DOCSLIB.ORG

Councillor Submissions to the Lincolnshire County Council Electoral Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Councillor Submissions to the Lincolnshire County Council Electoral Review Councillor submissions to the Lincolnshire County Council electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from Councillors. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 2 Lincolnshire County Personal Details: Name: Mark Allan E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Lincolnshire County Council Comment text: Dear LGBCE, As the County Councillor for the Sleaford Division, I have the following comments to make on the proposed boundary changes that affect the Division that I represent a LCC and Sleaford Town: 1. The splitting of the cohesive urban Sleaford Holdingham Ward into two arbitrary new Wards to provide appropriate nos of electors – presumably primarily for the new LCC Ruskington and Cranwell Division - is entirely counter to the “A good pattern of divisions” criteria that LGBCE indicate that they are aiming to achieve. A split of the form proposed does not satisfy any of the community identity ones and, indeed, appears counter to all of them. 2. The creation of a new single Sleaford and Quarrington and Mareham Ward and its allocation to the new Sleaford Rural LCC Division is again contrary to the Community Identity criteria but more importantly creates dire local democracy issues at a Town Council election level. The consequences of what is proposed with a single Sleaford and Quarrington Ward – rather than the current Sleaford Quarrington and Mareham Wards – with the proposed 8 Town Councillors means that each TCllr will represent an electorate of around 5,500 and at elections, if considering standing as an independent, will find the cost and campaigning implications too great to go forward. The only candidates that could consider campaigning in a single Ward of this size will be those with a Political Party backing. This new Ward must be split into two - Sleaford Quarrington and Sleaford Mareham, as it is now and for the same good reasons that it is split into two now. 4/5 TCllrs should be allocated to Sleaford Quarrington and 3TCllrs to Sleaford Mareham. This will not affect the proposed LCC Divisional arrangements for Sleaford Rural but will address what will otherwise create a significant local democracy issue. 3. It seems entirely obtuse that only 2 TCllrs (a loss of one) are proposed in Sleaford Westholme (electorate 1,845) whilst 2 TCllrs are proposed for Sleaford Holdingham (electorate 1,000), 3 TCllrs remain in Sleaford Navigation ( a similar electorate at 1,873) whilst 8 TCllrs are proposed for Sleaford Quarrington and Mareham (electorate 5,374) (but see the comment in para 2 above ). Either Sleaford Westholme is being hard done by or Sleaford Holdingham and Sleaford Quarrington and Mareham is being too favoured. It is clear that Sleaford Holdingham and Sleaford Moor Should be joined for Town Council elcections, as they will be for a District Council election, returning 3 TCllrs. The T Cllr arrangements should be based on the current boundaries and clearly can be so irrespective of the changes being proposed for the LCC divisions: Sleaford Quarrington – 4 Sleaford Mareham - 3 Sleaford Westolme – 3 Sleaford Castle – 2 Sleaford Navigation -3 Sleaford Holdingham and Moor – 3 4. The proposed boundary changes should deal with a long standing issue in Sleaford. A significant part of the town’s population on the eastern side of the town and a part of urban Sleaford are only some 4/500m from the town centre and clearly use all of the town’s facilities yet are placed in the Kirby- la - Thorpe Parish area with some half mile of rural space between this part of urban Sleaford and Kirby- la -Thorpe village. This part of Sleaford is closer to the Town centre and its amenities than most other areas of the town and t is completely wrong that they are attached to a rural parish. Yours sincerely, Cllr Mark Allan County Councillor for the Sleaford Division Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/7430 09/02/2016 Mayers, Mishka From: mark allan Sent: 07 February 2016 15:47 To: reviews Subject: FW: Lincolnshire boundary review Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Local Government Boundary Commission for England 14th Floor Millbank Tower Millbank London SW1P 4QP 06.02.2016 Dear Sirs, Re: ELECTORAL REVIEW OF LINCOLNSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL; DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The splitting of the cohesive urban Sleaford Holdingham Ward into two arbitrary new Wards to provide appropriate nos of electors – presumably primarily for the new LCC Ruskington and Cranwell Division ‐ is entirely counter to the “A good pattern of divisions” criteria that LGBCE indicate that they are aiming to achieve. A split of the form proposed