DOCSLIB.ORG

THE ECOLOGICAL NETWORK: a Way to the Nature Conservation in Moldova

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE ECOLOGICAL NETWORK: a Way to the Nature Conservation in Moldova THE ECOLOGICAL NETWORK: A way to the nature conservation in Moldova 51 52 FORWARD The Conference of Environment Ministers from 55 European countries, which took place in Sofia, Bulgaria, on 23-25 October 1995, resulted in the adopting of Pan-European Biological and Landscape Diversity Strategy. Keeping in mind the situation in this field, the major goal of the aforementioned Strategy was to significantly reduce and, as far as it is possible, completely remove the threats, which jeopardise the biological and landscape diversity of Europe. The Strategy also includes an action plan for 1996-2000 which comprises 11 action themes. It is rather significant and symbolic that establishing Pan-European Ecological Network is listed among the priorities. For 2001-2005, it also remains in the focus of conservationists. This emphasis on Pan-European Ecological Network was not a lucky coincidence or a matter of chance, because namely ecological network, as a bridging link between different components of European natural richness, is intended to stimulate the maintenance of ecosystems, habitats, species and landscapes of European importance. With the objectives, set out by the Strategy, in mind, each Party is obliged to develop individual action plâns to meet these objectives. In our country, the issue of establishing a National Ecological Network is paid due attention, and the action plan in relation to its establishing was given priority status as compared to the other action plâns, in line with the Pan-European Strategy. Ecological Society "BIOTICA" should be specially mentioned as a body among a small number of the public, scientific and non-governmental organisations, which successfully deal with the task of developing and promoting the concept of establishing the National Ecological Network in the Republic of Moldova. Over the last 3-4 years, problems related to establishing National Network were tackled for many times at the internaţional conferences on the biodiversity of the Nistru River (1998, 1999, 2000), as well as in the collection of scientific articles, dedicated to the 125th anniversary of academician L.S. Berg (2001). The Concept of establishing the Ecological Network of the Republic of Moldova, published in the collection, results from very important joint work of a team of talented specialists, with financial support of the National Ecological Fund of the Republic of Moldova. The paper presented to the attention of readers, is aimed at popularising the issues related to establishing the National Ecological Network, among the wide public. The present brochure will also be useful to the people who will be directly involved in the work on building the National Ecological Network of the Republic of Moldova, which is 53 sought by the National Strategy and the Action Plan in the field of biological diversity maintenance. I am convinced that the National Ecological Network can be established successfully only if as many as possible of Moldovan residents and decision-makers will be made familiar with its functions and the concept for its establishing. Thus, it can and should be used in environmental education of all levels. At the same, it will play a special role of a visiting cârd of our country in this field, witnessing that in Moldova this problem is paid such a degree of attention which it deserves. Mihail Coca Head of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ministry of Ecology, Building and Territorial Development, the Republic of Moldova 54 INTRODUCTION If you ask former U.S.S.R. citizens what comes to their mind when they hear the word Moldova you will get the following answers. First of all, it is good and inexpensive wine. Secondly, rich sun, boundless fields, gardens and vineyards. A farmer would probably caii this a lovely picture. On the contrary, environmentalists are concerned because a number of reasons. When many lands are used for agriculture, there is not much space left for wildlife. There is no place left for plants and animals. There is no way for soils "to have rest". Children have no opportunity to observe true nature. It is well known that Moldova is among the leading countries in Europe with highest rates of lands used in agriculture. With exception of forests, cheerless pieces of land that men are not able to exploit are left to our wildlife. So, not only humans but plants and animals as well find it hard to leave in our place. As a result, the diversity of species declines. It is noticeably harder to meet sparrows and doves in the cities. Fortunately, we still have what to save. In order to do that, it is necessary to know whom, where and how to save. The talk is not about birds, butterflies, science or beauty of the nature. The most complicated and important thing about the environment is how do eco-systems function in order to ensure life on the Earth with its fields, vineyards and gardens. Let us imagine taking out a component from an engine. The engine is likely