Teluk Rubiah Maritime Terminal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Teluk Rubiah Maritime Terminal TELUK RUBIAH MARITIME TERMINAL Summary of information on Major Import Wharf (MIW) Distance of Trestle 2116 M (Main Access Trestle : 1894 M & Transfer Platform : 222 M) from shore Width of Trestle 4.080 M Length MIW 510 meter Width of MIW 35 m Maximum Vessel 362 meter (Valemax) Length projected Minimum Vessel 234.36 (Capesize) Length projected Expected Type of Valemax & Capesize Vessel Major Import Wharf (MIW) TELUK RUBIAH MARITIME TERMINAL TELUK RUBIAH MARITIME TERMINAL Quick Release Hook Arrangement at Main Import Wharf Green Color Quick Release Hook White Color No Quick Release Hook Number of QRH 21 (all double hook) QRH SWL 100 ton per Hook QRH opening 90°opening, 45° turning inside Distance between 15 meter for QRH (J19 till J25 & J41 till J47), 30 meter for QRH (J27 till QRH J39) TELUK RUBIAH MARITIME TERMINAL Type of Fender Cell Fender Cell Fender Diagram n Dimension (unit in mm) SCK 2250H E0.9 Projection for QRH 12 QRH (24 lines) use for Valemax Distance between Fender to QRH 2.5 m 6.15 meter TELUK RUBIAH MARITIME TERMINAL Maximum Berthing Velocity 0.2 knots Maximum Allowable 200kn/m₂ Hull Pressure TELUK RUBIAH MARITIME TERMINAL Ship Unloader Specification 1. SHIP UNLOADER INFORMATION CAPACITY A Total lifting capacity 73 t 73T B Grab dead weight 26T C Grab load capacity 47T 2. CAPACITY (per grab) A Rated capacity 2900 t/h B Maximum capacity 3500 t/h C Average capacity 1400 t/h D Time per cycle (optimum) 43.8s E Number of cycle per hour 82.2 c/hr 3. CONDITION LIMITATIONS A STOP all loading operation 30knots B All unloading operation SECURED and 35knots LOCKED C Vessel required to CAST OFF 40knots D Maximum operation wind force 250 N/m2 4. MAIN DIMENSIONS A *Maximum outreach of the grab(from centre of 50 m seaside rail) B *Lifting height above the unloader rail track 29 m C *Lifting height below the unloader rail track 30 m D *Total lifting height 59 m E *Boom Height 40 m F *Unloader Maximum Height 70 m G *Unloader Crane Boom width 10 m H *Length of the Unloader from Rail to Rail 35 m I *Width of the Unloader 25.7 m *Refer to the diagram below TELUK RUBIAH MARITIME TERMINAL Diagram showing Unloader Crane Dimension from Cross Section View (unit in mm) TELUK RUBIAH MARITIME TERMINAL Diagram showing Unloader Crane from Cross Section View with Dimension (unit in mm) TELUK RUBIAH MARITIME TERMINAL Unloader Crane Boom Diagram showing Unloader Crane from Top View with Dimension TELUK RUBIAH MARITIME TERMINAL Diagram top view of double hook Quick Release Hook with dimension Unit in mm Diagram of the Quick Release Hook TELUK RUBIAH MARITIME TERMINAL HOOK DATA HOOK SAFE WORKING LOAD 1000kN HOOK PROOF LOAD 1500kN COMBINED MOORING BASE LOAD 2000kN CAPSTAN PERFORMANCE DATA CAPSTAN RUNNING LINE PULL 1000Kg CAPSTAN HAULING SPEED 25m/min CAPSTAN HEAD DIAMETER 275 mm MOTOR CAPACITY 5.5 kW MAXIMUM POWER CONSUMPTION 7.3 kVA ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY 400/3/50 AREA CLASSIFICATION NON ATEX Quick Release Hook Unit (Double Hook) VLOC at LAT- condition fully loaded and arrival draft 22m. Freeboard at 8.00m VLOC at LAT- condition fully loaded and arrival draft 22m. Vessel main deck 2m below Wharf level wharf Freeboard at 8.00m Height of wharf 10.00m Remarks: Distance between wharf deck to vessel deck is 2.00m VLOC at