DOCSLIB.ORG

1-10 Prevalence of Bovine Mastitis, Risk Factors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1-10 Prevalence of Bovine Mastitis, Risk Factors East African Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (2018) Volume 2 (1): 1-10 Prevalence of Bovine Mastitis, Risk Factors and major Causative Agents in West Hararghe Zone, East Ethiopia Ketema Boggale, Bekele Birru*, Kifle Nigusu, and Shimalis Asras Hirna Regional Veterinary Laboratory, P.O. Box 36, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia Abstract: A cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2009 to March 2010 in Boke, Darolebu, Kuni, Mieso and Tulo districts to estimate the prevalence of bovine mastitis, identify associated risk factors and isolate the predominant bacterial agents. A total of 1019 lactating cows were examined clinically and using California Mastitis Test (CMT) for subclinical mastitis. Standard bacteriological techniques were employed to isolate the bacterial agents. A total of 393 (38.6%) cows were positive for both clinical and subclinical mastitis. Among the risk factors, age, parity, and lactation stages were not significantly (p>0.05) associated with prevalence of mastitis. However, hygienic status of animals was associated with the occurrence of mastitis (p<0.05). Both contagious and environmental bacteria were isolated from milk samples collected from mastitic cows. The predominant bacteria isolate was Staphylococcus aureus with proportion of 14.1% followed by S. agalactiae with isolation proportion of 13.2%. E. coli and S. intermedius were the third predominant isolates with a rate of 10.9% for each. Among the seven antibiotics tested, gentamycin, amoxicillin, oxytetracycline, ampicillin, and cloxacillin were effective, whereas streptomycin and penicillin showed poor efficacy. The study revealed that mastitis is significant problem of dairy cows in the study areas. Hence, awareness creation among dairy farmers should be made about the impact of the disease; and training on hygienic milking practice and treating of subclinically infected cows should be given. Keywords: California mastitis test, Clinical mastitis, Risk factors, Subclinical mastitis Introduction (Mungube et al., 2004). Mastitis as a disease, especially Ethiopia has the largest livestock population compared the subclinical form, has received little attention in the to other African countries and cows represent the country and efforts have only been concentrated on the largest population of cattle of the country (CSA, 2009). treatment of clinical cases (Girma, 2001). The Milk produced from these animals provides an pathogens responsible for causing mastitis are broadly important dietary source for the majority of rural as classified into contagious and environmental agents well as considerable number of the urban and peri- (Quinn et al., 2002). The common microorganisms urban population. However, milk production often responsible for mastitis and spoilage of milk includes does not satisfy the country’s population requirement. Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, Corynebacterium According to the reports of FAO (2015a & b), the total bovis, Mycoplasma species, and Streptococcus uberis (Erskine, annual national raw milk production in Ethiopia ranges 2001), coliforms (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species and from 797,900 to 1,197,500 metric tons equivalents of Enterobacter aerogenes), Serratia, Pseudomonas, Proteus which 85 to 89 % is contributed by cattle. However, species, environmental Streptococci, and Enterobacter this amount is by far below the national demand for species (Quinn et al., 2002). milk and milk products, showing the considerable In Ethiopia, the available information indicates that potential for increasing small holder income and bovine mastitis is one of the most frequently employment opportunities across the dairy production encountered and prevalent diseases of dairy cows value chain. causing economic loss as a result of reduced milk yield, Mastitis is among important health problems in dairy discarded milk, and