May 29, 2020 Mr. Thomas Maistros, Jr., RA Project Manager/UD

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

May 29, 2020 Mr. Thomas Maistros, Jr., RA Project Manager/UD May 29, 2020 Mr. Thomas Maistros, Jr., RA Project Manager/UD Consultant Stull and Lee, Inc. 103 Terrace Street Boston, MA 02120 Mr. Gregory Lickwola Construction Manager Norwalk Housing Authority 241/2 Monroe Street South Norwalk, CT 06854 RE: Traffic Study Proposed Addition to Colonial Village Norwalk, Connecticut MMI #7165-01-01 Dear Messrs. Maistros and Lickwola: At your request, we have undertaken this study to evaluate the traffic implications associated with the proposed residential development expansion of the Colonial Village in Norwalk, Connecticut. Proposed are approximately 69 new apartments within several multi-family residential buildings to be located on a piece of the property north of West Cedar Street that is undeveloped aside from a small parking lot that has access at West Cedar Street just east of and opposite Price Avenue. Also proposed as part of this modest residential expansion is a small community center building for residents of Colonial Village. Primary site access for this 69-unit residential development is to be at West Cedar Street via the existing driveway, with a secondary rear driveway to connect to a separate existing parking lot that is located just east of the apex of the curvilinear Suncrest Road. The work comprising the study consisted of a number of tasks including field reconnaissance, data collection, review of roadway and traffic conditions, estimation of site-development-generated traffic volumes, and assessment of future traffic operations at and near this new 69-apartment development. Figure 1 shows the site location map. EXISTING CONDITIONS The key intersections surrounding the site that have been analyzed as part of this study are: 1. West Cedar Street at the existing parking lot/future main site driveway 2. West Cedar Street at Scribner Avenue/shopping plaza driveway 3. West Cedar Street at North Taylor Avenue (northerly junction) West Cedar Street runs approximately east/west with one travel lane in each direction. The posted speed limit is 25 miles per hour (mph). There are sidewalks along the north side of West Cedar Street and portions of West Cedar Street have on-street parking adjacent to the westbound travel lane. 195 Church Street, 7th Floor, New Haven, CT 06510 | 203.271.1773 | www.MMInc.com CT | MA | ME | NH | NY | VT Messrs. Maistros and Lickwola | Page 2 May 29, 2020 Scribner Avenue runs approximately northwest/southeast with one travel lane in each direction and the posted speed limit is 25 mph. At the four-way intersection of Scribner Avenue at West Cedar Street and the shopping plaza driveway, all approaches are stop-sign controlled. North Taylor Avenue runs approximately north/south with one travel lane in each direction; the posted speed limit is 30 mph. The north junction intersection with West Cedar Street is a t-intersection where all movements are stop-sign controlled. South of the site, Scribner Avenue and North Taylor Avenue connect with U.S. Route 1 (Connecticut Avenue). Land use in this area of Norwalk is primarily residential and commercial. Crash Data Summary Data on traffic crashes near the site for the recent 3-year period of April 1, 2017, through March 31, 2020, was obtained via the Connecticut Crash Data Repository. This crash data repository is jointly run by the University of Connecticut and the Connecticut Department of Transportation (CTDOT) and includes crash data from municipal police departments. This data is summarized in Table 1 by location, crash severity, and collision type. TABLE 1 Crash Data Summary CRASH SEVERITY TYPE OF COLLISION REAR ON - END - - OBJECT - TO - TOTAL TOTAL ANGLE BACKING HEAD REAR DIRECTION DIRECTION FIXED REAR SERIOUS INJURY SERIOUS POSSIBLE INJURY POSSIBLE SIDESWIPE, SAME SIDESWIPE, OPPOSITE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY DAMAGE PROPERTY West Cedar Street: INJURY MINOR SUSPECTED At Scribner Avenue 5 5 4 1 5 At Suncrest Road 1 1 3 5 1 3 1 5 Between Suncrest Road 1 1 1 1 and Price Avenue At Price Avenue 1 1 1 1 Between Price Avenue 7 7 2 1 3 1 7 and Technology Plaza Between Cedar Crest 2 2 1 1 2 Place and Ivy Place At Ivy Place 3 3 1 1 1 3 At North Taylor Avenue 2 2 1 1 2 Between North Taylor 1 1 2 1 1 2 Avenue and Taylor Ave At Taylor Avenue 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 0 1 2 26 29 10 1 1 2 1 9 1 4 29 Source: Connecticut Crash Data Repository from April 1, 2017, to March 31, 2020. Messrs. Maistros and Lickwola | Page 3 May 29, 2020 A total of 29 crashes were reported for this segment of West Cedar Street during this period. Approximately 90% of reported crashes resulted in property damage only. The most common collision type was the angle collision, comprising 34% of reported crashes, followed by rear-end collisions at 31%. At the off-site intersections, there do not appear to be any unusual trends in crash history. The segment of West Cedar Street between Price Avenue and Technology Plaza, in the vicinity of the site