LAT- condition fully loaded and arrival draft 22m. Distance between QRH platfrom to vessel hull 2.5m Summary of information on Minor Export Wharf (MEW) 2116 m Distance of Trestle from shore (Main Access Trestle : 1894 m & Transfer Platform : 222 m) Width of Trestle 4.080 m Length MEW 555 m Width of MEW (rail to rail) 12.5 m Maximum Depth of MEW 22 m Maximum Vessel Air Draft 17.75 m (from HAT to end luffing boom) Maximum Vessel Length projected 320 m (Capsize) Minimum Vessel Length projected < 150 m (Barge) Maximum allowable sailing draft 19m Maximum allowable breadth 54m Maximum allowable deadweight 220,000 Mt Expected Type of Vessel Capsize, Panamax, Handymax Length of Loader Maximum 36.85m Outreach MINOR IMPORT WHARF TUG WHARF Total : 12 QRH Number of QRH Double Hooks : 10 units Triple Hooks : 2 units QRH SWL 100 ton per Hook QRH opening 90°opening, 45° turning inside Double Hooks : Triple Hooks : Platform E4,E5,E6,E12, Platform E3 & E28 (2 units) Location of the QRH E15,E16,E19, E25,E26,E27 (10units) Vertical limitation 45 degree angle of QRH Horizontal Limitation 45 degree angle of QRH Number of Bollard 26 units Bollard SWL 150 tons Platform E1,E2,E7 Till E11,E13,E14,E17,E18, Location of Bollard E20 Till E24,E29 Till E38 Capesize vessel (320mtrs) projected Quick Release Hook (Triple & Double Hooks) and Bollard Arrangement at Main Import Wharf Blue Color Platform Install with Triple Quick Release Hooks Green Color Platform Install with Double Quick Release Hooks White Color Platform installed with Bollard Cone Fender Dimension: (Unit in mm, kg) Type of Fender SCN 1400 Cell Fender Dimension (Unit in mm, kg) SCK 2250H Handymax Capesize (320 m) Panamax (250 m) (190 m) 4 Headline,3 Formation of 4 Headline,4 Fwd 4 Headline,3 Fwd Fwd Breast, Lines for Vessel at MEW Breast, 4 Fwd Breast, 3 Fwd 3 Fwd Spring, 4 Aft Spring, Spring, 3 Aft Spring, Spring, 3 Aft 4 Aft Breast, 4 3 Aft Breast, 4 Spring, 3 Aft Sternline Sternline Breast, 4 Sternline Distance between Fender to Wharf Deck. Distance Between 15 m Platform Maximum Berthing Velocity 0.2 knots Maximum Allowable Hull 200kn/m₂ Pressure Maximum Design 6⁰ Berthing Angle Ship Loader Specification SHIP LOADER INFORMATION CAPACITY Maximum Capacity 8000 t without Chute Guaranteed Capacity 2000 t with chute Rail Span 12.5 m Wheel Base 18 m Maximum Slewing Radius 48 m Minimum Slewing Radius 29.5 m Outreach of Loader From Seaside Rail 23.25 m Shuttling Distance (Maximum Outreach) + 18.5 m Shuttling Speed 0~6 m/min Luffing Angel -12~+10⁰ Luffing Speed 5.76 r/min Slewing Angel -83⁰~+83⁰ Slewing Speed 0.0~0.1 r/min Travelling Speed 0~30 m/min Maximum Wheel Load <380 kN Belt Width 1.8 m Belt Speed 4.6 m/s CONDITION LIMITATIONS STOP all loading operation 30 kts All unloading operation SECURED and 35 kts LOCKED Vessel required to CAST OFF 40 kts MAIN DIMENSIONS *Loader Maximum Height 35.2 m *Loader Width (from rail to rail) 12.5 m *Length of the Loader from Rail to Rail 30.34 m Diagram of the Loader Crane Diagram showing The Loader Crane from side view with dimension (All dimension in mm) Diagram of the Loader from Front view (All dimension in mm) Quick Release Hook Diagram in mm Top View of Triple Quick Release Hook Bollard installed at Minor Export Wharf (MEW) Diagram of Bollard from front view Diagram of Bollard from Side View Diagram of Bollard from Top View Example of Bollard at MEW (All dimension in