Townhouse and Low-Rise Apartment Guidelines
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
1979 Annual Report of the Toronto Transit Com Through the Farebox and Other Revenues
TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO 1979 ' I TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS JULIAN PORTER, Q.C., Chairman KARL L. MALLETIE, Vice Chairman PAUL GODFREY, Commissioner JEFFERY S. LYONS, Q.C., Commissioner ALAN TONKS, Commissioner JULIAN PORTER OFFICIALS R. MICHAEL WARREN, Chief General Manager R.M. WARREN JOHN T. HARVEY, General Manager- Operations PATRICK J. McCANN, General Manager Engineering and Construction KARL L. MALLETTE J.G. McGUFFIN JAMES G. McGUFFIN, General Secretary LLOYD 0 . MORLEY, Treasurer and Comptroller W. GRAHAM CHASE, General Counsel J.T. HARVEY PAUL GODFREY L.O. MORLEY P.J . McCANN JEFFERY S. LYONS W.G. CHASE ALANTONKS 2 June~ ; 1980 will continue to be heavily influenced by general infla Paul V. Godfrey, Chairman tion, and fare increases will probably continue to be and Members of the Council of the necessary in order to maintain a reasonable balance Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto between operating subsidies contributed by Metro Ladies and Gentlemen: Toronto and the Province, and revenue raised internally The 1979 Annual Report of the Toronto Transit Com through the farebox and other revenues. This issue has mission is presented for the approval of the Council of been addressed as part of the study undertaken by a . the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto. joint Metro-TTC task force which culminated in the 1979 was an encouraging year for the Commission. report "Transit in the 1980's: A New Direction:' Although fares were increased 16.7% in March of 1979, Improvements in the system continued to be made in more riders rode the system in 1979 than in 1978, 1979. -
1987 Annual Report
T.1.8/19 \ ' . Serving our ~iders PROFILE his report is dedicated to our riders, who have .T helped make the Toronto Transit Commission the most heavily used transportation system in Canada and the United States per capita. The TTC is an award-winning public transit Form2363/ Feb. 83 authority, created by the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Toronto Transrt Commrssion in 1954. It is responsible for public transit in Metropolitan Planning Department Toronto, which is made up of six municipalities covering Library Card 244 sq. mi. The TTC is directed by five Commissioners who are INDEXNO. T.l.8-46 appointed by Metropolitan Toronto Council. It carries 1.5 million passenger trips on an average business DATE I NAME l_ss_u_E_D-..-- RETURNED day - the equivalent of every resident taking 208 rides annu ally. With a fleet of 2, 675 buses, trolley coaches, streetcars, subway vehicles and light rapid transit vehicles, the TTC oper ates more modes of transportation than any other transit system in North America. The TTC was the first Canadian transit authority to receive an Outstanding Achievement Award from the American Public Transit Association. It has won APTA's Silver Award for passen ger and traffic safety more often than any other system in the association's history. The TTC employs about 9,300 people and has two subsidiar ies: Gray Coach Lines Limited, which operates interurban passenger and parcel bus service throughout Ontario and into the United States, and Toronto Transit Consultants Limited, which provides engineering consulting and transit expertise to clients world-wide. The TTC's operating budget is based 68 per cent on revenues acquired mostly from fares and 32 per cent on equal subsidies from Metropolitan Toronto and the Province of Ontario. -
Urban Redevelopment and Soil Movement in Toronto Prepared By
