DOCSLIB.ORG

Hearing Decision 20100204 FINAL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hearing Decision 20100204 FINAL IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND Application for resource consent made pursuant to Section 88 of the Act – TO Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council (MWRC) Application Numbers: 104949, 104950, 104951, 104952 AND Tararua District Council (TDC) File Number: 12003.030 BY New Zealand Windfarms Limited IN RELATION TO To the development of an extension to the Te Rere Hau wind farm on the eastern side of the Tararua Ranges. The proposed Te Rere Hau Eastern Extension consists of 56 wind turbines located across approximately 300 hectares. Each turbine tower is 29 metres in height and reaches a maximum height of 47 metres with the tower and blade combined. Access to the proposed site will be off the Pahiatua Track via North Range Road. Decision of Joint Hearings Commissioners HEARING DATES: 6 – 14 October; 28-29 October; 11 November 2009 HEARING PANEL: David McMahon (Independent Commissioner and Chair) Cr Annette Main (MWRC Councillor) Cr Warren Davidson (TDC Councillor) DATE OF DECISION: 31 January 2010 Notice of Decision 1 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................5 2. THE PROPOSAL...........................................................................................................5 3. SITE LOCALITY AND DESCRIPTION.....................................................................6 Application Site..............................................................................................................................................6 Surrounding Area..........................................................................................................................................7 Wind farms in the wider area.......................................................................................................................7 Relevant Resource Consents........................................................................................................................7 4. NOTIFICATION, CONSULTATION AND THE HEARING................................10 Notification..................................................................................................................................................10 Submissions..................................................................................................................................................10 Further Information....................................................................................................................................12 The Hearing.................................................................................................................................................13 Request for Postponement of Hearing....................................................................................................16 Hearing Minute re: Adjournment for Caucusing and Site Visits..........................................................18 Hearing Minute for Proposed Tararua District Plan (with decisions).................................................18 Hearing Closure...........................................................................................................................................19 Hearing Note...............................................................................................................................................19 5. STATUTORY FRAMEWORK FOR DECISION.......................................................19 Preliminary Matter.......................................................................................................................................19 Legislation.....................................................................................................................................................20 Permitted Activity Baseline........................................................................................................................22 Statutory Instruments (Section 104(1)(b) Assessment).........................................................................23 Overall Activity Status................................................................................................................................25 Weighting of Statutory Instruments.........................................................................................................25 Non - Statutory Instruments (Section 104(1)(c)) “Other Matters”......................................................26 6. ISSUES OF CONTENTION......................................................................................26 Context..........................................................................................................................................................26 Overview of Issues......................................................................................................................................27 