DOCSLIB.ORG

Conservative and Unionist Group Response

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conservative and Unionist Group Response 2017 Kingston-Upon-Hull Local Government Boundary Review Conservative and Unionist Group Response Conservative and Unionist Group Submission March 2017 INTRODUCTION The Conservative Group welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Local Government Boundary Commission’s (LGBCE hereafter) proposals. We may also spend some time commenting on other proposals put forward by other political groups, but feel the main thrust of our remarks on the consultation should be around the LGBCE proposals. Our commentary, like our initial proposals, is based around adherence to the three main tenets of the LGBCE as highlighted on their website:- “The aim of the electoral review is to recommend ward boundaries that mean each councillor represents approximately the same number of voters. We also aim to ensure that the pattern of wards reflects the interests and identities of local communities as well as promoting effective local government.”1 To further highlight the key criteria for drawing up wards which we will refer back to throughout this submission document, they are to: 1 ensure each councillor represents approximately the same number of voters 2 ensure that the pattern of wards reflects the interests and identities of local communities 3 promote effective local government We have also adhered, as far as possible, to our belief that railway lines and dual carriageways are major constraints on identifying a community. Traditionally, canals and rivers are also seen as natural barriers and we feel we need to turn a little to the subject of the river – a topic that greatly exercises the minds of Hullensians. In cities such as York, Dublin, Belfast, and London the rivers are substantial and although the Ouse and Thames are crossed frequently by major bridges it is still a considerable barrier to traverse. On rivers such as the Tyne, also exuberantly spanned by several iconic bridges, they have even been a barrier in that neither Newcastle nor Gateshead as communities actually span the River Tyne. However in Hull, the River Humber is wide enough that Hull never expanded southwards but, for all the cultural identification amongst sports fans who follow Rugby League, and for other cultural reasons, there is a clear mental divide in the City between the community west of the River Hull and the community east of it. However, even at its widest point in the estuary, the now heavily silted up River Hull still traversed by many bridges2 has been of negligible an obstruction to the development of the City. The City has continued, by organic growth or absorption, to expand in a semi-circle with the loosely vertical axis of the River Hull not shewing a marked difference of development either side. We recognise that the LGBCE, the Liberal Democrats, and ourselves in our initial submission have all said they regard the River Hull as a barrier but read with interest the Labour Party’s contrary opinion, and of course recognise that the Parliamentary Boundary Commission (BC) at the last 1 From the Local Government Boundary Commission. Accessed from https://www.lgbce.org.uk/current- reviews/yorkshire-and-the-humber/kingston-upon-hull/kingston-upon-hull on 4th March 2017 at 11.04am 2 There are sixteen bridges in total that cross there River Hull, three of which are in Beverley, and a further one of which is no longer in use. 1 | P a g e Conservative and Unionist Group Submission March 2017 reorganisation3 included wards east of the River as part of the Hull North seat. The Labour Party’s suggestion of high car ownership in the north of the proposed Beverley and Sculcoates Ward is of course incontrovertible but nobody would suggest a car would be a tool to merely cross a dual carriageway. We did, on reflection however, consider that developments on the outskirts of Hull posed a serious challenge to the traditional assumptions. Building a large residential community on the outskirts of a City, some five miles away from the City Centre4, and making sure the community has a large retail park with upmarket retailers,5 school, and café facilities all to hand, is tantamount to building a town adjacent to that City. When the new development is built next to a middle-class residential community such as is at the northern end of Beverley Ward and both communities are united by housing tenure, economic activity and reliance on the car, then they are also going to be united by the retail offer. From Mizzen Road, in the top end of Beverley ward, it is 1.8 miles to the Marks and Spencer at Kingswood where there is free parking and a range of retail offer available; or from the same place to Marks and Spencer on Whitefriargate in the City Centre it is 3.9 miles with no adjacent car parking, no free car parking, and a retail offer that cannot be held to be indubitably better, if undoubtedly a bit wider. It is not unreasonable for us to say that, in cases