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by YorkSpace Turning The Soil: Urban Redevelopment and Soil Movement In Toronto Prepared by: Nicolas Romeo Sabo Supervisors: Dr. Peter Mulvihill and Dr. Anders Sandberg July 1, 2017 A Major Paper submitted to the Faculty of Environmental Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Environmental Studies, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Nicolas R. Sabo Peter Mulvihill and Anders Sandberg MES Candidate Supervising Professors Abstract The goal of this major paper is to determine whether Toronto’s soil remediation, transport and redevelopment regime is sustainable – or whether unforeseen and dispersed factors will someday combine to form a disaster for the city’s urban environment. In order to address this question, the paper first examines a history of the city’s brownfields: In Toronto, brownfields are broadly known as vacant or underused properties that may have been contaminated by past land use, but which show potential for redevelopment. They are also major producers of both contaminated and clean fill, and the paper examines the policies which have shaped their definition, usage, and disposal. Following an examination of the state of the art in brownfield sciences in Ontario, Canada, and globally, the focus turns to the study of disasters. Taking cues from Barry Turner’s seminal book in disaster studies Man-Made Disasters, a disaster is “an event, concentrated in time and space, which threatens a society or a relatively self-sufficient subdivision of a society with major unwanted consequences as a result of the collapse of precautions that had hitherto been culturally accepted as adequate.” A situation in which construction-related soil stockpiles are depleted to the point that cost-effectiveness of importation comes into question, or in which rising prices cause an exodus of Toronto’s building potential, can therefore be rightly termed disasters. -
General Manager Subway Construction Date
TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. S7 Meeting Date June 4, 1968 From: General Manager Subway Construction Date: June 3, 1968 QUEEN STREET SUBWAY FOR STREETCAR OPERATION The Commission, at its meeting of February 8, 1966, approved advising the City of Toronto that it was prepared to co-operate in the study of a "transit facility in the downtown section of Queen Street" and approved advising the Metropolitan Council that the Commission proposes to undertake this study at a cost of $30,000.00, it being understood that the cost involved would form part of the capital cost of the project when approved. The General Secretary transmitted the above approval of the Commission to the City Clerk in a letter dated February 22, 1966, a copy of which is attached. In a letter dated November 2, 1966, a copy of which is attached, the Commission was advised by the Metropolitan Clerk that Metropolitan Council had adopted Clause No. 2 of Report No. 16 of the Transportation Committee, headed "Proposed Queen Street Subway", as amended. The recommendation of Clause No. 2 reads as follows, "It is recommended that the Metropolitan Council formally request the Toronto Transit Commission to complete their study of the physical aspects of the Queen Street tunnel as outlined in the Commission's letter of February 22, 1966, on the understanding that the required expenditure of $30,000.00 will form part of the capital cost of the project." The amendment to Clause No. 2 reads as follows, "The matter of the Queen Street tunnel being considered in relation to the question of the Queen-Greenwood Subway." In accordance with all the foregoing, plans were developed for a "transit facility in the downtown section on Queen Street", and in addition to this a preliminary examination was made of the downtown section in relation to it becoming part of the Queen-Greenwood Subway. -
Rapid Transit in Toronto Levyrapidtransit.Ca TABLE of CONTENTS
The Neptis Foundation has collaborated with Edward J. Levy to publish this history of rapid transit proposals for the City of Toronto. Given Neptis’s focus on regional issues, we have supported Levy’s work because it demon- strates clearly that regional rapid transit cannot function eff ectively without a well-designed network at the core of the region. Toronto does not yet have such a network, as you will discover through the maps and historical photographs in this interactive web-book. We hope the material will contribute to ongoing debates on the need to create such a network. This web-book would not been produced without the vital eff orts of Philippa Campsie and Brent Gilliard, who have worked with Mr. Levy over two years to organize, edit, and present the volumes of text and illustrations. 1 Rapid Transit in Toronto levyrapidtransit.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 INTRODUCTION 7 About this Book 9 Edward J. Levy 11 A Note from the Neptis Foundation 13 Author’s Note 16 Author’s Guiding Principle: The Need for a Network 18 Executive Summary 24 PART ONE: EARLY PLANNING FOR RAPID TRANSIT 1909 – 1945 CHAPTER 1: THE BEGINNING OF RAPID TRANSIT PLANNING IN TORONTO 25 1.0 Summary 26 1.1 The Story Begins 29 1.2 The First Subway Proposal 32 1.3 The Jacobs & Davies Report: Prescient but Premature 34 1.4 Putting the Proposal in Context CHAPTER 2: “The Rapid Transit System of the Future” and a Look Ahead, 1911 – 1913 36 2.0 Summary 37 2.1 The Evolving Vision, 1911 40 2.2 The Arnold Report: The Subway Alternative, 1912 44 2.3 Crossing the Valley CHAPTER 3: R.C. -
