The Lindens Barn, Drayton Lane, Horsford

A PHASE I DESK STUDY REPORT TO ADDRESS CONDITION 7 OF PLANNING PERMISSION REFERENCE NO. 20180874 FOR THE RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT OF:

THE LINDENS BARN, DRAYTON LANE, HORSFORD

CLIENT: Mr & Mrs Rudd REFERENCE: DJM/18.288/PhaseI DATE: 24 August 2018

A F Howland Associates Limited The Old Exchange Newmarket Road Cringleford Norwich NR4 6UF

Tel: 01603 250754 Email: [email protected] Website: www.howland.co.uk

1. TERMS OF REFERENCE 1 2. LOCATION 2 3. GEOLOGY 2 4. HYDROLOGY 2 5. HISTORICAL INFORMATION 2 6. CURRENT LAND USES 5 7. WALKOVER SURVEY 5 8. HAZARDOUS GASES AND VAPOURS 7 9. INTRUSIVE INVESTIGATION 8 10. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 8 11. PRELIMINARY CONCEPTUAL MODEL 10 12. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12

APPENDICES APPENDIX A: REFERENCES

APPENDIX B: ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE REPORT

APPENDIX C: TRIAL PIT RECORDS

APPENDIX D: DRAWINGS

APPENDIX E: RISK ASSESSMENT CLASSIFICATION

A Phase I Desk Study Report to Address Condition 7 of Planning Permission Reference No. 20180874 for the Residential Redevelopment of: The Lindens Barn, Drayton Lane, Horsford DJM/18.288/PhaseI 24 August 2018 Page 1

1. TERMS OF REFERENCE

A F Howland Associates Limited was instructed by Mr & Mrs Rudd (the “Client”) to carry out a Phase I Desk Study at The Lindens Barn, Drayton Lane, Horsford, NR10 3AN (Fig. 18.288/PhaseI/01). This was required to address condition 7 of planning permission reference no. 20180874 for the conversion and extension of a former agricultural barn and plot of land for a residential end-use.

This report presents the background environmental and historical data for the site and gives details of a site walkover undertaken to confirm the current condition of the site and surrounding area. The report also includes the findings of a limited intrusive investigation undertaken during the site walkover, with the findings discussed as part of a qualitative contamination risk assessment.

An environmental database report was commissioned to provide certain background information and is included in Appendix B, with relevant details presented where necessary. Other sources of data were used to verify the findings of the environmental database report, supported by anecdotal evidence, and add details where appropriate. A Structural Appraisal report has also been prepared for the site by Frith:Blake Consulting Limited (2018) and is referred to where appropriate.

The report has been carried out in general accordance with accepted best practice and methodologies (BSI, 2017) (DEFRA and EA, 2004) (DCLG, 2010) and was prepared for the sole and exclusive use of the Client and its advisors. Other parties using the contained information do so at their own risk and any duty of care to those parties is specifically excluded subject to copyright as detailed below.

The copyright of any proposal or any data presented in the report, including without exclusion all text and all procedures and methods developed by A F Howland Associates Limited is held by A F Howland Associates Limited and all rights to such are reserved.

No part of the content of, procedures described, or other facets of the report will be copied or used by others outside of the immediate context for which the work was commissioned without the express and specific request and approval to do so in writing.

www.howland.co.uk

Copyright © A F Howland Associates Limited 2018 A Phase I Desk Study Report to Address Condition 7 of Planning Permission Reference No. 20180874 for the Residential Redevelopment of: The Lindens Barn, Drayton Lane, Horsford DJM/18.288/PhaseI 24 August 2018 Page 2

2. LOCATION

The site is located on Drayton Lane, approximately 0.5 km south of the village of Horsford, Norfolk, centred at National Grid reference 619405, 315327 and at an elevation of approximately 35 m above Ordnance Datum (aOD).

3. GEOLOGY

The regional geology is mapped for the area by the British Geological Survey (BGS, 2018) as bedrock of Wroxham Crag Formation overlain by superficial deposits of the Sheringham Cliffs Formation. Superficial Head deposits are mapped adjacent to the east of the site.

4. HYDROLOGY

There are two surface water courses within 500 m, both are drainage ditches approximately 368 m to the east and 420 m to the north. There are no surface water abstraction licences within a kilometre of the site.

The Wroxham Crag Formation is classified as a principal aquifer whilst the superficial deposits are designated secondary (A) aquifer status. All are considered to be of high leaching potential. The site is not located within a groundwater source protection zone. There are no potable water abstraction licences within a kilometre of the site, whilst there is one groundwater abstraction licence within 500 m of the site which is for general farming and domestic purposes.

Regional hydrogeological mapping indicates the piezometric head of groundwater to be at around 20 m aOD which is approximately 15 m below ground level (Institute of Geological Sciences, 1976).

5. HISTORICAL INFORMATION

A review of historical information has been undertaken, including publically available OS mapping and aerial images. This is supported by anecdotal evidence where appropriate.

Since circa 1882, the earliest edition of Ordnance Survey mapping, there has been a structure in the eastern part of the site, which anecdotal evidence suggests was a threshing barn. The central part of the site comprised a structure along the northern boundary with another in the western part, which anecdotal evidence suggests may have

www.howland.co.uk

been cattle sheds. These buildings formed a U-shaped structure set around a courtyard area in the southern part of the site fronting on to a road, as indicated in Figure 1 below which shows the site during the mid-1960s. Over the course of the historical mapping, available until the early 1990s, there have been no significant changes to the site.

Figure 1: Photograph showing the site (bottom left of photograph as indicated approximately in red) and adjacent residential dwelling circa 1964; as supplied by the Client

During the late 1900s, anecdotal evidence suggests that the threshing barn was used to store a tractor, whilst the cattle sheds are understood to have been used by a local builder to store surplus construction materials through to the late 1990s. The site then became disused and the former cattle sheds were demolished leaving only a small section remaining in the north western part of the site. The barn in the east has been unoccupied since the late 1990s and since fallen into a state of dereliction until the present-day.

The central part of the site was purchased by the current owners circa 10 years ago, and was incorporated into their residential dwelling and garden as a walled gravelled- courtyard with lawn and raised beds. The remaining structure in the western part of the site has then been used as domestic storage. This establishes the present-day configuration of the site.

www.howland.co.uk

Since 1882, there has been a residential dwelling, surveyed as The Cottage set in a private garden, immediately adjacent to the north and east of the site, with this and the site fronting onto a road to the south. This establishes the present-day use and layout of this area, with the dwelling becoming surveyed as The Lindens by the 1970s. The road to the south establishes the present-day alignment of Drayton Lane, whilst the B1149 further to the east is also established by 1882.

From the earliest mapping, the wider surrounding area comprised fields, with the village of Horsford approximately 500 m to the north and All Saints’ Church, Vicarage, Church Farm and several other dwellings surveyed approximately 250 to 400 m to the east. The Crown Public House is also surveyed approximately 130 m to the east on the intersection of Drayton Lane and the B1149. This area has remained relatively unchanged, with Horsford developing significantly to the north of the village and sporadically to the west. There has also been limited residential development along the B1149 to the south of Horsford. During the late 1960s to the early 1970s there were also two buildings surveyed on the opposite side of Drayton Lane which are considered residential dwellings.

The environmental database report also highlights three historical industrial land uses, including a nursery approximately 400 m to the south, a sewage pumping station 412 m to the north and an unspecified works approximately 440 m to the north west. These are indicated on the OS mapping from the 1970s.

Aerial images from 1999 to 2007 show very little detail of the site due to dense vegetation, with a reduction in the number of trees shown from the 2007 to 2011 images and the establishment of the gravelled courtyard and lawn on the site.

The 1999 aerial image confirms the immediate surrounding land use to the north, south and east as residential, whilst showing agricultural buildings adjacent to the west. The aerial images do not show any significant changes to the immediate surrounding area, except the 2017 aerial image showing the construction of the Norwich Northern Distributor Road approximately 550 m to the south west, with a new link road from it to the B1149 approximately 170 m south of the site at its closest extent.

www.howland.co.uk

6. CURRENT LAND USES

The current immediate surrounding land use is predominantly residential with arable fields beyond, and Horsford further to the north. The environmental database report (Appendix B) identifies livestock farming facilities 55 m to the east, however this is considered to relate to the agricultural buildings immediately to the west of the site. The environmental database report does not highlight any other current industrial land uses within 250 m of the site.

7. WALKOVER SURVEY

A walkover survey was carried out on 9 August 2018 to enable identification of the current land use and other details not otherwise available from the archival information. The salient features are shown on drawing 18.288/PhaseI/02.

The site comprised a walled courtyard with a double storey barn occupying the eastern part of the site and a single storey garage in the north west. Access to barn was gained directly from Drayton Road, whilst the courtyard was accessed from the residential garden via a timber gate from the north. The far western part of the site was part of the adjacent residential garden and was a timber store and composting area. It will be incorporated into the site as part of the development.

The eastern boundary of the site was demarcated by the barn, whilst mature trees and a wood panelled fence lined the western boundary. The northern and southern perimeters consisted of the flint and brick courtyard walls.

The barn was of a brick and flint construction with a timber framed and pantile-clad roof. The roof was in a state of disrepair and partially collapsed. The structural state of the barn is further outlined in greater detail in the Structural Appraisal Report by Frith:Blake Consulting Limited (2018). Inside the barn, the floor was brick-lined in places but was potentially bare soils in others. It was difficult to fully determine this as there was of a lot of detritus and timber, as well as agricultural materials and partially collapsed parts of the roof covering the floor.

In the south eastern corner of the barn was an above ground gas oil storage tank, shown in Figure 2 below. It was raised approximately 1.4 m off the ground by breezeblocks, with brick-lined flooring beneath. It was a single-skin steel tank measuring 1.5 m long by 0.6 m

www.howland.co.uk

wide by 1.2 m high, suggesting a capacity of approximately 1000 litres. The tank showed signs of rust, with small areas of staining on the floor immediately below the outlet hose, as shown in Figure 3 below. Anecdotal evidence suggests the tank was used to store gas oil for a tractor that was kept in the barn. It is understood that the tank has not been in use for the last fifteen to twenty years, but was recently emptied prior to the current owners purchasing the barn.

Figure 2: Gas oil storage tank in south eastern corner of the barn

Figure 3: Staining at the base of the tank below the outlet hose

www.howland.co.uk

The courtyard area was partially surfaced with gravel overlying a fabric membrane and partially by a lawn. Anecdotal evidence suggests there is concrete hardstanding beneath the fabric membrane. It is also understood that the lawn has showed no signs of poor health that could be associated with potentially contaminated soils since it was laid circa 10 years ago. There were also three raised beds used to grow vegetables and flowers.

The single storey garage in the north western part of the site was of a brick and flint construction, with a timber frame pantile-clad roof. The eastern wall consisted of rendered breezeblocks and a metal garage door. The floor was of concrete hardstanding, which appeared in a good condition. The garage was being used as a store for the residential dwelling with gardening tools and equipment as well as domestic and miscellaneous materials. There was a timber store enclosed by brick walls immediately to the south of the garage. Behind this was a further timber store and compost bins.