like this, and where the River Hull really is very narrow, there is a community of interest. Indeed 21,000 vehicle movements a day6 would suggest that the river was not seen as an impediment in this area although, were both communities of Kingswood and northern Beverley Ward to be of low car-ownership this idea would have no traction at all as there are some fields between the two communities7 which would inhibit the casual “have a cuppa”8 test. In circumstances such as this we note that the river, at its narrowest point, with a purpose built residential/amenity/retail/employment offer immediately adjacent to a pre-existing community of stakeholders reflecting a similar demographic and much nearer than the similar offer in the City Centre cannot surely be held to be a major obstacle? We note that the Liberal Democrats say it is,9 in defiance of the last Boundary Commission settlement for the Parliamentary Constituency but are a little askance to read the Liberal Democrats have a different view when it comes to Parliamentary proposals this time round. Whilst we understand the Boundary Commission and LGBCE are doing separate reviews, and are empowered to do so, it does seem strange that Dave McCobb10 should say to the Boundary Commission, 3 “The Fifth Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies” 2007 4 4.9 miles from The Pines at Kingswood to Ferensway in the City Centre 5 Whilst the Kingswood retail park has no formal website, please see their entry on “Completely Retail”, accessed from https://completelyretail.co.uk/portfolio/LegalAndGeneral/scheme/Kingswood-Retail-Park-Hull on 5th March 2017. 6 According to statistics from the Department for Transport’s count data from the A1033 Ennerdale bridge. 7 Largely unused and widely believed to be waiting for the next residential expansion of Hull. 8 Loosely: the idea that someone will randomly step outside their property and go to another friend, not knowing if they are in or not, but living so close it is not a major impediment or inconvenience to an unplanned act. 9 From the Liberal Democrat submission to the LGBCE’s 2016/17 review, accessed from https://www.lgbce.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/31297/LibDems-PG-Hull-2016-10-28_combined- files.pdf on 1st March 2017. 10 City Councillor for the existing Beverley ward and the main instigator of their 2016/17 submissions to the LGBCE 2 | P a g e Conservative and Unionist Group Submission March 2017 “….It [the proposed Hull Central Constituency] also brings together the City Centre in one constituency by putting Drypool and Myton wards into one constituency. Parts of Drypool ward are recognised as being parts of the City Centre.”11 So, at the widest part of the River it is not seen, by Liberal Democrats, as a community cohesion barrier, in a part of the city where car ownership and population are low and the greatest part of the car owning population to the east of the river in Drypool is in the Victoria Dock village south of the A63; but it is a barrier in two similar demographics at the narrowest part of the river? Furthermore the phrase, “Parts of Drypool ward are recognised as being parts of the City Centre.” is disingenuous in the extreme. As a glance at the map reference12 shews it is hard to escape the conclusion that political considerations are leading to a duality of message on this point from one Party. The statement of Kevin Morton13, a significant employee of Diana Johnson MP, on this topic is also interesting. “The Commission [the Parliamentary one] is arguing because of one new river crossing in the City Centre this somehow overcomes physically the divide. That is contentious to say the least. I do not think there has been in the City Centre any greater feeling of oneness between the East and West banks of the River Hull in the city, than there was, say, ten years ago. …although we would argue that as the river flows away from tributary with the Humber it becomes thinner and arguably less important.”14 However this may well be a debate for the future and, because of the LGBCE proposals around Kingswood we are not inclined to adumbrate such an argument in this submission. We also reaffirm our commitment to the concept of four yearly elections and single member Wards of around 3,000 each. We note with pleasure that only one Group is now resolutely opposed to promoting effective local government by ensuring electors can categorically reject an Administration and ensuring a sensible time-frame to allow policy development.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Housing Land Supply Position Statement 2020/21 to 2024/25
