Describing and Estimating the System of Visitor Distribution

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Describing and Estimating the System of Visitor Distribution MODELING DAY-HIKING IN THE TRANSITION TRAIL ZONE OF MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK MARK E. VANDE KAMP Technical Report NPS/PWR/UW/NRTR-2009—01 NPS 105/100443 October 2009 PROTECTED AREA SOCIAL RESEARCH UNIT SCHOOL OF FOREST RESOURCES BOX 352100 UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98195-2100 The Protected Areas Social Research Unit is the applied social science program associated with the NPS Pacific Northwest Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (NPS PNW CESU). This applied social science program has operated out of the University of Washington (UW) College of Forest Resources since 1970 when it was a part of the Cooperative Park Studies Unit (CPSU). With the establishment of the UW College of the Environment in 2009, the UW College of Forest Resources became the UW School of Forest Resources within the College of the Environment and PASRU is operating out of the UW School of Forest Resources. The NPS (NPS PNW CESU) is located in the UW School of Forest Resources. The NPS PNW CESU is part of a larger partnership involving 7 federal agencies, 12 universities and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. The PNW CESU was created in October of 2000 to provide research, technical assistance and education to enhance management of natural and cultural resources on public lands in the Pacific Northwest. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by NPS, UW, or any of the other agencies or institutions associated with this research. The contents of the report do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the NPS, UW, or any of the agencies associated with this report. Copies are available from the following: Technical Information Center Denver Service Center National Park Service P. O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 303-969-2130 MODELING DAY-HIKING IN THE TRANSITION TRAIL ZONE OF MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK MARK E. VANDE KAMP Technical Report NPS/PWR/UW/NRTR-2009—01 NPS 105/100443 PROTECTED AREA SOCIAL RESEARCH UNIT SCHOOL OF FOREST RESOURCES BOX 352100 UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98195-2100 October 2009 Produced in partial fulfillment of: Task Agreement J9W88030023 by and between the National Park Service and the University of Washington written against the Pacific Northwest Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit Cooperative and Joint Venture Agreement CA9088A0008 entitled "Selecting Visitor Carrying Capacity Indicators and Proposing Potential Standards for Mount Rainier National Park." TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................ VI 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 The Visitor Experience and Resource Protection (VERP) Framework ............................................................ 1 1.1.1 The Transition Trail Zone in the VERP Framework and in This Document ................................................... 1 1.2 Computer Simulation Models of Visitor Use ....................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Stochastic, Itinerary-Based Simulation Using the RBSim Computer Program ............................................... 2 1.3 The Structure of this Document ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1 Description of Visitor Use ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2 Entry Distributions .......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.3 Pauses/Stops .................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.4 Assumptions and Simplifications ..................................................................................................................... 5 1.3.5 Validation ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.3.6 Simulation Results............................................................................................................................................ 5 2. SIMULATING THE WONDERLAND TRAIL TO SUMMERLAND ............................... 6 2.1 Description of Visitor Use: Wonderland Trail to Summerland ......................................................................... 6 2.2 Entry Distribution: Wonderland Trail to Summerland ..................................................................................... 7 2.3 Pauses/Stops: Wonderland Trail to Summerland ............................................................................................. 10 2.4 Hiking Speeds: Wonderland Trail to Summerland .......................................................................................... 12 2.5 Assumptions, Simplifications, and Limitations: Wonderland Trail to Summerland ..................................... 13 2.6 Validation: Wonderland Trail to Summerland ................................................................................................. 14 2.7 Simulation Results: Wonderland Trail to Summerland ................................................................................... 16 2.7.1 Trail Encounters on a 95th Percentile Day .................................................................................................... 16 2.7.2 Trail Encounters on an Average Weekend Day ............................................................................................. 