mm) *Safe working Load : 150 tones /1473.15 kNm Capesize at LAT- Vessel condition fully ballast and arrival draft 10m. Capesize at LAT- Vessel condition fully ballast and arrival draft 10m. Capesize at LAT- Vessel condition fully ballast and arrival draft 10m. Summary of information on Minor Export Wharf (MEW) 2116 m Distance of Trestle from shore (Main Access Trestle : 1894 m & Transfer Platform : 222 m) Width of Trestle 4.080 m Length MEW 555 m Width of MEW (rail to rail) 12.5 m Maximum Depth of MEW 22 m Maximum Vessel Air Draft 17.75 m (from HAT to end luffing boom) Maximum Vessel Length projected 320 m (Capsize) Minimum Vessel Length projected < 150 m (Barge) Maximum allowable sailing draft 19m Maximum allowable breadth 54m Maximum allowable deadweight 220,000 Mt Expected Type of Vessel Capsize, Panamax, Handymax Length of Loader Maximum 36.85m Outreach MINOR IMPORT WHARF TUG WHARF Total : 12 QRH Number of QRH Double Hooks : 10 units Triple Hooks : 2 units QRH SWL 100 ton per Hook QRH opening 90°opening, 45° turning inside Double Hooks : Triple Hooks : Platform E4,E5,E6,E12, Platform E3 & E28 (2 units) Location of the QRH E15,E16,E19, E25,E26,E27 (10units) Vertical limitation 45 degree angle of QRH Horizontal Limitation 45 degree angle of QRH Number of Bollard 26 units Bollard SWL 150 tons Platform E1,E2,E7 Till E11,E13,E14,E17,E18, Location of Bollard E20 Till E24,E29 Till E38 Capesize vessel (320mtrs) projected Quick Release Hook (Triple & Double Hooks) and Bollard Arrangement at Main Import Wharf Blue Color Platform Install with Triple Quick Release Hooks Green Color Platform Install with Double Quick Release Hooks White Color Platform installed with Bollard Cone Fender Dimension: (Unit in mm, kg) Type of Fender SCN 1400 Cell Fender Dimension (Unit in mm, kg) SCK 2250H Handymax Capesize (320 m) Panamax (250 m) (190 m) 4 Headline,3 Formation of 4 Headline,4 Fwd 4 Headline,3 Fwd Fwd Breast, Lines for Vessel at MEW Breast, 4 Fwd Breast, 3 Fwd 3 Fwd Spring, 4 Aft Spring, Spring, 3 Aft Spring, Spring, 3 Aft 4 Aft Breast, 4 3 Aft Breast, 4 Spring, 3 Aft Sternline Sternline Breast, 4 Sternline Distance between Fender to Wharf Deck. Distance Between 15 m Platform Maximum Berthing Velocity 0.2 knots Maximum Allowable Hull 200kn/m₂ Pressure Maximum Design 6⁰ Berthing Angle Ship Loader Specification SHIP LOADER INFORMATION CAPACITY Maximum Capacity 8000 t without Chute Guaranteed Capacity 2000 t with chute Rail Span 12.5 m Wheel Base 18 m Maximum Slewing Radius 48 m Minimum Slewing Radius 29.5 m Outreach of Loader From Seaside Rail 23.25 m Shuttling Distance (Maximum Outreach) + 18.5 m Shuttling Speed 0~6 m/min Luffing Angel -12~+10⁰ Luffing Speed 5.76 r/min Slewing Angel -83⁰~+83⁰ Slewing Speed 0.0~0.1 r/min Travelling Speed 0~30 m/min Maximum Wheel Load <380 kN Belt Width 1.8 m Belt Speed 4.6 m/s CONDITION LIMITATIONS STOP all loading operation 30 kts All unloading operation SECURED and 35 kts LOCKED
Recommended publications
  • Glossary of Nautical Terms: English – Japanese