Surrounding the site to the north and east was a residential garden, whilst Drayton Lane was immediately to the south with residential gardens on the opposite side. To the west was a pig farm, with the wider surrounding area comprising fields. The centre of the village of Horsford was approximately half a kilometre to the north.

8. HAZARDOUS GASES AND VAPOURS

Building Research Establishment report BR211 (BRE, 2015) indicates that the site is not within an area where specific protection from radon gas is required.

The environmental database report identifies potentially infilled ponds approximately 340 m to the east. There are no historical or current landfill sites within 500 m of the site.

The walkover identified an above ground gas oil storage tank within the barn, which showed limited signs of potential leakages and spillages. Any potential residual contamination in the near surface soils associated with any leakages or spillages could present a source of hazardous vapours.

www.howland.co.uk

9. INTRUSIVE INVESTIGATION

During the site walkover two hand dug trial pits were excavated at the base of the gas oil tank within the barn in order to investigate the near surface soils around the base of the tank and screen for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using a MiniRAE 3000 portable PID.

The positions were set out on site by AFHA and a cable avoidance tool (CAT) was used to sweep the trial pit locations and surrounding areas to locate any services. The approximate locations of the trial pits are shown on drawing 18.288/Phase1/02, included in Appendix and the strata presents on records in Appendix C.

The trial pits, referenced TP01 and TP02, where excavated by hand utilising insulated digging tools. Sampling and soil descriptions have been carried out in accordance with BS EN-1997-2:2007 Eurocode 7 (BSI, 2007) and its UK National Annex supported by BS 5930:2015 (BSI, 2015).

The results of the screening for VOCs is summarised in Table 1 below:

Depth VOC Screening (ppm) (m bgl) TP01 TP02 0.00 6.5 - 0.05 14.9 0.0 0.10 - 0.0 0.20 0.2 0.0 0.50 0.0 - 0.55 - 0.0

Table 1: Results of VOC screening used a MiniRAE 3000 portable PID

10. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

The site is proposed to be developed for a residential end-use, with the conversion of the barn and an addition of an extension, as detailed on drawing 1092/(-)03A, dated April 2018, prepared by William Glover Architectural Technologist which is included in Appendix D. The proposals also include a courtyard garden and car parking as well as a new sewage treatment plant and soakaway in the far western part of the site.

The Wroxham Crag Formation is considered a principal aquifer and the superficial deposits are designated a secondary (A) aquifer, but the site is not within a source protection zone

www.howland.co.uk

and there were no potable groundwater abstraction licences within 500 m. There are no areas of surface water within a distance that could be influenced by the site either.

A review of historical and contemporary archives suggest the site has been occupied by agricultural buildings since at least the late nineteenth century. The site did not change significantly until the late 1990s, when the former cattle sheds were demolished and the site became disused, with the barn falling into a state of disrepair until the present-day. The archives and anecdotal evidence suggest the barn was a threshing barn, which was latterly used to store agricultural machinery and an above ground gas oil tank. The former cattle sheds were known to have been used to store surplus building materials in the latter part of the 1900s as well.

More recently, the central and western part of the site has been a courtyard garden for the adjacent residential dwelling, with no olfactory signs of any significant contamination, as the lawn and other plants have showed no signs of impact from any potential contamination.

The above ground gas oil storage tank within the barn is considered a potential source of contamination if there have been significant spillages or leakages, which could have resulted in residual contamination in the near surface soils. Whilst the tank had begun to rust, it appeared in relatively good condition. There was some localised staining on the floor beneath the outlet hose. Due to the small scale nature of the staining and the position of the tank within the barn, the tank is not considered to pose a significant risk to soils elsewhere on the site beyond the barn. Trial pit TP01 undertaken at the base of the tank, where the staining was present, indicates the staining was restricted to the surface above potential timber flooring. VOC screening on the soils above the flooring showed minor elevations, restricted to the top 0.1 m, with the made ground beneath the flooring showing no significant signs of contamination. Therefore, there is unlikely to be significant mobile contamination that would readily transmit into the underlying natural soils or impact controlled waters. A second trial pit, TP02, adjacent to the tank where brick-lined flooring was present did not record any elevations during VOC screening, re-affirming the limited scale of the staining. Therefore, there is unlikely to be significant residual contamination that could produce significant vapours that would affect the habitation of the barn. Notwithstanding this, it is also understood as part of the development that a new concrete floor is to be laid, such that the current floor is likely to be removed alongside any minor and localised hydrocarbon staining.

www.howland.co.uk

The nearest areas of potentially infilled land are former ponds approximately 340 m to the east, which are indicated to have been filled by the mid-1900s. There is unlikely to be significant ground gas production taking place, and notwithstanding this, due to the distance from the site they are unlikely to pose a significant risk to the site.

11. PRELIMINARY CONCEPTUAL MODEL

Following a review of the archival information and the walkover survey a preliminary conceptual model was devised to determine the risk to appropriate targets from the potential contaminating activities assessed for the site. This collates the evidence gained and establishes the potential linkages that may exist under the principle of “source- pathway-receptor” and is presented in Table 2 below.

A risk category is determined for the potential linkages and an assessment made of risk and the significance of that risk from professional judgement. Risk assessment classification is included in Appendix D. Where appropriate, further work is recommended to assess whether the potential linkages are realised and a revised conceptual model formulated as part of a Phase II investigation.

It should be noted that an assessment of risk to construction workers suggests that only contamination of acute toxicity might represent an unacceptable risk to the health of construction workers but which should be managed through health and safety procedures.

www.howland.co.uk

Source of Risk Pathway Receptor Probability and Reasoning Consequence and Reasoning Contamination Classification

Unlikely – No evidence of significant contamination, Human end- including any residual contamination associated with Medium – Chronic damage to human health Low Risk users the gas oil tank. Small courtyard garden likely to be Direct contact, hardstanding and therefore limits exposure inhalation, ingestion Unlikely – No evidence of potentially significant Minor – Potential short term exposure can Construction contamination noted on site. Construction workers to be managed with PPE and adoption of good Very Low Risk workers be made aware of the potential isolated contamination. hygiene practices Medium – Impact to principal aquifer on Potentially Unlikely – No evidence of significant mobile or Percolation of Groundwater site, but not within a groundwater source Low Risk contaminated leachable contamination on the site, including beneath leachate / mobile protection zone and no abstractions nearby. soils (historical the tank as trial pitting and VOC screening indicates and recent use) contaminants Mild – No significant surface water close to Surface water hydrocarbon staining is minor and spatially limited. Very Low Risk site and not in protection zone Buildings and Unlikely – No significant potential sources of aggressive Medium – Significant damage to buildings Direct Contact Low Risk Services chemicals identified. rendering unsafe to occupy Unlikely – Hydrocarbon staining limited to surface and Medium – Chronic damage to human health Permeation through Human end- unlikely to have impacted underlying soils. Laying from permeation of plastic water supply Low Risk water supply pipes users supply pipes in clean surround may also be prudent if pipes made ground is present Potentially Human end- Unlikely – No infilled areas of land close enough to the infilled land, Gas migration users site to present a viable source of ground gas. Deep Severe – Acute risk to potential end users Low Risk1 deep made through permeable Structures made ground not expected ground strata, ingress and accumulation in Human end- Radon Gas structures Unlikely – Site outside of radon affected area Medium – Chronic risk to human end users Low Risk users Vapour migration Unlikely – Hydrocarbon staining was limited to surface Vapours from through permeable and VOC screening noted minor elevations restricted to Human end- residual soil strata, ingress and top 0.1 m in a single position. Unlikely to generate Medium – Chronic damage to human health Low Risk users contamination accumulation in significant vapours, with staining likely to be removed structures during redevelopment Notes: 1whilst the comparison of consequence against probability results in a low/moderate risk classification, the risk has been downgraded to low based on the negligible risk of gas generation Table 2 – Preliminary Conceptual Site Model

12. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

1. A Phase I Desk Study was undertaken to address Condition 7 of Planning Permission Reference No. 20180874 for the conversion and extension of an agricultural building and plot of land at The Lindens Barn, Drayton Lane, Horsford to a residential end-use. 2. Geological mapping indicates the site to be underlain by bedrock of the Wroxham Crag Formation, overlain by superficial deposits of the Sheringham Cliffs Formation. The bedrock geology is designated a principal aquifer status, whilst the superficial deposits are designated a secondary (A) aquifer status. The site is not within a source protection zone and there are no groundwater abstraction licences within a distance that could be impacted by the site. 3. The nearest surface water course are drainage ditches approximately 368 m to the east and 420 m to the north. 4. The earliest historical records indicate the site was occupied by agricultural buildings, with the site not changing significantly until the late 1990s. The site comprised a threshing barn in the east, which latterly stored agricultural machinery and an above ground gas oil tank, before becoming disused in the late 1990s and fell into a state of disrepair to the present-day. Cattle sheds were present in the north and west, which were latterly used to store surplus building materials before the buildings were partially demolished in the late 1990s. This area was disused until the current owners purchased this part of the site and incorporated into their dwelling as a courtyard garden. 5. The gas oil tank, present within the barn, was raised off the ground and in relatively good condition. There was minor hydrocarbon staining beneath the outlet hose, with trial pitting and VOC screening indicating the staining to be limited to the surface with minor VOC levels in the top 0.1 m. There were no olfactory signs of hydrocarbon contamination in the soils beneath 0.1 m or in TP02 at the base of the tank. 6. A low risk to human end-users from direct contact, inhalation or ingestion of contaminated soil and dust has been concluded given significant contamination is considered unlikely. 7. Providing construction workers wear appropriate PPE and adopt suitable hygiene precautions a very low risk has been identified. 8. Groundwater and surface water are considered to be at low and very low risk respectively as there is no evidence of significant mobile or leachable

www.howland.co.uk

contamination, including beneath the tank as trial pitting and VOC screening indicates hydrocarbon staining is minor and spatially limited. 9. Building materials are considered to be at low risk from being affected by aggressive chemicals arising from the former use of the site. Although water supply pipes are considered to be at a low risk, it would be prudent to place these within a clean surround to reduce the potential for impact by any organic contaminants, unless they can be laid directly into natural ground. 10. The minor hydrocarbon staining below the tank and minor VOC levels in TP01, suggest there is unlikely to be a significant risk from vapours associated with any residual contamination associated with any leaks or spills from the tank. A low risk was therefore concluded to human end-users from hazardous vapours. 11. There is no potentially infilled land or other ground gas sources close to the site and it is not in a radon affected area. As such, a low risk from ground and radon gas is concluded. 12. No further assessment is required to ensure that the site is suitable for the proposed end-use. If any suspected contamination is encountered during construction the advice of a specialist should be sought with respect to appropriate action to be taken.

D J Myhill Dr A F Howland MSc FGS MSc PhD DIC CEng FIMMM CGeol FGS

A F HOWLAND ASSOCIATES 24 August 2018

www.howland.co.uk

APPENDIX A: REFERENCES

BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY (BGS). 2018. OpenGeoscience Website. Geology of Britain Viewer. www.bgs.ac.uk/opengeoscience BRITISH RESEARCH ESTABLISHMENT (BRE). 2015. BRE 211. Radon: Guidance on protective measures for new buildings. British Research Establishment. Bracknell.

