DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Haze State Public Docket Without Change

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Haze State Public Docket Without Change 13944 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Proposed Rules shall constitute the official record of the Ambient Air Quality Standards Docket Center homepage at http:// proceeding. (NAAQS). www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. Docket: All documents in the docket DATES: § 952.33 Public information. Written comments must be are listed in the http:// The Librarian of the Postal Service received at the address below on or www.regulations.gov index. Although maintains for public inspection in the before April 14, 2011. listed in the index, some information is Library copies of all initial, tentative ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, not publicly available (e.g., CBI or other and final agency decisions and orders. identified by Docket ID Number EPA– information whose disclosure is The Recorder maintains the complete R09–OAR–2011—0131 by one of the restricted by statute). Certain other official record of every proceeding. following methods: material, such as copyrighted material, 1. Federal Rulemaking portal: http:// will be publicly available only in hard § 952.34 Ex parte communications. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line copy form. Publicly available docket The provisions of 5 U.S.C. 551(14), instructions for submitting comments. materials are available either 556(d), and 557(d) prohibiting ex parte 2. E-mail: [email protected]. electronically at http:// communications apply to proceedings 3. Fax: 415–947–3579 (Attention: www.regulations.gov, or in hard copy at under these rules of practice. Jerry Wamsley). the EPA Region 9, Air Division, Stanley F. Mires, 4. Mail: Jerry Wamsley, EPA Region 9, Planning Office, Air-2, 75 Hawthorne Chief Counsel, Legislative. Air Division, Planning Office (Air-2), 75 Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. EPA [FR Doc. 2011–5872 Filed 3–14–11; 8:45 am] Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, requests that you contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION BILLING CODE 7710–12–P California 94105. 5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Such CONTACT section to view the hard copy deliveries are only accepted Monday of the docket. You may view the hard through Friday, 8:30 a.m.–4:30 p.m., copy of the docket Monday through ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Friday, 9–5:30 PST, excluding Federal AGENCY excluding Federal holidays. Special arrangements should be made for holidays. 40 CFR Part 52 deliveries of boxed information. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry Instructions: Direct your comments to Wamsley, U.S.E.P.A., Region 9, Air [EPA–R09–OAR–2011—0131, FRL–9280–5] Docket ID No. EPA–R09–OAR–2011— Division, Planning Office, Air-2, 75 Approval and Promulgation of Air 0131. Our policy is that EPA will Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA Quality Implementation Plans; State of include all comments received in the 94105; via telephone at (415) 947–4111; California; Regional Haze State public docket without change. EPA may or via electronic mail at Implementation Plan and Interstate make comments available online at [email protected]. http://www.regulations.gov, including Transport Plan; Interference With SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Visibility Requirement any personal information provided, Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ unless the comment includes or ‘‘our,’’ refer to EPA. AGENCY: Environmental Protection information claimed to be Confidential Agency (EPA). Business Information (CBI) or other Table of Contents ACTION: Proposed rule. information whose disclosure is I. The State’s Submittals restricted by statute. Do not submit II. What is the background for EPA’s SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve information through http:// proposed action? a revision to the California State www.regulations.gov or e-mail that you A. The Regional Haze Problem Implementation Plan (SIP) that consider to be CBI or otherwise B. Requirements of the CAA and EPA’s addresses regional haze for the first protected. The http:// Regional Haze Rule implementation period through 2018. www.regulations.gov Web site is an C. Roles of Agencies in Addressing This revision addresses the ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which Regional Haze D. Interstate Transport Pollution and requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA means EPA will not know your identity Visibility Requirements or ‘‘Act’’) and EPA’s rules that require or contact