DOCSLIB.ORG

Genetics Week 8 Resource March 8-12 Hi Everyone! As We Begin Week 8 of Genetics, Many Students Begin to Have Some Trouble with T

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Genetics Week 8 Resource March 8-12 Hi Everyone! As We Begin Week 8 of Genetics, Many Students Begin to Have Some Trouble with T Genetics Week 8 Resource March 8-12 Hi Everyone! As we begin Week 8 of Genetics, many students begin to have some trouble with the material being covered. Take comfort in this: genetics is an EFFORT class!!!If you put in the work, study smart, and push yourself to do your best, I am confident you can finish the course with the grade you want. Keep in mind that the Tutoring Center offers many services that you can take advantage of! Also, make sure you come to Genetics group tutoring, every Tuesday at 6:30-7:30 You can check the Baylor tutoring website (baylor.edu/tutoring) for more information or to schedule a free, private, one-on-one tutoring appointment! Keywords: Translation, Gene Regulation, Operons Review! Chapter 15 The DNA code is degenerate! o 64 possible codons (3 nucleotides that can each be ATCG) but only 20 amino acids o This means that a specific amino acid is coded for by more than one codon How to know how many amino acids come from a gene: Only count the nucleotides between the start and stop codon (including the start codon but NOT the stop codon)- why is that? Hint: think about how translation works! Each amino acid has three nucleotides (codon). Here are some amazing genetics videos made by the tutoring center to help understand the processes of transcription and replication-these are found on the tutoring website! Molecular components of translation: https://youtu.be/l3ayESyldd0 Process of translation: https://youtu.be/J-m2F7V04Kk All figures, diagrams, and information are sourced from Pierce Genetics 7ed, unless otherwise stated. Chapter 16 To the right is a figure from your textbook summarizing the levels of gene regulation you are responsible for. The yellow boxes represent the gene regulation method, while the images between the boxes are the result of that mode of regulation. As you can see, there are several tiers to gene regulation. This is for Eukaryotes! In Bacteria, transcription is usually the most important level of gene regulation (in the form of the operon) What is an operon? A set of structural genes in a bacterial cell along with the promoter, operator, etc. that controls transcription. ONLY in prokaryotes! There are several types of operons: Positive operon. The regulator protein is an activator, when the regulator protein is bound it turns on transcription. Negative operon. The regulator protein is a repressor, when the regulator protein is bound it turns off transcription. Inducible operon Transcription is off until it gets turned on. Repressible operon Transcription is on until it gets turned off. Make sure you can combine positive/negative and inducible/repressible in any combination and be able to answer if the regulator protein is normally bound and if it is normally made in its active state! The lac operon is a common example of a negative inducible operon. All figures, diagrams, and information are sourced from Pierce Genetics 7ed, unless otherwise stated. This operon breaks down lactose for energy under positive control-if lactose is present and there are no mutations, we will make basal levels of permease and beta gel If glucose is in the cell, the bacteria will break that down over lactose so the cell will inhibit the lac operon. For max operation of the lac operon: low glucose, presence of lactose. Chapter 17 Gene Regulation Prokaryotes Both Eukaryotes Operons DNA binding proteins • Chromatin structure influence the ability of RNA • Nuclear membrane polymerase to initiate separates transcription transcription and translation in time and space • Greater diversity of mechanisms for gene regulation (see image above) Regulation of Genes in Eukaryotes Histones DNA Chromosomes • Methylation of • DNA methylation: • DNase Histones: activation/ represses DNA hypersensitive repression of them! • CpG islands: know sites • Acetylation of what constitutes • Chromatin Histones: stimulates them and what they remodeling-does transcription do NOT acetylate histone proteins You will need to know the definitions, functions, and how they work of all of these in the table! Professors love to mix these definitions up on exams so really get these in your head! That’s it for this week! I hope this is useful for you all and please do not hesitate to reach out if you have any questions. Also, remember that past resources can be found and downloaded from the tutoring center website: https://www.baylor.edu/support_programs/index.php?id=967950 All figures, diagrams, and information are sourced from Pierce Genetics 7ed, unless otherwise stated. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dna Methylation Post Transcriptional Modification
