DOCSLIB.ORG

1) BRACE Protocol V10.1 Date 10Dec2020 CLEAN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1) BRACE Protocol V10.1 Date 10Dec2020 CLEAN PROTOCOL RCH HREC /protocol no: 62586 NCT04327206 BCG vaccination to Reduce the impact of COVID -19 in healthcare workers (BRACE) Trial Version 10.1, 10 December 2020 CONFIDENTIAL This protocol is confidential and is the property of Murdoch Children’s Research Institute. No part of it may be transmitted, reproduced, published, or used without prior written authorisation from the institution. Statement of Compliance This clinical trial will be conducted in compliance with all stipulation of this protocol, the conditions of the ethics committees approvals, andthe Integrated Addendum to ICH E6 (R1): Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6 (R2), dated 9 November 2016. In Australia, this trial will also be conducted in compliance with with the NHMRC National Statement on ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007 and all updates), the Integrated Addendum to ICH E6 (R1): Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6 (R2), dated 9 November 2016 annotated with TGA comments and the NHMRC guidance Safety monitoring and reporting in clinical trials involving therapeutic goods (EH59, 2016). This clinical trial is not sponsored by any pharmaceutical company or other commercial entity. CONTENTS PROTOCOL SYNOPSIS ................................................................................................................. 6 Primary objectives ...................................................................................................................... 6 Secondary objectives .................................................................................................................. 6 GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................. 10 INVESTIGATOR AGREEMENT .................................................................................................... 11 1. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION .................................................................................... 12 1.1. Trial registration .............................................................................................................. 12 1.2. Overall Sponsor ............................................................................................................... 12 1.3. Expected duration of study ............................................................................................. 12 1.4. Stakeholder involvement ................................................................................................ 12 2. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ............................................................................... 12 2.1. Trial rationale and aim .................................................................................................... 12 2.2. Background ..................................................................................................................... 13 2.3. Risk/Benefit assessment .................................................................................................. 15 2.3.1. Known potential risks ...................................................................................................... 15 2.3.2. Known potential benefits ................................................................................................ 19 2.3.3. Assessment of potential risks and benefits ..................................................................... 19 3 TRIAL OBJECTIVES AND OUTCOMES ................................................................................ 20 3.1 Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 20 3.1.1 Primary objective ............................................................................................................ 20 3.1.2 Secondary objectives ....................................................................................................... 20 3.1.3 Planned exploratory analyses .......................................................................................... 21 3.2 Outcomes ........................................................................................................................ 22 3.3 Overall design .................................................................................................................. 25 3.4 Justification for dose ....................................................................................................... 26 3.5 Trial population ............................................................................................................... 27 4.3.1 Eligibility criteria .............................................................................................................. 27 4.3.2 Inclusion criteria .............................................................................................................. 27 4.3.3 Exclusion criteria ............................................................................................................. 27 4.4 Lifestyle considerations ................................................................................................... 29 4.5 Screen failures ................................................................................................................. 29 4.6 Recruitment and Consent ............................................................................................... 29 4.7 Pre-randomisation blood sample .................................................................................... 30 4.8 Re-consent ...................................................................................................................... 30 4 INTERVENTION ................................................................................................................ 31 4.1 Treatment arms ............................................................................................................... 31 4.2 Trial Intervention(s) ......................................................................................................... 31 4.2.1 Description of trial investigational products ................................................................... 31 4.2.1.1 BCG vaccine SSI ...................................................................................................... 