DOCSLIB.ORG

The Tokyo War Crimes Trial Before the International Military Tribunal for the Far East

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Tokyo War Crimes Trial Before the International Military Tribunal for the Far East CHAPTER 3 THE TOKYO WAR CRIMES TRIAL BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL FOR THE FAR EAST Carrington Williams A. PREFACE On April 29, 1946, the trial began of the Japanese military and civilian lead- ers accused by the Allies of instigating the Pacific part of World War 11. The Nuremberg Trial of the German wartime leaders was then in progress; this was to be its Japanese counterpart. Here were General Hideki Tojo and the men accused of executing the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor as well as British and Dutch mil- itary forces and possessions in the Far East. After a singularly brutal war, these leaders would at last face justice. Or so it was thought. The hostility towards them in the courtroom was almost tangible, accompa- nied by equal amounts of curiosity. There were 28 of them; they carried them- selves with dignity and apparent resignation. They did not seem to feel either resentment or sorry for themselves. The courtroom was clearly set up as stage for a major public event. It was tremendous with high ceilings, without air condi- tioning (Tokyo is hot), and large klieg lights beating down; the heat was oppres- sive. Suspense (and sweat) built up. After a lengthy wait, the marshall of the tribunal, a U.S. Army captain, brought down his gavel loudly, ordered all present to rise as the 11 justices from as many Allied countries walked solemnly to the bench and took their seats. The tribunal was thus opened for this historic under- taking. Little did they know that it would not be finished until November 12, 1948, two and a half years away. The trial took place in a large, hulking, ugly cement building, formerly the Japanese War Ministry at Ichigaya, Tokyo, with the interior improved by the Americans to accommodate a very large courtroom. Across from and facing the Justices were the 28 accused seated in the dock, guarded by very correct military police. It was a dramatic occasion, attended by a packed public gallery, numerous lawyers, interpreters, reporters, and newsreel cameras. 106 International Humanitarian Law: Origins The opening day must be seen in context with its larger components, all adding to the drama in their own ways. A few of these were: The City of Tokyo, two-thirds devastated by the 1945 fire-bombing raids by Army Air Corps B-29s flown from bases on Guam, Tinian, and Saipan in the Marianas Islands. Many factories were destroyed; wood and paper houses had burned liked tinder. In one raid alone some 100,000 people perished. There was similar or worse damage to other cities, particularly by atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The natural beauty of Japan's countryside, or wherever war had not intruded, including the majestic Mt. Fuji, very visible from Tokyo. The Japanese overall courtesy and their acceptance of devastating defeat by the Allies, as contrasted with their military's brutality towards Allied and even their own troops during the war. Japanese adulation of both General MacArthur and Emperor Hirohito; the public toughness and acceptance of near starvation, loss of homes, jobs and industries on a gigantic scale. Yet they viewed all of this stoically. They did not feel sorry for themselves, but worked hard to rectify their losses. The rapidity with which wartime hatred of Japanese, particularly by Americans, turned into surprise at their lack of resentment, their friendship, and even to admiration of them. B. INTRODUCTION This is a story untold for the last %-odd years, one which I never expected to write. But present concerns about terrorism, special military tribunals, and related problems persuade me that it is worth telling. Since the threats, the hor- rors, and the passions of World War IS are long behind us, the world is shaken by a different and perhaps more insidious danger: secret and overt terrorism. As a practicing lawyer at the trial and ever since, I try to distill what may make sense from that experience and its possible relevance to some problems today. In say- ing that, I do not consider the crimes of September 11, 2001, as war crimes because that is to grant them an undeserved dignity. To me they are mass mur- ders, nothing less. My recollection of the Tokyo War Crimes Trial started as a minor chapter in a family history begun years ago and still unfinished. By doing so I hope to raise some warnings as well as help correct some misconceptions about use of the atomic bomb against Japan in World War 11, the Emperor's role, and the Occupation of Japan. The prosecution dwelt on Japanese military atrocities, cov- ered up others, but also provided a valuable record of Japanese military and ter- ritorial expansion before and during World War IS. Despite criticism of the trial's legal and procedural errors for many years, I was primarily supportive of its objectives and originally of the results. We bestrode the world after helping our Allies to win World War 11; we promoted the .