DOCSLIB.ORG

Korean CIO Survey 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Korean CIO Survey 2008 Korean CIO Survey 2008 Korean CIO Survey 2008 Innovation through IT for Business Results A comparison of Korean and global views on the role of the IT function in business innovation Innovation through IT for Business Results Table of Contents Foreword 1 Participating Companies and Organizations 2 Executive Summary 4 Innovation - A Definition 5 Business Innovation through IT for Delivering Results 6 Areas Where Innovation Delivers Results 8 Strategic IT Capabilities Beyond the IT Fundamentals 12 Building a Relationship for Business Innovation 16 Expanding the Network to Include External Partners 18 A New Start for the CIO as a Leader of Innovation 22 About the Survey 24 About Samsung SDS, OpenTide and Capgemini 25 Copyright © 2008 Samsung SDS, OpenTide and Capgemini. All rights reserved. Korean CIO Survey 2008 Foreword With the global economy changing rapidly, For that reason, this survey addresses the and uncertainty growing in the Korean role of the CIO and the IT function in market, it becomes more important, yet business innovation and proposes strategies more difficult, for organizations to make the that can put CIOs in a better position to right investment decisions. drive business innovation. Focusing on the right decisions and choices We thank all the CIOs who participated for is particularly critical during the current sharing their opinions with us. We value global economic turmoil. Because of the your effort and commitment. We hope considerable amount of investment and that this report will stimulate discussion costs involved in IT, it is more important about the role of the IT function in Korea, now than ever for CIOs to ask questions its relationship to the business and how it like: “is the IT function focused on business can add value by participating in business values and performing well against business innovation. priorities?” and: “does the IT function have sufficient IT capabilities, and make sufficient use of internal and external resources, to achieve this objective?” We feel that it is the right time to survey In Kim the views of CIOs in Korea in order to Samsung SDS CEO discover the answers to questions like these. The Korean CIO survey is based on one- to-one interviews with 100 Korean CIOs, representing all industry sectors. It is the result of a close collaboration between Samsung SDS, OpenTide and Capgemini Eui Noung Han Consulting. We have also taken the OpenTide opportunity to make comparisons with 400 CEO of our respondents’ global counterparts, interviewed for Capgemini’s 2008 Global CIO Survey. During this critical period, global CIOs are making efforts to participate proactively in corporate decision making, to act as drivers Eric Monnoyer Capgemini Consulting of innovation and to stake a claim to be the Vice President focal point for sustainable growth within the BIS Global Leader corporation. Innovation through IT for Business Results 1 Participating Companies and Organizations Samsung SDS, OpenTide and Capgemini Consulting would like to thank all 100 participating CIOs and senior managers who gave time to be interviewed for this CIO survey: Business Services Samsung Investments SungShin Cement Ajou University Medical Center Samsung Life Taekwang Asiana Airline Samsung Securities Cheil Worldwide Shinhan Financial Group Public, Government & Social Hallym University Medical Center Ministry of Environment Hansol PNS Manufacturing Korea Securities Depository Hotel Shilla Cheil Industries Korea Tourism Organization Korea Enterprise Data Dong-A Pharmaceutical Military Manpower Korea University Hospital DongBu HiTek-SemiConductor Division Administration Postech Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade S1 Eugene Ministry of Public Admin. and Security SungKyunKwan University Green Cross The Bank of Korea Halla Climate Control Consumer Products & Retail Hynix Telecom, Media & Amore Pacific Hyosung Entertainment CJ CheilJedang Hyundai Steel LG Telecom CJ Corporation Il Dong Pharmaceutical Samsung Everland Resort Dongsuh Foods IlYang Pharmaceutical Taekwang systems Pulmuone LS Cable MagnaChip Travel, Transport & Logistics POSCO Energy & Utilities Charmzone Renault Samsung Motors KEPCO GS Homeshopping Samsung BP Chemical Hmall Samsung C&T - Construction Financial Services IMK Samsung Corning Precision Glass Incheon International Airport Corporation Heungkuk Life Insurance Samsung Electronics KORAIL Industrial Bank of Korea Samsung Electro-Mechanics Lotte Mart Korea Development Bank Samsung Engineering Samsung C&T - Trade Korea Securities Finance Corporation Samsung Fine Chemicals Kyobo Life Insurance SK Networks Samsung Heavy Industries