18 2.7.3 Trail Encounters on an Average Weekday ..................................................................................................... 20 2.7.4 Trail Encounters and Use Levels ................................................................................................................... 22 2.7.5 Encounters per Hour on Distal Trail Segments ............................................................................................. 23 3. SIMULATING THE COMET FALLS TRAIL .............................................................. 24 3.1 Description of Visitor Use: Comet Falls Trail ................................................................................................... 24 3.2 Entry Distribution: Comet Falls Trail ............................................................................................................... 25 3.3 Pauses/Stops: Comet Falls Trail ......................................................................................................................... 29 3.4 Hiking Speeds: Comet Falls Trail....................................................................................................................... 30 3.5 Assumptions, Simplifications, and Limitations: Comet Falls Trail ................................................................. 31 3.6 Validation: Comet Falls Trail ............................................................................................................................. 32 3.7 Simulation Results: Comet Falls Trail ............................................................................................................... 36 3.7.1 Trail Encounters on a 95th Percentile Day .................................................................................................... 36 3.7.2 Trail Encounters on an Average Weekend Day ............................................................................................. 38 3.7.3 Trail Encounters on an Average Weekday ..................................................................................................... 40 3.7.4 Trail Encounters and Use Levels ................................................................................................................... 42 3.7.5 Encounters per Hour on Distal Trail Segments ............................................................................................. 43 3.7.6 Parties at One Time at Comet Falls ............................................................................................................... 43 4. SIMULATING THE SPRAY PARK TRAIL ................................................................ 45 4.1 Description of Visitor Use: Spray Park Trail .................................................................................................... 45 4.2 Entry Distribution: Spray Park Trail ................................................................................................................ 46 4.3 Pauses/Stops: Spray Park Trail .......................................................................................................................... 49 4.4 Hiking Speeds: Spray Park Trail ....................................................................................................................... 51 4.5 Assumptions, Simplifications, and Limitations: Spray Park Trail .................................................................. 52 4.6 Validation: Spray Park Trail .............................................................................................................................. 53 4.7 Simulation Results: Spray Park Trail ................................................................................................................ 56 4.7.1 Trail Encounters on
Recommended publications
  • Itinerary: Mt. Rainier Loop
    Itinerary: Mt. Rainier Loop Length: 78 miles Time to Allow: 4-5 hours Open Season: The route is usually snow-free by mid-June and remains open through late October. The road closes each year due to winter snowfall from November to early June. Driving Directions: From Packwood, travel northwest on Forest Road (FR) 52, also called Skate Creek Road, 23 miles to State Route (SR) 706. Turn right on SR 706 and travel east 41.9 miles into Mount Rainier National Park to SR 123. Turn right on SR 123 and travel south 5.4 miles to US Highway 12. Turn right on US Highway 12 and travel 7.3 miles west back to Packwood. Experience the grandeur of Mount Rainier, old-growth temperate rainforest, waterfalls, and impressive vistas! An excellent introduction to Mount Rainier National Park. Start: Begin this mountain adventure in the rural mountain community of Packwood located on Highway 12. Restaurants, car services, lodging, and campgrounds are available. Stop 1: Skate Creek Nestled deep in the forest, watch bubbling Skate Creek as you drive its namesake road. Along this winding, paved, but primitive road, see countless waterfalls cascade along the roadside. See blankets of drooping mosses and experience the beauty and serenity of this little gem. Memorable fall color displays have earned this road the honor of “Best Sunday Drive in Lewis County for Fall Color”. In the wintertime, this road is closed to vehicle traffic and the Skate Creek Sno-Park becomes a popular destination for the snowmobiling crowds. Stop 2: Nisqually Entrance Welcoming visitors to Mount Rainier National Park at the Nisqually Entrance stands a wooden entrance arch built in 1922 and reconstructed in 1973.
