Buletin Ştiintific ¸

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Buletin Ştiintific ¸ NOGRAF ET IE Ş E I D I ISSN 1857-0054 L S T A O N R O I I E Ţ N A A N T L U U R E A Z Muzeul Naţional de Etnografie şi Istorie Naturală L U Ă M BULETIN ŞTIINTIFIC¸ Revistă de Etnografie, Ştiinţele Naturii şi Muzeologie - serie nouă - Chişinău 2013 Chişinău Volumul 18 (31) Volumul ¸ TIINTIFIC Ş ¸ tiintele Naturii Ş BULETIN Volumul 18 (31) Ştiintele¸ Naturii Chişinău 2013 Muzeul Naţional de Etnografie şi Istorie Naturală a Moldovei BULETIN şTIINţIFIC Revistă de Etnografie, Ştiinţele Naturii şi Muzeologie Nr. 18 (31) Serie nouă Fascicula ştiinţele Naturii National Museum of Ethnography and Natural History of Moldova SCIENTIFIC BULLETIN Ethnography, Natural Sciences and Museology No 18 (31) New series Branch Natural sciences Национальный Музей природы и этнографии Молдовы БЮЛЛЕТЕНЬ этнография, естественные науки и музеология № 18 (31) Новая серия Ecтественные науки Chişinău, 2013 Colegiul de redacţie Preşedinte – Mihai URSU Redactor responsabil pentru Fascicula Ştiinţele Naturii – prof. Valeriu DERJANSCHI Redactor ştiinţific pentru Fascicula Etnografie şi Muzeologie – dr. Varvara BUZILĂ Membri: Dr. Varvara BUZILĂ, secretar ştiinţific, MNEIN; dr. Jennifer CASH, lector asociat la Institutul de Antropologie Socială Max Plank din Halle, Germania; dr. hab. Grigore CĂPĂŢINĂ– cercetător ştiinţific coordonator, MNEIN; dr. Constantin Gh. CIOBANU – redactor-coordonator, MNEIN; Maria CIOCANU – şef Secţie Etnografie, MNEIN; dr. Mihai DĂNCUȘ – profesor universitar, directorul Muzeului Etnografic al Maramureşului, Sighetul Marmaţiei, România; dr. hab. Valeriu DERJANSCHI – profesor cercetător, şef Laborator Entomologie la Institutul de Zoologie al AȘM, redactor ştiinţific pentru Fascicula Ştiinţele Naturii, MNEIN; dr. Emil ŢÎRCOMNICU – cercetător grd. II, Institutul de Etnografie şi Folclor „C. Brăiloiu”, Bucureşti, România; dr. hab. Natalia KALAȘNICOVA – profesor universitar, Universitatea de Stat din Sankt-Petersburg, Muzeul Etnografic al Popoarelor din Rusia; dr. Olga LUCHIANEŢ – cercetător ştiinţific principal, MNEIN; dr. Istvan MATCASI – directorul Muzeului de Istorie Naturală din Ungaria; dr. Marianne MESNIL – directorul Centrului de Etnologie, Universitatea Liberă din Bruxelles, Belgia; dr. Vintilă MIHAILESCU – profesor universitar, Universitatea din Bucureşti, România; dr. Sergiu PANĂ – şef Secţie Ştiinţele Naturii, MNEIN, secretar de redacţie pentru Fascicula Ştiinţele Naturii; dr. hab. Petru TARHON – profesor universitar, cercetător ştiinţific principal, MNEIN; dr. Vladimir ROȘCA – cercetător ştiinţific superior, MNEIN; dr. hab. Eugen SAVA – director general al Muzeului Naţional de Arheologie şi Istorie a Moldovei; Vladimir SEMENENCO – şef Secţie Paleontologie şi Stratigrafie a Institutului de Știinţe Geologice din Kiev, Ucraina; dr. Barbara STUDENSCA – şef Secţie Paleontologie, Muzeul Terrei al Academiei de Știinţe a Poloniei, Varşovia; dr. Elena ȘIȘCANU, cercetător ştiinţific coordonator, MNEIN. Studiile şi articolele din acest volum au fost discutate în cadrul sesiunilor de comunicări ştiinţifice ale Muzeului Naţional de Etnografie şi Istorie Naturală, fiind recomandate spre publicare de către Consiliul Ştiinţific al Muzeului Buletin Știinţific. Revistă de Etnografie, Scientific Bulletin. Ethnography, Ştiinţele Naturale şi Muzeologie Natural Sciences and Museology Str. Mihail Kogălniceanu, nr. 82 MD-2009, 82 Mihail Kogălniceanu st. Chişinău, Republica Moldova, MD-2009 Chişinău, Republic of Moldova, Telefon: 022-24-40-02. Phone: 022-24-40-02. Telefax: 022-23-88-48 Fax: 022-23-88-48 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Redacţia ştiinţifică: Constantin Gh. CIOBANU – Șef Redacţie Traducere în engleză: Andrei FIODOROV Tehnoredactare şi copertă: Nicolae CHERDIVARă Muzeul Naţional de Etnografie şi Istorie Naturală a Moldovei str. Mihail Kogălniceanu, nr. 82 Chişinău, Republica Moldova, MD-2009. Telefon: 022-23-88-12. Telefax: 022-23-88-68 E-mail: [email protected] ISSN 1857-0054 © Muzeul Naţional de Etnografie şi Istorie Naturală a Moldovei 3 SUMAR BOTANICĂ ......................................................................................................... 