to stop working. Let us imagine destroying part of a computer program. The program will work only if it manages to restore itself. And, what will it be, if not? Millions of people do not make attempts to destroy their machines. If a computer is out of order, every boss will caii for a system administrator. The most dangerous tendency is that the degradation of eco-systems due to the disappearance of species and changes in species communities here and there is less noticeable compared to tradiţional environmental pollution with clear consequences. However, such degradation may be even more important and dangerous. The nature is much more complicated than a computer. It continues to repair eco-systems after humans take their components out. Even educated people destroy parts and details saying, "Why are they needed? Should not we destroy it?" The question seems stupid, but that is the real sense put in other words. From time immemorial, hundreds of thousands socialist and capitalist bosses, contemporary feudal lords and democrats, motivated by reason or greed, justice or ambition, in developed states and in poor countries give orders to destroy. How is this going to stop? Have not enough land been diverted to desert? Today, Moldova is a country of poor farmers despite good wine, rich sun and boundless fields. Some hundred years ago, humus, which is the most important component of soil, amounted to 5-6% in soil. In 1990 the figure was in average 3.5%. Political and economic systems changed in the country a number of times, but the speed of losing humus was almost the same all the time. Now, some 40.6% of lands have only 2% of humus. The soil scientists' forecast is that 2.5-3% will be the average by the year 2025, if the speed of losing humus stays the same, though in reality it increases. When will the life here become impossible for four million people? 55 In 1992, the heads of the leading countries from all over the world, being aware that conservation of biodiversity is of outmost importance, signed the Convention on Biodiversity at the Conference on Environment and Development in Rio-de-Janeiro. Since that conference, many have heard of the sustainable development concept. At the first glance, this concept or slogan looks pretty simple. However, many life dimensions are very complicated - economy and politics, energy and clean production, sustainable agriculture, deficiencies in social development, biodiversity. The most complicated task is to realize that everything can be divided into manmade and natural. Manmade things can be restored. Those created by nature during millions of years cannot be traced back, if lost. Environmental scientists are in search of the ways to solve these problems. It is more or less clear what species shall be protected where. It is understandable that territories where wildlife and rare species are better preserved shall be considered as more valuable. Such territories become strict protected areas, reserves and other protected territories. Moldovan environmentalists adhered to this principle, though there was no established system to measure the land's value. It took time to find out that even in developed European countries with many protected territories covering large areas the diversity of animals and plants continues to decline, and many are under the threat of disappearance. That is why, the concept of ecological networks started to get more and more support. The ecological network looks like a simple net with the same design and characteristics. Nets were not invented by man. They were first used by invertebrates - spiders, water larvae of insects (for instance, dragonflies), who build so-called hunting nets. Actually, nets are not the tools of insects only. Some water plants look like small nets. Organisms found the way to use nets for protection. For instance, spider's web does not only feed the spider. It also alarms the spider. When a large-scale animal touches spider's web, its fibbers send a message to the spider that determines the size of intervening object and makes a decision hoe to behave. Humans actively and consistently use nets for protection as well. Nets camouflage military objects. In circus, nets make the work of acrobats safer. Sometimes, nets are used in construction works. They were used at sailing vessels where setting and striking sails required the actions at a height. It looks that net is a universal structure used by both nature and man. Why shall environmentalists not go ahead? Environmentalists decided to create an ecological network, or eco-network, linking together nature reserves. They thought it would be beneficial because this would restore and improve the links between large and small pieces of nature that were in better conditions than others.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regulations to Operate the Water Reservoirs of the HPP and PSPP Dniester Cascade with Buffer Reservoir Normal Headwater Level 77.10 M
