DOCSLIB.ORG

Celebrating Clayton Utz We Have Undergone Many Changes Since Then

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Celebrating Clayton Utz We Have Undergone Many Changes Since Then CELEBRATING Clayton Utz We have undergone many changes since then. However the essence of Clayton Utz, expressed in the personal qualities of our founding father George Robert Nichols, remains very much the same. Among his many virtues, Nichols was known for his legal astuteness, his passion for justice, and his desire to improve his community. These are qualities for which Clayton Utz is still known, and it is with great pride that we reflect on the contribution that George Robert Nichols and the individuals who followed in his footsteps have made in making Clayton Utz the firm we are today. In an increasingly competitive legal market, Clayton Utz consistently stands out for the quality of our legal work and our people. Our commitment to the community is also an important part of who we are, and we are proud of our Community Connect program which reaches out to hundreds of individuals and organisations across the country through pro bono legal work, financial assistance through grants, and volunteering. We thank our people for their ongoing support of the program, and for the investment they have made and continue to make in our firm. In celebrating 175 years of legal service to the Australian community, One hundred and seventy five years ago, the we also acknowledge the enormous contribution of the many people who over the years have helped to build the Clayton Utz community. foundations were laid for what today is one From a one-man firm in colonial Sydney, we are now a truly national of Australia’s greatest law firms - our firm, firm with 216 partners and over 950 lawyers in six offices around Australia, servicing the needs of our many valued and loyal clients whenever - and wherever - they are doing business. We thank and acknowledge the support of these clients, who continue to make us Clayton Utz their law firm of choice. We are proud to be a part of Clayton Utz and look Linda Evans David Fagan forward to further progress of the firm as it enters its Board Chair Chief Executive Partner next 175 years. 1 A legal pioneer George Robert Nichols was a son of the colony’s first postmaster and the first our history native-born Australian to be admitted as a solicitor in New South Wales. Nichols was a complex and intriguing man, whose great passion for life and for 1833 - 1920 social causes was offset by a cool legal mind and an endearing personal charm. Upon being admitted to practice, Nichols established his own one-man practice In 1833 a young man with passion and vision in Pitt Street and began to build a reputation for his “disciplined legal astuteness, was admitted to legal practice. That man laid the which subsequently placed him far before any of his professional competitors”. foundations for what would become one of Australia’s The practice grew steadily and George took on a partner, John Williams, in 1842, with whom he remained in partnership for many years. leading law firms - our firm,Clayton Utz. A thriving legal practice was not enough for Nichols’ energy and drive. He became a forceful and far-sighted advocate for the advancement of early colonial society, and he entered into journalism. His editorship of The Australian began in the “Before the commencement of the business of the Supreme Court late 1830s and for years he adroitly juggled the twin responsibilities of law and on Monday, Mr Wentworth moved that Mr G R Nichols might commerce. He used the broadsheet to promote self-government for the colony, the be admitted as an Attorney of that Court. abolition of the transportation of convicts to New South Wales, and the integration Chief Justice (The Hon. Francis Forbes) - Let George Robert Nichols, of emancipated convicts into civil society. He also argued against the separation of the legal profession into barristers and solicitors. His desire to improve the society gentleman, be enrolled as an Attorney of this Honourable Court. in which he lived led him to enter Parliament in 1848. I believe, Mr Nichols, you are the first Australian that has been admitted in this Court. Nichols thus lived three public lives - lawyer, journalist and politician - and he Mr Nichols - I am, your Honor. threw himself into all three with determination and imagination. His early death in Chief Justice - The Court feel (sic) much pleasure in admitting you.” 1857 robbed colonial Sydney of one of its most notable figures. Extract from The Sydney Morning Herald, 1 July 1833 1833 1842 1857 1872 Our founding father George Nichols & Williams established. George Robert Nichols dies. Driver & Merriman formed. Robert Nichols admitted to practice Richard Driver acquires his practice. in NSW. 2 Nichols & Williams Driver & Merriman partnership with his father, the practice becoming known as John H. Clayton & Son. In 1842, Nichols entered into partnership with In 1872, George Merriman joined Driver to form John Williams. Nichols & Williams occupied premises Driver & Merriman. They went their separate ways in Legal practice was certainly very different in those at 61 Pitt Street, where the firm would stay for 1876. Merriman entered NSW Parliament in 1887 but days. One of the firm’s early partners, William Percy 52 years. Williams later became Crown Solicitor, a his health failed after a couple of years. Walters, recalled that in 1918 the firm had one position he held for 31 years. He also served as the telephone which was fixed to the wall of the client’s first