Rare Bone Diseases and Their Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Manifestations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rare Bone Diseases and Their Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Manifestations vol. 93 • issue 7 • suppl no. 1 JDR Clinical Research Supplement CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ORAL BIOLOGY & MEDICINE Rare Bone Diseases and Their Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Manifestations B.L. Foster1*, M.S. Ramnitz2, R.I. Gafni3, A.B. Burke3, A.M. Boyce3,4,5, J.S. Lee6, J.T. Wright7, S.O. Akintoye8, M.J. Somerman1,9, and M.T. Collins3 Abstract: Hereditary diseases affecting the skeleton and DOC complex, and Bone Disease Patient Network at the skeleton are heterogeneous in etiol- treatments. By understanding how http://www.usbji.org/projects/RBDPN_ ogy and severity. Though many of these these 4 foci are subverted to cause dis- op.cfm). Rare disorders are difficult to conditions are individually rare, the ease, we aim to improve the identifica- diagnose and are easily misdiagnosed; total number of people affected is great. tion of genetic, molecular, and/or bio- those of the skeleton are no exception. These disorders often include dental- logic causes, diagnoses, and treatment While progress has been made in oral-craniofacial (DOC) manifesta- of these and other rare bone conditions our understanding of the underlying tions, but the combination of the rar- that may share underlying mechanisms causes, pathologies, and mechanisms ity and lack of in-depth reporting often of disease. of bone diseases, those of the dental- limit our understanding and ability oral-craniofacial (DOC) complex are to diagnose and treat affected individ- Key Words: fibrous dysplasia frequently overlooked or superficially uals. In this review, we focus on den- of bone, osteogenesis imperfecta, reported. This has implications in terms tal, oral, and craniofacial manifesta- familial hypophosphatemic rickets, of understanding, diagnosing, and tions of rare bone diseases. Discussed hypophosphatasia, hyperphosphatemic treating affected individuals, in turn are defects in 4 key physiologic pro- familial tumoral calcinosis, Gorham-Stout affecting health and quality of life. cesses in bone/tooth formation that disease. Proper formation of the skeleton serve as models for the understand- and dentition requires integration of ing of other diseases in the skeleton Introduction numerous processes beginning in early and DOC complex: progenitor cell dif- embryonic development. These include ferentiation (fibrous dysplasia), extra- Hereditary diseases affecting the patterning of the head, limbs, and cellular matrix production (osteo- skeleton, which we define to include skeletal/dental elements, cell migration genesis imperfecta), mineralization the craniofacial and dental structure, and proliferation, differentiation to (familial tumoral calcinosis/hyperos- are heterogeneous in etiology, onset, specialized cells, matrix secretion, tosis hyperphosphatemia syndrome, and severity. Although many of these biomineralization of bones and teeth, hypophosphatemic rickets, and hypo- conditions are individually rare (affecting and remodeling of bone. For purposes phosphatasia), and bone resorption less than 1 in 200,000), the total number of this review, we discuss 4 processes (Gorham-Stout disease). For each con- of people affected is great (see the directly affecting the formation and dition, we highlight causative muta- National Organization for Rare Disorders function of craniofacial bones and teeth tions (when known), etiopathology in at www.rarediseases.org and the Rare (Fig. 1) that can serve as models for an DOI: 10.1177/0022034514529150. 1National Institute for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; 2National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; 3Skeletal Clinical Studies Unit, Craniofacial and Skeletal Diseases Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; 4Bone Health Program, Division of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA; 5Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA; 6Office of Clinical Director, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA;7 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; 8Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; and 9National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; *corresponding author, [email protected] A supplemental appendix to this article is published electronically only at http://jdr.sagepub.com/supplemental. © International & American Associations for Dental Research 7S JDR Clinical Research Supplement July 2014 Figure 1. Diseases affecting specific