48 Galley Ave 416.788.1823 Toronto, on Kimkehoe.Com HOODQ DETAILED REPORT™
Kim Kehoe 48 Galley Ave 416.788.1823 Toronto, ON kimkehoe.com HOODQ DETAILED REPORT™ ELEMENTARY TRANSIT SAFETY SCHOOLS 8.2 8.5 9.5 HIGH PARKS CONVENIENCE SCHOOLS 8.2 9.2 8.5 PUBLIC SCHOOLS (ASSIGNED) Your neighbourhood is part of a community of Public Schools offering Elementary, Middle, and High School programming. See the closest Public Schools near you below: 4.2 SCHOOLQ Parkdale Collegiate Institute SCORE about a 9 minute walk - 0.68 KM away High 209 Jameson Ave, Toronto, ON M6K 2Y3, Canada Parkdale has a reputation as the "gem" of our community. We are characterized by our caring, inclusive and welcoming learning environment. Our programming is continually evolving to meet the needs and interests of our students in our changing community; our diversity is our strength and we proudly welcome all students. Our programs include an enhanced PreBaccalaureate program to prepare students for our International Baccalaureate Programme, and a Specialist High Skills Major (SHSM) in Horticulture and Landscaping. We are a dynamic learning community, located with easy access to the TTC, where everyone has opportunities to get to know one another. http://www.tdsb.on.ca... Address 209 Jameson Ave, Toronto, ON M6K 2Y3, Canada Language English Date Opened 01-09-1969 Grade Level High School Type Public Phone Number 416-393-9000 School Board Toronto DSB School Number 933759 Grades Offered 9 to 12 Additional Details International Baccalaureate and Special Focus School Board Number B66052 District Description Toronto and Area Regional Office 6.6 Fern Avenue Jr and Sr Public School SCHOOLQ SCORE about a 5 minute walk - 0.35 KM away Pre-Kindergarten, Kindergarten, Elementary and Middle 128 Fern Ave, Toronto, ON M6R 1K3, Canada Fern Avenue School is located east of Roncesvalles Avenue, on Fern Avenue, north of Queen St.and south of High Park Blvd. -
Appendix 7 Investment in Independent Production
APPENDIX 7 INVESTMENT IN INDEPENDENT PRODUCTION ABRIDGED Appendix 7 - Expenditures on Programming and Development on Independent Productions in Quebec (Condition of licence 23) CBC English Television 2019-2020 SUMMARY Programming Expenditure* All Independents* Quebec independents Percentage 131,425,935 5,895,791 4.5% Development Expenditures All Independents Quebec independents Percentage #### #### 8.5% Note: * Expenses as shown in Corporation's Annual Reports to the Commission, line 5 (Programs acquired from independent producers), Direct Operation Expenses section. Appendix 7-Summary Page 1 ABRIDGED APPENDIX 7 - CANADIAN INDEPENDENT PRODUCTION EXPENDITURES - DETAILED REPORT CBC English Television 2019-2020 Program Title Expenditures* Producer / Address Producer's Province A Cure For What Hails You - 2013 #### PYRAMID PRODUCTIONS 1 INC 2875 107th Avenue S.E. Calgary Alberta Alberta Digging in the Dirt #### Back Road Productions #102 – 9955 114th Street Edmonton Alberta Alberta Fortunate Son #### 1968 Productions Inc. 2505 17TH AVE SW STE 223 CALGARY Alberta Alberta HEARTLAND S 1-7 #### Rescued Horse Season Inc. 223, 2505 - 17th Avenue SW Calgary Alberta Alberta HEARTLAND S13 #### Rescued Horse Season Inc. 223, 2505 - 17th Avenue SW Calgary Alberta Alberta HEARTLAND X #### Rescued Horse Season Inc. 223, 2505 - 17th Avenue SW Calgary Alberta Alberta HEARTLAND XII #### Rescued Horse Season Inc. 223, 2505 - 17th Avenue SW Calgary Alberta Alberta Lonely #### BRANDY Y PRODUCTIONS INC 10221 Princess Elizabeth Avenue Edmonton, Alberta Alberta Narii - Love and Fatherhood #### Hidden Story Productions Ltd. 347 Sierra Nevada Place SW Calgary Alberta T3H3M9 Alberta The Nature Of Things - A Bee's Diary #### Bee Diary Productions Inc. #27, 2816 - 34 Ave Edmonton Alberta Alberta A Shine of Rainbows #### Smudge Ventures Inc. -