President of what is now the Law Society of The first Clayton waiting room, which also served as the office boys’ New South Wales. office. At that time John H. Clayton & Son had a John Horatio Clayton was the first Clayton of staff of seven. Upon Nichols’ death in 1857, his practice was Clayton Utz. He was articled to Richard Driver, and acquired by Richard Driver, who had been articled admitted as a solicitor in 1879. Driver held Clayton Hector J.R. Clayton served in World War I and, on his to Nichols & Williams. The practice thrived under in such high regard that he left him his legal practice return in December 1919, his father retired from active Driver’s leadership. Among its notable clients was upon his death. Clayton excelled at the law and practice. John Horatio Clayton died at his home at the Tattersall’s Club, for which Driver drafted its first shared Driver’s love of cricket. He conducted the Arncliffe on 18 May 1925, aged 70. constitution and of which he became Chairman. practice in his own name - John H. Clayton - from the same premises. Driver’s love of cricket involved him in the preservation of Sydney Common, which became In 1894, John H. Clayton moved the firm to the Centennial Park and Moore Park. Driver Avenue, newly-built City Bank Chambers at 164 Pitt Street, in front of the Sydney Cricket Ground, was named between King and Pitt Streets. This was to be the in Driver’s honour. Some 148 years later, Clayton Utz firm’s home until 1920. George Robert Nichols Richard Driver John Horatio Clayton counts the Centennial & Moore Park Trusts among its clients. Driver died in 1880 and the New South Clayton took Percy John Pratt as a partner in Wales Parliament, the Water Police Court and the 1896 to form Clayton & Pratt, before Pratt moved Central Police Court were all adjourned for a day as a to Wollongong in 1909 as a sole practitioner. “I give, devise and bequeath unto John Horatio mark of respect. In 1911, Clayton’s son Hector Joseph Richard Clayton..... my business of a Solicitor....” Clayton was admitted to practice and went into First clause of the Last Will and Testament of Richard Driver, 1880 1880 1896 1911 1920 John Horatio Clayton inherits Clayton & Pratt formed. John H. Clayton’s son Hector John H. Clayton & Son merges with the firm Driver’s practice. Renames it Joseph Richard Clayton is admitted of Harold Stewart (“Barney”) Utz, Mackenzie John H. Clayton. to practice. John H. Clayton and Mackenzie, to become Clayton & Utz. & Son formed. The firm relocates to the Bank of New South Wales Chambers at 280 Castlereagh Street. 3 Clayton meets Utz John H. Clayton & Son occupied the same floor of City Bank Chambers our history as the practice of Harold Stewart Utz, known as Mackenzie and Mackenzie, Solicitors. 1920 - 1983 In 1920 the two firms merged to form Clayton & Utz and relocated to Bank of New South Wales Chambers at 280 Castlereagh Street. In 1924, the firm became Clayton Utz & Company with the admission to the partnership of Roy Leverton Head and Walter George Tester, who had Roy Leverton Head both been articled to Clayton & Utz. Some nine years later, the size of the practice meant a move to new premises - Derwent House at 136 Liverpool Street. This remained the firm’s home for the next 43 years. An era of steady growth: the post-war years In the years following World War II, Clayton Utz & Company grew in both size and expertise. In 1951, Andrew Midwood Clayton (a son of Walter George Tester Hector J.R. Clayton) and Peter Stewart Utz (son of Harold Stewart Utz) were among those who joined the partnership. By the early 1970s, the firm had 12 partners and over 100 staff. As the 80s dawned, Clayton Utz & Company had truly become a full service firm, specialising in banking and finance, corporate, commercial property and litigation work, for predominantly corporate and commercial clients. 1924 1933 1951 1958 The firm changes its name to The firm relocates to Derwent Andrew Midwood Clayton (a son of Harold Stewart (“Barney”) Utz dies.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Some Queensland Memoir Writer^
    Some Queensland Memoir Writer^. Presidential Address, by F. W. S. CUMBRAE-STEWART, B.A., B.O.L. At Annual Meeting of the Historical Society of Queensland, Friday, 30th August, 1918. Five years have passed since the inaugural meeting of this Society was held under the chairmanship of His Excellency, Sir William Macgregor, then Governor of Queensland and patron of the Society. During the time which has elapsed much history has been made, and the events which have shaken the world have not been favourable to quiet historical research, and I think that the Society must be congratulated on having maintained its existence in spite of so much that has hindered its work. Other difficulties overshadowed us. Before the first year had passed several of our members had died, and Sir William Macgregor had completed his useful and unstinted official service to the Empire. His retirement from the Governorship of Queensland removed him from us to his native;land. None of us who were privileged to be present will forget that morning when, on 15th July, 1914, he said farewell to us. Then came the war, which the wise had foretold, but the foolish ones had thought- was impossible. At one time the question of suspending the Society's operations was considered, but it was decided to carry on. When Sir Wm. Macgregor's successor arrived, he gave very ready and material help by taking the Society under his patronage. There are Others who have passed from our midst whose places we can never fill. Each year has added its toll.