stages of bone formation and remodeling. This model outlines key stages of bone development (differentiation of stem/progenitor cells, matrix production, mineralization, and resorption) affected by the genetic disorders highlighted in this review. For each developmental process (indicated by text boxes), associated diseases caused by defects in that process are identified. Tooth development depends on parallel processes outlined for bone formation, though notably does not undergo physiological resorption as part of a remodeling process. understanding of basic pathophysiologic Defective Stem/Progenitor NFκB ligand (RANKL), both of which processes in the broader sense: Cell Differentiation contain cAMP response elements in their progenitor cell differentiation, promoters (Riminucci et al., 2003). The extracellular matrix production, Fibrous Dysplasia outcome is abnormal bone formation mineralization, and resorption, a key step Fibrous dysplasia of bone (FD; MIM and remodeling characterized by fibrous in remodeling of bone, but not teeth. For 174800) is caused by somatic activating tissue proliferation and expansion of the each of these processes, we highlight a mutations in the GNAS gene encoding the marrow or diploë by fibrous tissue that disease or small number of diseases that G-protein-coupled receptor-associated contains immature, structurally abnormal occur(s) when that stage goes awry. By 3′, 5′-cyclic adenosine monophosphate woven bone (Riminucci et al., 1997). discussing mechanisms of how bone and (cAMP)-regulating protein, Gsα. The phenotype is broad, ranging from tooth functions are negatively affected in Mutations result in ligand-independent a single skeletal site (monostotic) to these specific cases, we aim to identify activation of the cAMP signaling pathway massive disease affecting multiple bones patterns that can ultimately be applied (Weinstein et al., 1991). In skeletal tissues, (polyostotic) (Fig. 2A). The phenotype is to improve the identification of genetic, overproduction of cAMP impairs the determined by when, and in which clonal molecular, and/or biologic causes of ability of bone-forming mesenchyme cell in the inner cell mass, the sporadic additional diseases by their shared to transition from stem-like immature mutation arises during development. The skeletal and dental etiopathologies. cells to mature osteogenic cells. There degree of clinical sequelae likewise varies, Appendix Table 1 summarizes additional is increased secretion of interleukin-6 from asymptomatic to disfigurement conditions under each disease process. and expression of receptor activator for with loss of function, including blindness 8S vol. 93 • issue 7 • suppl no. 1 JDR Clinical Research Supplement and deafness. When extra-skeletal sites Intramedullary fixation devices are collagen propeptide) (Byers and are involved, such as skin (café-au- preferred for orthopedic procedures. Pyott, 2012; Martinez-Glez et al., lait macules) (Fig. 2B) and/or gonads However, craniofacial surgery should 2012). (precocious puberty) (Fig. 2C), the be undertaken with caution because of Craniofacial and dental features for disease is known as McCune-Albright potential for the rapid regrowth of FD OI types III and IV are summarized syndrome (MAS). Hyperthyroidism, lesions. Optic nerve decompression is in Fig. 3. Affected individuals suffer hypophosphatemia, and growth hormone contraindicated in cases where nerves are from decreased bone mineral density, excess can also occur in FD/MAS constricted but vision is unaffected (Lee increased fracture risk, deformations, (Figs. 2D, 2E). Craniofacial bones are et al., 2002). Bisphosphonates are helpful short stature, kyphoscoliosis, craniofacial the most commonly involved skeletal to treat bone pain; however, no clear deformities, and a tooth phenotype sites in FD, especially the skull base, radiographic, functional, or histologic resembling dentinogenesis imperfecta maxilla, and midface (Lee et al., 2002; benefits have been demonstrated. There (DI). Wormian bones (intrasutural Kelly et al., 2008) (Figs. 2A, 2F, 2G). is evidence suggesting that, with age, bones with unusually situated centers There can be extensive expansion of mutant progenitor cells fail to self-renew, of ossification) are associated with OI the skull, maxilla, and mandible, tooth while surviving normal cells are able to and have been correlated with disease displacement, severe malocclusion, and form normal bone, thereby limiting the severity (Semler et al., 2010). Additional facial disfigurement (Akintoye et al., 2003, progression of FD lesions (Kuznetsov clinical manifestations include blue 2013) (Figs. 2G-2I). When associated et al., 2008).