    Regulations to Operate the Water Reservoirs of the HPP and PSPP Dniester Cascade with Buffer Reservoir Normal Headwater Level 77.10 m Report and recommendations on the draft updated regulations Pedro Serra July-September 2018 Pedro Cunha Serra INDEX 1. Introduction and ToR................................................................................................................. 5 2. Regional context ........................................................................................................................... 9 3. Geography and hydrology of the region ......................................................................... 10 4. Main features of the HPP and PSPP Dniester Cascade ............................................. 19 5. Proposed Operating Rules ..................................................................................................... 23 5.1 Proposed tasks to be performed by the cascade ........................................................ 23 5.2 Operating curves ........................................................................................................................ 24 5.3 Flood control ................................................................................................................................ 26 5.4 Monitoring and reporting ...................................................................................................... 28 5.5 Environmental requirements .............................................................................................. 29 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Drainage Basin of the Black Sea
    165 CHAPTER 5 DRAINAGE BASIN OF THE BLACK SEA This chapter deals with the assessment of transboundary rivers, lakes and groundwa- ters, as well as selected Ramsar Sites and other wetlands of transboundary importance, which are located in the basin of the Black Sea. Assessed transboundary waters in the drainage basin of the Black Sea Transboundary groundwaters Ramsar Sites/wetlands of Basin/sub-basin(s) Recipient Riparian countries Lakes in the basin within the basin transboundary importance Rezovska/Multudere Black Sea BG, TR Danube Black Sea AT, BA, BG, Reservoirs Silurian-Cretaceous (MD, RO, Lower Danube Green Corridor and HR, CZ, DE, Iron Gate I and UA), Q,N1-2,Pg2-3,Cr2 (RO, UA), Delta Wetlands (BG, MD, RO, UA) HU, MD, ME, Iron Gate II, Dobrudja/Dobrogea Neogene- RO, RS, SI, Lake Neusiedl Sarmatian (BG-RO), Dobrudja/ CH, UA Dobrogea Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous (BG-RO), South Western Backa/Dunav aquifer (RS, HR), Northeast Backa/ Danube -Tisza Interfluve or Backa/Danube-Tisza Interfluve aquifer (RS, HU), Podunajska Basin, Zitny Ostrov/Szigetköz, Hanság-Rábca (HU), Komarnanska Vysoka Kryha/Dunántúli – középhegység északi rész (HU) - Lech Danube AT, DE - Inn Danube AT, DE, IT, CH - Morava Danube AT, CZ, SK Floodplains of the Morava- Dyje-Danube Confluence --Dyje Morava AT, CZ - Raab/Rába Danube AT, HU Rába shallow aquifer, Rába porous cold and thermal aquifer, Rába Kőszeg mountain fractured aquifer, Günser Gebirge Umland, Günstal, Hügelland Raab Ost, Hügelland Raab West, Hügelland Rabnitz, Lafnitztal, Pinkatal 1, Pinkatal 2, Raabtal,
    [Show full text]
  • Shape Analysis of Otoliths of the Round Goby, Neogobius Melanostomus (Gobiiformes, Gobiidae), from the Black Sea Basin
    Zoodiversity, 55(4): 317–330, 2021 Morphology DOI 10.15407/zoo2021.04.317 UDC 597.556.333.1(262.5) SHAPE ANALYSIS OF OTOLITHS OF THE ROUND GOBY, NEOGOBIUS MELANOSTOMUS (GOBIIFORMES, GOBIIDAE), FROM THE BLACK SEA BASIN V. Zamorov1, M. Zamorova1, D. Krupko1,2, N. Matvienko3, Y. Leonchyk1, Y. Kvach1,4* 1Odesa I. I. Mechnikov National University, Dvoryanska st., 2, Odesa, 65002 Ukraine 2Medical Institute of the International Humanitarian University, Fontantskaya doroga st., 33, Odesa, 65009 Ukraine 3Institute of Fisheries of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences, Obukhivska st., 135, Kyiv, 03164 Ukraine 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Pushkinska st., 37, Odesa, 65048 Ukraine *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Y. Kvach (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6122-4150) Shape Analysis of Otoliths of the Round goby, Neogobius melanostomus (Gobiiformes, Gobiidae), from the Black Sea Basin. Zamorov, V., Zamorova, M., Krupko, D., Matvienko, N., Leonchyk, Y., Kvach, Y. — Th e aim of this study was to assess the discriminability of the stocks of the round goby Neogobius melanostomus based on the shape of its otoliths. Recent otolith-shape-based species and stock discrimination studies were using otolith contours in sagittal plane and we are following this approach. We hypothesized the possibility of existence of several geographically separated populations of the round goby. Round gobies have been sampled from diff erent locations of the North-Western Black Sea, otoliths were removed in course of the full biological analysis and photographed in sagittal plane. Principal components of the otolith contour were processed by linear discriminant analysis aiming to cross-validate the discriminability of round gobies placed at diff erent geographical locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Why the Ukrainian Hydropower Infrastructure on Dniester Will Destroy Moldova and How to Prevent Such a Disaster?