early culling of productive cows cattle and considered as one of the most important (Fekadu, 1995; Mekonnen et al., 2005). The reported threats affecting the dairy industry throughout the prevalence of mastitis in different parts of Ethiopia country (Biffa et al., 2005). Mastitis is an inflammation ranges from 1.2% to 21.5% (Kassa et al., 1999; Lemma of the mammary gland and udder tissue that usually et al., 2001; Mungube, 2001; Workineh et al., 2002; occurs as an immune response to bacterial invasion of Kerro and Tareke, 2003). the teat canal by variety of bacterial sources present on Across the globe, various reports indicated that S. the farm, and can also occur as a result of chemical, aureus showed resistance to penicillin. Previous study in mechanical and thermal injury to the udder (Wellenberg Italy (Gentilini et al., 2000), Argentina (Gianneechini et et al., 2002; Radostits et al., 2007). It is mostly a result of al., 2002), and Uruguay (Pitkala et al., 2004) reported a combined interplay among exposure to microbes, cow resistance rate of 47%, 40%, and 47%, respectively. In defence mechanisms and environmental risk factors Ethiopia, S. aureus isolates were highly resistant to (Suriyasathaporn et al., 2000). Mastitis is a management clindamycin (73.8%), bacitracin (72.1%) and related disease whose prevention and control depends vancomycin (70.5%) (Shimelis, 2014). The high among other factors on good management practices incidence of resistant bacteria might be due to ___________________________________________ *Corresponding Author. E-mail: [email protected] ©Haramaya University, 2018 ISSN 2616-8804 (Print) Ketema et al. East African Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 2 (1): 1-10 indiscriminate use of antibiotics and intra-mammary years), adults (> 6 to 10 years), and old (> 10 years). preparations containing combinations or single broad- Parity was categorized as few (1- 3 calves), moderate (4- spectrum antibiotics (Pitkala et al., 2007). Edward et al. 7 calves), and many (> 7calves) (Berhanu et al., 2010). (2002) suggested a possible development of resistance Stage of lactation was categorized as early (1 up to 4 from prolonged and indiscriminate usage of some months), mid (4 up to 8 month), and late (8 month up antimicrobials. to the beginning of dry period) and hygiene of udder In west Hararghe Zone, famers reported mastitis as was categorized as Washing/drying, Washing only and one of the health problems among dairy cattle. not at all (Berhanu et al., 2010). In the study area, dairy However, to the best of our knowledge, a systematic cattle are managed under semi- intensive management study was not conducted to provide detailed system and provided natural pasture and agricultural by information on cattle mastitis. Thus, the study was product. conducted to estimate the prevalence of bovine mastitis, assess risk factors, isolate and identify the Study Design bacterial causative agents, and determine the drug A cross-sectional study was conducted from October resistance patters of the isolated bacteria in the study 2009 to March 2010 at cow and quarter level based on area. clinical and subclinical mastitis and indirect test (California mastitis test and culture) for subclinical Materials and Methods mastitis, microbial isolation and in-vitro antimicrobial Study Areas susceptibility test. The study was conducted in west Hararghe (latitude: 7°50’–9°50’ N; longitude: 40°00’–41°25’ E; altitude: Sampling and Sample Size Determination 1200–3060 m) administrative zones which are located For estimation of the prevalence of mastitis in the in the eastern part of Oromia Regional State and share study area, the sample size was determined by assuming boundaries with Afar Regional State, Somali Regional the expected prevalence to be 50% with the 95% State, as well as the east Hararghe Zone. The livestock confidence level and desired precision of 5% using the population of west Hararghe is 1,149,089 cattle, formula described by Thrusfield (2005). Accordingly, 510,164 sheep and goats (WHZBA, 2006). It has three the minimum sample size required