Recommended publications
  • Differential Diagnosis: Brittle Bone Conditions Other Than OI
    Facts about Osteogenesis Imperfecta Differential Diagnosis: Brittle Bone Conditions Other than OI Fragile bones are the hallmark feature of osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). The mutations that cause OI lead to abnormalities within bone that result in increased bone turnover; reduced bone mineral content and decreased bone mineral density. The consequence of these changes is brittle bones that fracture easily. But not all cases of brittle bones are OI. Other causes of brittle bones include osteomalacia, disuse osteoporosis, disorders of increased bone density, defects of bone, and tumors. The following is a list of conditions that share fragile or brittle bones as a distinguishing feature. Brief descriptions and sources for further information are included. Bruck Syndrome This autosomal recessive disorder is also referred to as OI with contractures. Some people now consider this to be a type of OI. National Library of Medicine Genetics Home Reference: http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) Joint hyperextensibility with fractures; this is a variable disorder caused by several gene mutations. Ehlers-Danlos National Foundation http://www.ednf.org Fibrous Dysplasia Fibrous tissue develops in place of normal bone. This weakens the affected bone and causes it to deform or fracture. Fibrous Dysplasia Foundation: https://www.fibrousdysplasia.org ‎ Hypophosphatasia This autosomal recessive disorder affects the development of bones and teeth through defects in skeletal mineralization. Soft Bones: www.softbones.org; National Library of Medicine Genetics Home Reference: http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition Idiopathic Juvenile Osteoporosis A non-hereditary transient form of childhood osteoporosis that is similar to mild OI (Type I) National Osteoporosis Foundation: www.nof.org McCune-Albright Syndrome This disorder affects the bones, skin, and several hormone-producing tissues.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Causes and Underlying Disease Mechanisms in Early-Onset Osteoporosis
    From DEPARTMENT OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE AND SURGERY Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden GENETIC CAUSES AND UNDERLYING DISEASE MECHANISMS IN EARLY-ONSET OSTEOPOROSIS ANDERS KÄMPE Stockholm 2020 All previously published papers were reproduced with permission from the publisher. Published by Karolinska Institutet. Printed by Eprint AB 2020 © Anders Kämpe, 2020 ISBN 978-91-7831-759-2 Genetic causes and underlying disease mechanisms in early-onset osteoporosis THESIS FOR DOCTORAL DEGREE (Ph.D.) By Anders Kämpe Principal Supervisor: Opponent: Professor Outi Mäkitie Professor André Uitterlinden Karolinska Institutet Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery Department of Internal Medicine Laboratories Genetic Laboratory / Human Genomics Facility (HuGe-F) Co-supervisor(s): Examination Board: Associate Professor Anna Lindstrand Professor Marie-Louise Bondeson Karolinska Institutet Uppsala University Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology Associate Professor Giedre Grigelioniene Professor Göran Andersson Karolinska Institutet Karolinska Institutet Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery Department of Laboratory Medicine Professor Ann Nordgren Minna Pöyhönen Karolinska Institutet University of Helsinki Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery Department of Medical Genetics Associate Professor Hong Jiao Karolinska Institutet Department of Biosciences and Nutrition ABSTRACT Adult-onset osteoporosis is a disorder that affects a significant proportion of the elderly population worldwide and entails a substantial disease burden for the affected individuals. Childhood-onset osteoporosis is a rare condition often associating with a severe bone disease and recurrent fractures already in early childhood. Both childhood-onset and adult-onset osteoporosis have a large genetic component, but in children the disorder is usually genetically less complex and often caused by a single gene variant.