    [Show full text]
  • Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities
    Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities Alaska Aialik Bay Alaska Highway Alcan Highway Anchorage Arctic Auk Lake Cape Prince of Wales Castle Rock Chilkoot Pass Columbia Glacier Cook Inlet Copper River Cordova Curry Dawson Denali Denali National Park Eagle Fairbanks Five Finger Rapids Gastineau Channel Glacier Bay Glenn Highway Haines Harding Gateway Homer Hoonah Hurricane Gulch Inland Passage Inside Passage Isabel Pass Juneau Katmai National Monument Kenai Kenai Lake Kenai Peninsula Kenai River Kechikan Ketchikan Creek Kodiak Kodiak Island Kotzebue Lake Atlin Lake Bennett Latouche Lynn Canal Matanuska Valley McKinley Park Mendenhall Glacier Miles Canyon Montgomery Mount Blackburn Mount Dewey Mount McKinley Mount McKinley Park Mount O’Neal Mount Sanford Muir Glacier Nome North Slope Noyes Island Nushagak Opelika Palmer Petersburg Pribilof Island Resurrection Bay Richardson Highway Rocy Point St. Michael Sawtooth Mountain Sentinal Island Seward Sitka Sitka National Park Skagway Southeastern Alaska Stikine Rier Sulzer Summit Swift Current Taku Glacier Taku Inlet Taku Lodge Tanana Tanana River Tok Tunnel Mountain Valdez White Pass Whitehorse Wrangell Wrangell Narrow Yukon Yukon River General Views—no specific location Alabama Albany Albertville Alexander City Andalusia Anniston Ashford Athens Attalla Auburn Batesville Bessemer Birmingham Blue Lake Blue Springs Boaz Bobler’s Creek Boyles Brewton Bridgeport Camden Camp Hill Camp Rucker Carbon Hill Castleberry Centerville Centre Chapman Chattahoochee Valley Cheaha State Park Choctaw County
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Rainier National Park, Washington
    NATIONAL PARK . WASHINGTON MOUNT RAINIER WASHINGTON CONTENTS "The Mountain" 1 Wealth of Gorgeous Flowers 3 The Forests 5 How To Reach the Park 8 By Automobile 8 By Railroad and Bus 11 By Airplane 11 Administration 11 Free Public Campgrounds 11 Post Offices 12 Communication and Express Service 12 Medical Service 12 Gasoline Service 12 What To Wear 12 Trails 13 Fishing 13 Mount Rainier Summit Climb 13 Accommodations and Expenses 15 Summer Season 18 Winter Season 18 Ohanapecosh Hot Springs 20 Horseback Trips and Guide Service 20 Transportation 21 Tables of Distances 23 Principal Points of Interest 28 References 32 Rules and Regulations 33 Events of Historical Importance 34 Government Publications 35 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR • Harold L. Ickes, Secretary NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Arno B. Cammerer, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE • 1938 AN ALL-YEAR PARK Museums.—The park museum, headquarters for educational activities, MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK may be fully enjoyed throughout the and office of the park naturalist are located in the museum building at year. The summer season extends from early June to early November; the Longmire. Natural history displays and wild flower exhibits are main­ winter ski season, from late November well into May. All-year roads make tained at Paradise Community House, Yakima Park Blockhouse, and the park always accessible. Longmire Museum. Nisquaiiy Road is open to Paradise Valley throughout the year. During Hikes from Longmire.—Free hikes, requiring 1 day for the round trip the winter months this road is open to general traffic to Narada Falls, 1.5 are conducted by ranger naturalists from the museum to Van Trump Park, miles by trail from Paradise Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnificent Mt. Rainier
    RV Traveler's Roadmap to Mt. Rainer Ascending to 14,410 feet above sea level, Mount Rainier stands as an icon in the Washington landscape. An active volcano, Mount Rainier is the most glaciated peak in the contiguous U.S.A., spawning six major rivers. Sub alpine wildflower meadows ring the icy volcano while ancient forest cloaks Mount Rainier’s lower slopes. Wildlife abounds in the park’s ecosystems. A lifetime of discovery awaits. 1 Highlights & Facts For The Ideal Experience Mt. Rainier National Park Trip Length: Roughly 220 miles Visitors Centers: Longmire, Paradise, Ohanapecosh, Sunrise Best Time To Go: Summer for wildflowers, early fall for foliage and less visitors. Parks roads are closed from November - April except Nisqually/Paradise Supply Location: Longmire 2 Traveler's Notes Lake Mayfield, WA. Roughly an hours drive from Mt. Rainier Year-round access to the park is via SR 706 to the Nisqually Entrance in the southwest corner of the park. The road from the entrance to Longmire remains open throughout winter except during extreme weather. The highly visible Columbian black-tailed deer, Douglas squirrels, noisy Stellar's jays and common ravens are animals that many people remember. The most diverse and abundant animals in the park, however, are the invertebrates - the insects, worms, crustaceans, spiders- to name a few - that occupy all environments to the top of Columbia Crest itself. Every summer thousands of hikers and backpackers travel to Mount Rainier National Park to make a trip along the Wonderland Trail, seeking the same scenic splendors and thrilling adventures that Superintendent Roger Toll described above.