does not satisfy any of the community identity ones and, indeed, appears counter to all of them. 2. The creation of a new single Sleaford and Quarrington and Mareham Ward and its allocation to the new Sleaford Rural LCC Division is again contrary to the Community Identity criteria but more importantly creates dire local democracy issues at a Town Council election level. The consequences of what is proposed with a single Sleaford and Quarrington Ward – rather than the current Sleaford Quarrington and Mareham Wards – with the proposed 8 Town Councillors means that each TCllr will represent an electorate of around 5,500 and at elections, if considering standing as an independent, will find the cost and campaigning implications too great to go forward. The only candidates that could consider campaigning in a single Ward of this size will be those with a Political Party backing. This new Ward must be split into two ‐Sleaford Quarrington and Sleaford Mareham, as it is now and for the same good reasons that it is split into two now. 4/5 TCllrs should be allocated to Sleaford Quarrington and 3TCllrs to Sleaford Mareham. This will not affect the proposed LCC Divisional arrangements for Sleaford Rural but will address what will otherwise create a significant local democracy issue. 3. It seems entirely obtuse that only 2 TCllrs (a loss of one) are proposed in Sleaford Westholme (electorate 1,845) whilst 2 TCllrs are proposed for Sleaford Holdingham (electorate 1,000), 3 TCllrs remain in Sleaford 1 Navigation (a similar electorate at 1,873) whilst 8 TCllrs are proposed for Sleaford Quarrington and Mareham (electorate 5,374) (but see the comment in para 2 above). Either Sleaford Westholme is being hard done by or Sleaford Holdingham and Sleaford Quarrington and Mareham is being too favoured. It is clear that Sleaford Holdingham and Sleaford Moor Should be joined for Town Council elcections, as they will be for a District Council election, returning 3 TCllrs. The T Cllr arrangements should be based on the current boundaries and clearly can be so irrespective of the changes being proposed for the LCC divisions: Sleaford Quarrington – 4 Sleaford Mareham ‐ 3 Sleaford Westolme – 3 Sleaford Castle – 2 Sleaford Navigation ‐3 Sleaford Holdingham and Moor – 3 4. The proposed boundary changes should deal with a long standing issue in Sleaford. A significant part of the town’s population on the eastern side of the town and clearly a part of urban Sleaford is only some 400 to 500m from the town centre. The residents of this area clearly use all of the town’s facilities yet are placed in the Kirby‐ la ‐Thorpe Parish area with some half mile of rural space between this part of urban Sleaford and Kirby‐ la ‐Thorpe village. This part of Sleaford is closer to the Town centre and its amenities than most other areas of the town – other parts of Sleaford in the own boundary area are 4 to 5 kilometres away from the town. It is completely wrong and against all the criteria being used or the review that this part of Sleaford is not a part of the town and is attached to a rural parish. The Town Council boundary needs extending to the east to include this urban part of Sleaford that has now existed for 20+ years and which is clearly a part of the Town and which would more clearly satisfy the Community Identity criteria set out by LGBCE that sits behind the boundary review. Yours Sincerely Mark Allan County Councillor Mark Allan Lincolnshire County Council, Sleaford Division 2 Consultation re Boundary changes for Lincolnshire County Council Response re Boston Borough divisions by Cllr Alison Austin I would have preferred that the number of councillors representing the Borough of Boston had remained at 7, because of the sizeable “hidden” electorate within the Borough who have not engaged with the electoral system and failed to register. This is in the main due to the large number of migrants from Eastern European countries now resident in Boston, many of whom do not speak English well but in particular live in rented accommodation and move frequently. As a Borough Councillor I am well aware of the number of properties within my ward at which there are no registered electors, but most of which contain at least two adults from EU countries. I recognise that this is a matter for Boston Borough Council to resolve but these “hidden” residents and their families require the time of a councillor and put great demand on council services, just as much as those who are registered. I accept that in the light of the overall reduction in the number of Councillors at the County Council, the number must reduce to 6. I am happy with the actual boundaries of the 6 (six) proposed divisions but wish to object strongly to their naming by the Boundary commission. My argument is set out below: Overall there appears to have been arbitrary selection of communities within the divisions to form their names.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Substantial 5 Bedroom Stone House in Sought-After Village
