Sydney Opera House Forecourt Excavation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sydney Opera House Forecourt Excavation Sydney Opera House Forecourt Excavation Historical Archaeological Assessment and Management Plan Report prepared for Sydney Opera House June 2018 Sydney Office Level 6 372 Elizabeth Street Surry Hills NSW Australia 2010 T +61 2 9319 4811 Canberra Office 2A Mugga Way Red Hill ACT Australia 2603 T +61 2 6273 7540 GML Heritage Pty Ltd ABN 60 001 179 362 www.gml.com.au GML Heritage Report Register The following report register documents the development and issue of the report entitled Sydney Opera House Forecourt Excavation—Historical Archaeological Assessment and Management Plan, undertaken by GML Heritage Pty Ltd in accordance with its quality management system. Job No. Issue No. Notes/Description Issue Date 18-0311 1 Draft Report 25 May 2018 18-0311 2 Final Report 22 June 2018 Quality Assurance GML Heritage Pty Ltd operates under a quality management system which has been certified as complying with the Australian/New Zealand Standard for quality management systems AS/NZS ISO 9001:2008. The report has been reviewed and approved for issue in accordance with the GML quality assurance policy and procedures. Project Manager: Dr Tim Owen Project Director & Reviewer: Abi Cryerhall Issue No. 2 Issue No. 2 Signature Signature Position: Senior Associate Position: Senior Associate Date: 22 June 2018 Date: 22 June 2018 Copyright Historical sources and reference material used in the preparation of this report are acknowledged and referenced at the end of each section and/or in figure captions. Reasonable effort has been made to identify, contact, acknowledge and obtain permission to use material from the relevant copyright owners. Unless otherwise specified or agreed, copyright in this report vests in GML Heritage Pty Ltd (‘GML’) and in the owners of any pre-existing historic source or reference material. Moral Rights GML asserts its Moral Rights in this work, unless otherwise acknowledged, in accordance with the (Commonwealth) Copyright (Moral Rights) Amendment Act 2000. GML’s moral rights include the attribution of authorship, the right not to have the work falsely attributed and the right to integrity of authorship. Right to Use GML grants to the client for this project (and the client’s successors in title) an irrevocable royalty-free right to reproduce or use the material from this report, except where such use infringes the copyright and/or Moral Rights of GML or third parties. GML Heritage Contents Page 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Preamble ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Understanding the Project ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Heritage Background for the Current Assessment .................................................................................... 1 1.2.1 Sydney Opera House Conservation Management Plan ..................................................................... 2 1.2.2 GML 2010 ............................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2.3 GML 2016 ............................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Aboriginal Heritage and Archaeology .......................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Structure of this Report ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.5 Authorship ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 Historical Background ................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Historical Summary....................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.1 Bennelong Point ..................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Site Formation and Disturbance .................................................................................................................. 6 2.2.1 Land Reclamation .................................................................................................................................. 7 2.2.2 Modification to Ground Levels .............................................................................................................. 7 2.2.3 Sydney Opera House Construction ...................................................................................................... 8 2.2.4 VAPS Works .......................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.5 Geotechnical Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Summary of Site Formation and Disturbance .......................................................................................... 10 3.0 Archaeological Assessment of Potential and Integrity ......................................................................... 25 3.1 Assessment of Archaeological Potential ................................................................................................... 25 3.2 Summary of Archaeological Potential ....................................................................................................... 27 4.0 Heritage Significance Assessment ........................................................................................................... 29 4.1 Assessment of Historical Archaeological Potential .................................................................................. 29 4.1.1 Assessment of Research Potential—Bickford and Sullivan’s Questions ........................................ 29 4.1.2 Prior Heritage Assessment ................................................................................................................. 