information unless you III. What are the requirements for regional states to prevent any future and remedy provide it in the body of your comment. haze SIPs? any existing anthropogenic impairment If you send an e-mail comment directly A. The CAA and the Regional Haze Rule of visibility in mandatory Class I areas to EPA, without going through http:// B. Determination of Baseline, Natural, and caused by emissions of air pollutants www.regulations.gov, EPA will include Current Visibility Conditions from numerous sources located over a your e-mail address as part of the C. Determination of Reasonable Progress wide geographic area (also referred to as comment that is placed in the public Goals the ‘‘regional haze program’’). States are docket and made available on the D. Best Available Retrofit Technology E. Long Term Strategy required to assure reasonable progress Internet. If you submit an electronic F. Coordination of the Regional Haze SIP toward the national goal of achieving comment, EPA recommends that you and Reasonably Attributable Visibility natural visibility conditions in Class I include your name and other contact Impairment areas. information in the body of your G. Monitoring Strategy and Other In addition, we are proposing to comment and with any disk or CD–ROM Implementation Plan Requirements approve certain portions of this you submit. If EPA cannot read your H. Consultation With States and Federal Regional Haze SIP revision and a related comment due to technical difficulties Land Managers SIP revision submitted by California on and cannot contact you for clarification, IV. EPA’s Analysis of the California Regional November 16, 2007, as meeting the EPA may not be able to consider your Haze Plan A. Affected Class I Areas in California requirements of CAA Section comment. Electronic files should avoid B. Visibility Conditions and Uniform Rate 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) regarding interference the use of special characters, any form of Progress with other states’ measures to protect of encryption, and be free of any defects 1. Baseline and Natural Visibility visibility for the 1997 8-hour ozone and or viruses. For additional information Conditions 1997 particulate matter (PM2.5) National about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA 2. Uniform Rate of Progress Estimate VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:13 Mar 14, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15MRP1.SGM 15MRP1 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Proposed Rules 13945 C. California Emissions Inventories March 16, 2009 submittal includes II. What is the background for EPA’s D. Sources of Visibility Impairment public process documentation for the proposed action? 1. Sources of Visibility Impairment in CRHP and documentation of a duly California Class I Areas A. The Regional Haze Problem 2. California Contributions to Visibility noticed public hearing held on January Impairment in Class I Areas Outside of 22, 2009. Regional haze is visibility impairment produced by a multitude of sources and the State On November 16, 2007, ARB E. Best Available Retrofit Technology activities located across a broad Evaluation submitted the State Strategy for geographic area that emit fine particles California’s 2007 State Implementation 1. Sources Potentially Subject to BART (PM2.5) (e.g., sulfates, nitrates, organic 2. Sources Not Contributing to Visibility Plan to attain the 1997 8-hour ozone and carbon, elemental carbon, and soil dust), 4 Impairment PM2.5 NAAQS (2007 State Strategy). and their precursors (e.g., sulfur dioxide 3. Sources Already Controlled to BART Appendix C of the 2007 State Strategy, (SO2), oxides of nitrogen (NOX) and in F. Visibility Projections for 2018 and the as modified by Attachment A,5 contains Reasonable Progress Goals some cases, ammonia (NH3) and volatile 1. Establishing the Reasonable Progress the ‘‘Interstate Transport State organic compounds (VOC)). Fine Goals Implementation Plan (SIP) for 8-hour particle precursors react in the 2. Interstate Consultation Ozone and PM2.5 to satisfy the atmosphere to form fine particulate G. Long-Term Strategy Requirements of Clean Air Act section matter which impairs visibility by 1. Ongoing Air Pollution Control Programs 110(a)(2)(D)(i) for the State of California’’ scattering and absorbing light. Visibility a. Mobile Source Programs impairment reduces the clarity, color, b. Stationary and Area Source Regulations (2007 Transport SIP). The 2007 by Local Air Agencies Transport SIP addresses the Transport and visible distance that one can see. 2. Construction Activities SIP requirements of CAA section PM2.5 can also cause serious health 3. Source Retirement and Replacement 110(a)(2)(D)(i) for the 