driveway, experienced the highest number of crashes. Upon review of the roadway conditions, it is importantly noted that there is a small shopping plaza situated on the south side of West Cedar Street with head-in parking spaces that are directly in front of the storefronts, where drivers can pull directly into any of the ten or so spaces from West Cedar Street. Four of the seven crashes that occurred on this segment appear to have involved vehicles entering or exiting this parking lot colliding with westbound traffic on West Cedar Street. This apparent collision pattern appears to be an issue with the shopping plaza parking lot configuration, not with the roadway network or the Colonial Village; none of the collisions appear to have involved vehicles turning into or out of this Colonial Village driveway at West Cedar Street. Existing/Baseline Traffic Volumes Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and its overall effect on reducing current travel and traffic patterns, new intersection turning movement traffic counts were unable to be conducted at the study intersections. Instead, baseline intersection peak-hour counts were assembled from recent past data sources that were available. Subsequent to correspondence and agreement with the City of Norwalk Transportation, Mobility and Parking (TMP) Department, pre-COVID-19-pandemic count data for the off-site study intersections was assembled from StreetLight Data – a big-data company that assembles mobility information through smart-device/smartphone geographic movement data. Next, to further calibrate the peak-hour intersection count data gained from StreetLight Data, the counts were compared to the latest available (2017) bi-directional hourly traffic monitoring data in the area from CTDOT. The StreetLight Data intersection volumes where proportionally adjusted as necessary to match the recent CTDOT traffic monitoring data for the weekday morning and afternoon peak hours of 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. respectively. Figure 2 shows the existing/baseline intersection peak-hour traffic volumes that are used in this study. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The site of the proposed 69-apartment development is approximately 7.6 acres of largely undeveloped land that is part of the larger 25.7-acre Colonial Village site. The existing Colonial Village contains approximately 200 units, which were built in 1952. Currently, the site of the proposed 69 new apartments is vacant aside from a basketball court in the north portion of the parcel and the aforementioned small existing parking lot in the south portion of the parcel with access via West Cedar Street. This current lot of around 25 parking spaces provides parking for a handful of existing residential units; as part of this development, these spaces are to be relocated nearby within what will be the expanded Colonial Village. Once complete, the proposed development will consist of 18 buildings with 69 total residential units and associated increased site parking. Additionally, there will be the approximately 4,500-square-foot community center for the Colonial Village residents. As mentioned above, the primary access for the new 69 apartments will be via what will be a refurbished driveway at the location of the existing West Cedar Street driveway. As part of this development, on-street parking on West Cedar Street should be prohibited within 40 feet on either side of the site driveway for visibility. Messrs. Maistros and Lickwola | Page 4 May 29, 2020 Sightlines were reviewed for a driver egressing the site driveway at West Cedar Street. Looking right, the driver's line of sight extends over 300 feet along West Cedar Street, meeting the CTDOT guideline of 280 feet for the posted speed limit of 25 mph. Looking left, the line of sight extends to the stop-controlled intersection of West Cedar Street at Technology Plaza, approximately 280 feet, also meeting the CTDOT guideline. It is noted that existing roadway traffic conditions, namely the horizontal curvature in West Cedar Street (west of the site) and the all-way stop control at Technology Plaza (east of the site), limit vehicle travel speeds for eastbound and westbound approaching vehicles, respectively. Therefore, the available sight distances are expected to remain adequate. SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC Site-generated peak-hour vehicle trips from the proposed 69-unit residential development were estimated using statistical data published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE).1 ITE Land Use Code (LUC) #220, multi-family housing (low-rise) was used to estimate the site-generated traffic for the proposed development during the study peak hours; these traffic estimates can be seen in Table 2. TABLE 2 Site Development Traffic Estimates NUMBER OF VEHICLE TRIPS ITE WEEKDAY MORNING WEEKDAY AFTERNOON LAND USE LAND PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR USE # IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL Multi-family Housing (Low-Rise), 69 units 220 7 25 32 25 15 40 Source: Trip Generation, 10th Edition.
