sind die heil’gen zehn Gebot’ BWV 678 Johann Sebastian Bach (1685–1750) The Lord Speaker is received at the East Door. All stand as he is conducted to his seat, and then sit. The Speaker of the House of Commons is received at the East Door. All stand as he is conducted to his seat, and then sit. 2 O R D E R O F S E R V I C E All stand to sing THE HYMN E thou my vision, O Lord of my heart, B be all else but naught to me, save that thou art, be thou my best thought in the day and the night, both waking and sleeping, thy presence my light. Be thou my wisdom, be thou my true word, be thou ever with me, and I with thee, Lord; be thou my great Father, and I thy true son, be thou in me dwelling, and I with thee one.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming Bribery – a Consultation Paper
    The Law Commission Consultation Paper No 185 REFORMING BRIBERY A Consultation Paper The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Mr Justice Etherton, Chairman Mr Stuart Bridge Mr David Hertzell Professor Jeremy Horder Kenneth Parker QC Professor Martin Partington CBE is Special Consultant to the Law Commission responsible for housing law reform. The Chief Executive of the Law Commission is Steve Humphreys and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WC1N 2BQ. This consultation paper, completed on 31 October 2007, is circulated for comment and criticism only. It does not represent the final views of the Law Commission. The Law Commission would be grateful for comments on its proposals before 20 March 2008. Comments may be sent either – By post to: David Hughes Law Commission Conquest House 37-38 John Street Theobalds Road London WC1N 2BQ Tel: 020-7453-1212 Fax: 020-7453-1297 By email to: [email protected] It would be helpful if, where possible, comments sent by post could also be sent on disk, or by email to the above address, in any commonly used format. We will treat all responses as public documents in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act and we may attribute comments and include a list of all respondents' names in any final report we publish. Those who wish to submit a confidential response should contact the Commission before sending the response.
    [Show full text]
  • Cynulliad Cenedlaethol Cymru the National Assembly for Wales
    Cynulliad Cenedlaethol Cymru The National Assembly for Wales Y Pwyllgor Materion Cyfansoddiadol a Deddfwriaethol The Constitutional and Legislative Affairs Committee Dydd Llun, 11 Mawrth 2013 Monday, 11 March 2013 Cynnwys Contents Cyflwyniad, Ymddiheuriadau, Dirprwyon a Datganiadau o Fuddiant Introduction, Apologies, Substitutions and Declarations of Interest Offerynnau Nad Ydynt yn Cynnwys Unrhyw Faterion i’w Codi o dan Reolau Sefydlog Rhif 21.2 neu 21.3 Instruments that Raise no Reporting Issues under Standing Order Nos. 21.2 or 21.3 Offerynnau sy’n Cynnwys Materion i Gyflwyno Adroddiad arnynt i’r Cynulliad o dan Reolau Sefydlog Rhif 21.2 neu 21.3 Instruments that Raise Issues to be Reported to the Assembly under Standing Order Nos. 21.2 or 21.3 Cynnig o dan Reol Sefydlog Rhif 17.42 i Benderfynu Gwahardd y Cyhoedd o’r Cyfarfod Motion under Standing Order No. 17.42 to Resolve to Exclude the Public from the Meeting Tystiolaeth Ynghylch yr Ymchwiliad i Ddeddfu a’r Eglwys yng Nghymru Evidence in Relation to the Inquiry on Law Making and the Church in Wales Papurau i’w Nodi Papers to Note Cynnig o dan Reol Sefydlog Rhif 17.42(vi) i Benderfynu Gwahardd y Cyhoedd o’r Cyfarfod 11/03/2013 Motion under Standing Order No. 17.42(vi) to Resolve to Exclude the Public from the Meeting Cofnodir y trafodion yn yr iaith y llefarwyd hwy ynddi yn y pwyllgor. Yn ogystal, cynhwysir trawsgrifiad o’r cyfieithu ar y pryd. The proceedings are reported in the language in which they were spoken in the committee.