from each of the distinct agro-ecologies and different farming system five districts was 384 but only a total of 1019 cows that consists of highland (17.5%), mid highland were taken since the study was conducted in dry season (28.5%), and lowland (54.0%) and have two rainy in May and June and some of the areas were not seasons, the short rainy season and the main rainy accessible due to lack of transportation. The rural season, with a mean annual rainfall ranging from below kebeles, villages and lactating cows were also selected 700 mm in the lowlands to nearly 1200 mm at higher based on their accessibility to transportation. altitudes. Most of the people living in Hararghe lowlands are nomadic agro-pastoralists who move their Study Methodology livestock seasonally, following grazing opportunities Milk sampling procedure: History of the selected and water availability (Guinand, 2000). milking cow was taken to record information such as number of parturitions, parity, treatment, and physical Study Animals examination of the udder to determine blind teats and The study was conducted in districts that have major other defects and inflammation. The milk samples were towns with significant milk flow in the operational area taken from cows that are not treated with either intra- of Hirna Regional Veterinary Laboratory. Lactating mammary or systematic antimicrobials agents. The cows of local breed 15 days after parturition were udder was cleaned with warm water, antiseptics and selected for the study. The lactating cows were selected dried with clean towel.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: 2015 HRF Projects Map (As of 31 December 2015)
    Ethiopia: 2015 HRF projects map (as of 31 December 2015) Countrywide intervention ERITREA Legend UNICEF - Nutrition - $999,753 Concern☃ - VSF-G ☈ ! Refugee camp WFP - Nutrition (CSB) - $1.5m National capital Shimelba Red Sea SUDAN Regional intervention International boundary Hitsa!ts Dalul UNICEF - Health - $1.0m ! !Hitsats ! ! Undetermined boundary ! ! SCI Tigray, Afar, Amhara, Oromia, Kelete Berahile ☃☉ May-Ayni Kola ! Somali, Gambella, SNPR & NRC - ☉ Ts!elemti Temben Awelallo Lake IRC - ★ ! ☄ ! ♫ Tanqua ! SUDAN ! ! ! Dire Dawa Adi Harush ! Enderta Abergele ! Ab Ala Afdera Project woredas Tselemt ! NRC - Debark GAA - ☇ ! WFP (UNHAS) - Coordination ☈ Abergele! Erebti ☋☉ Plan Int. - ACF - ☃ Dabat Sahla ☃Megale Bidu and Support Service - $740,703 Janamora Wegera! Clusters/Activities ! Ziquala Somali region Sekota ! ! Concern - SCI Teru ! Agriculture CRS - Agriculture/Seed - $2,5m ☃ ☃ Kurri ! Dehana ! ☋ ! Gaz Alamata ! Elidar GAA - ☋ Amhara,Ormia and SNNP regions ! ☃☉ Gonder Zuria Gibla ! Gulf of ! Education Plan Int. - Ebenat Kobo SCI☃☉ ☃ ! Gidan ☄ Lasta ! Aden CARE - Lay Guba ! Ewa ! ☃ ! Meket Lafto Gayint ! Food security & livelihood WV - ☃ Dubti ☈ ☉ ! Tach Habru Chifra SCI - ☃ Delanta ! ! - Tigray Region, Eastern Zone, Kelete Awelall, ! Gayint IMC - ☃ Health ☉ Simada Southern Zone, Alamata and Enderta woredas ! ! Mile DJIBOUTI ☊ Mekdela ! Bati Enbise SCI- Nutrition ! Argoba ☃☉ WV - ☃ Sar Midir Legambo ☃ ! Oxfam GB - Enarj ! ☉ ! ! Ayisha Non Food Items - Amhara region, North Gonder (Gonder Zuria), Enawga ! Antsokiya Dalfagi ! ! ! Concern
    [Show full text]
  • 14 3W Edu 080217 A4.Pdf (English)
    Ethiopia: 3W - Education Cluster Ongoing Activities map (August 2017) ERITREA 5 Total Number of Partners MoE ☄ UNICEF WFP Saesie Tsaedaemba MoE MoE Dalul Red Sea WFP Kelete WFP Awelallo MoE MoE UNICEF Tselemti TIGRAY Berahile MoE UNICEF Afdera Tanqua MoE UNICEF Abergele WFP MoE UNICEF Erebti MoE WFP MoE UNICEF WFP MoE Janamora UNICEF Gulf of UNICEF WFP MoE MoE MoE Bidu Aden Sahla Teru MoE UNICEF WFP UNICEF Kurri UNICEF East MoE WFP SUDAN Sekota UNICEF Belesa UNICEF MoE West UNICEF Raya Yalo WFP Belesa MoE Dehana MoE Azebo MoE WFP UNICEF WFP Awra MoE UNICEF Gaz UNICEF MoE MoE MoE Gibla WFP Elidar Ebenat Kobo MoE AFAR MoE AMHARA MoE Meket Ewa Chifra WFP UNICEF Aysaita Simada UNICEF Dawunt WFP UNICEF UNICEF UNICEF MoE WFP UNICEF MoE DJIBOUTI UNICEF Bati WFP WFP Sayint MoE Telalak MoE MoE Argoba MoE UNICEF WFP