1997 effects and mortality in humans and Schedules 8-hour ozone and 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. contributes to environmental impacts, 4. Smoke Management Programs ARB’s November 16, 2007 submittal such as acid deposition and 5. Enforceability of Measures in the Long- eutrophication. Term Strategy includes public process documentation for the 2007 State Strategy, including Data from the existing visibility H. Monitoring Strategy ‘‘ I. Federal Land Manager Consultation and the 2007 Transport SIP. In addition, the monitoring network, the Interagency Coordination SIP revision includes documentation of Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments’’ (IMPROVE) monitoring J. Periodic SIP Revisions and Five-year a duly noticed public hearing held on network, show that visibility Progress Reports September 27, 2007 on the proposed V. EPA’s Analysis of How California’s impairment caused by air pollution 2007 State Strategy. Regional Haze Plan Meets Interstate occurs virtually all the time at most Transport Requirements For the portion of today’s proposed national park and wilderness areas.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Statement of Joel Holtrop Deputy Chief for the National Forest System U.S
    Final Testimony 1 Statement of Joel Holtrop Deputy Chief for the National Forest System U.S. Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Before the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Natural Resources Committee United States House of Representatives November 13, 2007 Concerning H.R. 2334, Rocky Mountain National Park Wilderness and Indian Peaks Wilderness Expansion Act H.R. 3287, Tumacacori Highlands Wilderness Act of 2007 H.R. 3513, Copper Salmon Wilderness Act H.R. 3682, California Desert and Mountain Heritage Act Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee, I appreciate the opportunity to appear before you today to provide the Department’s view on the Rocky Mountain National Park Wilderness and Indian Peaks Wilderness Expansion Act, the Tumacacori Highlands Wilderness Act of 2007, the Copper Salmon Wilderness Act, and the California Desert and Mountain Heritage Act. I will address each of these individually. H.R. 2334, Rocky Mountain National Park Wilderness and Indian Peaks Wilderness Expansion Act Section 6 of H.R. 2332 would remove acreage from the Arapaho National Recreation Area in the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest and designate the land as an addition to the existing Indian Peaks Wilderness Area. The Department of Agriculture supports the addition to the Indian Peaks Wilderness. We defer to the Department of the Interior regarding those portions of the bill affecting lands administered by the National Park Service. H.R. 3287, Tumacacori Highlands Wilderness Act of 2007 This bill would designate new wilderness areas on the Coronado National Forest in Arizona by expanding the Pajarita Wilderness approximately 5,500 acres (for a total of about 13,300 acres) and designating some additional 70,000 acres as the Tumacacori Highlands Wilderness.
    [Show full text]
  • A. INTRODUCTION the Agua Tibia Research
    A. INTRODUCTION The Agua Tibia Research Natural Area (ATRNA) was selected to represent the Bigcone Douglas-fir-Canyon Live Oak Forest 1 vegetation type for the Peninsular Ranges physiographic province. The ATRNA encompasses 480 acres (194 ha) within the Agua Tibia Wilderness on the Palomar Ranger District of the Cleveland National Forest. The area was nominated for Research Natural Area (RNA) designation by the Forest Supervisor, and an Ecological Survey of the unit was completed in 1989 (Frazier 1989). In August 1989, a fire swept through much of the Agua Tibia Wilderness. Forest Service fire crews mounted an intense effort to reduce the fire's impact on the ATRNA, but some areas of the ATRNA could not be completely protected from the fire's effects. The chaparral areas of the RNA were the most affected. The larger bigcone Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga macrocarpa) were not affected, although some seedlings and saplings were consumed. After a post-fire reconnaissance of the area by Frazier (1989), the Regional Research Natural Area Committee concluded that the fire's effect on the values of the ATRNA were insignificant, and subsequently recommended its establishment in 1990. Two plant species encountered on the ATRNA, Laguna linanthus (Linanthus orcuttii ssp. pacificus) and Hall's monardella (Monardella macrantha ssp. hallii), are listed as Forest sensitive, and are on the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) list 1b, plants rare throughout their range. Two additional species, California honeysuckle (Lonicera hispidula) and Hall's brome (Bromus orcuttianus var. hallii), are considered rare in San Diego County by Beauchamp (1986). No federally or state listed plant species are known to occur within the ATRNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) Annual Report to the Wildlife Agencies
    Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Biological Monitoring Program Rare Plant Survey Report 2011 08 June 2012 Rare Plant Survey Report 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................................................1 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................................2 PROTOCOL DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................................2 SURVEY SITE SELECTION...................................................................................................................2 SURVEY METHODS ............................................................................................................................4 PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ...............................................................................................................5 DATA ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................6 RESULTS.......................................................................................................................................................7 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 111-11
    PUBLIC LAW 111–11—MAR. 30, 2009 123 STAT. 991 Public Law 111–11 111th Congress An Act To designate certain land as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System, to authorize certain programs and activities in the Department of the Mar. 30, 2009 Interior and the Department of Agriculture, and for other purposes. [H.R. 146] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Omnibus Public Land SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. Management Act (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Omnibus of 2009. Public Land Management Act of 2009’’. 16 USC 1 note. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. TITLE I—ADDITIONS TO THE NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM Subtitle A—Wild Monongahela Wilderness Sec. 1001. Designation of wilderness, Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia. Sec. 1002. Boundary adjustment, Laurel Fork South Wilderness, Monongahela Na­ tional Forest. Sec. 1003. Monongahela National Forest boundary confirmation. Sec. 1004. Enhanced Trail Opportunities. Subtitle B—Virginia Ridge and Valley Wilderness Sec. 1101. Definitions. Sec. 1102. Designation of additional National Forest System land in Jefferson Na­ tional Forest as wilderness or a wilderness study area. Sec. 1103. Designation of Kimberling Creek Potential Wilderness Area, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Sec. 1104. Seng Mountain and Bear Creek Scenic Areas, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Sec. 1105. Trail plan and development. Sec. 1106. Maps and boundary descriptions. Sec. 1107. Effective date. Subtitle C—Mt. Hood Wilderness, Oregon Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L
    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • January/February 2015
    Sierra Club San Diego Chapter • Serving Imperial and San Diego Counties Working To Preserve The Special Nature of San Diego for Over Half A Century Vol 74 No. 1 Visit our website at: www.sandiego.sierraclub.org January/February 2015 Sierra Club San Diego Leaders Retreat Life (WBC) Begins Again Sets Priorities for 2015 by Kristi Anderson Debbie Hecht, Chair, Sierra Club San Diego It all started for me back in 1996… it’s called the WBC, On November 8 and 9th 25 dedicated Sierra Club Leaders attended a or the Wilderness Basics Course. That first year of class one and a half day retreat at Tecolote Canyon Nature Preserve to priori- changed my life. Fast forward 18 years and I’m still tize our goals for 2015. We asked Group and Committee leaders to dis- here! I now have a unique perspective in that I’ve been cuss within their groups their top priorities and bring that information a Chapter Outing Leader, a staff member, edited the to the Retreat. 3rd and 4th editions of the WBC book, and in 2014, I was Chair of the San Diego section of the WBC. I had At our request, Sierra Club National sent Allison Chin to facilitate. the privilege of running this class that I love. Allison has been past national Sierra Club President twice and is now a So what is it like being on staff? Well, it’s about being with and working with the best kind of people. A group of people who love the outdoors and who have dedicated themselves to paying it forward, teaching students how to safely enjoy the wilderness – the legacy of WBC.