Additional companies participated in the survey MetLife Korea Samsung Petrochemical but requested to remain anonymous. Mirae Asset Life Insurance Samsung SDI Mirae Asset Samsung Techwin National Health Insurance Samsung Total Petrochemicals National Pension Service SeAH Besteel NHNonghyup SeAH Steel Prudential Life Insurance Korea SK Engineering & Construction Samsung Card SsangYong Motor 2 Korean CIO Survey 2008 Business Innovation through IT “ ” Innovation through IT for Business Results 3 Executive Summary Business innovation is not a new mission Currently, domestic CIOs1 lag behind for CIOs in Korea. In fact, they already international ones in enterprise-level contribute to business innovation, for activities, such as participating in corporate example, by improving efficiency through IT. strategy development, while there also seems to be a lack of participation and Despite this achievement, CIOs are having interest from Korean business management to respond to ever-growing demands in IT strategy and decision-making. One of from top management, because of the key the key concerns for Korean CIOs is how role played by information technology in they can help the CEO, and the business business innovation today. They are well as a whole, to increase their understanding aware that the ability of the CIO and of the of IT. For this, CIOs must secure their IT organization to create business value position as a partner to the business. This, is critical and that the business expects together with strong sponsorship from top the CIO to deliver results. As to how well management, will allow CIOs to discuss they have met these expectations, CIOs ideas and work together with the business themselves admit to some gaps. in pursuit of innovation. We canvassed the views of Korean CIOs Rapid changes in the technology about the actual and potential role of the IT environment can lead to resource function with respect to business innovation. constraints and can impair a company’s We then compared the responses of our 100 ability to innovate. Many international Korean CIOs with Capgemini’s survey of companies have already established a wide 400 CIOs worldwide. network of IT suppliers, clients, universities and other partners to adopt new ideas and We found that, up until now, Korean CIOs technologies and to develop professional have focused on basic IT performance in knowledge for innovation. To do this in an areas such as infrastructure management effective and timely manner, Korean CIOs and business support. Korean IT must also have the ability to combine and functions were more successful than their utilize different channels as needed. international counterparts in these areas. However, current capabilities are insufficient The unique selling point of CIOs is their to drive innovation further. First, companies combination of deep understanding of must build their strategic IT strengths, such the business, technology market insight as the ability to identify IT-based innovative and their ability to deliver the value of opportunities within and outside of the technology to management and business. company. Organizations must also invest in If they can capitalise on these attributes to these innovation-oriented strengths. deliver business value, then Korean CIOs will be able to secure their position as leaders of innovation. 1 Throughout this report we will use terms like “domestic CIOs” and “domestic companies” to refer to the respondents to our Korean survey; “global CIOs” refers to the respondents to Capgemini’s Global CIO Survey. 4 Korean CIO Survey 2008 Innovation - A Definition A definition of innovation is needed here, because what is innovative to one person can be a minor change to another, and what is innovative today is business as usual tomorrow. For the purposes of this survey we have adopted the definition famously put forward by Peter F. Drucker (writer, sociologist and management theorist, who died in 2005): “Change that creates a new dimension of performance” This report is concerned with a specific type of innovation: business innovation and its relationship to the CIO2 and IT function. Innovation in the way that IT is delivered is outside the scope of the report. 2 The Chief Information Officer (CIO) title is not consistently used across organizations and geographies. For the purposes of this report, we have taken it to mean the person who is ultimately responsible for the IT function. Innovation through IT for Business Results 5 Business Innovation through IT for Delivering Results Figure 1 Until now we have IT’s key role in business Innovation is a top priority for your business focused on building IT innovation capabilities as a foundation. CIOs, both in Korea and globally, agree that Global 73% “ From now on, we have to innovation is a cornerstone of corporate Korea 88% make the effort to create strategy, and that information