    Dna Methylation Post Transcriptional Modification Blistery Benny backbiting her tug-of-war so protectively that Scot barrel very weekends. Solanaceous and unpossessing Eric pubes her creatorships abrogating while Raymundo bereave some limitations demonstrably. Clair compresses his catchings getter epexegetically or epidemically after Bernie vitriols and piffling unchangeably, hypognathous and nourishing. To explore quantitative and dynamic properties of transcriptional regulation by. MeSH Cochrane Library. In revere last check of man series but left house with various gene expression profile of the effect of. Moreover interpretation of transcriptional changes during COVID-19 has been. In transcriptional modification by post transcriptional repression and posted by selective breeding industry: patterns of dna methylation during gc cells and the study of dna. DNA methylation regulates transcriptional homeostasis of. Be local in two ways Post Translational Modifications of amino acid residues of histone. International journal of cyclic gmp in a chromatin dynamics: unexpected results in alternative splicing of reusing and diagnosis of dmrs has been identified using whole process. Dam in dna methylation to violent outbursts that have originated anywhere in england and post transcriptional gene is regulated at the content in dna methylation post transcriptional modification of. A seven sample which customers post being the dtc company for analysis. Fei zhao y, methylation dynamics and modifications on lysine is an essential that. Tag-based our Generation Sequencing. DNA methylation and histone modifications as epigenetic. Thc content of. Lysine methylation has been involved in both transcriptional activation H3K4. For instance aberrance of DNA methylation andor demethylation has been. Chromosome conformation capture from 3C to 5C and will ChIP-based modification.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Methylation, Imprinting and Cancer
    European Journal of Human Genetics (2002) 10, 6±16 ã 2002 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1018-4813/02 $25.00 www.nature.com/ejhg REVIEW DNA methylation, imprinting and cancer Christoph Plass*,1 and Paul D Soloway*,2 1Division of Human Cancer Genetics and the Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, OH 43210, USA; 2Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, NY 14263, USA It is well known that a variety of genetic changes influence the development and progression of cancer. These changes may result from inherited or spontaneous mutations that are not corrected by repair mechanisms prior to DNA replication. It is increasingly clear that so called epigenetic effects that do not affect the primary sequence of the genome also play an important role in tumorigenesis. This was supported initially by observations that cancer genomes undergo changes in their methylation state and that control of parental allele-specific methylation and expression of imprinted loci is lost in several cancers. Many loci acquiring aberrant methylation in cancers have since been identified and shown to be silenced by DNA methylation. In many cases, this mechanism of silencing inactivates tumour suppressors as effectively as frank mutation and is one of the cancer-predisposing hits described in Knudson's two hit hypothesis. In contrast to mutations which are essentially irreversible, methylation changes are reversible, raising the possibility of developing therapeutics based on restoring the normal methylation state to cancer-associated genes. Development of such therapeutics will require identifying loci undergoing methylation changes in cancer, understanding how their methylation influences tumorigenesis and identifying the mechanisms regulating the methylation state of the genome.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Implications of DNA Methylation in Adipose Biology
    Diabetes Volume 68, May 2019 871 Functional Implications of DNA Methylation in Adipose Biology Xiang Ma and Sona Kang Diabetes 2019;68:871–878 | https://doi.org/10.2337/dbi18-0057 The twin epidemics of obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) variants have not been tested for causality, and even if are a serious health, social, and economic issue. The proven causal, they cannot fully explain many clinical dysregulation of adipose tissue biology is central to the features such as high heritability, high discordance in adult development of these two metabolic disorders, as adi- monozygotic twins, and the close relationship with envi- pose tissue plays a pivotal role in regulating whole-body ronmental factors (2–5). Therefore, it has long been metabolism and energy homeostasis (1). Accumulating speculated that nongenetic variation, such as epigenetic evidence indicates that multiple aspects of adipose bi- alterations, plays a role in pathogenesis. This notion has PERSPECTIVES IN DIABETES ology are regulated, in part, by epigenetic mechanisms. been borne out by a recent epigenome-wide association The precise and comprehensive understanding of the study that linked alterations in DNA methylation to whole- epigenetic control of adipose tissue biology is crucial to body insulin sensitivity (6). identifying novel therapeutic interventions that target DNA methylation is a reversible epigenetic mark in- epigenetic issues. Here, we review the recent findings volving the covalent transfer of a methyl group to the C-5 on DNA methylation events and machinery in regulating the developmental processes and metabolic function of position of a cytosine residue by DNA methyltransferases adipocytes. We highlight the following points: 1) DNA (DNMTs), usually in the context of a cytosine-guanine methylation is a key epigenetic regulator of adipose dinucleotide (CpG) doublet.