    Why the Ukrainian hydropower infrastructure on Dniester will destroy Moldova and how to prevent such a disaster? An “awakening” report on the content and implications of the Ukrainian – Moldavian Agreement on the operation of Dniester Hydropower Complex for the understanding of International Donors, Moldovan Government and population of Dniester River Basin ION EFROS Energy & environment research analyst Institute for Public Policy, Moldova Chisinau 2018 © All rights reserved. The opinions expressed in this report belong solely to the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Institute for Public Policies. Dissemination of this report is encouraged by making reference to the source. Acknowledgements I am grateful for the support offered by Mr Ilya Trombistky during the writing of this report. I am also grateful to a former EU High Level Adviser who peer reviewed it. 3 Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 5 1. Why does Ukraine want an Agreement with Moldova on the operation of the Dniester hydropower complex? ............................................................................................................................................... 6 2. What provisions are under negotiation? .............................................................................................. 8 3. What impact had so far on Lower Dniester river the Dniester hydropower complex? ..................... 11 4. Does
    [Show full text]
  • Dniester Without Borders. Project Results: Transboundary Cooperation
    Organization for Security and Co-operation in Eu rope DNIESTER WITHOUT BORDERS Project results Transboundary cooperation and sustainable management in the Dniester River basin: PHASE III – Implementation of the Action Programme (DNIESTER-III) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Kyiv – 2013 Dniester without Borders. Executive Summary. The report has been prepared by the UNECE/OSCE/UNEP Transboundary Cooperation and Sustainable Management in the Dniester River Basin: Phase III – Implementation of the Action Programme(Dniester-III) project, under the inter­ national Environment and Security initiative (ENVSEC) with the participation of organizations and experts from Mol­ dova and Ukraine. Financial support was provided by the governments of Finland and Sweden. A Centre Collaborating with UNEP SWEDISH ENVIRONMENTAL The project team expresses gratitude for assistance and contribution to its implementation to V. Babchuk, N. Babich, V. Balabukh, V. Bujac, S. Bushuyev, L. Chirica, R. Corobov, T. Guvir, R. Daussa, Ya. Dziuba, , I. Ignatiev, A. Ish­ chuk, L. Kalashnik, A. Kozhushko, N. Krutaya, O. Lysiuk, R. Melian, L. Michenko, V. Mokin, Yu. Nabivanets, M. Pencov, G. Petruk, C. Pickles, T. Siniayeva, L. Serenko, D. Sirecianu, S. Slesarenok, S. Soloninka, G. Syrodoyev, O. Shevchenko, A. Toniyevich, I. Trombitskiy, S. Vinogradov, S. Vykhrist, V. Ursu, V. Yemelin, N. Zakorchevna, M. Zhelezniak and to all the project participants and members of the working groups. Highly valued advisory assistance for the publication was provided by V. Balabukh, S. Koppel, B. Libert, Yu. Nabivanets and D. Sirecianu. Project coordinators: B. Libert (UNECE), T. Kutonova (OSCE), N. Denisov (UNEP). Publication preparation coordinators: T. Kutonova and H. Plotnykova. Authors of the chapters of the full version of the publication: S.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Ecosystem Services in the Lower Dniester Basin
    GEF/UNDP/OSCE Project “Enabling Transboundary Co-operation and Integrated Water Resources Management in the Dniester River Basin” ASSESSMENT OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE LOWER DNIESTER BASIN Nataliia Zakorchevna 2019 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 1. General approach and definitions ......................................................................................................... 4 2. Description of Lower Dniester wetlands ............................................................................................... 7 2.1. Dniester-Turunchuk Crossrivers Area wetland ............................................................................. 8 2.2. Northern part of Dniester Liman wetland ................................................................................... 10 2.3. Lower Dniester wetland .............................................................................................................. 12 3. Identification and assessment of ecosystem services of the Lower Dniester wetlands ..................... 14 3.1. Market prices methodology for assessment of ecosystem services ........................................... 16 3.2. Benefit transfer methodology for assessment of ecosystem services ....................................... 16 3.3. Total value of the ecosystem services in Lower Dniester in Ukraine .......................................... 19 3.4. Assessment of ecosystem services
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Vulnerability to Extreme Floods and Climate Change in the Dniester River Basin” (Dniester III Floods & Climate)
