DOCSLIB.ORG

Novaesium-Odt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Novaesium-Odt The orientation of the plan of Novaesium, a Roman fort on the Rhine Amelia Carolina Sparavigna To cite this version: Amelia Carolina Sparavigna. The orientation of the plan of Novaesium, a Roman fort on the Rhine. 2019. hal-02139989 HAL Id: hal-02139989 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02139989 Preprint submitted on 26 May 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The orientation of the plan of Novaesium, a Roman fort on the Rhine Amelia Carolina Sparavigna Dipartimento di Scienza Applicata e Tecnologia, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy Abstract Novaesium was a Roman fort on the Rhine, a fort which served for the campaigns of Augustus and Drusus against Germans. The plan is the standard one of the Roman camps. Here we discuss its orientation. It has its decumanus having, as far as we can see from archaeological surveys, an azimuth of about 118 degrees. The fort has a perfect orientation "secundum naturam". In the case that this castrum were oriented "secundum coelum", that is in the direction of the sunrise on the day of its foundation, it could had been founded on November 13 or February 1 (Julian dates). This second date is interesting, because it is coincident to the historical date of 30 January, the birthday of Drusus’ mother and Augusts’ wife, Livia. Keywords: Archaeoastronomy. Writte 22 May 2019. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3168183 After the Caesar's Gallic Wars, Rome considered important to establish a better control of the Lower Rhine. A local government and a network of roads were established, in order of securing and developing the areas conquered by Caesar. A further expansionist policy was not under consideration [1]. However the region was subjected to increasing and prolonged attacks by Germanic tribes, which culminated in the so-called Clades Lolliana. The Roman governor Marcus Lollius was defeated by united forces of Sicambri, Tencteri and Usipetes. The Clades, in 17 or 16 BC, changed the policy. In 16 BC, Augustus went in Gaul in order to settle, once for all, this Germanic problem. He spent three years in Gaul. In this period the Rhine line lost its formerly defensive character and became an offensive base against the Germanic areas, east of the river. The troops, which had been freed after the Alpine campaigns, were relocated to the Rhine, and the legion camps of Noviomagus at Nijmegen and Vetera at Xanten were built. As Augustus in 13 BC returned to Rome, he gave the supreme command to his stepson Drusus1. The large-scale offensive against the Germans, in the years 12-9 BC, took the name of Drusus Offensive. Novaesium, today Neuss, probably served as a base for the campaigns on the east bank of the Rhine. Drusus led a total of four campaigns there, during which the main activities shifted into the area ofChatti. After his early death, the campaigns were continued by Tiberius (9-6 BC), Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus (around the year 3 BC), Marcus Vinicius (at the turn of the century) and from the year 4 AD again by Tiberius [1]. 1 Nero Claudius Drusus Germanicus (38 BC – summer of 9 BC), was a Roman politician and military commander. He was the son of Livia Drusilla and the legal stepson of her second husband, the Emperor Augustus. He was also brother of the Emperor Tiberius, father to both the Emperor Claudius and general Germanicus, paternal grandfather of the Emperor Caligula, and maternal great-grandfather of the Emperor Nero. In [2], we read that Novaesium was, together with Nijmegen, the oldest military base in Germania Inferior, founded by Drusus before 16 BC. It was built on a natural terrace that was protected in the south by a little river, the Erft. Launching his campaigns from Nijmegen and Neuss, Drusus conquered the valley of the Lippe on the east bank of the Rhine. After a couple of years, Nijmegen and Neuss were abandoned, because the army was transferred to Oberaden. In [3] we find Novaesium founded in 16 BC. In it.wikipedia we can find a detailed discussion of Novaesium too. Let us consider the position of the fort, as we can see from images given in arachne.uni- koeln.de/arachne/index.php (8003151: Legions lager Novaesium, sog. Koenenlager Neuss (Rhein- Kreis)) and in Wikipedia. We can prepare the Fig.1. Figure 1. Location of the fort. In the Figure 1 we can see the location of the fort in Gnadental. On the right, the plan of the fort is added to the satellite image. The main axis of the fort, the decumanus, is the Kölner Strasse. At the time, the Rhine had a different riverbed. River Erft was close to the fort. Probably the water for the fort was obtained from this river. Usually, the decumanus of a Roman city, castrum (military camp), or colonia, is defined as an east- west-oriented road [4,5]. However, this is not literally true. The orientation of the decumanus, which is also giving the orientation of the planning of the settlement, was mainly fitting the local environment. Besides this orientation, which is defined “secundum naturam”, the axis of a Roman settlement could have been determined by the local presence of a main road [6]. For instance, in the case of Novaesium, the decumanus, which is today the Kölner Strasse, was a part of a Roman road that was running parallel to the old riverbed of the Rhine. In any case, reasons exist for the supposition of an east-west orientation of the decumani. The supposition is coming from the fact that in the Latin literature it is mentioned the alignment of the main axis of Roman settlements along the sunrise direction on the day of foundation [7]. This orientation is “secundum coelum”, that is, according to the Heavens. Then, to complete our discussion on the decumanus of Novaesium, we have to determine if an orientation to the sunrise is possible. For this reason, let us determine its azimuth, from true North. Using a map from arachne.uni-koeln.de/arachne/index.php, we find a value of 118.2°. We can compare it to the sunrise azimuth on days of 17 BC and 16 BC. To have the value of the sunrise azimuth we use Stellarium software. Let us imagine that the decumanus was oriented towards the center of the rising sun. It means that, in the case of a flat horizon – like at Novaesium - and for a standard atmospheric refraction, the center of the sun was at an altitude of -0°36’ (see detail of the method in [8]). We find the following azimuths given in the Table 1. Table 1. From the Table, we have two days for the foundation of Novaesium, 13 November 17 BC or 1 February 16 BC. Let us note that the dates are given according to the Julian dates of Stellarium. These dates are different from those of the Julian Calendar of the time. As discussed in [9], we have some differences. To the dates of the Julian Calendar from (historical) 1 March 17 BC to 28 February 16 BC, we have to add 2 to obtain the Julian date. It means that, to the dates of the Table 1, we have to subtract 2. Therefore 13 November 17 BC was the historical 11 November 17 BC and 1 February 16 BC was the historical 30 January 16 BC. This last date (30 January) is particularly interesting. This is the birthday of Livia, the mother of Drusus. Of course, the orientation of Novaesium “secundum naturam” is the one which seems more probable. However, the possibility exists that Drusus oriented the settlement, founding it on the day of his mother’s birthday. References [1] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novaesium [2] https://www.livius.org/articles/place/novaesium-neuss/ [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuss#Ancient_Rome [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decumanus_Maximus [5] John E. Stambaugh (1 May 1988). The Ancient Roman City. JHU Press. pp. 283–. ISBN 978-0- 8018-3692-3. [6] CENTURIAZIONE, di F. Castagnoli - Enciclopedia dell' Arte Antica (1959) [7] Sparavigna, Amelia Carolina, Solstices at the Hardknott Roman Fort (December 17, 2014). PHILICA Article number 442. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2745184 [8] Sparavigna, Amelia Carolina. (2019, May 1). Archaeoastronomical analysis of the Roman Colonia Marciana Ulpia Traiana Thamugadi (Timgad) , founded at the sunrise of Trajan's Birthday. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2656658 [9] Sparavigna, Amelia Carolina. (2019, May 16). The first Calends of the Julian Calendar. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2860135.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Gallo-Roman Relations Under the Early Empire by Ryan Walsh A
