Mykola MERKULOV

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mykola MERKULOV Наука і освіта українського Придунав’я: виміри, виклики, перспективи Flowcs-Williams I. The role of Cluster Facilitators. TCI Preparatory Coarse. Gothenburg, 16.09.2003. Regional Clusters in Europe. Observation of European SMEs. №3. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publication of European Commuities. 2002. Mykola MERKULOV Doctor of Economics, Professor of the Department of Business and Tourism Management Izmail State University of Humanities. Author of 320 scientific papers. He has been working at IDGU since 2015. Research interests: innovation and investment development of industrial enterprises, regional economy, strategy development of the national economy. Е-mail: [email protected] DEVELOPMENT OF CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION IN THE DANUBE REGION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE EUROPEAN INTEGRATION PROCESS It is presented how European integration provides new opportunities for Ukraine and its regions. At the same time, the integration of Ukraine into the European economic space requires the elaboration of its own competitive strategy for each of the cross-border regions, ensuring the formation of appropriate public ideology of their competitiveness. Key words: cross-border cooperation, European integration, the Danube region. The enlargement of the European Union in the context of the transformation of structural priorities and the globalization of the world economy necessitates the search for approaches to adapting cross-border regions to new challenges, especially in terms of increasing their competitiveness. With the change of the vector of economic integration of European states in the foreign policy of Ukraine there have been significant changes that require the development of economic strategy in the regional aspect. As a country bordering the European Union, Ukraine has both prospects and responsibilities for the development of cross-border relations in order to fulfil the tasks, which are set by the EU-Ukraine Partnership and Cooperation Agreement, which allows for the intensification of economic growth in border regions. Under the conditions of global threats, the factors of economic security are not so much the dynamics of production and the availability of natural resources, as the territorial concentration of economic activity, which corresponds to global challenges. The competitiveness of the territory should be understood as its ability to achieve productivity growth and effectively use all types of capital (natural, industrial, financial, human) to enter the global market, becoming a catalyst in the system of commodity, financial and scientific and technological exchanges. Today, the world order is defined around the great poles of power. The European Union, with its growing economic importance, is becoming a pole that requires the development and implementation of a model of relations between peripheral regions of different countries, which would meet the principles of regional policy of the EU, contributed to new forms of cooperation in the «region – region». Exacerbation of global instability at the beginning of the XXI century. calls for the development of new forms of 380 Science and Education of the Ukrainian Danube region: Opportunities, Challenges, Prospects cross-border cooperation alongside Euroregions: cross-border clusters, cross-border industrial zones, cross-border partnerships, cross-border innovation projects, etc. For Ukraine, European integration is still seen as a long-term goal, for the realization of which it is necessary to achieve real success in socio-economic development and the creation of a competitive economy. And for this it is necessary, first of all, to transform the sectoral structural priorities of the economy. With the intensification of globalization, Ukraine, as a participant in the international division of labour, is involved in sectoral structural and technological changes, which take place in the world economy. The ideas of the Washington Consensus, which defined qualitative transformations in the post-Soviet countries, are related to the globalization of the world economy, primarily through the liberalization of foreign economic relations and the strengthening of the processes of openness of economies. The relevance of this research lies in the fact that the cross-border cooperation places an important role in improving the competitiveness of peripheral border regions, reducing spatial differentiation between border and inland subregions, on the one hand, and weak development of theoretical and methodological aspects of cross-border cooperation, on the other hand. In the works of domestic scientists – O. Amosha, P. Bilenky, B. Burkinsky, A. Galchinsky, M. Voynarenko, V. Geets, V. Dergachev, V. Dubnytsky, V. Zakharchenko, V. Kravtsiv, V. Lyashenko, Yu. Makogon, N. Mikula, S. Sokolenko, S. Filippova and others, – the processes of globalization are connected with the information revolution of the 1990s, which