Hermeneutics and Exegesis in the Early Eucharistic Controversy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hermeneutics and Exegesis in the Early Eucharistic Controversy HERMENEUTICS AND EXEGESIS IN THE EARLY EUCHARISTIC CONTROVERSY Amy Nelson Burnett Translation, exegesis, and hermeneutics were closely intertwined in the sixteenth century.* If Scripture was the ultimate source of religious author- ity, it must not only be available in a language that was widely understood, but its contents must be explained correctly and in a way that accorded with the fundamental tenets of the Christian faith. While all evangelicals agreed that the Bible should be translated into the language of the people, they did not necessarily agree either on the proper exegesis of specifijic pas- sages or on the hermeneutical principles according to which that exegesis was done. This disagreement is most obvious with regard to the Scripture verses related to the Eucharist. All participants in the debate over the Lord’s Supper could draw on a long exegetical tradition for those passages that concerned the sacrament, extending from the church fathers through the scholastic theologians of the late Middle Ages. Heretical groups such as the Waldensians, the Lollards, and various Hussite factions also cited Scripture to defend their understanding of the sacrament; their ideas cir- culated in Germany and Switzerland on the eve of the Reformation and were incorporated into the evangelical debate as well.1 * The following abbreviations have been used: ASD: Desiderius Erasmus, Opera Omnia Desiderii Erasmi Roterodami, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1969-; CS: Kaspar Schwenckfeld, Corpus Schwenckfeldianorum, Breitkopf and Härtel, Leipzig, 1907–1961; CWE: Desiderius Erasmus, Collected Works of Erasmus, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1974-; EPK: Amy Nelson Burnett (ed.), The Eucharistic Pamphlets of Andreas Bodenstein von Karlstadt, Truman State University Press, Kirksville MO, 2011; HZW: Edward J. Furcha and H. Wayne Pipkin (eds.), Huldrych Zwingli: Writings, Pickwick Press, Allison Park, Pa., 1984; LB: Jean Le Clerc (ed.), Desiderii Erasmi Roterodami Opera Omnia, Leiden, 1703–1706, repr. Gregg, London, 1962; LCC: Geofffrey W. Bromiley (ed.), Zwingli and Bullinger: Selected Translations with Introductions and Notes, Library of Christian Classics 24, Westminster Press, Philadelphia, 1953; LW: Martin Luther, Luther’s Works, Muhlenberg Press, Philadelphia, 1955–1986; MPL: J.-P. Migne (ed.), Patrologiae Cursus Completus, Series Latina, Paris, 1844–1864; WA: Martin Luther, Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe, Weimar, 1883–1986; Walch: Johann Georg Walch (ed.), Dr. Martin Luthers Sämmtliche Schriften, St. Louis, 1881–1910; Z: Ulrich Zwingli, Huldreich Zwinglis Sämtliche Werke, Leipzig/Zurich, 1905–1991. 1 For the example of the Hussites, see Amy Nelson Burnett, Karlstadt and the Origins of the Eucharistic Controversy: A Study in the Circulation of Ideas, Oxford University Press, New York, 2011, pp. 78–83. 86 amy nelson burnett Much of this exegetical debate is ignored, however, by the tendency of modern descriptions of the eucharistic controversy to focus on the public exchange between Martin Luther and Huldrych Zwingli that began in the spring of 1527.2 This approach ignores the fact that by the time the two reformers fijirst addressed each other, the controversy was already over two years old.3 Andreas Bodenstein von Karlstadt’s eucharistic pamphlets published in the fall of 1524 began the public debate concerning the pres- ence of Christ’s body and blood in the bread and wine of the sacrament. Over the course of 1525–1526, authors on both sides published at least sixty-fijive works that directly addressed the question of Christ’s corporeal presence; other pamphlets took up the issue as a secondary topic. Since many of these tracts were printed more than once, the total number of pamphlets related to the eucharistic controversy published during this period was almost three times as high. These fijigures make clear that Luther and Zwingli