    Gallo-Roman Relations under the Early Empire By Ryan Walsh A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in Ancient Mediterranean Cultures Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2013 © Ryan Walsh 2013 1 Author's Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract This paper examines the changing attitudes of Gallo-Romans from the time of Caesar's conquest in the 50s BCE to the start of Vespasian's reign in 70-71 CE and how Roman prejudice shaped those attitudes. I first examine the conflicted opinions of the Gauls in Caesar's time and how they eventually banded together against him but were defeated. Next, the activities of each Julio-Claudian emperor are examined to see how they impacted Gaul and what the Gallo-Roman response was. Throughout this period there is clear evidence of increased Romanisation amongst the Gauls and the prominence of the region is obvious in imperial policy. This changes with Nero's reign where Vindex's rebellion against the emperor highlights the prejudices still effecting Roman attitudes. This only becomes worse in the rebellion of Civilis the next year. After these revolts, the Gallo-Romans appear to retreat from imperial offices and stick to local affairs, likely as a direct response to Rome's rejection of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Resettlement Into Roman Territory Across the Rhine and the Danube Under the Early Empire (To the Marcomannic Wars)*
    Eos C 2013 / fasciculus extra ordinem editus electronicus ISSN 0012-7825 RESETTLEMENT INTO ROMAN TERRITORY ACROSS THE RHINE AND THE DANUBE UNDER THE EARLY EMPIRE (TO THE MARCOMANNIC WARS)* By LESZEK MROZEWICZ The purpose of this paper is to investigate the resettling of tribes from across the Rhine and the Danube onto their Roman side as part of the Roman limes policy, an important factor making the frontier easier to defend and one way of treating the population settled in the vicinity of the Empire’s borders. The temporal framework set in the title follows from both the state of preser- vation of sources attesting resettling operations as regards the first two hundred years of the Empire, the turn of the eras and the time of the Marcomannic Wars, and from the stark difference in the nature of those resettlements between the times of the Julio-Claudian emperors on the one hand, and of Marcus Aurelius on the other. Such, too, is the thesis of the article: that the resettlements of the period of the Marcomannic Wars were a sign heralding the resettlements that would come in late antiquity1, forced by peoples pressing against the river line, and eventu- ally taking place completely out of Rome’s control. Under the Julio-Claudian dynasty, on the other hand, the Romans were in total control of the situation and transferring whole tribes into the territory of the Empire was symptomatic of their active border policies. There is one more reason to list, compare and analyse Roman resettlement operations: for the early Empire period, the literature on the subject is very much dominated by studies into individual tribe transfers, and works whose range en- * Originally published in Polish in “Eos” LXXV 1987, fasc.
    [Show full text]
  • Bullard Eva 2013 MA.Pdf
    Marcomannia in the making. by Eva Bullard BA, University of Victoria, 2008 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Greek and Roman Studies Eva Bullard 2013 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee Marcomannia in the making by Eva Bullard BA, University of Victoria, 2008 Supervisory Committee Dr. John P. Oleson, Department of Greek and Roman Studies Supervisor Dr. Gregory D. Rowe, Department of Greek and Roman Studies Departmental Member iii Abstract Supervisory Committee John P. Oleson, Department of Greek and Roman Studies Supervisor Dr. Gregory D. Rowe, Department of Greek and Roman Studies Departmental Member During the last stages of the Marcommani Wars in the late second century A.D., Roman literary sources recorded that the Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius was planning to annex the Germanic territory of the Marcomannic and Quadic tribes. This work will propose that Marcus Aurelius was going to create a province called Marcomannia. The thesis will be supported by archaeological data originating from excavations in the Roman installation at Mušov, Moravia, Czech Republic. The investigation will examine the history of the non-Roman region beyond the northern Danubian frontier, the character of Roman occupation and creation of other Roman provinces on the Danube, and consult primary sources and modern research on the topic of Roman expansion and empire building during the principate. iv Table of Contents Supervisory Committee .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhine: Germany's River, Not Germany's Boundary