Recommended publications
  • Baseandmodifiedcuneiformsigns.Pdf
    12000 CUNEIFORM SIGN A 12001 CUNEIFORM SIGN A TIMES A 12002 CUNEIFORM SIGN A TIMES BAD 12003 CUNEIFORM SIGN A TIMES GAN2 TENU 12004 CUNEIFORM SIGN A TIMES HA 12005 CUNEIFORM SIGN A TIMES IGI 12006 CUNEIFORM SIGN A TIMES LAGAR GUNU 12007 CUNEIFORM SIGN A TIMES MUSH 12008 CUNEIFORM SIGN A TIMES SAG 12009 CUNEIFORM SIGN A2 1200A CUNEIFORM SIGN AB 1200B CUNEIFORM SIGN AB GUNU 1200C CUNEIFORM SIGN AB TIMES ASH2 1200D CUNEIFORM SIGN AB TIMES GIN2 1200E CUNEIFORM SIGN AB TIMES GAL 1200F CUNEIFORM SIGN AB TIMES GAN2 TENU 12010 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB TIMES HA 12011 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB TIMES IMIN 12012 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB TIMES LAGAB 12013 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB TIMES SHESH 12014 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB TIMES SIG7 12015 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB TIMES U PLUS U PLUS U 12016 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 12017 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES ASHGAB 12018 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES BALAG 12019 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES BI 1201A CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES DUG 1201B CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES GAN2 TENU 1201C CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES GUD 1201D CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES KAD3 1201E CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES LA 1201F CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES ME PLUS EN 12020 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES NE 12021 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES SHA3 12022 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES SIG7 12023 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES SILA3 12024 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES TAK4 12025 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES U2 12026 CUNEIFORM SIGN AD 12027 CUNEIFORM SIGN AK 12028 CUNEIFORM SIGN AK TIMES ERIN2 12029 CUNEIFORM SIGN AK TIMES SAL PLUS GISH 1202A CUNEIFORM SIGN AK TIMES SHITA PLUS GISH 1202B CUNEIFORM SIGN AL 1202C CUNEIFORM SIGN
    [Show full text]
  • Cuneiform Sign List ⊭ ⅗⋼⊑∾ ⊭‸↪≿
    CUNEIFORM SIGN LIST ⊭ ⅗⋼⊑∾ ⊭‸↪≿ Kateřina Šašková Pilsen 2021 CONTENTS Cuneiform Sign List...........................................................................................................................3 References and Sources.................................................................................................................511 Abbreviations.................................................................................................................................513 2 CUNEIFORM SIGN LIST AŠ 001 001 U+12038 (ASH) (1, ANA , AS , AṢ , AŠ ‸ 3 3 3 ‸ (MesZL: see also U.DAR (nos. 670+183)), AŠA, AŠŠA, AZ3, DAL3, DEL, DELE, DEŠ2, DIL, DILI, DIŠ2, EŠ20, GE15, GEŠ4 (MesZL: perhaps to be erased, Deimel GEŠ), GUBRU2 (Labat; MesZL: GUBRU2 read LIRU2), ḪIL2 (Labat; MesZL: ḪIL2 missing), IN6 (MesZL: Labat IN3; Labat: IN6), INA, LIRI2 (MesZL: Labat GUBRU2), LIRU2 (MesZL: Labat GUBRU2), LIRUM2 (MesZL: Labat GUBRU2), MAKAŠ2, MAKKAŠ2, RAM2 (MesZL: ?), RIM5, RU3, RUM, SAGTAG, SAGTAK, SALUGUB, SANTA, SANTAG, SANTAK, SIMED (Labat: in index, in syllabary missing; 3 MesZL: SIMED missing), ŠUP2 (MesZL: Labat ŠUP3), ŠUP3 (Labat; MesZL: ŠUP2, ŠUP3 = ŠAB (no. 466)), TAL3, TIL4, ṬIL, UBU (Labat: in index, in syllabary missing; MesZL: UBU = GE23 (no. 575)), UTAK (Labat: in index, in syllabary missing; MesZL: UTAK = GE22 (no. 647))) (ePSD; Akkadian Dictionary) AŠ.DAR (MesZL: also AŠ.TAR2, old form of U.DAR (no. U+12038 & 670), see also U+1206F 001+183 001+114 (ASH & GE23.DAR (no. 575) ‸ ‸ DAR) and DIŠ.DAR (no. 748)) (ePSD; Akkadian Dictionary)