7 Nina CIOCÂRLAN. – Medicinal Lamiaceae species of the wild flora of the Republic of Moldova and their curative importance .................................................. 8 Veaceslav GHENDOV. – The distribution and conservation status of new and threatened Alliaceae species in the flora of the Republic of Moldova ................ 13 Natalia JARDAN, Vitalie GOGU. – Flora vasculară de pădure din rezervaţia ştiinţifică „Codrii” ........................................................................................................... 17 Boris NEDBALIUC, Eugenia CHIRIAC,Veaceslav CÂRLIG, Rodica NEDBALIUC. – Structura taxonomică şi caracteristica saprobiologică a algoflorei cursului inferior al râului Ichel ..................................................................................................... 32 ZOOLOGIE ........................................................................................................ 41 Aurelian Leonardo ILIE, Mariana MARINESCU. – The population dynamics of some aquatic birds in the Tinca area (Bihor country Romania) ......................... 42 Elvira MACOVEI. – Prezenţa familiei Cantharidae (Coleoptera) în colecţiile din România .................................................................................................................... 46 Эдуард Хейфец. – Происхождение спирулы (Spirula spirula Linnaeus, 1758) ... 49 А.В. ЧереВАтоВ, Я.И. ИВАноВИЧ, р.А. ВолкоВ. - Полиморфизм 5S рибосомной Днк у Polyommatus icarus (Insecta, Lepidoptera) ....................... 64 В.М. ЧХИкВАДзе, л.ф. МАзАнАеВА, т.о кВАЧАДзе. – Cухопутные черепахи кавказа и Северо-западного Ирана ....................................................... 72 MICROBIOLOGIE ........................................................................................... 87 Светлана БУрцеВА, ольга ПоСтолАкИй, Антонина БрАтУХИнА. – Состав популяции стрептомицетов после хранения в лиофилизированном состоянии ............................................................................ 88 Leonid ONOFRAŞ, Vladimir TODIRAŞ, Tatiana MOHOVA, Svetlana PRISACARI, Angela LUNGU, Maria MELNIC, Ştefan RUSU. – Perspectiva utilizării bacteriilor de nodozităţi din genul Rhizobium în scopul stimulării creşterii şi dezvoltării plantelor cerealiere .................................................................... 97 Tamara SÎRBU. – Activitatea catalazei Penicilium funiculosum în dependenţă de factorii utilizaţi în mediul de cultivare .................................................................. 104 FIZIOLOGIE ..................................................................................................... 111 Iurie BACALOV, Irina BACALOV, Sergiu DOBROJAN, Aurelia CRIVOI, Sergiu PANă, Elena CHIRIŢA. – Formula leucocitară în diabetul experimental pe fondul administrării extrasului din spirulină crescută pe ape reziduale ........... 112 Aurelia CRIVOI, Elena CHIRIŢA, Iurie BACALOV, Sergiu PANă, Ana MăRJINEANU. – Efectul tincturii de propolis la şobolanii cu diabet alloxanic ... 118 Valeria VRABIE, Valentina CIOCHINă, Teodor FURDUI, Valeriu DERJANSCHI. – Proprietăţile biochimice ale zerului ca supliment proteic la hrănirile de primăvară timpurie ale familiilor de albine ..................................... 124 ECOLOGIE ...................................................................................................... 133 Andrian ŢUGULEA. – Evaluarea fluxului de transport auto şi intensităţii poluării pe unele artere din ecosistemul urban Chişinău ........................................................... 134 Maria MELNIC, Sergiu PANă. – Dinamica nematodelor parazite la plantele lemnoase şi dependenţa ei de factorii climatici ...................................................... 142 PALEONTOLOGIE .......................................................................................... 