    [Show full text]
  • National Geographic's National Conservation Lands 15Th
    P ow ear Pt. Barr d B 5 ay Bellingham Ross Lake E ison Bay Harr PACIFIC NORT S HWES Cape Flattery t San Juan T N ra Islands AT i I LisburneCape N o t SAN JUAN ISLANDS ONAL S r t h S l o p e of CE P Ju N IC a NATIONAL MONUMENT T e F N 9058 ft KMt. Isto Cape Alava n R CANADA KCopper Butte n 61 m d A l . lvill 27 e a L B o e F I d F U.S. C u L 7135 ft t M o Central Arctic c o d R a 2175 m O K h i r l g Management o e r k k e O E Priest o a e 2 C Area G t d O 101 i L. e r K N l . A n S P S R l 95 as K i e r E a 93 Ma o ot Central Arctic a i p z a L i e l b Management KGlacier Pk. Lake E a 97 b W IS A 15 ue Mt. Olympus K l N r Area STEESE 10541 ft D S Chelan m o CANADA 7965 ft i 89 Cape Prince NATIONAL 3213 m C 2 u uk 2428 m 2 u n k Franklin D. l L Lake Elwell d CONSERVATION U.S. s A of Wales u r R R Roosevelt o K oy AREA Y Bureau of Land Management e C h K u L lle N I ei h AT 191 Seward k Lake 2 Or s ION IC TRAIL 2 o A d R 395 Pen i A O L.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventoried Roadless Areas and Wilderness Evaluations
    Introduction and Evaluation Process Summary Inventoried Roadless Areas and Wilderness Evaluations For reader convenience, all wilderness evaluation documents are compiled here, including duplicate sections that are also found in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix D Inventoried Roadless Areas. Introduction and Evaluation Process Summary Inventoried Roadless Areas Proposed Wilderness by and Wilderness Evaluations Alternative Introduction and Evaluation Process Summary Roadless areas refer to substantially natural landscapes without constructed and maintained roads. Some improvements and past activities are acceptable within roadless areas. Inventoried roadless areas are identified in a set of maps contained in the Forest Service Roadless Area Conservation Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), Volume 2, November 2000. These areas may contain important environmental values that warrant protection and are, as a general rule, managed to preserve their roadless characteristics. In the past, roadless areas were evaluated as potential additions to the National Wilderness Preservation System. Roadless areas have maintained their ecological and social values, and are important both locally and nationally. Recognition of the values of roadless areas is increasing as our population continues to grow and demand for outdoor recreation and other uses of the Forests rises. These unroaded and undeveloped areas provide the Forests with opportunities for potential wilderness, as well as non-motorized recreation, commodities and amenities. The original Forest Plans evaluated Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE II) data from the mid- 1980s and recommended wilderness designation for some areas. Most areas were left in a roadless, non- motorized use status. This revision of Forest Plans analyzes a new and more complete land inventory of inventoried roadless areas as well as other areas identified by the public during scoping.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichens and Air Quality in the Agua Tibia Wilderness, California
    LICHENS AND AIR QUALITY IN THE AGUA TIBIA WILDERNESS, CALIFORNIA: A BASELINE STUDY Bruce D. Ryan Department of Botany Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287 May 1990 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was funded by the U.S. Forest Service, through an agreement with Arizona State University. Thanks go to Lisa Croft for assisting in the fieldwork, and to Bob Doty and Thomas Nash III for their help. INTRODUCTION Little information on the lichens of San Diego County is available from previous studies. Hasse (1913) mentioned only a few species, mostly from the coastal areas in the vicinity of San Diego itself, and Sigal & Nash (1983) described some of the foliose and fruticose species found on conifers in Cuyamaca State Park (ca.70 km southeast of the Agua Tibia Wilderness) and Palomar Mountain (ca.4 km. southeast of the Wilderness). The present study, focusing on the Aqua Tibia Wilderness, is the first detailed investigation of the lichen flora of this area of California. STUDY SITE The Agua Tibia Wilderness, in the Cleveland National Forest, is located in one of the Peninsular Ranges, ca. 30 mi north-northeast of Escondido. The southern part is in San Diego County, while the northern part is in Riverside County. Most of the rocks in the Agua Tibia Wilderness are'mesozoic igneous (and metamorphic) rocks of the southern California batholith (including quartz diorite and various granitic rocks), with smaller areas of pre-batholith metamorphic and igneous rocks and Quaternary and Teritary sedimentary and volcanic rocks (Oakeshott, 1971). Vascular Vegetation The vascular flora of San Diego County has recently been described by Beauchamp (1986).