BRITISH STANDARDS INSTUTION (BSI). 2015. BS 5930:2015 Code of practice for ground investigations. British Standards Institution. London.

BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION (BSI). 2017. BS 10175:2011+A2:2017. Code of practice for investigation of potentially contaminated Sites. British Standards Institution. London.

DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (DCLG). The Building Regulations. 2013. England. Approved Document C: Site preparation and resistance to contaminants and moisture, 2004 and incorporating 2010 and 2013 amendments.

DEFRA AND THE ENVIRONMENT AGENCY. 2004. Model Procedures for the Management of Land Contamination. Contaminated Land Report 11. Environment Agency, Bristol.

FRITH:BLAKE CONSULTING LIMITED. 2018. The Lindens Barn, Horsford, Norwich – Structural Appraisal. Dated 20 April 2018.

INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES. 1976. Hydrogeological map of Northern East Anglia - Sheet 1. Regional hydrogeological characteristics and explanatory notes. NERC, London.

www.howland.co.uk

APPENDIX B: ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE REPORT

Groundsure Enviro Insight Reference: GS-5295395

Address: THE LINDENS BARN, DRAYTON LANE, HORSFORD, NORWICH, NR10 3AN

Date: 3 Aug 2018

Reference: GS-5295395

Client: A F Howland Associates

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE Aerial Photograph Capture date: 15-May-2014 Grid Reference: 619401,315325 Site Size: 0.05ha

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 2 Contents Page

Contents Page 3 Overview of Findings 6 Using this report 10 1. Historical Land Use 11 1. Historical Industrial Sites 12 1.1 Potentially Contaminative Uses identified from 1:10,000 scale Mapping...... 12 1.2 Additional Information – Historical Tank Database...... 12 1.3 Additional Information – Historical Energy Features Database...... 12 1.4 Additional Information – Historical Petrol and Fuel Site Database...... 12 1.5 Additional Information – Historical Garage and Motor Vehicle Repair Database...... 13 1.6 Historical military sites...... 13 1.7 Potentially Infilled Land...... 13 2. Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers Map 14 2. Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers 15 2.1 Industrial Sites Holding Licences and/or Authorisations...... 15 2.1.1 Records of historic IPC Authorisations within 500m of the study site:...... 15 2.1.2 Records of Part A(1) and IPPC Authorised Activities within 500m of the study site:...... 15 2.1.3 Records of Red List Discharge Consents (potentially harmful discharges to controlled waters) within 500m of the study site:...... 15 2.1.4 Records of List 1 Dangerous Substances Inventory Sites within 500m of the study site:...... 15 2.1.5 Records of List 2 Dangerous Substance Inventory Sites within 500m of the study site:...... 15 2.1.6 Records of Part A(2) and Part B Activities and Enforcements within 500m of the study site: ...... 16 2.1.7 Records of Category 3 or 4 Radioactive Substances Authorisations:...... 16 2.1.8 Records of Licensed Discharge Consents within 500m of the study site:...... 16 2.1.9 Records of Water Industry Referrals (potentially harmful discharges to the public sewer) within 500m of the study site: ...... 16 2.1.10 Records of Planning Hazardous Substance Consents and Enforcements within 500m of the study site:...... 16 2.2 Dangerous or Hazardous Sites...... 16 2.3 Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Recorded Pollution Incidents...... 17 2.3.1 Records of National Incidents Recording System, List 2 within 500m of the study site:...... 17 2.3.2 Records of National Incidents Recording System, List 1 within 500m of the study site:...... 17 2.4 Sites Determined as Contaminated Land under Part 2A EPA 1990...... 17 3. Landfill and Other Waste Sites Map 18 3. Landfill and Other Waste Sites 19 3.1 Landfill Sites...... 19 3.1.1 Records from Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales landfill data within 1000m of the study site: ...... 19 3.1.2 Records of Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales historic landfill sites within 1500m of the study site: ...... 19 3.1.3 Records of BGS/DoE non-operational landfill sites within 1500m of the study site:...... 19 3.1.4 Records of Landfills from Local Authority and Historical Mapping Records within 1500m of the study site:...... 19 3.2 Other Waste Sites...... 20 3.2.1 Records of waste treatment, transfer or disposal sites within 500m of the study site: ...... 20 3.2.2 Records of Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales licensed waste sites within 1500m of the study site: ...... 20 4. Current Land Use Map 21 4. Current Land Uses 22 4.1 Current Industrial Data...... 22 4.2 Petrol and Fuel Sites...... 22 4.3 National Grid High Voltage Underground Electricity Transmission Cables...... 22 4.4 National Grid High Pressure Gas Transmission Pipelines...... 23 Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 3 5. Geology 24 5.1 Artificial Ground and Made Ground...... 24 5.2 Superficial Ground and Drift Geology ...... 24 5.3 Bedrock and Solid Geology ...... 24 6 Hydrogeology and Hydrology 25 6a. Aquifer Within Superficial Geology 25 6b. Aquifer Within Bedrock Geology and Abstraction Licences 26 6c. Hydrogeology – Source Protection Zones and Potable Water Abstraction Licences 27 6d. Hydrogeology – Source Protection Zones within confined aquifer 28 6e. Hydrology – Watercourse Network and River Quality 29 6.Hydrogeology and Hydrology 30 6.1 Aquifer within Superficial Deposits...... 30 6.2 Aquifer within Bedrock Deposits...... 30 6.3 Groundwater Abstraction Licences...... 31 6.4 Surface Water Abstraction Licences...... 33 6.5 Potable Water Abstraction Licences...... 34 6.6 Source Protection Zones...... 34 6.7 Source Protection Zones within Confined Aquifer...... 34 6.8 Groundwater Vulnerability and Soil Leaching Potential...... 34 6.9 River Quality...... 35 6.9.1 Biological Quality:...... 35 6.9.2 Chemical Quality:...... 35 6.10 Ordnance Survey MasterMap Water Network...... 35 6.11 Surface Water Features...... 36 7a. Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Flood Map for Planning (from rivers and the sea) 37 7b. Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Risk of Flooding from Rivers and the Sea (RoFRaS) Map 38 7 Flooding 39 7.1 River and Coastal Zone 2 Flooding...... 39 7.2 River and Coastal Zone 3 Flooding...... 39 7.3 Risk of Flooding from Rivers and the Sea (RoFRaS) Flood Rating...... 39 7.4 Flood Defences...... 39 7.5 Areas benefiting from Flood Defences...... 39 7.6 Areas benefiting from Flood Storage...... 40 7.7 Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Areas...... 40 7.8 Groundwater Flooding Confidence Areas...... 40 8. Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Map 41 8. Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites 42 8.1 Records of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) within 2000m of the study site:...... 42 8.2 Records of National Nature Reserves (NNR) within 2000m of the study site:...... 42 8.3 Records of Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) within 2000m of the study site:...... 42 8.4 Records of Special Protection Areas (SPA) within 2000m of the study site:...... 42 8.5 Records of Ramsar sites within 2000m of the study site:...... 42 8.6 Records of Ancient Woodland within 2000m of the study site: ...... 43 8.7 Records of Local Nature Reserves (LNR) within 2000m of the study site:...... 43 8.8 Records of World Heritage Sites within 2000m of the study site:...... 43 8.9 Records of Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 2000m of the study site: ...... 43 8.10 Records of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) within 2000m of the study site: ...... 43 8.11 Records of National Parks (NP) within 2000m of the study site: ...... 44 8.12 Records of Nitrate Sensitive Areas within 2000m of the study site:...... 44 8.13 Records of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones within 2000m of the study site:...... 44 Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 4 8.14 Records of Green Belt land within 2000m of the study site:...... 44 9. Natural Hazards Findings 45 9.1 Detailed BGS GeoSure Data...... 45 9.1.1 Shrink Swell...... 45 9.1.2 Landslides...... 45 9.1.3 Soluble Rocks...... 45 9.1.4 Compressible Ground...... 46 9.1.5 Collapsible Rocks...... 46 9.1.6 Running Sand...... 46 9.2 Radon...... 47 9.2.1 Radon Affected Areas...... 47 9.2.2 Radon Protection...... 47 10. Mining 48 10.1 Coal Mining...... 48 10.2 Non-Coal Mining...... 48 10.3 Brine Affected Areas ...... 48 Contact Details 49 Standard Terms and Conditions 51

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 5 Overview of Findings

For further details on each dataset, please refer to each individual section in the main report as listed. Where the database has been searched a numerical result will be recorded. Where the database has not been searched '-' will be recorded.

Section 1: Historical Industrial Sites On-site 0-50 51-250 251-500

1.1 Potentially Contaminative Uses identified from 1:10,000 scale 0 0 0 4 mapping

1.2 Additional Information – Historical Tank Database 0 0 0 4

1.3 Additional Information – Historical Energy Features Database 0 0 0 1

1.4 Additional Information – Historical Petrol and Fuel Site 0 0 0 0 Database

1.5 Additional Information – Historical Garage and Motor Vehicle 0 0 0 0 Repair Database

1.6 Historical military sites 0 0 0 0

1.7 Potentially Infilled Land 0 0 0 4

Section 2: Environmental Permits, Incidents and On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 Registers

2.1 Industrial Sites Holding Environmental Permits and/or Authorisations

2.1.1 Records of historic IPC Authorisations 0 0 0 0

2.1.2 Records of Part A(1) and IPPC Authorised Activities 0 0 0 0

2.1.3 Records of Red List Discharge Consents 0 0 0 0

2.1.4 Records of List 1 Dangerous Substances Inventory sites 0 0 0 0

2.1.5 Records of List 2 Dangerous Substances Inventory sites 0 0 0 0

2.1.6 Records of Part A(2) and Part B Activities and Enforcements 0 0 0 0

2.1.7 Records of Category 3 or 4 Radioactive Substances 0 0 0 0 Authorisations

2.1.8 Records of Licensed Discharge Consents 0 0 0 0

2.1.9 Records of Water Industry Referrals 0 0 0 0

2.1.10 Records of Planning Hazardous Substance Consents and 0 0 0 0 Enforcements within 500m of the study site

2.2 Records of COMAH and NIHHS sites 0 0 0 0

2.3 Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Recorded Pollution Incidents

2.3.1 National Incidents Recording System, List 2 0 0 0 0

2.3.2 National Incidents Recording System, List 1 0 0 0 0

2.4 Sites Determined as Contaminated Land under Part 2A EPA 0 0 0 0 1990

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 6 1000- On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 Section 3: Landfill and Other Waste Sites 1500

3.1 Landfill Sites

3.1.1 Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Registered 0 0 0 0 0 Not searched Landfill Sites

3.1.2 Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Historic 0 0 0 0 0 1 Landfill Sites

3.1.3 BGS/DoE Landfill Site Survey 0 0 0 0 0 0

3.1.4 Records of Landfills in Local Authority and Historical 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mapping Records

3.2 Landfill and Other Waste Sites Findings

3.2.1 Operational and Non-Operational Waste Treatment, 0 0 0 0 Not searched Not searched Transfer and Disposal Sites

3.2.2 Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Licensed 0 0 0 0 0 2 Waste Sites

Section 4: Current Land Use On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500