    [Show full text]
  • Cpg Islands and the Regulation of Transcription
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 24, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW CpG islands and the regulation of transcription Aime´e M. Deaton and Adrian Bird1 The Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, United Kingdom Vertebrate CpG islands (CGIs) are short interspersed DNA In spite of their link with transcription, the functional sequences that deviate significantly from the average significance of CGIs is only just beginning to emerge. CGI genomic pattern by being GC-rich, CpG-rich, and pre- promoters turn out to have distinctive patterns of tran- dominantly nonmethylated. Most, perhaps all, CGIs are scription initiation and chromatin configuration. Their sites of transcription initiation, including thousands that regulation involves proteins (some of which specifically are remote from currently annotated promoters. Shared bind nonmethylated CpG) that influence the modifica- DNA sequence features adapt CGIs for promoter function tion status of CGI chromatin. In addition, the CpG moieties by destabilizing nucleosomes and attracting proteins that themselves are sometimes subject to cytosine methylation, create a transcriptionally permissive chromatin state. which correlates with stable shutdown of the associated Silencing of CGI promoters is achieved through dense promoter. Here we examine the properties shared by ver- CpG methylation or polycomb recruitment, again using tebrate CGIs and how transcription is regulated at these their distinctive DNA sequence composition. CGIs are sites. Recent related reviews include Illingworth and Bird therefore generically equipped to influence local chroma- (2009), Mohn and Schubeler (2009), and Blackledge and tin structure and simplify regulation of gene activity. Klose (2011). Vertebrate genomes are methylated predominantly at the Evolutionary conservation of CGIs dinucleotide CpG, and consequently are CpG-deficient owing to the mutagenic properties of methylcytosine CGIs are distinct in vertebrates due to their lack of DNA (Coulondre et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics and Function of DNA Methylation in Plants
    REVIEWS Dynamics and function of DNA methylation in plants Huiming Zhang1,2*, Zhaobo Lang1,2 and Jian- Kang Zhu 1,2,3* Abstract | DNA methylation is a conserved epigenetic modification that is important for gene regulation and genome stability. Aberrant patterns of DNA methylation can lead to plant developmental abnormalities. A specific DNA methylation state is an outcome of dynamic regulation by de novo methylation, maintenance of methylation and active demethylation, which are catalysed by various enzymes that are targeted by distinct regulatory pathways. In this Review, we discuss DNA methylation in plants, including methylating and demethylating enzymes and regulatory factors, and the coordination of methylation and demethylation activities by a so- called methylstat mechanism; the functions of DNA methylation in regulating transposon silencing, gene expression and chromosome interactions; the roles of DNA methylation in plant development; and the involvement of DNA methylation in plant responses to biotic and abiotic stress conditions. DNA methylation at the 5ʹ position of cytosine contrib- and regulatory factors are generally not lethal. However, utes to the epigenetic regulation of nuclear gene expres- DNA methylation appears to be more crucial for devel- sion and to genome stability1,2. Epigenetic changes, opment and environmental- stress responses in plants including DNA methylation, histone modifications and that have more complex genomes. Recent findings histone variants and some non- coding RNA (ncRNA) have uncovered important
