From Lois Weber to Kathryn Bigelow, and the “Chick- Flick” Reputation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From Lois Weber to Kathryn Bigelow, and the “Chick- Flick” Reputation Where are All the Women? From Lois Weber to Kathryn Bigelow, and the “Chick- Flick” Reputation Cathy Kostova, 9 March 2015 I. Intro Manohla Dargis argues[1] that Kathryn Bigelow’s two-fisted win at the Academy Awards, in 2009, for best director and best film, for “The Hurt Locker”, has helped dismantle stereotypes about what types of films women can and should direct. As much as I agree with her that this was a historic and exhilarating moment for women filmmakers all around the world, I find the fact that the Oscar was granted to a movie with no female point of view whatsoever and to a director who tries her best not to be identified as female when it comes to her job, proves that films with strong female characters, and women directors who create such characters, remain very rarely recognized. 1. The Academy Statistics There have been only 4 women nominated for best director, out of the 424 nominations in the history of the Oscars: 1976: Lina Wertmüller for “Seven Beauties” (1975), 1993: Jane Campion for “The Piano” (1993), 2003: Sofia Coppola for “Lost in Translation” (2003), and 2009: Kathryn Bigelow for “The Hurt Locker” (2008) A 2012 survey conducted by the Los Angeles Times found that overall, academy members are 94 percent white and 77 percent male, and that their median age is 62. Cathy Kostova 1 WHERE ARE ALL THE WOMEN? From Lois Weber To Kathryn Bigelow, and the “Chick-Flick” Reputation, 9 March 2015 Women make up 19 percent of the academy’s screenwriting branch and 18 percent of its producers branch, but only 9 percent of its directors branch. To the question whether those statistics mirror those of the industry, the Academy says, because it’s an honor society it only recognizes people who are getting jobs in Hollywood. And people who are getting jobs in Hollywood are older white men[2]. 2. The Chick-Flick Stigma Films about women of all genres are continuously dismissed as “chick-flics”, a pejorative term for a film genre mainly dealing with heavy emotions and romance and designed to appeal to a largely female target audience[3]. And chick flicks, as Dargis points out, are often the only movies that offer female audiences stories about women, female friendships and female characters who are not standing on the sidelines as the male hero saves the day[1]. My question is, why in order to survive in Hollywood, women filmmakers have to either create sugar-full rom-coms (like Nora Ephron, Nancy Meyers and unfortunately Sofia Coppola) or go to the other extreme and take femininity completely out of the picture (like Kathryn Bigelow)? Looking back in history, it seems something happened in the mid-1920s, and with the arrival of the talkies, the female voice got lost. 3. The Silent Era While Hollywood was starving for content and the audience was predominantly female, there seemed to be little gender bias in getting film jobs. Both men and women were welcome behind the camera and women were active at all levels of the industry[4]. Beginning in 1895 and continuing until 1919, Alice Guy-Blaché - the first female filmmaker in history, who was originally from France but eventually ended up in Hollywood - directed and produced nearly 300 films in all genres. She was amongst the first to make a science fiction film, titled In the Year 2000 (1912), in which women rule the world. She was the first director in movie history to make a narrative film (a fictional story put to film), The Cabbage Fairy (1896). She made one of the first movies shot in color, The Spring Fairy (1906) and around 100 sound movies, between 1906 and 1907; each movie ran one to two minutes in length using an early sound device called the “Chronophone”, which combined sound recorded on a wax cylinder with the filmed image. Mary Pickford (1894-1979) was the first actor - male or female - to become a millionaire. She also led the most successful independent production company in the early years of Hollywood, United Artists, along with Douglas Fairbanks, and Charlie Chaplain. A study done by the Writers Guild of America revealed that from the beginning of the 20th century until the mid-1920s, women outnumbered men as screenwriters by 10 to one. Cathy Kostova 2 WHERE ARE ALL THE WOMEN? From Lois Weber To Kathryn Bigelow, and the “Chick-Flick” Reputation, 9 March 2015 From that period, one of the highest-paid screenwriters and studio executives was June Mathis (1892-1927). Within seven years of starting her screenwriting career, she had become so valuable to the MGM Studio that owner Samuel Goldwyn insured her life for $1,000,000. Her talent revealed itself when she took a popular war