Preliminary Notes on the basis of this decision......................................................................................27 7. CONSTRUCTION EFFECTS....................................................................................33 Evidence heard............................................................................................................................................33 Issues Arising...............................................................................................................................................34 Traffic/Roading Effects.............................................................................................................................35 Construction Noise.....................................................................................................................................37 Archaeological & cultural effects associated with construction...........................................................38 Ecological effects of construction (and operation) of the Wind Farm...............................................40 Other Construction issues..........................................................................................................................45 Conclusion on Construction Effects........................................................................................................45 8. LANDSCAPE/VISUAL AMENITY EFFECTS.........................................................46 AEE, Submissions, Evidence and Issues.................................................................................................46 Evaluation.....................................................................................................................................................52 Conclusion on Landscape/Visual Amenity Effects...............................................................................58 9. OPERATIONAL NOISE EFFECTS..........................................................................59 AEE, Submissions, Evidence and Issues.................................................................................................59 Evaluation.....................................................................................................................................................66 Conclusion....................................................................................................................................................70 10. OTHER EFFECTS......................................................................................................71 Shadow Flicker and Blade Glint................................................................................................................71 Recreational..................................................................................................................................................71 Notice of Decision 2 Effects on Subdivision Potential...............................................................................................................72 Decommissioning Issues............................................................................................................................72 Other Inconsequential Matters..................................................................................................................73 11. POSITIVE EFFECTS..................................................................................................73 Positive effects to National interests........................................................................................................73 Positive effects to local interests...............................................................................................................74 Evaluation.....................................................................................................................................................75 12. OVERALL EVALUATION OF THE PROPOSAL....................................................75 Summary of Effects Assessment...............................................................................................................75 Evaluation of Statutory Instruments and Other Matters......................................................................76 Evaluation of Part II Matters.....................................................................................................................76 13. DECISION...................................................................................................................79 Notice of Decision 3 NOTICE OF DECISION MWRC: 104950,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Renewable Energy Grid Integration in New Zealand, Tokyo, Japan
    APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Renewable Energy Grid Integration in New Zealand Workshop on Grid Interconnection Issues for Renewable Energy 12 October, 2010 Tokyo, Japan RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Coverage Electricity Generation in New Zealand, The Electricity Market, Grid Connection Issues, Technical Solutions, Market Solutions, Problems Encountered Key Points. RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Electricity in New Zealand 7 Major Generators, 1 Transmission Grid owner – the System Operator, 29 Distributors, 610 km HVDC link between North and South Islands, Installed Capacity 8,911 MW, System Generation Peak about 7,000 MW, Electricity Generated 42,000 GWh, Electricity Consumed, 2009, 38,875 GWh, Losses, 2009, 346 GWh, 8.9% Annual Demand growth of 2.4% since 1974 RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Installed Electricity Capacity, 2009 (MW) Renew able Hydro 5,378 60.4% Generation Geothermal 627 7.0% Wind 496 5.6% Wood 18 0.2% Biogas 9 0.1% Total 6,528 73.3% Non-Renew able Gas 1,228 13.8% Generation Coal 1,000 11.2% Diesel 155 1.7% Total 2,383 26.7% Total Generation 8,91 1 100.0% RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Electricity Generation, 2009 (GWh) Renew able Hydro 23,962 57.0% Generation Geothermal 4,542 10.8% Wind 1,456 3.5% Wood 323 0.8% Biogas 195 0.5% Total 30,478 72.6% Non-Renew able Gas 8,385 20.0% Generation Coal 3,079 7.3% Oil 8 0.0% Waste Heat 58 0.1% Total 11,530 27.4% Total Generation 42,008 1 00.0% RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Electricity from Renewable Energy New Zealand has a high usage of Renewable Energy • Penetration 67% , • Market Share 64% Renewable Energy Penetration Profile is Changing, • Hydroelectricity 57% (decreasing but seasonal), • Geothermal 11% (increasing), • 3.5% Wind Power (increasing).
    [Show full text]
  • NZ Geomechanics News June 2005 NEW ZEALAND GEOMECHANICS NEWS
    Newsletter of the New Zealand Issue 69 Geotechnical Society Inc. 1SSN 0111–6851 NZ Geomechanics News June 2005 NEW ZEALAND GEOMECHANICS NEWS JUNE 2005, ISSUE 69 CONTENTS Chairman’s Corner . 2 Editorial Good Reasons to be Good - P Glassey . 3 Letters to the Editor . 4 Editorial Policy. 4 Report from the Secretary . 6 International Society Reports ISSMGE . 7 IAEG . 8 ISRM . 10 ISRM - Rocha Medal . 11 ISRM - National Group website . 12 NZGS Branch Activities . 13 Conference Adverts . 20 Reviews Degrees of Belief. 23 Mapping in Engineering Geology . 24 Geotechnical Engineering Education . 25 Project News Banda Aceh - 8 Weeks After Disaster Struck . 26 Strengthening Ngaio Gorge Road Walls . 34 Te Apiti Wind Farm: Megawatt-class Machines aided by Geotechnical Expertise. 37 Geotechnical Investigations and Testing for Wellington Inner City Bypass . 40 Standards, Law and Industry News Why doesn’t New Zealand have a Geotechnical Database? . 42 Breaking News 18 May rainstorm Damage, Bay of Plenty . 43 Technical Articles Numerical Analysis in Geotechnical Engineering Final Part . 44 The Bob Wallace Column . 49 Company Profiles Keith Gillepsie Associates . 50 Boart Longyear Drillwell . 52 Member Profiles Merrick Taylor . 54 Ann Williams . 55 Events Diary . 57 New Zealand Geotechnical Society Inc Information . 60 New Zealand Geotechnical Society Inc Publications 2005 . 63 Advertising Information . 64 Cover photo: Landslide debris, Tauranga as a result of the 18 May 2005 rainstorm Photo Credit: Mauri McSaveney, GNS New Zealand Geomechanics News CHAIRMAN’S
    [Show full text]
  • Meridian Energy ERU 03-06 PDD Stage 2 Final
    Te Apiti Wind Farm Project (Previously the Lower North Island Wind Project) Project Design Document ERUPT 3 Project: Te Apiti Wind Farm Project (Previously Lower North Island Wind Project) Reference: ERU 03/06 Document: Baseline Study Version: 2 Programme: ERUPT 3 Stage 2 Date: August 2003 1 PROJECT DETAILS 1.1 Project characteristics Supplier Company name Meridian Energy Limited Address 15 Allen Street Zip Code & City Address Wellington Postal Address PO Box 10-840 Zip Code & City Postal Address Wellington Country New Zealand Contact Person Ms Tracy Dyson Job Title Sustainable Energy and Climate Change Advisor Tele phone Number +64 4 381 1271 Fax Number +64 4 381 1201 E-mail [email protected] Bank/Giro Number Upon Request Bank WestpacTrust No. of Employees 202 Company’s Main Activity Electricity Generation, Retailing, Trading CPV Number WN/938552 Registration Number Professional or Trade Not Applicable Register Date of Registration 17th March 1999 Local contacts and other parties involved The local contact will be Meridian Energy Ltd who will be the project owner, project manager and project developer. Te Apiti Wind Farm Project Design Document 2003 Page 2 of 67 Confidential 20th August 2003 1.2 Project Abstract Project Title Te Apiti Wind Farm Host country New Zealand Abstract Meridian Energy, New Zealand’s largest generator of electricity from renewable resources and a state owned enterprise would like to develop a wind generation project in the lower North Island of New Zealand. This project is called the Te Apiti Wind Farm and will have a capacity of between 82.5-96.25 MW.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Board of Inquiry Statement of Evidence Of
