DOCSLIB.ORG

Preventing Falls in Hospitals: a Toolkit for Improving Quality of Care

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preventing Falls in Hospitals: a Toolkit for Improving Quality of Care Preventing Falls in Hospitals A Toolkit for Improving Quality of Care The information in this toolkit is intended to assist service providers and hospitals in developing falls prevention protocols. This toolkit is intended as a reference and not as a substitute for professional judgment. The opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of AHRQ. No statement in this toolkit should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. In addition, AHRQ or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services endorsement of any derivative product may not be stated or implied. Preventing Falls in Hospitals A Toolkit for Improving Quality of Care Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 www.ahrq.gov Prepared by: RAND Corporation Boston University School of Public Health ECRI Institute Contract No. HHSA290201000017I TO #1 AHRQ Publication No. 13-0015-EF January 2013 Authors RAND Corporation David A. Ganz, M.D., Ph.D., VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, University of California at Los Angeles, and RAND Corporation Christina Huang, M.P.H., RAND Corporation Debra Saliba, M.D., M.P.H., VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, UCLA/JH Borun Center for Gerontological Research, and RAND Corporation Victoria Shier, M.P.A., RAND Corporation Boston University School of Public Health Dan Berlowitz, M.D., M.P.H., Bedford VA Hospital and Boston University School of Public Health Carol VanDeusen Lukas, Ed.D., VA Boston Healthcare System and Boston University School of Public Health ECRI Institute Kathryn Pelczarski, B.S. Karen Schoelles, M.D., S.M. Linda C. Wallace, M.S.N., B.S.N. Patricia Neumann, R.N., M.S. This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without special permission. Citation of the source is appreciated. Suggested citation: Ganz DA, Huang C, Saliba D, et al. Preventing falls in hospitals: a toolkit for improving quality of care. (Prepared by RAND Corporation, Boston University School of Public Health, and ECRI Institute under Contract No. HHSA290201000017I TO #1.) Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; January 2013. AHRQ Publication No. 13-0015-EF. ii Contents Roadmap ..........................................................................................................................................v Acknowledgments.......................................................................................................................... ix Overview ..........................................................................................................................................1 The Problem of Falls ..................................................................................................................1 The Challenges of Fall Prevention .............................................................................................1 Toolkit Designed for Multiple Audiences .................................................................................2 Implementation Guide Organized To Direct Hospitals Through the Change Process ..............3 Sections of the Guide .................................................................................................................3 Adaptation of the Guide to Your Organization..........................................................................3 Improvement as Puzzle Pieces ...................................................................................................4 Icons .................................................................................................................................................5 1. Are you ready for this change? ....................................................................................................6 1.1. Do organizational members understand why change is needed? ........................................6 1.2. Is there urgency to change? .................................................................................................8 1.3. Does senior administrative leadership support this program? ............................................9 1.4. Who will take ownership of this effort? ...........................................................................11 1.5. What kinds of resources are needed? ................................................................................12 1.6. What if you are not ready for full-scale change? ..............................................................12 1.7. Checklist for assessing readiness for change ....................................................................13 2. How will you manage change? ..................................................................................................14 2.1. How can you set up the Implementation Team for success? ............................................15 2.2. What needs to change and how do you need to redesign it? ............................................19 2.3. How should goals and plans for change be developed? ...................................................25 2.4. Checklist for managing change .........................................................................................26 3. Which fall prevention practices do you want to use? ................................................................27 3.1. Which fall prevention practices should you use? .............................................................28 3.2. What are universal fall precautions and how should they be implemented? ....................30 3.3. What is a standardized assessment of risk factors for falls, and how should this assessment be