    Glossary of Nautical Terms: English – Japanese 2 Approved and Released by: Dal Bailey, DIR-IdC United States Coast Guard Auxiliary Interpreter Corps http://icdept.cgaux.org/ 6/29/2012 3 Index Glossary of Nautical Terms: English ‐ Japanese A…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…..pages 4 ‐ 6 B……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……. pages 7 ‐ 18 C………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………...pages 19 ‐ 26 D……………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………………………..pages 27 ‐ 32 E……………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………….…………. pages 33 ‐ 35 F……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………….………..……pages 36 ‐ 41 G……………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………...…………pages 42 ‐ 43 H……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….….………………..pages 49 ‐ 48 I…………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………….……….……... pages 49 ‐ 50 J…………………………….……..…………………………………………………………………………………………….………... page 51 K…………………………………………………………………………………………………….….…………..………………………page 52 L…………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………………….……..pages 53 ‐ 58 M…………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………………....….. pages 59 ‐ 62 N……………….........................................................................…………………………………..…….. pages 63 ‐ 64 O……………………………………..........................................................................…………….…….. pages 65 ‐ 67 P……………………….............................................................................................................. pages 68 ‐ 74 Q………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………….……...…… page 75 R………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………….…………..
    [Show full text]
  • Vale: How to Improve Its Competitive Advantage to Export Iron Ore Via The
    Vale: How to improve its competitive advantage to export Iron Ore via the Brazilian Maritime Terminal of Ponta da Madeira, through the enhancement of its infrastructures and processes? Picture: Aerial view of the Ponta da Madeira Maritime Terminal, Vale 2005.1 Picture: Aerial view of the Maritime Terminal of Ponta da Madeira. Vale 2015 1. Bachelor Project submitted for the Bachelor of Science HES in Business Administration with a Major in International Management Erisvelton TAVARES Bachelor Project Advisor: Dr. Nicolas DEPETRIS, HES Professor Geneva, Aug 14th, 2015 Haute Ecole de Gestion de Genève (HEG-GE) International Business Administration Declaration This Bachelor Project is submitted as part of the final examination requirements of the Geneva School of Business Administration, for obtaining the Bachelor of Science HES-SO in Business Administration, with major in International Management. The student accepts the terms of the confidentiality agreement if one has been signed. The use of any conclusions or recommendations made in the Bachelor Project, with no prejudice to their value, engages neither the responsibility of the author, nor the adviser to the Bachelor Project, nor the jury members nor the HEG. “I attest that I have personally accomplished this work without using any sources other than those cited in the bibliography. Furthermore, I have sent the final version of this document for analysis by the plagiarism detection software URKUND using the address supplied by my adviser”. th Geneva, Aug 14 , 2015 Erisvelton TAVARES i Vale: How to improve its competitive advantage to export Iron Ore via the Brazilian Maritime Terminal of Ponta da Madeira, through the enhancement of its infrastructure and processes? TAVARES, Erisvelton Acknowledgements This Bachelor Project was made possible through the support of many people who contributed to make it real.