    [Show full text]
  • Loose Threads of Tradition: Two Late Hemerological Compilations
    LOOSE THREADS OF TRADITION: TWO LATE HEMEROLOGICAL COMPILATIONS Enrique Jiménez (Yale University) Abstract Hemerologies were among the most widespread texts in ancient Mesopotamia. Known already in the Old Babylonian period, they were copied until the end of cuneiform culture, but the manuscripts often elaborate on their originals to create new, heterogeneous compositions. This paper suggests dividing hemerologies into two broad categories, accor- ding to the way they were transmitted: the first group consists of standardized texts, such as series and short manuals, which were transmitted in a more or less fixed format. The second category contains treatises composed ad hoc by combining various pieces of hemerological lore. These treatises, which are here called “hemerological compilations,” were usually short-lived and are typically preserved in only one manuscript. It will be shown that several of the most important hemerological texts known today are best described as “hemerological compilations.” In addition, two almost completely preserved tablets from Babylon are edited here for the first time. Dating to Achaemenid and Seleucid times, they represent the latest known examples of such “hemerological compilations.” Introduction One of the most resilient Assyriological beliefs is that the “stream of tradition,” the corpus of texts copied from generation to generation throughout the first millennium BCE, had its origins in the late second millennium BCE.1 According to this opinion, it was at that time that the literary traditions of Babylonia were standardized and given the serialized forms that they retained until the end of cuneiform culture. This notion, which was first enunciated by von Soden in 1953, is underpinned by two main pieces of evidence, cited by all scholars studying the process of formation of the Babylonian “canon.” These are two scribal notes appended to first-millennium tablets that describe the process of “canonization” and connect it with scholars who lived in the second half of the second millennium BCE.
    [Show full text]
  • The Epic of Gilgamesh
    Semantikon.com presents An Old Babylonian Version of the Gilgamesh Epic On the Basis of Recently Discovered Texts By Morris Jastrow Jr., Ph.D., LL.D. Professor of Semitic Languages, University of Pennsylvania And Albert T. Clay, Ph.D., LL.D., Litt.D. Professor of Assyriology and Babylonian Literature, Yale University In Memory of William Max Müller (1863-1919) Whose life was devoted to Egyptological research which he greatly enriched by many contributions PREFATORY NOTE The Introduction, the Commentary to the two tablets, and the Appendix, are by Professor Jastrow, and for these he assumes the sole responsibility. The text of the Yale tablet is by Professor Clay. The transliteration and the translation of the two tablets represent the joint work of the two authors. In the transliteration of the two tablets, C. E. Keiser's "System of Accentuation for Sumero-Akkadian signs" (Yale Oriental Researches--VOL. IX, Appendix, New Haven, 1919) has been followed. INTRODUCTION. I. The Gilgamesh Epic is the most notable literary product of Babylonia as yet discovered in the mounds of Mesopotamia. It recounts the exploits and adventures of a favorite hero, and in its final form covers twelve tablets, each tablet consisting of six columns (three on the obverse and three on the reverse) of about 50 lines for each column, or a total of about 3600 lines. Of this total, however, barely more than one-half has been found among the remains of the great collection of cuneiform tablets gathered by King Ashurbanapal (668-626 B.C.) in his palace at Nineveh, and discovered by Layard in 1854 [1] in the course of his excavations of the mound Kouyunjik (opposite Mosul).