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Treatment of Prisoners of War by the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy Focusing on the Pacific War
    The Treatment of Prisoners of War by the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy Focusing on the Pacific War TACHIKAWA Kyoichi Abstract Why does the inhumane treatment of prisoners of war occur? What are the fundamental causes of this problem? In this article, the author looks at the principal examples of abuse inflicted on European and American prisoners by military and civilian personnel of the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy during the Pacific War to analyze the causes of abusive treatment of prisoners of war. In doing so, the author does not stop at simply attributing the causes to the perpetrators or to the prevailing condi- tions at the time, such as Japan’s deteriorating position in the war, but delves deeper into the issue of the abuse of prisoners of war as what he sees as a pathology that can occur at any time in military organizations. With this understanding, he attempts to examine the phenomenon from organizational and systemic viewpoints as well as from psychological and leadership perspectives. Introduction With the establishment of the Law Concerning the Treatment of Prisoners in the Event of Military Attacks or Imminent Ones (Law No. 117, 2004) on June 14, 2004, somewhat stringent procedures were finally established in Japan for the humane treatment of prisoners of war in the context of a system infrastructure. Yet a look at the world today shows that abusive treatment of prisoners of war persists. Indeed, the heinous abuse which took place at the former Abu Ghraib prison during the Iraq War is still fresh in our memories.
    [Show full text]
  • Mystery of Tojo's Remains Solved
    2A| SATURDAY, JUNE 19, 2021| TIMES RECORD NEWS Mystery of Tojo’s remains solved Secret mission scattered Luther Frierson wrote: “I certify that I received the remains, supervised cre- war criminal’s ashes mation, and personally scattered the ashes of the following executed war Mari Yamaguchi criminals at sea from an Eighth Army li- ASSOCIATED PRESS aison plane.” The entire operation was tense, with TOKYO – Until recently, the location U.S. officials extremely careful about of executed wartime Japanese Prime not leaving a single speck of ashes be- Minister Hideki Tojo’s remains was one hind, apparently to prevent them from of World War II’s biggest mysteries in being stolen by admiring ultra-nation- the nation he once led. alists, Takazawa said. Now, a Japanese university professor “In addition to their attempt to pre- revealed declassified U.S. military doc- vent the remains from being glorified, I uments that appear to hold the answer. think the U.S. military was adamant The documents show the cremated about not letting the remains return to ashes of Tojo, one of the masterminds of Japanese territory … as an ultimate hu- the Pearl Harbor attack, were scattered miliation,” Takazawa said. from a U.S. Army aircraft over the Pacif- The documents state that when the ic Ocean about 30 miles east of Yokoha- cremation was completed, the ovens ma, Japan’s second-largest city, south were “cleared of the remains in their en- of Tokyo. Former Japanese Prime Minister and military leader Hideki Tojo answers “not tirety.” It was a tension-filled, highly secre- guilty” during a war crimes trial in Tokyo in November 1948.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pacific War Crimes Trials: the Importance of the "Small Fry" Vs. the "Big Fish"