    Source: E.M. Arndt, Deutschlands Fluss, aber nicht Deutschlands Gränze, English trl. UvA Talen / SPIN. the French was as bad as it was foolish. One would have The Rhine: Germany’s river, not Germany’s thought that ten years, indeed twenty years, of blindness and misfortune might have sent a little light into their dark minds boundary and brought the errants back into line, especially since the French had long ago overturned their own proof, but far from it. There are still many who behave, indeed who exhaust Ernst Moritz Arndt themselves in deductions and proofs, as if the Rhine as the border between France and Germany is something indispu- table and settled. So effective is constant repetition, and so little are most Germans – who pride themselves on their ‘The Rhine is France’s natural boundary’ is what Sully proved profundity in thought and speech – accustomed to thinking. 1600 and 1610; ‘the Rhine is France’s natural boundary,’ The empty echoing of foreign opinions, especially the proclaimed Richelieu in 1625 and 1635; ‘the Rhine is France’s echoing of French hocus-pocus and sophistries, has sadly natural boundary,’ declared Count d’Avaux in the 1640s at become too much of a fashion on this side of the Rhine, in Münster, in the holy places where Hermann the Cheruscan had the country where thoroughness and depth of thought is once made a dufferent typeof declaration to the Romans; ‘the supposed to reside. Given this state of affairs, especially this Rhine is France’s natural boundary,’ resounded from 1670 to sad state of German minds and hearts, I consider it not super- 1700 in Louvois’ and Colbert’s speeches in Louis XIV’s council fluous to present our ancient, magnificent and holy River of state, and the court poets Boileau and Racine sang it in the Rhine, what it was, is and will be, to the good German antechamber; ‘the Rhine is France’s natural boundary’ cried the people, who are confused by too many political prattlers and monsters on the Seine from 1790 to 1800.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluación Para El Acceso a La Universidad
    Evaluación para el Acceso a la Universidad Convocatoria de 2017 Materia: LATÍN II Instrucciones: El alumno debe elegir una propuesta. En la propuesta seleccionada, el alumno debe traducir el texto latino (hasta 4 puntos) y contestar a las tres cuestiones. Se valorarán la ortografía y la coherencia de las respuestas. Para la traducción puede usarse un diccionario latino-español con el apéndice gramatical. Todas las preguntas se deben responder en el cuadernillo, el alumno se queda con la hoja de examen. PROPUESTA A 1. Traducción del siguiente texto: (4 puntos: 1 hasta “Tencteri”,1’5 hasta “sustinuerunt”,1,5 hasta el final. ) Usipetes y tencteros llegan al río Rin después de errar durante tres años, forzados por los suevos. In eādem causā1 fuerunt Usipetes et Tencteri2, quos supra diximus, qui complures annos3 Sueborum4 vim 5 sustinuerunt, ad extremum6 tamen, agris expulsi et multis locis Germaniae7 triennium8 vagati, ad Rhenum9 pervenerunt. (De Bello Gallico IV, IV) 1-causa : “situación”. 2-Usipetes, -um/ Tencteri, -orum : usipetes y tencteros, pueblos germánicos. 3-complures annos: “durante muchos años”. 4- Suebi,-orum: suevos, pueblo germánico. 5- vis, vis :” violencia” .6- ad extremum: locución adverbial, “al fin”.7- Germania, -ae : Germania. 8-triennium, -i: trienio, tres años. 9- Rhenus, -i : el río Rin. 2. Análisis morfosintáctico del siguiente texto: (2 puntos) a- Analiza sintácticamente el siguiente texto: (1) In eādem causā fuerunt Usipetes et Tencteri, quos supra diximus, qui complures annos Sueborum vim sustinuerunt. b- Enuncia las palabras en negrilla indicando, además del enunciado, género, nº, caso1, si no es verbo; si es verbo, además del enunciado de los tres temas, persona, nº y tiempo.(1) 1-caso en el que la palabra está en este texto.