conducted? ............................................................................................34 3.4. How should identified risk factors be used for fall prevention care planning? ................38 3.5. How should you assess and manage patients after a fall? ................................................46 3.6. How can your hospital incorporate these practices into a fall prevention program? ........49 3.7. What additional resources are available to identify best practices for fall prevention? ...51 3.8. Checklist for best practices ...............................................................................................51 4. How do you implement the fall prevention program in your organization? .............................52 4.1. What roles and responsibilities will staff have in preventing falls? .................................53 4.2. What fall prevention practices go beyond the unit?..........................................................59 4.3. How do you put the new practices into operation? ...........................................................60 4.4. Checklist for implementing best practices ........................................................................67 5. How do you measure fall rates and fall prevention practices? ..................................................68 5.1. How do you measure fall and fall-related injury rates? ....................................................69 5.2. How do you measure fall prevention practices? ...............................................................77 5.3. Checklist for measuring progress......................................................................................80 iii 6. How do you sustain an effective fall prevention program? .......................................................81 6.1. Who will be responsible for sustaining active fall prevention efforts on an ongoing basis? .........................................................................................................82 6.2. How will you continue to monitor fall rates and fall prevention care processes? ............82 6.3. What types of ongoing organizational support do you need to keep the new practices in place? ........................................................................................................83 6.4. How can you reinforce the desired results? ......................................................................84 6.5. Summary ...........................................................................................................................87 7. Tools and Resources ..................................................................................................................89 Appendix: Bibliography of Studies Implementing Fall Prevention Practices .............................185 iv Roadmap Who Should Use The Section Action Steps Tool That Supports Action Tool Overview Enlist support of senior leaders Tool ØA, Introduction and Overview for Senior manager Stakeholders Section 1 Are you ready for this change? 1.1 Assess the culture of safety in your Tool 1A, Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture All interdisciplinary hospital team members 1.2 Evaluate current organizational Tool 1B, Stakeholder Analysis Implementation Team attention to falls leader 1.3 Assess and develop leadership Tool 1C, Leadership Support Assessment Implementation Team support for the fall prevention leader program Tool 1D, Business Case Form 1.5 Identify resources that are available Tool 1E, Resource Needs Assessment Implementation Team and resources that are needed leader 1.7 Assess your progress on completing Tool 1F, Organizational Readiness Checklist Implementation Team readiness for change activities leader Section 2 How will you manage change? 2.1 Identify your Implementation Team Tool 2A, Interdisciplinary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nursing Service Guidelines FALL PREVENTION MULTIDISCIPLINARY FALL PREVENTION
    Nursing Service Guidelines FALL PREVENTION Title: MULTIDISCIPLINARY FALL PREVENTION Responsibility: Multidisciplinary staff need to take an active role in fall prevention. Equipment: Fall identification wrist bands, fall identification materials, and fall prevention equipment. Purpose: Since research has identified that numerous intrinsic and extrinsic variables can contribute to a patient’s risk of falling during a hospitalization, it is essential to determine the risk factors that place the patient at the greatest (highest) risk. By utilizing strategies that take into consideration the fall risk assessment score, clinical judgement, medication management, the patients mental status, and the patients ability to ambulate, it is intended that this approach will help prevent patient falls. The purpose of this guideline is to provide multidisciplinary staff with fall risk assessment tools that can be used to assist them in properly identifying those patients at risk for falling and determining interventions. General Information: A fall is defined as any unplanned descent to the floor, with or without injury (National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators [NDNQI], 2015). A fall may be either unassisted or assisted (where someone helps to ‘break’ the fall by helping the patient to the floor) and the NDNQI definition also includes falls where a patient lands on a surface where you would not expect to find the patient. University of Toledo Medical Center’s (UTMCs) fall injury level categories: • None • Minor (dressing, ice, cleaning, or elevation) • Moderate (suturing, splinting, or steri-strips/skin glue) • Major* (surgery, casting, traction, or neuro consult) • Death* (died as a result of injuries sustained from the fall) *if a patient’s fall has a major injury level or results in a death, the department manager or house supervisor and Quality Management need to be notified immediately.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment Module