4.1 Current Industrial Sites Data 0 0 1 Not searched

4.2 Records of Petrol and Fuel Sites 0 0 0 0

4.3 National Grid Underground Electricity Cables 0 0 0 0

4.4 National Grid Gas Transmission Pipelines 0 0 0 0

Section 5: Geology

5.1 Records of Artificial Ground and Made Ground present beneath None identified the study site

5.2 Records of Superficial Ground and Drift Geology present Identified beneath the study site

5.3 For records of Bedrock and Solid Geology beneath the study site see the detailed findings section.

Section 6: Hydrogeology and Hydrology 0-500m

6.1 Records of Strata Classification in the Superficial Geology Identified within 500m of the study site

6.2 Records of Strata Classification in the Bedrock Geology within Identified 500m of the study site 1000- On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 2000 6.3 Groundwater Abstraction Licences (within 2000m of the study 0 0 0 1 14 3 site)

6.4 Surface Water Abstraction Licences (within 2000m of the study 0 0 0 0 0 2 site)

6.5 Potable Water Abstraction Licences (within 2000m of the study 0 0 0 0 0 0 site)

6.6 Source Protection Zones (within 500m of the study site) 0 0 0 0 Not searched Not searched

6.7 Source Protection Zones within Confined Aquifer 0 0 0 0 Not searched Not searched

6.8 Groundwater Vulnerability and Soil Leaching Potential (within #250GWV #500GWV 1 0 Not searched Not searched 500m of the study site) # #

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 7 Section 6: Hydrogeology and Hydrology 0-500m 1000- On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 1500 6.9 Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales information on No No No No No No river quality within 1500m of the study site

6.10 Ordnance Survey MasterMap Water Network entries within 0 0 0 16 Not searched Not searched 500m of the site

6.11 Surface water features within 250m of the study site No No No Not searched Not searched Not searched

Section 7: Flooding

7.1 Enviroment Agency Zone 2 floodplains within 250m of the None identified study site

7.2 Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Zone 3 None identified floodplains within 250m of the study site

7.3 Risk of flooding from Rivers and the Sea (RoFRaS) rating for Very Low the study site

7.4 Flood Defences within 250m of the study site None identified

7.5 Areas benefiting from Flood Defences within 250m of the study None identified site

7.6 Areas used for Flood Storage within 250m of the study site None identified

7.7 Maximum BGS Groundwater Flooding susceptibility within 50m Limited potential of the study site

7.8 BGS confidence rating for the Groundwater Flooding Low susceptibility areas

1000- Section 8: Designated Environmentally Sensitive On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 Sites 2000

8.1 Records of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) 0 0 0 0 0 0

8.2 Records of National Nature Reserves (NNR) 0 0 0 0 0 0

8.3 Records of Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) 0 0 0 0 0 0

8.4 Records of Special Protection Areas (SPA) 0 0 0 0 0 0

8.5 Records of Ramsar sites 0 0 0 0 0 0

8.6 Records of Ancient Woodlands 0 0 0 0 0 2

8.7 Records of Local Nature Reserves (LNR) 0 0 0 0 0 0

8.8 Records of World Heritage Sites 0 0 0 0 0 0

8.9 Records of Environmentally Sensitive Areas 0 0 0 1 1 0

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 8 1000- Section 8: Designated Environmentally Sensitive On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 Sites 2000

8.10 Records of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) 0 0 0 0 0 0

8.11 Records of National Parks 0 0 0 0 0 0

8.12 Records of Nitrate Sensitive Areas 0 0 0 0 0 0

8.13 Records of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones 2 0 0 0 2 0

8.14 Records of Green Belt land 0 0 0 0 0 0

Section 9: Natural Hazards

9.1 Maximum risk of natural ground subsidence Very Low

9.1.1 Maximum Shrink-Swell hazard rating identified on the study Negligible site

9.1.2 Maximum Landslides hazard rating identified on the study Very Low site

9.1.3 Maximum Soluble Rocks hazard rating identified on the Negligible study site

9.1.4 Maximum Compressible Ground hazard rating identified on Negligible the study site

9.1.5 Maximum Collapsible Rocks hazard rating identified on the Very Low study site

9.1.6 Maximum Running Sand hazard rating identified on the Very Low study site

9.2 Radon

9.2.1 Is the property in a Radon Affected Area as defined by the The site is not in a Radon Affected Area, as less than 1% of properties Health Protection Agency (HPA) and if so what percentage of are above the Action Level. homes are above the Action Level?

9.2.2 Is the property in an area where Radon Protection are required for new properties or extensions to existing ones as No radon protective measures are necessary. described in publication BR211 by the Building Research Establishment?

Section 10: Mining

10.1 Coal mining areas within 75m of the study site None identified

10.2 Non-Coal Mining areas within 50m of the study site boundary None identified

10.3 Brine affected areas within 75m of the study site None identified

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 9 Using this report The following report is designed by Environmental Consultants for Environmental Professionals bringing together the most up-to-date market leading environmental data. This report is provided under and subject to the Terms & Conditions agreed between Groundsure and the Client. The document contains the following sections: 1. Historical Industrial Sites Provides information on past land uses that may pose a risk to the study site in terms of potential contamination from activities or processes. Potentially Infilled Land features are also included. This search is conducted using radii of up to 500m. 2. Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers Provides information on Regulated Industrial Activities and Pollution Incidents as recorded by Regulatory Authorit- ies, and sites determined as Contaminated Land. This search is conducted using radii up to 500m. 3. Landfills and Other Waste Sites Provides information on landfills and other waste sites that may pose a risk to the study site. This search is conduc - ted using radii up to 1500m. 4. Current Land Uses Provides information on current land uses that may pose a risk to the study site in terms of potential contamination from activities or processes. These searches are conducted using radii of up to 500m. This includes information on potentially contaminative industrial sites, petrol stations and fuel sites as well as high pressure gas pipelines and underground electricity transmission lines. 5. Geology Provides information on artificial and superficial deposits and bedrock beneath the study site. 6. Hydrogeology and Hydrology Provides information on productive strata within the bedrock and superficial geological layers, abstraction licences, Source Protection Zones (SPZs) and river quality. These searches are conducted using radii of up to 2000m. 7. Flooding Provides information on river and coastal flooding, flood defences, flood storage areas and groundwater flood areas. This search is conducted using radii of up to 250m. 8. Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Provides information on the Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), National Nature Reserves (NNR), Special Areas of Conservation (SAC), Special Protection Areas (SPA), Ramsar sites, Local Nature Reserves (LNR), Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), National Parks (NP), Environmentally Sensitive Areas, Nitrate Sensitive Areas, Nitrate Vulnerable Zones and World Heritage Sites and Scheduled Ancient Woodland. These searches are conducted using radii of up to 2000m. 9. Natural Hazards Provides information on a range of natural hazards that may pose a risk to the study site. These factors include natural ground subsidence and radon.. 10. Mining Provides information on areas of coal and non-coal mining and brine affected areas. 11. Contacts This section of the report provides contact points for statutory bodies and data providers that may be able to provide further information on issues raised within this report. Alternatively, Groundsure provide a free Technical Helpline (08444 159000) for further information and guidance. Note: Maps Only certain features are placed on the maps within the report. All features represented on maps found within this search are given an identification number. This number identifies the feature on the mapping and correlates it to the additional information provided below. This identification number precedes all other information and takes the following format -Id: 1, Id: 2, etc. Where numerous features on the same map are in such close proximity that the numbers would obscure each other a letter identifier is used instead to represent the features. (e.g. Three features which overlap may be given the identifier “A” on the map and would be identified separately as features 1A, 3A, 10A on the data tables provided). Where a feature is reported in the data tables to a distance greater than the map area, it is noted in the data table as “Not Shown”. All distances given in this report are in Metres (m). Directions are given as compass headings such as N: North, E: East, NE: North East from the nearest point of the study site boundary.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 10 1. Historical Land Use

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2018. Ordnance Survey licence 100035207.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 11 1. Historical Industrial Sites

1.1 Potentially Contaminative Uses identified from 1:10,000 scale Mapping

The systematic analysis of data extracted from standard 1:10,560 and 1:10,000 scale historical maps provides the following information:

Records of sites with a potentially contaminative past land use within 500m of the search boundary: 4

ID Distance [m] Direction Use Date 1A 395 S Nurseries 1981 2A 395 S Nurseries 1973 3 412 N Sewage Pumping Station 1974 4 438 NW Unspecified Works 1974

1.2 Additional Information – Historical Tank Database

The systematic analysis of data extracted from High Detailed 1:1,250 and 1:2,500 scale historical maps provides the following information.

Records of historical tanks within 500m of the search boundary: 4

ID Distance (m) Direction Use Date 5B 299 N Tanks 1991 6B 301 N Tanks 1996 7B 301 N Tanks 1997 8B 301 N Tanks 1999

1.3 Additional Information – Historical Energy Features Database

The systematic analysis of data extracted from High Detailed 1:1,250 and 1:2,500 scale historical maps provides the following information.

Records of historical energy features within 500m of the search boundary: 1

ID Distance (m) Direction Use Date 9 476 N Electricity Substation 1999

1.4 Additional Information – Historical Petrol and Fuel Site Database

The systematic analysis of data extracted from High Detailed 1:1,250 and 1:2,500 scale historical maps

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 12 provides the following information.

Records of historical petrol stations and fuel sites within 500m of the search boundary: 0

Database searched and no data found.

1.5 Additional Information – Historical Garage and Motor Vehicle Repair Database

The systematic analysis of data extracted from High Detailed 1:1,250 and 1:2,500 scale historical maps provides the following information.

Records of historical garage and motor vehicle repair sites within 500m of the search boundary: 0

Database searched and no data found.

1.6 Historical military sites

Certain military installations were not noted on historic mapping for security reasons. Whilst not all military land is necessarily of concern, Groundsure has researched and digitised a number of Ordnance Factories and other military industrial features (e.g. Ordnance Depots, Munitions Testing Grounds) which may be of contaminative concern. This research was drawn from a number of different sources, and should not be regarded as a definitive or exhaustive database of potentially contaminative military installations. The boundaries of sites within this database have been estimated from the best evidence available to Groundsure at the time of compilation. Records of historical military sites within 500m of the search boundary: 0 Database searched and no data found.

1.7 Potentially Infilled Land

Records of Potentially Infilled Features from 1:10,000 scale mapping within 500m of the study site: 4

The following Historical Potentially Infilled Features derived from the Historical Mapping information is provided by Groundsure: ID Distance(m) Direction Use Date 10C 329 E Ponds 1884 11C 339 E Pond 1953 12C 341 E Pond 1948 13C 342 E Pond 1908

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 13 2. Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers Map

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2018. Ordnance Survey licence 100035207.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 14 2. Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers

2.1 Industrial Sites Holding Licences and/or Authorisations

Searches of information provided by the Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales and Local Authorities reveal the following information:

2.1.1 Records of historic IPC Authorisations within 500m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

2.1.2 Records of Part A(1) and IPPC Authorised Activities within 500m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

2.1.3 Records of Red List Discharge Consents (potentially harmful discharges to controlled waters) within 500m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

2.1.4 Records of List 1 Dangerous Substances Inventory Sites within 500m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

2.1.5 Records of List 2 Dangerous Substance Inventory Sites within 500m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 15 2.1.6 Records of Part A(2) and Part B Activities and Enforcements within 500m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

2.1.7 Records of Category 3 or 4 Radioactive Substances Authorisations:

Database searched and no data found.