    [Show full text]
  • Glisan, Rodney L. Collection
    Glisan, Rodney L. Collection Object ID VM1993.001.003 Scope & Content Series 3: The Outing Committee of the Multnomah Athletic Club sponsored hiking and climbing trips for its members. Rodney Glisan participated as a leader on some of these events. As many as 30 people participated on these hikes. They usually travelled by train to the vicinity of the trailhead, and then took motor coaches or private cars for the remainder of the way. Of the four hikes that are recorded Mount Saint Helens was the first climb undertaken by the Club. On the Beacon Rock hike Lower Hardy Falls on the nearby Hamilton Mountain trail were rechristened Rodney Falls in honor of the "mountaineer" Rodney Glisan. Trips included Mount Saint Helens Climb, July 4 and 5, 1915; Table Mountain Hike, November 14, 1915; Mount Adams Climb, July 1, 1916; and Beacon Rock Hike, November 4, 1917. Date 1915; 1916; 1917 People Allen, Art Blakney, Clem E. English, Nelson Evans, Bill Glisan, Rodney L. Griffin, Margaret Grilley, A.M. Jones, Frank I. Jones, Tom Klepper, Milton Reed Lee, John A. McNeil, Fred Hutchison Newell, Ben W. Ormandy, Jim Sammons, Edward C. Smedley, Georgian E. Stadter, Fred W. Thatcher, Guy Treichel, Chester Wolbers, Harry L. Subjects Adams, Mount (Wash.) Bird Creek Meadows Castle Rock (Wash.) Climbs--Mazamas--Saint Helens, Mount Eyrie Hell Roaring Canyon Mount Saint Helens--Photographs Multnomah Amatuer Athletic Association Spirit Lake (Wash.) Table Mountain--Columbia River Gorge (Wash.) Trout Lake (Wash.) Creator Glisan, Rodney L. Container List 07 05 Mt. St. Helens Climb, July 4-5,1915 News clipping.
    [Show full text]
  • The Road to Paradise Tour
    Road to Paradise Experience the grandeur of Mount Rainier. Witness old-growth temperate rainforests, waterfalls, and impressive vistas. Whether you venture and sightsee by car, or choose to get outdoors and enjoy the many stops along the way, it's all pure Rainier. An excellent introduction to the beauty, majesty and mystique of Mt. Rainier National Park. Length: 83 miles | Driving Time: 2 1/2 hours (allow extra time for stops) Open Season: The entire loop is usually drivable and snow-free by mid-June and remains open through late October. The road between Ashford and Paradise remains open year-round. Driving Directions: From Ashford, travel east on State Route (SR) 706, six miles to the entrance of Mt. Rainier National Park. Continue into the park on Paradise Road and travel 17 miles to Paradise where the road becomes Paradise Valley Road. Travel 2.6 miles on Paradise Valley Road to Stevens Canyon Road. Turn left on Stevens Canyon Road and travel south 18.8 miles to Highway 123, Cayuse Pass. Turn right on Highway 123 and travel 5.5 miles to US Highway 12. Turn right on Highway 12 and travel 7.3 miles to Skate Creek Rd. Turn right on Skate Creek Rd. and travel 23 miles to SR 706. Turn left on SR 706 and travel 2.4 miles to Ashford. 2010 Visit Rainier | [email protected] | www.VisitRainier.com Road to Paradise Start: Ashford Begin this mountain adventure in the mountain community of Ashford located on State Route 706. A basecamp for recreation at Mt. Rainier, restaurants, car services, lodging, and campgrounds are available.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Rainier National Park, Washington
    MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK \ //c^^^ Mount Rainier NATIONAL PARK WASHINGTON Medical Service 18 OPEN ALL YEAR Gasoline Service 18 What To Wear 18 Contents Trails 18 "The Mountain" 6 Fishing 20 Wealth of Gorgeous Flowers 8 Mount Rainier Summit Climb 20 The Forests 10 Accommodations and Expenses .... 21 How To Reach the Park 12 Ohanapecosh Hot Springs 23 Administration 14 Horseback Trips and Guide Service ... 24 Free Public Campgrounds 15 Transportation 24 Post Offices 18 Principal Points of Interest 26 Communication and Express Service ... 18 References 30 Events OF HISTORICAL IMPORTANCE I792 May 8. Capt. George Vancouver, of the Royal British Navy, first white 1899 March 2. Mount Rainier National Park established by act of Congress. man to record sight of "The Mountain"; named it Mount Rainier in honor of his friend Admiral Peter Rainier. I909 Regular (horse-drawn) stage service was started between Ashford and Longmire. I°33 September 2. Dr. William Eraser Tolmie entered northwest corner of what is now the park. First white man to penetrate this region. 1911 October 8. President Taft visited the park. I057 July 16- Lt. A. V. Kautz, of the United States Army, and four companions I9I3 Government surveyors of the United States Geological Survey established made first attempt to scale Mount Rainier but did not reach summit. the elevation of Mount Rainier as 14,408 feet above sea level. 1870 August 17. Hazard Stevens and P. B. Van Trump, of Olympia, Wash., 1 made the first successful ascent of Mount Rainier via Gibraltar route. J93 March 24. Mather Memorial Parkway established.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Rainier National Park