    [Show full text]
  • Skeletal Dysplasias
    Skeletal Dysplasias North Carolina Ultrasound Society Keisha L.B. Reddick, MD Wilmington Maternal Fetal Medicine Development of the Skeleton • 6 weeks – vertebrae • 7 weeks – skull • 8 wk – clavicle and mandible – Hyaline cartilage • Ossification – 7-12 wk – diaphysis appears – 12-16 wk metacarpals and metatarsals – 20+ wk pubis, calus, calcaneus • Visualization of epiphyseal ossification centers Epidemiology • Overall 9.1 per 1000 • Lethal 1.1 per 10,000 – Thanatophoric 1/40,000 – Osteogenesis Imperfecta 0.18 /10,000 – Campomelic 0.1 /0,000 – Achondrogenesis 0.1 /10,000 • Non-lethal – Achondroplasia 15 in 10,000 Most Common Skeletal Dysplasia • Thantophoric dysplasia 29% • Achondroplasia 15% • Osteogenesis imperfecta 14% • Achondrogenesis 9% • Campomelic dysplasia 2% Definition/Terms • Rhizomelia – proximal segment • Mezomelia –intermediate segment • Acromelia – distal segment • Micromelia – all segments • Campomelia – bowing of long bones • Preaxial – radial/thumb or tibial side • Postaxial – ulnar/little finger or fibular Long Bone Segments Counseling • Serial ultrasound • Genetic counseling • Genetic testing – Amniocentesis • Postnatal – Delivery center – Radiographs Assessment • Which segment is affected • Assessment of distal extremities • Any curvatures, fracture or clubbing noted • Are metaphyseal changes present • Hypoplastic or absent bones • Assessment of the spinal canal • Assessment of thorax. Skeletal Dysplasia Lethal Non-lethal • Thanatophoric • Achondroplasia • OI type II • OI type I, III, IV • Achondrogenesis • Hypochondroplasia
    [Show full text]
  • Fetal Skeletal Dysplasias
    There’s a Short Long Bone, What Now? Fetal Skeletal Dysplasias TERRY HARPER, MD DIVISION CHIEF CLINICAL ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR MATERNAL FETAL MEDICINE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO Over 450 types of Skeletal Dysplasias X-linked Spondyloepiphyseal Tarda Thanatophoric dysplasia Osteogenesis Imperfecta Hypochondrogenesis Achondrogenesis Achondroplasia Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia Fibrochondrogenesis (OSMED) Hypochondroplasia Campomelic dysplasia Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia congenita (SEDC) How will we come across this diagnosis? Third trimester size less than dates ultrasound at 33 4/7 weeks shows: What should our goal be at the initial visit? A. Genetic definitive diagnosis B. Termination of pregnancy C. Detailed anatomic survey including all long bones D. Assessment of likely lethality from pulmonary hypoplasia E. Amniocentesis or Serum Testing/Genetics Referral F. Referral to a Fetal Care Center What should our goal be at the initial visit? A. Genetic definitive diagnosis B. Termination of pregnancy C. Detailed anatomic survey including all long bones D. Assessment of likely lethality secondary to pulmonary hypoplasia E. Amniocentesis or Serum Testing/Genetics Referral F. Referral to a Fetal Care Center Detailed Ultrasound Technique Long bones Thorax Hands/feet Skull Spine Face Long bones Measure all including distal Look for missing bones Mineralization, curvature, fractures If limbs disproportional…. Does the abnormality effect: Proximal (rhizomelic) Middle (mesomelic) Distal (acromelic) Long bones Measure all extremities
    [Show full text]
  • Current Overview of Osteogenesis Imperfecta
    medicina Review Current Overview of Osteogenesis Imperfecta Mari Deguchi *, Shunichiro Tsuji , Daisuke Katsura , Kyoko Kasahara, Fuminori Kimura and Takashi Murakami Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu 520-2192, Shiga, Japan; [email protected] (S.T.); [email protected] (D.K.); [email protected] (K.K.); [email protected] (F.K.); [email protected] (T.