2.1.8 Records of Licensed Discharge Consents within 500m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

2.1.9 Records of Water Industry Referrals (potentially harmful discharges to the public sewer) within 500m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

2.1.10 Records of Planning Hazardous Substance Consents and Enforcements within 500m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

2.2 Dangerous or Hazardous Sites

Records of COMAH & NIHHS sites within 500m of the study site: 0

Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 16 2.3 Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Recorded Pollution Incidents

2.3.1 Records of National Incidents Recording System, List 2 within 500m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

2.3.2 Records of National Incidents Recording System, List 1 within 500m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

2.4 Sites Determined as Contaminated Land under Part 2A EPA 1990

Records of sites determined as contaminated land under Section 78R of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 are there within 500m of the study site 0

Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 17 3. Landfill and Other Waste Sites Map

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2018. Ordnance Survey licence 100035207.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 18 3. Landfill and Other Waste Sites

3.1 Landfill Sites

3.1.1 Records from Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales landfill data within 1000m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

3.1.2 Records of Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales historic landfill sites within 1500m of the study site:

The following landfill records are represented as either points or polygons on the Landfill and Other Waste Sites map:

Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Site Address: Between Hall Lane and Licence Issue: 12-Apr-1980 Reepham Road, Drayton Licence Surrendered: Waste Licence: Yes Licence Holder Address: - Not 1264 S Site Reference: WD 641 Operator: Drayton Farms Limited shown Waste Type: Inert Licence Holder: Drayton Farms Environmental Permitting Regulations First Recorded: 13-Apr-1980 (Waste) Reference: - Last Recorded: -

3.1.3 Records of BGS/DoE non-operational landfill sites within 1500m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

3.1.4 Records of Landfills from Local Authority and Historical Mapping Records within 1500m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 19 3.2 Other Waste Sites

3.2.1 Records of waste treatment, transfer or disposal sites within 500m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

3.2.2 Records of Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales licensed waste sites within 1500m of the study site:

The following waste treatment, transfer or disposal sites records are represented as points on the Landfill and Other Waste Sites map:

Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Site Address: Rossfield, Reepham Road, Issue Date: 10/01/2012 Horsford, Norwich, Norfolk, NR10 3AL Effective Date: - Type: 75kte HCI Waste TS + treatment Modified: 01/03/2016 Size: < 25000 tonnes Surrendered Date: - Not 618311 Environmental Permitting Regulations 1108 W Expiry Date: - shown 315032 (Waste) Licence Number: MIL104 Cancelled Date: - EPR reference: EA/EPR/DB3733DX/S002 Status: Modified Operator: Mr Noel Miles & Mr Darren Miles Site Name: Rossfield Waste Management licence No: 103660 Correspondence Address: - Annual Tonnage: 74999.0 Site Address: Rossfield, Reepham Road, Issue Date: 01/03/2016 Horsford, Norwich, Norfolk, NR10 3AL Effective Date: - Type: Physical Treatment Facility Modified: - Size: >= 25000 tonnes < 75000 tonnes Surrendered Date: - Environmental Permitting Regulations Not 618200 Expiry Date: - 1224 W (Waste) Licence Number: AKS001 shown 315000 Cancelled Date: - EPR reference: EA/EPR/CB3401XC/A001 Status: Issued Operator: Green Planet Environmental Site Name: Green Planet Environmental Recycling Ltd Recycling Ltd Waste Management licence No: 402023 Correspondence Address: - Annual Tonnage: 73900.0

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 20 4. Current Land Use Map

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2018. Ordnance Survey licence 100035207.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 21 4. Current Land Uses

4.1 Current Industrial Data

Records of potentially contaminative industrial sites within 250m of the study site: 1

The following records are represented as points on the Current Land Uses map.

Distance Directio ID Company NGR Address Activity Category (m) n The Barn, Drayton Lane, 619476 1 55 E L Isgate Horsford, Norwich, NR10 Livestock Farming Farming 315325 3AN

4.2 Petrol and Fuel Sites

Records of petrol or fuel sites within 500m of the study site: 0

Database searched and no data found.

4.3 National Grid High Voltage Underground Electricity Transmission Cables

This dataset identifies the high voltage electricity transmission lines running between generating power plants and electricity substations. The dataset does not include the electricity distribution network (smaller, lower voltage cables distributing power from substations to the local user network). This information has been extracted from databases held by National Grid and is provided for information only with no guarantee as to its completeness or accuracy. National Grid do not offer any warranty as to the accuracy of the available data and are excluded from any liability for any such inaccuracies or errors.

Records of National Grid high voltage underground electricity transmission cables within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 22 4.4 National Grid High Pressure Gas Transmission Pipelines

This dataset identifies high-pressure, large diameter pipelines which carry gas between gas terminals, power stations, compressors and storage facilities. The dataset does not include the Local Transmission System (LTS) which supplies gas directly into homes and businesses. This information has been extracted from databases held by National Grid and is provided for information only with no guarantee as to its completeness or accuracy. National Grid do not offer any warranty as to the accuracy of the available data and are excluded from any liability for any such inaccuracies or errors.

Records of National Grid high pressure gas transmission pipelines within 500m of the study site: 0

Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 23 5. Geology

5.1 Artificial Ground and Made Ground

Database searched and no data found.

The database has been searched on site, including a 50m buffer.

5.2 Superficial Ground and Drift Geology

The database has been searched on site, including a 50m buffer.

Lex Code Description Rock Type SMCL-XSV SHERINGHAM CLIFFS FORMATION SAND AND GRAVEL HEAD-XCZSV HEAD CLAY, SILT, SAND AND GRAVEL

5.3 Bedrock and Solid Geology

The database has been searched on site, including a 50m buffer.

Lex Code Description Rock Type WRCG-XSV WROXHAM CRAG FORMATION SAND AND GRAVEL

(Derived from the BGS 1:50,000 Digital Geological Map of Great Britain)

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 24 6 Hydrogeology and Hydrology 6a. Aquifer Within Superficial Geology

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2018 Ordnance Survey licence 100035207.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 25 6b. Aquifer Within Bedrock Geology and Abstraction Licences

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2018 Ordnance Survey licence 100035207.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 26 6c. Hydrogeology – Source Protection Zones and Potable Water Abstraction Licences NW N NE

W E

SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2018 Ordnance Survey licence 100035207.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 27 6d. Hydrogeology – Source Protection Zones within confined aquifer NW N NE

W E

SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2018 Ordnance Survey licence 100035207.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 28 6e. Hydrology – Watercourse Network and River Quality

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2018. Ordnance Survey licence 100035207.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 29 6.Hydrogeology and Hydrology

6.1 Aquifer within Superficial Deposits

Records of strata classification within the superficial geology at or in proximity to the property Yes

From 1 April 2010, the Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales's Groundwater Protection Policy has been using aquifer designations consistent with the Water Framework Directive. For further details on the designation and interpretation of this information, please refer to the Groundsure Enviro Insight User Guide.

The following aquifer records are shown on the Aquifer within Superficial Geology Map (6a):

Distanc ID Direction Designation Description e (m) Permeable layers capable of supporting water supplies at a local rather than 1 0 On Site Secondary A strategic scale, and in some cases forming an important source of base flow to rivers. These are generally aquifers formerly classified as minor aquifers Predominantly lower permeability layers which may store/yield limited amounts of 9 192 E Secondary B groundwater due to localised features such as fissures, thin permeable horizons and weathering. These are generally the water-bearing parts of the former non-aquifers Permeable layers capable of supporting water supplies at a local rather than 2 317 S Secondary A strategic scale, and in some cases forming an important source of base flow to rivers. These are generally aquifers formerly classified as minor aquifers Permeable layers capable of supporting water supplies at a local rather than 3 428 N Secondary A strategic scale, and in some cases forming an important source of base flow to rivers. These are generally aquifers formerly classified as minor aquifers

6.2 Aquifer within Bedrock Deposits

Records of strata classification within the bedrock geology at or in proximity to the property Yes

The following aquifer records are shown on the Aquifer within Bedrock Geology Map (6b):

Distanc ID Direction Designation Description e (m) Geology of high intergranular and/or fracture permeability, usually providing a high 1 0 On Site Principal level of water storage and may support water supply/river base flow on a strategic scale. Generally principal aquifers were previously major aquifers Geology of high intergranular and/or fracture permeability, usually providing a high 2 317 S Principal level of water storage and may support water supply/river base flow on a strategic scale. Generally principal aquifers were previously major aquifers

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 30 6.3 Groundwater Abstraction Licences

Groundwater Abstraction Licences within 2000m of the study site Identified

The following Abstraction Licences records are represented as points, lines and regions on the Aquifer within Bedrock Geology Map (6b):

Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Annual Volume (m³): - Status: Historical Max Daily Volume (m³): - Licence No: 7/34/07/*G/0037 Original Application No: - Details: General Farming & Domestic 619270 Original Start Date: 1/5/1967 5 432 S Direct Source: Ground Water Source Of Supply 314900 Expiry Date: - Point: Bore At Homestead Kennels Issue No: 100 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 1/4/1985 Name: KEELY Version End Date: Annual Volume (m³): 140000 Status: Historical Max Daily Volume (m³): 3000 Licence No: 7/34/07/*G/0066A Original Application No: EN2202 Details: Spray Irrigation - Direct 618810 Original Start Date: 2/5/2007 6A 576 W Direct Source: Ground Water Source Of Supply 315420 Expiry Date: 30/9/2008 Point: Borehole At Horsford Issue No: 1 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 2/5/2007 Name: DRAYTON FARMS LTD Version End Date: Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): 140000 Licence No: 7/34/07/*G/0066B Max Daily Volume (m³): 3000 Details: Transfer Between Sources (Post Water Original Application No: EN2433 618810 Act 2003) Original Start Date: 1/10/2008 7A 576 W 315420 Direct Source: Ground Water Source Of Supply Expiry Date: 31/3/2010 Point: Borehole At Horsford Issue No: 1 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 1/10/2008 Name: DRAYTON FARMS LTD Version End Date: Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): 200000 Licence No: 7/34/07/*G/0066 Max Daily Volume (m³): 3000 Details: Transfer between Sources (Pre Water Original Application No: EN1754 618810 Act 2003) Original Start Date: 4/2/2003 8A 576 W 315420 Direct Source: Ground Water Source Of Supply Expiry Date: 30/9/2006 Point: Borehole At Horsford Issue No: 1 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 4/2/2003 Name: DRAYTON FARMS LTD Version End Date: Annual Volume (m³): 140000 Status: Historical Max Daily Volume (m³): 3000 Licence No: 7/34/07/*G/0066B Original Application No: EN2433 Details: Spray Irrigation - Direct 618810 Original Start Date: 1/10/2008 9A 576 W Direct Source: Ground Water Source Of Supply 315420 Expiry Date: 31/3/2010 Point: Borehole At Horsford Issue No: 1 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 1/10/2008 Name: DRAYTON FARMS LTD Version End Date: Annual Volume (m³): - Status: Historical Max Daily Volume (m³): - Licence No: 7/34/07/*G/0059 Original Application No: - Details: Spray Irrigation - Direct 618810 Original Start Date: 1/2/1997 10A 576 W Direct Source: Ground Water Source Of Supply 315420 Expiry Date: 30/09/2002 Point: Borehole At Horsford Issue No: 100 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 24/2/1997 Name: DRAYTON FARMS LTD Version End Date:

