Making Space for Critical Race Theory Within Therapeutic Settings
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
MAKING SPACE FOR CRITICAL RACE THEORY WITHIN THERAPEUTIC SETTINGS: UNDERSTANDING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF RACE IN SERVING RACIAL AND ETHNIC WOMEN MINORITIES ________________________________________________________ A Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia ________________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctorate of Philosophy _________________________________________________________ by ERICA CAMPBELL Dr. Treva Lindsey and Dr. J. Wilson Watt, Dissertation Supervisors JULY 2013 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled MAKING SPACE FOR CRITICAL RACE THEORY WITHIN THERAPEUTIC SETTINGS: UNDERSTANDING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF RACE IN SERVING RACIAL AND ETHNIC WOMEN MINORITIES presented by Erica Campbell, a candidate for the degree of doctor of philosophy, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Associate Professor J. Wilson Watt Assistant Professor Treva Lindsey Professor Marjorie Sable Assistant Professor Mansoo Yu ii Acknowledgements I am forever grateful to those who have helped me during this process. Throughout the years I received the chance to build relationships with many generous and inspiring individuals, whom I cherish for their contribution to my work and development as a scholar. This has truly been a challenging yet enlightening experience. I would like to thank God for His grace, blessing and mercy that have allowed me to conquer this journey in life. I am eternally grateful for my parents and grandparent, Tracy Tenner, Larrone Rodgers and Betty Crump for their continuous encouragement, words of wisdom, prayers, unconditional love, and support. I extend a special thank you to the members of my doctoral committee (Dr. Treva Lindsey, Dr. Wilson Watt, Dr. Mansoo Yu and Dr. Marjorie Sable) for their thoughtful criticism, time and attention. A special thanks to Dr. Yu for his generosity, dedication and assistance throughout this process. I would like to express the deepest appreciation and gratitude to my mentor and doctoral committee Co-Chair Dr. Treva Lindsey, who has been an amazing, inspirational, brilliant role model. Without her guidance, support and persistent help this dissertation would not have been possible. I would also like to thank the network of supportive, forgiving and generous individuals in my life: Dr. James Hunter, Dr. Michael Kelly, Dr. Joan Hermsen, Dr. Mary Jo Neitz, Shelda Eggers (MU’s Women’s and Gender Department), my family, friends and colleagues. iii Table of Contents Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………....ii Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………….....vii Chapter 1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………….1 1. Problem Statement: Transforming Racial & Ethnic Society………………………1 2. Social Work’s need for a Racial & Ethnic inclusive framework..……………....…3 Chapter 2 Review of Literature………………………………………………………….…..6 1. Domestic Violence……………………………………………………………........6 1.1. Definition………………………………………………………………......….6 1.2. Scope of Problem………………………………………………………….......6 2. Reality of Domestic Violence for racial & ethnic minority women...…………….10 2.1. Black/African Americans……………………………………………………..10 2.2. Native Americans……………………………...……………………………...13 2.3. Asians……………………………………………………………………..…..14 2.4. Latinas………………………………………………………………………...16 3. Societal Trauma, Racial Oppression & Mistrust………………………….…….…17 3.1. Black/African Americans……………………………………………………..17 3.2. Native Americans……………………………………………………………..22 3.3. Asians………………………………………………………………………....24 3.4. Latinas………………………………………………………………………...26 4. Social Work and Domestic Violence…….………………………………………..29 5. “Cultural” Standards of Social Work……………………………………………. ....31 5.1 Self-Awareness………………………………………………………………...33 5.2 Cultural Knowledge...……………………………………………………….…33 5.3 Cultural Skills……..…………………………………………………………...34 6. Cultural Competency Model………………………...……………………………..35 6.1 Examining the Cultural Competency Model………..………….……………...37 6.2 Shortcomings of the Cultural Competency Model..….………………………..41 6.3 Additional critiques……………………………………………………………44 7. Critical Race Theory (CRT)………………………………………………………...45 7.1 Historical Development………………………………………………………..45 7.2 Examining CRT.............................................................................................….46 7.4 Conceptualizing Race, Ethnicity & Culture………..………………………….48 7.5 Six Principles of CRT……...…………………………………………………..53 7.6 Consciousness Raising………..………………………………………………..58 iv 7.7 Deconstructing Color-blindness……………………..………………………...58 7.8 Black Feminism & Afrocentricism……..……………………………………. 63 7.9 Racial Justice & Equality……..……………………………………………….64 8. Intersectionality...