    [Show full text]
  • Branch's Elements of Shipping/Alan E
    ‘I would strongly recommend this book to anyone who is interested in shipping or taking a course where shipping is an important element, for example, chartering and broking, maritime transport, exporting and importing, ship management, and international trade. Using an approach of simple analysis and pragmatism, the book provides clear explanations of the basic elements of ship operations and commercial, legal, economic, technical, managerial, logistical, and financial aspects of shipping.’ Dr Jiangang Fei, National Centre for Ports & Shipping, Australian Maritime College, University of Tasmania, Australia ‘Branch’s Elements of Shipping provides the reader with the best all-round examination of the many elements of the international shipping industry. This edition serves as a fitting tribute to Alan Branch and is an essential text for anyone with an interest in global shipping.’ David Adkins, Lecturer in International Procurement and Supply Chain Management, Plymouth Graduate School of Management, Plymouth University ‘Combining the traditional with the modern is as much a challenge as illuminating operations without getting lost in the fascination of the technical detail. This is particularly true for the world of shipping! Branch’s Elements of Shipping is an ongoing example for mastering these challenges. With its clear maritime focus it provides a very comprehensive knowledge base for relevant terms and details and it is a useful source of expertise for students and practitioners in the field.’ Günter Prockl, Associate Professor, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark This page intentionally left blank Branch’s Elements of Shipping Since it was first published in 1964, Elements of Shipping has become established as a market leader.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Developments
    UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2012 Report by the UNCTAD secretariat Chapter 4 UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2012 PORT DEVELOPMENTS :RUOGFRQWDLQHUSRUWWKURXJKSXWLQFUHDVHGE\DQHVWLPDWHG}SHUFHQWWR}PLOOLRQ IRRWHTXLYDOHQWXQLWV 7(8V LQLWVKLJKHVWOHYHOHYHU7KLVLQFUHDVHZDVORZHU WKDQWKH}SHUFHQWLQFUHDVHRIWKDWZDVLWVHOIDVKDUSUHERXQGIURPWKHVOXPS of 2009. Chinese mainland ports maintained their share of total world container port WKURXJKSXWDW}SHUFHQW 7KH81&7$'/LQHU6KLSSLQJ&RQQHFWLYLW\,QGH[ /6&, VKRZHGDFRQWLQXDWLRQLQ of the trend towards larger ships deployed by a smaller number of companies. Between 2011 and 2012, the number of companies providing services per country went down E\ } SHU FHQW ZKLOH WKH DYHUDJH VL]H RI WKH ODUJHVW FRQWDLQHU VKLSV LQFUHDVHG E\ }SHUFHQW2QO\}SHUFHQWRIFRXQWU\SDLUVDUHVHUYHGE\GLUHFWOLQHUVKLSSLQJ connections; for the remaining country pairs at least one trans-shipment port is required. This chapter covers container port throughput, liner shipping connectivity and some of WKHPDMRUSRUWGHYHORSPHQWSURMHFWVXQGHUZD\LQGHYHORSLQJFRXQWULHV,WDOVRDVVHVVHV how recent trends in ship enlargement may impact ports. 80 REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2012 A. PORT THROUGHPUT HFRQRPLHV IRU LV HVWLPDWHG DW } SHU FHQW signifying a return to previous year-on-year growth Port throughput is usually measured in tons and by levels. Developing economies’ share of world FDUJR W\SH IRU H[DPSOH OLTXLG RU GU\ FDUJR /LTXLG throughput continues to remain virtually unchanged at cargo is usually measured in tons
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining China's Politics in the Arctic
    From ‘Great Wall’ to ‘Great White North’: Explaining China’s politics in the Arctic By Malte Humpert and Andreas Raspotnik 1 LONG POST 2012|08|17 Published by European Geostrategy http://europeangeostrategy.ideasoneurope.eu Over the past decade, the Arctic has moved into the focus of world politics.2 As Arctic sea ice melts at a rapid rate, regional and international actors are strengthening their local involvement thus further focusing international attention on the region. External Arctic actors, primarily the European Union and the People’s Republic of China, but potentially also India and South Korea, aim to profit from the region’s various prospects. Geopolitical dynamics in the Arctic include the political