Consensus-Based Clinical Practice Recommendations for the Examination and Management of Falls in Patients with Parkinson’S Diseaseq

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Consensus-Based Clinical Practice Recommendations for the Examination and Management of Falls in Patients with Parkinson’S Diseaseq Parkinsonism and Related Disorders 20 (2014) 360e369 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Parkinsonism and Related Disorders journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/parkreldis Editor’s comment: In this thoughtful and provocative Point-of-View contribution, van der Eijk and colleagues address the shortcomings of the classical model of “professional physician-centered care” and describe an alternative “collaborative patient-centered care” approach that involves, among many other things, shared decision making with patients in the context of a multidisciplinary care setting. They propose that this alternative approach may improve quality of care and produce better outcomes for individuals with disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, while also being cost-effective. The authors discuss their experience with such an approach and describe both the benefits and barriers they have encountered. Whether one agrees or disagrees with the authors’ proposals, this article will provide much food for thought and reflection. Ronald F. Pfeiffer, Editor-in-Chief Department of Neurology, University of Tennessee HSC, 855 Monroe Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, USA Point of view Consensus-based clinical practice recommendations for the examination and management of falls in patients with Parkinson’s diseaseq Marjolein A. van der Marck a, Margit Ph.C. Klok a, Michael S. Okun b, Nir Giladi c, Marten Munneke a,d, Bastiaan R. Bloem e,*, on behalf of the NPF Falls Task Force1 a Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen Centre for Evidence Based Practice, Department of Neurology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands b University of Florida Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Gainesville, FL, USA c Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel d Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen Centre for Evidence Based Practice, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands e Radboud university medical center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Department of Neurology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands article info abstract Article history: Falls in Parkinson’s disease (PD) are common and frequently devastating. Falls prevention is an urgent Received 28 December 2012 priority, but there is no accepted program that specifically addresses the risk profile in PD. Therefore, we Received in revised form aimed to provide consensus-based clinical practice recommendations that systematically address po- 13 September 2013 tential fall risk factors in PD. We developed an overview of both generic (age-related) and PD-specific Accepted 2 October 2013 factors. For each factor, we specified: best method of ascertainment; disciplines that should be involved in assessment and treatment; and which interventions could be engaged. Using a web-based Keywords: tool, we asked 27 clinically active professionals from multiple relevant disciplines to evaluate this Parkinson’s disease Accidental falls overview. The revised version was subsequently reviewed by 12 experts. Risk factors and their associated fi Prevention interventions were included in the nal set of recommendations when at least 66% of reviewing experts Clinical protocol agreed. These recommendations included 31 risk factors. Nearly all required a multidisciplinary team approach, usually involving a neurologist and PD-nurse specialist. Finally, the expert panel proposed to first identify the specific fall type and to tailor screening and treatment accordingly. A routine evaluation of all risk factors remains reserved for high-risk patients without prior falls, or for patients with seem- ingly unexplained falls. In conclusion, this project produced a set of consensus-based clinical practice recommendations for the examination and management of falls in PD. These may be used in two ways: for pragmatic use in current clinical practice, pending further evidence; and as the active intervention in clinical trials, aiming to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of large scale implementation. Ó 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.10.028. q This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). * Corresponding author. Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud university medical center PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nij- megen, The Netherlands. E-mail address: [email protected] (B.R. Bloem). 1 Listed at the end of the manuscript. 