30 4.1.3 Current NSW Heritage Assessment ................................................................................................... 31 4.2 Summary of Significance of Site Features ................................................................................................ 33 4.2.1 Statement of Historical Archaeological Significance ......................................................................... 34 5.0 Archaeological Impact Statement ............................................................................................................. 36 5.1 The Proposed Works .................................................................................................................................. 36 5.2 Evaluation of Impacts on the Potential Archaeological Resource ........................................................... 36 5.2.1 Statement of Archaeological Impact ................................................................................................... 36 5.3 Recommended Mitigative Strategy ........................................................................................................... 36 6.0 Archaeological Research Design and Excavation Methodology ........................................................ 39 6.1 Method of Construction .............................................................................................................................. 39 6.2 Historical Themes and Research Questions ............................................................................................ 40 6.2.1 Historical Themes ................................................................................................................................ 40 6.2.2 Site-Specific Research Framework .................................................................................................... 40 Sydney Opera House, Forecourt Excavation—Historical Archaeological Assessment and Management Plan, June 2018 GML Heritage 6.3 Archaeological Investigations .................................................................................................................... 41 6.4 Recording ................................................................................................................................................... 42 6.5 Artefacts and Samples .............................................................................................................................. 42 6.6 Post-Excavation Report ............................................................................................................................. 43 6.7 Archaeological Team ................................................................................................................................. 44 Sydney Opera House, Forecourt Excavation—Historical Archaeological Assessment and Management Plan, June 2018 GML Heritage 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Preamble As part of the Sydney Opera House (SOH) forecourt works, a thrust block needs to be installed within the forecourt area. The project was approved as State Significant Development
Recommended publications
  • Response to Research Design
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION CONSERVATORIUM SITE MACQUARIE STREET, SYDNEY VOLUME 2 : RESPONSE TO RESEARCH DESIGN for NSW DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & SERVICES JULY 2002 CASEY & LOWE Pty Ltd Archaeology & Heritage _________________________________________________________________ 420 Marrickville Road, Marrickville NSW 2204 Tel: (02) 9568 5375 • Fax: (02) 9572 8409 • E-mail: [email protected] 1 Chapter 11: Research Design 11.0 Research Design The Meaning of the Archaeological Evidence The detailed interpretation of the archaeological evidence is found in the following chapters 12 to 16. This is where the research significance of the archaeology is explored and revealed, giving its meaning within a theoretical and social context. The main research questions that the archaeological evidence allows us to address are:1 1. Pre-European environment (Chapter 12) Evidence pertaining to the topography, geomorphology, vegetation etc. of this site prior to colonisation may contribute to research in the environmental history of the Sydney region, Aboriginal land management practices, historical ecology etc. 2. Remaking the landscape (Chapter 13) The Conservatorium site is located within one of the most significant historic and symbolic landscapes created by European settlers in Australia. The area is located between the sites of the original and replacement Government Houses, on a prominent ridge. While the utility of this ridge was first exploited by a group of windmills, utilitarian purposes soon became secondary to the Macquaries’ grandiose vision for Sydney and the Governor’s Domain in particular. The later creations of the Botanic Gardens, The Garden Palace and the Conservatorium itself, re-used, re-interpreted and created new vistas, paths and plantings to reflect the growing urban and economic importance of Sydney within the context of the British empire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concert in the Australian Bush Was Already Going Strong When