were not the only individuals involved in the eucharistic controversy. Luther published only seven contributions to the debate before 1527, the most important being his enormously influential Against the Heavenly Prophets, published in two parts at the turn of 1524/25 and frequently reprinted over the next year.4 During this same period Zwingli published a dozen treatises arguing against Christ’s corporeal presence in the elements, none of which was reprinted as often as Luther’s pamphlets. Other participants in the debate ranged from the well-known, such as Zwingli’s counterpart in Basel, Johann Oecolampadius, who published seven pamphlets, to the obscure, such as the pseudonymous Conrad Ryss zu Ofen, whose true identity is still debated by scholars.5 Looking only at the treatises of Luther and 2 This is especially true of accounts of the controversy in English. Hermann Sasse, for instance, looks at the earlier writings of the two reformers but covers the debates of 1524– 1526 in only a few pages, This is my Body. Luther’s Contention for the Real Presence in the Sacrament of the Altar, Augsburg Press, Minneapolis, 1959, pp. 137–142. 3 Luther’s fijirst major work aimed against Zwingli and all others who denied Christ’s corporeal presence), Daß diese Wort Christi “Das ist mein Leib” noch fest stehen wider die Schwärmgeister, WA 23: 64–320, LW 37: 13–150, was published in time for the Frankfurt book fair in the spring of 1527, as were Zwingli’s Freundlich Verglimpfung über die Predigt Luthers wider die Schwärmer, Z 5:771–794, and Amica Exegesis, Z 5: 562–758, HZW 2: 238–385. 4 The other contributions were the prefaces to two diffferent translations of Johannes Brenz’s Syngramma…super uerbis Coenae Dominicae (WA 19: 457–461, 529–530), his open letters to Strasbourg (1524; WA 15: 380–397, LW 40: 61–71) and Reutlingen (1526; WA 19: 118– 125) warning against the teachings of Karlstadt and Zwingli, and his Sermon von dem Sacrament…wider die Schwarmgeister (WA 19: 478–523; LW 36: 329–361) published in 1526 without Luther’s involvement. 5 Luther’s Das ander teyl widder die hymlischen propheten vom Sacrament, which attacked Karlstadt’s understanding of the Lord’s Supper, was printed ten times in 1525. .
Recommended publications
  • Ulrich Zwingli & the Swiss Reformation
    Ulrich Zwingli & the Swiss Reformation 1. Ulrich Zwingli: Texts & Translations 2. Ulrich Zwingli: Biographies & Studies 3. Menno Simons & the Anabaptists: Studies & Texts 4. Special Topics 1. ZWINGLI: BIOGRAPHY & THEOLOGY W.P. Stephens, Zwingli: An Introduction to His Thought (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994) paperback. A fine study of the Swiss reformer and patriot. Zwingli battled fiercely with Luther over the eucharist and with the Anabaptists over infant baptism. An intriguing and controversial figure who gave the Swiss reformation its unique stamp. Ulrich Gabler, Huldrych Zwingli: His Life and Work, trans. Ruth C.L. Gritsch (1986; reprint: London: T&T Clark, 1999). Charles Garside, Zwingli and the Arts (reprint of Yale Press edition: DaCapo Press, 1981). G.R. Potter, Zwingli (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976). Bart Jan Spruyt, ed., Cornelius Henrici Hoen (Honius) and His Epistle on the Eucharist (1525): Medieval Heresy, Erasmian Humanism, and the Reform of Early Sixteenth-Century Low Countries (Leiden: Brill, 2006). W.P. Stephen, The Theology of Huldrych Zwingli (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986). Lee Palmer Wandel, Always Among Us: Images of the Poor in Zwingli’s Zurich (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003). 2. ZWINGLI: TEXTS G.W. Bromiley, ed., Zwingli and Bullinger, Library of Christian Classics (reprint of 1953 edition: Nashville: Westminster John Knox, 1973). Ulrich Zwingli, On Providence and Other Writings, ed. Samuel M. Jackson (Durham: Labyrinth Press, 1983; reprint of 1922 edition). 1 Bibliographies for Theology, compiled by William Harmless, S.J. Ulrich Zwingli, Commentary on True and False Religion, ed. Samuel M. Jackson & Clarence N. Heller (Durham: Labyrinth Press, 1981; reprint of 1929 edition).
