DOCSLIB.ORG

CAS Decisions in a Number of Matters Involving

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CAS Decisions in a Number of Matters Involving Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport MEDIA RELEASE ATHLETICS THE COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT (CAS) DECISIONS IN A NUMBER OF MATTERS INVOLVING RUSSIAN ATHLETES Lausanne, 7 April 2021 – Various Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) panels have issued the following decisions: 1) Awards rendered by CAS following appeals against first-instance decisions issued by CAS acting in lieu of the Russian Athletic Federation CAS 2019/A/6165 Yuliya Kondakova v. World Athletics The appeal filed by Yuliya Kondakova against the first instance decision issued by CAS on 22 February 2019 (CAS 2018/O/5713 IAAF v. RUSAF & Yuliya Kondakova) was partially upheld. The period of ineligibility imposed on Yuliya Kondakova was reduced from 4 years to 2 years and 9 months, applicable from 1 February 2019. All results obtained by Yuliya Kondakova as from 17 July 2012 until 31 December 2014 (inclusive) are withdrawn, with all of the resulting consequences, including forfeiture of any titles, awards, medals, points, prizes and appearance money. This represents a downward reduction from the first-instance decision where her competitive results from 17 July 2012 until 16 July 2016 were disqualified. CAS 2019/A/6166 Svetlana Shkolina v. World Athletics The appeal filed by Svetlana Shkolina against the first-instance decision issued by CAS on 22 February 2019 (CAS 2018/O/5667 IAAF v. RUSAF & Svetlana Shkolina) was partially upheld. The period of ineligibility imposed on Svetlana Shkolina was reduced from 4 years to 2 years and 9 months, applicable from 1 February 2019. All results obtained by Svetlana Shkolina as from 16 July 2012 until 31 December 2014 (inclusive) are withdrawn, with all of the resulting consequences, including forfeiture of any titles, awards, medals, points, prizes and appearance money. This represents a downward reduction from the first-instance decision where her competitive results from 16 July 2012 until 28 July 2015 were disqualified. CAS 2019/A/6167 Ekaterina Galitskaia v. World Athletics The appeal filed by Ekaterina Galitskaia against the first instance decision issued by CAS on 22 February 2019 (CAS 2018/O/5712 IAAF v. RUSAF & Ekaterina Galitskaia) was partially upheld. 2 The period of ineligibility imposed on Ekaterina Galitskaia was reduced from 4 years to 3 years, starting from 1 February 2019. All competitive results obtained by Ekaterina Galitskaia from 15 July 2012 until 31 December 2014 (inclusive) shall remain disqualified, as per the first-instance decision, with all of the resulting consequences, including forfeiture of any titles, awards, medals, points, prizes and appearance money. CAS 2019/A/6168 Ivan Ukhov v. World Athletics The appeal filed by Ivan Ukhov against the first-instance decision issued by CAS on 22 February 2019 (CAS 2018/O/5668 IAAF v. RUSAF & Ivan Ukhov) was partially upheld. The period of ineligibility imposed on Ivan Ukhov was reduced from 4 years to 2 years and 9 months, starting from 1 February 2019. All competitive results obtained by Ivan Ukhov from 16 July 2012 and until 31 December 2014 (inclusive) are disqualified, with all of the resulting consequences, including forfeiture of any titles, awards, medals, points, prizes and appearance money. This represents a downward reduction from the first-instance decision where his competitive results from 16 July 2012 until 31 December 2015 were disqualified. CAS 2019/A/6161 Lyukman Adams v. World Athletics The appeal filed by Lyukman Adams against the first-instance decision issued by CAS on 22 February 2019 (CAS 2018/O/5671 IAAF v. RUSAF & Lyukman Adams) was dismissed and the challenged decision was confirmed. Accordingly, Lyukman Adams remains sanctioned, as per the first-instance decision, with a period of ineligibility of 4 years and all competitive results obtained by him from 16 July 2012 until 14 September 2014 (inclusive) remain disqualified, with all of the resulting consequences, including forfeiture of any titles, awards, medals, points, prizes and appearance money. 