31 5.2.1.2 Placebo to match BCG vaccine SSI ............................................................................... 31 4.2.2 Dosage ............................................................................................................................. 32 4.2.3 Dose modification ........................................................................................................... 32 4.2.4 Storage and dispensing of BCG vaccine SSI ..................................................................... 32 4.2.5 Preparation ..................................................................................................................... 32 4.2.6 Administration of trial drug ............................................................................................. 33 4.2.7 Product accountability .................................................................................................... 35 4.2.8 Excluded medications and treatments ............................................................................ 35 4.2.9 Discontinuation from trial intervention .......................................................................... 35 5 RANDOMISATION AND BLINDING ................................................................................... 35 5.1 Concealment mechanism ................................................................................................ 36 6 TRIAL VISITS AND PROCEDURES ...................................................................................... 37 6.1 Trial timeline ................................................................................................................... 37 6.2 Schedule of assessments ................................................................................................. 38 6.3 Description of procedures ............................................................................................... 38 6.4 Notes on specific trial visits ............................................................................................. 42 6.4.1 Unscheduled visit ............................................................................................................ 42 6.5 Procedure discontinuation, participant withdrawals and losses to follow up ................ 42 6.5.1 Discontinuation of blood collection - participant remains in trial for follow up ............. 42 6.5.2 Withdrawal of consent - participant withdraws from all trial participation .................... 42 6.5.3 Losses to follow-up .......................................................................................................... 42 6.5.4 Replacements .................................................................................................................. 43 6.5.5 Trial Completion .............................................................................................................. 43 6.5.6 Continuation of therapy .................................................................................................. 43 7 SAFETY MONITORING AND REPORTING .......................................................................... 44 7.1 Definitions ......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Considerations for Causality Assessment of Neurological And
    Occasional essay J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp-2021-326924 on 6 August 2021. Downloaded from Considerations for causality assessment of neurological and neuropsychiatric complications of SARS- CoV-2 vaccines: from cerebral venous sinus thrombosis to functional neurological disorder Matt Butler ,1 Arina Tamborska,2,3 Greta K Wood,2,3 Mark Ellul,4 Rhys H Thomas,5,6 Ian Galea ,7 Sarah Pett,8 Bhagteshwar Singh,3 Tom Solomon,4 Thomas Arthur Pollak,9 Benedict D Michael,2,3 Timothy R Nicholson10 For numbered affiliations see INTRODUCTION More severe potential adverse effects in the open- end of article. The scientific community rapidly responded to label phase of vaccine roll- outs are being collected the COVID-19 pandemic by developing novel through national surveillance systems. In the USA, Correspondence to SARS- CoV-2 vaccines (table 1). As of early June Dr Timothy R Nicholson, King’s roughly 372 adverse events have been reported per College London, London WC2R 2021, an estimated 2 billion doses have been million doses, which is a lower rate than expected 1 2LS, UK; timothy. nicholson@ administered worldwide. Neurological adverse based on the clinical trials.6 kcl. ac. uk events following immunisation (AEFI), such as In the UK, adverse events are reported via the cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and demyelin- MB and AT are joint first Coronavirus Yellow Card reporting website. As of ating episodes, have been reported. In some coun- authors. early June 2021, approximately 250 000 Yellow tries, these have led to the temporary halting of BDM and TRN are joint senior Cards have been submitted, equating to around authors.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of COVID Vaccine Clinical Trial Results & Some Challenges
    An overview of COVID vaccine clinical trial results & some challenges DCVMN Webinar December 8th, 2020 Access to COVID-19 tools ACCESSACCESS TO TOCOVID-19 COVID-19 TOOLS TOOLS (ACT) (ACT) ACCELERATOR ACCELERATOR (ACT) accelerator A GlobalA GlobalCollaboration Collaboration to Accelerate tothe AccelerateDevelopment, the Production Development, and Equitable Production Access to New and Equitable AccessCOVID-19 to New diagnostics, COVID-19 therapeutics diagnostics, and vaccines therapeutics and vaccines VACCINES DIAGNOSTICS THERAPEUTICS (COVAX) Development & Manufacturing Led by CEPI, with industry Procurement and delivery at scale Led by Gavi Policy and allocation Led by WHO Key players SOURCE: (ACT) ACCELERATOR Commitment and Call to Action 24th April 2020 ACT-A / COVAX governance COVAX COORDINATION MEETING CEPI Board Co-Chair: Jane Halton Co-Chair: Dr. Ngozi Gavi Board Workstream leads + DCVMN and IFPMA-selected Reps As needed – R&D&M Chair; COVAX IPG Chair Development & Manufacturing Procurement and delivery Policy and allocation (COVAX) at scale Led by (with industry) Led by Led by R&D&M Investment Committee COVAX Independent Product Group Technical Review Group Portfolio Group Vaccine Teams SWAT teams RAG 3 COVAX SWAT teams are being set up as a joint platform to accelerate COVID- 19 Vaccine development and manufacturing by addressing common challenges together Timely and targeted Multilateral Knowledge-based Resource-efficient Addresses specific cross- Establishes a dialogue Identifies and collates Coordinates between developer technical and global joint effort most relevant materials different organizations/ challenges as they are across different COVID-19 and insights across the initiatives to limit raised and/or identified vaccines organizations broader COVID-19 duplications and ensure on an ongoing basis (incl.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene-Based Vaccines (GBV)