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation of a Goddess by David Sugimoto
    Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 263 David T. Sugimoto (ed.) Transformation of a Goddess Ishtar – Astarte – Aphrodite Academic Press Fribourg Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht Göttingen Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Bibliothek Die Deutsche Bibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. Publiziert mit freundlicher Unterstützung der PublicationSchweizerischen subsidized Akademie by theder SwissGeistes- Academy und Sozialwissenschaften of Humanities and Social Sciences InternetGesamtkatalog general aufcatalogue: Internet: Academic Press Fribourg: www.paulusedition.ch Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen: www.v-r.de Camera-readyText und Abbildungen text prepared wurden by vomMarcia Autor Bodenmann (University of Zurich). als formatierte PDF-Daten zur Verfügung gestellt. © 2014 by Academic Press Fribourg, Fribourg Switzerland © Vandenhoeck2014 by Academic & Ruprecht Press Fribourg Göttingen Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht Göttingen ISBN: 978-3-7278-1748-9 (Academic Press Fribourg) ISBN:ISBN: 978-3-525-54388-7978-3-7278-1749-6 (Vandenhoeck(Academic Press & Ruprecht)Fribourg) ISSN:ISBN: 1015-1850978-3-525-54389-4 (Orb. biblicus (Vandenhoeck orient.) & Ruprecht) ISSN: 1015-1850 (Orb. biblicus orient.) Contents David T. Sugimoto Preface .................................................................................................... VII List of Contributors ................................................................................ X
    [Show full text]
  • M/W\ Fl, Ud SIGNATURE of CITY CLERK Or PRINT NAME TITLE OFFICIAL AUTHORIZEDTO ADMINISTER LOYALTY OATH
    CITY OF LOS ANGELES PUBLIC EMPLOYEE /-->u--/ DISASTER SERVICE WORKER PROGRAM M C- Government Code §3100 It is hereby declared that the protection of the health and safety and preservation of the lives and property of the people of the state from the effects of natural, manmade, or war-caused emergencies which result in conditions of disaster or in extreme peril to life, property, and resources is of paramount state importance requiring the responsible efforts of public and private agencies and individual citizens. In furtherance of the exercise of the police power of the state in protection of its citizens and resources, all public employees are hereby declared to be disaster service workers subject to such disaster service activities as may be assigned to them by their superiors or by law. Government Code §3108-3109 Every person who, while taking and subscribing to the oath or affirmation required by this chapter, states as true any material matter which he or she knows to be false, is guilty of perjury, and is punishable by imprisonment-in the state prison for two, three, or four years. Every person having taken and subscribed to the oath or affirmation required by this chapter, who, while in the employ of, or service with, the state or any county, city, city and county, state agency, public district, or disaster council or emergency organization advocates or becomes a member of any party or organization, political or otherwise, that advocates the overthrow of the government of the United States by force or violence or other unlawful means, is guilty of a felony, and is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison.
    [Show full text]
  • ASTARTE Vel Liber BERYLLI Sub Figura CLXXV
    ASTARTE vel Liber BERYLLI sub figura CLXXV $Â$Â 3XEOLFDWLRQLQ&ODVV% ,PSULPDWXU 1)UD$Â$Â 0. This is the Book of Uniting Himself to a particular Deity by devotion. 1. &RQVLGHUDWLRQVEHIRUHWKH7KUHVKROGFirst concerning the choice of a particular Deity. This matter is of no import, sobeit that thou choose one suited to thine own highest nature. Howsoever, this method is not so suitable for gods austere as Saturn, or intellectual as Thoth. But for such deities as in themselves partake in anywise of love it is a perfect mode. 2. &RQFHUQLQJWKHSULPHPHWKRGRIWKLV0DJLFN$UWLet the devotee consider well that although Christ and Osiris be one, yet the former is to be worshipped with Christian, and the latter with Egyptian rites. And this although the rites themselves are ceremonially equivalent. There should, however, be RQHsymbol declaring the transcending of such limitations; and with regard to the Deity also, there should be some RQHaffirmation of his identity both with all other similar gods of other nations, and with the Supreme of whom all are but partial reflections. 3. &RQFHUQLQJWKHFKLHISODFHRIGHYRWLRQ This is the Heart of the Devotee, and should be symbolically represented by that room or spot which he loves best. And the dearest spot therein shall be the shrine of his temple. It is most convenient if this shrine and altar should be sequestered in woods, or in a private grove, or garden. But let it be protected from the profane. 4. &RQFHUQLQJWKH,PDJHRIWKH'HLW\ Let there be an image of the Deity; first because in meditation there is mindfulness induced thereby; and second because a certain power enters and inhabits it by virtue of the ceremonies; or so it is said, and We deny it not.