1353-8020/$ e see front matter Ó 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.10.030 M.A. van der Marck et al. / Parkinsonism and Related Disorders 20 (2014) 360e369 361 1. Introduction severity of each risk factor); which disciplines should be involved in the assessment and treatment; the primarily responsible disci- Falls in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) are common and pline; and suggestions for therapeutic interventions to reduce or often devastating. Prospective surveys have revealed high rates of eliminate the risk factor. falls that exceed those of the community-dwelling elderly. A meta- analysis concluded that the risk of sustaining a fall was consider- 2.2. Multidisciplinary evaluation of the concept recommendations ably increased in moderately affected patients with PD as compared with healthy age-matched peers. Almost 50% of patients fell during The concept recommendations were presented via a web-based a brief follow-up of only 3 months [1]. tool to a group of 27 professionals from multiple disciplines that Falls in PD are associated with a poor prognosis. Injuries are were recruited from National Parkinson Foundation (NPF) centers common, and patients with PD with hip fractures face high (Fig. 1). These professionals evaluated the recommendations, gave morbidity and mortality [2]. Minor injuries such as bruises or lac- additional suggestions, and rated their level of expertise with each erations are even more common [3]. Moreover, the disease appears risk factor. If they rated their expertise as ‘none’ in any category, to become more severe and difficult to treat once falls are present, their scores were not considered. Subsequently, the revised rec- usually because of fall-related injuries and cognitive dysfunction, ommendations were reviewed by 12 international experts from and overall survival of fallers is reduced [4]. Falls also commonly multiple relevant disciplines (Falls Task Force group; Fig. 1). These induce a fear of renewed falls [3], which can lead to secondary experts were selected for their specialization and research experi- immobilization and a reduction in general fitness, thereby ence in balance, gait and falls in PD. For each item, agreement be- increasing the risk of cardiovascular disease [5]. Lack of physical tween at least two-thirds of these experts was considered as activity is also associated with constipation, pressure sores, consensus. Therapeutic interventions were scored on a 6-point insomnia and osteoporosis (which further increases fracture risk) scale, ranging from 0 (totally unimportant) to 5 (extremely [6]. Immobility also deprives patients of their independence and important). Interventions with a mean evaluation score of >2were social interactions. Not surprisingly, falls and mobility problems included as final recommendations. have been associated with poorer quality of life. [7e9] In addition, the economic burden of falls in PD is substantial, due to the rela- 2.3. Implementation of the protocol in clinical practice tively high cost of treatment of injuries and nursing home admis- sions [10]. Two possible ways to implement the recommendations in These potentially serious implications, make the prevention of clinical practice were offered to the panel of 12 experts. Option A falls a high priority in the management of patients with PD. How- was a ‘One size fits all approach’ where all patients should be ever, there is no accepted falls prevention program tailored spe- reviewed for all risk factors, and be treated accordingly. This cifically to the problems encountered in individual patients with approach is comprehensive and ascertains that all risk factors will PD. We therefore developed falls prevention recommendations be addressed, but might lead to “over-care” in a subset of patients. specifically for PD, based on consensus among various health pro- Option B was the ‘Fall type approach’ where the first diagnostic step fessionals and a smaller panel of experts on falls in PD. The starting is to identify the specific fall type for each patient (e.g., falls that are point was based on the premise that falls in PD are typically always caused by freezing of gait, or falls that are consistently multifactorial, resulting not only from various disease-specific preceded by syncope). For those patients with a clear and identi- mechanisms (e.g. freezing of gait) [11], but also from generic age- fiable fall pattern, the diagnostic and therapeutic approach could be related risk factors [12]. Indeed, older patients with PD are not limited to those specific risk factors and no unnecessary disciplines exempt from age-related processes or problems common to any will be addressed. This provides a specialized approach, but carries geriatric population, such as complex co-morbidity or poly- the risk of under-treatment and missing of unidentified additional pharmacy.
