Educational Resource for REMBRANDT REMASTERED 1 May to 5 June 2017
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rembrandt Van Rijn
Rembrandt van Rijn 1606-1669 REMBRANDT HARMENSZ. VAN RIJN, born 15 July er (1608-1651), Govaert Flinck (1615-1660), and 1606 in Leiden, was the son of a miller, Harmen Ferdinand Bol (1616-1680), worked during these Gerritsz. van Rijn (1568-1630), and his wife years at Van Uylenburgh's studio under Rem Neeltgen van Zuytbrouck (1568-1640). The brandt's guidance. youngest son of at least ten children, Rembrandt In 1633 Rembrandt became engaged to Van was not expected to carry on his father's business. Uylenburgh's niece Saskia (1612-1642), daughter Since the family was prosperous enough, they sent of a wealthy and prominent Frisian family. They him to the Leiden Latin School, where he remained married the following year. In 1639, at the height of for seven years. In 1620 he enrolled briefly at the his success, Rembrandt purchased a large house on University of Leiden, perhaps to study theology. the Sint-Anthonisbreestraat in Amsterdam for a Orlers, Rembrandt's first biographer, related that considerable amount of money. To acquire the because "by nature he was moved toward the art of house, however, he had to borrow heavily, creating a painting and drawing," he left the university to study debt that would eventually figure in his financial the fundamentals of painting with the Leiden artist problems of the mid-1650s. Rembrandt and Saskia Jacob Isaacsz. van Swanenburgh (1571 -1638). After had four children, but only Titus, born in 1641, three years with this master, Rembrandt left in 1624 survived infancy. After a long illness Saskia died in for Amsterdam, where he studied for six months 1642, the very year Rembrandt painted The Night under Pieter Lastman (1583-1633), the most impor Watch (Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam). -
Gary Schwartz
Gary Schwartz A Corpus of Rembrandt Paintings as a Test Case for Connoisseurship Seldom has an exercise in connoisseurship had more going for it than the world-famous Rembrandt Research Project, the RRP. This group of connoisseurs set out in 1968 to establish a corpus of Rembrandt paintings in which doubt concer- ning attributions to the master was to be reduced to a minimum. In the present enquiry, I examine the main lessons that can be learned about connoisseurship in general from the first three volumes of the project. My remarks are limited to two central issues: the methodology of the RRP and its concept of authorship. Concerning methodology,I arrive at the conclusion that the persistent appli- cation of classical connoisseurship by the RRP, attended by a look at scientific examination techniques, shows that connoisseurship, while opening our eyes to some features of a work of art, closes them to others, at the risk of generating false impressions and incorrect judgments.As for the concept of authorship, I will show that the early RRP entertained an anachronistic and fatally puristic notion of what constitutes authorship in a Dutch painting of the seventeenth century,which skewed nearly all of its attributions. These negative judgments could lead one to blame the RRP for doing an inferior job. But they can also be read in another way. If the members of the RRP were no worse than other connoisseurs, then the failure of their enterprise shows that connoisseurship was unable to deliver the advertised goods. I subscribe to the latter conviction. This paper therefore ends with a proposal for the enrichment of Rembrandt studies after the age of connoisseurship. -
Rembrandt: a Milestone of Portraiture
Artistic Narration: A Peer Reviewed Journal of Visual & Performing Art ISSN (P): 0976-7444 (e): 2395-7247 Vol. VIII. 2016 IMPACT Factor - 3.9651 Rembrandt: a Milestone of Portraiture Syed Ali Jafar Assistant Professor Dept. of Painting, D.S. College, Aligarh. Email: [email protected] Abstract When we talk about portraiture, the name of Dutch painter Rembrandt comes suddenly in our mind who was born in 1607 and studied art in the studio of a well known portrait painter Pieter Lastman in Amsterdam. Soon after learning all the basics of art, young Rembrandt established himself as a portrait painter along with a reputation as an etcher (print maker). As a result, young and energetic Rembrandt established his own studio and began to apprentice budding artist almost his own age. In 1632, Rembrandt married to Saskia van Ulyenburg, a cousin of a well known art dealer who was not in favour of this love marriage. Anyhow after the marriage, Rembrandt was so happy but destiny has written otherwise, his beloved wife Saskia was died just after giving birth to the son Titus. Anyhow same year dejected Rembrandt painted his famous painting „Night Watch‟ which pull down the reputation of the painter because Rembrandt painted it in his favourite dramatic spot light manner which was discarded by the officers who had commissioned the painting. Despite having brilliant qualities of drama, lighting scene and movement, Rembrandt was stopped to obtain the commission works. So he stared to paint nature to console himself. At the same time, Hendrickje Stoffels, a humble woman who cared much to child Titus, married Rembrandt wise fully and devoted her to reduce the tide of Rembrandt‟s misfortune. -