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 170 (2021) 113–141 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/addr Advances in gene-based vaccine platforms to address the COVID-19 pandemic Deborah Pushparajah a,1, Salma Jimenez a,c,1,ShirleyWonga,HibahAlattasa, Nafiseh Nafissi b, Roderick A. Slavcev a,b,c,⁎ a School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, 10A Victoria St S, Kitchener N2G 1C5, Canada b Mediphage Bioceuticals, 661 University Avenue, Suite 1300, Toronto, ON, M5G 0B7, Canada c Theraphage, 151 Charles St W Suite # 199, Kitchener, ON, N2G 1H6, Canada article info abstract Article history: The novel betacoronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2), has spread across Received 1 October 2020 the globe at an unprecedented rate since its first emergence in Wuhan City, China in December 2019. Scientific Received in revised form 23 December 2020 communities around the world have been rigorously working to develop a potent vaccine to combat COVID-19 Accepted 1 January 2021 (coronavirus disease 2019), employing conventional and novel vaccine strategies. Gene-based vaccine platforms Available online 7 January 2021 based on viral vectors, DNA, and RNA, have shown promising results encompassing both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses in previous studies, supporting their implementation for COVID-19 vaccine de- Keywords: Coronavirus velopment. In fact, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently authorized the emergency use of two COVID-19 RNA-based COVID-19 vaccines. We review current gene-based vaccine candidates proceeding through clinical SARS-CoV-2 trials, including their antigenic targets, delivery vehicles, and route of administration.
    [Show full text]
  • En Este Número
    Boletín Científico No. 18 (1-10 julio/2021) EN ESTE NÚMERO VacCiencia es una publicación dirigida a Resumen de candidatos vacu- investigadores y especialistas dedicados a nales contra la COVID-19 ba- la vacunología y temas afines, con el ob- sadas en la plataforma de sub- jetivo de serle útil. Usted puede realizar unidad proteica en desarrollo a sugerencias sobre los contenidos y de es- nivel mundial. (segunda parte) ta forma crear una retroalimentación Artículos científicos más que nos permita acercarnos más a sus recientes de Medline sobre necesidades de información. vacunas. Patentes más recientes en Patentscope sobre vacunas. Patentes más recientes en USPTO sobre vacunas. 1| Copyright © 2020. Todos los derechos reservados | INSTITUTO FINLAY DE VACUNAS Resumen de vacunas contra la COVID-19 basadas en la plataforma de subunidad proteica en desarrollo a nivel mundial (segunda parte) Las vacunas de subunidades antigénicas son aquellas en las que solamente se utilizan los fragmentos específicos (llamados «subunidades antigénicas») del virus o la bacteria que es indispensable que el sistema inmunitario reconozca. Las subunidades antigénicas suelen ser proteínas o hidratos de carbono. La mayoría de las vacunas que figuran en los calendarios de vacunación infantil son de este tipo y protegen a las personas de enfermedades como la tos ferina, el tétanos, la difteria y la meningitis meningocócica. Este tipo de vacunas solo incluye las partes del microorganismo que mejor estimulan al sistema inmunitario. En el caso de las desarrolladas contra la COVID-19 contienen generalmente, la proteína S o fragmentos de la misma como el Dominio de Unión al Receptor (RBD, por sus siglas en inglés).
    [Show full text]
  • Heterologous Prime-Boost COVID-19 Vaccination: Initial Reactogenicity Data
    Correspondence Heterologous (100 participants with additional 24 (21%) of 112 recipients of BNT for prime-boost COVID-19 visits), at baseline (before the prime both prime and boost (difference 21%, dose), at day 28 (before the boost 95% CI 8–33%). Similar increases were Published Online vaccination: initial dose) and 7 days post-boost, graded observed for chills, fatigue, headache, May 12, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/ according to a modified US Food joint pain, malaise, and muscle ache reactogenicity data S0140-6736(21)01115-6 and Drug Administration toxicity (figure; appendix). There were no There is significant international scale (appendix). All analyses are hospitalisations due to solicited See Online for appendix interest in heterologous prime-boost descriptive, as the study was not symptoms, and most of this increase in COVID-19 vaccination to mitigate powered for reactogenicity, with reactogenicity was observed in the 48 h against supply shocks or shortages endpoints reported as frequencies and after immunisation (appendix). that might otherwise reduce the speed percentages, together with absolute Participants were advised that of vaccine roll-out. Additionally, in differences between heterologous and paracetamol might reduce vaccine light of changing recommendations homologous vaccine schedules and side-effects but were not actively coun- regarding use of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 corresponding 95% CIs. selled to medicate prophylactically. (ChAd) COVID-19 vaccine (Vaxzevria, Recruitment commenced on Paracetamol use in the 48 h post-boost AstraZeneca), several countries are now Feb 11, 2021, and was completed on vaccine was reported by 40 (36%) of advising that individuals previously Feb 26, 2021, with 830 participants 112 recipients of ChAd for both prime primed with this vaccine should now enrolled and randomised from and boost, 63 (57%) of 110 recipients receive an alternative vaccine as 978 screened (the CONSORT flow of ChAd for prime and BNT for boost, their second dose, most commonly diagram is available in the appendix).