Enbise UNICEF Ayisha Shinile BoE Sar Midir WFP UNICEF BENISHANGUL MoE WFP Gewane BoE Erer GUMU WFP Bure MoE Mudaytu UNICEF Afdem WFP UNICEF WFP BoE WFP WFP Simurobi BoE BoE Gele'alo UNICEF WFP Dembel Aw-bare UNICEF BoE Dulecha WFP DIRE Chinaksen Argoba Amibara BoE MoE Special Miesso DAWA UNICEF WFP UNICEF WFP WFP WFP MoE WFP Hareshen MoE HARERI BoE BoE MoE WFP WFP WFP Babile BoE MoE MoE MoE BoE Kebribeyah BoE SOMALIA SOUTH SUDAN Malka UNICEF WFP Anchar Balo MoE MoE BoE Aware UNICEF Midega Boke Golo Oda Oxfam Tola WFP Oxfam UNICEF WFP UNICEF WFP MoE MoE Meyumuluka MoE WFP Fik MoE UNICEF WFP BoE Hawi Degehamedo BoE WFP WFP WFP Gudina Lege WFP SOMALI Lagahida BoE Gashamo WFP WFP Hida BoE Degehabur MoE MoE MoE BoE Danot MoE Meyu Hamero
    [Show full text]
  • Oromia Region Administrative Map(As of 27 March 2013)
    ETHIOPIA: Oromia Region Administrative Map (as of 27 March 2013) Amhara Gundo Meskel ! Amuru Dera Kelo ! Agemsa BENISHANGUL ! Jangir Ibantu ! ! Filikilik Hidabu GUMUZ Kiremu ! ! Wara AMHARA Haro ! Obera Jarte Gosha Dire ! ! Abote ! Tsiyon Jars!o ! Ejere Limu Ayana ! Kiremu Alibo ! Jardega Hose Tulu Miki Haro ! ! Kokofe Ababo Mana Mendi ! Gebre ! Gida ! Guracha ! ! Degem AFAR ! Gelila SomHbo oro Abay ! ! Sibu Kiltu Kewo Kere ! Biriti Degem DIRE DAWA Ayana ! ! Fiche Benguwa Chomen Dobi Abuna Ali ! K! ara ! Kuyu Debre Tsige ! Toba Guduru Dedu ! Doro ! ! Achane G/Be!ret Minare Debre ! Mendida Shambu Daleti ! Libanos Weberi Abe Chulute! Jemo ! Abichuna Kombolcha West Limu Hor!o ! Meta Yaya Gota Dongoro Kombolcha Ginde Kachisi Lefo ! Muke Turi Melka Chinaksen ! Gne'a ! N!ejo Fincha!-a Kembolcha R!obi ! Adda Gulele Rafu Jarso ! ! ! Wuchale ! Nopa ! Beret Mekoda Muger ! ! Wellega Nejo ! Goro Kulubi ! ! Funyan Debeka Boji Shikute Berga Jida ! Kombolcha Kober Guto Guduru ! !Duber Water Kersa Haro Jarso ! ! Debra ! ! Bira Gudetu ! Bila Seyo Chobi Kembibit Gutu Che!lenko ! ! Welenkombi Gorfo ! ! Begi Jarso Dirmeji Gida Bila Jimma ! Ketket Mulo ! Kersa Maya Bila Gola ! ! ! Sheno ! Kobo Alem Kondole ! ! Bicho ! Deder Gursum Muklemi Hena Sibu ! Chancho Wenoda ! Mieso Doba Kurfa Maya Beg!i Deboko ! Rare Mida ! Goja Shino Inchini Sululta Aleltu Babile Jimma Mulo ! Meta Guliso Golo Sire Hunde! Deder Chele ! Tobi Lalo ! Mekenejo Bitile ! Kegn Aleltu ! Tulo ! Harawacha ! ! ! ! Rob G! obu Genete ! Ifata Jeldu Lafto Girawa ! Gawo Inango ! Sendafa Mieso Hirna
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010
    ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010 R Legend Eritrea E Tigray R egion !ª D 450 ho uses burned do wn d ue to th e re ce nt International Boundary !ª !ª Ahferom Sudan Tahtay Erob fire incid ent in Keft a hum era woreda. I nhabitan ts Laelay Ahferom !ª Regional Boundary > Mereb Leke " !ª S are repo rted to be lef t out o f sh elter; UNI CEF !ª Adiyabo Adiyabo Gulomekeda W W W 7 Dalul E !Ò Laelay togethe r w ith the regiona l g ove rnm ent is Zonal Boundary North Western A Kafta Humera Maychew Eastern !ª sup portin g the victim s with provision o f wate r Measle Cas es Woreda Boundary Central and oth er imm ediate n eeds Measles co ntinues to b e re ported > Western Berahle with new four cases in Arada Zone 2 Lakes WBN BN Tsel emt !A !ª A! Sub-city,Ad dis Ababa ; and one Addi Arekay> W b Afa r Region N b Afdera Military Operation BeyedaB Ab Ala ! case in Ahfe rom woreda, Tig ray > > bb The re a re d isplaced pe ople from fo ur A Debark > > b o N W b B N Abergele Erebtoi B N W Southern keb eles of Mille and also five kebeles B N Janam ora Moegale Bidu Dabat Wag HiomraW B of Da llol woreda s (400 0 persons) a ff ected Hot Spot Areas AWD C ases N N N > N > B B W Sahl a B W > B N W Raya A zebo due to flo oding from Awash rive r an d ru n Since t he beg in nin g of th e year, Wegera B N No Data/No Humanitarian Concern > Ziquala Sekota B a total of 967 cases of AWD w ith East bb BN > Teru > off fro m Tigray highlands, respective ly.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Map Assessment