    Assessment Module 1 | Page Assessment May 2017 Table of Contents About this Module/Overview/Objectives……………………………………………...Page 3 Pre-test…………………………………………………………………………………Pages 4-5 Chapter 1……………………………………………………………………………....Pages 6-12 Overview Focused Assessment vs. Comprehensive Assessment Considerations in preparing for a physical exam Geriatric Assessment Nursing Components Considerations in Elderly Residents Chapter 2……………………………………………………………………………...Pages 12-14 Root Cause of Behaviors Physiologic Social Environmental Psychosocial Chapter 3……………………………………………………………………………...Pages 14-16 Risk Assessment Eyes Ears Hemiparesis Paraplegia Where to place the resident in the room Chapter 4……………………………………………………………...………………Pages 16-18 Texas Board of Nursing and Assessments Federal Nursing Facility Regulations F272: Comprehensive Assessments State Nursing Facility Regulations Chapter 5………………………………………………………………………….......Pages 18-19 Resources “This is me” “This is me: My Care Passport” Alternate Communication Boards Pain, Pain Go Away Presentation Appendices……………………………………………………………………………Pages 20-48 2 | Page Assessment May 2017 About this Module: Assessment is a key component of nursing practice, required for planning and the provision of resident and family centered care. Information that is obtained from an accurate assessment serves as the foundation for age-appropriate nursing care, enhancing the residents’ quality of life and independence. The LVN must have a specific set of skills in order to adequately and effectively assess the resident, including: a physical assessment; a functional assessment; and any additional information about the resident that would be used to develop the care plan. This module will provide you with all of the information necessary to ensure adequate assessments are completed for each resident in the facility, meeting the state and federal requirements for resident assessment. Overview: Conditions such as functional impairment and dementia are common in nursing home residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Fall Risk in Patients Receiving Palliative Care Consultations
    University of Michigan Health System Part IV Maintenance of Certification Program [Form 5/19/15] Report on a QI Project Eligible for Part IV MOC Assessment of Fall Risk in Patients Receiving Palliative Care Consultations Instructions Determine eligibility. Before starting to complete this report, go to the UMHS MOC website [ocpd.med.umich.edu], click on “Part IV Credit Designation,” and review sections 1 and 2. Complete and submit a “QI Project Preliminary Worksheet for Part IV Eligibility.” Staff from the UMHS Part IV MOC Program will review the worksheet with you to explain any adjustments needed to be eligible. (The approved Worksheet provides an outline to complete this report.) Completing the report. The report documents completion of each phase of the QI project. Final confirmation of Part IV MOC for a project occurs when the full report is submitted and approved. An option for preliminary review (recommended) is to complete a description of activities through the intervention phase and submit the partially completed report. (Complete at least items 1-16 and 27a-b.) Staff from the UMHS Part IV MOC Program will provide a preliminary review, checking that the information is sufficiently clear, but not overly detailed. This simplifies completion and review of descriptions of remaining activities. Questions are in bold font and answers should be in regular font (generally immediately below the questions). To check boxes electronically, either put an “X” in front of a box or copy and paste “ ” over the blank box. For further information and to submit completed applications, contact either: Grant Greenberg, MD, UMHS Part IV Program Lead, 763-936-1671, [email protected] R.
    [Show full text]
  • Nursing Students' Perspectives on Telenursing in Patient Care After
    Clinical Simulation in Nursing (2015) 11, 244-250 www.elsevier.com/locate/ecsn Featured Article Nursing Students’ Perspectives on Telenursing in Patient Care After Simulation Inger Ase Reierson, RN, MNSca,*, Hilde Solli, RN, MNSc, CCNa, Ida Torunn Bjørk, RN, MNSc, Dr.polit.a,b aFaculty of Health and Social Studies, Institute of Health Studies, Telemark University College, 3901 Porsgrunn, Norway bFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, Department of Nursing Science, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway KEYWORDS Abstract telenursing; Background: This article presents the perspectives of undergraduate nursing students on telenursing simulation; in patient care after simulating three telenursing scenarios using real-time video and audio nursing education; technology. information and Methods: An exploratory design using focus group interviews was performed; data were analyzed us- communication ing qualitative content analysis. technology; Results: Five main categories arose: learning a different nursing role, influence on nursing assessment qualitative content and decision making, reflections on the quality of remote comforting and care, empowering the pa- analysis tient, and ethical and economic reflections. Conclusions: Delivering telenursing care was regarded as important yet complex activity. Telenursing simulation should be integrated into undergraduate nursing education. Cite this article: Reierson, I. A., Solli, H., & Bjørk, I. T. (2015, April). Nursing students’ perspectives on telenursing in patient care after simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(4), 244-250. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ecns.2015.02.003. Ó 2015 International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/).