    www.eastriding.gov.uk www.eastriding.gov.uk ff YouYouTubeTube East Riding Local Plan 2012 - 2029 Housing Land Supply Position Statement For the period 2020/21 to 2024/25 December 2020 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 1 National Policy .................................................................................................................. 1 Performance ...................................................................................................................... 3 Residual housing requirement ......................................................................................... 5 2 Methodology ........................................................................................................... 7 Developing the Methodology ........................................................................................... 7 Covid-19 ............................................................................................................................. 8 Calculating the Potential Capacity of Sites .................................................................... 9 Pre-build lead-in times ................................................................................................... 10 Build rates for large sites ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • House Number Address Line 1 Address Line 2 Town/Area County
    House Number Address Line 1 Address Line 2 Town/Area County Postcode 64 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 70 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 72 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 74 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 80 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 82 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 84 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 1 Abbey Road Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 4TU 2 Abbey Road Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 4TU 3 Abbey Road Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 4TU 4 Abbey Road Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 4TU 1 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 3 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 5 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 7 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 9 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 11 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 13 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 15 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 17 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 19 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 21 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 23 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 25 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16
    [Show full text]
  • Not for Publication by Virtue of Paragraph 1 of Part 1 Of
    Children’s Services Overview and Scrutiny Commission Panel Enquiry into Youth Services June, 2008 Scrutiny Report No # Chair’s Foreword This enquiry was undertaken after members of the former Lifelong Learning, Culture and Leisure Overview and Scrutiny Commission expressed concern regarding the impact the Youth Matters Green Paper would have on the provision of existing youth provision in the City. In particular we felt that historically, the move to a curriculum based youth service had led to a significant drop in the number of young people accessing youth services in the City. We realised that there were a significant number of current and emerging issues at a national level which would impact on the future delivery of youth services, across all sectors, at a local level. For these reasons we have made a number of strategic recommendations which should be taken into consideration as part of any future service reconfiguration and future commissioning of services for young people. During the course of the enquiry we established that there were a number of areas within the spectrum of both statutory and voluntary youth services which should be addressed. In particular, we found that a number of issues relating to the way the City Council worked with community and voluntary sector organisations in delivering quality, value for money youth activities within the City. We also recognised the need to redress the balance between universal and targeted youth work plus the urgent need to reintroduce outreach and detached youth work within the City. The Panel received a lot of evidence and considered the options very carefully, placing the views of young people as a priority.
    [Show full text]
  • The EYMS Mobile App! Service 130 Buses Now Track Your Bus!