Redesigning Streets for a Growing City and Better Neighbourhoods
Toronto’s Great Streets Redesigning Streets for a Growing City and Better Neighbourhoods July 2018 Toronto’s Great Streets Redesigned for Greatness Harbord Street Roncesvalles Avenue St. Clair Avenue West Bike lanes for safer mobility & village improvement Toronto placemaking at its best The streetcar neighbourhood The 2014 redesign installed continuous cycling Completed in 2011, the Roncesvalles redesign The dedicated streetcar lane, opened in 2010, has infrastructure from Ossington to Parliament, trans- focused on placemaking and people, improving safety made hopping on transit an efficient alternative to forming Harbord into one of the most well-travelled and enhancing pedestrian space while strengthening the car and has transformed this midtown corridor bike routes in the city. Roncy’s capacity to serve local needs. into a vibrant main street. Queens Quay West Market Street A street for all users A future-proof street for people (and patios!) The 2015 redesign repositioned Queens Quay as Market Street’s 2014 redesign prioritizes the pedes- a public waterfront promenade, reallocating street trian experience to support adjacent retail and space to accommodate all modes – pedestrians, restaurants while celebrating the unique heritage cyclists, transit, and cars. and culture of St. Lawrence Market. Toronto’s Great Streets 2 Toronto’s Great Streets The Ones to Watch Bloor Street King Street Downtown Yonge Street Bike lanes on Bloor from east to west Relief for Toronto’s busiest surface transit route Canada’s Main Street See (a) credit image The Bike Lane Pilot Project on Bloor Street proved to The King Street Pilot Project transformed this busy A vision to pedestrianize a busy foot traffic stretch of be a great success and the lanes are now permanent. -
Annual Report 1964
) A WAHDED '1'0 'I'ORON'I'O "rRANSIT COMMISSION fi'OH HIGH ACHIEVEMENT IN TRAFFIC AND PASSENGER SAFETY AMONG TRANSIT COMPANIES OF THI~ UNITED STATES AND CANADA SJ:i:R.VING lJHI3AN POPULATIONS OF 1,000,000 AND OVEll 1964 AMERICAN TRANSIT ASSOCIA'I'lON I Iw Toronto Transit Commission ELEVENTH ANNUAL REPORT TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO 1964 R.A.LPH C. DAY TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION FORD G. BRAND COMMISSIONERS RALPH C. DAY, Chairman CHAS. A. WALTON, Vice-Chairman FORD G. BRAND, Commissioner C. C. DOWNEY, Q.C., Commissioner DOUGLAS F. HAMILTON, Commissioner OFFICIALS J. G. INGLIS, General Manager of Operations W. H. PATERSON, General Manager-Subway Construction H. E. PETTETT, General Secretary J. G. INGUS J. H. KEARNS, Assistant General Manager of Operations J. W. H. DAY, Q.C., General Counsel R. R. GILLESPIE, Treasurer W. H. PA TERSON .July 6th, 1965. Wm. R. Allen, Esq., Q.C., Chairman, And Members of the Council of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, 67 Adelaide Street East, TORONTO 1. Ladies and Gentlemen: ANNUAL REPORT--- 1964 The Commission is pleased to submit herewith the eleventh Annual Statement of the Toronto Transit Commission covering the year 1964. A SUCCESSFUL YEAR The year 1964 was a successful one for the transit system and its passengers. Riding during the year increased by 4,187, 7 46 passengers over 1963 to a total of 275,291,000. This is the third successive year that the system has gained more customers, and in each of these years the increase has been greater than the year before. -
Canadian National Exhibition, Toronto, Friday, August 23Rd to Saturday
IOCUE 4 PR ldudincj SPORTS Activitie* T c £<fAUG.23toSEPT 7, 1935 t JfcO^V*57 INCLUSIVE »">'jnIW l'17' '.vir^diii IBITION TORONTO The EDITH and LORNE PIERCE COLLECTION o/CANADIANA TORONTO MONTREAL REGIXA HALIFAX PLAN OF GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS CANADIAN NATIONAL EXHIBITION "Be Foot Happy" World's Famous Hot Pavements Athletes Use Long Walks Hard Floors are unkind to Your Feet OLYMPEME Not an the Antiseptic Lihimekt Olympene is kind Ordinary Liniment An Antiseptic Liniment Recommended Especia lly OSCAR ROETTGER, Player Manager, Montreal Royal Baseball. for Athlete's Foot. The Athlete's Liniment. JIM WEAVER, Pitcher, Newark Bears Baseball. For Soreness, Stiffness of Muscles and Joints- . ' W. J " Bill ' O'BRIEN, Montreal Maroons, Montreal. Strains and Sprains- RUTH