151 Анатолие ДАВИД, Виорика ПАСкАрЬ. – териофауна и экологическая обстановка перигляциальной зоны Поздневалдайского оледенения северо- запада и севера республики Молдова .................................................................... 152 Volumul 18 (31) Buletin Ştiinţific. Revistă de Etnografie, Ştiinţele Naturii şi Muzeologie 4 PEDOLOGIE ..................................................................................................... 159 Tamara COJUHARI, Tatiana VRABIE, Igor KRUPENIKOV , Petru STRATULAT, Liudmila CRIVOV, Veaceslav VORONŢOV, Pavel KOTERNEAK. – Caracterizarea stării fizice a solurilor de pădure din suprafeţele de supravegere din rezervaţia „Codrii” (I) ............................................................................................ 160 DIVERSE ........................................................................................................... 167 Constantin MANOLACHI, Mihai URSU. – Din istoria protecţiei naturii în Basarabia .................................................................................................................. 168 Grigori CAPAŢINA. – Cuantumul valoric al strugurilor – căi autentice de propăşire .................................................................................................................... 179 Petru TARHON. – Parcul dendrologic din satul Miciurin (Ghica Vodă), raionul Drochia ................................................................................... 182 RECENZII ......................................................................................................... 187 Vladimir Filipciuc, Vladimir
Recommended publications
  • CRASSULACEAE 景天科 Jing Tian Ke Fu Kunjun (傅坤俊 Fu Kun-Tsun)1; Hideaki Ohba 2 Herbs, Subshrubs, Or Shrubs
    Flora of China 8: 202–268. 2001. CRASSULACEAE 景天科 jing tian ke Fu Kunjun (傅坤俊 Fu Kun-tsun)1; Hideaki Ohba 2 Herbs, subshrubs, or shrubs. Stems mostly fleshy. Leaves alternate, opposite, or verticillate, usually simple; stipules absent; leaf blade entire or slightly incised, rarely lobed or imparipinnate. Inflorescences terminal or axillary, cymose, corymbiform, spiculate, racemose, paniculate, or sometimes reduced to a solitary flower. Flowers usually bisexual, sometimes unisexual in Rhodiola (when plants dioecious or rarely gynodioecious), actinomorphic, (3 or)4– 6(–30)-merous. Sepals almost free or basally connate, persistent. Petals free or connate. Stamens as many as petals in 1 series or 2 × as many in 2 series. Nectar scales at or near base of carpels. Follicles sometimes fewer than sepals, free or basally connate, erect or spreading, membranous or leathery, 1- to many seeded. Seeds small; endosperm scanty or not developed. About 35 genera and over 1500 species: Africa, America, Asia, Europe; 13 genera (two endemic, one introduced) and 233 species (129 endemic, one introduced) in China. Some species of Crassulaceae are cultivated as ornamentals and/or used medicinally. Fu Shu-hsia & Fu Kun-tsun. 1984. Crassulaceae. In: Fu Shu-hsia & Fu Kun-tsun, eds., Fl. Reipubl. Popularis Sin. 34(1): 31–220. 1a. Stamens in 1 series, usually as many as petals; flowers always bisexual. 2a. Leaves always opposite, joined to form a basal sheath; inflorescences axillary, often shorter than subtending leaf; plants not developing enlarged rootstock ................................................................ 1. Tillaea 2b. Leaves alternate, occasionally opposite proximally; inflorescence terminal, often very large; plants sometimes developing enlarged, perennial rootstock.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments Contributors: Printing was made possible through the generous funding from Adkins Arboretum; Baltimore County Department of Environmental Protection and Resource Management; Chesapeake Bay Trust; Irvine Natural Science Center; Maryland Native Plant Society; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; The Nature Conservancy, Maryland-DC Chapter; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Cape May Plant Materials Center; and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Reviewers: species included in this guide were reviewed by