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons History Theses & Dissertations History Summer 2012 The aP cific aW r Crimes Trials: The mpI ortance of the "Small Fry" vs. the "Big Fish" Lisa Kelly Pennington Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_etds Part of the Asian History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Pennington, Lisa K.. "The aP cific aW r Crimes Trials: The mporI tance of the "Small Fry" vs. the "Big Fish"" (2012). Master of Arts (MA), thesis, History, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/rree-9829 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_etds/11 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the History at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PACIFIC WAR CRIMES TRIALS: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE "SMALL FRY" VS. THE "BIG FISH by Lisa Kelly Pennington B.A. May 2005, Old Dominion University A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS HISTORY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2012 Approved by: Maura Hametz (Director) Timothy Orr (Member) UMI Number: 1520410 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • In 1912 Emperor Meiji Died, and the Era of the Ruling Clique of Elder Statesmen (Genro) Was About to End
    In 1912 emperor Meiji died, and the era of the ruling clique of elder statesmen (genro) was about to end. During the era of the weak Emperor Taisho (1912-26), the political power shifted from the oligarchic clique (genro) to the parliament and the democratic parties. In the First World War, Japan joined the Allied powers, but played only a minor role in fighting German colonial forces in East Asia. On August 23, 1914, the Empire of Japan declared war on Germany, in part due to the Anglo-Japanese Alliance, and Japan became a member of the Entente powers. The Imperial Japanese Navy made a considerable contribution to the Allied war effort; however, the Imperial Japanese Army was more sympathetic to Germany, and aside from the seizure of Tsingtao, resisted attempts to become involved in combat. At the following Paris Peace Conference of 1919, Japan's proposal of amending a "racial equality clause" to the covenant of the League of Nations was rejected by the United States, Britain and Australia. Arrogance and racial discrimination towards the Japanese had plagued Japanese-Western relations since the forced opening of the country in the 1800s, and were again a major factor for the deterioration of relations in the decades preceeding World War 2. In 1924, for example, the US Congress passed the Exclusion Act that prohibited further immigration from Japan. Japanese intervention in Siberia and Russian Far East The overthrow of Tsar Nicholas II and the establishment of a Bolshevik government in Russia led to a separate peace with Germany and the collapse of the Eastern Front.
    [Show full text]
  • Kohima: Turning Occupational Japanese Interlude the Tides of War Hazards Walter Sim Monzurul Huq Robert Whiting 02 | FCCJ | AUGUST 2020
    The Magazine of The Foreign Correspondents’ Club of Japan August 2020 · Volume 52 · No. 8 RENOVATE AND RESET The 75th Anniversary of Peace in the Pacific Singapore’s Kohima: turning Occupational Japanese Interlude the tides of war Hazards Walter Sim Monzurul Huq Robert Whiting 02 | FCCJ | AUGUST 2020 In This Issue August 2020 · Volume 52 · No. 8 Contact the Editors Our August issue commemorates Japan’s acceptance of the Potsdam [email protected] Agreement in the “Jewel Voice Broadcast” (Gyokuon-hōsō) at noon on Publisher FCCJ August 15 1945. The Imperial line and Japan itself were renovated, then reset for the Cold War in Asia. Editor Peter O’Connor Designer Julio Kohji Shiiki, tokyographics.com Editorial Assistant Naomichi Iwamura Photo Coordinator Michiyo Kobayashi Publications Committee THE FRONT PAGE Peter O’Connor (Chair), Suvendrini Kakuchi, Monzurul Huq, Robert Whiting, David McNeill 03 From the President FCCJ BOARD OF DIRECTORS By Khaldon Azhari President Khaldon Azhari, PanOrient News 1st Vice President Monzurul Huq, Daily Prothom Alo 2nd Vice President Robert Whiting, Freelance FROM THE ARCHIVES Treasurer Mehdi Bassiri, Associate Member Secretary Takashi Kawachi, Freelance Directors-at-Large 04 James Abegglen, Mehdi Bassiri, Associate Member Peter O’Connor, Freelance Guru of Japanese Management Akihiko Tanabe, Associate Member Charles Pomeroy Abigail Leonard, Freelance Kanji Gregory Clark, Freelance Associate Kanji Vicki Beyer, Associate Member FEATURES Ex-officio Thomas Høy Davidsen, Jyllands-Posten FCCJ COMMITTEE CHAIRS Associate Members Liaison War Ends: The 75th Keiko Packard, Yuusuke Wada Compliance Kunio Hamada, Yoshio Murakami DeRoy Memorial Scholarship Abigail Leonard Anniversary Issue Entertainment Sandra Mori Exhibitions Bruce Osborn 05 Singapore’s Japanese interlude Film Karen Severns Finance Mehdi Bassiri Walter Sim Food & Beverage Robert Kirschenbaum, Peter R.