consequences of climate change in the region; the subsequent rise of economic opportunities; and the increase of interna- tional competition on one hand, and multilateral co-operation on the other. Against pre- vailing perceptions, geoeconomics only plays a subordinate role in China’s Arctic endeav- our. While the Arctic may hold significant economic potential, its riches will not feature prominently in China’s future economic calculations. Instead, the driving force of China’s interest in the region is based on geopolitical considerations, including enhancing its abil- ity to exert influence in the Arctic through regional strategic partnerships. China’s recent political and economic efforts in the region indicate that China regards partnerships with smaller Arctic states as not only key to gaining influence in the Arctic, but
    [Show full text]
  • Course Objectives Chapter 2 2. Hull Form and Geometry
    COURSE OBJECTIVES CHAPTER 2 2. HULL FORM AND GEOMETRY 1. Be familiar with ship classifications 2. Explain the difference between aerostatic, hydrostatic, and hydrodynamic support 3. Be familiar with the following types of marine vehicles: displacement ships, catamarans, planing vessels, hydrofoil, hovercraft, SWATH, and submarines 4. Learn Archimedes’ Principle in qualitative and mathematical form 5. Calculate problems using Archimedes’ Principle 6. Read, interpret, and relate the Body Plan, Half-Breadth Plan, and Sheer Plan and identify the lines for each plan 7. Relate the information in a ship's lines plan to a Table of Offsets 8. Be familiar with the following hull form terminology: a. After Perpendicular (AP), Forward Perpendiculars (FP), and midships, b. Length Between Perpendiculars (LPP or LBP) and Length Overall (LOA) c. Keel (K), Depth (D), Draft (T), Mean Draft (Tm), Freeboard and Beam (B) d. Flare, Tumble home and Camber e. Centerline, Baseline and Offset 9. Define and compare the relationship between “centroid” and “center of mass” 10. State the significance and physical location of the center of buoyancy (B) and center of flotation (F); locate these points using LCB, VCB, TCB, TCF, and LCF st 11. Use Simpson’s 1 Rule to calculate the following (given a Table of Offsets): a. Waterplane Area (Awp or WPA) b. Sectional Area (Asect) c. Submerged Volume (∇S) d. Longitudinal Center of Flotation (LCF) 12. Read and use a ship's Curves of Form to find hydrostatic properties and be knowledgeable about each of the properties on the Curves of Form 13. Calculate trim given Taft and Tfwd and understand its physical meaning i 2.1 Introduction to Ships and Naval Engineering Ships are the single most expensive product a nation produces for defense, commerce, research, or nearly any other function.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Mega-Ships
    The Impact of Mega-Ships Case-Specific Policy Analysis The Impact of Mega-Ships Case-Specific Policy Analysis INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT FORUM The International Transport Forum at the OECD is an intergovernmental organisation with 54 member countries. It acts as a strategic think tank with the objective of helping shape the transport policy agenda on a global level and ensuring that it contributes to economic growth, environmental protection, social inclusion and the preservation of human life and well-being. The International Transport Forum organises an Annual Summit of ministers along with leading representatives from industry, civil society and academia. The International Transport Forum was created under a Declaration issued by the Council of Ministers of the ECMT (European Conference of Ministers of Transport) at its Ministerial Session in May 2006 under the legal authority of the Protocol of the ECMT, signed in Brussels on 17 October 1953, and legal instruments of the OECD. The Members of the Forum are: Albania, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China (People’s Republic of), Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom and United States. The International Transport Forum’s Research Centre gathers statistics and conducts co-operative research programmes addressing all modes of transport. Its findings are widely disseminated and support policy making in Member countries as well as contributing to the Annual Summit.