was the result of the transition of the economy to a new technological system, the distinguishing feature of which are new structural priorities that form the vector of global structural development in light of qualitative changes, which have occurred and are considered as a kind of signal for the economy of Ukraine in choosing the optimal strategy for economic growth. In a post-industrial society, cross-border production cooperation is an economic tool to increase the competitiveness of Euroregions in terms of scientific and technological progress and the introduction of innovative technologies of a new technological way. It is the competitiveness of cross-border regions that is an important condition for Ukraine’s integration into the global market, and Euroregions intensify their development in the context of globalization. 1. Economic condition of the Ukrainian Danube Region. The Ukrainian Danube Region has a unique economic and geographical position, as the Danube is one of the most important transport arteries in Europe. This means that a large amount of cargo passes through the river, which must then be distributed in the Black Sea ports. It turns out that Dobrogea and Budjak, which are adjacent to both the Danube and the Black Sea, are the key to Europe. Further integration of Ukraine, Romania and Moldova into the European structure requires the development and implementation of such a model of relations between the regions of different countries, which will meet the principles of European Union regional policy, which will contribute to the formation of new forms of cooperation. Euroregion «Lower Danube» with an area of 53 thousand square km and with population of almost 4 million persons is one of the largest and most dynamic Euroregions, in terms of their development. The agreement on the establishment, statute and regulations of «The Lower Danube Euroregion» was signed on August 14, 1998 in Galati (Romania) by the heads of the border regions: Ukraine (Odessa region), Moldova (Vulcanesti, Cahul, Cantemir districts) and Romania (counties: Braila, Galati and Tulcea). The agreement was signed in accordance with the provisions of the Protocol on Tripartite Cooperation between 381 Наука і освіта українського Придунав’я: виміри, виклики, перспективи the Governments of Ukraine, Moldova and Romania, signed in Izmail on July 4, 1997, and the agreements reached during the meeting of the three presidents and the European Framework Convention on Transfrontier Co-operation between communities or authorities, which was adopted in Madrid on 21.05.1980. The participants of the Euroregion include Odessa region (Ukraine), Cahul and Cantemir districts (Moldova), Braila, Galati, Tulcea counties (Romania). Areas of cooperation in accordance with the statute of the Euroregion are: 1) ecology, agriculture and spatial planning (in particular, coordination of programs for environmental protection the basin of the lower Danube, Prut, Siret and Dniester, Danube delta; Danube lakes and floodplains; development of joint programs for conservation of fishery resources of the Danube, Dniester and Prut; development and implementation of joint measures to create new and expand existing natural landscape reserves, solving problems of rational use of resources of the Danube, Dniester, Prut and Black Sea, their environmental protection; coordination of joint efforts to provide the population with quality drinking water; coordination of joint activities to protect the soil and atmosphere, coordinating programs for joint action in the event of fires, floods and other natural disasters); 2) economic relations and labour resources (in particular, development of joint programs on regional economic cooperation for maximum use of regional natural and labour resources of the parties; development of a single information system with databases in environmental, economic and commercial spheres, promotion of joint commercial enterprises and banks with joint capital; promoting the creation of free economic zones (free enterprise zones) with further integration into a single international free economic zone, establishment of relations of cooperation in industrial and agricultural production and processing of agricultural products; transport; in the field of trade in industrial, agricultural and food products; coordination of tariffs in the field of transit transportation of cargo. As the seaports of Odessa region and the Romanian provinces are leaders in the field of maritime transport in the Black Sea region, close cooperation and coordination between them will have a positive impact on the performance of transit
Recommended publications
  • Regulations to Operate the Water Reservoirs of the HPP and PSPP Dniester Cascade with Buffer Reservoir Normal Headwater Level 77.10 M