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 31 Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Annual Volume (m³): 200000 Status: Historical Max Daily Volume (m³): 3000 Licence No: 7/34/07/*G/0066 Original Application No: EN1754 Details: Spray Irrigation - Direct 618810 Original Start Date: 4/2/2003 11A 576 W Direct Source: Ground Water Source Of Supply 315420 Expiry Date: 30/9/2006 Point: Borehole At Horsford Issue No: 1 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 4/2/2003 Name: DRAYTON FARMS LTD Version End Date: Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): 140000 Licence No: 7/34/07/*G/0066A Max Daily Volume (m³): 3000 Details: Transfer Between Sources (Pre Water Original Application No: EN2202 618810 Act 2003) Original Start Date: 2/5/2007 12A 576 W 315420 Direct Source: Ground Water Source Of Supply Expiry Date: 30/9/2008 Point: Borehole At Horsford Issue No: 1 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 2/5/2007 Name: DRAYTON FARMS LTD Version End Date: Status: Active Annual Volume (m³): 140000 Licence No: AN/034/0007/005 Max Daily Volume (m³): 3000 Details: Transfer Between Sources (Post Water Original Application No: NPS/WR/002915 618810 Act 2003) Original Start Date: 7/6/2010 13A 576 W 315420 Direct Source: Ground Water Source Of Supply Expiry Date: 31/3/2018 Point: Borehole At Horsford Issue No: 1 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 7/6/2010 Name: DRAYTON FARMS LTD Version End Date: Annual Volume (m³): 140000 Status: Active Max Daily Volume (m³): 3000 Licence No: AN/034/0007/005 Original Application No: NPS/WR/002915 Details: Spray Irrigation - Direct 618810 Original Start Date: 7/6/2010 14A 576 W Direct Source: Ground Water Source Of Supply 315420 Expiry Date: 31/3/2018 Point: Borehole At Horsford Issue No: 1 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 7/6/2010 Name: DRAYTON FARMS LTD Version End Date: Annual Volume (m³): - Status: Historical Max Daily Volume (m³): - Licence No: 7/34/07/*G/0060 Original Application No: - Details: General Farming & Domestic 620080 Original Start Date: 1/4/1998 15 661 E Direct Source: Ground Water Source Of Supply 315380 Expiry Date: - Point: Borehole, Hilltop Fm, Horsford Issue No: 100 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 1/4/1998 Name: A R BROOKS & SONS Version End Date: Annual Volume (m³): - Status: Historical Max Daily Volume (m³): - Licence No: 7/34/07/*G/0025 Original Application No: - Not Details: General Farming & Domestic 619440 Original Start Date: 1/12/1966 show 672 N Direct Source: Ground Water Source Of Supply 316000 Expiry Date: - n Point: Bore At Lodge Farm Horsford Issue No: 100 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 1/12/1966 Name: BROOKS Version End Date: Annual Volume (m³): 50000 Status: Active Max Daily Volume (m³): 1250 Licence No: 7/34/07/*G/0026 Original Application No: NPS/WR/015285 Not Details: Spray Irrigation - Direct 619440 Original Start Date: 1/12/1966 show 672 N Direct Source: Ground Water Source Of Supply 316000 Expiry Date: - n Point: Bore At Lodge Farm Horsford Issue No: 102 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 11/2/2014 Name: The Horsford Estate Version End Date: Annual Volume (m³): 7600 Status: Active Max Daily Volume (m³): 700 Licence No: 7/34/07/*G/0049 Original Application No: - Details: Spray Irrigation - Direct 619900 Original Start Date: 1/8/1979 18 672 NE Direct Source: Ground Water Source Of Supply 315800 Expiry Date: - Point: Seepage Reservoir,horsford Issue No: 100 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 1/8/1979 Name: BARRETT Version End Date:

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 32 Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Annual Volume (m³): 50000 Status: Historical Max Daily Volume (m³): 1250 Licence No: 7/34/07/*G/0026 Original Application No: ES2488 Not Details: Spray Irrigation - Direct 619490 Original Start Date: 1/12/1966 show 675 N Direct Source: Ground Water Source Of Supply 316000 Expiry Date: - n Point: Bore-lodge Farm Horsford Issue No: 101 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 1/10/2002 Name: WALLER-BARRETT Version End Date: Annual Volume (m³): 69400 Status: Historical Max Daily Volume (m³): 737 Licence No: 7/34/11/*G/0560 Original Application No: - Not Details: Spray Irrigation - Direct 619280 Original Start Date: 1/5/1998 show 1062 S Direct Source: Ground Water Source Of Supply 314260 Expiry Date: 31/10/2007 n Point: Borehole At Horsford Issue No: 100 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 1/5/1998 Name: BARRETT Version End Date: Annual Volume (m³): 52300 Status: Active Max Daily Volume (m³): 737 Licence No: 7/34/11/*G/0560A Original Application No: EN2262 Not Details: Spray Irrigation - Direct 619280 Original Start Date: 28/12/2007 show 1062 S Direct Source: Ground Water Source Of Supply 314260 Expiry Date: 31/3/2018 n Point: Borehole At Horsford Issue No: 1 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 1/4/2008 Name: BARRETT Version End Date: Annual Volume (m³): - Status: Historical Max Daily Volume (m³): - Licence No: 7/34/07/*G/0024 Original Application No: - Not Details: General Farming & Domestic 619420 Original Start Date: 1/1/1967 show 1590 N Direct Source: Ground Water Source Of Supply 316920 Expiry Date: - n Point: Bore-mill Lane Farm Horsford Issue No: 100 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 1/6/1975 Name: BROOKS Version End Date:

6.4 Surface Water Abstraction Licences

Surface Water Abstraction Licences within 2000m of the study site Identified

The following Surface Water Abstraction Licences records are represented as points, lines and regions on the Aquifer within Bedrock Geology Map (6b):

Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Annual Volume (m³): - Status: Historical Max Daily Volume (m³): - Licence No: 7/34/07/*S/0063 Application No: - Details: Spray Irrigation - Direct Not 621040 Original Start Date: 1/11/1998 1638 E Direct Source: Surface Water Source Of Supply shown 315580 Expiry Date: 31/03/2018 Point: Horsford Beck,horsford Issue No: 100 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 1/11/1998 Name: POLLOCK Version End Date: Annual Volume (m³): - Status: Historical Max Daily Volume (m³): - Licence No: 7/34/07/*S/0063 Application No: - Details: Spray Irrigation - Storage Not 621040 Original Start Date: 1/11/1998 1638 E Direct Source: Surface Water Source Of Supply shown 315580 Expiry Date: 31/03/2018 Point: Horsford Beck, Horsford Issue No: 100 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 1/11/1998 Name: POLLOCK Version End Date:

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 33 6.5 Potable Water Abstraction Licences

Potable Water Abstraction Licences within 2000m of the study site None identified

Database searched and no data found.

6.6 Source Protection Zones

Source Protection Zones within 500m of the study site None identified

Database searched and no data found.

6.7 Source Protection Zones within Confined Aquifer

Source Protection Zones within the Confined Aquifer within 500m of the study site None identified

Historically, Source Protection Zone maps have been focused on regulation of activities which occur at or near the ground surface, such as prevention of point source pollution and bacterial contamination of water supplies. Sources in confined aquifers were often considered to be protected from these surface pressures due to the presence of a low permeability confining layer (e.g. glacial till, clay). The increased interest in subsurface activities such as onshore oil and gas exploration, ground source heating and cooling requires protection zones for confined sources to be marked on SPZ maps where this has not already been done.

Database searched and no data found.

6.8 Groundwater Vulnerability and Soil Leaching Potential

Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales information on groundwater vulnerability and soil leaching potential within 500m of the study site Identified

Distance Direction Classification Soil Vulnerability Category Description (m) Deep, permeable, coarse textured soils which readily transmit a wide Major Aquifer/High Leaching 0 On Site H2 range of pollutants because of their Potential rapid drainage and low attenuation potential. Soils in which pollutants are unlikely to penetrate the soil layer because Major Aquifer/Low Leaching 313 N L either water movement is largely Potential horizontal, or they have the ability to attenuate diffuse pollutants. Soils which can possibly transmit non Major Aquifer/Intermediate Leaching – or weakly adsorbed pollutants and 316 N I2 Potential liquid discharges but are unlikely to transmit adsorbed pollutants.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 34 6.9 River Quality

Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales information on river quality within 1500m of the study site None identified

6.9.1 Biological Quality:

Database searched and no data found.

6.9.2 Chemical Quality:

Database searched and no data found.

6.10 Ordnance Survey MasterMap Water Network

Ordnance Survey MasterMap Water Network entries within 500m of the study site

This watercourse information is provided by Ordnance Survey MasterMap Water Network. The data provides a detailed centre line following the curve of the waterway precisely, so all distances provided in the report should be understood as measurements to the centreline rather than a measurement to the nearest point of the watercourse. Underground watercourses are inferred from entry and exit points so caution is advised in using these to indicate precise locations of underground watercourses when planning site investigation and development.

The following Ordnance Survey MasterMap Water Network records are represented on the Hydrology Map (6e):

Distance/ ID Name Type of Watercourse Additional Details Direction Catchment Area: Bure 386 - Inland river not influenced Relationship to Ground Level: On ground surface 1 Alternative Name: - by normal tidal action. Permanence: Unclassified. E Average Width in Watercourse Section (m): Not Provided Catchment Area: Bure 386 Not - Inland river not influenced Relationship to Ground Level: On ground surface shown Alternative Name: - by normal tidal action. Permanence: Unclassified. E Average Width in Watercourse Section (m): Not Provided Catchment Area: Bure 420 - Inland river not influenced Relationship to Ground Level: On ground surface 2 Alternative Name: - by normal tidal action. Permanence: Unclassified. N Average Width in Watercourse Section (m): 2.3 Catchment Area: Bure 420 Not - Inland river not influenced Relationship to Ground Level: On ground surface shown Alternative Name: - by normal tidal action. Permanence: Unclassified. N Average Width in Watercourse Section (m): 2.3 Catchment Area: Bure 427 - Inland river not influenced Relationship to Ground Level: On ground surface 3 Alternative Name: - by normal tidal action. Permanence: Unclassified. N Average Width in Watercourse Section (m): 1.9 Not 427 - Inland river not influenced Catchment Area: Bure shown Alternative Name: - by normal tidal action. Relationship to Ground Level: On ground surface