Rembrandt Self Portraits
Rembrandt Self Portraits Born to a family of millers in Leiden, Rembrandt left university at 14 to pursue a career as an artist. The decision turned out to be a good one since after serving his apprenticeship in Amsterdam he was singled out by Constantijn Huygens, the most influential patron in Holland. In 1634 he married Saskia van Uylenburgh. In 1649, following Saskia's death from tuberculosis, Hendrickje Stoffels entered Rembrandt's household and six years later they had a son. Rembrandt's success in his early years was as a portrait painter to the rich denizens of Amsterdam at a time when the city was being transformed from a small nondescript port into the The Night Watch 1642 economic capital of the world. His Rembrandt painted the large painting The Militia Company of Captain Frans Banning Cocq historical and religious paintings also between 1640 and 1642. This picture was called De Nachtwacht by the Dutch and The gave him wide acclaim. Night Watch by Sir Joshua Reynolds because by the 18th century the picture was so dimmed and defaced that it was almost indistinguishable, and it looked quite like a night scene. After it Despite being known as a portrait painter was cleaned, it was discovered to represent broad day—a party of musketeers stepping from a Rembrandt used his talent to push the gloomy courtyard into the blinding sunlight. boundaries of painting. This direction made him unpopular in the later years of The piece was commissioned for the new hall of the Kloveniersdoelen, the musketeer branch of his career as he shifted from being the the civic militia. -
The Seven Deadly SINS
The Seven Deadly SINS BERNARD QUARITCH LTD Index to the Sins Lust Items 1-14 Greed and Gluttony Items 15-23 Sloth Items 24-31 Wrath Items 32-40 Pride and Envy Items 41-51 All Seven Sins Item 52 See final page for payment details. I LUST THE STATISTICS OF DEBAUCHERY 1) [BARNAUD, Nicolas]. Le Cabinet du Roy de France, dans lequel il y a trois perles precieuses d’inestimable valeur: par le moyen desquelles sa Majesté s’en va le premier monarque du monde, & ses sujets du tout soulagez. [No place or printer], 1581. 8vo, pp. [xvi], 647, [11], [2, blank]; lightly browned or spotted in places, the final 6 leaves with small wormholes at inner margins; a very good copy in contemporary vellum with yapp edges; from the library of the Princes of Liechtenstein, with armorial bookplate on front paste- down. £2200 First edition, first issue, of this harsh criticism of the debauched church and rotten nobility and the resulting bad finances of France, anonymously published by a well-travelled Protestant physician, and writer on alchemy who was to become an associate of the reformer Fausto Paolo Sozzini, better known as Socinus, the founder of the reformist school influential in Poland. Barnaud was accused of atheism and excommunicated in 1604. He is one of the real historical figures, on which the Doctor Faustus legend is based. This ‘violent pamphlet against the clergy (translated from Dictionnaire de biographie française) is divided into three books, symbolized by pearls, as mentioned in the title. In the first book Barnaud gives an account and precise numbers of sodomites, illegitimate children, prostitutes etc. -
Evolution and Ambition in the Career of Jan Lievens (1607-1674)
ABSTRACT Title: EVOLUTION AND AMBITION IN THE CAREER OF JAN LIEVENS (1607-1674) Lloyd DeWitt, Ph.D., 2006 Directed By: Prof. Arthur K. Wheelock, Jr. Department of Art History and Archaeology The Dutch artist Jan Lievens (1607-1674) was viewed by his contemporaries as one of the most important artists of his age. Ambitious and self-confident, Lievens assimilated leading trends from Haarlem, Utrecht and Antwerp into a bold and monumental style that he refined during the late 1620s through close artistic interaction with Rembrandt van Rijn in Leiden, climaxing in a competition for a court commission. Lievens’s early Job on the Dung Heap and Raising of Lazarus demonstrate his careful adaptation of style and iconography to both theological and political conditions of his time. This much-discussed phase of Lievens’s life came to an end in 1631when Rembrandt left Leiden. Around 1631-1632 Lievens was transformed by his encounter with Anthony van Dyck, and his ambition to be a court artist led him to follow Van Dyck to London in the spring of 1632. His output of independent works in London was modest and entirely connected to Van Dyck and the English court, thus Lievens almost certainly worked in Van Dyck’s studio. In 1635, Lievens moved to Antwerp and returned to history painting, executing commissions for the Jesuits, and he also broadened his artistic vocabulary by mastering woodcut prints and landscape paintings. After a short and successful stay in Leiden in 1639, Lievens moved to Amsterdam permanently in 1644, and from 1648 until the end of his career was engaged in a string of important and prestigious civic and princely commissions in which he continued to demonstrate his aptitude for adapting to and assimilating the most current style of his day to his own somber monumentality. -