    SUBSTANTIAL 5 BEDROOM STONE HOUSE IN SOUGHT-AFTER VILLAGE THE OLD GREEN FARM NORTH LANE, NAVENBY, LN5 0EH SUBSTANTIAL 5 BEDROOM STONE HOUSE IN SOUGHT- AFTER VILLAGE. THE OLD GREEN FARM NORTH LANE, NAVENBY, LN5 0EH RInner porch w entrance hall w staircase w sitting room games room w snug w study w dining room w WC w utility room kitchen w 5 bedrooms (3 en-suite) w family bathroom w single garage w triple open-fronted garage w brick barn w garden room w EPC rating = E Directions From Lincoln take the A607 south towards Grantham passing through the village of Waddington. On entering Navenby take the first right hand turn onto North Lane. Green Farm is at the end of the cul-de-sac on the right hand side. Entry is through a double five bar gate. Situation Navenby lies approximately 8 miles south of the historical city of Lincoln and is a highly desirable village with a good selection of independent shops including antique centre, bespoke interior furnishings, café, two pubs and awarding winning butcher/bakery. There is also a medical centre, Co-op store, Post Office and primary school. The village is ideally located for commuting north to Lincoln or south to Grantham which has road links to the A1 and mainline rail to London (Kings Cross from 70 minutes). Description Old Green Farm is a stunning five bedroom stone house extended around a mid 19th century barn. The property is set in about 0.8 acre and enjoys an elevated position with far reaching views across farmland towards the Trent valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Belton Setting Study
    Belton House and Park Setting Study and Policy Development South Kesteven District Council and National Trust January 2010 Belton House and Park Setting Study and Policy Development Final 10.01.10 Notice This report was produced by Atkins Ltd for South Kesteven District Council and The National Trust for the specific purpose of supporting the development of policy for the setting of Belton House and Park. This report may not be used by any person other than South Kesteven District Council and The National Trust without South Kesteven District Council’s and The National Trust’s express permission. In any event, Atkins accepts no liability for any costs, liabilities or losses arising as a result of the use of or reliance upon the contents of this report by any person other than South Kesteven District Council and The National Trust. Document History JOB NUMBER: 50780778 DOCUMENT REF: Belton Final September 2009 (revised).doc 4 Final (typographic KS/JB/CF KS AC AC 10/01/10 corrections) 3 Final KS/JB/CF KS AC AC 29/09/09 2 Final Draft KS/JB/CF KS AC AC 17/6/09 1 1st full draft for client KS/JB/CF KS AC AC 3/4/09 discussion Revision Purpose Description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date 50780778/Belton Final Final Jan 2010 (revised).doc Contents Section Page 1. INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 Purpose & Scope of the Study 4 1.2 The National Trust Belton House Estate 4 1.3 Structure of the Report 4 1.4 Method 5 1.5 Planning Background 6 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 I.01: DEPARTMENT for TRANSPORT (DFT) ROAD INVESTMENT STRATEGY (2014) Road Investment Strategy: Overview
    Appendix 1 I.01: DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT (DFT) ROAD INVESTMENT STRATEGY (2014) Road Investment Strategy: Overview December 2014 Road Investment Strategy: Overview December 2014 The Department for Transport has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the Department’s website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact the Department. Department for Transport Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR Telephone 0300 330 3000 Website www.gov.uk/dft General enquiries https://forms.dft.gov.uk ISBN: 978-1-84864-148-8 © Crown copyright 2014 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. You may re-use this information (not including logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Photographic acknowledgements Alamy: Cover Contents 3 Contents Foreword 5 The Strategic Road Network 8 The challenges 9 The Strategic Vision 10 The Investment Plan 13 The Performance Specification 22 Transforming our roads 26 Appendices: regional profiles 27 The Road Investment Strategy suite of documents (Strategic Vision, Investment Plan, Performance Specification, and this Overview) are intended to fulfil the requirements of Clause 3 of the Infrastructure Bill 2015 for the 2015/16 – 2019/20 Road Period.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Borough Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