    ENVSEC Project “Reducing vulnerability to extreme floods and climate change in the Dniester river basin” (Dniester III floods & climate) Summary of the baseline studies for Ukraine (prepared by Mr. Nabyvanets) and the Republic of Moldova (prepared by Ms. Serenco) Summary prepared by Ms. Lesya Nikolayeva, Zoi Since the beginning of the century floods have affected the lives of many people. In recent years, the number of frequent catastrophic floods has increased; their economic, social and environmental impacts have worsened leading to the increased casualties. In this very serious situation, the expansion of climate variability and expected climatic changes may result in more frequent and severe flooding. Floods do not respect borders between countries, regions or organizations, so there is need for risk management of transboundary floods, involving governments, since the borders and the population of the respective countries are concerned. However, it is quite difficult to implement risk management, since it requires joint monitoring, forecasting, early warning system, coordinated risk assessment and joint planning. The main advantages of transboundary cooperation are expanded information and knowledge base, increased set of available strategies and ensuring better and cost-effective solutions. In addition, expanding the territory in question during the basin planning allows taking actions in the places where their effect would be much-needed. The Dniester is a river in Eastern Europe, one of the largest rivers of the Carpathians. The Dniester flows from northwest to southeast on the territory of Ukraine, Moldova and Transdniestria. The length of the Dniester is 1352 km with basin area of 72100 km. The river starts in the Carpathian Mountains at an altitude of 900 m above the sea level and flows into the Dniester estuary, which is connected to the Black Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Karadag Nature Reserve of National Academy of Science of Ukraine
    Interpretative Trails on the Ground: Support to the Management of Natural Protected Areas in the Black Sea Region “InterTrails” GUIDELINES ON NATURE INTERPRETATION Odessa-2013 GUIDELINES ON NATURE INTERPRETATION Edited by Oleg Rubel, Anastasiya Snigirova Authors: Natalia Fedoronchuk, Vladimir Poltorak, Galina Bezvushko, Oleh Derkach, Tatyana Balatskaya, Mykola Rozhenko, Julia Nazarchuk This book has been prepared in the frame of the Project “Interpretative Trails on the Ground: Support to the Management of Natural Protected Areas in the Black Sea Region” (InterTrails) funded by European Union. The authors have developed methodological and methodical basis of interpretation of nature protected areas. The structure and detailed description of four ecological trails located in protected areas of the Black Sea coast: Karadag Natural Reserve of NAS of Ukraine, Danube Biosphere Reserve of NAS of Ukraine, Lower Dniester National Nature Park, Regional Landscape Park "Kinburn Sand-spit". The book is designed for tour guides, travel managers and campaigns, staff of protected area, researchers, students and wide range of readers. Reviewers: Alexander Voloshkevich, PhD, director of Danube Biosphere Reserve of National Academy of Science of Ukraine Natalia Gorіap, director of touristic company "Salіx" Michael Zhmud, Ph.D., director of the touristic company "Pelican-Vilkovo-Tour" Ivan Rusev, Ph.D., Ukrainian Anti-Plague Research Institute named after I. I. Mechnikov Vasiliy Fedorenko, PhD, deputy director of the Danube Biosphere Reserve of National
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    International scientific conference “Achievements in studies of marginal effect in water ecosystems and their practical significance” COMMISSION ON THE PROTECTION OF THE BLACK SEA AGAINST POLLUTION NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE OF UKRAINE INSTITUTE OF MARINE BIOLOGY MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF UKRAINE ODESSA NATIONAL I.I. MECHNIKOV UNIVERSITY International scientific conference, Dedicated to 95th Anniversary of Academician of the NAS of Ukraine Yuvenaly Zaitsev «ACHIEVEMENTS IN STUDIES OF MARGINAL EFFECT IN WATER ECOSYSTEMS AND THEIR PRACTICAL SIGNIFICANCE» June 13-14, 2019, Odessa, Ukraine BOOK OF ABSTRACTS International scientific conference “Achievements in studies of marginal effect in water ecosystems and their practical significance” International scientific conference, dedicated to 95th Anniversary of Academician of the NAS of Ukraine Yuvenaly Zaitsev «Achievements in studies of marginal effect in water ecosystems and their practical significance»: Book of abstracts (June 13-14, 2019, Odessa, Ukraine) / Aleksandrov B.G., Snigirova A.A. (eds.) Odessa-Istanbul, 2019 – 71 pp. Scientific Committee: Yuvenaly Zaitsev Institute of marine biology NAS of Ukraine Petro Tsarenko M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany NAS of Ukraine Sergei Olenin Marine Research Institute, Klaipėda University Archil Guchmanidze National Environment Agency of Georgia Vladimir Mamaev UNDP in Europe and Central Asia Oleksandr Protasov Institute of Hydrobiology NAS of Ukraine Galyna Minicheva Institute of marine biology NAS of Ukraine Veniamin Zamorov Odessa
    [Show full text]
  • Transboundary Diagnostic Study for the Dniester River Basin