    [Show full text]
  • 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London
    09/27/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law View Online 1 Bradley AW, Ewing KD, Knight C. Constitutional and administrative law. Seventeenth edition. Harlow, England: : Pearson 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kcl/detail.action?docID=5418645 2 De Smith SA, Brazier R. Constitutional and administrative law. 8th ed. London: : Penguin 1998. 3 Turpin CC, Tomkins A. British government and the constitution: text and materials. 7th ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2011. http://kcl.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=775039 4 Le Sueur AP, Sunkin M, Murkens JE. Public law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016. 5 McEldowney JF. Public law. 3rd ed. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2002. 6 Phillips OH, Jackson P, Leopold P. O. Hood Phillips & Jackson’s constitutional and 1/58 09/27/21 6FFLK015: Advanced Constitutional Law | King's College London administrative law. 8th ed. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2001. 7 Loveland I. Constitutional law, administrative law, and human rights: a critical introduction. Eighth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2018. 8 Barnett H. Constitutional & administrative law. Twelfth edition. London: : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2017. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kcl/detail.action?docID=4917664 9 Jowell JL, Oliver D. The changing constitution. Eighth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2015. 10 Munro CR. Studies in constitutional law. 2nd ed. London: : Butterworths 1999. 11 Tomkins A. Public law. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2003. 12 Marshall G. Constitutional conventions: the rules and forms of political accountability. Oxford: : Clarendon 1984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198762027.001.0001 13 Griffith JAG, Ryle M, Wheeler-Booth MAJ, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Welsh Church
    (S.R. 0-- O. and S.I. Revised to December 31,1948) ---------~ ~--"------- WELSH CHURCH 1. Charter of Incorporation. 2. Burial Grounds (Commencemen~ 1 of Enactment). p. 220. 1. Charter of Incorporation ORDER IN COUNCIl, APPROVING DRAFT CHARTER UNDER SECTION 13 (2) OF THE WELSH CHURCH ACT, 1914 (4 & 5 GEO. 5. c. 91) INCORPORATING THE REPRESENTA­ TIVE BODY OF THE CHURCH IN WALES. 1919 No. 564 At the Court at Buckingham Palace, the 15th day of April, 1919. PRESENT, The King's Most Excellent Majesty in Gouncil. :\Vhereas there was this day read at the Board a Report of a Cmnmittee of the Lord.. of His Majesty's Most Honourable Privy C.ouncil, dated the 9th day of April, 1919, in the words following, VIZ.:- " Your Majesty having been pleased, by Your Order of the 10th day of February, 1919, to refer unto this Committee the humble Petition of The Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of St. Asaph, The Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of St. David's, 'rhe Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of Bangor, The Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of Llandaff, The Right Honourable Sir John Eldon Bankes, The Right Honourable Sir J ames Richard Atkin, Sir Owen Philipps, G.C.M.G., M.P., and The Honourable Sir John Sankey, G.B.E., praying that Your Majesty would be pleased, in exercise of Your Royal Preroga- 1,ive and of the power in that behalf contained in Section 13 (2) of the Welsh Church Act, 1914, to grant a Charter of Incorpora­ tion to the persons mentioned in the Second Schedule to the said Petition, and their successors, being the Representative Body of the Church in Wales under the provisions of the said Ad: "1'he Lords of the Committee, in obedience to Your Majesty's said Order of Reference, have taken the said Petition into consideration, and do this day agree humbly to report, as their opinion, to Your Majesty, that a Charter may be grant~~ by Your Majesty in terms of the Draft hereunto annexed.