    Mount Rainier National Park I a o a ~~~~~-i~~~~~Activit)' and Progran1 Guide April 11-June30, 1994 The Ohanapecosh River flows from an inactive glacier and snowfield, its clear water reflecting only the green of the forest and the blue of the sky. A mile up stream from the campground, the river cascades over beautiful Silver Falls. elcome to the mountain realms Sunrise of dense old-growth forests, Sunrise, situated at 6,400 feet in the W dazzling wildflowers, tremen­ northeastern part of the park, is a place of dous snowfields and rugged glaciers. breathtaking vistas and the intriguing Towering above all this scenic display is beauty of fragile subalpine vegetation. the volcanic cone of Mount Rainier. The The road to Sunrise usually opens in early mountain is a volcano built up by repeated July, but may be open as early as June 25 eruptions and successive flows of lava. this year, weather permitting. Even as volcanic forces were building up this land, the inevitable power of glacial White River ice was scouring it down. An early name for this mountain was "Tahoma", given to The White River Campground is the it by native peoples who revered the starting point of summit climbs using mountain as a special place to be treated Camp Schurman and routes up the Em­ with respect. Enjoy a long look at this mons Glacier. You can connect with mountain and explore the realms of many trails here that lead into the wilder­ Tahoma. ness, including the Wonderland Trail. The Hiker Information Center at the White Longmire River Ranger Station contains exhibits on between Mount Rainier's old-growth photographs, really are gone - they melted backcountry destinations and minimum In 1883, while on a climbing trip to forest and the ice-capped peak itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Features and Processes
    Mount Rainier National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Geologic Features and Processes This section provides descriptions of the most prominent and distinctive geologic features and processes in Mount Rainier National Park. At present, the Cascade Province contains four The extreme height and massive character of the national parks and one volcanic monument: Mount volcano allows it to intercept moisture- laden westerly Rainier National Park (WA), North Cascades National winds from the Pacific and to receive abundant Park (WA), Crater Lake National Park (OR), Lassen snowfall that helps maintain glacial cover. For Volcanic National Park (CA) and Mount St. Helens example, during the winter of 1971- 1972, slightly Volcanic Monument (WA), managed by the U.S. more than 102 feet (31 m) of snow fell on the Forest Service. These parks, as well as other mountain, setting a world’s record at an official Cascade Mountain areas, contain world- class weather station (Kiver and Harris, 1999). Since the examples of volcanic and glacial features. The mid- 1800s, however, the glaciers have lost as much geologic features and processes in MORA are divided as 35 percent of their surface area. This trend is into the following sections: synchronous with glacier retreat recorded elsewhere around the world and reflects global warming trends Glacial Features and Glacier Processes from natural perturbations and human influences. Volcanic Features From 1900 to 1960, the Nisqually Glacier retreated Thermal Features and Ice Caves about 1 mile (1.6 km) upstream from the old highway Glacial Features and Glacier Processes bridge (Kiver and Harris, 1999). Paradise Ice Caves, once a major attraction for visitors, collapsed in the Glaciers are highly effective erosional agents, shaping fall of 1991 due to the effects of global warming.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Rainier National Park Washington