2) Awards rendered by CAS following appeals against decisions issued by RUSADA CAS 2020/A/6986 Anna Knyazeva-Shirokova v. Russian Anti-Doping Agency (RUSADA) and CAS 2020/A/6988 Andrey Isaychev v. Russian Anti-Doping Agency (RUSADA) The appeals filed by Anna Knyazeva-Shirokova and Andrey Isaychev against the decisions issued on 17 December 2019 by the Disciplinary Anti-Doping Committee of RUSADA were partially upheld and the challenged decisions were set aside. All individual results earned by both athletes from 15 November 2018 are reinstated. Their requests for financial compensation were dismissed. CAS 2020/A/6987 Rudolf Verkhovykh v. Russian Anti-Doping Agency (RUSADA) The appeal filed by Rudolf Verkhovykh against decision no. 22/2020 issued on 17 December 2019 by the Disciplinary Anti-Doping Committee of RUSADA was dismissed and the challenged decision was confirmed in its entirety. 3) Awards rendered by CAS (first instance) acting in lieu of the Russian Athletic Federation (disciplinary proceedings initiated on the basis of the McLaren reports) CAS 2020/O/6762 World Athletics v. Russian Athletics Federation & Yelena Soboleva Yelena Soboleva has been found guilty of anti-doping rule violations under Rule 32.2 (a) of the IAAF Competition Rules 2006-2007 and under Rule 32.2 (b) of the IAAF Competition Rules 2012- 2013 and sanctioned with a period of ineligibility of 8 years starting from 7 April 2021. All Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport competitive results achieved by Yelena Soboleva from 1 May 2011 through the commencement of her period of provisional suspension on 15 December 2016 are disqualified with all of the resulting consequences, including the forfeiture of any medals, titles, ranking points and prize and appearance money. CAS 2020/O/6759 World Athletics v. Russian Athletic Federation & Natalya Antyukh Natalya Antyukh has been found guilty of an anti-doping rule violation under Rule 32.2(b) of the IAAF Competition Rules 2012-2013 and sanctioned with a period of ineligibility of 4 years starting from 7 April 2021. All competitive results achieved by Natalya Antyukh from 30 June 2013 through the commencement of the period of ineligibility are disqualified with all of the resulting consequences, including the forfeiture of any titles, awards, medals, points and prize and appearance money. CAS 2020/O/6760 World Athletics v. Russian Athletics Federation & Oksana Kondratyeva Oksana Kondratyeva has been found guilty of an anti-doping rule violation under Rule 32.2 (b) of the IAAF Competition Rules 2012-2013 and sanctioned with a period of ineligibility of 4 years starting from 7 April 2021. All competitive results achieved by Oksana Kondratyeva from 2 July 2013 through the commencement of the period of ineligibility are disqualified with all of the resulting consequences, including the forfeiture of any titles, awards, medals, points and prize and appearance money. CAS 2020/O/6761 World Athletics v. Russian Athletics Federation & Andrey Silnov Andrey Silnov has been found guilty of an anti-doping rule violation under Rule 32.2(b) of the IAAF Competition Rules 2012-2013 and sanctioned with a period of ineligibility of 4 years starting