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped
    2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) Alteogen 0.19 KOREA Hyundai Engineering & Construction 0.35 KOREA NH Investment & Securities 0.14 KOREA AmoreG 0.15 KOREA Hyundai Glovis 0.32 KOREA NHN 0.07 KOREA Amorepacific Corp 0.65 KOREA Hyundai Heavy Industries 0.29 KOREA Nong Shim 0.08 KOREA Amorepacific Pfd. 0.08 KOREA Hyundai Marine & Fire Insurance 0.13 KOREA OCI 0.17 KOREA BGF Retail 0.09 KOREA Hyundai Merchant Marine 1.02 KOREA Orion 0.21 KOREA BNK Financial Group 0.18 KOREA Hyundai Mipo Dockyard 0.15 KOREA Ottogi 0.06 KOREA Celltrion Healthcare 0.68 KOREA Hyundai Mobis 1.53 KOREA Paradise 0.07 KOREA Celltrion Inc 2.29 KOREA Hyundai Motor 2.74 KOREA Posco 1.85 KOREA Celltrion Pharm 0.24 KOREA Hyundai Motor 2nd Pfd. 0.33 KOREA Posco Chemical 0.32 KOREA Cheil Worldwide 0.14 KOREA Hyundai Motor Pfd. 0.21 KOREA Posco International 0.09 KOREA CJ Cheiljedang 0.3 KOREA Hyundai Steel 0.33 KOREA S1 Corporation 0.13 KOREA CJ CheilJedang Pfd. 0.02 KOREA Hyundai Wia 0.13 KOREA Samsung Biologics 0.92 KOREA CJ Corp 0.11 KOREA Industrial Bank of Korea 0.22 KOREA Samsung C&T 0.94 KOREA CJ ENM 0.15 KOREA Kakao 3.65 KOREA Samsung Card 0.08 KOREA CJ Logistics 0.12 KOREA Kangwon Land 0.23 KOREA Samsung Electro-Mechanics 0.81 KOREA Coway 0.36 KOREA KB Financial Group 1.78 KOREA Samsung Electronics 25.36 KOREA Daewoo Engineering & Construction 0.12 KOREA KCC Corp 0.12 KOREA Samsung Electronics Pfd.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 ESG Integrated Ratings of Public Companies in Korea
    2014 ESG Integrated Ratings of public companies in Korea Korea Corporate Governance Service(KCGS) annouced 2014 ESG ratings for public companies in Korea on Aug 13. With the ESG ratings, investors may figure out the level of ESG risks that companies face and use them in making investment decision. KCGS provides four ratings for each company which consist of Environmental, Social, Governance and Integrated rating. ESG ratings by KCGS are graded into seven levels: S, A+, A, B+, B, C, D. 'S' rating means that a company has all the system and practices that the code of best practices requires and there hardly exists a possibility of damaging shareholder value due to ESG risks. 'D' rating means that there is a high possibility of damaging shareholder value due to ESG risks. Company ESG Integrated Company Name Code Rating 010950 S-Oil Corporation A+ 009150 Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. A+ 000150 DOOSAN CORPORATION A 000210 Daelim Industrial Co., Ltd. A 000810 Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. A 001300 Cheil Industries Inc. A 001450 Hyundai Marine&Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. A 005490 POSCO. A 006360 GS Engineering & Construction Corp. A 006400 SAMSUNG SDI Co., Ltd. A 010620 Hyundai Mipo Dockyard Co., Ltd. A 011070 LG Innotek Co., Ltd. A 011170 LOTTE CHEMICAL CORPORATION A 011790 SKC Co., Ltd. A 012330 HYUNDAI MOBIS A 012450 Samsung Techwin Co., Ltd. A 023530 Lotte Shopping Co., Ltd. A 028050 Samsung Engineering Co., Ltd. (SECL) A 033780 KT&G Corporation A 034020 Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Co., Ltd. A 034220 LG Display Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Its Subsidiaries NOTES to INTERIM
    Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and its Subsidiaries NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. General Information 1.1 Company Overview Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“SEC”) was incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Korea in 1969 and listed its shares on the Korea Stock Exchange in 1975. SEC and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company”) operate four business divisions: Consumer Electronics (“CE”), Information technology & Mobile communications (“IM”), Device Solutions (“DS”) and Harman. The CE division includes digital TVs, monitors, air conditioners and refrigerators and the IM division includes mobile phones, communication systems, and computers. The DS division includes products such as Memory, Foundry and System LSI in the semiconductor business (“Semiconductor”), and LCD and OLED panels in the display business (“DP”). The Harman division includes connected car systems, audio and visual products, enterprise automation solutions and connected services. The Company is domiciled in the Republic of Korea and the address of its registered office is Suwon, the Republic of Korea. These interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Korean International Financial Reporting Standards (“Korean IFRS”) 1110, Consolidated Financial Statements. SEC, as the controlling company, consolidates its 256 subsidiaries including Samsung Display and Samsung Electronics America. The Company also applies the equity method of accounting for its 41 associates, including Samsung Electro-Mechanics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Korean Financial Crisis of 1997: Onset, Turnaround, and Thereafter, Which I Originally Authored in Korean in 2006