the following authorities regarding native range, appropriateness for use in individual states, and availability in the nursery trade: Rodney Bartgis, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Ashton Berdine, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Chris Firestone, Bureau of Forestry, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Chris Frye, State Botanist, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Mike Hollins, Sylva Native Nursery & Seed Co. William A. McAvoy, Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. Mary Pat Rowan, Landscape Architect, Maryland Native Plant Society. Rod Simmons, Maryland Native Plant Society. Alison Sterling, Wildlife Resources Section, West Virginia Department of Natural Resources. Troy Weldy, Associate Botanist, New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Graphic Design and Layout: Laurie Hewitt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Special thanks to: Volunteer Carole Jelich; Christopher F. Miller, Regional Plant Materials Specialist, Natural Resource Conservation Service; and R. Harrison Weigand, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Maryland Wildlife and Heritage Division for assistance throughout this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Fv{Âçä~|ÄÄ Géãçá{|Ñ CHESTER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA
    fv{âçÄ~|ÄÄ gÉãÇá{|Ñ CHESTER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA cxÇÇáçÄätÇ|t fàtàx YÄÉãxÜ `ÉâÇàt|Ç _tâÜxÄ NATIVE PLANT LIST A RESIDENT’S GUIDE 2017 fv{âçÄ~|ÄÄ gÉãÇá{|Ñ CHESTER COUNTY NATIVE PLANT LIST A Resident’s Guide Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 So what exactly is a Native Plant? ................................................................. 1 Go native with these 6 basics: ........................................................................ 2 In Summary ....................................................................................................... 4 NATIVE PLANT LIST OVERVIEW ............................................................................. 5 TREES ................................................................................................................. 6 EVERGREEN ................................................................................................... 6 DECIDUOUS ................................................................................................... 6 FLOWERING ................................................................................................... 7 SHRUBS .............................................................................................................. 8 EVERGREEN ................................................................................................... 8 DECIDUOUS ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Crassulaceae Stonecrop Family
    Crassulaceae stonecrop family Mainly northern, this family is represented in Nova Scotia by only a few species out of a total of 300. Page | 491 They are succulent herbaceous plants, bearing small yellow, white or pink flowers. Sepals and petals are five-merous; stamens number twice as many as the petals. Pistils 3–5; fruit is a follicle. Best-known as rock garden ornamentals, we have a single native species.(Key adapted from Go Botany). Key to genera A. Plants annual; aquatic or amphibious; flowers solitary; leaves connate around Crassula the stem. aa. Plants perennial; terrestrial; flowers usually in cymes; leaves not as above. B B. Leaves entire; plants matted with creeping stems. Sedum bb. Leaves toothed; plants with upright stems, which may be C decumbent at the base, or from stolons. C. Flowers unisexual, 4-merous; fertile stems from axils of Rhodiola brown scalelike leaves from fibrous roots. cc. Fowers bisexual, 5-merous; fertile stems from roots or D stolons. D. Plants mat-forming from creeping horizontal Phedimus stems; leaves opposite. dd. Plants not forming mats; leaves alternate, Hylotelephium opposite or whorled. Crassula L. Cosmopolitan in distribution, of the 250 