on 7 April 2021. All competitive results achieved by Andrey Silnov from 8 July 2013 through the commencement of the period of ineligibility are disqualified with all of the resulting consequences, including the forfeiture of any titles, awards, medals, points and prize and appearance money. For further information related to the CAS activity and procedures in general, please contact either Matthieu Reeb, CAS Director General, or Katy Hogg, Communications Officer. Château de Béthusy, Avenue de Beaumont 2, 1012 Lausanne, Switzerland. [email protected]; Tel: (41 21) 613 50 00; fax: (41 21) 613 50 01, or consult the CAS website: www.tas-cas.org .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Day 5 Programme
    ATHLETICS Day 5 Programme Tuesday 7 August 2012 Timetable Date Time Sex Event Round Morning sesion 07/08 10:00 W Javelin Throw Qualification 07/08 10:10 M 110 Metres Hurdles Heats 07/08 10:45 M Triple Jump Qualification 07/08 10:55 W 5000 Metres Heats 07/08 11:25 W Javelin Throw Qualification 07/08 11:50 M 200 Metres Heats Evening session 07/08 19:00 M High Jump Final 07/08 19:05 W Long Jump Qualification 07/08 19:15 W 100 Metres Hurdles Semi-Final 07/08 19:45 M Discus Throw Final 07/08 19:55 M 800 Metres Semi-Final 07/08 20:25 W 200 Metres Semi-Final 07/08 21:00 W 100 Metres Hurdles Final 07/08 21:15 M 1500 Metres Final Javelin Throw - W Qualification Qual. rule: qualification standard 62.00m or at least best 12 qualify. Group A Tuesday 07 August 2012 - 10:00 Bib Athlete Nat SB PB 1 2 3 1 1643 Nora Aida Bicet ESP 58.82 63.32 2 1242 Laila Ferer e Silva BRA 60.21 60.21 3 1310 Elizabeth Gleadle CAN 61.15 61.15 4 1544 Barbora €pot•kov• CZE 68.73 72.28 5 1494 Yanet Cruz CUB 62.75 63.50 6 3270 Brittany Borman USA 61.51 61.51 7 1876 Goldie Sayers GBR 66.17 66.17 8 1032 Kristine Harutyunyan ARM 59.12 59.12 9 1076 Kimberley Mickle AUS 64.12 64.12 10 3158 Marharyta Dorozhon UKR 61.84 61.84 11 2405 Madara Palameika LAT 61.45 64.51 12 1968 Linda Stahl GER 64.35 66.81 13 2403 Lina Muze LAT 61.04 61.04 14 3311 Kara Patterson USA 60.49 66.67 15 3352 Yusbelys Parra VEN 59.33 59.33 16 1395 Li Zhang CHN 64.74 64.74 17 1091 Elisabeth Eberl AUT 55.80 60.07 18 2954 Tatjana Jelaca SRB 60.89 60.89 19 1956 Christina Obergf‚ll GER 67.04 70.20 20 1442 Flor Ruiz
    [Show full text]
  • High Jump Men
    RESULT LIST High Jump Men RESULT NAME COUNTRY DATE VENUE WR 2.45 Javier Sotomayor CUB 27 Jul 1993 Salamanca WL 2.41 Mutaz Essa Barshim QAT 30 May 2015 Eugene (Hayward Field), OR MR 2.31 Bába Jaroslav CZE 13 Jun 2011 Praha TEMPERATURE HUMIDITY START TIME 18:45 18.4°C 61.5% June 8 2015 END TIME 19:53 17.1°C 64.4% PLACE BIB NAME COUNTRY DATE of BIRTH ORDER RESULT POINTS 2.10 2.15 2.19 2.22 2.25 2.28 2.31 2.33 2.35 1 97 Alexandr Shustov RUS 29 Jun 84 5 2.28 SB - O O O XXO O XXX 2 6 Jaroslav Bába CZE 2 Sep 84 12 2.28 SB - O O - O XO XXX 3 99 Daniyil Tsyplakov RUS 29 Jul 92 8 2.25 - O O O O XXX 4 98 Mihai Donisan ROU 24 Jul 88 7 2.25 O O O XO O XXX 5 100 Vadim Vrublevskiy RUS 18 Jul 93 2 2.25 =PB XO O O XO XO XXX 6 304 Stanys Raivydas LTU 3 Feb 87 3 2.22 O XO O XO XXX 7= 103 Sylwester Bednarek POL 28 Apr 89 11 2.19 O O O - XXX 7= 102 Alexey Dmitrik RUS 12 Apr 84 13 2.19 O O O XXX 9 101 Gianmarco Tamberi ITA 1 Jun 92 9 2.15 O O XXX 10 96 Mickael Hanany FRA 25 Mar 83 6 2.15 XO O XXX 11 104 Kabelo Kgosiemang BOT 7 Jan 86 4 2.15 O XO XXX 105 Wojciech Theiner POL 25 Jun 86 10 DNS 308 Matyáš Dalecký CZE 5 Jan 94 1 NM XXX ALL-TIME TOP LIST 2015 TOP LIST RESULT NAME VENUE DATE RESULT NAME VENUE DATE 2.45 Javier Sotomayor (CUB) Salamanca 27 Jul 1993 2.41 Mutaz Essa Barshim (QAT) Eugene (Hayward 30 May 2.43 Mutaz Essa Barshim (QAT) Bruxelles 5 Sep 2014 2.38 Guowei Zhang (CHN) Eugene (Hayward 30 May 2.42 Patrik Sjöberg (SWE) Stockholm 30 Jun 1987 2.37 Bohdan Bondarenko (UKR) Kawasaki 10 May 2.42 Bohdan Bondarenko (UKR) New York (Icahn), NY 14 Jun 2014