    [Show full text]
  • Huldrych Zwingli the Implementation of the Lord’S Supper
    Huldrych Zwingli The Implementation of the Lord’s Supper Translation and Introduction by Jim West Occasional Publications of the Pitts Theology Library Published by the generous support of Dr. and Mrs. Walker L. Ray in honor of Susan Snow Hope Publisher’s Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Zwingli, Ulrich, 1484-1531, author. | West, Jim, 1960- translator. Title: The Implementation of the Lord’s Supper / Huldrych Zwingli ; translation and Introduction by Jim West. Other Tites: Action oder Brauch des Nachtmals. English Description: Atlanta: Pitts Theology Library, [2016] | Series: Occasional Publications of the Pitts Theology Library Subjects: Lord’s Supper -- Early works to 1800 | Reformed Church -- Doctrines. | Reformation -- Switzerland -- Zurich. Classifcation: LCC BR346.A2813 2016 | DDC 230.4--dc23 1 cult project himself. His translation translation His himself. project cult f dif this undertook then and translation for scholarly engagement with Zwingli’s work, helped us identify a Zwingli pamphlet pamphlet Zwingli a identify us helped work, Zwingli’s with engagement scholarly . We are delighted that Dr. Jim West, widely known for his his for known widely West, Jim Dr. that delighted are We . century sixteenth the Supper, one of the most divisive issues among Protestants in the third decade of of decade third the in Protestants among issues divisive most the of one Supper, to document the vigorous debate between Luther and Zwingli about the Lord’s Lord’s the about Zwingli and Luther between debate vigorous the document to lecture at the 2011 Reformation Day at Emory. This rare volume was acquired acquired was volume rare This Emory. at Day Reformation 2011 the at lecture Valerie Hotchkiss for her her for Hotchkiss Valerie Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • The People's Reformation
    CHRISTIAN HISTORY Issue 118 The People’s Reformation How religious upheaval birthed social revolution Second in a four-part series on the Reformation REFORMING QUEEN Anne Boleyn (near left) shared Tyndale’s banned book The Obedience of a Christian Man (1528) with Henry VIII. She supposedly handed this small Bible containing her husband’s portrait (far left) to one of her maids of honor on the scaffold. CHECKING IT TWICE As Zwingli and other clergy trans- lated the Bible (below) into the Swiss vernacular, he read the proof sheets to his wife every night. Did you know? HERE ARE SOME OF THE MOST EXTRAORDINARY PEOPLE OF THe “People’s Reformation” TAH TAH THE ZWINGLI YOU NEVER KNEW U As a youth Huldrych Zwingli (1484–1531), leader of the ROVO, Swiss Reformation, learned violin, harp, flute, dulci- P mer, hunting horn, and lute. He amused children from alone at night and to watch his food carefully for fear his congregation by playing the lute for them, and ene- of poison. In the end Zwingli died in a battle between NIVERSITY, mies called him “that evangelical lute-player and fifer.” Protestant and Catholic cantons, believing he was fight- U OUNG Yet he opposed instrumental music in worship (as well ing to preserve the freedom to preach the Gospel. His Y as choral music and chanting) and presided over break- last words were reportedly: “They can kill the body but ing up the great organ in his church in Zurich. Open to not the soul.” congregational singing, he wrote at least three hymns.
    [Show full text]
  • Huldrych Zwingli and His City of Zurich*
    Andrews Uniuersity Seminary Studies, Summer 1985, Vol. 23, No. 2, 143-1150, Copyright @ 1985 by Andrews University Press. HULDRYCH ZWINGLI AND HIS CITY OF ZURICH* ULRICH GABLER Free University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, The Netherlands One of the most fascinating aspects of Huldrych Zwingli's life is its multi-faceted character.' From the beginning of his work in Zurich in 1519, Zwingli became more and more active in a variety of roles and came to be involved in the most divergent issues. For the biographer, this situation creates considerable difficulty in find- ing the real thread of Zwingli's life and activity, if there is truly any such. Where, for instance, is the center in 1526 (if I may choose an arbitrary year) for a person engaged in the following tasks?: parish priest at the Grossmiinster, the main church of Zurich; a com- mentator and translator of the OT at the "Prophezei," * the Bible school; and expositor of the NT at the Fraumiinster, the second most important church of the city; a weekly preacher there; a theologian in the conflict with Luther about the Lord's Supper; a polemicist against Johannes Eck in the controversy over church authority; a defender of his own work against the Anabaptists; the "brain" behind the plan for a war against the Catholics in +Adapted and revised from a paper presented at Andrews University on May 9, 1984, and submitted as an article in the original Dutch to the Nederlands Archief voor Kerkgeschiedenis under the title "Huldrych Zwingli in zijn milieu" (forth- coming, as of the present writing).