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), or brittle bone disease, is a heterogeneous disorder charac- terised by bone fragility, multiple fractures, bone deformity, and short stature. OI is a heterogeneous disorder primarily caused by mutations in the genes involved in the production of type 1 collagen. Severe OI is perinatally lethal, while mild OI can sometimes not be recognised until adulthood. Severe or lethal OI can usually be diagnosed using antenatal ultrasound and confirmed by various imaging modalities and genetic testing. The combination of imaging parameters obtained by ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resource imaging (MRI) can not only detect OI accurately but also predict lethality before birth. Moreover, genetic testing, either noninvasive or invasive, can further confirm the diagnosis prenatally. Early and precise diagnoses provide parents with more time to decide on reproductive options. The currently available postnatal treatments for OI are not curative, and individuals with severe OI suffer multiple fractures and bone deformities throughout their lives. In utero mesenchymal stem cell transplantation has been drawing attention as a promising therapy for severe OI, and a clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of cell therapy is currently ongoing.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms of Bone Fragility: from Osteogenesis Imperfecta to Secondary Osteoporosis
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Mechanisms of Bone Fragility: From Osteogenesis Imperfecta to Secondary Osteoporosis Ahmed El-Gazzar and Wolfgang Högler * Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Krankenhausstraße 26-30, 4020 Linz, Austria; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +43-(0)5-7680-84-22001; Fax: +43-(0)5-7680-84-22004 Abstract: Bone material strength is determined by several factors, such as bone mass, matrix composi- tion, mineralization, architecture and shape. From a clinical perspective, bone fragility is classified as primary (i.e., genetic and rare) or secondary (i.e., acquired and common) osteoporosis. Understanding the mechanism of rare genetic bone fragility disorders not only advances medical knowledge on rare diseases, it may open doors for drug development for more common disorders (i.e., postmenopausal osteoporosis). In this review, we highlight the main disease mechanisms underlying the development of human bone fragility associated with low bone mass known to date. The pathways we focus on are type I collagen processing, WNT-signaling, TGF-ß signaling, the RANKL-RANK system and the osteocyte mechanosensing pathway. We demonstrate how the discovery of most of these pathways has led to targeted, pathway-specific treatments. Keywords: bone fragility; type I collagen; post-translational modifications; extracellular matrix; osteogenesis imperfecta; Juvenile Paget disease; osteomalacia; osteopetrosis 1. Introduction Citation: El-Gazzar, A.; Högler, W. Mechanisms of Bone Fragility: From Developing bones consist of cartilaginous joints, the epiphysis, the growth plate carti- Osteogenesis Imperfecta to Secondary lage with adjacent osteogenesis and the cortical and cancellous bone mineralized structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Abuse Or Osteogenesis Imperfecta?
    Child Abuse or Osteogenesis Imperfecta? A child is brought into the emergency room with a fractured leg. The parents are unable to explain how the leg fractured. X-rays reveal several other fractures in various stages of healing. The parents say they did not know about these fractures, and cannot explain what might have caused them. Hospital personnel call child welfare services to report a suspected case of child abuse. The child is taken away from the parents and placed in foster care. Scenes like this occur in emergency rooms every day. But in this case, the cause of the fractures is not child abuse. It is osteogenesis imperfecta, or OI. OI is a genetic disorder characterized by bones that break easily— often from little or no apparent cause. A person with OI may sustain just a few or as many as several hundred fractures in a lifetime. What Is Osteogenesis Imperfecta? Osteogenesis imperfecta is a genetic disorder. Most cases involve a defect in type 1 collagen—the protein “scaffolding” of bone and other connective tissues. People with OI have a faulty gene that instructs their bodies to make either too little type 1 collagen or poor quality type 1 collagen. The result is bones that break easily plus other connective tissue symptoms. Most cases of OI are caused by a dominant genetic defect. Most children with OI inherit the disorder from a parent who has OI. Some adults with very mild OI may not have been diagnosed as children. Approximately 25% of children with OI are born into a family with no history of the disorder.