    Regulations to Operate the Water Reservoirs of the HPP and PSPP Dniester Cascade with Buffer Reservoir Normal Headwater Level 77.10 m Report and recommendations on the draft updated regulations Pedro Serra July-September 2018 Pedro Cunha Serra INDEX 1. Introduction and ToR................................................................................................................. 5 2. Regional context ........................................................................................................................... 9 3. Geography and hydrology of the region ......................................................................... 10 4. Main features of the HPP and PSPP Dniester Cascade ............................................. 19 5. Proposed Operating Rules ..................................................................................................... 23 5.1 Proposed tasks to be performed by the cascade ........................................................ 23 5.2 Operating curves ........................................................................................................................ 24 5.3 Flood control ................................................................................................................................ 26 5.4 Monitoring and reporting ...................................................................................................... 28 5.5 Environmental requirements .............................................................................................. 29 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Drainage Basin of the Black Sea
    165 CHAPTER 5 DRAINAGE BASIN OF THE BLACK SEA This chapter deals with the assessment of transboundary rivers, lakes and groundwa- ters, as well as selected Ramsar Sites and other wetlands of transboundary importance, which are located in the basin of the Black Sea. Assessed transboundary waters in the drainage basin of the Black Sea Transboundary groundwaters Ramsar Sites/wetlands of Basin/sub-basin(s) Recipient Riparian countries Lakes in the basin within the basin transboundary importance Rezovska/Multudere Black Sea BG, TR Danube Black Sea AT, BA, BG, Reservoirs Silurian-Cretaceous (MD, RO, Lower Danube Green Corridor and HR, CZ, DE, Iron Gate I and UA), Q,N1-2,Pg2-3,Cr2 (RO, UA), Delta Wetlands (BG, MD, RO, UA) HU, MD, ME, Iron Gate II, Dobrudja/Dobrogea Neogene- RO, RS, SI, Lake Neusiedl Sarmatian (BG-RO), Dobrudja/ CH, UA Dobrogea Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous (BG-RO), South Western Backa/Dunav aquifer (RS, HR), Northeast Backa/ Danube -Tisza Interfluve or Backa/Danube-Tisza Interfluve aquifer (RS, HU), Podunajska Basin, Zitny Ostrov/Szigetköz, Hanság-Rábca (HU), Komarnanska Vysoka Kryha/Dunántúli – középhegység északi rész (HU) - Lech Danube AT, DE - Inn Danube AT, DE, IT, CH - Morava Danube AT, CZ, SK Floodplains of the Morava- Dyje-Danube Confluence --Dyje Morava AT, CZ - Raab/Rába Danube AT, HU Rába shallow aquifer, Rába porous cold and thermal aquifer, Rába Kőszeg mountain fractured aquifer, Günser Gebirge Umland, Günstal, Hügelland Raab Ost, Hügelland Raab West, Hügelland Rabnitz, Lafnitztal, Pinkatal 1, Pinkatal 2, Raabtal,
    [Show full text]
  • Shape Analysis of Otoliths of the Round Goby, Neogobius Melanostomus (Gobiiformes, Gobiidae), from the Black Sea Basin
    Zoodiversity, 55(4): 317–330, 2021 Morphology DOI 10.15407/zoo2021.04.317 UDC 597.556.333.1(262.5) SHAPE ANALYSIS OF OTOLITHS OF THE ROUND GOBY, NEOGOBIUS MELANOSTOMUS (GOBIIFORMES, GOBIIDAE), FROM THE BLACK SEA BASIN V. Zamorov1, M. Zamorova1, D. Krupko1,2, N. Matvienko3, Y. Leonchyk1, Y. Kvach1,4* 1Odesa I. I. Mechnikov National University, Dvoryanska st., 2, Odesa, 65002 Ukraine 2Medical Institute of the International Humanitarian University, Fontantskaya doroga st., 33, Odesa, 65009 Ukraine 3Institute of Fisheries of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences, Obukhivska st., 135, Kyiv, 03164 Ukraine 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Pushkinska st., 37, Odesa, 65048 Ukraine *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Y. Kvach (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6122-4150) Shape Analysis of Otoliths of the Round goby, Neogobius melanostomus (Gobiiformes, Gobiidae), from the Black Sea Basin. Zamorov, V., Zamorova, M., Krupko, D., Matvienko, N., Leonchyk, Y., Kvach, Y. — Th e aim of this study was to assess the discriminability of the stocks of the round goby Neogobius melanostomus based on the shape of its otoliths. Recent otolith-shape-based species and stock discrimination studies were using otolith contours in sagittal plane and we are following this approach. We hypothesized the possibility of existence of several geographically separated populations of the round goby. Round gobies have been sampled from diff erent locations of the North-Western Black Sea, otoliths were removed in course of the full biological analysis and photographed in sagittal plane. Principal components of the otolith contour were processed by linear discriminant analysis aiming to cross-validate the discriminability of round gobies placed at diff erent geographical locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Why the Ukrainian Hydropower Infrastructure on Dniester Will Destroy Moldova and How to Prevent Such a Disaster?