novel, The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, and adapted it for film after every other major studio had tried and determined it was impossible to adapt. She persuaded MGM to pay $20,000 for the rights, promising she could turn it into a successful screenplay. Released in 1921, it became one of the most profitable silent movies ever made. Writer/Director Lois Weber (1879-1939) was the best-known and most prolific female filmmaker of this period, responsible for writing, directing, and sometimes acting in hundreds of shorts made between 1911 and 1916, and at least 44 feature films from 1914 through 1934, including The Merchant of Venice (1914), the first American feature directed by a woman[5]. At her peak in 1920, this remarkably talented woman was under contract by Paramount Studio for $50,000 per picture plus half of the profits[6]. Cathy Kostova 3 WHERE ARE ALL THE WOMEN? From Lois Weber To Kathryn Bigelow, and the “Chick-Flick” Reputation, 9 March 2015 II. Lois Weber (1879–1939) Director, Writer, Producer, Actress Lois Weber on the set of The Angel of Broadway (1927) with cinematographer Arthur Miller Lois Weber (center) on the set of The Angel of Lois Weber (left) with actress Billie Dove Broadway, 1927 Carl Laemmle, founder of Universal: “I would trust Miss Weber with any sum of money that she needed to make any picture that she wanted to make… She knows the motion picture business as few people do.”[6] At a time when many remained wary of cinema’s cultural impact, Weber believed in the medium’s narrative and dramatic power. Her “ideal picture entertainment,” she once said, was “a well assorted shelf of books come to life”[7]. She often talked of using motion pictures as a means of achieving political change, aspiring to produce work “that will have an influence for good on the public mind”[8][9]. Weber wrote and directed a series of high-profile films on social issues of the day, including religious hypocrisy in Hypocrites (1915), capital punishment in The People vs. John Doe (1916), drug addiction in Hop, the Devil’s Brew (1916), poverty and wage equity in Shoes (1916), and contraception in Where Are My Children? (1916) and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle (1917). Her name was routinely mentioned alongside contemporaries like Griffith and DeMille as one of the top talents in Hollywood. Cathy Kostova 4 WHERE ARE ALL THE WOMEN? From Lois Weber To Kathryn Bigelow, and the “Chick-Flick” Reputation, 9 March 2015 In 1916, she became the first and only woman elected to the Motion Picture Directors Association, a solitary honor she would retain for decades[10]. She continued to write and direct films heavily influenced by moral issues until the very end of her career, but already in the early 1920s, the American audiences were tired of these “sermons” and Weber’s continuous and explicit critique of Hollywood’s glamour didn’t serve her good either. E.g. the heroine in “Angel of Broadway” (1927) rejects stardom and artifice in favor of a more genuine engagement with life[11]. The dissolve of Lois Weber’s first marriage to Phillips Smalley in 1922 is often thrown as reason for the abrupt shift down in her career, and there have been multiple attempts to devalue her achievements by attributing them to her ex-husband. However such statements have been countered by multiple historians by taking a look at Smalley’s career after the divorce, which shows no behind the camera action from his part while Weber continued directing until 1934. Starting from the early 1920s, Weber’s focus on urban social problems, rather than entertainment, and on the complexities of marriage, rather than romantic comedies, was increasingly perceived as outdated, overly didactic, and dower. America’s rising attraction to escapism is a more likely reason for the demise of Weber’s directing career. “Why does Miss Weber dedicate herself, her time and her equipment to the construction of simple sermons?”[8][12] 1. Bio Born: Florence Lois Weber June 13, 1879 in Allegheny, Pennsylvania, USA (since 1907 Pittsburgh's Northside neighborhood) Died: November 13, 1939 (age 60) in Hollywood, California, USA[13][14] Lois was the second daughter of George and Mary Matilda Weber. George Weber was an upholsterer and decorator, who headed a deeply religious family. The Weber name was prominent in the religious development of Western PA. The first church in Pittsburg, The German Evangelical Church was organized by Reverend Johann Wilheim Weber in 1782. Despite being the son of a preacher, George Weber did not match the stereotype of a Victorian father imbued with religious fanaticism. His hobby was to write stories for his two daughters and anxious that they might appreciate as much as he the beauty of a landscape or sunset, he would often take them out to the country.