DOWNING, Toronto. Abscesses, Boils, Pimples and Sores. "Torchy" Vancouver, Six Day Bicycle Cuts and Bruises. PEDEN, Rider. Nervousness and Sleeplessness. BERNARD STUBECKE, Germany, Six Day Bicycle Head Colds, Catarrh and Hay Fever- Rider. RUTH DOWNING Corns, Bunions, Sore or Swollen Feet- FRED BULLIVENT, Head Trainer, Six Day Bicycle Toronto's Sweetheart of the Swim Riders. Sunburn, Poison Ivy, Insect Bites Says Use JIM McMILLEN, Wrestler, Vice-President, Chicago Dandruff. Bears. GEORGE "Todger" ANDERSON, Hamilton, Manufactured by OLYMPENE Assoc. -Coach, Hamilton Olympic Club. NORTHROP & LYMAN CO., LIMITED OLYMPEME Trainer, Bert Pearson, Sprinter. TORONTO ONTARIO the Antiseptic Liniment Established 1854 the Antiseptic Lininent Canadian "National Exhibition :@#^: Fifty-Seventh Annual -
September-1-2020-Notice-Updates
Construction Notice September 1, 2020 Upcoming Infrastructure Improvements at the Intersection of King Street West, Queen Street West, The Queensway and Roncesvalles Avenue (KQQR) Contract: 20ECS-TI-19SP Start Date: September 8, 2020 End Date: August 2022 *Timeline is subject to change. The City of Toronto and Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) have coordinated various infrastructure upgrades at the King Street West, Queen Street West, The Queensway and Roncesvalles Avenue (KQQR) Intersection, The Queensway from Parkside Drive to Roncesvalles Avenue, Roncesvalles Avenue from Queen Street West to Dundas Street West and rehabilitation of the Parkside Drive bridge at The Queensway. The infrastructure improvements will start in September 2020 with underside bridge rehabilitation of the Parkside Drive Bridge at The Queensway. The remaining work starting in 2021 includes: Topside bridge rehabilitation of the Parkside Drive bridge at The Queensway Replacing watermain and relining combined and storm sewers Road reconstruction and sidewalk replacement Overhead wire replacement and reconstruction of the TTC track allowance and platforms Relocating streetcar stops Reconfiguring the KQQR intersection including: removal of the eastbound right-turn channel, removal of the centre TTC platform on The Queensway, a dedicated streetcar lane, left-turn lane, through lane and right-turn lane on the eastbound approach, new raised TTC platform/bicycle facility on Queen Street West and realignment of the northbound approach on King Street West Completing -
TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT No S7 MEETING DATE
TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT No S7 MEETING DATE June 4, 1968 FROM: General Manager Subway Construction Date June 3, 1968 Subject: QUEEN STREET SUBWAY FOR STREETCAR OPERATION The Commission, at its meeting of February 8, 1966, approved advising the City of Toronto that it was prepared to co-operate in the study of a "transit facility in the downtown section of Queen Street" and approved advising the Metropolitan Council that the Commission proposes to undertake this study at a cost of $30,000.00, it being understood that the cost involved would form part of the capital cost of the project when approved. The General Secretary transmitted the above approval of the Commission to the City Clerk in a letter dated February 22, 1966, a copy of which is attached. In a letter dated November 2, 1966, a copy of which is attached, the Commission was advised by the Metropolitan Clerk that Metropolitan Council had adopted Clause No. 2 of Report No. 16 of the Transportation Committee, headed "Proposed Queen Street Subway", as amended. The recommendation of Clause No. 2 reads as follows, "It is recommended that the Metropolitan Council formally request the Toronto Transit Commission to complete their study of the physical aspects of the Queen Street tunnel as outlined in the Commission's letter of February 22, 1966, on the understanding that the required expenditure of $30,000.00 will form part of the capital cost of the project." The amendment to Clause No. 2 reads as follows, "The matter of the Queen Street tunnel being considered in relation to the question of the Queen-Greenwood Subway." In accordance with all the foregoing, plans were developed for a "transit facility in the downtown section on Queen Street", and in addition to this a preliminary examination was made of the downtown section in relation to it becoming part of the Queen-Greenwood Subway.