    [Show full text]
  • Osteogenesis Imperfecta
    Osteogenesis imperfecta Description Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a group of genetic disorders that mainly affect the bones. The term "osteogenesis imperfecta" means imperfect bone formation. People with this condition have bones that break (fracture) easily, often from mild trauma or with no apparent cause. Multiple fractures are common, and in severe cases, can occur even before birth. Milder cases may involve only a few fractures over a person's lifetime. There are at least 19 recognized forms of osteogenesis imperfecta, designated type I through type XIX. Several types are distinguished by their signs and symptoms, although their characteristic features overlap. Increasingly, genetic causes are used to define rarer forms of osteogenesis imperfecta. Type I (also known as classic non- deforming osteogenesis imperfecta with blue sclerae) is the mildest form of osteogenesis imperfecta. Type II (also known as perinatally lethal osteogenesis imperfecta) is the most severe. Other types of this condition, including types III ( progressively deforming osteogenesis imperfecta) and IV (common variable osteogenesis imperfecta with normal sclerae), have signs and symptoms that fall somewhere between these two extremes. The milder forms of osteogenesis imperfecta, including type I, are characterized by bone fractures during childhood and adolescence that often result from minor trauma, such as falling while learning to walk. Fractures occur less frequently in adulthood. People with mild forms of the condition typically have a blue or grey tint to the part of the eye that is usually white (the sclera), and about half develop hearing loss in adulthood. Unlike more severely affected individuals, people with type I are usually of normal or near normal height.
    [Show full text]
  • Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Recent Findings Shed New Light on This Once Well-Understood Condition Donald Basel, Bsc, Mbbch1, and Robert D
    COLLABORATIVE REVIEW Genetics in Medicine Osteogenesis imperfecta: Recent findings shed new light on this once well-understood condition Donald Basel, BSc, MBBCh1, and Robert D. Steiner, MD2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview ...........................................................................................................375 Differential diagnosis...................................................................................380 Clinical manifestations ................................................................................376 In utero..........................................................................................................380 OI type I ....................................................................................................376 Infancy and childhood................................................................................380 OI type II ...................................................................................................377 Nonaccidental trauma (child abuse) ....................................................380 OI type III ..................................................................................................377 Infantile hypophosphatasia ....................................................................380 OI type IV..................................................................................................377 Bruck syndrome .......................................................................................380 Newly described types of OI .....................................................................377
    [Show full text]
  • Subbarao K Skeletal Dysplasia (Non - Sclerosing Dysplasias – Part II)
    REVIEW ARTICLE Skeletal Dysplasia (Non - Sclerosing dysplasias – Part II) Subbarao K Padmasri Awardee Prof. Dr. Kakarla Subbarao, Hyderabad, India Introduction Out of 70 dwarfism syndromes, the most In continuation with Sclerosing Dysplasias common form of dwarfism is (Part I), non sclerosing dysplasias constitute achondroplasia. It is a proportionate a major group of skeletal lesions including dwarfism and is rhizomelic in 70% of the dwarfism syndromes. The following list patients. It is autosomal dominant. There is includes most of the common dysplasias rhizomelic type of short limbs with increased either involving epiphysis, metaphysis, spinal curvature. Skull abnormalities are also diaphysis or epimetaphysis. These include noted. The radiographic features are multiple epiphyseal dysplasia, spondylo- mentioned in Table I. epiphyseal dysplasia, metaphyseal dysplasia, spondylometaphyseal dysplasia and Table I: Achondroplasia- Radiographic epimetaphyseal dysplasia (Hindigodu features Syndrome). These are included in dwarfism Large skull with prominent frontal syndromes. bones and a narrow base. The interpedicular distance decreases Dwarfism indicates a short person in stature caudally in lumbar region but with due to genetic or acquired causes. It is normal vertebral height. defined as an adult height of less than Posterior scalloping 147 cm (4 feet 10 inches). The pelvis is square with small sciatic notches and the inlet The average height of Indians is men- 5ft 3 configuration with classical ½ inches and women–5 ft 0 inches much less champagne glass appearance than average American or Chinese people. Trident hands Delayed appearance of carpal bones Dwarfism syndromes consist of 200 distinct Dumb bell shaped limb bones medical entities. In Proportionate Dwarfism, the body appears normally proportioned, but is unusually small.