Recommended publications
  • Woody Allen: O Teatro Em Seus Filmes, O Cinema Em Suas Peças
    0 Myriam Pessoa Nogueira Woody Allen: O teatro em seus filmes, O cinema em suas peças. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Escola de Belas Artes Agosto de 2014 1 Myriam Pessoa Nogueira Woody Allen: O teatro em seus filmes, O cinema em suas peças. Tese de doutoramento no Programa de Pós- Graduação em Artes da Escola de Belas Artes da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, como requisito parcial à obtenção do título de Doutora em Artes. Área de Concentração: Arte e Tecnologia da Imagem (Cinema) Orientador: Prof. Dr. Luiz Nazario Belo Horizonte Escola de Belas Artes/UFMG 2014 2 Dedico a minha mãe, Stela Matutina Pessoa Reis, que projetava filmes na parede de uma igreja de uma cidade pequena do interior de Minas, como em Cinema Paradiso. 3 AGRADECIMENTOS Ao meu orientador, Dr. Luiz Roberto Nazario, por ter me aceito neste programa de pós-graduação, sua paciência e disponibilidade. À minha mãe, que teve de aguentar uma doutoranda pedindo silêncio para escrever, discutindo com o computador que pifava, com a impressora que não funcionava...e revendo comigo todos os filmes de Woody Allen e de outros diretores. À Capes, pela bolsa no Brasil e no exterior (PDSE). A todos os professores da EBA e da UFMG que me acompanharam até aqui. À Sra. Zina Pawlowski de Souza, sempre prestativa, disponível e paciente com os orientandos e alunos em geral. A meu tutor na Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, Estados Unidos, Dr. Steven Shaviro, e todo o pessoal de lá, e a Bill Winkler e sua família, pela hospedagem. À Universidade de Princeton, ao Paley Media Center, à Library of Congress, pela porta aberta à pesquisa.
    [Show full text]
  • Bigelow Masculinity
    Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network, Vol. 4, No. 1 (2011) Article TOUGH GUY IN DRAG? HOW THE EXTERNAL, CRITICAL DISCOURSES SURROUNDING KATHRYN BIGELOW DEMONSTRATE THE WIDER PROBLEMS OF THE GENDER QUESTION. RONA MURRAY, De Montford University ABSTRACT This article argues that the various approaches adopted towards Kathryn Bigelow’s work, and their tendency to focus on a gendered discourse, obscures the wider political discourses these texts contain. In particular, by analysing the representation of masculinity across the films, it is possible to see how the work of this director and her collaborators is equally representative of its cultural context and how it uses the trope of the male body as a site for a dialectical study of the uses and status of male strength within an imperialistically-minded western society. KEYWORDS Counter-cultural, feminism, feminist, gender, masculinity, western. ISSN 1755-9944 1 Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network, Vol. 4, No. 1 (2011) Whether the director Kathryn Bigelow likes it or not, gender has been made to lie at the heart of her work, not simply as it figures in her texts but also as it is used to initiate discussion about her own function/place as an auteur? Her career illustrates how the personal becomes the political not via individual agency but in the way she has come to stand as a particular cultural symbol – as a woman directing men in male-orientated action genres. As this persona has become increasingly loaded with various significances, it has begun to alter the interpretations of her films.
    [Show full text]
  • PIONEERS: FIRST WOMEN FILMMAKERS Distribuidora: Kino Lorber Zona
    PIONEERS: FIRST WOMEN Idle Wives (Lois Weber, 1916, 23:5’) FILMMAKERS * Too Wise Wives (Lois Weber, 1921, 69:5’) Distribuidora: Kino Lorber What Do Men Want? (Lois Weber, 1921, 40:75’) Zona: Región 1 Lois Weber documentary, 12’ Contenido: seis discos en DVD (con contenidos adicionales en Blu-ray*) más un libreto ilustrado DVD 3 / Pioneers of Genre de 76 páginas * Hazards of Helen, Ep. 09: «Leap From the Wa- ter Tower» (Helen Holmes, 1915, 11’) DVD 1 / Alice Guy-Blaché Hazards of Helen, Ep.13: «The Escape on the Mixed Pets (Alice Guy-Blaché, 1911, 14:1’) Fast Freight» (Helen Holmes, 1915, 11:25’) Tramp Strategy (Alice Guy-Blaché, 1911, 12’) Hazards of Helen, Ep. 26: «The Wild Engine» (Helen Holmes, 1915, 10:5’) Greater Love Hath No Man (Alice Guy-Blaché, 1911, 16:25’) * The Purple Mask, Ep. 5: «Part 1» (Grace Cu- nard, 1917, 13’) Algie the Miner (Alice Guy-Blaché, 1912, 10’) The Purple Mask, Ep. 12: «Vault of Mystery» Falling Leaves (Alice Guy-Blaché, 1912, 11:75’) (Grace Cunard, 1917, 19:5’) The Little Rangers (Alice Guy-Blaché, 1912, 11:5’) The Purple Mask, Ep. 13: « The Leap» (Grace Canned Harmony (Alice Guy-Blaché, 1912, 16’) Cunard, 1917, 10:5’) A Fool and His Money (Alice Guy-Blaché, 1912, A Daughter of “The Law” (Grace Cunard, 1921, 10:75’) 21:75’) The High Cost of Living (Alice Guy-Blaché, 1912, Eleanor’s Catch (Cleo Madison, 1916, 13:25’) 14:5’) ‘49 - ‘17 (Ruth Ann Baldwin, 1917, 70:25’) * The Coming of Sunbeam (Alice Guy-Blaché, Caught in a Cabaret (Mabel Normand, 1914, 1913, 11:25’) 23:5’) * Burstup Homes’ Murder Case (Alice
    [Show full text]
  • Female Director Takes Hollywood by Storm: Is She a Beauty Or a Visionary?