    The Korean Financial Crisis of 1997 Onset, Turnaround, and Thereafter Public Disclosure Authorized Kyu-Sung LEE Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The Korean Financial Crisis of 1997 The Korean Financial Crisis of 1997 ONSET, TURNAROUND, AND THEREAFTER Kyu-Sung LEE © 2011 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank and the Korea Development Institute 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org All rights reserved 1 2 3 4 14 13 12 11 The findings, interpretations, and conclusions herein are those of the author and do not reflect the views of the World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorse- ment or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyosung Corporation and Subsidiaries
    Hyosung Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2014 and 2013 Hyosung Corporation and Subsidiaries Index December 31, 2014 and 2013 Page(s) Independent Auditor’s Report ........................................................................................................ 1 - 2 Consolidated Financial Statements Consolidated Statements of Financial Position....................................................................................... 3 Consolidated Statements of Income ....................................................................................................... 4 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.............................................................................. 5 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity...................................................................................... 6 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows ................................................................................................ 7 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements ..................................................................……... 8 - 97 Independent Auditor’s Report (English Translation of a Report Originally Issued in Korean) To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Hyosung Corporation We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Hyosung Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively the “Group”), which comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the consolidated
    [Show full text]
  • 1H13 Business Report
    1H13 Business Report I. Corporate Overview □ Affiliates As of end-1H 2013, Samsung Group had a total of 77 domestic affiliates. Compared to end-2012, two new affiliates (Jung-ahm Wind Power, and Sungkyunkwan University Dormitory) were added and six (SECRON, SEHF Korea, SB LiMotive, GES, Idea Company Prog, Top Cloud Corporation) were excluded. Among Samsung Group’s 77 affiliates, 17 including Samsung Electronics are listed, and 60 are unlisted. (As of June 30, 2013) No. of affiliates Name of affiliates Samsung C&T, Cheil Industries, Samsung Electronics, Samsung SDI, Samsung Techwin, Samsung Life Insurance, SEMCO, Samsung Heavy Industries, Listed 17 Samsung Card, Hotel Shilla, Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance, Samsung Securities, S1, Samsung Fine Chemicals, Samsung Engineering, Cheil Worldwide, Credu, Samsung Everland, Samsung Petrochemical, Samsung SDS, Samsung General Chemicals, Samsung Total Petrochemicals, Samsung Lions, SERI, STECO, Samsung Thales, SEMES, Living Plaza, Samsung Corning Precision Materials, Samsung SNS, Samsung Electronics Service, Samsung Electronics Logitech, Hantok Chemicals, Global Tech, CVnet Corporation, Care Camp, Allat Corp., SECUI.com, Wealthia.com, Open Tide Korea, Samsung Futures, 365Homecare, Samsung Venture Investment Corporation, Samsung Asset Management, Saengbo, Samsung Claim Unlisted 60 Adjustment Service, Anycar Service, World Cyber Games, SD Flex, Gemi Plus Distribution, Samsung Bluewings, HTSS, RAY, Songdo Land Mark City, S- Core, S1 CRM, Open Hands, S-EnPol, Samsung Medison, Samsung Biologics, Miracom Inc., Samsung Life Service, SMP, STM, SSLM, SU Materials, Colombo Korea, Samsung Display, Samsung Bioepis, Nuri Solution, Samsung Corning Advanced Glass , Natural 9, Daejung Offshore Wind Power, SERICEO, Samsung Real Estate, Jung-ahm Wind Power, Sungkyunkwan University Dormitory Total 77 ☞ Refer to 『□ Affiliates』 in 『III.