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese - American Relations, 1941: a Preface to Pearl Harbor
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 4-1966 Japanese - American Relations, 1941: A Preface to Pearl Harbor Edward Gorn Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Gorn, Edward, "Japanese - American Relations, 1941: A Preface to Pearl Harbor" (1966). Master's Theses. 3852. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3852 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JAPANESE - AMERICAN RELATIONS,- 1941: A PREF ACE TO PEARL HARBOR by Edward Gorn A thesis presented to the Faculty of the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Arts Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan April 1966 PREFACE There are as many interpretations as there are writers on the positions of American foreign policy during the diplomatic negotia­ tions with Japan in 1941. Hi.storians supporting President Roosevelt's 1 position tend to blame Japan s imperialism and expansionism as one of the main causes of the war. Revisionist historians like Charles Beard, Harry Elmer Barnes, and Charles Tansill, place the responsibility for Japan's declaration of war and surprise attack on the intransigent approach of the Roosevelt administration. To place the full burden of responsibility for the failure of negotiations on either Japan or the United States is to over--simplify the complex events of 1941.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline for World War II — Japan
    Unit 5: Crisis and Change Lesson F: The Failure of Democracy and Return of War Student Resource: Timeline for World War II — Japan Timeline for World War II — Japan Pre-1920: • 1853: American Commodore Matthew Perry arrived in Tokyo harbor and forced the Japanese to allow trade with U.S. merchants with threat of military action. • 1858: Western nations forced Japan to sign the Unequal Treaties. These articles established export and import tariffs and the concept of "extraterritoriality" (i.e., Japan held no jurisdiction over foreign criminals in its land. Their trials were to be conducted by foreign judges under their own nation's laws). Japan had no power to change these terms. • 1868: Japan, in an effort to modernize and prevent future Western dominance, ousted the Tokugawa Shogunate and adopted a new Meiji Emperor. The next few decades saw rapid and successful industrialization during the Meiji Restoration. • 1899: With newly gained power from recent industrialization, Japan successfully renegotiated aspects of the Unequal Treaties. • 1899–1901: The Boxer Rebellion led China to a humiliating defeat by the Eight-Nation Alliance of Western powers including the United States and Japan, ceding more territory, and dealing one of the final blows to the struggling Qing Dynasty. • 1904–1905: The Russo-Japanese War began with a surprise attack and ended by an eventual Japanese victory over Imperial Russia. The Japanese took control of Korea. • 1914: During World War I, Japan and other Allies seized German colonial possessions. • 1919: Japan, as a member of the victorious Allies during World War I, gained a mandate over various Pacific islands previously part of the German colonial empire.