    BEFORE THE BOARD OF INQUIRY In the matter of a Board of Inquiry appointed under s146 of the Resource Management Act 1991 to consider an application by Mighty River Power Limited for resource consents to construct and operate a Windfarm at Turitea STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF JAMES TALBOT BAINES Dated: 22nd May 2009 Contact: Andrew Brown Address: Council Chambers The Square Palmerston North Telephone: (06) 356 8199 Facsimile: (06) 355 4155 Email: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Bio-data and experience .................................................................................... 1 1.2 Brief for this Social Impact Assessment ............................................................. 2 1.3 The proposal being assessed ............................................................................ 2 2 ASSESSMENT APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ................................................. 3 2.1 Introduction and rationale ................................................................................... 3 2.2 Consultation coverage ....................................................................................... 4 2.3 Frameworks for assessment .............................................................................. 5 2.4 Sources of information ....................................................................................... 6 2.5 Citizens Panel Survey .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Castle Hill Wind Farm: Electricity-Related Effects Report
    Castle Hill Wind Farm: Electricity-Related Effects Report Prepared for Genesis Energy July 2011 Concept Consulting Group Limited Level 6, Featherston House 119-121 Featherston St PO Box 10-045, Wellington, NZ www.concept.co.nz Contents 1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................6 1.1 Purpose..................................................................................................................................6 1.2 Information sources ..............................................................................................................6 1.3 Concept Consulting Group.....................................................................................................6 2 The Castle Hill Wind Farm Project....................................................................................7 2.1 Project Outline.......................................................................................................................7 2.2 Key Electrical Parameters for CHWF......................................................................................7 3 Electricity in the New Zealand Economy..........................................................................8 3.1 Electricity and Consumer Energy...........................................................................................8 3.2 Electricity consumption and supply in New Zealand.............................................................9 3.3 Historical Electricity Demand
    [Show full text]
  • Did Impact Assessment Influence the Decision Makers? IAIA'12
    Did Impact Assessment influence the decision makers? The Turitea wind farm proposal in New Zealand IAIA’12 – Porto,,g Portugal Theme Forum: Even renewables may not be acceptable: Negotiating community responses to wind energy through impact assessment The setting Wind farms near the city of Palmerston North: existing (3), permitted (1) and proposed (1) Te Apiti wind farm as seen from near the village of Ashhurst Tararua wind farm as seen from the village of Ashhurst Tararua wind farm – stage 1 – lattice towers. Sheep farming continues. Tararua wind farm (3-bladed, 2MW) and Te Rere Hau wind farm (2-bladed, 500kW) City of Palmerston North from Te Rere Hau wind farm Te Rere Hau wind farm from Palmerston North City Which communities? 1st wind farm: built by Palmerston North lines company to supply Palmerston North Now: all wind farms supply the national (grid) community Rural-residential communities closest to the windfarms? The next proposal – wider community context The next proposal – localised community context The next proposal – localised community context SIA activities: Multiple-method approach Surveys (226 & 212 respondents) •Random survey of city residents (Citizen Panel) •Spatially targeted survey of people living within 5km of an existing turbine (ex-post survey) Focus groups (41 participants) •1 for landowners with turbines; •4 for near neighbours without turbines Interviews (34) •Recreation groups, tourism sector, wind farm companies, construction/servicing companies, regional economic development interests, iwi Declining levels
    [Show full text]
  • In Liquidation)