    [Show full text]
  • THE OZHARVEST EFFECT Adelaide Brisbane Gold Coast Melbourne
    OzHarvest Book of Thanks 2016 THE OZHARVEST EFFECT The OzHarvest Effect can only be achieved thanks to a massive team effort made up of devoted staff, passionate chefs and ambassadors, like-minded partners, generous food and financial donors and the every growing ‘yellow army’ of volunteers. We love and appreciate everyone who is part of this special family and have made every effort to ensure we list all involved. As you can see, the list is very long and we apologise if someone has been overlooked. Please contact us at OzHarvest HQ on 1800 108 006 to ensure we capture you in our next Book of Thanks. Adelaide advisory Amanda Dalton-Winks / Anne Duncan / Harriette Huis in’t Veld / Hayley Everuss / Jason James / Sharyn Booth / Vicki Cirillo COrporate Volunteer AMP / AON Risk Solutions / Aussie / Biogen / BUPA / Caltex / Commonwealth Bank / Country Health SA / Deloitte / Department of Environment / Govenor’s Leadership Foundation Program / KPMG / Mental Illness Fellowship / Michels Warren / O-I Glass / Olympus / Paxus / People’s Choice Credit Union / The University of Adelaide / Victor Harbour Childcare Centre Vodafone / Tropcorp / SA Power Networks / Santos / Uni SA / Woolworths FINANCIAL DONOR 30 Grosvenor Street Pty Ltd as Trustee for FWH Foundation / A Touch of Beauty / Accounting Buddy / Adam Delaine / Adam Wittwer / Adelaide Cellar Door Wine Festival / Adelaide Fuel and Safety / Adelaide Sustainability Centre / Adelaide Youth Courts / Adrian Dipilato / Adrian M Hinton / Albert Bensimon / Ali Roush / Amanda Dalton-Winks / Andrew John
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Porter
    Article Talk Read View source View history Search Wikipedia Christian Porter From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) at 17:14, 25 February 2021 (Add: work. Removed parameters. Main page Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by AManWithNoPlan | Pages linked from Contents cached User:AManWithNoPlan/sandbox2 | via #UCB_webform_linked 268/1473). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this Current events revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision. Random article (diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) About Wikipedia Contact us For the singer, see The Voice (U.S. season 4). Donate Charles Christian Porter (born 11 July 1970) is an Australian Liberal Party politician and Contribute The Honourable lawyer serving as Attorney-General of Australia since 2017, and has served as Member of Christian Porter Help Parliament (MP) for Pearce since 2013. He was appointed Minister for Industrial Relations MP Learn to edit and Leader of the House in 2019. Community portal Recent changes From Perth, Porter attended Hale School, the University of Western Australia and later the Upload file London School of Economics, and practised law at Clayton Utz and taught law at the University of Western Australia before his election to parliament. He is the son of the 1956 Tools Olympic silver medallist, Charles "Chilla" Porter, and the grandson of Queensland Liberal What links here politician, Charles Porter, who was a member of the Queensland Legislative Assembly from Related changes [4][5] Special pages 1966 to 1980.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter of the Blue Mountains Association of Cultural Heritage Organisations Inc May-June 2021 ISSUE 74 ISSN 2203-4366
    Heritage Newsletter of the Blue Mountains Association of Cultural Heritage Organisations Inc May-June 2021 ISSUE 74 ISSN 2203-4366 Acknowledgement of Country BMACHO acknowledges and pays respect to the past, present and future Traditional Custodians and Elders of this nation and the continuation of cultural, spiritual and educational practices of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Sir Francis Forbes, first Chief Justice of NSW (1784-1841) Sir Francis Forbes was the first Chief Justice of New South Wales, appointed to oversee the reform of the administration of law and order in the colony of New South Wales, following the inquiry into the colony's affairs by Commissioner Bigge and Bigge’s subsequent reports of 1822 and 1823. Bigge's investigations began in 1819 following the far reaching changes