    [Show full text]
  • IMPERIAL RESCRIPT WE, by Grace of Heaven, Emperor of Japan, Seated
    IMPERIAL RESCRIPT WE, by grace of heaven, Emperor of Japan, seated on the Throne of the line unbroken for ages eternal, enjoin upon ye, Our loyal and brave subjects: We hereby declare war on the United States of America and the British Empire. The men and officers of Our Army and Navy shall do their utmost in prosecuting the war, Our public servants of various departments shall perform faithfully and diligently their appointed tasks, and all other subjects of Ours shall pursue their respective duties; the entire nation with a united will shall mobilize their total strength so that nothing will miscarry in the attainment of our war aims. To insure the stability of East Asia and to contribute to world peace is the far-sighted policy which was formulated by Our Great Illustrious Imperial Grandsire and Our Great Imperial Sire succeeding Him, and which We lay constantly to heart. To cultivate friendship among nations and to enjoy prosperity in common with all nations has always been the guiding principle of Our Empire's foreign policy. It has been truly unavoidable and far from Our wishes that Our empire has now been brought to cross swords with America and Britain. More than four years have passed since the government of the Chinese Republic, failing to comprehend the true intentions of Our Empire, and recklessly courting trouble, disturbed the peace of East Asia and compelled Our Empire to take up arms. Although there has been re- established the National Government of China, with which Japan has effected neighborly intercourse and cooperation, the regime which has survived at Chungking, relying upon American and British protection, still continues its fractricidal opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • A Adler, Cyrus, 7 Akira, Kitade, 121 Akira, Yamaji, 65 Akirev Family, 107 Alaungpaya, King, 94 Allon, Yigal, 2 Almeida, Dr. Luis
    Index A Bangkok Jews, 109–110 Adler, Cyrus, 7 Barak, Ehud, 175 Akira, Kitade, 121 Baruch family, 107 Akira, Yamaji, 65 Bataan Death March, 81 Akirev family, 107 Begin, Menachem, 119 Alaungpaya, King, 94 Beijing Jewish community, 62–63 Allon, Yigal, 2 Beitar Youth Movement, 52, 57 Almeida, Dr. Luis, 1 B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation League, American Columbia Records, 131 164, 170 American immigration law of 1924, 25 Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, 4, 9, 15, 18, American-Jewish capitalists, 6–8 33, 40, 49, 72, 95 American Jewish Congress, 53, 58 Borodin-Gruzenberg, Michail, 23 American Jews, 33, 36, 46, 54, 57–59, 67, bubble economy, 173 69, 74–75, 80, 96, 104–105, 129, 148 Buddhism, 24 American Joint Distribution Committee, Bulgarian Jews, ix 60, 94, 96, 121, 123 Burmese Jews, 93–95 American occupation of Japan, 157–162 Bush, George W., 162 American Union of Orthodox Rabbis, 127 Anglo-Japanese Alliance in 1902, 44 C Anti-Comintern Pact of 1936, 48, 53, Camp Changi, 111 55, 67, 139 Camp Kanchanburi, 111 antisemitic publications, 24, 134. see also Caribbean Island of Curacao, ix The Protocols of the Elders of Zion Catholicism, 105 antisemitism, 20–21, 68, 81–83, 103, Chang Tso Lin, 50 105–106. see also Japanese Checkbook Diplomacy, 174 antisemitism; Russian antisemitism Chiang Kai-Shek, 23, 29, 48, 82, 135 Arab- Israel War, 168 Chicherin, Grigori, 20 Arab world, Japan’s attitude, 156–157 Chinese nationalism, 23, 30 Arafat, Yasser, 173 Chiune, Sugihara, 21, 70, 75, ix Arens, Moshe, 173 actions in saving Jews, 117–128 Asahi Shimbun, 134 Christianity in Japan, 11–12, 14 Ashkenazi, Rabbi Meir, 72 Chuo Koron, 21 Ashkenazi community, 99 A Citizen’s Guide to Assured Victory, 133 Aso, Taro, 175 Clinton, Bill, 174 Axis Alliance, 88, 169, ix Cohen, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Unconditional Surrender, the Emperor and the Tokyo Trial 59