    [Show full text]
  • Immunogenicity and Reactogenicity of a Heterologous COVID-19 Prime-Boost Vaccination Compared with Homologous Vaccine Regimens
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.13.21258859; this version posted June 15, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a heterologous COVID-19 prime-boost vaccination compared with homologous vaccine regimens Tina Schmidt1, Verena Klemis1,§, David Schub1,§, Janine Mihm2, Franziska Hielscher1, Stefanie Marx1, Amina Abu-Omar1, Sophie Schneitler3, Sören L. Becker3, Barbara C. Gärtner3, Urban Sester2, and Martina Sester1;* 1Department of Transplant and Infection Immunology, 2Department of Internal Medicine IV, 3Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Saarland University, 66421 Homburg, Germany. §these authors contributed equally *Correspondence: Martina Sester, PhD, Saarland University, Department of Transplant and Infection Immunology, Institutes of Infection Medicine, building 47, Kirrberger Straße, D- 66421 Homburg, Germany; email: [email protected] Abstract Heterologous priming with the ChAdOx1-nCoV-19 vector-vaccine followed by boosting with an mRNA-vaccine is currently recommended in Germany, although data on immunogenicity and reactogenicity are not available. Here we show that the heterologous regimen induced spike-specific IgG, neutralizing antibodies, and spike-specific CD4 T-cells, which were significantly more pronounced than after homologous vector boost, and higher or comparable in magnitude to the homologous mRNA regimens. Moreover, spike-specific CD8 T-cell levels after heterologous vaccination were significantly higher than after both homologous regimens. Cytokine expression profiling showed a predominance of polyfunctional T-cells expressing IFNγ, TNFα and IL-2 with subtle differences between regimens.
    [Show full text]
  • Immunogenicity and in Vivo Protection of a Variant Nanoparticle Vaccine That Confers Broad
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.08.447631; this version posted June 9, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Immunogenicity and In vivo protection of a variant nanoparticle vaccine that confers broad protection against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants James Logue1*, Robert Johnson1*, Nita Patel2, Bin Zhou2, Sonia Maciejewski2, Haixia Zhou2, Alyse Portnoff2, Jing-Hui Tian2, Marisa McGrath1, Robert Haupt1, Stuart Weston1, Holly 1 2 1 2 2 Hammond , Mimi Guebre-Xabier , Carly Dillen , Joyce Plested , Shane Cloney-Clark , Ann M Greene2, Mike Massare2, Greg Glenn2, Gale Smith2, Matthew Frieman1 1. The Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201. 2. Novavax, Inc. 21 Firstfield Road, Gaithersburg, MD 20878. *These authors contributed equally Abstract The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to spread globally. As SARS-CoV-2 has transmitted from person to person, variant viruses have emerged with elevated transmission rates and higher risk of infection for vaccinees. We present data showing that a recombinant prefusion-stabilized Spike (rS) protein based on the B.1.351 sequence (rS-B.1.351) was highly immunogenic in mice and produced neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2/WA1, B.1.1.7, and B.1.351. Mice vaccinated with our prototype vaccine NVX-CoV2373 (rS-WU1) or rS-B.1.351 alone, in combination, or as a heterologous prime boost, were protected when challenged with live SARS-CoV-2/B.1.1.7 or SARS-CoV-2/B.1.351.