made in the Colony by Governor Lachlan Macquarie. Before Forbes set up the court system in Australia, people were tried by legal tribunals. Bigge was keen to grant greater jurisdiction to the Local Courts which had previously been administered from England. In the early 1830s Sir Francis Forbes owned the only estate west of the Nepean River, at Emu Plains. Forbes was granted 120 acres at Emu Plains and also 2,560 acres in the Upper Hunter Valley. This land at Muswellbrook, was increased by purchase and used as a cattle run known as Skellatar (Skellater). Edinglassie, Emu Plains, by Conrad Martens 1835 The Edinglassie (or Edenglassie) land grant was at the southern end of Emu Plains, south of Jamison Creek, and upstream from the Emu Plains prison farm, being named after one of 1 HERITAGE May-June 2021 the Forbes family estates in Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hon Tf Bathurst Chief Justice
    THE HON T F BATHURST CHIEF JUSTICE OF NEW SOUTH WALES FRANCIS FORBES SOCIETY AUSTRALIAN LEGAL HISTORY ‘A TOUGH NUT TO CRACK’1: THE HISTORY OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION IN NEW SOUTH WALES THURSDAY 19 SEPTEMBER 2019* INTRODUCTION 1. I would like to begin by respectfully acknowledging the traditional custodians of the land on which we meet, the Gadigal people of the Eora nation, and pay my respects to their Elders, past, present and emerging. As I will discuss later in this tutorial, the first legal system in Australia belonged to that of Australia’s Indigenous people. We acknowledge and respect the ongoing laws and customs of the traditional custodians of this land. 2. If any of you are here to hear about the development of the law of New South Wales or the history of its courts, you are sure to be disappointed. To console you there will be plenty of these lectures during the Court’s bicentenary in a few years’ time. This speech is about the profession itself, not the law, Courts or judiciary. 3. A traditional view of the advent of the legal profession in New South Wales would focus exclusively on the advent of solicitors, both free and former- convict, and barristers in the emerging penal Colony. However, far too often we conflate the start of the legal profession in New South Wales with the start of the legal profession for men. The advent of the legal profession for women did not occur until over a century later, and regrettably, even later for Australia’s Indigenous peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • The Law at War 1914 – 1915
    The Law at War 1914 – 1915 Engaged to Act on Another Front A Working Paper describing the actions of Members of the New South Wales Legal Profession on Gallipoli Tony Cunneen BA MA Dip Ed [email protected] Acknowledgements As with any writing project there are a multitude of people who have assisted with the research. My thanks go to Sir Laurence Street, Peter Marinovic of the Red Cross archives, , The Forbes Society for Legal History, the staff at Willoughby Library who cheerfully tracked down the most obscure books and theses with great patience Introduction Legal history is not simply the accumulation of cases, decisions and statutes. Around this framework swirl the private lives of the solicitors, barristers, judges, clerks and associated professionals who worked in the law. A profession gains part of its character from the private lives and experiences of its early members. Through its professional ancestors the New South Wales legal fraternity is connected to a range of institutions – everything from sporting groups, schools, universities and churches. One significant group has been the military. In World War One all of these eleemnet came togher. Men who had been at the same school, worshipped at teh samechruch, 2 shared the space at the law courts, walked the corridors of chambers, had garden parties overlooking the harbour and caught the same trams and ferries home found themselves next to one another in strange exotic fields when the bullets flew and ordinary soldiers looked to the privileged officers for leadership. While the battles raged, in Australia the mothers, wives an sisters of the soldiers gave countless hours to preparing packages for their menfolk, or organising fundraising, or tracking done details of their fates.