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Unconditional Surrender, the Emperor and the Tokyo Trial 59 Unconditional Surrender, the Emperor and the Tokyo Trial: Implications for the Present-Day Japan-US Alliance Kazuhiko TOGO 無条件降伏・天皇・東京裁判： 現在の日米同盟に対して有する意味合い 東 郷 和 彦 <Abstract> In August 1945, when Japan was on the brink of total defeat, opinions among Japanese top leaders on when and how to surrender were divided, although everyone agreed that one condition would have to be met before any surrender: the preservation of the Imperial House. The Potsdam Declaration had been formulated in such a manner that this issue was left ambiguous. The final US reply, however, allowed sufficient room for the interpre- tation that the Imperial House would be preserved. So the Japanese Government surrendered. Since the surrender was only based on this interpretation, the defeated Government’s immediate efforts were concentrated on realiz- ing this condition through the establishment of a new Constitution (Article One) and the Tokyo Trial (not indicting the Emperor). Thus the final and only condition of the falling Empire was met. However, the crucial aspect of “honoring the commitment” was forgotten through a prevailing notion that Japan had made an unconditional surrender and that the US occupation was using the Emperor for the expediency of its occupation policy. After the signing of the San Francisco Peace Treaty even the Japanese Government itself began to acknowledge that Japan had indeed made an unconditional surrender. It is time to go back into history and recall this forgotten commit- ment in order to consolidate the contemporary Japan-US alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Outcome: Causes of World War II Causes of World War II
    World War II Outcome: Causes of World War II Causes of World War II 1. Underlying Causes of World War II a. Totalitarian Dictators gained power around the world i. Fascist leaders arose in Europe after WWI in: 1. Italy: Benito Mussolini (followers wore black shirts) 2. Spain: Franco’s fascists won the Spanish Civil War 3. Soviet Union: Joseph Stalin took control of the communist nation 4. Japan: a. Hideki Tojo: Military Leader & Prime Minister b. Emperor Hirohito: Political & Spiritual figurehead 5. Germany: Adolf Hitler (Nazism = German Fascism) Fascism a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition Benito Mussolini of Italy Francisco Franco of Spain Joseph Stalin in The Soviet Union Hideki Tojo & Emperor Hirohito Adolf Hitler in Germany Causes of World War II b. Each dictator took advantage of economic problems by: i. Promising simple solutions to their nation’s problems ii. Rebuilding national pride (often using propaganda) iii. Providing scapegoats (targets for anger & blame) iv. Absorbing power, taking away individual rights, and crushing opposition (1 party; 1 ruler) Adolf Hitler in Germany Causes of World War II c. Nationalism + Imperialism i. In Germany, Adolf Hitler preached: 1. Vengeance against (4 hates) a. Democracies (a weak & undisciplined form of gov’t) b. Communism (a threat to Nazi growth) c. November Criminals who signed the WWI Armistice d. Jews (the source of all evil & problems in Germany) 2. Anti-Semitism & racial supremacy (The Master Race) 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Japanese Navy in 1941
    THE PACIFIC WAR PAPERS .......................... 10771$ $$FM 02-08-05 09:29:45 PS PAGE i ALSO BY THE AUTHORS By Donald M. Goldstein and Katherine V. Dillon: The Williwaw War (1992) The Pearl Harbor Papers: Inside the Japanese Plans (1993) Amelia: The Centennial Biography of an Aviation Pioneer (1997) By Donald M. Goldstein and Katherine V. Dillon, with J. Michael Wenger: The Way It Was: Pearl Harbor: The Original Photographs (1991) D-Day Normandy: The Story and Photographs (1993) ‘‘Nuts!’’ The Battle of the Bulge: The Story and Photographs (1994) Rain of Ruin: The Hiroshima and Nagasaki Atomic Bombs (1995) The Vietnam War: The Story and Photographs (1997) The Spanish-American War: The Story and Photographs (1998) By Donald M. Goldstein and Katherine V. Dillon, with Gordon W. Prange: At Dawn We Slept: The Untold Story of Pearl Harbor (1981) Miracle at Midway (1982) Target Tokyo: The Story of the Sorge Spy Ring (1984) Pearl Harbor: The Verdict of History (1987) December 7, 1941: The Day the Japanese Attacked Pearl Harbor (1988) God’s Samurai: Lead Pilot at Pearl Harbor (1990) By Donald M. Goldstein and Katherine V. Dillon, with Masataka Chihaya: Fading Victory: The Diary of Admiral Matome Ugaki (1991) By Donald M. Goldstein and Harry J. Maihafer: The Korean War: The Story and Photographs (2000) America in World War I: The Story and Photographs (2003) By Donald M. Goldstein, Phil Williams, and J. M. Shafritz: Classic Readings of International Relations (1998) By Donald M. Goldstein, Phil Williams, and Hank Andrews: Security in Korea: War, Stalemate and Negation (1994) .........................
    [Show full text]