Recommended publications
  • The Brain That Changes Itself
    The Brain That Changes Itself Stories of Personal Triumph from the Frontiers of Brain Science NORMAN DOIDGE, M.D. For Eugene L. Goldberg, M.D., because you said you might like to read it Contents 1 A Woman Perpetually Falling . Rescued by the Man Who Discovered the Plasticity of Our Senses 2 Building Herself a Better Brain A Woman Labeled "Retarded" Discovers How to Heal Herself 3 Redesigning the Brain A Scientist Changes Brains to Sharpen Perception and Memory, Increase Speed of Thought, and Heal Learning Problems 4 Acquiring Tastes and Loves What Neuroplasticity Teaches Us About Sexual Attraction and Love 5 Midnight Resurrections Stroke Victims Learn to Move and Speak Again 6 Brain Lock Unlocked Using Plasticity to Stop Worries, OPsessions, Compulsions, and Bad Habits 7 Pain The Dark Side of Plasticity 8 Imagination How Thinking Makes It So 9 Turning Our Ghosts into Ancestors Psychoanalysis as a Neuroplastic Therapy 10 Rejuvenation The Discovery of the Neuronal Stem Cell and Lessons for Preserving Our Brains 11 More than the Sum of Her Parts A Woman Shows Us How Radically Plastic the Brain Can Be Appendix 1 The Culturally Modified Brain Appendix 2 Plasticity and the Idea of Progress Note to the Reader All the names of people who have undergone neuroplastic transformations are real, except in the few places indicated, and in the cases of children and their families. The Notes and References section at the end of the book includes comments on both the chapters and the appendices. Preface This book is about the revolutionary discovery that the human brain can change itself, as told through the stories of the scientists, doctors, and patients who have together brought about these astonishing transformations.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation Guide for Older Adult Clinical Fall Prevention Programs
    CDC STEADI: Evaluation Guide for Older Adult Clinical Fall Prevention Programs Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths & Injuries www.cdc.gov/steadi CDC STEADI: EVALUATION GUIDE FOR OLDER ADULT CLINICAL FALL PREVENTION PROGRAMS | 2019 2 CDC STEADI: EVALUATION GUIDE FOR OLDER ADULT CLINICAL FALL PREVENTION PROGRAMS | 2019 CDC STEADI: Evaluation Guide for Older Adult Clinical Fall Prevention Programs By 1 1,2 Gwen Bergen, PhD, MPH, and Iju Shakya, MPH 1Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia 2Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) fellow to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2019 3 CDC STEADI: EVALUATION GUIDE FOR OLDER ADULT CLINICAL FALL PREVENTION PROGRAMS | 2019 This document is a publication of the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Robert R. Redfield, MD, Director National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Debra Houry, MD, MPH, Director Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention Grant Baldwin, PhD, MPH, Director Home, Recreation, and Transportation Branch Ann Dellinger, PhD, MPH, Branch Chief Home and Recreation Injury Prevention Team Robin Lee, PhD, MPH, Team Lead ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We acknowledge and appreciate the important contributions of Elizabeth Burns, Erin Parker, Robin Lee and Celeste Chung for their guidance in preparing and organizing the contents of the guide. We also thank Elizabeth Eckstrom, Daniel Kidder and Briana Moreland for their thoughtful review and constructive feedback in finalizing the guide. Suggested Citation: Bergen G, Shakya I. CDC STEADI: Evaluation Guide for Older Adult Clinical Fall Prevention Programs.