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 World Championships Statistics – Men’S HJ by K Ken Nakamura
    2019 World Championships Statistics – Men’s HJ by K Ken Nakamura The records to look for in Doha: 1) Can Starc become first AUS to win the World Championships? 2) Can Barshim become only the second HJ (after Sotomayor) to win back to back WC? Summary: All time Performance List at the World Championships Performance Performer Height Name Nat Pos Venue Year 1 1 2.41 Bohdan Bondarenko UKR 1 Moskva 2013 2 2 2.40 Javier Sotomayor CUB 1 Stuttgart 1993 3 3 2.38 Patrik Sjöberg SWE 1 Roma 1987 3 3 2.38 Igor Paklin URS 2= Roma 1987 3 3 2.38 Gennadiy Avdyeyenko URS 2= Roma 1987 3 3 2.38 Charles Austin USA 1 Tokyo 1991 3 3 2.38 Mutaz Essa Barshim QAT 2 Moskva 2013 3 3 2.38 Derek Drouin CAN 3 Moskva 2013 Margin of Victory Max 3c m 2.35m Mutaz Essa Barshim QAT London 2017 2.41m Bohdan Bondarenko UKR Moskva 2013 2.40m Javier Sotomayor CUB Stuttgart 1993 2.36m Martin Buss GER Edmonton 2001 2.35m Jacques Freitag RSA Paris 2003 2.32m Yuriy Krimarenko UKR Helsinki 2005 Min 0cm 2. 32m Gennadiy Avd ye yenko URS Helsinki 1983 2.38m Patrik Sjöberg SWE Roma 1987 2.37m Troy Kemp BAH Göteborg 1995 2.35m Donald Thomas BAH Osaka 2007 2.32m Yaroslav Rybakov RUS Berlin 2009 2.35m Jesse Williams USA Daegu 2011 Best Marks for Places in the World Championships Pos Height Name Nat Venue Year 1 2.41 Bohdan Bondarenko UKR Moskva 2013 2.40 Javier Sotomayor CUB Stuttgart 1993 2 2.38 Mutaz Essa Barshim QAT Moskva 2013 Igor Paklin URS Roma 1987 Gennadiy Avdyeyenko URS Roma 1987 3 2.38 Derek Drouin CAN Moskva 2013 2.37 Steve Smith GBR Stuttgart 1993 4 2.36 Dalton Grant GBR Tokyo
    [Show full text]
  • Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games Nomination Criteria
    Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games Nomination Criteria Selection Criteria Amendments • February 19, 2021 o Section 1.2: . Removed reference to NACAC Combined Events Championships, which has been cancelled. The dates and location of the Canadian Combined Events Trials is now to-be-confirmed. Moved the Final Nomination for Marathon and Race Walk to July 2 to align with all other events. Moved the final declaration deadline for all events to June 10, 2021. Updated dates for: Final Preparation Camp, On-site Decision Making Authority, Athletics Competition and Departing Japan o Section 1.3: . Removed requirement to participate in Canadian Championships. Added requirement to comply with COVID-19 countermeasures. o Section 1.6: Added reference to Reserve Athletes. o Section 3: Removed requirement to participate in Canadian Championships. o Section 4.1 . Step 2: Removed: “For the avoidance of doubt, the NTC will not nominate athletes for individual events who are only qualified to be entered due to World Athletics’ “reallocations due to unused quota places” after July 1, 2021 (June 2, 2021 for Marathon and Race Walk).” . Final Nomination Meeting: Added prioritization process for athletes qualifying for both the Women’s Marathon and 10,000m. o Section 4.2: . Removed: “AC will not accept any offers of unused quota places for relay teams made after July 1, 2021;” . Step 1: Removed automatic nomination for national champions. o Section 8: Added language regarding possible further amendments necessitated by COVID-19. • October 6, 2020 o Section 1.2: Updated qualification period to match World Athletics adjustments for Marathon and 50k Race Walk. Updated dates for NACAC Combined Events Championships (Athletics Canada Combined Events Trials).