    [Show full text]
  • Simplified Methylrad Sequencing to Detect Changes in DNA
    epigenomes Article Simplified MethylRAD Sequencing to Detect Changes in DNA Methylation at Enhancer Elements in Differentiating Embryonic Stem Cells Debapriya Saha 1 , Allison B. Norvil 1, Nadia A. Lanman 2,3 and Humaira Gowher 1,2,* 1 Department of Biochemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; [email protected] (D.S.); [email protected] (A.B.N.) 2 Purdue University Center for Cancer Research, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Comparative Pathobiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 13 August 2020; Accepted: 28 September 2020; Published: 1 October 2020 Abstract: Differential DNA methylation is characteristic of gene regulatory regions, such as enhancers, which mostly constitute low or intermediate CpG content in their DNA sequence. Consequently, quantification of changes in DNA methylation at these sites is challenging. Given that DNA methylation across most of the mammalian genome is maintained, the use of genome-wide bisulfite sequencing to measure fractional changes in DNA methylation at specific sites is an overexertion which is both expensive and cumbersome. Here, we developed a MethylRAD technique with an improved experimental plan and bioinformatic analysis tool to examine regional DNA methylation changes in embryonic stem cells (ESCs) during differentiation. The transcriptional silencing of pluripotency genes (PpGs) during ESC differentiation is accompanied by PpG enhancer (PpGe) silencing mediated by the demethylation of H3K4me1 by LSD1. Our MethylRAD data show that in the presence of LSD1 inhibitor, a significant fraction of LSD1-bound PpGe fails to gain DNA methylation. We further show that this effect is mostly observed in PpGes with low/intermediate CpG content.
    [Show full text]
  • A Second DNA Methyltransferase Repair Enzyme in Escherichia Coli (Ada-Alb Operon Deletion/O'-Methylguanine/04-Methylthyne/Suicide Enzyme) G
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 85, pp. 3039-3043, May 1988 Genetics A second DNA methyltransferase repair enzyme in Escherichia coli (ada-alB operon deletion/O'-methylguanine/04-methylthyne/suicide enzyme) G. WILLIAM REBECK, SUSAN COONS, PATRICK CARROLL, AND LEONA SAMSON* Charles A. Dana Laboratory of Toxicology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115 Communicated by Elkan R. Blout, December 28, 1987 (receivedfor review November 9, 1987) ABSTRACT The Escherichia coli ada-akB operon en- ada gene encodes a 39-kDa DNA methyltransferase with two codes a 39-kDa protein (Ada) that is a DNA-repair methyl- active sites, one that removes methyl groups from O6- transferase and a 27-kDa protein (AlkB) of unknown function. methylguanine (06-MeGua) or 04-methylthymine (04- By DNA blot hybridization analysis we show that the alkyla- MeThy) and one that removes methyl groups from methyl tion-sensitive E. cofi mutant BS23 [Sedgwick, B. & Lindahl, T. phosphotriester lesions (7, 12-15). The Ada protein is one of (1982) J. Mol. Biol. 154, 169-1751 is a deletion mutant lacking several gene products to be induced as E. coli adapt to the entire ada-aik operon. Despite the absence ofthe ada gene become alkylation-resistant upon exposure to low doses of and its product, the cells contain detectable levels of a DNA- alkylating agents (3, 12, 13). The repair of methyl phospho- repair methyltransferase activity. We conclude that the meth- triester lesions converts the Ada protein into a positive yltransferase in BS23 cells is the product of a gene other than regulator ofthe ada gene, and this adaptive response (16) and ada.