    [Show full text]
  • Provinzialrömischen, Im Letzten Grunde Klassischen Vorbilder. Die
    165 provinzialrömischen, im letzten Grunde klassischen Vorbilder. Die Masse der wenig oder gar nicht romanisierten Unterschicht wird für uns eben noch weniger als in Gallien in den Steindenkmälern greifbar. Importierte Skulptur, wie sie gerade so gut in Italien ge­ funden sein könnte und auf dem linken Rheinufer gelegentlich sich findet, fehlt, mit Ausnahme natürlich von Bronzen, auf dem rechten Rheinufer ganz. Das Marmorrelief Nr. 438 (Bruchstück eines Sarkophags ?) in Mannheim ist aus dem Rhein gezogen, also seine Herkunft vom rechten Ufer zweifelhaft. Daß sich außer im unmittelbaren Vorlande des linken Rheinufers fast keine mit Relief geschmückten Militärgrabsteine finden, liegt in erster Linie an der Zeit der Ok­ kupation des rechten Ufers, in der die Militärreliefs überhaupt bald aufhören, was z. T. doch wohl sicher auch mit der fortschreitenden Barbarisierung der Truppenkörper zu ­ sammenhängt. Aber auch Zivilgrabsteine mit Relief sind selten, große Grabmäler, wie auf dem linken Ufer, finden sich kaum, und im Zusammenhang damit steht denn auch, daß die charakteristischen Szenen aus dem Alltagsleben, wie sie das linke Rheinufer kennt, fast ganz fehlen. Deshalb stimme ich E. gern zu, wenn er für den Stein unbekann ­ ten Fundortes Nr. 427 im Museum in Mannheim linksrheinische Herkunft vermutet. Jeder, der in der Richtung obiger Andeutungen sich jetzt an die Durcharbeit der rechtsrheinischen Steindenkmäler macht, wird dankbar sich der Vorarbeit E.s bedienen, die er in seinem großen, jetzt vollendeten Werk geleistet hat, das den Skulpturen ­ bestand eines wichtigen Teiles des römischen Weltreiches zum erstenmal überschauen läßt. Den Dank der Wissenschaft wird E. selbst um so stärker und freudiger empfinden, je energischer, eindringlicher und vielseitiger jetzt die Arbeit an der provinzialen Plastik einsetzt, für die sich erfreulicherweise neuerdings auch die kunstgeschichtliche Forschung zu interessieren beginnt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476)
    Impact of Empire 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd i 5-4-2007 8:35:52 Impact of Empire Editorial Board of the series Impact of Empire (= Management Team of the Network Impact of Empire) Lukas de Blois, Angelos Chaniotis Ségolène Demougin, Olivier Hekster, Gerda de Kleijn Luuk de Ligt, Elio Lo Cascio, Michael Peachin John Rich, and Christian Witschel Executive Secretariat of the Series and the Network Lukas de Blois, Olivier Hekster Gerda de Kleijn and John Rich Radboud University of Nijmegen, Erasmusplein 1, P.O. Box 9103, 6500 HD Nijmegen, The Netherlands E-mail addresses: [email protected] and [email protected] Academic Board of the International Network Impact of Empire geza alföldy – stéphane benoist – anthony birley christer bruun – john drinkwater – werner eck – peter funke andrea giardina – johannes hahn – fik meijer – onno van nijf marie-thérèse raepsaet-charlier – john richardson bert van der spek – richard talbert – willem zwalve VOLUME 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd ii 5-4-2007 8:35:52 The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476) Economic, Social, Political, Religious and Cultural Aspects Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Roman Empire, 200 B.C. – A.D. 476) Capri, March 29 – April 2, 2005 Edited by Lukas de Blois & Elio Lo Cascio With the Aid of Olivier Hekster & Gerda de Kleijn LEIDEN • BOSTON 2007 This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • The Orientation of the Plan of Novaesium, a Roman Fort on the Rhine
    The orientation of the plan of Novaesium, a Roman fort on the Rhine Amelia Carolina Sparavigna Dipartimento di Scienza Applicata e Tecnologia, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy Abstract Novaesium was a Roman fort on the Rhine, a fort which served for the campaigns of Augustus and Drusus against Germans. The plan is the standard one of the Roman camps. Here we discuss its orientation. It has its decumanus having, as far as we can see from archaeological surveys, an azimuth of about 118 degrees. The fort has a perfect orientation "secundum naturam". In the case that this castrum were oriented "secundum coelum", that is in the direction of the sunrise on the day of its foundation, it could had been founded on November 13 or February 1 (Julian dates). This second date is interesting, because it is coincident to the historical date of 30 January, the birthday of Drusus’ mother and Augusts’ wife, Livia. Keywords: Archaeoastronomy. Writte 22 May 2019. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3168183 After the Caesar's Gallic Wars, Rome considered important to establish a better control of the Lower Rhine. A local government and a network of roads were established, in order of securing and developing the areas conquered by Caesar. A further expansionist policy was not under consideration [1]. However the region was subjected to increasing and prolonged attacks by Germanic tribes, which culminated in the so-called Clades Lolliana. The Roman governor Marcus Lollius was defeated by united forces of Sicambri, Tencteri and Usipetes. The Clades, in 17 or 16 BC, changed the policy. In 16 BC, Augustus went in Gaul in order to settle, once for all, this Germanic problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Romans and Barbarians in Tacitus' Battle Narratives
    ROMANS AND BARBARIANS IN TACITUS’ BATTLE NARRATIVES by RYAN MICHAEL SEEGER (Under the direction of Dr. Susan Mattern-Parkes) ABSTRACT The purpose of the study is to examine how Tacitus constructs ethnic stereotypes, namely those of the Romans and of the barbarians, in his battle narratives. The first section of the study explores his descriptions of technical aspects of the battle narrative, such as topography, use of weaponry, battle formations, and sieges. The second section examines the value judgments that Tacitus makes about the combatants and their actions, discussing the themes of discipline and virtus, as well as the leaders’ ability to lead by example and stifle dissent. In his descriptions of both the technical and the “moral” aspects of battle, Tacitus shapes his Romans quite differently from his barbarians. Tacitus constructs identities in his battle narratives possibly to satisfy his audience’s expectations or to make the scenes more understandable. Such constructions indicate that ethnocentrism plays an important role in Latin historiography, revealing racial prejudice in Roman society. INDEX WORDS: Tacitus, battle narratives, Roman army, barbarians, ethnicity. ROMANS AND BARBARIANS IN TACITUS’ BATTLE NARRATIVES by RYAN MICHAEL SEEGER B. A., Appalachian State University, 1998 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2002 © 2002 Ryan Michael Seeger All Rights Reserved ROMANS AND BARBARIANS IN TACITUS’ BATTLE NARRATIVES by RYAN MICHAEL SEEGER Approved: Major Professor: Susan Mattern-Parkes Committee: James Anderson Erika Thorgerson-Hermanowicz Electronic Version Approved: Gordhan L. Patel Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia August 2002 iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Several people were instrumental in the completion of this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Ethnography Encountered
    ETHNOGRAPHY ENCOUNTERED: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE ETHNOGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK OF CAESAR'S GALLIC WAR Over a decade before he came, saw, and conquered at Zela in 46 BC, Julius Caesar was engaged in a similar—if much more extended—enterprise in Gaul and neighboring regions of northern Europe. Although he set out initially to face the threat of the Helvetii, Caesar managed to extend this originally brief expedition into an eight-year sequence of campaigns that took him to the unexplored frontiers of the known world, where he encountered a seemingly endless supply of new and conveniently threatening peoples to conquer. The events of this campaign were documented by Caesar in his de Bello Gallico. While the work's primary focus was on political interactions and wars with the barbarian tribes of northern Europe, Caesar also included a number of ethnographic accounts of these peoples, some of which were the first of their kind in ancient ethnography. As a genre, ethnography had existed among the Greeks for centuries, but Caesar was one of the first Romans of whom we know to write in a deliberately ethnographic mode.1 Furthermore, Caesar appears to have been the first author, Greek or Roman, to write an ethnography of the Germans,2 the first Roman to explore Britain, and one of few ancient authors by his date to have written an ethnographic account of the island's inhabitants. Caesar was not, however, merely content with covering new geographic and literary ground. The structure and content of the ethnographic sections of the Gallic War not only indicate that Caesar was aware of and engaging with the Greek ethnographic tradition, 3 but also that he included them with the 1 The only surviving text predating Caesar that engages in ethnographic inquiry in any length or detail is Cato the Elder's Origines, which now exists only in fragments, some of which concern the Gauls of northern Italy (Williams (2001) 71-80; Woolf (2011) 60).