    [Show full text]
  • Korea Chaebols
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by K-Developedia(KDI School) Repository Emerging Market Spotlight November 2010 The Chaebols in South Korea: Spearheading Economic Growth South Korea has witnessed an incredible transformation in the Fast Facts three decades spanning from the Chaebols are large multinational family-controlled 1960s to 1990s, evolving from an conglomerates in South Korea, which have enjoyed strong impoverished country to a governmental support. developed high-income economy today. Often referred to as the The word Chaebol literally means “business association”. “Miracle of the Han River”, this President Park Chung Hee (1961-1979) widely propagated remarkable turnaround was and publicized the chaebol model of state-corporate achieved through an aggressive, alliance. outward-oriented strategy, focusing on developing large-scale The Chaebols have invested heavily in the export-oriented industrial conglomerates or manufacturing sector. chaebols. Some well-recognized South Korean conglomerates boasting global brand names are Samsung, Hyundai and Today, the chaebols have become LG. multinational powerhouses with a global footprint. And with this, The chaebol model of state-corporate alliance is based on South Korea boasts of an economy the Japanese Zaibatsu system, which encouraged economic that ranks 15th globally in nominal development through large business conglomerates from 1968 until the end of the World War II. terms and 13th in terms of Purchasing Power Parity (PPP). Paradigm shift in the South Korean economy The first half of the 20th century was a tumultuous, war-ravaged period for the country, punctuated by a 35-year Japanese colonization of the country, which ended with Japan’s defeat in World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Its Subsidiaries NOTES
    Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and its Subsidiaries NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. General Information 1.1 Company Overview Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“SEC”) was incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Korea in 1969 and listed its shares on the Korea Stock Exchange in 1975. SEC and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company”) operate four business divisions: Consumer Electronics (“CE”), Information technology & Mobile communications (“IM”), Device Solutions (“DS”) and Harman. The CE division includes digital TVs, monitors, air conditioners and refrigerators and the IM division includes mobile phones, communication systems, and computers. The DS division includes products such as Memory, Foundry and System LSI in the semiconductor business (“Semiconductor”), and LCD and OLED panels in the display business (“DP”). The Harman division includes connected car systems, audio and visual products, enterprise automation solutions and connected services. The Company is domiciled in the Republic of Korea and the address of its registered office is Suwon, the Republic of Korea. These interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Korean International Financial Reporting Standards (“Korean IFRS”) 1110, Consolidated Financial Statements. SEC, as the controlling company, consolidates its 252 subsidiaries including Samsung Display and Samsung Electronics America. The Company also applies the equity method of accounting for its 46 associates and joint ventures, including
    [Show full text]
  • Samsung Press Information
    Company Overview History of Samsung Samsung's history dates to 1938 when "Samsung General Stores" opened in North Kyung- sang Province, Korea. The company conducted its trade business until the 1950s when it became a producer of basic commodities such as sugar and wool. In 1958, Samsung be- came involved in the insurance industry by incorporating a local fire & marine insurance company. During the 1960s, Samsung became one of the first Korean companies to actively expand its overseas trade. The group consolidated its manufacturing base by adding paper and fer- tilizer businesses. Samsung continued with expansion into the life insurance business, strengthened its retail operations and then moved into the communications sector, success- fully establishing a newspaper and a broadcasting company. The 1970s were a crucial period in shaping present-day Samsung. Its strengths in the semi- conductor, information and telecommunications industries grew from the significant in- vestments made during this period. Samsung also took a meaningful step toward heavy industries by venturing into aircraft manufacturing, shipbuilding and construction, as well as chemical industries. In the 1980s, Samsung expanded its efforts into exploring the larger markets overseas. The group began contributing to foreign economies by building facilities in the US, the UK and Portugal. Samsung also invested considerable resources into fostering Korea's rich heritage by supporting a wide range of cultural and artistic activities. The final decade of the 20th century saw the evolution of Samsung's new approach to management. Chairman Kun-Hee Lee's insightful vision and the introduction of the "New Management" in 1993 acknowledged the need to transform management philosophy in or- der to keep up with a rapidly changing global economy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Journey Towards a Sustainable Future
    Samsung Electronics Sustainability Report 2021 A JOURNEY TOWARDS A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE A JOURNEY Our Company Environment 23 Sustainable Supply Chain 65 CEO’s Message 2 Climate Actions 25 Supply Chain Management TOWARDS Company Overview 3 Governance 25 Enabling Mutual Growth 66 Samsung Electronics Worldwide 4 Risk Management 25 Responsible Supply Chain 68 Corporate Governance 5 Reduction of GHG Emission at Worksites 27 Environmentally Responsible Supply Chain 70 A SUSTAINABLE Compliance & Ethics 7 Product Energy Efficiency 29 Responsible Minerals Sourcing 71 Business Sustainability 10 Reducing GHG Emission from Other Areas 30 FUTURE Collaborative Response to Climate Change 30 Sustainability Foundation 72 Approach to Sustainability 15 GHG Emissions 30 Circular Economy 31 Materiality Assessment 73 Sustainability Achievements 16 Efficient Use of Resources 31 Alignment With UN SDGs 74 Honors and Awards 17 Extending Product Lifespan 31 Sustainability Value Creation 75 Sustainability Management Governance 18 Take-back and Recycle of E-waste 33 Stakeholder Engagement Waste 34 Facts & Figures 76 and Communication 20 Water Resource 34 Sustainability in the Pandemic Era 21 Chemical Managemen 36 Economic Performance 77 Social Performance 78 Empowering Communities 37 Environmental Performance 81 Performance by Business Division 84 Corporate Citizenship 38 Support for Small Appendix 85 and Medium-Sized Enterprises & Startups 41 Independent Assurance Report 86 Digital Responsibility 42 Verification statement on Greenhouse Gas Emission 87 Personal Information Protection 43 GRI Index 88 Interactive User Guide Cybersecurity 45 TCFD Index 91 Samsung Electronics Sustainability Report is created in interactive PDF and allows the viewer to go directly to the AI Ethics 47 SASB Index 92 relevant websites through hyperlinks in the document.