    [Show full text]
  • Qur'anic Narrative and Sufi Hermeneutics: Rumi's Interpretations of Pharaoh's Character
    SSStttooonnnyyy BBBrrrooooookkk UUUnnniiivvveeerrrsssiiitttyyy The official electronic file of this thesis or dissertation is maintained by the University Libraries on behalf of The Graduate School at Stony Brook University. ©©© AAAllllll RRRiiiggghhhtttsss RRReeessseeerrrvvveeeddd bbbyyy AAAuuuttthhhooorrr... Qur’anic Narrative and Sufi Hermeneutics: R¯um¯ı’s Interpretations of Pharaoh’s Character A Dissertation Presented by Amer Latif to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English (Comparative Literature) Stony Brook University May 2009 Copyright by Amer Latif 2009 Stony Brook University The Graduate School Amer Latif We, the dissertation committee for the above candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this dissertation. William Chittick Professor, Comparative Literary and Cultural Studies and Asian and Asian American Studies Sachiko Murata Professor, Comparative Literary and Cultural Studies and Asian and Asian American Studies Peter Manchester Associate Professor, Philosophy Robert Goldenberg Professor, History This dissertation is accepted by the Graduate School Lawrence Martin Dean of the Graduate School ii Abstract of the Dissertation Qur’anic Narrative and Sufi Hermeneutics: R¯um¯ı’s Interpretations of Pharaoh’s Character by Amer Latif Doctor of Philosophy in English (Comparative Literature) Stony Brook University 2009 This dissertation examines Jal¯alal-D¯ınR¯um¯ı’s(d. 1273) hermeneutics of the Qur’an by focusing on his interpretations of the Qur’anic character of Pharaoh. Although R¯um¯ıdid not write a commentary in the traditional genre of tafs¯ır by commenting on the Qur’an in a linear verse by verse fashion, significant portions of his poetry are explicitly devoted to Qur’anic interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gilgameš Epic at Ugarit
    The Gilgameš epic at Ugarit Andrew R. George − London [Fourteen years ago came the announcement that several twelfth-century pieces of the Babylonian poem of Gilgameš had been excavated at Ugarit, now Ras Shamra on the Mediterranean coast. This article is written in response to their editio princeps as texts nos. 42–5 in M. Daniel Arnaud’s brand-new collection of Babylonian library tablets from Ugarit (Arnaud 2007). It takes a second look at the Ugarit fragments, and considers especially their relationship to the other Gilgameš material.] The history of the Babylonian Gilgameš epic falls into two halves that roughly correspond to the second and first millennia BC respectively. 1 In the first millennium we find multiple witnesses to its text that come exclusively from Babylonia and Assyria. They allow the reconstruction of a poem in which the sequence of lines, passages and episodes is more or less fixed and the text more or less stable, and present essentially the same, standardized version of the poem. With the exception of a few Assyrian tablets that are relics of an older version (or versions), all first-millennium tablets can be fitted into this Standard Babylonian poem, known in antiquity as ša naqba īmuru “He who saw the Deep”. The second millennium presents a very different picture. For one thing, pieces come from Syria, Palestine and Anatolia as well as Babylonia and Assyria. These fragments show that many different versions of the poem were extant at one time or another during the Old and Middle Babylonian periods. In addition, Hittite and Hurrian paraphrases existed alongside the Akkadian texts.