    New: Mon 3 Sept 2018. Bridlington : Fraisthorpe : Skipsea : North Frodingham : Driffield 136 Monday to Saturday a.m. a.m. a.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. Now track Bridlington (Bus Station) .......... - 8 30 1130 2 30 5 00 6 15 Shaftesbury Road/Kingsgate...... - 8 37 1137 2 37 5 07 6 22 your bus! Avocet Way ................................ - - - - 5 08 6 23 Got a smart phone? South Shore Holiday Village ....... - 8 41 1141 2 41 5 11 6 26 Visit www.eyms.co.uk to get Fraisthorpe Lane End ................. - 8 44 1144 2 44 5 14 6 29 a live countdown to when Barmston (Black Bull Pub).......... - 8 47 1147 2 47 5 17 6 32 your bus will arrive. Lissett....................................... - 8 51 1151 2 51 5 21 6 36 Drop-off only Ulrome (Church) ........................ - 8 55 1155 2 55 5 25 6 40 Ulrome (Coastguard Cottages) ... - 8 58 1158 2 58 5 28 6 43 After Fraisthorpe, these Skipsea Village .......................... - 9 06 1206 3 06 5 36 6 51 journeys are for passenger Skipsea Sands Holiday Park ....... - 9 08 1208 3 08 5 38 6 53 drop-off only. Beeford (Post Office) .................. 7 00 9 18 1218 3 18 5 48 7 03 North Frodingham (Post Office)... 7 05 9 23 1223 3 23 5 53 7 08 Wansford ................................... 7 10 9 30 1230 3 30 - - Driffield (George Street) ........... 7 19 9 39 1239 3 39 - - No Sunday Buses Service 130 buses For additional buses between Skipsea and Bridlington, pick-up a Service 130 leaflet. Driffield : North Frodingham : Skipsea : Fraisthorpe : Bridlington 136 Monday to Saturday The EYMS a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Appointments to Outside Bodies 2021/22
    EAST RIDING OF YORKSHIRE COUNCIL List of appointments to Outside Bodies 2021/22 NB -All appointments are made at the Council AGM for the period of the municipal year unless otherwise stated. National, Regional and Sub-Regional Organisations Outside Body Representatives CATCH Board Cllr Evison County Councils Network Cllr Owen Cllr Holtby Cllr Aitken Cllr V Walker Hull & East Riding Unitary Leaders’ Board Cllr Owen Cllr Holtby Humber Coast and Vale Chairs and Members Group Cllr V Walker Humber Leadership Board Cllr Owen Cllr Holtby Humber Strategy Comprehensive Review Elected Members Cllr Matthews Forum Humber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust – Council of Cllr Wilkinson Governors Humberside Crimestoppers Cllr Padden Humberside Fire Authority Cllr Chadwick Cllr Dennis Cllr Fox Cllr Green Cllr Healing Cllr Smith Cllr Davison Cllr Jefferson LEP - Hull & East Yorkshire LEP Board Cllr Owen - Sub-Boards to be confirmed Local Government Association Cllr Owen Cllr Holtby Cllr Lee Cllr Nolan (observer) - Coastal Special Interest Group Cllr Matthews - Rural Services Network Cllr Evison v1_FINAL 07/07/21 WEB Outside Body Representatives North Eastern IFCA Cllr Matthews Cllr Copsey Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust Vacancy Council of Governors Police and Crime Panel Cllr Gateshill Cllr Nickerson Cllr Abraham Substitutes - Cllr Weeks/Cllr Birch Rail North Committee Cllr McMaster Reserved Forces and Cadets Association for Yorkshire and Cllr Elvidge the Humber Cllr Wilkinson SWAP Internal Audit Partnership Members’ Board Cllr Temple Substitute
    [Show full text]
  • Lissett Community Wind Farm Fund Annual Report | April 2011 - March 2012
    Lissett Community Wind Farm Fund Annual Report | April 2011 - March 2012 Infinis is one of the country’s leading renewable energy Fund Criteria producers and the operating company responsible for the The criteria for grant applications is ‘public benefit’ and Lissett Community Wind Farm. As part of the development’s community groups, organisations and parish councils applying planning permission, granted in 2007 a commitment was made for grants must show how the project for which they are asking by the developers within to create a community fund. for money will be of benefit to the public. The fund, Lissett Community Wind Farm Fund receives an Annual Donation from Infinis of £2,000 per megawatt of Public Benefit can be a difficult concept to define and installed operating capacity of the wind farm to a maximum of can be broadly interpreted. As a guide the charity £60,000 per annum. The first donation of £53,360 was paid commission recommends that: into the fund in January 2010, ten months after the wind farm • The benefits of a project are demonstrable began exporting electricity to the national grid and since that • The activity must be open to all of the public or a time has received two further donations of £60,000 each have section of the public been received. The Infinis total donation of £173,360 has been The Lissett Community Wind Farm Fund panel asks received to date. for reports which give details and evidence of activities undertaken using the money awarded. Fund Aims The Lissett Community Wind Farm Fund panel looks The aim of the fund is to provide grants to community groups at applications to ensure that activities are open to all and organisations and parish councils in the East Wolds and members of the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Education in British Urban Priority Areas with Special Reference to Hull