    [Show full text]
  • CAT 3. Effective Interventions for Preventing Or Reducing Falls Appraised by Kevin Galbraith, December 2016 Update Due 2019
    Critically Appraised Topics (CATs) CAT 3. Effective interventions for preventing or reducing falls Appraised by Kevin Galbraith, December 2016 Update due 2019 Clinical question Search terms Among people with Parkinson’s, what are the most (Parkinson Disease/ OR Parkinson$) AND effective interventions for preventing or reducing falls? (Randomised Controlled Trials as topic/ OR randomi$) AND (Accidental Falls/ OR fall$) AND prevent$. Background Search strategy Among people with Parkinson’s, falls are both Ovid Medline, and adapted for Cochrane Library, frequent and recurrent, with 45–68% falling and CINAHL. All searches 2010 to August 2016, annually, and two-thirds of these falling English language. recurrently.1 Falls, gait impairment, and postural instability increase the risk of mortality and Evidence morbidity. Falls in PD can lead to fractures, From 31 articles, 10 addressed fall incidence or increased dependency, nursing home admission and frequency as a clinically relevant outcome. One 2 poor quality of life. This CAT sought to identify additional phase 2 trial, which investigated the the most effective interventions for preventing or effect of rivastigmine on gait stability,3 was added reducing falls among people with Parkinson’s. after discussion with the Evidence Based Practice Themed Working Group, in view of wide publicity. Clinical bottom line Summary of evidence Evidence was found from well-conducted The search conducted in this study yielded 10 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that intervention studies with fall reduction as an outcome: progressive resistance strength training and one meta-analysis of exercise and motor training;4 movement strategy training (both combined with three RCTs evaluating balance training specifically;5-7 fall prevention education), and Tai chi are effective one RCT evaluating two specific physiotherapy in preventing falls.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Learned from the VHA and Recommendations for Fall Related Injury Prevention
    Lessons Learned from the VHA and Recommendations for Fall Related Injury Prevention Christina Soncrant M.P.H. VA National Center for Patient Safety Christina Soncrant, M.P.H. Christina Soncrant, MPH, has worked for the VA National Center for Patient Safety for 8 years. She is currently a Health Science Specialist at the NCPS Field Office in Vermont. She joined the VA in 2011 after graduating from Dartmouth College with her masters degree in public health with a focus in healthcare improvement, implementation science, and health science research. Over the last 8 years her focus has been on fall and fall related injury prevention, fall data collection and evaluation, and coaching and leading breakthrough series nationwide on the topics of implementation science, falls prevention, pressure injury prevention, CAUTI and sepsis. In addition she does extensive work with other program offices such as the VISN 8 falls PSCI, the VA National surgery office, and the National Anesthesia Office. Her work involves evaluation of patient safety efforts such as Ensuring Correct Surgery, development of surgical and anesthesiology adverse event lessons learned for the field and research on adverse event prevention and improvement on various topics areas as well as research on implementation science and improvement projects such as the lessons learned and virtual breakthrough series. Learning Objectives: 1. Discuss the background of the current problem on preventing falls and fall related injuries. 2. Share the success stories from collaboration between the National Center for Patient Safety and State Veterans Homes in preventing fall and fall related injuries. 3. Describe the results and lessons learned from a year of reported root cause analyses on serious falls in the VHA.
    [Show full text]
  • Patient Safety: Preventing Falls and the Use of Restraints
    PATIENT SAFETY: PREVENTING FALLS AND THE USE OF RESTRAINTS INTRODUCTION Certified nursing assistants (CNAs) often care for patients who are elderly and CNAs may also care for patients who are confused or disoriented. The elderly patient and the patient who is confused may be at risk for falling and patient falls are a serious problem and significant cause of injury. Patient safety should always be one of your foremost priorities when you are working as a CNA, so you will need to know how to prevent patient falls. Most of the information and techniques you can use for preventing falls are simple, but they require a lot of careful and consistent effort in order for them to be used successfully. In addition, you must be sure to carefully document what you have done to keep patients safe and prevent falls and this is especially true if restraints must be used. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE This module is intended to provide CNAs with information about how, why, and to who falls happen. The module will also outline practical methods that can be used to prevent patient falls. PATIENT FALLS: FREQUENCY AND SERIOUSNESS A fall is defined as an unplanned descent to the floor, with or without injury. Falls can happen to almost any patient, but older adults are much more susceptible to falling. Falls are a very common occurrence in older adults, both in the community and in health care facilities. Approximately one-third of all older cnaZone.com cnaZone.com cnaZone.com cnaZone.com cnaZone.com cnaZone.com adults living in the community will fall at least once a year and one-half of those people will fall more than once.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Falls and Injuries from Falls