species only one reaches NS. Most are succulent, their leaves opposite. One species of Africa known in horticulture as the Jade Plant, is a Crassula. Crassula aquatica (L.) Schonl. Pigmyweed; tillée aquatique A tiny tufted annual, it rarely exceeds 10cm in height. It is mat-forming with small sessile, linear and opposite leaves. Flowers are solitary and axillary, barely 1mm wide. Flowers from July to September. Habitat preferences are narrow: brackish muddy shores and Photo by Sean Blaney sand flats or borders of muddy ponds along the coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracheophyte of Xiao Hinggan Ling in China: an Updated Checklist
    Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e32306 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.7.e32306 Taxonomic Paper Tracheophyte of Xiao Hinggan Ling in China: an updated checklist Hongfeng Wang‡§, Xueyun Dong , Yi Liu|,¶, Keping Ma | ‡ School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China § School of Food Engineering Harbin University, Harbin, China | State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China ¶ University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China Corresponding author: Hongfeng Wang ([email protected]) Academic editor: Daniele Cicuzza Received: 10 Dec 2018 | Accepted: 03 Mar 2019 | Published: 27 Mar 2019 Citation: Wang H, Dong X, Liu Y, Ma K (2019) Tracheophyte of Xiao Hinggan Ling in China: an updated checklist. Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e32306. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e32306 Abstract Background This paper presents an updated list of tracheophytes of Xiao Hinggan Ling. The list includes 124 families, 503 genera and 1640 species (Containing subspecific units), of which 569 species (Containing subspecific units), 56 genera and 6 families represent first published records for Xiao Hinggan Ling. The aim of the present study is to document an updated checklist by reviewing the existing literature, browsing the website of National Specimen Information Infrastructure and additional data obtained in our research over the past ten years. This paper presents an updated list of tracheophytes of Xiao Hinggan Ling. The list includes 124 families, 503 genera and 1640 species (Containing subspecific units), of which 569 species (Containing subspecific units), 56 genera and 6 families represent first published records for Xiao Hinggan Ling. The aim of the present study is to document an updated checklist by reviewing the existing literature, browsing the website of National Specimen Information Infrastructure and additional data obtained in our research over the past ten years.
    [Show full text]
  • Generic Dividion of Sedoideae in Europe and the Adjacent Regions
    Preslia, Praha, 56: 29 - 45, 1984 Generic dividion of Sedoideae in Europe and the adjacent regions R odove cleneni podceledi S edoideae v Evrope a prilehlych oblastech Vit Grulich GRULICH V. ( 1984): Gene ric rl ivision of sub f. Sedoidene in Europe and tl1c adjacent regions. - Prcslia, Praha, 56 : 29 - 45. Europe and the a djaeent parts of North Africa and \Vest Asia contain ea. 120 sp ecies of s u bf. Sedoidene. The genus Sedum L. is especially hct.Progeneous and is composed of several natural groups whose cvaluat,ion until now has been unsatisfactory. Some groups arc closely allied to othe r recently distinguis hed gflmwa, and it is necessary to treat them as separate genera . Therefore genera A izopsis GRULTCH, Asterosedum GRUL!CH, P etrosedum GrmLLCH and Oreosedum GRULICH arc- rl escribed. Regional Museum, 69215 i\1ikulov, Czechoslovakia The taxonomic classification of succulents is difficult, because the varia­ bility of most species is fairly large and the phenomenon of succulence often conditions convergencies. Several species (including many cultivars) are used in horticulture, which tends to co mplicate their taxonomy. All species of the family Orassulaceae are of succulent habit. The generic division of this family is most unclear, sinee extreme types have been classed as monotypic genera, e.g. Pagella ScHONL. Further taxa are natural, e.g. subf. Sempervivoideae, Hylotelephium 0HBA, Umbilicus DC. Many species, however, remain in two polymorphic genera Crassula L. and Sedum L. , each with numerous species, and whose differentiation from the other genera is not clear. Most of the "intermediate" types create difficulties, especially when using classic morphological methods based on their succulent parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Crassulaceae – Stonecrop (Sedum) Family