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional 20071113 HR26
    Statement of Elena Daly, Director National Landscape Conservation System Bureau of Land Management House Committee on Natural Resources H.R. 2632, Sabinoso Wilderness Act, H.R. 3682, California Desert and Mountain Heritage Act, H.R. 2334, Rocky Mountain National Park Wilderness and Indian Peaks Wilderness Expansion Act November 13, 2007 Thank you for inviting me to testify on H.R. 2632, the Sabinoso Wilderness Act, H.R. 3682, the California Desert and Mountain Heritage Act, and H.R. 2334, Rocky Mountain National Park Wilderness and Indian Peaks Wilderness Expansion Act. The Department strongly supports Congressional efforts to resolve wilderness designations throughout the West, and we welcome this opportunity to further those efforts. Only Congress can determine whether to designate Wilderness Study Areas (WSAs) as wilderness or release them for other multiple uses. We support the resolution of WSA issues and stand ready to work with Members of Congress toward this goal. H.R. 2632, Sabinoso Wilderness Act The Department of the Interior supports H.R. 2632, a bill designating 19,880 acres of BLM- managed land in northwestern New Mexico as the Sabinoso Wilderness area. The Sabinoso area provides a rugged and dramatic landscape. Deep sinuous canyons are interspersed with flat- topped mesas in an area that has changed little over the last several hundred years. While there is both archaeological and historical evidence of sporadic human visitation, the rough nature of the terrain has discouraged all but the hardiest. Today, the canyons and mesas are home to mule deer, elk, mountain lion, and wild turkey. Golden eagles and turkey vultures soar off the thermals rising from sandstone canyon walls.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,769 86 25,855 Alabama Totals 42,217 86 42,303 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,785 519 75,304 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,089 0 19,089 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,900 0 39,900 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 7 7 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 967,423 0 967,423 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 34,429 34,429 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,698 0 60,698 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,685 0 4,685 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,146,679 237 2,146,916 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 47,106 0 47,106 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,267 0 23,267 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 56 56 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 336,513 0 336,513 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 61 61 Refresh Date: 10/18/2014 Table 7 - National
    [Show full text]
  • Palomar Mountain 2019
    2 | Page 3 | Page Community Wildfire Protection Plans (CWPP) are blueprints for preparedness at the neighborhood level. They organize a community’s efforts to protect itself against wildfire, and empower citizens to move in a cohesive, common direction. Among the key goals of Palomar Mountain’s CWPP, which was developed collaboratively by citizens, and federal, state and local management agencies, are to: ● Align with the San Diego County Fire/CAL FIRE’s cohesive pre-fire strategy, which includes educating homeowners and building understanding of wildland fire, ensuring defensible space clearing and structure hardening, safeguarding communities through fuels treatment, and protecting evacuation corridors ● Identify and prioritize areas for hazardous fuel reduction treatment ● Recommend the types and methods of treatment that will protect the community ● Recommend measures to reduce the ignitability of structures throughout the area addressed by the plan Note: The CWPP is not to be construed as indicative of project “activity” as defined under the “Community Guide to the California Environmental Quality Act, Chapter Three, Projects Subject to CEQA.” Any actual project activities undertaken that meet this definition of project activity and are undertaken by the CWPP participants or agencies listed shall meet with local, state and federal environmental compliance requirements. 4 | Page A. Overview Set atop one of the highest peaks in San Diego County, the community of Palomar Mountain is a picturesque enclave popular among hikers, campers, and others seeking an escape from city life. It is also home to California Institute of Technology’s Palomar Observatory, known for its iconic white dome shape, as well as United States Forest Service, county and state park campgrounds, and the Palomar Christian Conference Center.
    [Show full text]