    [Show full text]
  • March 16, 2016
    March 16, 2016 KOREA Company News & Analysis Major Indices Close Chg Chg (%) GS E&C (006360/Buy/TP: W33,000) KOSPI 1,974.90 4.93 0.25 Upbeat on orders in 1H and margins in 2H KOSPI 200 242.35 0.52 0.22 KOSDAQ 693.44 0.10 0.01 Turnover ('000 shares, Wbn) Volume Value KOSPI 289,945 4,056 KOSPI 200 72,666 3,063 KOSDAQ 586,686 2,967 Market Cap (Wbn) Value KOSPI 1,250,641 KOSDAQ 207,067 KOSPI Turnover (Wbn) Buy Sell Net Foreign 1,108 1,010 98 Institutional 866 953 -88 Retail 2,028 2,074 -46 KOSDAQ Turnover (Wbn) Buy Sell Net Foreign 188 169 19 Institutional 95 137 -42 Retail 2,682 2,650 32 Program Buy / Sell (Wbn) Buy Sell Net KOSPI 908 775 133 KOSDAQ 85 78 8 Advances & Declines Advances Declines Unchanged KOSPI 390 411 72 KOSDAQ 479 568 96 KOSPI Top 5 Most Active Stocks by Value (Wbn) Price (W) Chg (W) Value KODEX LEVERAGE 9,985 60 191 Samsung Electronics 1,256,000 3,000 173 POSCO 203,000 -7,000 153 KODEX INVERSE 8,160 -25 128 Samsung Engineering 9,950 430 109 KOSDAQ Top 5 Most Active Stocks by Value (Wbn) Price (W) Chg (W) Value Sansung P&C 36,000 950 118 Codes Combine 141,000 -10,100 101 CCS Cable TV 1,965 85 92 Celltrion 107,500 1,900 77 ILYA 13,050 2,550 62 Note: As of March 16, 2016 This document is a summary of a report prepared by Daewoo Securities Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Chaebols and Catastrophe
    Chaebols and Catastrophe: A New View of the Korean Business Groups and Their Role in the Financial Crisis Robert C. Feenstra, University of California, Davis Gary H. Hamilton, University of Washington Eun Mie Lim, University of Washington October 2001 Prepared for the Asian Economic Policy conference, Seoul, Korea, October 25-26, 2001. This paper draws upon the forthcoming book, Emergent Economics, Divergent Paths: Business Groups and Economic Organization in South Korea and Taiwan, by Robert Feenstra and Gary Hamilton, Cambridge University Press, as well as the dissertation research of Eun Mie Lim. 1. Introduction The Asian financial crisis of 1997-98 seemed to end as quickly as it began, a grande finale to the 20th century. But as the opening years of the 21st century bring another slowdown, impacting the Asian economies as well as those worldwide, it is appropriate to ask what lessons we might learn from the crisis. What policy actions, if any, should South Korea take in relation to its industrial and financial structure, and could the type of catastrophic shock that occurred in 1997-98 be experienced again? In the aftermath of the crisis, many economists in the U.S. have criticized the actions taken by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and in particular, their insistence that countries in crisis undertake contractionary monetary and fiscal policies as a condition of receiving loans. Scholars such as Jeffrey Sachs (1998) and Martin Feldstein (1998), along with Joseph Stiglitz (2000), argued that these conditions turned an initial liquidity crisis into a full-blown banking and financial crisis. A report commissioned by the U.S.
    [Show full text]