    [Show full text]
  • START LIST High Jump Men - Qualification
    London World Championships 4-13 August 2017 START LIST High Jump Men - Qualification RECORDS RESULT NAME COUNTRY AGE VENUE DATE World Record WR 2.45 Javier SOTOMAYOR CUB 26 Salamanca (Helmántico) 27 Jul 1993 Championships Record CR 2.41 Bohdan BONDARENKO UKR 24 Moskva (Luzhniki) 15 Aug 2013 World Leading WL 2.38 Mutaz Essa BARSHIM QAT 26 Oslo (Bislett) 15 Jun 2017 i = Indoor performance Group A 11 August 2017 11:15 START TIME ORDER NAME COUNTRY DATE of BIRTH PERSONAL BEST SEASON BEST 1 Bohdan BONDARENKO UKR 30 Aug 89 2.42 2.32 2 Bryan MCBRIDE USA 10 Dec 91 2.30 2.30 3 Ilya IVANYUK ANA 9 Mar 93 2.31i 2.31 i 4 Sylwester BEDNAREK POL 28 Apr 89 2.33i 2.33 i 5 Mutaz Essa BARSHIM QAT 24 Jun 91 2.43 2.38 6 Eike ONNEN GER 3 Aug 82 2.34 2.30 7 Edgar RIVERA MEX 13 Feb 91 2.30i 2.30 i 8 Tihomir IVANOV BUL 11 Jul 94 2.30 2.30 9 Yu WANG CHN 18 Aug 91 2.33 2.30 10 Nauraj Singh RANDHAWA MAS 27 Jan 92 2.30 2.30 11 Talles Frederico SILVA BRA 20 Aug 91 2.30 2.30 12 Robert GRABARZ GBR 3 Oct 87 2.37 2.31 13 Donald THOMAS BAH 1 Jul 84 2.37 2.31 i 14 Ricky ROBERTSON USA 19 Sep 90 2.32 2.30 HEIGHT PROGRESSION 2.17 2.22 2.26 2.29 2.31 Group B 11 August 2017 11:15 START TIME ORDER NAME COUNTRY DATE of BIRTH PERSONAL BEST SEASON BEST 1 Mateusz PRZYBYLKO GER 9 Mar 92 2.35 2.35 2 Michael MASON CAN 30 Sep 86 2.33 2.30 3 Gianmarco TAMBERI ITA 1 Jun 92 2.39 2.28 4 Eure YÁNEZ VEN 20 Jun 93 2.31 2.31 5 Sanghyeok WOO KOR 23 Apr 96 2.30 2.30 6 Takashi ETO JPN 5 Feb 91 2.30 2.30 7 Guowei ZHANG CHN 4 Jun 91 2.38 2.31 8 Jeron ROBINSON USA 30 Apr 91 2.31 2.30 9 Danil LYSENKO
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 European Indoor Championships Statistics – Men HJ
    2021 European Indoor Championships Statistics – Men HJ by K Ken Nakamura Summary Page: All time performance list at the European Indoor Championships Performance Performer Height Name Nat Pos Venue Year 1 1 2.40 Stefan Holm SWE 1 Madrid 2005 2 2 2.39 Patrik Sjöberg SWE 1 Budapest 1988 3 2.38 Patrik Sjöberg 1 Lievin 1987 3 2.38 Patrik Sjöberg 1 Genova 1992 3 3 2.38 Yaroslav Rybakov RUS 2 Madrid 2005 3 3 2:38 Ivan Ukhov RUS 1 Paris 2011 7 5 2.37 Dietmar Mögenburg FRG 2 Budapest 19 88 7 5 2.37 Da lton Grant GBR 1 Paris 1994 Margin of Victory Difference Height Name Nat Venue Year Max 6cm 2.17 Valeriy Skvortsov URS Dortmund 1966 2.35 Vladimir Yashchenko URS Milano 1978 2.32 Gianmarco Tamberi ITA Glasgow 2019 Min 0cm 2.14 Anatoli y Moroz URS Praha 1967 2.17 Valeriy Skvortsov URS Madrid 1968 2.14 Valentin Gavrilov URS Beograd 1969 2.17 Istvan Major HUN Sofia 1971 2.20 Istvan Major HUN Rotterdam 1973 2.26 Vladimir Yashchenko URS Wien 1979 2.33 Dietmar Mögenburg FRG Den Haag 1989 2.31 Artur Partyka POL Valencia 1998 2.34 Vyacheslav Voronin RUS Ghent 2000 2.31 Daniyil Tsyplakov RUS Praha 2015 Best Marks for Places in the European Indoor Championships Pos Height Name Nat Venue Year 1 2.40 Stefan Holm SWE Madrid 2005 2 2.38 Yaroslav Rybakov RUS Ma drid 2005 3 2.36 Gennadiy Avdeyenko URS Lievin 1987 Highest Jump in each round at European Indoor Championships Round Height Name Nat Position Venue Year Final 2.4 0 Stefan Holm SWE 1 Madrid 20 05 First round 2.3 0 Fomenko, Holm, Bettinelli, Rybakov 1q Madrid 2005 Janku 1q Birmingham 2007 Ukhov 1q Torino
    [Show full text]
  • World Athletics U20 Championships General Info Webinar