    [Show full text]
  • Consensus-Based Clinical Practice Recommendations for the Examination and Management of Falls in Patients with Parkinson’S Diseaseq
    Parkinsonism and Related Disorders 20 (2014) 360e369 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Parkinsonism and Related Disorders journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/parkreldis Editor’s comment: In this thoughtful and provocative Point-of-View contribution, van der Eijk and colleagues address the shortcomings of the classical model of “professional physician-centered care” and describe an alternative “collaborative patient-centered care” approach that involves, among many other things, shared decision making with patients in the context of a multidisciplinary care setting. They propose that this alternative approach may improve quality of care and produce better outcomes for individuals with disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, while also being cost-effective. The authors discuss their experience with such an approach and describe both the benefits and barriers they have encountered. Whether one agrees or disagrees with the authors’ proposals, this article will provide much food for thought and reflection. Ronald F. Pfeiffer, Editor-in-Chief Department of Neurology, University of Tennessee HSC, 855 Monroe Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, USA Point of view Consensus-based clinical practice recommendations for the examination and management of falls in patients with Parkinson’s diseaseq Marjolein A. van der Marck a, Margit Ph.C. Klok a, Michael S. Okun b, Nir Giladi c, Marten Munneke a,d, Bastiaan R. Bloem e,*, on behalf of the NPF Falls Task Force1 a Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen Centre for Evidence Based Practice, Department
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of High Fall Risk Patients in Acute Rehab
    Running head: HIGH FALL RISK IN ARU 1 Identification of High Fall Risk Patients in Acute Rehab Vanessa Vonderhaar-Picard DNP, MEd, RN, CNML An evidence-based doctoral project presented to the Department of Nursing at Mount St. Joseph University in partial fulfillment of the Degree: Doctor of Nursing Practice Date: May 14, 2019 Susan A. Johnson, PhD, RN - DNP Advisor Copyright by Vanessa Vonderhaar-Picard DNP, MEd, RN, CNML 2019 2 HIGH FALL RISK IN ARU Identification of High Fall Risk Patients in Acute Rehab Vanessa M. Vonderhaar-Picard Mount St. Joseph University 3 HIGH FALL RISK IN ARU Table of Contents Executive Summary………………………………………………………………….……………5 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………. 6 Problem……………………………………………………………………………………………6 PICOT Question…………………………………………………………………………..…….....9 Literature Review……………………………………………………………………………...…10 Search Description……………………………………………………………………….10 Table 1 Literature Review…………………………………………………………….....11 Summary of Levels of Evidence ………………………………………………………...12 Table 2 Level of Evidence……………………………………………………………….12 Falls………………………………………………………………………………………13 Fall Risk………………………………………………………………………………….13 Acute Rehab Risk Factors for Falls……………………………………………………...15 Psychiatric Risk Factors for Falls ……………………………………………………….16 Morse Fall Scale…………………………………………………………………………17 Table 3 Morse Fall Scale………………………………………………………………...18 Edmonson Psychiatric Fall Assessment Tool.…………..……………………………….18 Table 4 Edmonson Psychiatric Fall Assessment Tool…………………………………..20 Comparison of Edmonson and Morse Fall Scales……………………………………….21
    [Show full text]
  • Cardiovascular Assessment
    Cardiovascular Assessment A Home study Course Offered by Nurses Research Publications P.O. Box 480 Hayward CA 94543-0480 Office: 510-888-9070 Fax: 510-537-3434 No unauthorized duplication photocopying of this course is permitted Editor: Nurses Research 1 HOW TO USE THIS COURSE Thank you for choosing Nurses Research Publication home study for your continuing education. This course may be completed as rapidly as you desire. However there is a one-year maximum time limit. If you have downloaded this course from our website you will need to log back on to pay and complete your test. After you submit your test for grading you will be asked to complete a course evaluation and then your certificate of completion will appear on your screen for you to print and keep for your records. Satisfactory completion of the examination requires a passing score of at least 70%. No part of this course may be copied or circulated under copyright law. Instructions: 1. Read the course objectives. 2. Read and study the course. 3. Log back onto our website to pay and take the test. If you have already paid for the course you will be asked to login using the username and password you selected when you registered for the course. 4. When you are satisfied that the answers are correct click grade test. 5. Complete the evaluation. 6. Print your certificate of completion. If you have a procedural question or “nursing” question regarding the materials, call (510) 888-9070 for assistance. Only instructors or our director may answer a nursing question about the test.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Nursing Diagnosis in CA Nursing Schools