    [Show full text]
  • PPCO Twist System
    DECEMBER 2012 VOL. 117 NO. 12 FEATURE ARTICLES FORESIGHT ENERGY/32 PRAIRIE STATE/38 28 China’s Deep Water Ports 32 Patton Rolls into Illinois The newest longwall mine in Foresight Energy’s fleet comes online 38 Clean Coal Strikes Back Prairie State and its adjacent underground mine begin generating reliable inexpensive power 44 New Technology Allows Mine Operators to Get Optimum Tire Performance Several tire manufacturers debut new systems and tires for ultra-class haul trucks MINING TIRES/44 PROXIMITY DETECTION/54 48 Silica and Respirable Content in Rock Dust Samples 54 Matrix, Alliance Resources and Preparing for New Proximity Regulations 60 Hot Dip Galvanized Steel Reduces Plant Maintenance Costs COAL IN THE NEWS 6 Southern Coal recalls and hires Appalachian miners 6 Peabody decides to close Willow Lake 6 Cloud Peak Energy sells Decker to Ambre Energy 7 Signal Peak lifts force majeure 10 Rhino plans new ILB operation 11 Court reviews Essar’s requests 14 THIS ISSUE Alliance sees markets improving 20 Japanese utilities to purchase U.S. coal from Oxbow 21 Federal Appeals Court upholds discrimination decision This month, Coal Age profiles Foresight Energy’s Deer Run 22 Midwest Generation faces possible bankruptcy longwall mine. On the cover, Deer Run longwall shearer 24 Coal transportation costs continue to climb operators Mike Ferrill (left) and Brian Hall. WORLD NEWS 7 VISA Steel & SunCoke Energy announce Indian joint venture Ship damages coal loading system at Westshore Terminals DEPARTMENTS 10 Bumi expects to retain business in Indonesia
    [Show full text]
  • Load Line Rules
    RUSSIAN MARITIME REGISTER OF SHIPPING LOAFORD SEA-GOIN LINE GRULE SHIPS S Saint-Petersburg Edition 2017 Load Line Rules for Sea-Going Ships of Russian Maritime Register of Shipping have been approved in accordance with the established approval procedure and come into force on 1 January 2017. The present twentieth edition of the Rules is based on the nineteenth edition of 2016 taking into account the additions and amendments developed immediately before publication. The unified requirements, interpretations and recommendations of the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) and the relevant resolutions of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) have been taken into consideration. The Rules are published in electronic format and hard copy in Russian and English. In case of discrepancies between the Russian and English versions, the Russian version shall prevail. ISBN 978-5-89331-352-9 © POCCHHCKHH MopcKofi peracTp CyHOXOflCTBa, 2017 As compared to the previous edition (2016), the twentieth edition contains the following amendments. LOAD LINE RULES FOR SEA-GOING SHIPS 1. Editorial amendments have been made. CONTENTS LOAD LINE RULES FOR SEA-GOING SHIPS 1 General 5 5 Special requirements for ships engaged in 1.1 Scope of application 5 international voyages which are assigned 1.2 Definitions and explanations 7 timber freeboards 43 1.3 Areas of navigation 10 5.1 Conditions of assignment of timber 1.4 Scope of survey and certificates 10 freeboards 43 1.5 General technical requirements 13 5.2 Calculation of minimum timber 2 Load line marking on ships engaged in freeboards 44 international voyages 14 6 Load lines of ships of 24 m in length and more 2.1 Deck line and load line mark 14 not engaged in international voyages 2.2 Lines to be used with load line mark.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 100 People Edition 6
    POR 0002 13JO AN REV CONTAINERISATION INGLES 210x297MM.pdf 1 16/11/15 10:19 CONTENTS THE RANKINGS TOP LISTS 04 Introduction 26 Top 10 box port operators 08 Numbers 1-10 45 Top 50 beneficial owners 28 Numbers 11-20 60 Top 10 brokers 44 Numbers 21-30 61 Top 50 owners by country 57 Numbers 31-40 71 Top 50 flags 69 Numbers 41-50 72 Top 10 insurers 84 Numbers 51-60 79 Top 10 regulators 94 Numbers 61-70 104 Top 10 classification societies 101 Numbers 71-80 115 Top 10 ship finance 111 Numbers 81-90 119 Top 10 lawyers 120 Numbers 91-100 Top 100 Editor Chief executive Printing Lloyd’s List is available online in every country Nicola Good Michael Dell St Ives plc in the world