    COMMUNITY EDUCATION IN BRITISH URBAN PRIORITY AREAS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO HULL JAMES ANTHONY McELLIGOTT Submitted to the University of London Institute of Education for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (Ph.D.) BBL LONDIN. UNIV. 1 ABSTRACT This thesis develops a model of community education for non traditional adult learners from the least socially and educationally advantaged groups living in the priority areas of urban Britain. The model is investigated through a case study of a community education project situated within North Hull. The thesis is organised into six chapters. Chapter One commences with a detailed analysis of urban priority areas and examines the cumulative effects of post war material conditions, social dislocation and educational underachievement. Educational proposals for ameliorating the situation are reviewed, including the idea of closer links with the home and neighbourhood as part of a community education solution. Chapter Two develops this emerging theme of community education by examining compensatory and reconstructionist models of British community education in which USA models of compensation and the idea of community problem solving became influential Following this early discussion, a model for community education in priority areas is proposed in Chapter Three. The model has the overall purpose of developing adult learners and achieving more open and accessible institutions through a two stage continuum of learning opportunities. Chapter Four describes the North Hull Community Outreach Project which investigates the model in practice. In Chapter Five an evaluation of the case study is carried out to analyse the potential value of the model. Chapter Six brings together the main findings of the thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • 136 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    136 bus time schedule & line map 136 Bridlington - Dri∆eld View In Website Mode The 136 bus line (Bridlington - Dri∆eld) has 4 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Beeford <-> Dri∆eld: 7:00 AM (2) Bridlington <-> Dri∆eld: 8:30 AM - 2:30 PM (3) Bridlington <-> North Frodingham: 5:00 PM - 6:15 PM (4) Dri∆eld <-> Bridlington: 7:20 AM - 3:40 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 136 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 136 bus arriving. Direction: Beeford <-> Dri∆eld 136 bus Time Schedule 15 stops Beeford <-> Dri∆eld Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 7:00 AM Beeford Main Street, Beeford Meadow Close, Beeford Civil Parish Tuesday 7:00 AM Beeford Main Street, Beeford Wednesday 7:00 AM Beeford Main Street, Beeford Thursday 7:00 AM Friday 7:00 AM Beeford Main Street, Beeford Saturday 7:00 AM North Frodingham Main St, North Frodingham North Frodingham Main St, North Frodingham 79 Main Street, North Frodingham Civil Parish 136 bus Info North Frodingham Main St, North Frodingham Direction: Beeford <-> Dri∆eld 55 Main Street, North Frodingham Civil Parish Stops: 15 Trip Duration: 19 min North Frodingham Main St, North Frodingham Line Summary: Beeford Main Street, Beeford, 37 Main Street, North Frodingham Civil Parish Beeford Main Street, Beeford, Beeford Main Street, Beeford, Beeford Main Street, Beeford, North North Frodingham Main St, North Frodingham Frodingham Main St, North Frodingham, North 11 Main Street, North Frodingham Civil Parish Frodingham Main St, North Frodingham, North Frodingham Main St, North Frodingham, North Brigham Cross Roads, Brigham Frodingham Main St, North Frodingham, North Frodingham Main St, North Frodingham, Brigham Wansford Trout Inn, Wansford Cross Roads, Brigham, Wansford Trout Inn, Wansford, Wansford B1249, Wansford, Dri∆eld Wansford B1249, Wansford Beverley Road, Dri∆eld, Dri∆eld St John's Road, Dri∆eld, Dri∆eld George Street, Dri∆eld Dri∆eld Beverley Road, Dri∆eld 28 Beverley Road, Dri∆eld Civil Parish Dri∆eld St John's Road, Dri∆eld 22 St.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNAL POST Members Information INTERNAL POST
    HUMBER BRIDGE Councillor L Redfern Councillor D Gemmell BOARD North Lincolnshire Council, Civic Kingston upon Hull City Council Centre Ashby Road Scunthorpe DN16 1AN Councillor S Parnaby OBE, Councillor C Shaw Lord C Haskins East Riding of Yorkshire Council North East Lincolnshire Council Quarryside Farm, County Hall Skidby, Beverley Cottingham, HU17 9BA East Yorkshire, HU16 5TG Mr S Martin Professor D Stephenson Mr J Butler Chief Executive, Clugston Clerk to the Humber Bridge 33 Hambling Drive Group Ltd Board Molescroft St Vincent House, Normanby Beverley Road, Scunthorpe HU17 9GD DN15 8QT Mr P Hill Mr P Dearing Anita Eckersley General Manager and Legal Services Committee Clerk to the Humber Bridgemaster Kingston upon Hull City Council Bridge Board Humber Bridge Administration Offices Ferriby Road, Hessle HU13 0JG Councillor Turner MBE, Other recipients for Mrs J Rae, Audit Commission Lincolnshire County Council information, Audit Commission c/o Hull City Council, Floor 2 Wilson Centre, Alfred Gelder Street, Hull HU1 2AG Nigel Pearson Simon Driver Shaun Walsh, Chief Executive Chief Executive Chief Executive East riding of Yorkshire Council North Lincolnshire Council North East Lincolnshire Council Civic Centre, Ashby Road Municipal Offices, Town Hall Scunthorpe Square, Grimsby DN16 1AN DN31 1HU INTERNAL POST INTERNAL POST Members Information Reference Library APPEALS COMMITTEE Councillor Abbott Councillor Conner Councillor P D Clark INTERNAL MAIL INTERNAL MAIL G Paddock K Bowen Neighbourhood Nuisance Team Neighbourhood Nuisance Team HAND