    Reducing Harm | Improving Healthcare | Protecting Canadians REDUCING FALLS AND INJURIES FROM FALLS Getting Started Kit Effective​ March 14, 2019, the Canadian Patient Safety Institute has archived the Reducing Falls and Injury from Falls intervention. For additional inquiries, please contact [email protected] June 2013 (Measures Revised April 2015) www.saferhealthcarenow.ca Safer Healthcare Now! Reducing Falls and Injuries from Falls Getting Started Kit Safer Healthcare Now! We invite you to join Safer Healthcare Now! to help improve the safety of the Canadian healthcare system. Safer Healthcare Now! is a national program supporting Canadian healthcare organizations to improve safety through the use of quality improvement methods and the integration of evidence in practice. To learn more about this intervention, to find out how to join Safer Healthcare Now! And to gain access to additional resources, contacts, and tools, visit our website at www.saferhealthcarenow.ca This Getting Started Kit (GSK) has been written to help engage your interdisciplinary teams in a dynamic approach for improving quality and safety while providing a basis for getting started. This Getting Started Kit represents the most current evidence, knowledge and practice, as of the date of publication and includes what has been learned since the first kit was released in 2010. We remain open to working consultatively on updating the content, as more evidence emerges, as together we make healthcare safer in Canada. Note: The Getting Started Kits for all interventions used by Safer Healthcare Now! are available in both French and English. This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission provided appropriate reference is made to Safer Healthcare Now! As of June 1, 2016, Safer Healthcare Now! is no longer collecting data and Patient Safety Metrics is no longer available.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation Guide to Prevention of Falls with Injury
    Implementation Guide to Prevention of Falls with Injury HRET Contact [email protected] (312) 834-7056 www.hret-hen.org Implementation Guide to Prevention of Falls with Injury 2 Table of Contents PREVENTION OF FALLS WITH AND WITHOUT INJURIES OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................... 4 BACKGROUND: ................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 SUGGESTED AIM: ............................................................................................................................................................................ 4 POTENTIAL MEASURES: ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 MAKING CHANGES: .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 KEY RESOURCES: .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 PREVENTION OF FALLS WITH INJURY DRIVER DIAGRAM .......................................................................................................... 5 PREVENTION OF FALLS WITH INJURY ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices for Falls Reduction a Practical Guide
    C on C ti E Supplement to nu in 1. g S 9 Ed ee cr u PECIAL EPORT p ed ca S R a it ti ge s on 20 ww w.AmericanNurseToda y.com March 2011 Best Practices for Falls Reduction A Practical Guide This continuing education program is supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Hill-Rom. Because even the best nurses in the world can use some support. The Sabina™ II Lift. Part of Hill-Rom’s No Falls™ Program. For patients requiring extra help to get up and down, Hill-Rom’s Sabina II sit-to-stand li gives the safest, smoothest, most comfortable li possible while helping to minimize falls and injuries. Be more condent knowing the Sabina II Li is giving you all the support you need. Find out more about the Sabina II Li and the Hill-Rom® No Falls Program at hill-rom.com. © 2011 Hill-Rom Services, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Meeting the challenge of falls reduction By Melissa A. Fitzpatrick, MSN, RN, FAAN, Vice President and Chief Clinical Officer, Hill-Rom ing concern. How many times have you and caregiver. By using a safety status hurt your back or shoulder while trying to board to provide visibility to critical proto - move a patient or pick her up from the cols and alarms, nurses can monitor pa - floor after she has fallen? tients from afar and keep them safe from Patient falls are ubiquitous. We must falls. You’ll find other examples and ap - think of new ways to solve this age-old con - proaches in this special report—practical cern.