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Soldier Germanic Warrior Lindsay Ppowellowell
    1st Century AD Roman Soldier VERSUS Germanic Warrior Lindsay Powell © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com 1st Century ad Roman Soldier Germanic Warrior Lindsay PowellPowell © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com INTRODUCTION 4 THE OPPOSING SIDES 10 Recruitment and motivation t Morale and logistics t Training, doctrine and tactics Leadership and communications t Use of allies and auxiliaries TEUTOBURG PASS 28 Summer AD 9 IDISTAVISO 41 Summer AD 16 THE ANGRIVARIAN WALL 57 Summer AD 16 ANALYSIS 71 Leadership t Mission objectives and strategies t Planning and preparation Tactics, combat doctrine and weapons AFTERMATH 76 BIBLIOGRAPHY 78 INDEX 80 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com Introduction ‘Who would leave Asia, or Africa, or Italia for Germania, with its wild country, its inclement skies, its sullen manners and aspect, unless indeed it were his home?’ (Tacitus, Germania 2). This negative perception of Germania – the modern Netherlands and Germany – lay behind the reluctance of Rome’s great military commanders to tame its immense wilderness. Caius Iulius Caesar famously threw a wooden pontoon bridge across the River Rhine (Rhenus) in just ten days, not once but twice, in 55 and 53 bc. The next Roman general to do so was Marcus Agrippa, in 39/38 bc or 19/18 bc. However, none of these missions was for conquest, but in response to pleas for assistance from an ally of the Romans, the Germanic nation of the Ubii. It was not until the reign of Caesar Augustus that a serious attempt was made to annex the land beyond the wide river and transform it into a province fit for Romans to live in.
    [Show full text]
  • Julius Caesar and the Germans
    Julius Caesar and the Germans Amelia Carolina Sparavigna Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy This article is proposing a discussion of what was written in De Bello Gallico on Caesar's military campaign against the Germans, in particular against Usipetes and Tencteri. It will also be analyzed what was said by Plutarch about the accusation, made to Caesar by Cato the Younger, of having violated the truce with these Germans. Finally, the texts of Caesar and Plutarch will be compared with what is written in the books by Luciano Canfora and Jérôme Carcopino. Torino, 3 Agosto 2018. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1328251. Revised 30 November 2018 Recently, some Dutch archaeologists have proposed a reconstruction of the physical appearance of Julius Caesar [1]. The reconstruction, which I discussed in [2-4], was used to launch a book by Tom Buijtendorp, Caesar in de Lage Landen, on Caesar's military campaign against the Germans, in particular against Usipetes and Tencteri tribes, a campaign that took place in the territory crossed by the Rhine and today located in the Netherlands. [5]. Some clarifications on this military campaign are, in my opinion, necessary. They are contained in the article that I am now proposing. In it, the reader will find the analysis of what Caesar wrote in his De Bello Gallico and what Plutarch told about the accusation made to Caesar by Cato the Younger, of violating the truce with these Germans. Finally, the texts of Caesar and Plutarch will be compared with what is written in the books by Luciano Canfora and Jérôme Carcopino.
    [Show full text]