    CRASSULACEAE – STONECROP (SEDUM) FAMILY Plant: annual or mostly perennial herbs (succulent) or shrubs Stem: sometimes with rhizomes Root: sometimes thickened Leaves: simple, alternate to opposite, sometimes whorled (also basal), thick and fleshy; no stipules Flowers: mostly perfect, regular (actinomorphic); flower star-like; (3)4-5(-9) sepals; (3)4-5(-9) petals, a scale-like gland sometimes at base of each petal; 4-5(9) stamens or 2x the petals; ovary superior, 3 to many carpels and often same number as sepals/petals (rarely greater) Fruit: follicle Other: large family, widespread; Dicotyledons Group Genera: 35+ genera; locally Crassula, Hylotelephium [Sedum] (stonecrop), Sempervivum (hen and chickens) WARNING – family descriptions are only a layman’s guide and should not be used as definitive Flower Morphology in the Crassulaceae (Stonecrop or Sedum Family) Examples of some common genera Ditch Stonecrop Live-Forever [Witch's Moneybags] Widow’s Cross Penthorum sedoides L. Hylotelephium telephium (L.) H. Ohba. ssp. telephium Sedum pulchellum Michx. [Sedum purpureum] (Introduced) Stringy [Whorled-Leaved] Stonecrop Sedum sarmentosum Bunge (Introduced) Chandelier Plant [Kalancho] Ledge Stonecrop [Kings Crown] Kalanchoe delagoensis Eckl. & Zeyh. (Introduced) Rhodiola integrifolia Raf. CRASSULACEAE – STONECROP (SEDUM) FAMILY Live-Forever [Witch's Moneybags]; Hylotelephium telephium (L.) H. Ohba. ssp. telephium [Sedum purpureum] (Introduced) Chandelier Plant [Kalancho]; Kalanchoe delagoensis Eckl. & Zeyh. (Introduced) Ditch Stonecrop; Penthorum sedoides L. Ledge Stonecrop [Kings Crown]; Rhodiola integrifolia Raf. Redpod Stonecrop [Queens Crown]; Rhodiola rhodantha (A. Gray) H. Jacobsen Spear- [Lance-] leaf Stonecrop; Sedum lanceolatum Torr. Widow’s Cross; Sedum pulchellum Michx. Stringy [Whorled-Leaved] Stonecrop; Sedum sarmentosum Bunge (Introduced) Woodland Stonecrop; Sedum ternatum Michx. Live-Forever [Witch's Moneybags] USDA Hylotelephium telephium (L.) H.
    [Show full text]
  • Next-Generation Genome Sequencing of Sedum Plumbizincicola Sheds
    plants Article Next-Generation Genome Sequencing of Sedum plumbizincicola Sheds Light on the Structural Evolution of Plastid rRNA Operon and Phylogenetic Implications within Saxifragales 1,2, 1, 1 3 1 1 Hengwu Ding y, Ran Zhu y, Jinxiu Dong , De Bi , Lan Jiang , Juhua Zeng , Qingyu Huang 1, Huan Liu 3, Wenzhong Xu 4, Longhua Wu 3,* and Xianzhao Kan 1,2,* 1 The Institute of Bioinformatics, College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241000, Anhui, China; [email protected] (H.D.); [email protected] (R.Z.); [email protected] (J.D.); [email protected] (L.J.); [email protected] (J.Z.); [email protected] (Q.H.) 2 The Provincial Key Laboratory of the Conservation and Exploitation Research of Biological Resources in Anhui, Wuhu 241000, Anhui, China 3 National Engineering Laboratory of Soil Pollution Control and Remediation Technologies, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, China; [email protected] (D.B.); [email protected] (H.L.) 4 Key Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (L.W.); [email protected] (X.K.); Tel.: +86-25-8688-1128 (L.W.); +86-139-5537-2268 (X.K.) These authors equally contributed to this work. y Received: 27 August 2019; Accepted: 28 September 2019; Published: 29 September 2019 Abstract: The genus Sedum, with about 470 recognized species, is classified in the family Crassulaceae of the order Saxifragales. Phylogenetic relationships within the Saxifragales are still unresolved and controversial.