    Environment, Housing and Land Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Management Division Economic and Environmental United Nations Economic Activities Commission for Europe OSCE/UNECE Project: Transboundary Co-operation and Sustainable Management of the Dniester River TRANSBOUNDARY DIAGNOSTIC STUDY FOR THE DNIESTER RIVER BASIN November 2005 Photo of Valeriu Rusu, NGO "Habitat", Rezina, Moldova Dear readers, The Dniester River is facing severe environmental problems due to pollution and impacts associated with the water flow regime. Environmental degradation of the river is made worse by the Trans-Dniestrian conflict, which, amongst others, hinders the use of joint infrastructure for wastewater treatment. The problem is of a transboundary nature, as the water flows from Ukraine to the Republic of Moldova and then back into Ukraine before being discharged into the Black Sea. Given the importance of the Dniester as a source of drinking water for major cities such as Odessa, the current situation threatens not only the environment but also human health. A Bilateral Agreement between the Government of Ukraine and the Government of the Republic of Moldova on the Joint Use and Protection of Border Waters was signed in 1994, and a Meeting of Plenipotentiaries has been instituted as a cooperation mechanism. Even though this cooperation is working with regard to flood management, the Agreement and its institutional mechanism need to be revised. Important guidelines for future developments include the UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes and (as both Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova aim to become members of the European Union) the EU Water Framework Directive.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Effects of the Dniester Reservoirs on the State of the Dniester River
    GEF project “Enabling Transboundary Cooperation and Integrated Water Resources Management in the Dniester River Basin” UNDP OSCE UNECE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF THE DNIESTER RESERVOIRS ON THE STATE OF THE DNIESTER RIVER Report of the Moldovan-Ukrainian expert group Thematic supplement to the Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis of the Dniester River Basin Vienna Geneva Kyiv Chisinau 2019 The report was prepared as part of the Global Environment Facility (GEF) project “Enabling Transboundary Cooperation and Integrated Water Resources Management in the Dniester River Basin” by members of the Moldovan-Ukrainian expert group on the analysis the effects of the Dniester reservoirs on the Dniester river, composed of: Vasily Greben, Vladimir Gubanov, Oksana Gulyaeva, Gabriel Gilka, Elena Zubkov, Anatoly Kalashnik, Vitaly Kolvenko, Ruslan Melian, Mikhail Penkov, Ilya Trombitsky, Alexander Usov. The GEF project is being implemented by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in cooperation with the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) . Comments and suggestions were provided by German Bejenaru (Austrian Development Agency), Leonid Kalashnyk (OSCE) , Bo Libert (UNECE), participants in the meetings of the bilateral Commission on the Sustainable Use and Protection of the Dniester River Basin held in Chisinau on September 17, 2018 and in Kyiv April 4, 2019 , as well as the participants of the second meeting of the Steering Committee of the GEF project "Enabling Transboundary Cooperation and Integrated Water Resources Management in the Dniester River Basin" held in Odessa 18 December 2018 year. Coordination of the expert group and technical editing of the report: Nickolai Denisov (Zoï Environment Network).
    [Show full text]
  • By Basic Ions)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Electronic Eastern European National University Institutional Repository Materials of the All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference "Rivers and Estuaries of the Black Sea in the Beginning of the 21 Century". October 17-18, 2019, Ukraine, Odesa UDC 482.556 DESCRIPTION OF THE HYDROCHEMICAL REGIME OF THE DNISTER RIVER (BY BASIC IONS) Valentyn Khilchevskyi1, DSc, prof., Myroslava Zabokrytska2, PhD, as. prof., Olesya Honchar3, PhD 1Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv 2Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University, Lutsk 3Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, Chernivtsi Dniester is the second longest river in Ukraine and the ninth in Europe. It flows within the territory of Ukraine and Moldova. The source of the Dniester is in the Ukrainian Carpathians, the river flows into the Dniester estuary, connected to the Black Sea. The length of the river is 1362 km (within Ukraine - 925 km), the basin area – 72 100 km2 (in Ukraine – 52 690 km2). The flow of the Dniester in the average water year is 10.0 km3 (flow rate - 310 m3/s). The Dniester basin is divided into three parts according to the complex of natural channels: the Carpathian (upper), Volyn-Podilsky (middle) and lower southern. The river network in the Dniester basin is developed unevenly. It is the densest in the Carpathian part of the pool, on which about 70% of the flow is formed. The river network is less developed on the left-bank of the Volyn-Podilsky part and is not developed at all in the lower steppe part of the basin.
    [Show full text]