by placing a subscription with the publishers in London, Informa UK Ltd. Please Lloyd’s List Managing Editor Head of Marketing Services Editoral, advertising and place your order with the Lloyd’s List marketing Richard Meade Fergus Gregory sponsorship inquiries team at Informa. This special supplement is Lloyd’s List, Christchurch Court, 10-15 Lloyd’s List Asia Editor-in-Chief Head of Sales – Marketing Services issued free to subscribers. Newgate Street, London, EC1A 7AZ Tom Leander David O’Neill Tel: +44 (0)20 7017 5000 For further information please email: Lloyd’s List Deputy Editor Marketing Services Sales Fax: +44 (0)20 7017 4782 [email protected] Craig Eason Janet Wood (Greece & Cyprus) Email: [email protected] or telephone: +44 (0)20 3377 3792 Linsey Dinesan-Rajan (The Americas) Lloyd’s Digital Content Manager Published by Informa UK Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Extreme Waves and Ship Design
    10th International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures Houston, Texas, United States of America © 2007 American Bureau of Shipping Extreme Waves and Ship Design Craig B. Smith Dockside Consultants, Inc. Balboa, California, USA Abstract Introduction Recent research has demonstrated that extreme waves, Recent research by the European Community has waves with crest to trough heights of 20 to 30 meters, demonstrated that extreme waves—waves with crest to occur more frequently than previously thought. Also, trough heights of 20 to 30 meters—occur more over the past several decades, a surprising number of frequently than previously thought (MaxWave Project, large commercial vessels have been lost in incidents 2003). In addition, over the past several decades, a involving extreme waves. Many of the victims were surprising number of large commercial vessels have bulk carriers. Current design criteria generally consider been lost in incidents involving extreme waves. Many significant wave heights less than 11 meters (36 feet). of the victims were bulk carriers that broke up so Based on what is known today, this criterion is quickly that they sank before a distress message could inadequate and consideration should be given to be sent or the crew could be rescued. designing for significant wave heights of 20 meters (65 feet), meanwhile recognizing that waves 30 meters (98 There also have been a number of widely publicized feet) high are not out of the question. The dynamic force events where passenger liners encountered large waves of wave impacts should also be included in the (20 meters or higher) that caused damage, injured structural analysis of the vessel, hatch covers and other passengers and crew members, but did not lead to loss vulnerable areas (as opposed to relying on static or of the vessel.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Maritime Transport 2012
    UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2012 UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2012 New York and Geneva, 2012 ii REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2012 NOTE The Review of Maritime Transport is a recurrent publication prepared by the UNCTAD secretariat since 1968 with the aim of fostering the transparency of maritime markets and analysing relevant developments. Any factual or editorial corrections that may prove QHFHVVDU\EDVHGRQFRPPHQWVPDGHE\*RYHUQPHQWVZLOOEHUHƅHFWHGLQDFRUULJHQGXPWREHLVVXHGVXEVHTXHQWO\ * * * 6\PEROVRI8QLWHG1DWLRQVGRFXPHQWVDUHFRPSRVHGRIFDSLWDOOHWWHUVFRPELQHGZLWKƄJXUHV8VHRIVXFKDV\PEROLQGLFDWHVD reference to a United Nations document. * * * The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. * * * 0DWHULDOLQWKLVSXEOLFDWLRQPD\EHIUHHO\TXRWHGRUUHSULQWHGEXWDFNQRZOHGJHPHQWLVUHTXHVWHGZLWKUHIHUHQFHWRWKHGRFXPHQW QXPEHU VHHEHORZ $FRS\RIWKHSXEOLFDWLRQFRQWDLQLQJWKHTXRWDWLRQRUUHSULQWVKRXOGEHVHQWWRWKH81&7$'VHFUHWDULDWDWWKH following address: Palais des Nations, CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland. UNCTAD/RMT/2012 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales no. E.12.II.D.17 ISBN 978-92-1-112860-4 e-ISBN 978-92-1-055950-8 ISSN 0566-7682 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Review of Maritime Transport
    [Show full text]