    [Show full text]
  • An Immunogenicity Report for the Comparison Between Heterologous and Homologous Prime-Boost Schedules with Chadox1-S and Bnt162b2 Vaccines
    Journal of Clinical Medicine Article An Immunogenicity Report for the Comparison between Heterologous and Homologous Prime-Boost Schedules with ChAdOx1-S and BNT162b2 Vaccines Alexandre Vallée 1,* , Marc Vasse 2,3 , Laurence Mazaux 2, Brigitte Bonan 4, Carline Amiel 5, Sara Zia-Chahabi 2, Aurélie Chan-Hew-Wai 4, Eric Farfour 2 , Eve Camps 4, Pauline Touche 1, Flavie Barret 1, François Parquin 6, David Zucman 7 and Erwan Fourn 7 1 Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Foch Hospital, 92150 Suresnes, France; [email protected] (P.T.); [email protected] (F.B.) 2 Biology Department, Foch Hospital, 92150 Suresnes, France; [email protected] (M.V.); [email protected] (L.M.); [email protected] (S.Z.-C.); [email protected] (E.F.) 3 INSERM, UMR-S1176, Université Paris-Saclay, 94000 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France 4 Hospital Pharmacy, Foch Hospital, 92150 Suresnes, France; [email protected] (B.B.); [email protected] (A.C.-H.-W.); [email protected] (E.C.) 5 Service de Médecine du Travail, 92150 Suresnes, France; [email protected] 6 Thoracic Intensive Care Unit, Foch Hospital, 92150 Suresnes, France; [email protected] 7 Réseau Ville-Hôpital, Service de Médecine Interne, Foch Hospital, 92150 Suresnes, France; [email protected] (D.Z.); [email protected] (E.F.) Citation: Vallée, A.; Vasse, M.; * Correspondence: [email protected] Mazaux, L.; Bonan, B.; Amiel, C.; Zia-Chahabi, S.; Chan-Hew-Wai, A.; Abstract: Background: There is a small amount of immunological data on COVID-19 heterologous Farfour, E.; Camps, E.; Touche, P.; et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Irnela Bajrovic 2020 the Dissertation Committee for Irnela Bajrovic Certifies That This Is the Approved Version of the Following Dissertation
    Copyright by Irnela Bajrovic 2020 The Dissertation Committee for Irnela Bajrovic Certifies that this is the approved version of the following Dissertation: Development and Characterization of Thermostable Thin Films as a Novel Vaccine Dosage Form Committee: Maria A. Croyle, Supervisor Hugh D. Smyth Debadyuti Ghosh Jennifer A. Maynard Charles R. Middaugh For my parents Džemal and Rahima, and my sister, Minela without whom none of this would have been possible. Acknowledgements I joined Dr. Maria Cryole’s lab in 2014 as an undergraduate student hoping to gain some research experience and learn about vaccine delivery. Little did I know that one semester would turn into six years and two degrees that have forever changed my life for the better. First and foremost, I would like to thank Dr. Croyle for giving me the guidance and support to learn and grow as a scientist. I will treasure the time we spent together and everything I learned from her. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. Hugh Smyth, Dr. Debadyuti Ghosh, Dr. Jennifer Maynard, and Dr. Charles Middaugh for their guidance, support, and encouragement. Special thanks to Stephen Schafer who served as great sounding board and brainstorm partner. To past and present Croyle lab members Dr. Kristina Jonsson-Schmunk, Trang Doan, and Matthew Le, I also say thank you. Your advice and support contributed to the completion of the projects in this document and I am grateful for the friendships we have built. I would also like to thank my family for always encouraging me and reminding me that I am capable of anything I set my mind to.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccination and Multiple Sclerosis in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp-2021-326839 on 5 August 2021. Downloaded from Occasional essay Vaccination and multiple sclerosis in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic Tobias Monschein ,1 Hans- Peter Hartung,1,2 Tobias Zrzavy ,1 Michael Barnett ,3 Nina Boxberger,4 Thomas Berger,1 Jeremy Chataway,5 Amit Bar- Or,6 Paulus Stefan Rommer ,1,4 Uwe K. Zettl4 24 ► Additional supplemental INTRODUCTION higher binding affinity. On entering the respira- material is published online In the last century, several pandemics were caused tory epithelial cells, SARS-CoV -2 starts replicating only. To view, please visit by various influenza virus subtypes, with the Spanish and spreading rapidly until it reaches the alveolar the journal online (http:// dx. 1 doi. org/ 10. 1136/ jnnp- 2021- influenza of 1918–1920 being the most severe. epithelial cells of the lung. Hence, a robust innate 326839). Coronaviruses were first described in humans in immune response is triggered.25 The spike protein the 1960s, and since then seven human pathogenic is recognised by pattern recognition receptors For numbered affiliations see coronaviruses have been described.2 The first severe and leads, via downstream signalling, to increased end of article. outbreak was in 2002 with the severe acute respira- interferon production by innate immune cells. Antigen- specific adaptive immunity is critical for Correspondence to tory syndrome coronavirus (SARS- CoV), followed Dr Tobias Monschein, by the Middle East respiratory syndrome corona- the immune response to SARS- CoV-2 infection. Department of Neurology, virus (MERS- CoV) outbreak in 2012.3 The current Both CD8 and CD4 T cells are activated via their Medical University of Vienna, COVID-19 pandemic, which broke out in Wuhan, respective major histocompatibility complexes I or Vienna, Austria; tobias.