…………………………….………………………………….….65 Chapter 3 Research Design and Methodology.....…………..……………..……………….70 9. Research Question………………………..………………………………………..70 10. Methods………………………………………………………………………..…70 10.1 Population and Sample Selection……………………………………….…….70 10.2 Sample Characteristics………………………………………………….…….72 Figure 1………………………………………………………………………..73 10.3 Variables………………………………………………………………………74 11. Measurements………………………………………..……………………………74 11.1 Critical Race Theory Measurement (CRTM)……………………………...…74 11.2 The Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measurement (MEIM)……………………...75 11.3 Racial Attitudes Questionnaire……………………………………………….76 11.4 Knowledge of Domestic Violence……..……………………………………..77 11.5 Demographic Questionnaire………………………………………………….78 12. Pilot Study………………………………………………………………………...78 13. Data Analysis Plan………………………………………………………….….….79 Chapter 4 Results…………………………………………………………………………….81 14.1 Descriptive Information: Critical Racial Theory…….…………………….…….81 Figure 2.1……………………………………………………………………...81 Figure 2.2……………………………………………………………………...84 Figure 2.3……………………………………………………………………...85 Figure 2.4……………………………………………………………………...86 Figure 2.5………………………………………………………………….…..88 Figure 2.6……………………………………………………………………...89 Figure 3………………………………………………………………………..83 14.2 Descriptive Information: Ethnic Identity.……………………………………….91 Figure 4………………………………………………………………………..90 14.3 Descriptive Information: Racial Attitudes……….………………………….….93 Figure 5…………………………………………………………………….….93 14.4 Descriptive Information: Knowledge of Domestic Violence…..…...……….... ..94 Figure 6………………………………………………………………………...95 Figure 7…………………………………………………………………….…..97 v 15. Associations between Ethnic Identity, Racial Attitudes, Knowledge of Domestic Violence, Race, Sex and Critical Race Theory……......98 Figure 8……………………………………………………………………….99 16. Results of Research Questions…………………………………………………...101 Figure 9………………………………………………………………………102 Figure 10……………………………………………………………………..103 Figure 11……………………………………………………………………..105 Figure 12……………………………………………………………………..109 Chapter 5 Discussion…………………………………………………………………….….113 17. Summary of Results………………………………………………………………113 18. Summary of Research Questions…………………………………………………118 18. Limitations of Study………………………………………………………..……..119 19. Implications for Practice……………………………………………………..........121 20. Implications for Research…………………………………………………………126 21. Contributions to the field of Critical Race Theory………………………………..128 22. Contribution to Social Work Education…………………………………………..130 References……………………..…………………………………………………………….138 Appendices…………………………………..………..…………………………………..…168 Appendix A: Recruitment Email Letter………………………………………..…168 Appendix B: Critical Race Theory Measurement………………………..…….....169 Appendix C: Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measurement……………………...…...178 Appendix D: Racial Attitudes Questionnaire……………………………………..173 Appendix E: Knowledge of Domestic Violence Measurement….……………….174 Appendix E: Demographic Questionnaire……………………………………..…174 Vita…………………………………………………………………………………………..176 vi List of Tables Table 1: Sample Characteristics: Frequencies and Percentages……………………………161 Table 2: Critical Race Theory: Descriptive Information…………………………………...162 Table 3: Chi-Square Bivariate Analysis: CRT and Race…………………………………...163 Table 4: Ethnic Identity: Descriptive Information …………………………………………164 Table 5: Chi-Square Bivariate Analysis: Ethnic Identity and Race…………………….…..165 Table 6: Mann-Whitney U Test: Racial Attitudes and Race……………………………….166 Table 7: Knowledge of Domestic Violence: Descriptive Information …………………….167 Table 8: Chi-Square Bivariate Analysis: Knowledge of Domestic Violence and Race……168 Table 9: Multiple Regression Analysis: Significant Associations between (IV’s) Ethnic Identity, Racial Attitudes, Knowledge of Domestic Violence and (DV) Critical Race Theory…………………….………………………………169 Table 10: Chi-square Bivariate Analysis: Levels of Awareness of six aspects of Critical Race Theory between white and non-white practitioners…………………………170 Table 11: Correlations between the IV’s: ethnic identity, racial attitudes and knowledge of domestic violence and the six aspects of Critical Race Theory (DV)…………..171 Table 12: Multiple Regression Analysis 1: Relative Contributions of the IV’s: ethnic identity, racial attitudes and knowledge of domestic violence to the six aspects of Critical Race Theory (DV)…………………………………………..…172 Table 13: Multiple Regression Analysis 2: Relative Contributions of the IV’s: ethnic identity, racial attitudes and knowledge of domestic violence to the six aspects of Critical Race Theory (DV)…………………………………………..…173 Table 14: Multiple Regression Analysis 3: Relative Contributions of the IV’s: ethnic identity and racial attitudes to the six aspects of Critical Race Theory (DV)………………………………………………………...174 vii Abstract The U.S. is