    [Show full text]
  • Prenatal Diagnosis, Management and Outcomes of Skeletal Dysplasia
    logy & Ob o st ec e tr n i Alouini et al., Gynecol Obstet (Sunnyvale) 2019, y c s G 9:4 Gynecology & Obstetrics ISSN: 2161-0932 Research Article Open Access Prenatal Diagnosis, Management and Outcomes of Skeletal Dysplasia Souhail Alouini1*, Jean Gabriel Martin1, Pascal Megier1 and Olga Esperandieu2 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal-Foetal Medicine Unit Regional Hospital Center of Orleans, 45000, Orléans, France 2Department of Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Regional Hospital Center Of Orleans, 45000, Orléans, France *Corresponding author: Souhail Alouini, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Surgery, Regional Hospital Center of Orleans, 14 Avenue de l’hospital, Orleans, 45100, France, Tel: +33688395759; E-mail: [email protected] Received date: March 02, 2019; Accepted date: May 02, 2019; Published date: May 09, 2019 Copyright: © 2019 Alouini S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract Objective: To evaluate prenatal ultrasound findings of Skeletal Dysplasia (SD) and examine the contribution of radiological, histological and genetic exams. Methods: Retrospective study including all cases of SD managed in a tertiary maternity center between 1996 and 2010. Results: Eight cases of SD were diagnosed (1.4/10,000 births) by ultrasonography (USE). Three (38%) cases of SD were discovered in the first trimester, and five in the second trimester. We found short femurs in all cases. Anomalies consisted of the thickness of the femoral diaphysis, broad epiphysis, short and squat long bones, costal fractures, thinned coasts, anomalies of the profile and vertebrae, and a short and narrow thorax.
    [Show full text]
  • Anesthesia for a Patient with Osteogenesis Imperfecta, Achondroplastic Dwarfism and History of Malignant Hyperthermia
    anesthesia for a Patient with osteogenesis imPerfecta, achondroPlastic dwarfism and history of malignant hyPerthermia Jaclyn Harvey SRNA AbstrAct A primary goal for anesthesia providers is to maintain patient safety. This is an even greater concern when taking care of a patient with a complicated medical history. This case report, discusses the care of a 47 year-old female patient who presented to a tertiary care center for an orthopedic procedure. Her medical history included osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), achondro- plastic dwarfism and suspicion of malignant hyperthermia (MH). There were multiple anesthetic implications to ensure safety for this patient during the perioperative period. OI concerns include bone fragility and potential for multiple fractures even after inoffensive trauma. Achondroplastic dwarfism concerns include abnormalities of the upper airway and difficulty with visual- izing the glottic opening during direct laryngoscopy.1 Malignant Hyperthermia is a life threatening disorder, which places the patient at risk for a hypermetabolic reaction if exposed to select anesthetic agents. IntroductIon: Patients with osteogenesis imperfect (OI) are placed at high risk during anesthesia for both physiological and anatomical reasons. Complications include osteoporosis, joint laxity, and tendon weakness.2 Pulmonary compromise may also occur if the patient displays thoracic distortion. These patients have an elevated basal metabolic rate that causes an increase in core body temper- ature and can mistaken to be MH. No consistent evidence has shown that OI is always associated with MH.2 Achondroplastic dwarfism is the most common form of dwarfism occurring at the rate of 1:30,000 live births. Airway abnormalities such as macroglossia, micrognathia, small oral opening and temporo- mandibular joint immobility can make mask ventilation and intubation challenging for anesthesia providers.
    [Show full text]