    [Show full text]
  • Strong Immunogenicity of Heterologous Prime-Boost Immunizations with the Experimental Vaccine Grad-COV2 and Bnt162b2 Or Chadox1-Ncov19
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.22.21258961; this version posted June 28, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license . Strong immunogenicity of heterologous prime-boost immunizations with the experimental vaccine GRAd-COV2 and BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1-nCOV19 Chiara Agrati1†*, Stefania Capone2†, Concetta Castilletti1, Eleonora Cimini1, Giulia Matusali1, Silvia Meschi1, Eleonora Tartaglia1, Roberto Camerini2, Simone Lanini1, Stefano Milleri3, Stefano Colloca2, Alessandra Vitelli2, Antonella Folgori2 Affiliations: 1Istituto Nazionale per Le Malattie Infettive Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS; Rome, Italy. 2ReiThera Srl; Rome, Italy. 3Centro Ricerche Cliniche di Verona srl; Verona, Italy. †These authors contributed equally to this work *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Running title: Approved vaccines boost GRAd-COV2-primed immune response Abstract Here we report on the humoral and cellular immune response in eight volunteers who autonomously chose to adhere to the Italian national COVID-19 vaccination campaign more than 3 months after receiving a single administration GRAd-COV2 vaccine candidate in the context of the phase 1 clinical trial. We observed a clear boost of both binding/neutralizing antibodies as well as T cell responses upon receipt of the heterologous BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1-nCOV19 vaccines. These results, despite the limitation of the small sample size, support the concept that a single-dose of an adenoviral vaccine may represent an ideal tool to effectively prime a balanced immune response, which can be boosted to high levels by a single dose of a different vaccine platform.
    [Show full text]
  • The BCG Vaccine for COVID-19: First Verdict and Future Directions
    MINI REVIEW published: 08 March 2021 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.632478 The BCG Vaccine for COVID-19: First Verdict and Future Directions Maria Gonzalez-Perez 1, Rodrigo Sanchez-Tarjuelo 2, Boris Shor 3, Estanislao Nistal-Villan 4,5 and Jordi Ochando 1,2* 1 Transplant Immunology Unit, Department of Immunology, National Center of Microbiology, Instituto De Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain, 2 Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States, 3 Manhattan BioSolutions, New York, NY, United States, 4 Microbiology Section, Departamento de Ciencias Farmacéuticas y de la Salud, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad San Pablo-Centro de Estudios Universitarios (CEU), Madrid, Spain, 5 Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Medicina Molecular Aplicada (IMMA), Universidad San Pablo-CEU, Madrid, Spain Despite of the rapid development of the vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), it will take several months to have enough doses and the proper infrastructure to vaccinate a good proportion of the world population. In this interim, the accessibility to the Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) may mitigate the pandemic impact in some countries and the BCG vaccine offers significant advantages and flexibility in the way clinical vaccines are administered. BCG vaccination is a highly cost-effective intervention against tuberculosis (TB) and many low-and lower-middle-income countries would likely have the infrastructure, Edited by: and health care personnel sufficiently familiar with the conventional TB vaccine to Jose Luis Subiza, mount full-scale efforts to administer novel BCG-based vaccine for COVID-19. This Inmunotek SL, Spain suggests the potential for BCG to overcome future barriers to vaccine roll-out in Reviewed by: the countries where health systems are fragile and where the effects of this new Christine Wong, Charité—Universitätsmedizin coronavirus could be catastrophic.
    [Show full text]