    [Show full text]
  • Hylotelephium Spectabile, a New Host for Carnation Tortrix Moth (Cacoecimorpha Pronubana) and Molecular Characterization in Greece
    insects Communication Hylotelephium spectabile, a New Host for Carnation Tortrix Moth (Cacoecimorpha pronubana) and Molecular Characterization in Greece Konstantinos B. Simoglou 1,* , Dimitrios N. Avtzis 2, Joaquín Baixeras 3, Ioanna Sarigkoli 1 and Emmanouil Roditakis 4,* 1 Department of Quality and Phytosanitary Inspections, Rural Economy & Veterinary Directorate of Drama, 66133 Drama, Greece; [email protected] 2 Forest Research Institute, Hellenic Agricultural Organization Demeter, Vassilika, 57006 Thessaloniki, Greece; [email protected] 3 Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de València, Carrer Catedràtic José, 46980 Paterna, Spain; [email protected] 4 Department of Agriculture, School of Agricultural Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Greece * Correspondence: [email protected] (K.B.S.); [email protected] (E.R.) Simple Summary: Hylotelephium spectabile (Saxifragales, Crassulaceae), a widespread ornamental plant was found infested by larvae of Cacoecimorpha pronubana (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) a highly polyphagous pest of a wide range of crop, as well as ornamental plants. To the best of our knowledge, this finding suggests that H. spectabile should be considered a new host plant for C. pronubana. Moreover, molecular characterization of the Greek pest population place it along with European species clade. Citation: Simoglou, K.B.; Avtzis, D.N.; Baixeras, J.; Sarigkoli, I.; Abstract: Cacoecimorpha pronubana (Hübner) (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) is a highly polyphagous Roditakis, E. Hylotelephium spectabile, pest of a wide range of crop and ornamental plants. It is of Mediterranean origin and widespread a New Host for Carnation Tortrix Moth (Cacoecimorpha pronubana) and in European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO) region. For the first time, Molecular Characterization in Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • HABITAT - the Arrangement of Food, Water, Cover, and Space - IS the KEY
    HABITAT - the arrangement of food, water, cover, and space - IS THE KEY. In This Issue: Native Plant Profile: Sedums Maryland Native Wildlife: Common Five-lined Skink Habitat Tip: Xeriscaping Habitat Tips: Minimizing Pesticide Impacts to Pollinators Backyard Wildlife Fun for Kids: Reptile Safari Citizen Science: Cricket Crawl Printer-Friendly Version Forward Welcome to the Summer Issue of Habi-Chat! This issue focuses on a variety of summer topics from succulent sedums to xeriscaping backyards! This issue also has a short article on ways to minimize pesticide impacts to pollinators. As you may have noticed, our website is under construction. Please update your Wild Acres website links to our new page here: http://dnr2.maryland.gov/wildlife/Pages/habitat/wildacres.aspx If there is a particular topic that you would like to see on our site, then please don’t hesitate to contact me to let me know! My information can be found at the bottom of this newsletter. Happy Summer! 1 Maryland Native Plant Profile: Sedums (Sedum spp.; Hylotelephium spp.) Sedums (Sedum spp.; Hylotelephium spp.) are a mix of succulents in the Stonecrop (Crassulaceae) family. Most of Maryland’s native sedums are fleshy groundcovers with star-shaped flowers. These species include the rare cliff stonecrop (Sedum glaucophyllum), stringy stonecrop (Sedum sarmentosum), and woodland stonecrop (Sedum ternatum). Allegheny stonecrop (Hylotelephium telephioides) is a larger wildflower with clusters of small, pinkish-white flowers. Sedums come in all shapes, sizes and colors! Photo by: Eric Hunt, Flickr CC As a group, sedums are typically easy-to-grow flowering perennials which thrive in sunny, dry areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Ornamental Plants with Summer Bloom and Fruit in the Virginia Native Plant Garden