    Western Oregon University Digital Commons@WOU Honors Senior Theses/Projects Student Scholarship 6-1-2016 Female Director Takes Hollywood by Storm: Is She a Beauty or a Visionary? Courtney Richardson Western Oregon University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/honors_theses Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons Recommended Citation Richardson, Courtney, "Female Director Takes Hollywood by Storm: Is She a Beauty or a Visionary?" (2016). Honors Senior Theses/Projects. 107. https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/honors_theses/107 This Undergraduate Honors Thesis/Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Digital Commons@WOU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Senior Theses/Projects by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@WOU. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Female Director Takes Hollywood by Storm: Is She a Beauty or a Visionary? By Courtney Richardson An Honors Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Graduation from the Western Oregon University Honors Program Dr. Shaun Huston, Thesis Advisor Dr. Gavin Keulks, Honors Program Director Western Oregon University June 2016 2 Acknowledgements First I would like to say a big thank you to my advisor Dr. Shaun Huston. He agreed to step in when my original advisor backed out suddenly and without telling me and really saved the day. Honestly, that was the most stressful part of the entire process and knowing that he was available if I needed his help was a great relief. Second, a thank you to my Honors advisor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Lois Weber Press Release FINAL
    Media Contacts: Brady Smith 412-454-6459 [email protected] Kim Roberts 412-454-6382 [email protected] History Center to Honor Early Filmmaking Pioneer Lois Weber - A special program honoring the North Side native will feature Turner Classic Movies host Illeana Douglas and film historian Shelley Stamp - PITTSBURGH, May 29, 2019 – The Smithsonian-affiliated Senator John Heinz History Center will honor early filmmaking pioneer Lois Weber with a historical marker unveiling and a special program featuring Turner Classic Movies host Illeana Douglas and film historian Shelley Stamp on Thursday, June 13. Born on Federal Street in Allegheny City (now known as Pittsburgh’s North Side) in 1879, Weber was America’s first woman film director. In an influential career that spanned a quarter of a century, she wrote, directed, produced, and performed in more than 200 films. At 2 p.m. on June 13, representatives from the Heinz History Center, the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh, and the Allegheny City Society will unveil a new state historical marker in Weber’s honor outside Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh – Allegheny (1230 Federal Street). The unveiling will be followed by a reception inside the library. This historical marker unveiling is free and open to the public. At 7 p.m. on June 13, the History Center will host a special program on film history entitled Lois Weber: Film Pioneer with actor and Turner Classic Movies host Illeana Douglas and Dr. Shelley Stamp, film historian and professor of film and digital media at the University of California, Santa Cruz.