    Water Boston Borough Council October 2010 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Water Boston Borough Council October 2010 Prepared by: ................................ Checked by: .............................. Roy Lobley Richard Ramsden Associate Director Senior Engineer Approved by: ........................... Andy Yarde Regional Director Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Rev No Comments Checked by Approved Date by 1 Final to client RR AY April 2011 5th Floor, 2 City Walk, Leeds, LS11 9AR Telephone: 0113 391 6800 Website: http://www.aecom.com Job No 60034187 Reference RE01 Date Created October 2010 This document is confidential and the copyright of AECOM Limited. Any unauthorised reproduction or usage by any person other than the addressee is strictly prohibited. f:\projects\50016i boston sfra (revision)\reports\boston sfra final march11.docx Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 2 Development Planning...................................................................................................................................................... 9 East Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Adopted Central Lincolnshire Local Plan
    CENTRAL LINCOLNSHIRE Local Plan Adopted April 2017 Central Lincolnshire | Local Plan - Adopted April 2017 Foreword Ensuring a flourishing future for Central Lincolnshire Central Lincolnshire is characterised by its diverse and enticing landscape. The magnificent city of Lincoln is embedded within our beautiful landscape and is surrounded by a network of picturesque towns and villages: these places, along with the social and economic opportunities in the area, make Central Lincolnshire a fantastic place to live, work and visit. But there is so much potential to make Central Lincolnshire an even better place. An even better place to live, with quality homes people can afford, easier access to shops, services and facilities, and new thriving communities, which are welcoming and safe. An even better place to work, where new facilities and infrastructure mean that businesses choose to expand or relocate here, bringing jobs and stimulating investment. An even better place to visit, a place where people choose to come to enjoy our nature, our history, our shops, our eateries and attractions, while at the same time significantly contributing to our rural and urban economies. A new Local Plan for Central Lincolnshire can do this. This is the adopted Local Plan for Central Lincolnshire. It was prepared with the benefit of your very helpful comments we received at various draft stages. Inside this adopted Local Plan are policies for the growth and regeneration of Central Lincolnshire over the next 20 years and beyond, including sites allocated for development and other areas designated for protection. The policies within the Local Plan will make sure that our settlements grow in the right way, ensure we have homes and employment where we need them, and ensure our new communities are sustainable, accessible and inclusive.
    [Show full text]
  • QUARRINGTON Sleaford, NG34 8UR OUTLINE PLANNING PERMISSION for 1,450 HOUSES PLUS ANCILLARY COMMUNITY USES
    MAJOR SERVICED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY QUARRINGTON Sleaford, NG34 8UR OUTLINE PLANNING PERMISSION FOR 1,450 HOUSES PLUS ANCILLARY COMMUNITY USES Illustrative Master Plan Key Highlights • Accessible location, within 1km (circa 0.6 • Parcel sales available from 50 units plus miles) for Sleaford Town Centre • Coop Local Centre committed and due to • Fully Serviced Site open in August 2019 SAVILLS NOTTINGHAM Enfield Chambers 18 Low Pavement Nottingham NG1 7DG +44 (0) 115 934 8000 savills.co.uk Introduction This SUE creates a new community south of Quarrington Our Client has the vision and expertise to deliver the and has planning consent for the following: infrastructure and supporting facilities on this Site to facilitate this development. • 1,450 dwellings Sleaford Property Developments Limited has already • Local centre incorporating 5 retail units with offices, entered into a joint venture with T. Balfe Construction healthcare, nursery, community centre and public Limited to develop the first phase of dwellings house comprising up to 45 • Care home scheme units creating an impressive gateway into the Site of executive and core market housing. • Two form primary school The Landowner is well progressed with an established • Open space housebuilder looking to deliver 420 units to the south of • Sports pitches the scheme. • Allotments Additional serviced parcels are available providing for 50 plots plus. CGI of the proposed street scene for Key Phase 1 below: Actual images of the first phase of development: SAVILLS NOTTINGHAM Enfield Chambers 18 Low Pavement Nottingham NG1 7DG +44 (0) 115 934 8000 savills.co.uk Location Plan detailing the Site’s proximity to Sleaford Town Centre and main arterial routes: Location Sleaford Property Developments Limited owns 60 Lincoln and Peterborough.