    [Show full text]
  • Union with Scotland Act 1706
    Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Union with Scotland Act 1706. (See end of Document for details) Union with Scotland Act 1706 1706 CHAPTER 11 6 Ann X1 An Act for an Union of the Two Kingdoms of England and Scotland Most gracious Sovereign Recital of Articles of Union, dated 22d July, 5 Ann.; and of an Act of Parliament passed in Scotland, 16th January, 5 Ann. Whereas Articles of Union were agreed on the Twenty Second day of July in the Fifth year of Your Majesties reign by the Commissioners nominated on behalf of the Kingdom of England under Your Majesties Great Seal of England bearing date at Westminster the Tenth day of April then last past in pursuance of an Act of Parliament made in England in the Third year of Your Majesties reign and the Commissioners nominated on the behalf of the Kingdom of Scotland under Your Majesties Great Seal of Scotland bearing date the Twenty Seventh day of February in the Fourth year of Your Majesties Reign in pursuance of the Fourth Act of the Third Session of the present Parliament of Scotland to treat of and concerning an Union of the said Kingdoms And Whereas an Act hath passed in the Parliament of Scotland at Edinburgh the Sixteenth day of January in the Fifth year of Your Majesties reign wherein ’tis mentioned that the Estates of Parliament considering the said Articles of Union of the two Kingdoms had agreed to and approved of the said Articles of Union with some Additions and Explanations And that Your Majesty with Advice and Consent of the Estates
    [Show full text]
  • Redressing the Democratic Deficit in Treaty Law Making: (Re-)Establishing a Role for Parliament
    Redressing the Democratic Deficit in Treaty Law Making: (Re-)Establishing a Role for Parliament Joanna Harrington* Treaties are a significant source of law on a wide Les traités sont une importante source de droit dans range of subjects, but traditionally do not become domestic bien des domaines, mais ne s’intègrent traditionnellement law without national implementation. Nevertheless, the pas au système juridique intérieur sans une mise en œuvre legal character of treaty rules does place pressure on a nationale. Quoi qu’il en soit, le caractère juridique des state’s domestic institutions to ensure compliance. Given règles issues d’un traité exerce une certaine pression sur les the influence of treaty law, several Commonwealth states institutions nationales afin d’en assurer le respect. Étant provide a role for Parliament in treaty making even though donné l’influence du droit des traités, plusieurs états du at common law, the decision to make a treaty clearly rests Commonwealth accordent au Parlement un rôle dans with a government’s executive branch. Such reforms to the l’élaboration des traités, même si d’après le droit commun, treaty-making process attempt to address complaints that a la décision de rédiger un traité appartient clairement à “democratic deficit” exists, including an additional “federal l’exécutif du gouvernement. De telles réformes du democratic deficit” in federal states arising from the processus d’élaboration des traités tentent de répondre aux absence of a requirement for consultation between the critiques suivant lesquelles il existe un «déficit central and regional bodies. A review of the experiences in démocratique», en plus d’un «déficit démocratique fédéral» Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia leads to dans des états fédéraux, issu de l’absence d’une obligation several suggested reforms to secure greater legislative de consultation entre l’état central et les gouvernements scrutiny, enhance public awareness, and improve locaux.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Armed Forces (Offences and Jurisdiction) (Jersey) Law 201
    STATES OF JERSEY r DRAFT ARMED FORCES (OFFENCES AND JURISDICTION) (JERSEY) LAW 201- Lodged au Greffe on 6th June 2017 by the Minister for Home Affairs STATES GREFFE 2017 P.51 DRAFT ARMED FORCES (OFFENCES AND JURISDICTION) (JERSEY) LAW 201- European Convention on Human Rights In accordance with the provisions of Article 16 of the Human Rights (Jersey) Law 2000, the Minister for Home Affairs has made the following statement – In the view of the Minister for Home Affairs, the provisions of the Draft Armed Forces (Offences and Jurisdiction) (Jersey) Law 201- are compatible with the Convention Rights. Signed: Deputy K.L. Moore of St. Peter Minister for Home Affairs Dated: 2nd June 2017 Page - 3 ◊ P.51/2017 REPORT The proposed Armed Forces (Offences and Jurisdiction) (Jersey) Law 201- (“the proposed Law”) makes provision for the treatment of British armed forces and those visiting from other countries when they are in Jersey, particularly in relation to discipline and justice. The proposed Law also establishes appropriate powers for the Jersey police and courts in relation to deserters and others, creates civilian offences in relation to the armed forces, protects the pay and equipment of the armed forces from action in Jersey courts, and enables the States Assembly by Regulations to amend legislation to provide for the use of vehicles and roads by the armed forces. Background The United Kingdom Visiting Forces Act 1952 was introduced in order to make provision with respect to naval, military and air forces of other countries visiting the United Kingdom, and to provide for the apprehension and disposal of deserters or absentees without leave in the United Kingdom from the forces of such countries.
    [Show full text]