    USE OF NURSING DIAGNOSIS IN CALIFORNIA NURSING SCHOOLS AND HOSPITALS January 2018 Funded by generous support from the California Hospital Association (CHA) Copyright 2018 by HealthImpact. All rights reserved. HealthImpact 663 – 13th Street, Suite 300 Oakland, CA 94612 www.healthimpact.org USE OF NURSING DIAGNOSIS IN CALIFORNIA NURSING SCHOOLS AND HOSPITALS INTRODUCTION As part of the effort to define the value of nursing, a common language continues to arise as a central issue in understanding, communicating, and carrying out nursing's unique role in identifying and treating patient response to illness. The diagnostic process and evidence-based interventions developed and subsequently implemented by a practice discipline describe its unique contribution, scope of accountability, and value. The specific responsibility registered nurses (RN) have in assessing patient response to health and illness and determining evidence-based etiology is within the realm of nursing’s autonomous scope of practice, and is referred to as nursing diagnosis. It is an essential element of the nursing process and is followed by implementing specific interventions within nursing’s scope of practice, providing evidence that links professional practice to health outcomes. Conducting a comprehensive nursing assessment leading to the accurate identification of nursing diagnoses guides the development of the plan of care and specific interventions to be carried out. Assessing the patient’s response to health and illness encompasses a wide range of potential problems and actual concerns to be addressed, many of which may not arise from the medical diagnosis and provider orders alone, yet can impede recovery and impact health outcomes. Further, it is critically important to communicate those problems, potential vulnerabilities and related plans of care through broadly understood language unique to nursing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brain That Changes Itself
    The Brain That Changes Itself Stories of Personal Triumph from the Frontiers of Brain Science NORMAN DOIDGE, M.D. For Eugene L. Goldberg, M.D., because you said you might like to read it Contents 1 A Woman Perpetually Falling . Rescued by the Man Who Discovered the Plasticity of Our Senses 2 Building Herself a Better Brain A Woman Labeled "Retarded" Discovers How to Heal Herself 3 Redesigning the Brain A Scientist Changes Brains to Sharpen Perception and Memory, Increase Speed of Thought, and Heal Learning Problems 4 Acquiring Tastes and Loves What Neuroplasticity Teaches Us About Sexual Attraction and Love 5 Midnight Resurrections Stroke Victims Learn to Move and Speak Again 6 Brain Lock Unlocked Using Plasticity to Stop Worries, OPsessions, Compulsions, and Bad Habits 7 Pain The Dark Side of Plasticity 8 Imagination How Thinking Makes It So 9 Turning Our Ghosts into Ancestors Psychoanalysis as a Neuroplastic Therapy 10 Rejuvenation The Discovery of the Neuronal Stem Cell and Lessons for Preserving Our Brains 11 More than the Sum of Her Parts A Woman Shows Us How Radically Plastic the Brain Can Be Appendix 1 The Culturally Modified Brain Appendix 2 Plasticity and the Idea of Progress Note to the Reader All the names of people who have undergone neuroplastic transformations are real, except in the few places indicated, and in the cases of children and their families. The Notes and References section at the end of the book includes comments on both the chapters and the appendices. Preface This book is about the revolutionary discovery that the human brain can change itself, as told through the stories of the scientists, doctors, and patients who have together brought about these astonishing transformations.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation Guide for Older Adult Clinical Fall Prevention Programs
    CDC STEADI: Evaluation Guide for Older Adult Clinical Fall Prevention Programs Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths & Injuries www.cdc.gov/steadi CDC STEADI: EVALUATION GUIDE FOR OLDER ADULT CLINICAL FALL PREVENTION PROGRAMS | 2019 2 CDC STEADI: EVALUATION GUIDE FOR OLDER ADULT CLINICAL FALL PREVENTION PROGRAMS | 2019 CDC STEADI: Evaluation Guide for Older Adult Clinical Fall Prevention Programs By 1 1,2 Gwen Bergen, PhD, MPH, and Iju Shakya, MPH 1Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia 2Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) fellow to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2019 3 CDC STEADI: EVALUATION GUIDE FOR OLDER ADULT CLINICAL FALL PREVENTION PROGRAMS | 2019 This document is a publication of the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Robert R. Redfield, MD, Director National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Debra Houry, MD, MPH, Director Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention Grant Baldwin, PhD, MPH, Director Home, Recreation, and Transportation Branch Ann Dellinger, PhD, MPH, Branch Chief Home and Recreation Injury Prevention Team Robin Lee, PhD, MPH, Team Lead ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We acknowledge and appreciate the important contributions of Elizabeth Burns, Erin Parker, Robin Lee and Celeste Chung for their guidance in preparing and organizing the contents of the guide. We also thank Elizabeth Eckstrom, Daniel Kidder and Briana Moreland for their thoughtful review and constructive feedback in finalizing the guide. Suggested Citation: Bergen G, Shakya I. CDC STEADI: Evaluation Guide for Older Adult Clinical Fall Prevention Programs.