    World Athletics U20 Championships General Info Webinar Overview • Team Staff • Update on Event Status • Medical Update • Team Selection • Event Logistics • Travel/Environmental Challenges All subject to COVID • Questions & Answers uncertainties Introductions Team Staff Team Coaches Team Leader: James Cunningham Sprints/Hurdles: Molly Killingbeck Head Coach: Jason Reindl Sprints/Hurdles: Rashed Din Team Manager: Nicole Clarke Jumps: Steve Leblanc IST Lead: Mark Gottfried Throws: Georgette Reed Massage Therapist: Carolyn Daubeny Endurance: Andy Tough Doctor: Dr. Ryan Shields Team Objectives To increase the number of Canadian athletes who improve on their pre- event ranking, seasonal best and personal best, number of medals, top 8 and who place in the top half of their field as compared to the most recent World Athletics U20 Championships. Event Status Update on Event Status • World Athletics (WA) update • 100% committed to hosting event • Confirmed they are following ‘similar’ protocols as World Relays (very successful implementation) • Athletics Canada (AC) update • Committed to moving ahead with event at this time • New information will be reviewed as it becomes available • No defined timeline to review decision (will be based on any new info) • Vaccinations • At this time WA and AC will not require vaccination to attend event • Staff – expectation that all staff will be fully vaccinated • Athletes • Very strong recommendation that all athletes have at least one shot, preferably fully vaccinated • Based on age and provincial roll-out,
    [Show full text]
  • World Athletics Continental Tour Requirements Silver Level
    WORLD ATHLETICS CONTINENTAL TOUR REQUIREMENTS SILVER LEVEL Introduction The World Athletics Continental Tour (The Continental Tour) is the road to the major championships for the vast majority of athletes, a destination for fans to see great athletics, plus a celebration of the unique nature of athletics and of the athletes related in each continental Area of the globe. Following widespread consultation, it has been developed by World Athletics, the Area Associations, Meeting Organisers, Athletes and other key stakeholders within the sport. The Continental Tour provides clearly understood differing levels of competition based on prize money and quality of organisation for every international one-day meeting worldwide, provided it fulfils minimum criteria. Indications are that membership of the Continental Tour will be highly sought after. It will also require careful management, with a significant investment of World Athletics resources that includes a wide range of benefits such as World Ranking points, date protection, global link and reach, increased visibility, financial benefits and the wider power of aggregation. The requirements below, which have been set out in consultation with all stakeholders, are intended to ensure that Continental Tour organisers are motivated to provide the highest levels of prize money for athletes and entertainment for broadcaster and stadium spectators. 1. Stadium and Technical Aspects 1.1 Technical Requirements 1.1.1 Mandatory . Minimum Lanes 8 lanes (6 to be considered in exceptional circumstances only) . Track Certification Minimum Class 2 . Equipment World Athletics Certified . Implements Certified (all personal and those provided by the Organiser) . Timing Fully automatic timing obtained from a Photo Finish System .
