Arxiv:Cond-Mat/0408683V1 [Cond-Mat.Mtrl-Sci] 31 Aug 2004 Onaisi Ocueteapaec Fanw”Lowered” New a of ¯ at Appearence Loss the Cause to Is Boundaries Mass
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Surface plasmons in metallic structures J. M. Pitarke,1,2, V. M. Silkin,2 E. V. Chulkov,2,3, and P. M. Echenique2,3 1Materia Kondentsatuaren Fisika Saila, Zientzi Fakultatea, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, 644 Posta kutxatila, E-48080 Bilbo, Basque Country, Spain 2Donostia International Physics Center (DIPC) and Centro Mixto CSIC-UPV/EHU, Manuel de Lardizabal Pasealekua, E-20018 Donostia, Basque Country, Spain 3Materialen Fisika Saila, Kimika Fakultatea, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, 1072 Posta kutxatila, E-20080 Donostia, Basque Country, Spain (Dated: September 5, 2018) Since the concept of a surface collective excitation was first introduced by Ritchie, surface plas- mons have played a significant role in a variety of areas of fundamental and applied research, from surface dynamics to surface-plasmon microscopy, surface-plasmon resonance technology, and a wide range of photonic applications. Here we review the basic concepts underlying the existence of surface plasmons in metallic structures, and introduce a new low-energy surface collective excitation that has been recently predicted to exist. PACS numbers: 71.45.Gm, 73.20.At, 78.47.+p, 78.68.+m I. INTRODUCTION the energy loss of charged particles moving outside a metal surface was shown to be due to the excitation 13,14 The long-range nature of the Coulomb interaction be- of surface plasmons, and the centroid of the elec- tween valence electrons in metals is known to yield collec- tron density induced by external potentials acting on a metal surface was demonstrated to be dictated by the tive behaviour, manifesting itself in the form of plasma 15 oscillations. Pines and Bohm1 were the first to suggest wave-vector dependence of surface plasmons. Explicit that the discrete energy losses experienced by fast elec- expressions for the surface-plasmon dispersion relied orig- inally on simple models, such as the hydrodynamic,16 trons in passing through metals are due to the excitation 17 18 of these plasma oscillations, the basic unit of energy being specular-reflection, and infinite-barrier models. Ac- 2 2 1/2 curate numerical calculations have also been performed termed the plasmon: ¯hωp =¯h(4πne /me) , where n is from the knowledge of the eigenfunctions and eigenval- the valence electron density and me is the free electron mass.3 ues of the Kohn-Sham hamiltonian of density-functional theory (DFT),19 showing nice agreement with the experi- Gabor4 investigated the excitation of plasma oscilla- ments that have been carried out on clean, well character- tions in thin foils, but assumed that the electric field is ized surfaces of the alkali metals.20,21 These experiments always zero at the surface. As a result, he did not find also showed evidence for the existence of the so-called surface modes in the bounded plasma and reached the multipole surface plasmons that had been predicted by erroneus conclusion that the probability for plasma loss Benett.22 should decrease strongly with decreasing foil thickness. Ritchie5 was the first to find that the effect of the film 23 The long-wavelength surface-plasmon energy ¯hωs boundaries is to cause the appearence of a new ”lowered” was derived by Ritchie in the nonrelativistic approxima- loss at ¯hωs =¯hωp/√2 due to the excitation of surface col- tion, by assuming that the Coulomb interaction is in- lective oscillations, the quanta of which Stern and Ferrell stantaneous. However, if one is to describe the inter- 6 called the surface plasmon. action of either relativistic electrons or light with solid Ritchie’s prediction of surface polarization causing low- surfaces, it is necessary to take into account the time energy losses in metals was confirmed in a series of exper- needed for the propagation of the true retarded interac- iments carried out by Powell and Swan7, who observed tion. As a result of retardation, surface plasmons couple inelastic losses experienced by electrons scattered from at wavelengths larger than 2πc/ωs with the free elec- newly evaporated layers of Al and Mg. Since then, there tromagnetic field and yield what∼ is now called a surface- has been a significant advance in both theoretical and plasmon polariton.24 At these large wavelengths, the experimental investigations of collective modes in the arXiv:cond-mat/0408683v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 31 Aug 2004 surface-plasmon polariton exists over the entire frequency vacuum-solid interface. range from zero to an asymptotic value determined by the The concept of the surface plasmon has played a key surface-plasmon frequency ωs. However, the correspond- role in the understanding of fundamental properties of ing dispersion curve never crosses the dispersion curve solids and in the interpretation of a large variety of ex- of free-space electromagnetic radiation. Hence, there is periments. For example, the classical image potential always a momentum mismatch between light and surface acting between a point classical charge and a metal sur- plasmons of the same frequency, so that light incident on face was shown to be originated in the shifted zero point an ideal surface cannot excite surface plasmons and, con- energy of the surface plasmon field,8,9,10,11 the impact of versely, the surface plasmon cannot decay by emitting a the surfce plasmon on surface energies was addressed,12 photon. 