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ALBERT B. FALL. SECRETARY NATIONAL PARK SERVICE STEPHEN T. MATHER, DIRECTOR RULES AND REGULATIONS MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK WASHINGTON Photograph by Frank A. Jacobs MOUNT RAINIER FROM THE VERANDA OF PARADISE INN 1923 Season from June 1 5 to September I 5 PARADISE INN, IN BEAUTIFUL PARADISE VALLEY. Note the wild flowers In the foreground. MOUNT RAINIER, SHOWING BEGINNING OF NISQUALLY GLACIER. THE NATIONAL PARKS AT A GLANCE. [Number, 19; total area, 11,372 square miles.] Area in National parks in Location. square Distinctive characteristics. order of creation. miles. Middle Arkansas U '40 hot springs possessing curative properties- 1832 Many hotels and boarding houses—20 bath­ houses under public control. Yellowstone Northwestern "Wyo­ 3, 348 More geysers than in all rest of world together— 1872 ming. Boiling springs—Mud volcanoes—Petrified for­ ests—Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone, re­ markable for gorgeous coloring—Large lakes- Many large streams and waterfalls—Vast wil­ derness, greatest wild bird and animal pre­ serve in world—Exceptional trout fishing. Middle eastern Cali­ 252 The Big Tree National Bark—Several hundred 1890 fornia. sequoia trees over 10 feet in diameter, some 25 to 30 feet in diameter—Towering mountain ranges—Startling precipices—Mile-long cave of delicate beauty. Yoscmitc Middle eastern Cali­ 1,125 Valley of world-famed beauty—Lofty cliffs—Ro­ 1S90 fornia. mantic vistas—Many waterfalls of extraor­ dinary height—3 groves of big trees—High Sierra—Waterwhecl Falls—Good trout fishing. Middle eastern Cali­ 4 Created to preserve the celebrated General Grant 1890 fornia. Tree, 35 feet in diameter—0 miles from Sequoia National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • A Witness to Death Fatalities in Mount Rainier National Park
    A WITNESS TO DEATH “In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks.” —John Muir No one knows if the great naturalist was talking about Mount Rainier, but he easily could have been. Majestic peaks, MOUNT RAINIER breathtaking waterfalls, the forest, the trails—Mount Rainier is a gift that never ceases to amaze. FATALITIES IN MOUNT RAINIER NATIONAL PARK, WASHINGTON JANUARY 1, 1897, TO PRESENT (Points represent an individual fatality.) But as quick as it is to give, it is even quicker to take away. Since 1897, and without passion or prejudice, Mount CRYSTAL MOUNTAIN Rainier has taken approximately 390 souls. So whether you AIRPLANE ALTITUDE ASPHYXIATION ASTHMA BEE STING CAPSIZED EXPLOSION EXPOSURE FALL see it as your weekend playground, your home, or your HEART ATTACK HOMICIDE ICE/SNOW MOTOR VEHICLE OTHER/ TREE FELL ROCKFALL SUICIDE ever-distant backdrop, Mount Rainier requires that you never AVALANCHE ACCIDENT UNKNOWN take it for granted. CARBON RIVER ENTRANCE STANLEY L. QUANDE FEBRUARY 24, 2007 Quande was CHENUIS killed in a snow MOUNTAIN avalanche near STEPHEN FLOE Crystal Mountain ISPUT CREEK JUNE 4, 1957 while skiing out FRANCES A. BLAKELY A falling tree crushed the car containing of bounds. ROBERT D. BLAKELY JASON A. RUSSELL Floe and two other occupants. MARCH 19, 2007 KENT SWANSON SEPTEMBER 12, 2010 While on a hike, Frances fell MARCH 24, 2000 Russell fell into a river and drowned into Isput Creek. Her husband, Swanson died of a heart attack while on a day hike in the park. Robert, attempted to save her, while hiking. CPR was performed but they both drowned.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Rainier National Park Visitor Study Summer 2012
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Mount Rainier National Park Visitor Study Summer 2012 Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/EQD/NRR—2013/376 ON THE COVER Small pond in the Tatoosh Range, Mount Rainier National Park Photograph courtesy of Mount Rainier National Park Mount Rainier National Park Visitor Study Summer 2012 Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/EQD/NRR—2013/376 Manni, M. F., Yen Le, Steven J. Hollenhorst Visitor Services Project Park Studies Unit College of Natural Resources University of Idaho 875 Perimeter Drive MS 1139 Moscow, ID 83844-1139 November 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado Mount Rainier National Park – VSP Visitor Study 259 August 4–10, 2012 The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. Data in this report were collected and analyzed using methods based on established, peer- reviewed protocols and were analyzed and interpreted within the guidelines of the protocols.
    [Show full text]