    [Show full text]
  • Interventions for Reducing Falls and Harm from Falls in Older People with Cognitive Impairment
    Interventions for reducing falls and harm from falls in older people with cognitive impairment April 2019 Contents Key messages ..................................................................................................................... 3 Useful links .......................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 4 What is cognitive impairment? ........................................................................................... 4 Cognitive impairment increases falls and fracture risk ....................................................... 4 Interventions to reduce harm from falls for all older people ................................................ 5 Reviews of the evidence in those with cognitive impairment .............................................. 5 2. In the community ............................................................................................................ 6 Exercise ............................................................................................................................ 6 Home safety ...................................................................................................................... 7 Nutrition ............................................................................................................................. 7 Bone health ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Report on Falls Prevention Epidemiology of Falls
    A Global Report on Falls Prevention Epidemiology of Falls A Global Report on Falls Prevention Epidemiology of Falls Sachiyo Yoshida – Intern Ageing and Life Course Family and Community Health World Health Organization 1 A Global Report on Falls Prevention Epidemiology of Falls Table of contents 1. DEFINITION ...................................................................................................4 2. INCIDENCE.....................................................................................................5 2.1. FREQUENCY OF FALLS ......................................................................................................................................5 2.2. FALL -RELATED INJURIES : THE CANADIAN SURVEY ....................................................................................6 2.3. DISTRIBUTION ....................................................................................................................................................6 Time................................................................................................................................................................................6 Location...........................................................................................................................................................................7 Location of fall by age and sex group................................................................................................................................7 Location of fall-related fractures .......................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing Falls in Hospitals: a Toolkit for Improving Quality of Care
    Preventing Falls in Hospitals A Toolkit for Improving Quality of Care The information in this toolkit is intended to assist service providers and hospitals in developing falls prevention protocols. This toolkit is intended as a reference and not as a substitute for professional judgment. The opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of AHRQ. No statement in this toolkit should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. In addition, AHRQ or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services endorsement of any derivative product may not be stated or implied. Preventing Falls in Hospitals A Toolkit for Improving Quality of Care Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 www.ahrq.gov Prepared by: RAND Corporation Boston University School of Public Health ECRI Institute Contract No. HHSA290201000017I TO #1 AHRQ Publication No. 13-0015-EF January 2013 Authors RAND Corporation David A. Ganz, M.D., Ph.D., VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, University of California at Los Angeles, and RAND Corporation Christina Huang, M.P.H., RAND Corporation Debra Saliba, M.D., M.P.H., VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, UCLA/JH Borun Center for Gerontological Research, and RAND Corporation Victoria Shier, M.P.A., RAND Corporation Boston University School of Public Health Dan Berlowitz, M.D., M.P.H., Bedford VA Hospital and Boston University School of Public Health Carol VanDeusen Lukas, Ed.D., VA Boston Healthcare System and Boston University School of Public Health ECRI Institute Kathryn Pelczarski, B.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerinotes January 2019.Indd
    GERINOTES Academy of Geriatric Physical erapy Th is Issue President’s Message Editor’s Note Policy Talk: Post-acute Care Payment is Changing My Opinion: Productivity, an Ambiguous but Widely Sighted Monster Debility and Functional Decline in Long-term Care Facilities: Are We Part of the Problem? A Multi-disciplinary Event to Celebrate Falls Prevention Awareness Day National Fall Prevention Awareness Day Celebrations RIC RIAT PH Knowledge Translation – What Is It? E YS G IC F A Persistent Postural Perceptual Dizziness in the O L Elderly: A Theoretical Hypothesis for a Y T Missed Diagnosis in the Underserved Population M H E E Impact or LSVT-BIG on Functional Outcomes R in a Patient with Parkinson’s Disease: A Case Study D A A P C External Gait Cues: Improving Gait in Persons with Y A Parkinson’s Disease GET LIT A m n o Core Values: Measurement in Older Adults e ti ri ia ca c n so 3D Pharmacology: Management of Depression, Ph s ys py A Delirium, and Dementia in Older Adults ical Thera January 2019 | Volume 26, No. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS President’s Message .......................................................... 3 Knowledge Translation – What Is It? ............................. 16 Greg Hartley Mariana Wingood, Mary Milidonis Editor’s Note .................................................................... 4 Persistent Postural Perceptual Dizziness in Michele Stanley the Elderly: A Theoretical Hypothesis for a Missed Diagnosis in the Underserved Population.......... 18 Policy Talk: Post-acute Care Payment is Changing .......... 5 Jeffrey R. Guild Ellen R. Strunk Impact or LSVT-BIG on Functional Outcomes in My Opinion: Productivity, an Ambiguous a Patient with Parkinson’s Disease: A Case Study .........
    [Show full text]