    [Show full text]
  • Canaano-Akkadian Some Methodological Requisites for the Study of the Amarna Letters from Canaan
    Canaano-Akkadian Some Methodological Requisites for the Study of the Amarna Letters from Canaan Shlomo Izre’el 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The Amarna letters and their language The Amarna letters are named after the site in Egypt in which they were discovered. These letters were sent to the Egyptian pharaohs Amenophis III and his son Akhenaten around the middle of the 14th century B.C. Among the senders were the kings of Babylonia, Assyria, Hatti and Mittanni, as well as minor rulers of the Near East at that time. The letters were written in the cuneiform script, most of them in Akkadian or what was thought to be Akkadian by the scribes who wrote them (I will elaborate on this issue later). During the second millenium B.C., Akkadian, or what is now termed Peripheral Akkadian, served as the lingua franca, i.e., the diplomatic language, of the Ancient Near East. Many of the letters were sent to the Egyptian pharaohs by the rulers of Canaanite city-states, which were at that time under the sovereignty of Egypt. When we examine the letters in terms of their linguistic structure, we realize that most of them were not written in the common Peripheral Akkadian dialect, but rather in a mixed language: Akkadian almost entirely predominated in its lexical inventory, while Canaanite, the mother-tongue of the scribes who wrote these letters, predominated in the domain of grammar. The latter influenced the syntax and the morphology of this mixed language, and affected its phonology and semantics. Here and there a purely Canaanite word appears, written in the cuneiform syllabary, to translate a particularly difficult Akkadian word or a (Sumerian) logogram.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Seeks Nation·Al Help to Save State Carnival Combines UD, City
    Today's A four-star weather: AU-American Partly cloudy and newspaper mild. Highs in the mid-to-upper 60s. Vol. 115 No. 30 Student Center, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716 Tuesday, May 9, 1989 GroUp seeks Hogan nation·al help recalls to save State year of by John Robinson rounding property, declined to Staff Reporter comment on the possibility of change preserving the building. "Citizens for a Newark "I think the State is coming Community" is exploring ways down," he said. by Karen Wolf to preserve the State Theatre Teeven's plans for the prop­ and Darin Powell and to continue its use in the erty include constructing a four­ City News Editors future as a community center, story office building on the site. group member Peter Norton Norton said he has tried If there is one concept said Saturday. repeatedly to meet with Teeven Newarlc Chief of Police William The group has been in touch and discuss possibilities for A. Hogan believes he has set with the National Main Street saving the theater. into motion during his two years Center in Washington, D.C., "We are not trying to go serving the city, it is action which is part of the National above anyone's head by going based on community needs. Trust for Historic Preservation, to Washington," he said. "We "My coming in [as police he said. tri,.ed to get City Council chief] is looking at what we The center works with city involved without success~ have now and making it better," businesses, governments and "The mission of the Main .
    [Show full text]
  • Egyptology, Egyptomania, Egyptian Modernity / Elliott Colla
    ConfliCted Antiquities Conflicted Antiquities egyptology, egyptomAniA, egyptiAn modernit y Elliott Colla Duke University Press Durham and London 2007 © 2007 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper ∞ Designed by C. H. Westmoreland Typeset in Warnock Pro by Achorn International Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data appear on the last printed page of this book. Duke University Press gratefully acknowledges the support of Brown University, which provided funds toward the production of this book. To Josephine, who sent me, and Dele, who welcomed me home. And always, to Nadia, who’d rather come along. Contents ACknowledgments . ix Introduction: The Egyptian Sculpture Room . 1 1 The Artifaction of the Memnon Head . 24 Ozymandias . 67 2 Conflicted Antiquities: Islam’s Pharaoh and Emergent Egyptology . 72 The Antiqakhana . 116 3 Pharaonic Selves . 121 Two Pharaohs . 167 4 The Discovery of Tutankhamen’s Tomb: Archaeology, Politics, Literature . 172 Nahdat Misr . 227 5 Pharaonism after Pharaonism: Mahfouz and Qutb . 234 Conclusion . 273 notes . 279 BiBliogrAphy . 311 index . 329 Acknowledgments This book did not come into being by itself, nor was it produced single- handedly. In conducting my research for the book I was fortunate to be assisted by the able team of Ghenwa Hayek and Ben Kamber in Provi- dence, Kouross Esmaeli in New York, and Reham Shams El-Dean in Cairo. Likewise invaluable was the assistance of the staffs at Dar al-Kutub, Dar al-Watha’iq, the British Library, the British Museum, and the Ministère des Affaires Étrangères. Charles Auger and Carol Wilson-Allen pro- vided continuous and patient assistance throughout.
    [Show full text]