    Why the Ukrainian hydropower infrastructure on Dniester will destroy Moldova and how to prevent such a disaster? An “awakening” report on the content and implications of the Ukrainian – Moldavian Agreement on the operation of Dniester Hydropower Complex for the understanding of International Donors, Moldovan Government and population of Dniester River Basin ION EFROS Energy & environment research analyst Institute for Public Policy, Moldova Chisinau 2018 © All rights reserved. The opinions expressed in this report belong solely to the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Institute for Public Policies. Dissemination of this report is encouraged by making reference to the source. Acknowledgements I am grateful for the support offered by Mr Ilya Trombistky during the writing of this report. I am also grateful to a former EU High Level Adviser who peer reviewed it. 3 Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 5 1. Why does Ukraine want an Agreement with Moldova on the operation of the Dniester hydropower complex? ............................................................................................................................................... 6 2. What provisions are under negotiation? .............................................................................................. 8 3. What impact had so far on Lower Dniester river the Dniester hydropower complex? ..................... 11 4. Does
    [Show full text]
  • THE ECOLOGICAL NETWORK: a Way to the Nature Conservation in Moldova
    THE ECOLOGICAL NETWORK: A way to the nature conservation in Moldova 51 52 FORWARD The Conference of Environment Ministers from 55 European countries, which took place in Sofia, Bulgaria, on 23-25 October 1995, resulted in the adopting of Pan-European Biological and Landscape Diversity Strategy. Keeping in mind the situation in this field, the major goal of the aforementioned Strategy was to significantly reduce and, as far as it is possible, completely remove the threats, which jeopardise the biological and landscape diversity of Europe. The Strategy also includes an action plan for 1996-2000 which comprises 11 action themes. It is rather significant and symbolic that establishing Pan-European Ecological Network is listed among the priorities. For 2001-2005, it also remains in the focus of conservationists. This emphasis on Pan-European Ecological Network was not a lucky coincidence or a matter of chance, because namely ecological network, as a bridging link between different components of European natural richness, is intended to stimulate the maintenance of ecosystems, habitats, species and landscapes of European importance. With the objectives, set out by the Strategy, in mind, each Party is obliged to develop individual action plâns to meet these objectives. In our country, the issue of establishing a National Ecological Network is paid due attention, and the action plan in relation to its establishing was given priority status as compared to the other action plâns, in line with the Pan-European Strategy. Ecological Society "BIOTICA" should be specially mentioned as a body among a small number of the public, scientific and non-governmental organisations, which successfully deal with the task of developing and promoting the concept of establishing the National Ecological Network in the Republic of Moldova.
    [Show full text]
  • Dniester Without Borders. Project Results: Transboundary Cooperation
    Organization for Security and Co-operation in Eu rope DNIESTER WITHOUT BORDERS Project results Transboundary cooperation and sustainable management in the Dniester River basin: PHASE III – Implementation of the Action Programme (DNIESTER-III) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Kyiv – 2013 Dniester without Borders. Executive Summary. The report has been prepared by the UNECE/OSCE/UNEP Transboundary Cooperation and Sustainable Management in the Dniester River Basin: Phase III – Implementation of the Action Programme(Dniester-III) project, under the inter­ national Environment and Security initiative (ENVSEC) with the participation of organizations and experts from Mol­ dova and Ukraine. Financial support was provided by the governments of Finland and Sweden. A Centre Collaborating with UNEP SWEDISH ENVIRONMENTAL The project team expresses gratitude for assistance and contribution to its implementation to V. Babchuk, N. Babich, V. Balabukh, V. Bujac, S. Bushuyev, L. Chirica, R. Corobov, T. Guvir, R. Daussa, Ya. Dziuba, , I. Ignatiev, A. Ish­ chuk, L. Kalashnik, A. Kozhushko, N. Krutaya, O. Lysiuk, R. Melian, L. Michenko, V. Mokin, Yu. Nabivanets, M. Pencov, G. Petruk, C. Pickles, T. Siniayeva, L. Serenko, D. Sirecianu, S. Slesarenok, S. Soloninka, G. Syrodoyev, O. Shevchenko, A. Toniyevich, I. Trombitskiy, S. Vinogradov, S. Vykhrist, V. Ursu, V. Yemelin, N. Zakorchevna, M. Zhelezniak and to all the project participants and members of the working groups. Highly valued advisory assistance for the publication was provided by V. Balabukh, S. Koppel, B. Libert, Yu. Nabivanets and D. Sirecianu. Project coordinators: B. Libert (UNECE), T. Kutonova (OSCE), N. Denisov (UNEP). Publication preparation coordinators: T. Kutonova and H. Plotnykova. Authors of the chapters of the full version of the publication: S.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Ecosystem Services in the Lower Dniester Basin