    [Show full text]
  • Tackling High Risk Regional Roads Safer Roads Fund Full
    Mobility • Safety • Economy • Environment Tackling High-Risk Regional Roads Safer Roads Fund 2017/2018 FO UND Dr Suzy Charman Road Safety Foundation October 2018 AT ION The Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring Ltd is a transport policy and research organisation which explores the economic, mobility, safety and environmental issues relating to roads and their users. The Foundation publishes independent and authoritative research with which it promotes informed debate and advocates policy in the interest of the responsible motorist. RAC Foundation 89–91 Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HS Tel no: 020 7747 3445 www.racfoundation.org Registered Charity No. 1002705 October 2018 © Copyright Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring Ltd Mobility • Safety • Economy • Environment Tackling High-Risk Regional Roads Safer Roads Fund 2017/2018 FO UND Dr Suzy Charman Road Safety Foundation October 2018 AT ION About the Road Safety Foundation The Road Safety Foundation is a UK charity advocating road casualty reduction through simultaneous action on all three components of the safe road system: roads, vehicles and behaviour. The charity has enabled work across each of these components and has published several reports which have provided the basis of new legislation, government policy or practice. For the last decade, the charity has focused on developing the Safe Systems approach, and in particular leading the establishment of the European Road Assessment Programme (EuroRAP) in the UK and, through EuroRAP, the global UK-based charity International Road Assessment Programme (iRAP). Since the inception of EuroRAP in 1999, the Foundation has been the UK member responsible for managing the programme in the UK (and, more recently, Ireland), ensuring that these countries provide a global model of what can be achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Grantham Southern Quadrant
    Project Promoters: Buckminster Estates, Grantham Lincolnshire County Council, South Kesteven District Council Southern Quadrant Scale: Lincolnshire £200m+ GDV Sector: Opportunity Mixed use of Housing and Retail An opportunity to shape the delivery of the project at an early stage, with a range of direct developer Location: and investment options including development Grantham, Lincolnshire partner/investor and forward funding for identified occupiers. Investment Type: Development partner/investor; An ambitious project to deliver a high quality, forward funding for identified sustainable development of new homes, employment occupiers and retail space stretching from the A1 eastwards around the southern side of the town of Grantham. The Planning Status: opportunity is focussed on the new Garden Village of Allocated in the local plan Spitalgate Heath, one of only fourteen designated by the Government, and a Designer Outlet Village which has www.southkesteven.gov.uk recently been approved through planning. Overview With planning permissions for the employment land and construction of the road infrastructure having been granted Background and decisions to grant consent for the retail Grantham is the largest town in South space and residential properties in place the Kesteven District and is a sub-regionally development opportunities are becoming significant centre with excellent transport immediately investable. links to London and Nottingham. The Existing schemes are in the final stages Southern Quadrant to the south of the of the planning process with further site town is the largest of the development allocations coming forward through the sites identified in the Councils Core South Kesteven Local Plan creating longer Strategy. term investment opportunities The development of the Southern Quadrant The approximate number of units for each will deliver a sustainable new community in phase is: a high quality landscape setting, providing much needed new homes and jobs whilst • Phase 1: 1,212 homes including contributing to the wider regeneration of c.
    [Show full text]
  • Join the Conservative Business Breakfast Club
    JOIN THE CONSERVATIVE BUSINESS BREAKFAST CLUB Everyone in Britain depends on thriving Conservative Party to join the Club, although businesses to create jobs and generate the we hope that you will consider joining the tax revenues that pay for schools, hospitals, Party and help us deliver the change Britain roads, our Armed Forces and the Police. Your needs to encourage growth, jobs and the hard work keeps this country going. economy. The Conservative Business Breakfast Club Annual membership costs £60 per annum has been set up to provide a forum in which or £5 per month. Members are welcome to individuals and businesses within the bring guests who will be charged £16 per Grantham and Stamford Constituency can person for breakfast. discuss the challenges they face with Nick Boles, The Conservative Member of Parliament for Grantham and Stamford. The Club meets for breakfast three times a year and on occasion, Nick will be joined by an outside speaker - a fellow politician, business journalist or successful business leader. How to join us: Complete the form overleaf and send it to us: GSCA You do not need to be a member of the NORTH STREET BOURNE LINCOLNSHIRE PE10 9AJ Call us on 01778 421498 Email: [email protected] TO JOIN US PLEASE FILL IN THE FORM BELOW Join the Conservative Business Breakfast Club, Renew my Membership of the Conservative £60 per annum or £5 per month Business Breakfast Club. YOUR PERSONAL DETAILS Name Email Title Date of - - Home no birth D D M M Y Y Y Y Address Business Name Have you been