    Green Spring Gardens 4603 Green Spring Rd ● Alexandria ● VA 22312 Phone: 703-642-5173 ● TTY: 703-803-3354 www.fairfaxcounty.gov/parks/greenspring ORNAMENTAL PLANTS WITH SUMMER BLOOM AND FRUIT IN THE ­ VIRGINIA NATIVE PLANT GARDEN ­ Scientific Name of Ornamental Plants Common Name Month of Bloom Color of with Summer Bloom Bloom (June, July, and/or August) Allium cernuum Nodding Wild Onion June, July Light pink Amsonia tabernaemontana & Eastern Bluestar June Light blue ’Montana’ (heavier in May) Andropogon gerardii Big Bluestem August Green turning coppery Anemone virginiana Tall Anemone, Thimbleweed June, July White to whitish Aquilegia canadensis Wild Columbine Scattered bloom Red & yellow sometimes in June & July (heaviest in spring) Aralia racemosa (herbaceous perennial) Spikenard, American Spikenard July, August Greenish or white A. spinosa (shrub) Devil's Walking Stick White Aristolochia macrophylla Pipevine, Dutchman’s Pipe June Green & brownish (Isotrema macrophyllum in the Flora of purple Virginia but not the accepted name) Asclepias exaltata Poke Milkweed June White A. purpurascens Purple Milkweed Pinkish purple A. tuberosa Butterfly Weed June, July, August Orange Note: keep removing A. syriaca (Common Milkweed) - spreads too readily in the Native Mixed Border; enjoy in the Concentric Garden and the Entrance Garden. Aster (now reclassified into various genera – see under Doellingeria, Eurybia, & Symphyotrichum) 1 Baptisia alba White Wild Indigo June White B. australis Blue Wild Indigo (heavier bloom Blue earlier for the first
    [Show full text]
  • Pollen Morphology of the Family Crassulaceae from Pakistan and Kashmir and Its Taxonomic Implications
    Pak. J. Bot. 47(4): 1481-1493, 2015. POLLEN MORPHOLOGY OF THE FAMILY CRASSULACEAE FROM PAKISTAN AND KASHMIR AND ITS TAXONOMIC IMPLICATIONS MUHAMMAD QAISER, ANJUM PERVEEN AND GHULAM RASOOL SARWAR Centre for Plant Conservation, University of Karachi, Karachi-75270, Pakistan Abstract Pollen morphology of 28 species representing 9 genera viz., Bryophyllum, Kalanchoe, Pseudosedum, Rhodiola, Rosularia, Hylotelephium, Sedum, Tillaea and Orostachys of the family Crassulaceae from Pakistan has been studied by light and scanning electron microscope. Pollen grains are usually free, radially symmetrical, isopolar, sub-oblate to oblate- spheroidal, or prolate–spheroidal to subprolate often prolate and tricolporate. Tectum mostly striate-rugulate or sub-psilate rarely reticulate-rugulate. Significant variation is found in shape and exine ornamentation and on the basis these characters family has been divided into three pollen types’ viz., Rhodiola sinuata–type, Rosularia viguieri–type and Sedum hispanicum–type. Numerical analysis of based on pollen characters of 28 species was also carried out to determine the phylogenetic relationships of various genera and the species of the family Crassulaceae. Key words: Crassulaceae, Eurapalynous, Exine ornamentation and Pollen shape. Introduction intergenic region (cpDNA) in Sedum (Crassulaceae) and geographic distribution. There are no reports on the pollen Crassulaceae, a family of about 33 genera and c. 1500 morphology of the family Crassulaceae from Pakistan and species is distributed all over the world, more Kashmir. However, Numarical taxonomy of the Sedum and predominantly in the temperate and subtropical zones of Rosularia from Pakistan has been studied by Sarwar & the northern hemisphere and Africa (Mabberely, 1987). Qaiser (2011, 2012) respectively. Present study is the first Represented in Pakistan by 9 genera and 32 species study of pollen morphology of the family Crassulaceae from (Sarwar, 2002).
    [Show full text]