    Risk Map Assessment A Socio-Economic Study on Vulnerable Children and Adolescents In West Hararge Zone Chiro and Gemechis Woredas Comitato Internazionale per lo Sviluppo dei Popoli (CISP) (International Committee for the Development of Peoples) In the framework of the Italian Cooperation Programme in support of vulnerable children and adolescents in Ethiopia Research Team Desta Ayode Azmeraw Belay Mekdes G/Tinsaye Addis Ababa, June 2006 Risk Map Assessment Table of content Page Acknowledgement ----------------------------------------------------------- i List of Acronyms ------------------------------------------------------------ ii List of Tables and Charts --------------------------------------------------- iii Executive Summary --------------------------------------------------------- 1 Part One; Background ---------------------------------------------- 4 1.1 Introduction------------------------------------------------------------------ 4 1.2 Policy and Legal Framework----------------------------------------------- 5 1.3 Background of the Study--------------------------------------------------- 6 1.4 Objectives of the Study---------------------------------------------- ------ 6 1.5 Overview of the Study Area----------------------------------------- ------ 7 1.6 Structure of the Report----------------------------------------------------- 8 Part Two: Methodology------------------------------------------- 9 2.1 Instruments-------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 2.2 Selection of the Study Sites-------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Somali Region
    Food Supply Prospects FOR THE SECOND HALF OF YEAR 2013 ______________________________________________________________________________ Disaster Risk Management and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS) Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) September, 2013 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF LOCAL NAMES .................................................................. 1 ACRONYMS ............................................................................................. 2 EXCUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 7 REGIONAL SUMMARY OF FOOD SUPPLY PROSPECT ............................. 11 SOMALI .............................................................................................. 11 OROMIA ............................................................................................. 16 TIGRAY ............................................................................................... 22 AMHARA ............................................................................................ 25 AFAR .................................................................................................. 28 SNNP .................................................................................................. 32 Annex – 1: NEEDY POPULATION AND FOOD REQUIREMENT BY WOREDA (Second half of 2013) ............................................................................ 35 0 | P a g e GLOSSARY
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Improved Napier Cultivars As Livestock Feed Under Farmers Conditions in West Hararghe Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia
    Animal and Veterinary Sciences 2021; 9(1): 5-15 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/avs doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20210901.12 ISSN: 2328-5842 (Print); ISSN: 2328-5850 (Online) Evaluation of Improved Napier Cultivars as Livestock Feed Under Farmers Conditions in West Hararghe Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia Tamrat Dinkale1, *, Tessema Zewdu2, Meseret Girma2 1Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Mechara Agricultural Research Center, Mechara, Ethiopia 2Department of Animal Sciences and Range, Haramaya University, Dire Dewa, Ethiopia Email address: *Corresponding author To cite this article: Tamrat Dinkale, Tessema Zewdu, Meseret Girma. Evaluation of Improved Napier Cultivars as Livestock Feed Under Farmers Conditions in West Hararghe Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Animal and Veterinary Sciences. Vol. 9, No. 1, 2021, pp. 5-15. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20210901.12 Received: November 6, 2020; Accepted: December 16, 2020; Published: January 30, 2021 Abstract: This study was conducted to evaluate the forage production and farmers preference as livestock feed under farmer’s conditions in West Hararghe Zone of Oromia region, Ethiopia. Four improved Napier grass cultivars (ILRI cultivar number: 16801, 16800, 16798, and 16840) and local check were planted in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with six replications during the main cropping season of 2018/19. The dry matter (DM) yield, fresh biomass yield, plant height, leaf length and leaf-stem ratio and other agronomic data were measured at harvest. Farmers preference of the Napier grass cultivars as livestock feed was collected through visual and hand evaluation of the multiple ranking criteria of the cultivars based on phonological nature. The results shows that, ILRI cultivar no.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Role of Agricultural Cooperatives in Input Output Market in Boke, Anchar and Darolebu Districts of West Hararghe Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia
    Journal of Natural Sciences Research www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-3186 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0921 (Online) Vol.10, No.11, 2020 Assessment of the Role of Agricultural Cooperatives in Input Output Market in Boke, Anchar and Darolebu Districts of West Hararghe Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia *Birhanu Angasu Tadesse Melka Gosa Alemu Jima Degaga Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Mechara Agricultural Research Center, P.O.BOX 19, Mechara, Ethiopia Abstract The study was conducted in three districts where agricultural cooperatives have been well promoted in West Hararghe zone to identify role of primary agricultural Cooperatives and factors affecting its role in the study area. Structured interview schedule were used to collect data from 180 cooperative members and non-members selected randomly from six agricultural cooperatives and its surrounding. Focus group discussions were also conducted to collect qualitative data from respondents. In this study, the statistical tools like descriptive statistics such as mean, frequency distribution and percentage, SWOT analysis and an index score was used to rank major constraints. Out of interviewed respondents, 66.7% were member of cooperative while 33.3% were non-members of the cooperatives. Most primary cooperative mainly focuses on the activities like provision of fertilizer (DAP, UREA and NPS), consumable food items (sugar and cooking oil) and rarely involved in improved seed distributions. Lack market interest, climate change, lack of market information, insufficient capital and low price of the marketable commodity were major constraints found in agricultural commodities in study area. Strengthening training, improve their capital, services and transparency, increasing members participation, sharing dividend to the members and annual auditing their status were major recommendation delivered for responsible bodies by the study.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA Food Security Update June 2009
    ETHIOPIA Food Security Update June 2009 Ethiopia continues to face high levels of food Figure 1. Current food security conditions, June 2009 insecurity. A total of 7.5 million chronically food insecure people receive assistance through employment in public works under the Productive Safety‐Net Program (PSNP). An additional 4.9 million people require emergency food assistance through June 2009. In addition, about 200,000 people have been displaced in the southern parts of the country due to clan conflict and are receiving humanitarian assistance. However, the official size of the food insecure population will most likely increase following poor performance of the belg/gu season this year. Actual figures will be provided by the ongoing belg/gu assessment missions. Based on current needs, and not including possible increases due to the poor belg/gu season, there is Source: FEWS NET and WFP