2 Teng and Stern25 were the first to point out that any surface-plasmon excitation plays in the interaction of fast surface roughness permits the surface to impart some charged particles with solid surfaces, since it is precisely additional momentum to the surface-plasma oscillation, the investigation of electron energy loss in thin foils which so that it can couple to electromagnetic radiation. Al- brought Ritchie to the realization that surface collective 5 ternatively, prism coupling can be used to enhance the excitations exist at the lowered frequency ωs. The detec- momentum of incident light, as demonstrated by Otto26 tion of surface plasmons and their dispersion is discussed and by Kretchmann and Raether.27 Hence, surface plas- in Section III, in the framework of angle-resolved inelastic mons have been employed in a wide spectrum of stud- electron scattering experiments. Localized surface plas- ies from electrochemistry, catalysis, wetting, thin or- mons and the use of sum rules that provide insight of ganic condensates, and biosensing,28 to scanning tunnel- surface-plasmon energies in metallic structures of arbi- ing microscopy,29 the ejection of ions from surfaces,30 trary geometry are introduced in Section IV. Section V surface dynamics,31 surface-plasmon microscopy,32 and is devoted to the retarded region, where surface plasmons surface-plasmon resonance technology.33 Moreover, re- couple with the free electromagnetic field. Acoustic sur- cent advances that allow metals to be structured and face plasmons are introduced in Section VI. characterized on the nanometer scale have rekindled Unless stated otherwise, atomic units are used 2 the long-standing interest in surface plasmons, one of throughout, i.e., e =¯h = me = 1. the most attractive aspects of these collective excita- tions now being their use to concentrate light in sub- wavelength structures34 and to enhance transmission II. PLASMA LOSSES BY FAST CHARGED through periodic arrays of subwavelengths holes in op- PARTICLES IN SOLIDS tically thick metallic films,35,36 as well as the possible fabrication of nanoscale photonic circuits operating at Let us consider a recoiless fast point particle of charge 37 optical frequencies. Z1 moving in an arbitrary inhomogeneous many-electron Since the typical energy of bulk and surface plasmons system with nonrelativistic velocity v, for which retar- is of a few electronvolts, thermal excitation of these dation effects and radiation losses can be neglected.47 collective oscillations is improbable, so that the elec- The charge density of the probe particle is simply a delta tronic properties near the Fermi level cannot be directly function of the form influenced by these excitations. Much more effective ρext(r,t)= Z δ(r r v t), (1) than ordinary bulk and surface plasmons in mediating, 1 − 0 − e.g., superconductivity would be the so-called acoustic 38 and the energy that this classical particle loses per unit plasmons with sound-like long-wavelength dispersion, time due to electronic excitations in the medium can be which have spurred over the years a remarkable inter- written as48 est and research activity.39 Acoustic plasma oscillations were observed in two-dimensionally confined and spa- dE ∂V ind(r,t) = dr ρext(r,t) , (2) tially separated multicomponent structures such as quan- − dt − ∂t tum wells and heterojunctions,40,41 and were then pro- Z ind posed as possible candidates to mediate the attractive where V (r,t) is the potential induced by the probe interaction leading to the formation of Cooper pairs in particle at position r and time t. 42,43 high-Tc superconductors. To first order in the external perturbation, time- Recently, it has been shown that metal surfaces where dependent perturbation theory yields a partially occupied quasi two-dimensional (2D) surface- +∞ +∞ dω ′ state band coexists in the same region of space with the V ind(r,t) = dr′ dt′ e−iω(t−t ) 2π underlying three-dimensional (3D) continuum support a Z Z−∞ Z−∞ well-defined acoustic surface plasmon.44 This new low- energy collective excitation exhibits linear dispersion at W˜ (r, r′; ω) ρext(r′,t′), (3) low wave vectors, and might therefore affect electron-hole × (e-h) and phonon dynamics near the Fermi level.45 It has where been demonstrated that it is a combination of the nonlo- W˜ (r, r′; ω)= W (r, r′; ω) v(r, r′), (4) cality of the 3D dynamical screening and the spill out of − the 3D electron density into the vacuum which allows the v(r, r′) being the bare Coulomb interaction and formation of 2D electron-density acoustic oscillations at W (r, r′; ω) being the so-called screened interaction, metal surfaces, since these oscillations would otherwise be which is usually expresed in terms of the density-response 46 completely screened by the surrounding 3D substrate.