Major Rembrandt Portrait Painting on Loan to the Wadsworth from the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contact: Kim Hugo, (860) 838-4082 [email protected] Image file to accompany publicity of this announcement will be available for download at http://press.thewadsworth.org. Email to request login credentials. Major Rembrandt Portrait Painting on Loan to the Wadsworth from the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam Hartford, Conn. (January 21, 2020)—Rembrandt’s Titus in a Monk’s Habit (1660) is coming to Hartford, Connecticut. On loan from the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam, the painting will be on view at the Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art from February 1 through April 30, 2020. Rembrandt van Rijn (1606–1669), recognized as one of the most important artists of his time and considered by many to be one of the greatest painters in European history, painted his teenage son in the guise of a monk at a crucial moment in his late career when he was revamping his business as a painter and recovering from bankruptcy. It has been fifty-three years since this painting has been on view in the United States making this a rare opportunity for visitors to experience a late portrait by the Dutch master among the collection of Baroque art at the Wadsworth renowned for its standout paintings by Rembrandt’s southern European contemporaries, Zurbarán, Oratio Gentileschi, and Caravaggio. While this painting has been infrequently seen in America, it exemplifies the dramatic use of light and dark to express human emotion for which Rembrandt’s late works are especially prized. “Titus in a Monk’s Habit is an important painting. It opens questions about the artist’s career, his use of traditional subjects, and the bold technique that has won him enduring fame,” says Oliver Tostmann, Susan Morse Hilles Curator of European Art at the Wadsworth. -
Holding the Museum in the Palm of Your Hand Susan Hazan
Holding the Museum in the Palm of your Hand Susan Hazan Introduction: the quintessence of the museum Google Art Project and Europeana: background Transmitting tangibility; the essence of the embodied gallery and the physical object Disseminating intangibility; the descriptive qualities of textural metadata Web 1.0 versus Web 2.0 scenarios Conclusion: the loss and the gain Introduction: the quintessence of the museum When we visit a library or archive, we typically expect to find printed material, books, publications and documents. However, when we go to a museum – either in person or online – we expect a very different kind of experience. The physical museum invites us to discover exceptional and often extraordinary kinds of objects, and accordingly, when these very same objects are delivered online, they are managed very differently from the way books are managed by libraries, or the way that archives manage hierarchal documents. As the footprint of the physical museum, an online museum is therefore orchestrated to convey the singular and often spectacular nature of the objects, as well as the very quintessence of the physical museum. This means that as objects, and works of art make their screen debut, the website needs to communicate not only the physicality of the objects but also to signify - in some way - the embodied space of the gallery. As if we have just passed through the physical front door of the museum, the electronic portal signifies entrance to the online museum, setting up the collections accordingly. Objects are not simply displayed as clutches of atomized objects, but are arranged in thematic order – as a collection or exhibition – according to a chronological logic, historical narrative, provenance, or according to artists or schools of art, just in the same way that they are presented in the physical museum1. -
My Favourite Painting Monty Don a Woman Bathing in a Streamby
Source: Country Life {Main} Edition: Country: UK Date: Wednesday 16, May 2018 Page: 88 Area: 559 sq. cm Circulation: ABC 41314 Weekly Ad data: page rate £3,702.00, scc rate £36.00 Phone: 020 7261 5000 Keyword: Paradise Gardens My favourite painting Monty Don A Woman Bathing in a Stream by Rembrandt Monty Don is a writer, gardener and television presenter. His new book Paradise Gardens is out now, published by Two Roads i My grandfather took me to an art gallery every school holidays and, as my education progressed, we slowly worked our way through the London collections. Rembrandt, he told me, was the greatest artist who had ever lived. I nodded, but was uncertain on what to look for that would confirm that judgement. Then I saw this painting and instantly knew. The subject-almost certainly Rembrandt's common-law wife, Hendrickje Stoffels— is not especially beautiful nor has a body or demeanour that might command especial attention. But, as she lifts the hem of her shift to wade in the water, she is made transcendent by Rembrandt's genius. In this, the simplest of moments by an ordinary person in a painting that is hardly more than a sketch, Rembrandt has captured human love at its most 1 intimate and tender. And there is no A Woman Bathing in a Stream, 1654, by Rembrandt van Rijn (1606-69), 24 /4in 1 more worthy subject than that ? by 18 /2in, National Gallery, London John McEwen comments on^4 Woman Bathing in a Stream Geertje Dircx, Titus's nursemaid, became her church. -