    [Show full text]
  • What Did Huldrych Zwingli Achieve for the Swiss Reformation?
    What did Huldrych Zwingli achieve for the Swiss Reformation? Roger Porter Department of Theology Flinders University Abstract Huldrych Zwingli was a key figure in the Swiss Reformation. It was concluded that recognition of his contribution has, over time, dissipated and largely unacknowledged. Further research into Zwingli studies is warranted, highly recommended and already long overdue. Introduction: The Genesis of the Swiss Reformation The events of the Swiss Reformation were significantly influenced by Huldrych 1 Zwingli (1484-1531). His tragic death on the front line of a Swiss civil war in 1531 ended a career vitally important to the Protestant Reformation in Europe and abroad. Nevertheless, Zwingli was the only major reformer of the 16 th century whose vision and movement, despite his momentous achievements, did not develop into a church. Although defects of disjointedness and intellectualism mark his writings behind them lay an open, warm and friendly disposition, embodying a courageously arresting attempt to rethink all Christian doctrine in consistently biblical terms. This essay will illustrate how Huldrych Zwingli’s achievements were pivotal to the success of the Swiss Reformation, and the Reformation in general. His accomplishments will be noted in their various time periods together with the relevant historical events. It will be argued that, jointly with Martin Luther and John Calvin, Zwingli was a key individual in the 16 th century Reformation, and that his achievements contributed significantly to this momentous event in European history. Firstly, the key achievements of Huldrych Zwingli will be noted. These include (1) his breaking with Rome in 1522 by rejecting the Catholic co-ordination of scripture and tradition, (2) his replacing the Catholic mass in 1525 with the first Reformed communion service in the Zurich Great Minster Church and (3) his spreading the Swiss Reformation to other German and Italian Cantons of Switzerland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reformation Continues
    4 The Reformation Continues MAIN IDEA WHY IT MATTERS NOW TERMS & NAMES RELIGIOUS AND ETHICAL Many Protestant churches began •predestination • Catholic SYSTEMS As Protestant during this period, and many • Calvinism Reformation reformers divided over Catholic schools are the result • theocracy •Jesuits beliefs, the Catholic Church of reforms in the Church. •Presbyterian • Council of made reforms. • Anabaptist Trent SETTING THE STAGE Under the leadership of Queen Elizabeth I, the Anglican Church, though Protestant, remained similar to the Catholic Church in many of its doctrines and ceremonies. Meanwhile, other forms of Protestantism were developing elsewhere in Europe. Martin Luther had launched the Reformation in northern Germany, but reformers were at work in other countries. In Switzerland, another major branch of Protestantism emerged. Based mainly on the teachings of John Calvin, a French follower of Luther, it promoted unique ideas about the relationship between people and God. TAKING NOTES Calvin Continues the Reformation Comparing Use a chart Religious reform in Switzerland was begun by Huldrych Zwingli (HUL•drykh to compare the ideas of ZWIHNG•lee), a Catholic priest in Zurich. He was influenced both by the the reformers who came Christian humanism of Erasmus and by the reforms of Luther. In 1520, Zwingli after Luther. openly attacked abuses in the Catholic Church. He called for a return to the more personal faith of early Christianity. He also wanted believers to have more con- Reformers Ideas Zwingli trol over the Church. Calvin Zwingli’s reforms were adopted in Zurich and other cities. In 1531, a bitter Anabaptists war between Swiss Protestants and Catholics broke out.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCTRINE of ORIGINAL SIN in the EVANGELICAL REFORMERS T a Noble
    DOCTRINE OF ORIGINAL SIN IN THE EVANGELICAL REFORMERS T A Noble The ‘Evangelical’ Reformers are those giants of Christian history who reformed the Church Catholic (or at least part of it) in the sixteenth century. We conventionally call them the Protestant Reformers, but ‘Protestant’ was from its beginning a political word signifying those princes of the Holy Roman Empire who banded together to make their protest at the Diet of Speyer. The more appropriate theological term is Luther’s own term, ‘Evangelical’, referring to those who sought to reform the life and theology of the one holy, Catholic Church according to the Evangel—the Gospel. That is a significant starting point in a paper which sets out to examine the Reformers’ doctrine of original sin, for it reminds us that original sin was not their starting point or foundation. It was rather for them a doctrine which was implied by the Gospel. LUTHER We begin with a study of Luther, and with the picturesque passage from the Table Talk brought to our attention by Paul M. Bassett: The original sin in a man is like his beard, which, though shaved off today so that a man is very smooth around his mouth, yet grows again by tomorrow morning. As long as a man lives, such growth of hair and beard does not stop. But when the shovel slaps the ground on his grave, it stops. In just this way, original sin remains in us and exercises itself as long as we live, but we must resist it and always be cutting off its hair.1 Before we conclude that Luther is a virulent feminist (since having no beards, women presumably have no original sin!), we have to remind ourselves that this is ‘table talk’, picturesque speech, metaphor.