    [Show full text]
  • In 1963, When He Was Already a Senior Lecturer in Law at The
    Australian Journal of Legal History (2003) Vol 7 37 ALEX CASTLES ON THE RECEPTION OF ENGLISH LAW BRUCE KERCHER* In 1963, when he was already a Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Adelaide, Alex Castles wrote his first important legal history article, called ‘The Reception and Status of English Law in Australia’.1 It was very much a creature of its intellectual times, but, particularly in its discussion of American law, it also showed something of the Alex Castles to come. In this paper, I intend to trace his views on the area which I think is his central interest, the reception and rejection of Englishness in Australian law. The argument of Alex’s article, so far as it related to Australia, was in the positivist tradition which was so dominant at the time it was written. With positivism came an attachment to England as the source of both the authority of Australian law and its fundamental contents. In the first paragraph, the article stated that ‘Up to the time of their settlement each of the Australian States has the same legal history as Britain. The basic sources of law in both countries are the same.’ There was no hint that the Aboriginal peoples of Australian might have had laws which were displaced by the actions and decisions of the British. Nor does the article question the notion that Australia was peacefully settled among a scattering of native peoples, but of course no lawyers, academic or otherwise, questioned these assumptions in 1963. This article tells the official story of the reception of English law, one in which law- making powers, and the bulk of the law, were essentially English and trickled downwards to the colonies.
    [Show full text]
  • 2300-Forbes Flyer DEC03-5
    ForbesForbes FlyerFlyer THE NEWSLETTER OF THE FRANCIS FORBES SOCIETY FOR AUSTRALIAN LEGAL HISTORY ISSUE 3 DECEMBER 2003 History reports itself Making History It is a curious aspect of contemporary culture that the Australian Investigating the South public venerate their sporting heroes and pop idols with such Australian Independent Bar* enthusiasm but spare little thought the men and women who make a significant contribution to government or public service. Of the 150 or so barristers in That is not to say that other nations do not celebrate sporting South Australia, John Emerson or cultural achievements, but in Europe, Canada and America hopes to interview around 100 there is also a certain ethos reserved for great political and legal of them to gain the broadest figures that arguably adds much to the national life. possible perspective for the book The oddity of it is that lack of interest is no explanation. he is writing on the history of the Biographies of the significant politicians or judges of the United South Australian Independent Bar. States of America and Great Britain frequently grace Australian A chance meeting with Justice bookshelves, and names like Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr and Lord John Emerson Tom Gray in 2001 led to discussion Denning have resonance all over the globe. Such is the interest about the history of the Chief in these figures that they have developed their own legend Justices of South Australia, which John was subsequently beyond the community of lawyers. As I write I can be confident commissioned to write (through the John Bray Law that historians somewhere are industriously re-visiting earlier Chapter of the Alumni Association of the University of works and revising, re-interpreting and re-writing the lives and Adelaide).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 JUDGE WILLIS, BONJON and the RECOGNITION of ABORIGINAL LAW. Janine Rizzetti Introduction the Case of R V Bonjon Could Have
    JUDGE WILLIS, BONJON AND THE RECOGNITION OF ABORIGINAL LAW. Janine Rizzetti Introduction The case of R v Bonjon could have been one of the foundational cases in Indigenous legal autonomy. It touched on all the big early 19th century legal questions regarding Indigenous Australians: the legal status of British settlement, whether Aborigines could be said to have their own law, and whether British law applied in crimes committed between Aboriginal people themselves. It could, too, have been the most significant case in the career of Mr Justice John Walpole Willis. But it was to be neither a foundational case, nor a career highlight. Instead, if R v Bonjon is known at all, it exists as an aberration, quickly over-ruled at the time, and often referred to in passing or even consigned to a footnote in later discussions of the amenability of Indigenous Australians to British law. The case was heard in September 1841 before Willis in his capacity as the first resident Supreme Court judge for the district of Port Phillip, known as Victoria since 1851. Willis, who is best known for his irascibility and subsequent dismissal from office was perceived, both at the time and later, to be no particular friend to Aboriginal people. Yet in Bonjon Willis expressed an argument that was to have resonances in the Mabo decision and Paul Keating’s Redfern Address- both in 1992. In a departure from the judgment given by others in The Crown v Murrell five years earlier, Willis argued that the Supreme Court had no jurisdiction over crimes committed by Aborigines against one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Alfred Stephen.Pdf