    [Show full text]
  • CAT 3. Effective Interventions for Preventing Or Reducing Falls Appraised by Kevin Galbraith, December 2016 Update Due 2019
    Critically Appraised Topics (CATs) CAT 3. Effective interventions for preventing or reducing falls Appraised by Kevin Galbraith, December 2016 Update due 2019 Clinical question Search terms Among people with Parkinson’s, what are the most (Parkinson Disease/ OR Parkinson$) AND effective interventions for preventing or reducing falls? (Randomised Controlled Trials as topic/ OR randomi$) AND (Accidental Falls/ OR fall$) AND prevent$. Background Search strategy Among people with Parkinson’s, falls are both Ovid Medline, and adapted for Cochrane Library, frequent and recurrent, with 45–68% falling and CINAHL. All searches 2010 to August 2016, annually, and two-thirds of these falling English language. recurrently.1 Falls, gait impairment, and postural instability increase the risk of mortality and Evidence morbidity. Falls in PD can lead to fractures, From 31 articles, 10 addressed fall incidence or increased dependency, nursing home admission and frequency as a clinically relevant outcome. One 2 poor quality of life. This CAT sought to identify additional phase 2 trial, which investigated the the most effective interventions for preventing or effect of rivastigmine on gait stability,3 was added reducing falls among people with Parkinson’s. after discussion with the Evidence Based Practice Themed Working Group, in view of wide publicity. Clinical bottom line Summary of evidence Evidence was found from well-conducted The search conducted in this study yielded 10 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that intervention studies with fall reduction as an outcome: progressive resistance strength training and one meta-analysis of exercise and motor training;4 movement strategy training (both combined with three RCTs evaluating balance training specifically;5-7 fall prevention education), and Tai chi are effective one RCT evaluating two specific physiotherapy in preventing falls.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Conduct a Medical Record Review
    How to Conduct a Medical Record Review WHITE PAPER Summary: This paper defines a recommended process for medical record review. This includes the important first step of defining the “why” behind the review, and marrying the review outcome to organizational goals. Medical record review is perhaps the core responsibility of the CDI profession- z FEATURES al. Although the numbers vary by facility, CDI specialists review an average of 16–24 patient charts daily, a task that compromises the bulk of their workday Aligning record reviews to (ACDIS, 2016).1 During the review, CDI professionals comb the chart for incom- organizational goals .................2 plete, imprecise, illegible, conflicting, or absent documentation of diagnoses, Principles of record procedures, and treatments, as well as supporting clinical indicators. Their review .......................................3 goal is to cultivate a medical record that stands alone as an accurate story of a ED/EMS notes ..........................5 patient encounter, providing a full picture of the patient’s illness and record of History and physical (H&P) ......6 treatment. A complete record allows for continuity of care, reliable collection of Operative note or bedside mortality and morbidity data, quality statistics, and accurate reimbursement. procedures ...............................7 Diagnostics and medications ...8 In their review of the medical record, CDI professionals aim to reconstruct the Progress notes, consults, and patient story from admission to discharge by examining, understanding, and nursing documentation ............9 synthesizing many puzzle pieces from disparate systems and people. This Initial vs. subsequent process requires considerable clinical acumen, critical thinking akin to detective reviews .....................................9 work, and knowledge of coding guidelines and quality measure requirements.
    [Show full text]