    GEF/UNDP/OSCE Project “Enabling Transboundary Co-operation and Integrated Water Resources Management in the Dniester River Basin” ASSESSMENT OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE LOWER DNIESTER BASIN Nataliia Zakorchevna 2019 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 1. General approach and definitions ......................................................................................................... 4 2. Description of Lower Dniester wetlands ............................................................................................... 7 2.1. Dniester-Turunchuk Crossrivers Area wetland ............................................................................. 8 2.2. Northern part of Dniester Liman wetland ................................................................................... 10 2.3. Lower Dniester wetland .............................................................................................................. 12 3. Identification and assessment of ecosystem services of the Lower Dniester wetlands ..................... 14 3.1. Market prices methodology for assessment of ecosystem services ........................................... 16 3.2. Benefit transfer methodology for assessment of ecosystem services ....................................... 16 3.3. Total value of the ecosystem services in Lower Dniester in Ukraine .......................................... 19 3.4. Assessment of ecosystem services
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Vulnerability to Extreme Floods and Climate Change in the Dniester River Basin” (Dniester III Floods & Climate)
    ENVSEC Project “Reducing vulnerability to extreme floods and climate change in the Dniester river basin” (Dniester III floods & climate) Summary of the baseline studies for Ukraine (prepared by Mr. Nabyvanets) and the Republic of Moldova (prepared by Ms. Serenco) Summary prepared by Ms. Lesya Nikolayeva, Zoi Since the beginning of the century floods have affected the lives of many people. In recent years, the number of frequent catastrophic floods has increased; their economic, social and environmental impacts have worsened leading to the increased casualties. In this very serious situation, the expansion of climate variability and expected climatic changes may result in more frequent and severe flooding. Floods do not respect borders between countries, regions or organizations, so there is need for risk management of transboundary floods, involving governments, since the borders and the population of the respective countries are concerned. However, it is quite difficult to implement risk management, since it requires joint monitoring, forecasting, early warning system, coordinated risk assessment and joint planning. The main advantages of transboundary cooperation are expanded information and knowledge base, increased set of available strategies and ensuring better and cost-effective solutions. In addition, expanding the territory in question during the basin planning allows taking actions in the places where their effect would be much-needed. The Dniester is a river in Eastern Europe, one of the largest rivers of the Carpathians. The Dniester flows from northwest to southeast on the territory of Ukraine, Moldova and Transdniestria. The length of the Dniester is 1352 km with basin area of 72100 km. The river starts in the Carpathian Mountains at an altitude of 900 m above the sea level and flows into the Dniester estuary, which is connected to the Black Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Karadag Nature Reserve of National Academy of Science of Ukraine
    Interpretative Trails on the Ground: Support to the Management of Natural Protected Areas in the Black Sea Region “InterTrails” GUIDELINES ON NATURE INTERPRETATION Odessa-2013 GUIDELINES ON NATURE INTERPRETATION Edited by Oleg Rubel, Anastasiya Snigirova Authors: Natalia Fedoronchuk, Vladimir Poltorak, Galina Bezvushko, Oleh Derkach, Tatyana Balatskaya, Mykola Rozhenko, Julia Nazarchuk This book has been prepared in the frame of the Project “Interpretative Trails on the Ground: Support to the Management of Natural Protected Areas in the Black Sea Region” (InterTrails) funded by European Union. The authors have developed methodological and methodical basis of interpretation of nature protected areas. The structure and detailed description of four ecological trails located in protected areas of the Black Sea coast: Karadag Natural Reserve of NAS of Ukraine, Danube Biosphere Reserve of NAS of Ukraine, Lower Dniester National Nature Park, Regional Landscape Park "Kinburn Sand-spit". The book is designed for tour guides, travel managers and campaigns, staff of protected area, researchers, students and wide range of readers. Reviewers: Alexander Voloshkevich, PhD, director of Danube Biosphere Reserve of National Academy of Science of Ukraine Natalia Gorіap, director of touristic company "Salіx" Michael Zhmud, Ph.D., director of the touristic company "Pelican-Vilkovo-Tour" Ivan Rusev, Ph.D., Ukrainian Anti-Plague Research Institute named after I. I. Mechnikov Vasiliy Fedorenko, PhD, deputy director of the Danube Biosphere Reserve of National