    [Show full text]
  • The Key Role of DNA Methylation and Histone Acetylation in Epigenetics of Atherosclerosis
    J Lipid Atheroscler. 2020 Sep;9(3):419-434 Journal of https://doi.org/10.12997/jla.2020.9.3.419 Lipid and pISSN 2287-2892·eISSN 2288-2561 Atherosclerosis Review The Key Role of DNA Methylation and Histone Acetylation in Epigenetics of Atherosclerosis Han-Teo Lee ,1,2,* Sanghyeon Oh ,1,2,* Du Hyun Ro ,1,2,3,* Hyerin Yoo ,1,2 Yoo-Wook Kwon 4,5 1Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea 2Interdisciplinary Program in Stem Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea 4Strategic Center of Cell and Bio Therapy for Heart, Diabetes & Cancer, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea Received: May 8, 2020 5Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea Revised: Sep 14, 2020 Accepted: Sep 15, 2020 Correspondence to ABSTRACT Yoo-Wook Kwon Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National Atherosclerosis, which is the most common chronic disease of the coronary artery, constitutes University Hospital, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno- a vascular pathology induced by inflammation and plaque accumulation within arterial vessel gu, Seoul 03080, Korea. E-mail: [email protected] walls. Both DNA methylation and histone modifications are epigenetic changes relevant for atherosclerosis. Recent studies have shown that the DNA methylation and histone *Han-Teo Lee, Sanghyeon Oh and Du Hyun Ro modification systems are closely interrelated and mechanically dependent on each other. contributed equally to this work. Herein, we explore the functional linkage between these systems, with a particular emphasis Copyright © 2020 The Korean Society of Lipid on several recent findings suggesting that histone acetylation can help in targeting DNA and Atherosclerosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Inhibition of EZH2 Prevents Fibrosis and Restores Normal Angiogenesis in Scleroderma
    Inhibition of EZH2 prevents fibrosis and restores normal angiogenesis in scleroderma Pei-Suen Tsoua, Phillip Campbella, M. Asif Amina, Patrick Coita, Shaylynn Millera, David A. Foxa, Dinesh Khannaa,b, and Amr H. Sawalhaa,c,1 aDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; bScleroderma Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; and cCenter for Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Edited by Lawrence Steinman, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, and approved December 20, 2018 (received for review July 30, 2018) Scleroderma (SSc) is a complex disease that involves activation of EGFR and PDGFR pathways through up-regulation of PTEN the immune system, vascular complications, and tissue fibrosis. The (8, 16). In addition, miR-132, MeCP2, and EZH2 operate in histone methyltransferase enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) regulatory epigenetic relay pathways that result in transcriptional mediates trimethylation of lysine 27 of histone 3 (H3K27me3), which repression of PPARγ, ultimately leading to stimulation of myofi- acts as a repressive epigenetic mark. Both EZH2 and H3K27me3 were broblast transdifferentiation (17, 19). elevated in SSc dermal fibroblasts and endothelial cells compared In this study, we focused on the involvement of EZH2 in SSc with healthy controls. EZH2 inhibitor DZNep halted fibrosis both in angiogenesis and fibrosis, utilizing dermal ECs and fibroblasts vitro and in vivo. In SSc fibroblasts, DZNep dose-dependently reduced isolated from healthy controls and SSc patients. We first estab- the expression of profibrotic genes and inhibited migratory activity lished the expression profile of EZH2 in both cell types in SSc, of SSc fibroblasts.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Transcription Complexes in the Formation of the Basal Methylation Pattern in Early Development
    Role of transcription complexes in the formation of the basal methylation pattern in early development Razi Greenfielda,1, Amalia Tabiba,1, Ilana Kesheta, Joshua Mossa, Ofra Sabaga, Alon Gorenb, and Howard Cedara,2 aDepartment of Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 91120 Jerusalem, Israel; and bDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 Edited by Kevin Struhl, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, and approved September 4, 2018 (received for review March 21, 2018) Following erasure in the blastocyst, the entire genome undergoes identical, to that of the preimplantation embryo (ICM) (4, 10) de novo methylation at the time of implantation, with CpG islands were chosen to scientifically evaluate the role of DNA methyl- being protected from this process. This bimodal pattern is then ation itself, independent of other variables. preserved throughout development and the lifetime of the Using this dual