    [Show full text]
  • East Yorkshire Hornsea
    East Yorkshire Hornsea - Bridlington 130 Monday to Friday Ref.No.: BB6 Service No 130 130 Hornsea Cliff Road 0930 1230 Hornsea (The Willows) 0936 1236 Atwick Post Office 0941 1241 Skirlington Camp 0944 1244 Skipsea Village 0947 1247 Skipsea Sands Holiday Park 0951 1251 Skipsea Village 0955 1255 Ulrome Church 1000 1300 Ulrome (Coastguard Cottages) 1002 1302 Ulrome Church 1004 1304 Lissett Village 1007 1307 Barmston Lane End 1011 1311 Barmston Village (Caravan Park) 1014 1314 Barmston Lane End 1017 1317 Fraisthorpe Lane End 1020 1320 South Shore Holiday Village 1024 1324 Hilderthorpe Road (Railway Station) 1032 1332 Bridlington Bus Station 1035 1335 Bridlington - Hornsea 130 Service No 130 130 Bridlington Bus Station Dep1045 1345 Hilderthorpe Road (Railway Station) 1048 1348 South Shore Holiday Village 1056 1356 Fraisthorpe Lane End 1100 1400 Barmston Lane End 1103 1403 Barmston Village (Caravan Park) 1106 1406 Barmston Lane End 1109 1409 Lissett Village 1113 1413 Ulrome Church 1116 1416 Ulrome (Coastguard Cottages) 1118 1418 Ulrome Church 1120 1420 Skipsea Village 1125 1425 Skipsea Sands Holiday Park 1129 1429 Skipsea Village 1133 1433 Skirlington Camp 1136 1436 Atwick Post Office 1139 1439 Hornsea (The Willows) 1144 1444 Hornsea Cliff Road 1150 1450 East Yorkshire Hornsea - Bridlington 130 Saturday Ref.No.: BB6 Service No 130 130 Hornsea Cliff Road 0930 1600 Hornsea (The Willows) 0936 1606 Atwick Post Office 0941 1611 Skirlington Camp 0944 1614 Skipsea Village 0947 1617 Skipsea Sands Holiday Park 0951 1621 Skipsea Village 0955 1625 Ulrome
    [Show full text]
  • Hull Core Strategy Volume 3: Report on Engagement
    Hull Core Strategy Volume 3: Report on engagement June 2011 Volume 3 – Report on engagement on the Hull Core Strategy Introduction This report details further community engagement used to inform the Publication version of the Core Strategy. It includes comments: • made over the period from June 2008 in response to the Core Strategy – Issues/options stage; and • up to and after the February 2010 Core Strategy – Emerging Preferred Approach (up to March 2010). Details are provided in terms of the responses made through the City Council, as detailed in Appendix 1 and through meetings with other stakeholders outside of the City Council, as detailed in Appendix 2. Appendix 3 outlines comments on the accompanying Sustainability Appraisal. This volume forms an additional part of ‘front loading’ the engagement process in conforming with the Council’s adopted Statement of Community Involvement and under Regulation 25 of the Town and Country Planning Local Development Regulations, 2008. It should be read alongside other community engagement work as detailed in Volumes 1 and 2. Background The City Council has completed extensive engagement in preparing its Hull Core Strategy, in meeting soundness tests and localism objectives. It has completed these tasks in conforming to its Statement of Community Involvement, adopted 2006. Feedback from various plan making stages has informed the preparation of policies in tackling social, economic and environmental challenges facing the future city. In summary, community involvement in plan preparation has included
    [Show full text]
  • C DPM Records of Hull Magistrates Court C.1836-1995
    Hull History Centre: Records of Hull Magistrates Court C DPM Records of Hull Magistrates Court c.1836-1995 Historical background: Magistrates courts are the lowest level of courts in Enlgand, and is where alomst all criminal proceedings start. Hull was first granted the right to appoint its own magistrates, also known as Justices of the Peace (JPs), to deal with the summary cases, in 1440. More serious offences or indictable crimes would be passed to the quarter sessions or to the county assize, for capital cases. Despite the abolition of the old municipal corporation in 1836, the reformed borough was still able to select its own magistrates and hold its own courts, sometimes also known as police courts or petty sessions. This system continued until the reforms of the 1971 Courts Act, where the magistrate’s courts remained at lowest level, with the quarter sessions replaced by crown courts. The magistrate’s courts could also hear some civil cases, when county courts were established under the County Court Act 1846. They had jurisdiction over the recovery of debts and civil actions up to certain financial limits, including bankruptcy. Custodial History: The first group of records transferred to the City Archives were selected by the Clerk to the Magistrates at the Hull and Holderness Magistrates Courts in 1986, with another series of licensing records, C DPM/24 and C DPM/43-44, transferred in September 1993. C DPM/47 was transferred in January 2008 from the Hull County Court. C DPM/5/10- 12, C DPM/7/37-39, C DPM/24/2-5 and C DPM/48-49 were transferred in December 2016 from the Hull and Holderness Courts.
    [Show full text]