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 35 Distance/ ID Name Type of Watercourse Additional Details Direction Permanence: Unclassified. N Average Width in Watercourse Section (m): 1.9 Catchment Area: Bure 457 - Inland river not influenced Relationship to Ground Level: On ground surface 4 Alternative Name: - by normal tidal action. Permanence: Unclassified. N Average Width in Watercourse Section (m): 2.4 Catchment Area: Bure 457 Not - Inland river not influenced Relationship to Ground Level: On ground surface shown Alternative Name: - by normal tidal action. Permanence: Unclassified. N Average Width in Watercourse Section (m): 2.4 Catchment Area: Bure 464 - Inland river not influenced Relationship to Ground Level: On ground surface 5 Alternative Name: - by normal tidal action. Permanence: Unclassified. N Average Width in Watercourse Section (m): 1.7 Catchment Area: Bure 464 Not - Inland river not influenced Relationship to Ground Level: On ground surface shown Alternative Name: - by normal tidal action. Permanence: Unclassified. N Average Width in Watercourse Section (m): 1.7 Catchment Area: Bure 482 - Inland river not influenced Relationship to Ground Level: Underground 6 Alternative Name: - by normal tidal action. Permanence: Unclassified. N Average Width in Watercourse Section (m): Not Provided Catchment Area: Bure 482 Not - Inland river not influenced Relationship to Ground Level: Underground shown Alternative Name: - by normal tidal action. Permanence: Unclassified. N Average Width in Watercourse Section (m): Not Provided Catchment Area: Bure 483 - Inland river not influenced Relationship to Ground Level: On ground surface 7 Alternative Name: - by normal tidal action. Permanence: Unclassified. N Average Width in Watercourse Section (m): 2.4 Catchment Area: Bure 483 Not - Inland river not influenced Relationship to Ground Level: On ground surface shown Alternative Name: - by normal tidal action. Permanence: Unclassified. N Average Width in Watercourse Section (m): 2.4 Catchment Area: Bure 489 - Inland river not influenced Relationship to Ground Level: On ground surface 8 Alternative Name: - by normal tidal action. Permanence: Unclassified. NE Average Width in Watercourse Section (m): 2.1 Catchment Area: Bure 489 Not - Inland river not influenced Relationship to Ground Level: On ground surface shown Alternative Name: - by normal tidal action. Permanence: Unclassified. NE Average Width in Watercourse Section (m): 2.1

6.11 Surface Water Features

Surface water features within 250m of the study site None identified

Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 36 7a. Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Flood Map for Planning (from rivers and the sea)

NW N NE

W E

SE SW S

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 37 7b. Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Risk of Flooding from Rivers and the Sea (RoFRaS) Map

NW N NE

W E

SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2018. Ordnance Survey licence 100035207.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 38 7 Flooding

7.1 River and Coastal Zone 2 Flooding

Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Zone 2 floodplain within 250m None identified

Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Zone 2 floodplains estimate the annual probability of flooding as between 1 in 1000 (0.1%) and 1 in 100 (1%) from rivers and between 1 in 1000 (0.1%) and 1 in 200 (0.5%) from the sea. Any relevant data is represented on Map 7a – Flood Map for Planning:

Database searched and no data found.

7.2 River and Coastal Zone 3 Flooding

Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Zone 3 floodplain within 250m None identified

Zone 3 shows the extent of a river flood with a 1 in 100 (1%) or greater chance of occurring in any year or a sea flood with a 1 in 200 (0.5%) or greater chance of occurring in any year. Any relevant data is represented on Map 7a – Flood Map for Planning.

Database searched and no data found.

7.3 Risk of Flooding from Rivers and the Sea (RoFRaS) Flood Rating

Highest risk of flooding onsite Very Low

The Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales RoFRaS database provides an indication of river and coastal flood risk at a national level on a 50m grid with the flood rating at the centre of the grid calculated and given above. The data considers the probability that the flood defences will overtop or breach by considering their location, type, condition and standard of protection.

RoFRaS data for the study site indicates the property is in an area with a Very Low (less than 1 in 1000) chance of flooding in any given year.

7.4 Flood Defences

Flood Defences within 250m of the study site None identified Database searched and no data found.

7.5 Areas benefiting from Flood Defences

Areas benefiting from Flood Defences within 250m of the study site None identified

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 39 7.6 Areas benefiting from Flood Storage

Areas used for Flood Storage within 250m of the study site None identified

7.7 Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Areas

7.7.1 British Geological Survey groundwater flooding susceptibility areas within 50m of the boundary of the study site Identified Clearwater Flooding or Superficial Deposits Flooding Clearwater Flooding

Notes: Groundwater flooding may either be associated with shallow unconsolidated sedimentary aquifers which overlie unproductive aquifers (Superficial Deposits Flooding), or with unconfined aquifers (Clearwater Flooding).

7.7.2 Highest susceptibility to groundwater flooding in the search area based on the underlying geological conditions

Limited potential Where limited potential for groundwater flooding to occur is indicated, this means that although given the geological conditions there may be a groundwater flooding hazard, unless other relevant information, e.g. records of previous flooding, suggests groundwater flooding has occurred before in this area, you need take no further action in relation to groundwater flooding hazard.

7.8 Groundwater Flooding Confidence Areas

British Geological Survey confidence rating in this result Low

Notes: Groundwater flooding is defined as the emergence of groundwater at the ground surface or the rising of groundwater into man-made ground under conditions where the normal range of groundwater levels is exceeded.

The confidence rating is on a threefold scale - Low, Moderate and High. This provides a relative indication of the BGS confidence in the accuracy of the susceptibility result for groundwater flooding. This is based on the amount and precision of the information used in the assessment. In areas with a relatively lower level of confidence the susceptibility result should be treated with more caution. In other areas with higher levels of confidence the susceptibility result can be used with more confidence.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 40 8. Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Map

NW N NE

W E

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 41 8. Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites

Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites within 2000m of the study site Identified

8.1 Records of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) within 2000m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

8.2 Records of National Nature Reserves (NNR) within 2000m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

8.3 Records of Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) within 2000m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

8.4 Records of Special Protection Areas (SPA) within 2000m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

8.5 Records of Ramsar sites within 2000m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 42 8.6 Records of Ancient Woodland within 2000m of the study site:

The following records of Designated Ancient Woodland provided by Natural England/Natural Resources Wales are represented as polygons on the Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Map:

Distance ID Direction Ancient Woodland Name Data Source (m) Not Ancient and Semi-Natural 1920 NE UNKNOWN shown Woodland Not 2000 NE UNKNOWN Ancient Replanted Woodland shown

8.7 Records of Local Nature Reserves (LNR) within 2000m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

8.8 Records of World Heritage Sites within 2000m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

8.9 Records of Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 2000m of the study site:

The following Environmentally Sensitive Area records produced by DEFRA are represented as polygons on the Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Map:

Distance ID Direction ESA Name Data Source (m) 5 346 N Broads Natural England 6 681 NE Broads Natural England

8.10 Records of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) within 2000m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 43 8.11 Records of National Parks (NP) within 2000m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

8.12 Records of Nitrate Sensitive Areas within 2000m of the study site:

Database searched and no data found.

8.13 Records of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones within 2000m of the study site:

The following Nitrate Vulnerable Zone records produced by DEFRA are represented as polygons on the Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Map:

Distance ID Direction NVZ Name Data Source (m)

1 0 On Site Existing DEFRA 2 0 On Site Existing DEFRA 3 579 E Existing DEFRA 4 579 E Existing DEFRA

8.14 Records of Green Belt land within 2000m of the study site:

0 Database searched and no data found.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 44 9. Natural Hazards Findings

9.1 Detailed BGS GeoSure Data

BGS GeoSure Data has been searched to 50m. The data is included in tabular format. If you require further information on geology and ground stability, please obtain a Groundsure Geo Insight, available from our website. The following information has been found:

9.1.1 Shrink Swell

Maximum Shrink-Swell** hazard rating identified on the study site Negligible

The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping:

Hazard Ground conditions predominantly non-plastic. No special actions required to avoid problems due to shrink-swell clays. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely likely due to potential problems with shrink-swell clays.

9.1.2 Landslides

Maximum Landslide* hazard rating identified on the study site Very Low

The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping:

Hazard Slope instability problems are unlikely to be present. No special actions required to avoid problems due to landslides. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with landslides.

9.1.3 Soluble Rocks

Maximum Soluble Rocks* hazard rating identified on the study site Negligible

The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping:

Hazard Soluble rocks are present, but unlikely to cause problems except under exceptional conditions. No special actions required to avoid problems due to soluble rocks. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with soluble rocks.

* This indicates an automatically generated 50m buffer and site.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 45 9.1.4 Compressible Ground

Maximum Compressible Ground* hazard rating identified on the study site Negligible

The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping:

Hazard No indicators for compressible deposits identified. No special actions required to avoid problems due to compressible deposits. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with compressible deposits.

9.1.5 Collapsible Rocks

Maximum Collapsible Rocks* hazard rating identified on the study site Very Low

The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping:

Hazard Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are unlikely to be present. No special ground investigation required or increased construction costs or increased financial risk due to potential problems with collapsible deposits.

9.1.6 Running Sand

Maximum Running Sand** hazard rating identified on the study site Very Low

The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping:

Hazard Very low potential for running sand problems if water table rises or if sandy strata are exposed to water. No special actions required, to avoid problems due to running sand. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with running sand.

* This indicates an automatically generated 50m buffer and site.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 46 9.2 Radon

9.2.1 Radon Affected Areas

Is the property in a Radon Affected Area as defined by the Health Protection Agency (HPA) and if so what percentage of homes are above the Action Level? The site is not in a Radon Affected Area, as less than 1% of properties are above the Action Level.

The radon data in this report is supplied by the BGS/Public Health England and is the definitive map of Radon Affected Areas in Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The dataset was created using long-term radon measurements in over 479,000 homes across Great Britain and 23,000 homes across Northern Ireland, combined with geological data. The dataset is considered accurate to 50m to allow for the margin of error in geological lines, and the findings of this report supercede any answer given in the less accurate Indicative Atlas of Radon in Great Britain, which simplifies the data to give the highest risk within any given 1km grid square. As such, the radon atlas is considered indicative, whereas the data given in this report is considered definitive.

9.2.2 Radon Protection

Is the property in an area where Radon Protection are required for new properties or extensions to existing ones as described in publication BR211 by the Building Research Establishment? No radon protective measures are necessary.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 47 10. Mining

10.1 Coal Mining

Coal mining areas within 75m of the study site None identified

Database searched and no data found.

10.2 Non-Coal Mining

Non-Coal Mining areas within 50m of the study site boundary None identified

Database searched and no data found.