    Liquidators’ First Report on the State of Affairs of Taratahi Agricultural Training Centre (Wairarapa) Trust Board (in Liquidation) 8 March 2019 Contents Introduction 2 Statement of Affairs 4 Creditors 5 Proposals for Conducting the Liquidation 6 Creditors' Meeting 7 Estimated Date of Completion of Liquidation 8 Appendix A – Statement of Affairs 9 Appendix B – Schedule of known creditors 10 Appendix C – Creditor Claim Form 38 Appendix D - DIRRI 40 Liquidators First Report Taratahi Agricultural Training Centre (Wairarapa) Trust Board (in Liquidation) 1 Introduction David Ian Ruscoe and Malcolm Russell Moore, of Grant Thornton New Zealand Limited (Grant Thornton), were appointed joint and several Interim Liquidators of the Taratahi Agricultural Training Centre (Wairarapa) Trust Board (in Liquidation) (the “Trust” or “Taratahi”) by the High Count in Wellington on 19 December 2018. Mr Ruscoe and Mr Moore were then appointed Liquidators of the Trust on 5th February 2019 at 10.50am by Order of the High Court. The Liquidators and Grant Thornton are independent of the Trust. The Liquidators’ Declaration of Independence, Relevant Relationships and Indemnities (“DIRRI”) is attached to this report as Appendix D. The Liquidators set out below our first report on the state of the affairs of the Companies as required by section 255(2)(c)(ii)(A) of the Companies Act 1993 (the “Act”). Restrictions This report has been prepared by us in accordance with and for the purpose of section 255 of the Act. It is prepared for the sole purpose of reporting on the state of affairs with respect to the Trust in liquidation and the conduct of the liquidation.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision No. 2013 Nzenvc 59 of Resource Consent. Applications
    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Decision No. 2013 NZEnvC 59 of resource consent. applications IN THE MATTER directly referred to the Court under Section 8.7C(1) of the Resource Management Act 1991 MERIDIAN ENERGY LIMITED BY (ENV -2011-CHC-000090) Applicant Hearing dates: 27, 28 August, 2012; 3-7, 10- 14, 24-28 September, 2012; 1-5, 15-17, 23 October, 2012. Site visits: 29 August, 19 September (Te Uku), 14 & 24 October, 2012 Court: Judge M Harland Commissioner MP Oliver Deputy Commissioner B Gollop Date: 15 Apri12013 INTERIM DECISION A. The applications for resource consent are granted subject to amended conditions. B. We record for the ·avoidance of doubt, that this decision is final in respect of the confirmation of the grant of the resource consents (on amended conditions) but is interim in respect of the precise wording of the conditions, and in particular the details relating to the Community Fund condition(s). C. We direct the Hurunui District Council and the Canterbury Regional Council to submit to the Court amended conditions of consent giving effect to this decision by 17 May 2013. In preparing the amended conditions the Councils are to consult with the other parties, particularly in relation to the condition(s) relating to the Community Fund. D. If any party wishes to make submissions in relation to the Community Fund conditions, these are to be filed by 17 May 2013. E. Costs are reserved. Hurunui District Council Respondent Canterbury Regional Council Respondent Appearances: Mr A Beatson, Ms N Garvan and Ms E Taffs for Meridian
    [Show full text]
  • Section 87F Report to Waka Kotahi Nz Transport Agency
    IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of applications by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency to Manawatu Whanganui Regional Council for resource consents associated with the construction and operation of Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway. SECTION 87F REPORT TO WAKA KOTAHI NZ TRANSPORT AGENCY MANAWATŪ-WHANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL 25 May 2020 Section 87F Report APP-2017201552.00 - Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway 1 Prepared by Mark St.Clair – Planning A. OUTLINE OF REPORT 1 This report, required by section 87F of the Resource Management Act 1991 (“RMA”), addresses the issues set out in sections 104 to 112 of the RMA, to the extent that they are relevant to the applications lodged with the Manawatū-Whanganui Regional Council (“Horizons”) The consents applied for, by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency (the “Transport Agency”) are required to authorise the construction, operation and maintenance of the Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway (the “Project”). 2 In addition, the Transport Agency separately applied for a Notice of Requirement (“NoR”) to Palmerston North City Council (“PNCC”), Tararua District Council (“TDC”) and Manawatu District Council (“MDC”). The Environment Court confirmed the designation for the Project, including a more northern alignment (discussed later in this section 87F report), subject to conditions, on 23 March 2020. While this section 87F report only addresses the applications lodged with MWRC, the designation and the associated conditions have also been considered as part of the assessment. 3 This report has been prepared in accordance with section 87F of the RMA which sets out the matters the report must cover.