    [Show full text]
  • World Athletics V Kenneth Kiprop Kipkemoi
    SR/051/2020 IN THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT UNDER THE ANTI-DOPING RULES OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ATHLETICS FEDERATIONS Before: Lucas Ferrer BETWEEN: WORLD ATHLETICS Anti-Doping Organisation and KENNETH KIPROP KIPKEMOI Respondent DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL I. INTRODUCTION 1. The Claimant, World Athletics (“WA”) (formerly International Association of Athletics Federation (“IAAF”)), is the international federation governing the sport of athletics worldwide. It has its registered seat in Monaco. World Athletics is represented in these proceeding by the Athletics Integrity Unit (“AIU”) which has delegated authority for results management and hearings, amongst other functions relating to the implementation of the IAAF Anti-Doping Rules (“ADR”), on behalf of WA pursuant Article 1.2 of the ADR. 2. The Respondent, Mr. Kenneth Kiprop Kipkemoi (“Mr. Kipkemoi” or “the Athlete”) is a 35-year old long-distance runner from Kenya. 3. The alleged Anti-Doping Rule Violations (“ADR Violations”) relate to alleged violations of Articles 2.1 and 2.2 of the ADR. Mr. Kipkepmoi faces the following charges: the presence of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers (Terbutaline) in the Sample collected from him on 12 September 2019, and the use of a Prohibited Substance (Terbutaline). Terbutaline is a Prohibited Substance, prohibited at all times under the WADA 2019 Prohibited List under the category S3, Beta-2-Agonists. 4. What follows below is the decision of the WA Disciplinary Tribunal convened under Article 8.4 of the ADR to determine the ADR violations alleged against Mr. Kipkemoi. II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 5. On 12 September 2019, the Athlete participated in an Out-Of-Competition doping control in Kaptagat, Kenya, and provided a urine sample (“the Sample”) coded 3142239.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN ATHLETICS 2017-18 Results Issue N.7
    EUROPEAN ATHLETICS 2017-18 results issue n.7 AUSTRIA Wien (Austria), 3-4.2.2018 -National Championships in Combined Events- Men 60m (3) 1 Markus Fuchs 6.74; 2 Simon Bujna (svk) 6.80; 2 Roman Turcani (svk) 6.89 Heptathlon (3-4) 1 Dominik Distelberger 5.973p (6.93; 7.40; 12.84; 1.95 - 7.96; 4.90, 2.40.42); 2 Florian Maier 5.135p (7.34; 6.76; 13.60; 1.92 - 8.79; 4.10; 2.52.44) Women 60m (3) Alexandra Toth 7.48; 200m (3) Alexandra Toth 24.30 1h1; Magdalena Lindner (2000) 24.83 1h3 Pentathlon (4) 1 Ivona Dadic 4.692p (8.39; 1.82; 14.25; 6.22.; 2.13.15); 2 Sarah Lagger 4.319p (8.81; 1.76; 13.73; 5.70; 2.14.05); 3 Karin Strametz 4.300p (8.43; 1.70; 11.93; 6.17; 2.17.72); 4 Andrea Obetzhofer 3.824p (8.98; 1.70; 13.77; 5.39; 2.36.17); 5 Lena Lackner 3.685p (8.70; 1.58; 11.65; 5.50; 2.36.17) BELARUS Gomel (Belarus), 2-3.2.2018 -National Championships in Combined Events- Men Heptathlon (2-3) Vitaliy Zhuk 5.632p (7.15; 6.97; 15.39; 1.95 - 8.22; 4.50; 2.52.86) Women Pentathlon (2) 1 Yana Maksimova 4.353p (8.77; 1.80; 14.14; 5.68; 2.17.32); 2 Maryia Bachko 3.908p (8.87; 1.71; 11.59; 5.83; 2.31.64); 3 Sharlota Paehlitse 3.800p (8.71; 1.65; 10.46; 5.71; 2.28.50) Gomel (Belarus), 3.2.2018 -Belarus Cup- Men 60m Aliaksandr Linnik 6.88 800m Petr Khodasevich 1.50.43 3.000m Artsiom Logish 8.15.71 60mh Vitaliy Parahonka 7.82 HJ 1 Dzmitri Nabokou 2.28; 2 Andrei Skobeyka 2.26 PV 1 Vladislau Chemarmazovich 5.40; 2 Lev Skorish 5.20 LJ 1 Artsiom Gurin 7.73; 2 Aliaksei Chigoreuski 7.56 TJ 1 Artsiom Bondarenko 16.30; 2 Dzmitri Plotnitski 16.29 SP 1 Aliaksei Nichipor
    [Show full text]
  • Study on High Jumpers on the Word