    [Show full text]
  • Reginalde M. Hannon Collection of Glass Negatives
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8tx3m36 No online items Reginalde M. Hannon Collection of Glass Negatives Finding aid created by Seaver Center for Western History Research, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County staff using RecordEXPRESS Seaver Center for Western History Research, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County 900 Exposition Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90007-4057 (213) 763-3359 [email protected] http://www.nhm.org/site/research-collections/seaver-center 2017 Reginalde M. Hannon Collection P-282 1 of Glass Negatives Descriptive Summary Title: Reginalde M. Hannon Collection of Glass Negatives Dates: 1918 Collection Number: P-282 Creator/Collector: Mack Sennett, Inc. Mack Sennett Comedies (Firm) Extent: (Boxes: 7 1/2 photo; 1 5x7; 1 4x5; 1 ov folder) Repository: Seaver Center for Western History Research, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Los Angeles, California 90007-4057 Abstract: Glass negatives, in 8x10, 5x7, and odd sizes. Primarily of actors and actresses employed by the Mack Sennett Comedies Co., photographed by Evans Studios, Inc. Language of Material: English Access Research is by appointment only Publication Rights Permission to publish, quote or reproduce must be secured from the repository and the copyright holder Preferred Citation Reginalde M. Hannon Collection of Glass Negatives. Seaver Center for Western History Research, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Scope and Content of Collection Glass negatives, in 8x10, 5x7, and odd sizes. Primarily of actors and actresses employed by the Mack Sennett Comedies Co., photographed by Evans Studios, Inc. (Studio name variations: Evans-Degaston; Nelson Evans Studio). Personalities include May Allison, Bathing Beauties, Betty Compson, Jackie Coogan, Cecil B.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of <I>Early Women Filmmakers 1911–1940</I>
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications -- Department of English English, Department of 2020 Review of Early Women Filmmakers 1911–1940 Wheeler Winston Dixon Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/englishfacpubs Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, Film and Media Studies Commons, Modern Literature Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the English, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications -- Department of English by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. digitalcommons.unl.edu Early Women Filmmakers 1911–1940 (BFI: London, 4-Disc Region 2 Blu-Ray Set, 2019) Wheeler Winston Dixon University of Nebraska–Lincoln After more than a half century of neglect, pioneering women film- makers are finally getting some of the attention they deserve. Fore- most among these women is the figure of Alice Guy Blaché—also known simply as Alice Guy, before she married Herbert Blaché in 1907—who was responsible for numerous “firsts” in cinema history: the first film with narrative La Fée aux Choux (The Cabbage Patch Fairy; 1896), as well as early experiments with color dye processes, synchronized sound recording, multi-reel films, and other cinematic advances. Gaumont put out a set of her French films for that com- pany—she was the head of production for Gaumont between 1896 and 1907—in a superb DVD in 2009 entitled Gaumont Treasures Vol- ume 1 (1897–1913), but this compilation necessarily did not deal with her subsequent work in America, where she founded her own produc- tion company, Solax, and set about making a series of energetic films in every possible genre.
    [Show full text]
  • Creative Industries: Behind the Scenes Inequalities
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Sociology Theses Department of Sociology Fall 12-17-2019 CREATIVE INDUSTRIES: BEHIND THE SCENES INEQUALITIES Sierra C. Nicely Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/sociology_theses Recommended Citation Nicely, Sierra C., "CREATIVE INDUSTRIES: BEHIND THE SCENES INEQUALITIES." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2019. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/sociology_theses/86 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Sociology at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CREATIVE INDUSTRIES: BEHIND THE SCENES INEQUALITIES by SIERRA NICELY Under the Direction of Wendy Simonds, PhD ABSTRACT Film has been a major influence since its creation in the early 20th century. Women have always been involved in the creation of film as a cultural product. However, they have rarely been given positions of power in major film productions. Using qualitative approaches, I examine the different ways in which men and women directors approach creating film. I examine 20 films, half were directed by men and half by women. I selected the twenty films out of two movie genres: Action and Romantic Comedy. These genres were chosen because of their very gendered marketing. My focus was on the different ways in which gender was shown on screen and the differences in approach by men and women directors. The research showed differences in approach of gender but also different approaches in race and sexuality. Future studies should include more analysis on differences by race and sexuality.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at Race-Based Casting and How It Legalizes Racism, Despite Title VII Laws Latonja Sinckler
    Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law Volume 22 | Issue 4 Article 3 2014 And the Oscar Goes to; Well, It Can't Be You, Can It: A Look at Race-Based Casting and How It Legalizes Racism, Despite Title VII Laws Latonja Sinckler Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/jgspl Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Sinckler, Latonja. "And the Oscar Goes to; Well, It Can't Be You, Can It: A Look at Race-Based Casting and How It Legalizes Racism, Despite Title VII Laws." American University Journal of Gender Social Policy and Law 22, no. 4 (2014): 857-891. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sinckler: And the Oscar Goes to; Well, It Can't Be You, Can It: A Look at R AND THE OSCAR GOES TO . WELL, IT CAN’T BE YOU, CAN IT?: A LOOK AT RACE-BASED CASTING AND HOW IT LEGALIZES RACISM, DESPITE TITLE VII LAWS LATONJA SINCKLER I. Introduction ............................................................................................ 858 II. Background ........................................................................................... 862 A. Justifications for Race-Based Casting........................................ 862 1. Authenticity ......................................................................... 862 2. Marketability ....................................................................... 869 B. Stereotyping and Supporting Roles for Minorities .................... 876 III. Analysis ............................................................................................... 878 A. Title VII and the BFOQ Exception ............................................ 878 B.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE on PHILOSOPHY and FILM Thinking Reality and Time Through Film
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PHILOSOPHY AND FILM Thinking Reality and Time through Film ………………………………………………………………………….………….. …………………………………………………………………………….………….. 1 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PHILOSOPHY AND FILM Thinking Reality and Time through Film ………………………………………………………………………….………….. Thinking Reality and Time through Film Proceedings of the International Lisbon Conference on Philosophy and Film: PROGRAMME OVERVIEWS ABSTRACTS CV’S CONTACTS Edited by Susana Viegas …………………………………………………………………………….………….. 2 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PHILOSOPHY AND FILM Thinking Reality and Time through Film ………………………………………………………………………….………….. Thinking Reality and Time through Film Proceedings of the International Lisbon Conference on Philosophy and Film - 6-10 May of 2014 Conference Directors Christine Reeh José Manuel Martins Pedro Calafate Scientific Committee Christine Reeh Claudio Rozzoni José Manuel Martins Maria Teresa Teixeira Susana Viegas Toni Hildebrandt Organizing Comittee Ângela Marques Carla Simões Filipa Afonso Filipa Seabra Filipe Pinto Isabel Machado Joana Ferreira Held at the Faculty of Letters of the University of Lisbon, National Library, Portuguese Film Museum and the Goethe-Institut Lissabon. Organized by the Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa in collaboration with C.R.I.M. Productions, and the Goethe Institut Lissabon. Sponsored by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia. …………………………………………………………………………….………….. 3 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PHILOSOPHY AND FILM Thinking Reality and Time through Film ………………………………………………………………………….………….
    [Show full text]
  • Camera (1920-1922)
    7 l Page To>o "The Digest of the Motion Picture Industry” CAM ERA A Liberal Privilege of Conversion Besides the safety of enormous assets and large and increasing earnings, besides a substantial and profitable yield, there is a very liberal privilege of conversion in the $3 , 000,000 Carnation Milk Products Company Five-Year Sinking Fund 7 % Convertible Gold Notes notes convertible at option after November I creased in past five years. These are , over 400% 1921, and until ten days prior to maturity or redemption into Total assets after deducting all indebtedness, except this note, 7% Cumulative Sinking Fund Preferred Stock on the basis of amount to more than four times principal of this issue. I 00 for these notes and 95 for the stock. With these notes Net earnings for past ten years have averaged more than four at 96J/2 this is equivalent to buying the stock at 91 /i- and one-half times interest charges, and during the past five Thus you see that at your option you have either a long- years more than seven times. term, high yielding preferred stock or a short-term, high- There is no other bonded or funded indebtedness and at yielding note. Preferred stock is subject to call at 1 1 0 and present no outstanding preferred stock. accrued dividends, and the usual features of safety. You will want to invest your savings and surplus funds in This Company is one of the largest and most successful of its this decidedly good investment. Call, write or phone for kind in America.
    [Show full text]
  • Theology in Silent Films, 1902 to 1927
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2010 Skin and Redemption: Theology in Silent Films, 1902 to 1927 Susan Craig Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1794 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Skin and Redemption: Theology in Silent Films, 1902 to 1927 by Susan Craig A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2010 ii © 2010 Susan Jean Craig All Rights Reserved iii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in History in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Martin J. Burke Date Chair of Examining Committee Prof. Helena Rosenblatt Date Executive Officer Prof. Donald Scott Prof. Jonathan Sassi Prof. Marc Dolan THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK Prof. Richard Koszarski RUTGERS UNIVERSITY Supervisory Committee iv Abstract Theology in Silent Films by Susan Craig Adviser: Prof. Martin J. Burke This dissertation analyzes theological concepts in silent moving pictures made for commercial distribution from 1902 to 1927, and examines how directors and scenarists sorted through competing belief systems to select what they anticipated would be palatable theological references for their films. A fundamental assumption of this study is that, the artistic and aesthetic pretensions of many silent-era filmmakers notwithstanding, directors generally made decisions in the conception, production and marketing of films primarily to maximize profits in a ruthlessly competitive environment.
    [Show full text]