    [Show full text]
  • No 6, 29 January 1962, 93
    No. 6 93 SUPPLEMENT TO THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE OF THURSDAY, 25 JANUARY 1962 Published by Authority WELLINGTON: MONDAY, 29 JANUARY 1962 NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL REGISTER 1961 94 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 6 MEDICAL COUNCIL E. G. SAYERS, Esq., C.M.G., M.D., CH.B.(N.Z.), F.R.C.P.(LOND.), HON.F.R.C.P.(EDIN.), F.R.A.C.P., HON.F.A.C.P., D.T.M. and H.{LOND.), Chairman. H. B. TURBOTT, Esq., I.S.O., M.B., CH.B.(N.Z.), D.P.H.(N.Z.). Sir DOUGLAS ROBB, C.M.G., M.D., CH.M.(N.Z.), F.R.C.S.(ENG.), L.R.C.P.(LOND.), F.R.A.C.S. J. 0. MERCER, Esq., C.B.E., M.B., CH.B.(N.z.), F.R.C.P.(LOND.), F.R.A.C.P. J. A. D. IVERACH, Esq., M.C., M.B., CH.B.(N.Z.), F.R.C.P.(EDIN.), F.R.A.C.P. C. L. E. L. SHEPPARD, Esq., E.D., B.A., M.B., CH.B.(N.Z.), F.R.C.S.(EDIN.). A. J. MASON, Esq., M.B., CH.M.(N.Z.), F.R.C.S.(ENG.), F.R.A.C.S. SECRETARY K. A. G. HINDES, Esq., P.O. Box 5013, State Fire Insurance Building, Wellington, N.Z., Tel. 47 053 29 JANUARY THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE 95 Medical Register THE following provisions of the Medical Practitioners Act 1950 are published for general information: Subsections (1) and (2) of section 29: Subsection (1)- "The Secretary to the Council shall, as at the thirtieth day of June in the year nineteen hundred and fifty-one and in each year thereafter, prepare a copy of the register of persons who are registered as medical practitioners or conditionally registered under this Act, and shall certify it to be a true copy, and shall cause it to be published in the Gazette as soon as practicable after the thirtieth day of June in the year to which
    [Show full text]
  • Te Ahu a Turanga Cultural Impact Assessment February 2020
    Te Ahu a Turanga Cultural Impact Assessment February 2020 Report prepared for the New Zealand Transport Agency By Ngāti Kahungunu ki Tāmaki nui-a-Rua Trust Kendrick J. L. Jonathan A. Barrett K. Black M. W. Figure 1: Part of the landscape to be affected by the new highway on Stuart Bolton’s farm, Tararua District – Photo J. L. Kendrick. Ngāti Kahungunu ki Tāmaki nui-a-Rua Cultural Impact Assessment Report: Te Ahu a Turanga Project. Prepared by James Kendrick, Alice Jonathan, and Morry Black Use and Reliance - This report has been prepared by Ngāti Kahungunu ki Tāmaki nui-a- Rua. It contains sensitive information and is solely for New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA). Any use or reliance by a third party is at that party's own risk. Ngāti Kahungunu ki Tāmaki nui-a-Rua reserve the right to make amendments to this document for accuracy of content or to address other environmental or cultural issues should they arise, as some of the information supplied by NZTA which the report is based on is subject to change. Page | 2 Ngāti Kahungunu ki Tāmaki nui-a-Rua Final CIA Document February 2020 He Mihi Tēnei au, tenei au Here am I, here am I Te hoki nei i taku tapuwae Here I am swiftly moving by the power of my karakia for Ko te hokai nuku swift movement. Ko te hokai te rani Moving swiftly over the earth, Ko te hokai o te tipuna swiftly through the heavens. A Tane-nui-a-rangi The movement of your ancestor I pikitea ai Tane-nui-a-rangi who climbed up to the isolated Ki te Rangi-tuhaha realms.
    [Show full text]
  • CULTURAL VALUES ASSESSMENT for WOODVILLE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT & PAHIATUA SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
    Rangit ne 0 Tamaki nui a Rua Ine CULTURAL VALUES ASSESSMENT for WOODVILLE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT & PAHIATUA SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT Peter McBurney Auckland November 2014 A Report Commissioned by Rangit ne 0 T maki nui a Rua Contents Contents................................................................................................................3 Table of Figures ....................................................................................................4 Preface...................................................................................................................5 The Author.......................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements............................................................................................. 6 The Commission/Project Brief.............................................................................7 Synopsis .............................................................................................................8 10 Mana Whenua ......................................................................................................... 1 Mana whenua of Tamaki nui Rua 10 Rangit ne 0 a ....................................... 1.1 Whenua................................................................................................... 10 1.2 Awa.......................................................................................................... 11 1.3 Early Rangit ne Traditions......................................................................
    [Show full text]