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    International scientific conference “Achievements in studies of marginal effect in water ecosystems and their practical significance” COMMISSION ON THE PROTECTION OF THE BLACK SEA AGAINST POLLUTION NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE OF UKRAINE INSTITUTE OF MARINE BIOLOGY MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF UKRAINE ODESSA NATIONAL I.I. MECHNIKOV UNIVERSITY International scientific conference, Dedicated to 95th Anniversary of Academician of the NAS of Ukraine Yuvenaly Zaitsev «ACHIEVEMENTS IN STUDIES OF MARGINAL EFFECT IN WATER ECOSYSTEMS AND THEIR PRACTICAL SIGNIFICANCE» June 13-14, 2019, Odessa, Ukraine BOOK OF ABSTRACTS International scientific conference “Achievements in studies of marginal effect in water ecosystems and their practical significance” International scientific conference, dedicated to 95th Anniversary of Academician of the NAS of Ukraine Yuvenaly Zaitsev «Achievements in studies of marginal effect in water ecosystems and their practical significance»: Book of abstracts (June 13-14, 2019, Odessa, Ukraine) / Aleksandrov B.G., Snigirova A.A. (eds.) Odessa-Istanbul, 2019 – 71 pp. Scientific Committee: Yuvenaly Zaitsev Institute of marine biology NAS of Ukraine Petro Tsarenko M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany NAS of Ukraine Sergei Olenin Marine Research Institute, Klaipėda University Archil Guchmanidze National Environment Agency of Georgia Vladimir Mamaev UNDP in Europe and Central Asia Oleksandr Protasov Institute of Hydrobiology NAS of Ukraine Galyna Minicheva Institute of marine biology NAS of Ukraine Veniamin Zamorov Odessa
    [Show full text]
  • Transboundary Diagnostic Study for the Dniester River Basin
    Environment, Housing and Land Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Management Division Economic and Environmental United Nations Economic Activities Commission for Europe OSCE/UNECE Project: Transboundary Co-operation and Sustainable Management of the Dniester River TRANSBOUNDARY DIAGNOSTIC STUDY FOR THE DNIESTER RIVER BASIN November 2005 Photo of Valeriu Rusu, NGO "Habitat", Rezina, Moldova Dear readers, The Dniester River is facing severe environmental problems due to pollution and impacts associated with the water flow regime. Environmental degradation of the river is made worse by the Trans-Dniestrian conflict, which, amongst others, hinders the use of joint infrastructure for wastewater treatment. The problem is of a transboundary nature, as the water flows from Ukraine to the Republic of Moldova and then back into Ukraine before being discharged into the Black Sea. Given the importance of the Dniester as a source of drinking water for major cities such as Odessa, the current situation threatens not only the environment but also human health. A Bilateral Agreement between the Government of Ukraine and the Government of the Republic of Moldova on the Joint Use and Protection of Border Waters was signed in 1994, and a Meeting of Plenipotentiaries has been instituted as a cooperation mechanism. Even though this cooperation is working with regard to flood management, the Agreement and its institutional mechanism need to be revised. Important guidelines for future developments include the UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes and (as both Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova aim to become members of the European Union) the EU Water Framework Directive.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Effects of the Dniester Reservoirs on the State of the Dniester River
    GEF project “Enabling Transboundary Cooperation and Integrated Water Resources Management in the Dniester River Basin” UNDP OSCE UNECE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF THE DNIESTER RESERVOIRS ON THE STATE OF THE DNIESTER RIVER Report of the Moldovan-Ukrainian expert group Thematic supplement to the Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis of the Dniester River Basin Vienna Geneva Kyiv Chisinau 2019 The report was prepared as part of the Global Environment Facility (GEF) project “Enabling Transboundary Cooperation and Integrated Water Resources Management in the Dniester River Basin” by members of the Moldovan-Ukrainian expert group on the analysis the effects of the Dniester reservoirs on the Dniester river, composed of: Vasily Greben, Vladimir Gubanov, Oksana Gulyaeva, Gabriel Gilka, Elena Zubkov, Anatoly Kalashnik, Vitaly Kolvenko, Ruslan Melian, Mikhail Penkov, Ilya Trombitsky, Alexander Usov. The GEF project is being implemented by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in cooperation with the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) . Comments and suggestions were provided by German Bejenaru (Austrian Development Agency), Leonid Kalashnyk (OSCE) , Bo Libert (UNECE), participants in the meetings of the bilateral Commission on the Sustainable Use and Protection of the Dniester River Basin held in Chisinau on September 17, 2018 and in Kyiv April 4, 2019 , as well as the participants of the second meeting of the Steering Committee of the GEF project "Enabling Transboundary Cooperation and Integrated Water Resources Management in the Dniester River Basin" held in Odessa 18 December 2018 year. Coordination of the expert group and technical editing of the report: Nickolai Denisov (Zoï Environment Network).
    [Show full text]