    2447 BOOK REVIEW Sir Alfred Stephen: Third Chief Justice of New South Wales 1844-1873 By J.M. Bennett (Lives of the Australian Chief Justices series). Australian Bar Review The Hon. Michael Kirby AC CMG AUSTRALIAN BAR REVIEW BOOK REVIEWS J.M. Bennett, Sir Alfred Stephen: Third Chief Justice of New South Wales 1844-1873 (Lives of the Australian Chief Justices series) The Federation Press, 2009, ISBN 978 186287 754 2 (Hbk) In his opening acknowledgements, the author of this new biography, Dr. John Bennett AM, puts his finger on one of the problems that haunts legal history. „It is too legal for historians and too historical for lawyers‟. This feature may help to explain the decline in the teaching of legal history at Australian law schools1. If there are occasional glimmers of light, as in this book and in the recent publication of the Kercher Reports (Federation Press, Sydney, 2009), edited by Bruce Kercher and Brent Salter for the Francis Forbes Society of Australian Legal History, it is no small thanks to the efforts of Dr. Bennett and a small team of dedicated Australian lawyers, one of whom is the editor of this Journal. This is the thirteenth volume in Dr. Bennett‟s Lives of the Australian Chief Justices. The many references throughout this volume to Sir Samuel Way, Chief Justice of South Australia, at the time when Sir Alfred Stephen served as the third chief justice of New South Wales, suggests that there are interesting volumes still to come. All believers amongst us must pray for Dr. Bennett‟s long life.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Finalists
    2017 FINALISTS Event partner Award sponsors Official publication Organised by 2 www.australasianlawyer.com.au EVENT PARTNER THURSDAY 18 MAY 2017 THE STAR SYDNEY A record number of nominations have been received from across the legal profession. Now Australasian Lawyer reveals the best of the best THE ANNUAL Australasian Law Awards celebrates stars of the profession aged 30 or under; and Australian excellence in the legal profession, recognising leading Arbitrator of the Year and Australian Mediator of the Year, lawyers, firms, in-house legal teams and the landmark extending recognition to members of the legal profession deals that have shaped the business landscape. This year, outside of firms and in-house legal teams. A new category on 18 May, The Star Sydney will once again play host to a for NZ Deal Firm of the Year has also been introduced, night of celebration. recognising the best firm across the Tasman in terms of Our call for nominations in January-February this year overall firm involvement in major deals. generated a record response with hundreds of entries Australasian Lawyer is proud to present the individuals, received across all categories. Simply being selected as a firms, teams and dealmakers that have made this year’s finalist is an achievement worthy of note. list of finalists. We would like to thank all those who As the legal profession evolves, so too does the submitted nominations this year and to all our sponsors Australasian Law Awards. Several new awards have been whose continued support makes the event a success. added: Young In-house Lawyer of the Year and Young We look forward to celebrating your success at Private Practice Lawyer of the Year recognising the rising The Star Sydney on Thursday 18 May.
    [Show full text]
  • The Actions of Members of the New South Wales Legal Profession on Gallipoli Tony Cunneen, Beecroft
    Engaged to act on another Front: the actions of members of the New South Wales legal profession on Gallipoli Tony Cunneen, Beecroft Introduction Legal history is not simply the accumulation of cases, decisions and statutes. Around this framework swirl the private lives of the solicitors, barristers, judges, clerks and associated professionals who worked in the law. A profession gains part of its character from the private lives and experiences of its early members. Through its professional ancestors the New South Wales legal fraternity is connected to a range of institutions – everything from sporting groups, schools, universities and churches. One significant group has been the military. A practical demonstration of the law‟s connection to the military was the role its members played in the Great War of 1914 to 1918. The Great War haunts the chambers, corridors, conference rooms and lecture halls that house the lawyers of today. Such places hold memories of the many members of the legal profession who gave up the law to become soldiers. Some became senior officers. Others joined and served as private soldiers, despite in some cases, their advanced age and professional status. Many were killed. Outbreak of the War The legal profession joined in the general enthusiasm at the outbreak of the First World War. The Hon. Vernon Treatt MLA, then a law student at Sydney University, recalled „the excitement which prevailed in both class and common rooms and the efforts of even the youngest students to enlist.‟ He stated that the Law School removed one „embarrassing obstacle‟ by moving exams forward to facilitate enlistment.
    [Show full text]