cell-culture system, it was now possible to ask organism. Using mouse embryonic stem cells as a model system, whether it is indeed positioning of the transcription machinery we demonstrate that the binding of an RNA polymerase complex before implantation that determines what regions will be pro- on DNA before de novo methylation is predictive of it being tected from subsequent de novo methylation. To this end, we protected from this modification, and tethering experiments used an antibody against RNA polymerase (RNAP II) to carry demonstrate that the presence of this complex is, in fact, sufficient out ChIP-sequencing (Seq) in the unmethylated TKO ES cells to prevent methylation at these sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Cytosine Methylation Does Not Affect Binding of Transcription Factor Spl (DNA Methylation/Metaliothionein Gene Expression/"GC Box") MAUREEN A
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 85, pp. 2066-2070, April 1988 Biochemistry Cytosine methylation does not affect binding of transcription factor Spl (DNA methylation/metaliothionein gene expression/"GC box") MAUREEN A. HARRINGTON*, PETER A. JONES*, MASAYOSHI IMAGAWAt, AND MICHAEL KARINt *Department of Biochemistry and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90033; and tSchool of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 Communicated by Peter B. Dervan, November 23, 1987 (received for review June 9, 1987) ABSTRACT DNA methylation may be a component of a the methylation signal. What remains unclear, however, is multilevel control mechanism that regulates eukaryotic gene whether methylation also alters the direct binding of specific expression. We used synthetic oligonucleotides to investigate transcription factors to defined promoter elements. the effect of cytosine methylation on the binding of the Tjian and coworkers originally described (14-16) and transcription factor Spl to its target sequence (a G+C-rich subsequently purified from HeLa cell nuclear extracts (17) a sequence known as a "GC box"). Concatemers of double- transcription factor, Spl, that specifically recognizes the stranded 14-mers containing a GC box successfully competed simian virus 40 early promoter. Subsequent studies revealed with the human metallothionein iHA promoter for binding to the decanucleotide consensus Spl binding sequence to be Spl in DNase I protection experiments. The presence of 5- methylcytosine in the CpG sequence of the GC box did not 5' TCGGCGGGGC 3' (the "GC box"). GC boxes have influence Spl binding. The result was confirmed using double- been identified in the 5' region of several eukaryotic genes, stranded 20-mers containing 16 base pairs of complementary including the human metallothionein (hMT) IIA, IA, and IB sequence.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Methylation in Solid Tumors: Functions and Methods of Detection
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review DNA Methylation in Solid Tumors: Functions and Methods of Detection Andrea Martisova , Jitka Holcakova , Nasim Izadi , Ravery Sebuyoya, Roman Hrstka and Martin Bartosik * Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic; [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (J.H.); [email protected] (N.I.); [email protected] (R.S.); [email protected] (R.H.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: DNA methylation, i.e., addition of methyl group to 50-carbon of cytosine residues in CpG dinucleotides, is an important epigenetic modification regulating gene expression, and thus implied in many cellular processes. Deregulation of DNA methylation is strongly associated with onset of various diseases, including cancer. Here, we review how DNA methylation affects carcinogenesis process and give examples of solid tumors where aberrant DNA methylation is often present. We explain principles of methods developed for DNA methylation analysis at both single gene and whole genome level, based on (i) sodium bisulfite conversion, (ii) methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes, and (iii) interactions of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) with methyl-binding proteins or antibodies against 5mC. In addition to standard methods, we describe recent advances in next generation sequencing technologies applied to DNA methylation analysis, as well as in development of biosensors that represent their cheaper and faster alternatives. Most importantly, we highlight not only advantages, Citation: Martisova, A.; Holcakova, but also disadvantages and challenges of each method. J.; Izadi, N.; Sebuyoya, R.; Hrstka, R.; Bartosik, M. DNA Methylation in Keywords: DNA methylation; epigenetic modification; tumor; tumorigenesis; bisulfite conversion; Solid Tumors: Functions and restriction enzyme; DNA biosensor Methods of Detection.
    [Show full text]