    [Show full text]
  • Luther and Zwingli at Marburg (1529) Evangelical Theological Soci
    Defining the Boundaries of Evangelicalism in the 16th Century: Luther and Zwingli at Marburg (1529) Evangelical Theological Society November 14-16, 2001 Cameron A. MacKenzie Concordia Theological Seminary - Ft. Wayne, IN Do Evangelicals like to fight? One would almost think so given the number of controversies that have marred the story of the modern Evan- gelical movement – Calvinists vs. Arminians, pre-millennialists vs. post, egalitarians vs. complementarians, and, of course, open theists vs. tradi- tional theists. A moment’s reflection, however, suggests that it is not a delight in polemics per se that has motivated all these folks through the ages and in our own times too but instead, ironically, something that they all have in common, viz., a commitment to truth. Evangelicals of all stripes believe that there is such a thing as truth in matters religious, and that it is important – so important that one is willing not only to con- tend for it in this life but also to stand upon it before the Lord in the next. For He who has revealed Himself as the Way, the Truth, and the Life calls upon all of us to be faithful to His truth. But if controversies among Evangelicals demonstrate one common commitment, can they reveal others? And if we are looking for the boun- daries of the Evangelical movement, can analysis of past debates reveal parameters within which combatants were operating? To be sure, the Scriptures must ultimately determine what it means to be “evangelical”; but perhaps historical analysis can highlight characteristics of our movement that we might otherwise miss.
    [Show full text]
  • Pentecostal Aspects of Early Sixteenth Century Anabaptism
    PENTECOSTAL ASPECTS OF EARLY SIXTEENTH CENTURY ANABAPTISM By CHARLES HANNON BYRD II A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Theology and Religion School of Philosophy, Theology and Religion College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham September 2009 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract Early sixteenth century radical Anabaptism emanated in Switzerland during Huldrych Zwingli’s protest against the Roman Catholic Church. Much like Martin Luther, Zwingli founded his reform effort on the Bible being the final arbiter of the faith, sola scriptura, and the sufficiency of the shed blood of Christ plus nothing for eternal salvation, sola fide. Based on these principles both adopted the doctrine of the Priesthood of the Believer which recognized every believer’s Spirit empowered ability to read and interpret the Bible for themselves. These initial theological tenets resulted in the literal reading of the Bible and a very pragmatic Christian praxis including a Pauline pneumatology that recognized the efficacy of the manifestation of the charismata. Radical adherents of Zwingli rejected infant baptism as being totally unbiblical and insisted upon the rebaptism of adults, but only on a personal confession of faith, thus the term Anabaptist.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eucharist Controversy Between Huldrych Zwingli and Martin Luther
    Tenor of Our Times Volume 5 Article 7 Spring 2016 The uppS er that Supposedly Split the Reformation: The uchE arist Controversy Between Huldrych Zwingli and Martin Luther Jacob A. Clayton Harding University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.harding.edu/tenor Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Clayton, Jacob A. (Spring 2016) "The uS pper that Supposedly Split the Reformation: The uchE arist Controversy Between Huldrych Zwingli and Martin Luther," Tenor of Our Times: Vol. 5, Article 7. Available at: https://scholarworks.harding.edu/tenor/vol5/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Humanities at Scholar Works at Harding. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tenor of Our Times by an authorized editor of Scholar Works at Harding. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SUPPER THAT SUPPOSEDLY SPLIT THE REFORMATION: THE EUCHARIST CONTROVERSY BETWEEN HULDRYCH ZWINGLI AND MARTIN LUTHER By Jacob A. Clayton On March 15, 1529, various German princes and representatives of the Holy Roman Empire (HRE) attended the second Diet of Speyer. This meeting dealt with the political upheavals rising from the religious movements of Martin Luther and others. The Diet decided to suppress these religious movements in order to restore Catholicism to the various principalities of the Holy Roman Empire.1 However, the leaders of fourteen cities signed a protest and appeal because they were a part of the new religious movements. Thus, the other Catholic leaders called the dissenting leaders “Protestants.”2 Philip of Hesse, one of the Protestant leaders, wanted to unite all Protestants in order to counter the papal forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Zwinglianism: Stepping out of Luther's Shadow Sarah Bischoff La Salle University
    The Histories Volume 7 | Issue 1 Article 3 Zwinglianism: Stepping Out of Luther's Shadow Sarah Bischoff La Salle University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/the_histories Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Bischoff, Sarah () "Zwinglianism: Stepping Out of Luther's Shadow," The Histories: Vol. 7 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/the_histories/vol7/iss1/3 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Scholarship at La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The iH stories by an authorized editor of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Histories. Volume 7, Number 1 8 II Zwinglianism: Stepping Out of Luther’s Shadow By Sarah Bischoff ‘08 As a theologian during the Swiss Reformation, Huldrych Zwingli is often overshadowed by the achievements and success of Martin Luther’s Protestant movement. Bom less than two months apart from each other, both men were significant figures during the Renaissance and each advocated his own specific theology. It has been believed that Zwingli was greatly influenced by Luther’s written texts and relied on them when forming his own religious program. However, Zwingli’s own spiritual transformation was a result of several different influences in his life. He did not read much, if any, of Luther’s writings until after this turning point. Instead, “Zwingli’s development was determined by the (changing) circumstances in Zurich, the news about the exciting events concerning Luther (for example, at the Diet of Worms), and his own reading of the Bible, the church fathers, and contemporary literature.”1 Patriotism, scholasticism, and the humanists, especially Erasmus, had a great impact on him.
    [Show full text]
  • Reformed Confessions List: Vol. 1 Introduction 1. Huldrych Zwingli
    Reformed Confessions of the 16th and 17th Centuries in English Translation: 4 Vols. Set (1523-1693) James T. Dennison, Jr. Reformed Confessions List: Vol. 1 Introduction 1. Huldrych Zwingli, Sixty-Seven Articles (1523) 2. Huldrych Zwingli, Short and Christian Instruction (1523) 3. The Ten Theses of Bern (1528) 4. The Confession of the East Friesland Preachers (1528) 5. William Farel, Summary (1529) 6. Huldrych Zwingli, Fidei ratio (1530) 7. The Tetrapolitan Confession (1530) 8. Confession of the Vaudois (1530 or 1531) 9. Huldrych Zwingli, Exposition of Christian Faith (1531) 10. Articles of the Bern Synod (1532) 11. The Synod of Chanforan (1532) 12. The Confession of Angrogna (1532) 13. The (First) Basel Confession (1534) 14. The Bohemian Confession (1535) 15. The Lausanne Articles (1536) 16. The First Helvetic Confession (Second Basel Confession) (1536) 17. John Calvin’s Catechism (1537) 18. John Calvin, Geneva Confession of Faith (1536/37) 19. John Calvin, Catechism (1538) 20. Waldensian Confession of Merindol (1541) 21. The Confession of the Waldensians of Provence (1543) 22. The Confession of the Vaudois of Merindol (1543) 23. Walloon Confession of Wessel (1544/45) 24. John Calvin, Catechism (1545) 25. Juan Diaz, Suma de la Relijion Cristiana (1546) 26. Juan Valdes, Catechism (1549) 27. Consensus Tigurinus (1549) 28. Thomas Cranmer, Anglican Catechism (1549) 29. The London Confession of John à Lasco (1551) 30. The Large Emden Catechism; or Catechism of the Immigrant Church in London (1551) 31. The Confession of the Glastonbury Congregation (1551) 32. Confessio Rhaetiae (1552) 33. John Calvin, Consensus Genevensis (1552) Vol. 2 34. The Forty-Two Articles of the Church of England (1552/53) 35.
    [Show full text]