    [Show full text]
  • Lincolnshirk
    DIRECTORY.] LINCOLNSHIRK skeletons, each accompanied by a shield, knife and spear a(terwards Earl of Bristol, and thus transfelTed it to that head, all of which were in good preservation, the remains of family. The Marquess of Bristol is lord of the manor and the wooden shafts of the spears being still more or less owner of the principal part of the land. chstinctly visible ; a brass- coin of Valentinianus was also The area of the entire parish of New Sleaford is 3, r6o found, bearing a figure of Victory, and the legend 1' Securi­ &eras; rateable value, £14,50"'; the population in 1881 was tas Reipublicre." -of the township, 3,955 ; of the parish, 4,075, including i51 Sir John Hussey kt. 'first and only Baron Hussey, of Slea• officers and inmates in the workhouse ; and of the local board ford, who was beheaded at Lincoln, in 1537, for high treason, district, 4,9651 viz. ~ Holdingham, 120; New Sleaford, 3,955; possessed a house at Sleaford, called the Old Place, in which Old Sleaford, 526 ; and Quarrington, 364. Henry VIII. when on his progress towards York to meet the Parish Clerk, Robert Bennett Graharp.. King of Scotland, passed the night ; a modern building now occnpi~ the site on which this house stood. HoLDINGHAM, anciently "Haldingham," is a township in The Black Bull inn, in Southgate retains its ancient sign this parish, on the road to Lincoln, and was not improbably built into the wall, and representing a bull being baited, the birthplace of Richard de Haldingham {c. 125o-6o), who executed the famous "Mappa Mundi," now preserved in 'With the date" 1689," and the initials "RBM," and below, Hereford Cathedral.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Recommendations Report for North Kesteven District Council
    New electoral arrangements for North Kesteven District Council Draft Recommendations August 2020 Translations and other formats: To get this report in another language or in a large-print or Braille version, please contact the Local Government Boundary Commission for England at: Tel: 0330 500 1525 Email: [email protected] Licensing: The mapping in this report is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. Licence Number: GD 100049926 2020 A note on our mapping: The maps shown in this report are for illustrative purposes only. Whilst best efforts have been made by our staff to ensure that the maps included in this report are representative of the boundaries described by the text, there may be slight variations between these maps and the large PDF map that accompanies this report, or the digital mapping supplied on our consultation portal. This is due to the way in which the final mapped products are produced. The reader should therefore refer to either the large PDF supplied with this report or the digital mapping for the true likeness of the boundaries intended. The boundaries as shown on either the large PDF map or the digital mapping should always appear identical. Contents Introduction 1 Who we are and what we do 1 What is an electoral review? 1 Why North Kesteven? 2 Our proposals for North Kesteven 2 How will the recommendations affect you? 2 Have your
    [Show full text]
  • Map Referred to in the North Kesteven (Electoral Changes) Order 2021 KEY to PARISH WARDS Sheet 1 of 1 NORTH HYKEHAM CP
    SHEET 1, MAP 1 Map referred to in the North Kesteven (Electoral Changes) Order 2021 KEY TO PARISH WARDS Sheet 1 of 1 NORTH HYKEHAM CP A NORTH HYKEHAM FORUM Boundary alignment and names shown on the mapping background B NORTH HYKEHAM GRANGE may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest boundary information C NORTH HYKEHAM MEADOW applied as part of this review. D NORTH HYKEHAM MEMORIAL E NORTH HYKEHAM MOOR F NORTH HYKEHAM WITHAM This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. SLEAFORD CP Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2021. G SLEAFORD CASTLE H SLEAFORD HOLDINGHAM I SLEAFORD NAVIGATION J SLEAFORD QUARRINGTON K SLEAFORD WESTHOLME SKELLINGTHORPE CP WASHINGBOROUGH CP HEIGHINGTON & HEIGHINGTON CP DODDINGTON WASHINGBOROUGH AND WHISBY CP CANWICK CP SKELLINGTHORPE & EAGLE BRANSTON AND MERE CP HYKEHAM BRACEBRIDGE HEATH NORTH MEMORIAL A BRANSTON SCARLE CP EAGLE AND NORTH BRACEBRIDGE SWINETHORPE CP HYKEHAM CP HEATH CP POTTER HANWORTH CP D HYKEHAM E CENTRAL F B THORPE ON THE C NOCTON CP HILL CP WADDINGTON CP HYKEHAM FOSSE WITHAM ST HUGHS SOUTH & SWINDERBY HYKEHAM CP METHERINGHAM RURAL DUNSTON CP SWINDERBY CP WADDINGTON RURAL AUBOURN WITH HADDINGTON CP HARMSTON CP METHERINGHAM CP WITHAM ST HUGHS CP BLANKNEY CP THURLBY CP COLEBY CP MARTIN CP NORTON DISNEY CP BASSINGHAM CP BASSINGHAM BOOTHBY TIMBERLAND CP RURAL GRAFFOE CP
    [Show full text]