Ethiopia insufficient relief food in the country due to a For more information on FEWS NET’s Food Insecurity Severity Scale, please combination of resource shortfalls and a shortage of see: www.fews.net/FoodInsecurityScale trucks to transport food from the Djibouti port. Cereal prices have remained relatively stable since the beginning of 2009 and showed a slight decline in May contrary to the seasonal pattern. For example, the nominal retail price of white maize, the cereal most widely consumed by the poor was six percent lower than that of last month and 14 percent less than May 2008. Compared to the 2004‐2008 average however, it is 72 percent higher. These high prices will continue to constrain food access for households that spend a significant proportion of their income on food.
    [Show full text]
  • Anticipated Humanitarian Requirement for Water, Sanitation
    1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS/GLOSSARY ......................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 2 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 3 1.1. 2014 ANNUAL HUMANITARIAN REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT ........................................................................... 3 1.2. HUMANITARIAN SITUATION OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................... 3 2. REVIEW OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE 2013 HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE ................................................................................................................... 6 2.1RELIEF FOOD AND TSF .............................................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 HEALTH AND NUTRITION ...................................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE (WASH) .................................................................................................... 12 2.4 AGRICULTURE ..................................................................................................................................................... 14 2.5 EDUCATION ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Monitoring Report Working 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document – Ethiopia Group
    DRMTechnical Periodic Monitoring Report Working 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document – Ethiopia Group Covering 1 Jan to 31 Dec 2016 Prepared by Clusters and NDRMC Introduction The El Niño global climactic event significantly affected the 2015 meher/summer rains on the heels of failed belg/ spring rains in 2015, driving food insecurity, malnutrition and serious water shortages in many parts of the country. The Government and humanitarian partners issued a joint 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document (HRD) in December 2015 requesting US$1.4 billion to assist 10.2 million people with food, health and nutrition, water, agriculture, shelter and non-food items, protection and emergency education responses. Following the delay and erratic performance of the belg/spring rains in 2016, a Prioritization Statement was issued in May 2016 with updated humanitarian requirements in nutrition (MAM), agriculture, shelter and non-food items and education.The Mid-Year Review of the HRD identified 9.7 million beneficiaries and updated the funding requirements to $1.2 billion. The 2016 HRD is 69 per cent funded, with contributions of $1.08 billion from international donors and the Government of Ethiopia (including carry-over resources from 2015). Under the leadership of the Government of Ethiopia delivery of life-saving and life- sustaining humanitarian assistance continues across the sectors. However, effective humanitarian response was challenged by shortage of resources, limited logistical capacities and associated delays, and weak real-time information management. This Periodic Monitoring Report (PMR) provides a summary of the cluster financial inputs against outputs and achievements against cluster objectives using secured funding since the launch of the 2016 HRD.
    [Show full text]