    Ovidius University Annals, Series Physical Education and Sport / SCIENCE, MOVEMENT AND HEALTH Vol. XII, ISSUE 2 Supplement 2012, Romania The journal is indexed in: Ebsco, SPORTDiscus, INDEX COPERNICUS JOURNAL MASTER LIST, DOAJ DIRECTORY OF OPEN ACCES JOURNALS, Caby, Gale Cengace Learning STUDY ON HIGH JUMPERS ON THE WORD GHEORGHE DANIEL1 Abstract Purpose. This work has proposed that purpose, to separate the essential data for selection and training high performance athletes in the perspective of major international competition. Methods. As research methods I used the case study, observation and statistics. Results. For the final selection to the Olympics, to accede to one of the medals, the athlete’s performance should be over 2.30 m. If we have several athletes with special performances, we should focus primarily on those with a richer experience, with several international competitions, so a little older. Conclusions. In 2 of the 5 Olympics, the performance for the first place is equal to the average top, which confirms first hypothesis. The top average age is 24 years and 7 months which confirms the second hypothesis. The third hypothesis is confirmed with the observation that for the Olympics the performance is the supreme criterion, the height isn’t a decisive criterion (there are medalists with height below top average). The hypothesis of the athlete’s weight isn’t confirmed, recording an average of 77,36 kg. We only have significant correlation between athlete’s height and weight. Key words: athletes, performance, statistics. Introduction the essential data for selection and training high The present study is an analysis of the finalists performance athletes in the perspective of major from the last two Olympics and the first three of the international competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Aiu Update on Disciplinary Proceedings Against Athletes Asserted to Have Breached Anti-Doping Rules During the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games
    PRESS RELEASE AIU UPDATE ON DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST ATHLETES ASSERTED TO HAVE BREACHED ANTI-DOPING RULES DURING THE TOKYO 2020 OLYMPIC GAMES 12 AUGUST 2021, MONACO: In accordance with the IOC Anti-Doping Rules and the World Athletics Anti-Doping Rules, the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) has commenced disciplinary proceedings to determine any consequences beyond the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games to be imposed upon four (4) track and field athletes who are asserted to have committed anti- doping rules violations following testing conducting by the International Testing Agency (ITA) during the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games. The ITA, who are responsible for testing at the Olympic Games on behalf of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), had asserted anti-doping rule violations and provisionally suspended, the athletes listed below, during the Games. 1. Sadik Mikhou (BRN) – 1500m - Presence/use of a Prohibited Method (Blood Transfusion) 2. Benik Abramyan (GEO) – Shot Put - Presence/use of a Prohibited Substance (DHCMT, Metandienone, Tamoxifen) 3. Mark Otieno Odhiambo (KEN) – 100m - Presence/use of a Prohibited Substance (Methasterone) Following the conclusion of the Tokyo Olympic Games, the doping control laboratory in Tokyo also notified the ITA of an additional Adverse Analytical Finding from testing conducted during the Games: 4. Chijindu Ujah (GBR) – 4X100m - Presence/use of a Prohibited Substance (Ostarine and S-23) The AIU worked closely with the ITA during the Games and provided the intelligence to carry out specific target testing on two of the four athletes. The AIU now awaits the conclusion of the ITA proceedings against the above athletes, which will determine whether any anti-doping rule violations have been committed and what consequences (if any) should be imposed in relation to the Olympic Games.
    [Show full text]