10.3 Brine Affected Areas

Brine affected areas within 75m of the study site None identified Guidance: No Guidance Required.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 48 Contact Details

Groundsure Helpline Telephone: 08444 159 000 [email protected]

British Geological Survey Enquiries Kingsley Dunham Centre Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG Tel: 0115 936 3143. Fax: 0115 936 3276. Email: Web:www.bgs.ac.uk BGS Geological Hazards Reports and general geological enquiries: [email protected] Environment Agency National Customer Contact Centre, PO Box 544 Rotherham, S60 1BY Tel: 03708 506 506 Web: www.environment-agency.gov.uk Email: [email protected]

Public Health England Public information access office Public Health England, Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG www.gov.uk/phe Email:[email protected] Main switchboard: 020 7654 8000

The Coal Authority 200 Lichfield Lane Mansfield Notts NG18 4RG Tel: 0345 7626 848 DX 716176 Mansfield 5 www.coal.gov.uk

Ordnance Survey Adanac Drive, Southampton SO16 0AS Tel: 08456 050505

Local Authority Authority: Broadland District Council Phone: 01603 431133 Web: http://www.broadland.gov.uk/ Address: Thorpe Lodge, 1 Yarmouth Road, Thorpe St Andrew, Gemapping PLC Virginia Villas, High Street, Hartley Witney, Hampshire RG27 8NW Tel: 01252 845444

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 49 Acknowledgements: Site of Special Scientific Interest, National Nature Reserve, Ramsar Site, Special Protection Area, Special Area of Conservation data is provided by, and used with the permission of, Natural England/Natural Resources Wales who retain the Copyright and Intellectual Property Rights for the data. PointX © Database Right/Copyright, Thomson Directories Limited © Copyright Link Interchange Network Limited © Database Right/Copyright and Ordnance Survey © Crown Copyright and/or Database Right. All Rights Reserved. Licence Number [03421028]. This report has been prepared in accordance with the Groundsure Ltd standard Terms and Conditions of business for work of this nature.

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 50 Standard Terms and Conditions

Groundsure's Terms and Conditions can be viewed online at this link: https://www.groundsure.com/terms-and-conditions-may25-2018

Report Reference: GS-5295395 Client Reference: 18_288_BJH 51

APPENDIX C: TRIAL PIT RECORDS

Key

D Small disturbed sample

PID Photo-ionisation Detector (VOC screening test)

All depths and measurements are given in metres, except as noted

Strata descriptions compiled by visual examination of samples obtained after BS 5930:2015 and modified in accordance with laboratory test results where applicable

Excavation Method Dimensions Ground Level (mOD) Client Job L 0.4 m x W 0.3 m x D 0.8 m Number Hand dug trial pit Mr and Mrs Rudd 18.288

Location Dates Engineer Sheet 09/08/2018 Frith:Blake Consulting Limited 1/1

Depth Water Level Depth (m) Sample / Tests Depth Field Records (mOD) (m) Description Legend

(m) (Thickness) Water

0.00 D1 PID = 6.5 ppm MADE GROUND (Black mottled brown gravelly fine to (0.10) coarse sand. Gravel is subangular to subrounded fine to 0.05 D2 PID = 14.9 ppm coarse flint, brick and timber. Hydrocarbon staining at 0.10 surface and slight hydrocarbon odour) (0.05) 0.15 MADE GROUND (Timber blocks with a sandy matrix) MADE GROUND (Brown slightly silty gravelly fine to coarse 0.20 D3 PID = 0.2 ppm sand. Gravel is subangular to subrounded fine to medium brick, mortar, flint and chalk)

(0.65) 0.50 D4 PID = 0.0 ppm

0.80 Complete at 0.80m

Remarks

1. Location CAT scanned prior to excavation 2. No groundwater encountered 3. Trial pit remained open and sidewalls stable during excavation. 4. Trial pit backfilled with arisings upon completion.

Scale (approx) Logged By Figure No.

1:10 DJM 18.288.TP01 Copyright © A F Howland Associates Limited 2018 Produced by the GEOtechnical DAtabase SYstem (GEODASY) © all rights reserved Site Trial Pit Number The Lindens Barn, Drayton Lane, Horsford TP02

Excavation Method Dimensions Ground Level (mOD) Client Job L 0.35 m x W 0.2 m x D 0.7 m Number Hand dug trial pit Mr and Mrs Rudd 18.288

Location Dates Engineer Sheet 09/08/2018 Frith:Blake Consulting Limited 1/1

Depth Water Level Depth (m) Sample / Tests Depth Field Records (mOD) (m) Description Legend

(m) (Thickness) Water

(0.05) MADE GROUND (Brick flooring) 0.05 0.05 D1 PID = 0.0 ppm (0.05) MADE GROUND (White mottled brown sandy calcareous 0.10 subangular to subrounded fine to meidum brick and chalk 0.10 D2 PID = 0.0 ppm (0.05) gravel) 0.15 MADE GROUND (Dark orange brown sandy subangular to subrounded fine ot coarse brick, flint and chalk gravel) 0.20 D3 PID = 0.0 ppm MADE GROUND (Dark brwon slightly silty slightly gravelly fine to medium sand. Gravel is subangular to subrounded fine to coarse brick and flint)

(0.39)

0.54 Orange brown silty slightly gravelly fine to medium SAND. 0.55 D4 PID = 0.0 ppm Gravel is subangular to subrounded fine to medium flint (0.16)

0.70 Complete at 0.70m

Remarks

1. Location CAT scanned prior to excavation 2. No groundwater encountered 3. Trial pit remained open and sidewalls stable during excavation. 4. Trial pit backfilled with arisings upon completion.

Scale (approx) Logged By Figure No.

APPENDIX D: DRAWINGS

Drawing 18.288/PhaseI/01 Site Location Plan

Drawing 18.288/PhaseI/02 Relevant Feature Plan

Drawing 1092/(-)03A Plan and Elevations & Section as Proposed (William Glover Architectural Technologist, dated April 2018)

North Circle indicates approximate location of site

Site: The Lindens Barn, Drayton Lane, Horsford, NR10 3AN

SITE LOCATION PLAN

Scale 1: 50,000 @ A4 Client : Marcus and Margaret Rudd Reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown Copyright Licence No. AL 100002157 Copyright © A F Howland Associates Limited 2018 Date : August 2018 Dwg : 18.288/PhaseI/01 Drawing 18.288/PhaseI/02 Relevant Feature Plan

Photo 6 –Looking east towards the barn Photo 5 – Looking north towards the barn access Photo 4 – Looking south within the barn Photo 3 – Looking north within the barn Photo 2– Gas oil tank in barn

Photo 7 – Looking across the courtyard garden Photo 1 – Location of trial pits

Photo 11 Photo 12

Photo 7 Photo 4 Photo 9 &10

Photo 8 –Looking towards western part of the site Key Photo 2

Approximate trial pit location and reference

TP01

Approximate above ground gas oil storage tank (within barn) TP02

Photo 1 & 3

Photo 8 Photo 6 Photo 5 Base Map: Drawing 1092/(S)02 – Site Plan as Existing (dated March 2018; William Glover Architectural Technologist) Photo 9 – Garage with domestic storage Photo 10 – Enclosed wood store Photo 11 – Compost head and wood store area Photo 12 – Northern boundary from adjacent garden A F Howland Associates Ltd. The Old Exchange Newmarket Road Cringleford Norwich NR4 6UF Tel: 01603 250754 Website: www.howland.co.uk Email: [email protected] Client: Mr & Mrs Rudd Site: The Lindens Barn, Drayton Lane, Horsford Job No.: 18.288 Drawing title: Relevant Feature Plan Drawing No.: 18.288/PhaseI/02 Date: 24 August 2018

APPENDIX E: RISK ASSESSMENT CLASSIFICATION

Classification Definition Examples

High Likelihood There is a pollution linkage and an event which Free product visible on surface of sensitive water body would either appear very likely in the short term or in the soil. and almost inevitable over the long term, or, there On site or adjacent gassing ‘landfill site’. is evidence at the receptor of harm or pollution.

Likely There is a pollution linkage and all the elements Potentially contaminative land use i.e. ‘Brownfield’ are present and in the right place which means site, fuel storage depot, factory, petrol station etc. that it is probable that an event will occur. Sensitive receptors to be introduced as part of site Circumstances are such that an event is not redevelopment. Potentially infilled land identified on inevitable, but possible in the short term and likely site or off-site with credible migration pathway. over the long term.

Low Likelihood There is a pollution linkage and circumstances are Potential source of contamination identified i.e. possible under which an event could occur. historical land use as allotments or domestic above ground fuel storage tanks, areas of burning garden However, it is by no means certain that even over waste. Possible off-site infilled land. a longer period such event would take place, and is less likely in the shorter term.

Unlikely There is a pollution linkage but circumstances are No significant potential sources of contamination such that it is improbable that an event would identified e.g. ‘Greenfield’ site. No potential sources of occur even in the very long term. ground gas. TABLE E1: CLASSIFICATION OF PROBABILITY

Classification Definition Examples

Severe Short term (acute) risk to human health. Short High concentrations of cyanide on the surface of an term risk of pollution of sensitive water resource. informal recreation area. Catastrophic damage to buildings/property. A Major spillage of contaminants from site into short term risk to a particular ecosystem. controlled water. Credible source of ground gas.

Medium Chronic damage to Human Health. Concentrations of a contaminant from site exceeds the Pollution of sensitive water resources. generic, or site specific assessment criteria. Leaching of contaminants from a site to a Secondary or A significant change in a particular ecosystem, or Principal aquifer. organism forming part of such ecosystem.

Mild Pollution of non-sensitive water resources. Concentrations of a contaminant do not exceed the Significant damage to buildings/structures and generic, or site specific assessment criteria. crops (“significant harm” as defined in the Circular Pollution of non-classified groundwater. on Contaminated Land, DETR, 2000). Damage to Damage to building rendering it unsafe to occupy (e.g. sensitive buildings/structures or the environment. foundation damage resulting in instability).

Minor Harm, although not necessarily significant harm, The presence of contaminants at such concentrations which may result in a financial loss, or expenditure that protective equipment is required during site to resolve. Non-permanent health effects to works. human health (easily prevented by means such as The loss of plants in a landscaping scheme. Personal Protective Equipment, etc). TABLE E2: CLASSIFICATION OF CONSEQUENCE

Classification Definition

Very High Risk There is a high probability that severe harm could arise to a designated receptor from an identified hazard or there is evidence that severe harm is occurring. The risk, if realised, is likely to result in a substantial liability. Urgent investigation and remediation will be required. High Risk Harm or chronic damage is likely to arise to a designated receptor from an identified hazard. Investigation is required and remediation is likely to be required to ensure the site is suitable for a proposed use. Moderate Risk It is possible that harm or chronic damage could arise to a designated receptor from an identified hazard. However, it is relatively unlikely that any such harm would be severe. Investigation and remediation are likely to be required to ensure the site is suitable for a proposed use. Low/Moderate Risk It is possible that harm or chronic damage could arise to a designated receptor from an identified hazard. Investigation is likely to be required. However, circumstances are such that investigation may prove the consequence to be mild and the site suitable for use without remediation. Low Risk It is possible that harm could arise to a designated receptor from an identified hazard but it is likely that this harm, if realised, would at worst be mild. Investigation is unlikely to be required. Very Low Risk There is a low possibility that harm could arise to a receptor. In the event of such harm being realised it is not likely to be severe. Investigation is not required. TABLE E3: DESCRIPTION OF RISK

CONSEQUENCE

Severe Medium Mild Minor

High likelihood Very High High Moderate Low/Moderate

Likely High Moderate Low/Moderate Low

Low likelihood Moderate Low/Moderate Low Very Low

PROBABILITY Unlikely Low/Moderate Low Very Low Very Low

TABLE E4: DETERMINATION OF RISK

The Old Exchange Newmarket Road Cringleford Norwich NR4 6UF

Tel: 01603 250754 Fax: 01603 250749 Email: [email protected] www: http://www.howland.co.uk