The Meanings of Rembrandt
Gary Schwartz The Meanings of Rembrandt On Friday, 27 October 1797 the National Council of the Batavian Republic (1795–1801), the successor to the Republic of the Seven United Provinces (1581– 1795), voted to accept a present offered to it by the Brabant printmaker Lambertus Antonius Claessens (1763–1834). “The first proof of a labor of three years, being an engraving depicting The Night Watch, un- dertaken in order to make the masterpiece of Rem- brandt, that outstanding painter of the fatherland, better and better known to the Batavian people and other art-loving nations” (figs. 1–2).1 The Council Opposite side: accepted the gift and ordered the maintenance com- Rembrandt Harmensz. mittee to find an appropriate place to hang the work. van Rijn This event had multiple meanings for Rem- Portrait of the Artist brandt’s posterity. Until now his civic guard portrait as Saint Paul (detail), of the company of Frans Banning Cocq had been one 1661 of the six paintings commissioned in the late 1630s for Rijksmuseum, the new hall of the Kloveniers (the musketeers and cepting and acknowledging Claessens’s compliment Amsterdam pikesmen), which since 1715 had hung together in the to the artist as a potent if undervalued representative town hall on Dam Square. Now it was singled out on of Dutch artistic culture in the world at large. Fig. 1 (to the right) its own as an immortal masterpiece, with the nick- The apotheosis had been in the making for thir- From the resolutions name by which it was here called for the first time, the ty years in select circles since the publication in 1767 of the National Council Night Watch. -
Formated Virgin and Child
Artist: Rembrandt Van Rijn Title: The Virgin and Child with Cat and Snake Barstch Number: B063 Date: 1654 Medium: Etching on paper Size: 9.5 cm (3.7 in) x 14.5 cm (5.7 in) Rembrandt’s Etching Technique Rembrandt used copper and burin like other artists use pen and paper: etching was his way to sketch. Rembrandt ignored the fact that the image on the plate is reversed when completed. He was more concerned with quality than accuracy. He paid more attention to capturing light, shadow and depth. Contextual Information This image shows a scene of maternal affection between mother and child, arguably one of the most well known and well used images in art history. This etching is a powerful piece of Christian symbolism. The cat on the left, playing with the Virgin’s hem, is a symbol of laziness, while the snake on the right, slithering out from under the Virgin’s dress, is a symbol of trickery. The Virgin is actually shown with her foot on the snake, symbolizing her role as the new Eve, and thus as someone who will triumph over the Christian concept of original sin. She holds her child as if to shield him from the dangers of the world, knowing that he will meet a brutal death. Joseph looks in from outside the window. He is the husband of Mary, but not the father of Christ. His placement outside the window symbolizes that separation. The glass window above the Virgin’s head makes a halo, signifying her divinity as a holy mother. -
2020 Archived Version
Elderly Man ca. 1630 oil on panel Leiden School 50.9 x 40.6 cm (Leiden 1613 – 1675 Leiden) GD-109 © 2020 The Leiden Collection Elderly Man Page 2 of 9 How to cite Rahusen, Henriette. “Elderly Man” (2017). In The Leiden Collection Catalogue, 2nd ed. Edited by Arthur K. Wheelock Jr. New York, 2017–20. https://theleidencollection.com/artwork/an-elderly-man/ (archived May 2020). A PDF of every version of this entry is available in this Online Catalogue's Archive, and the Archive is managed by a permanent URL. New versions are added only when a substantive change to the narrative occurs. © 2020 The Leiden Collection Elderly Man Page 3 of 9 Seen in profile, the elderly man seems lost in thought as he gazes quietly Comparative Figures downward in a pose echoing the sloped shape of his left shoulder. Intense light reflecting off the sitter’s bald head helps draw attention to his finely rendered and precisely articulated features. No attributes identify the sitter, who wears a softly-rendered reddish-brown woolen cloak that covers a simple white shirt visible at the neck. The painting is, in fact, a character study, or tronie, probably done from life, rather than a commissioned portrait. In many respects the clarity of modeling in this well-preserved panel painting is similar to that seen in works by Gerrit Dou from the early to mid-1630s. Nevertheless, Dou’s painterly techniques are more nuanced than those evident in this work, as can be seen in a comparison with Fig 1. Gerrit Dou, Astronomer Dou’s Astronomer (Heraclitus?), ca.