    Three Days in While the acoustics of the bush may not be as fine-tuned as those of the Sydney Opera House, the outdoor chorus played up the interconnectivity of SYDNEY music and nature much like a performance of John Cage’s 1972 composition, ‘Bird Cage’. The avant- The concert in the Australian bush was garde composer pioneered indeterminacy in music already going strong when we arrived. and described the need for a space in which “people are free to move and birds to fly.” Easy to do when By Monica Frim there’s not a bad seat in the bush. All you have to do Visitors aboard the Photography by John and Monica Frim Skyway thrill to is show up. 360-degree views of Enter Blue Mountains Tours, a family–owned the Jamison Valley Magpies warbled and trilled, mynah birds whistled and wailed, white crested as they glide toward cockatoos screeched out a raucous chorus from their various perches—picnic tables, company headed by Graham Chapman that picks up Scenic World in the day-trippers from their hotels in Sydney and takes Blue Mountains of eucalyptus trees and even the patchy grass at our feet. Kookaburras joined in New South Wales. them on small-group tours to the Blue Mountains. with their laughter, while we, a motley troop of wayfarers from various parts of Only 40 miles west of Australia’s capital city, the world, tucked into an Aussie bush breakfast of fried eggs and ham in a bun. Blue Mountains National Park is part of the Blue Nature’s open air concert hall permitted food but it came with peril: thieving birds Graham Chapman of Blue Mountains Tours, poses with that brazenly swooped and swiped at the provisions in our hands, the sounds of a kangaroo in the background during a bush walk in the Blue Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • SYDNEY OPERA HOUSE TM Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    SYDNEY OPERA HOUSE TM Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Booklet available in English on Heft in deutscher Sprache erhältlich auf Livret disponible en français sur Folleto disponible en español en Folheto disponível em português em A füzet magyarul ezen a honlapon olvasható: Architecture.LEGO.com www.sydneyoperahouse.com 21012_BI.indd 1 13/10/2011 12:08 PM SYDNEy OpERa HOUSE™ Sydney Opera House is a masterpiece of late The massive concrete sculptural shells that form modern architecture and an iconic building of the 20th the roof of Sydney Opera House appear like billowing century. It is admired internationally and proudly treasured sails filled by the sea winds with the sunlight and cloud by the people of Australia. It was created by a young shadows playing across their shining white surfaces. Danish architect, Jørn Utzon (1918-2008), who understood Utzon envisaged it as being like to a Gothic cathedral the potential provided by the site against the stunning that people would never tire of and never be finished with. backdrop of Sydney Harbour. Today Sydney Opera House does not operate solely as a venue for opera or symphony, but also hosts a wide range of performing arts and community activities. These include classical and contemporary music, ballet, opera, theatre, dance, cabaret, talks and large scale public programs. Since its opening in 1973 over 45 million people have attended more than 100 000 performances, and it is estimated that well over 100 million people have visited the site. It is one of Australia's most visited tourist attractions, being the most internationally recognized symbol of the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing the West Head of Sydney Cove
    GUNS, MAPS, RATS AND SHIPS Developing the West Head of Sydney Cove Davina Jackson PhD Travellers Club, Geographical Society of NSW 9 September 2018 Eora coastal culture depicted by First Fleet artists. Top: Paintings by the Port Jackson Painter (perhaps Thomas Watling). Bottom: Paintings by Philip Gidley King c1790. Watercolour map of the First Fleet settlement around Sydney Cove, sketched by convict artist Francis Fowkes, 1788 (SLNSW). William Bradley’s map of Sydney Cove, 1788 (SLNSW). ‘Sydney Cove Port Jackson 1788’, watercolour by William Bradley (SLNSW). Sketch of Sydney Cove drawn by Lt. William Dawes (top) using water depth soundings by Capt. John Hunter, 1788. Left: Sketches of Sydney’s first observatory, from William Dawes’s notebooks at Cambridge University Library. Right: Retrospective sketch of the cottage, drawn by Rod Bashford for Robert J. McAfee’s book, Dawes’s Meteorological Journal, 1981. Sydney Cove looking south from Dawes Point, painted by Thomas Watling, published 1794-96 (SLNSW). Looking west across Sydney Cove, engraving by James Heath, 1798. Charles Alexandre Lesueur’s ‘Plan de la ville de Sydney’, and ‘Plan de Port Jackson’, 1802. ‘View of a part of Sydney’, two sketches by Charles Alexandre Lesueur, 1802. Sydney from the north shore (detail), painting by Joseph Lycett, 1817. ‘A view of the cove and part of Sydney, New South Wales, taken from Dawe’s Battery’, sketch by James Wallis, engraving by Walter Preston 1817-18 (SLM). ‘A view of the cove and part of Sydney’ (from Dawes Battery), attributed to Joseph Lycett, 1819-20. Watercolour sketch looking west from Farm Cove (Woolloomooloo) to Fort Macquarie (Opera House site) and Fort Phillip, early 1820s.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern CBD Cable Project, Sydney Heritage Impact Assessment
    Eastern CBD Cable Project, Sydney Heritage Impact Assessment Prepared for Ausgrid October 2018 Document Control Page CLIENT: Ausgrid PROJECT: SYD18168 Eastern CBD Cable Project—Heritage Impact Assessment SITE NAME: Eastern CBD: Wentworth Avenue, College Street and Macquarie Street between Elizabeth Street and Shakespeare Place, Sydney EXTENT HERITAGE PTY LTD INTERNAL REVIEW/SIGN OFF WRITTEN BY DATE VERSION REVIEWED APPROVED Lorna Cooper Peter Douglas Ben Calvert 22 Aug 2018 Draft 22 Aug 2018 Anita Yousif Bridget San Miguel Lorna Cooper 24 Oct 2018 Final Anita Yousif 24 Oct 2018 Copyright and moral rights Historical sources and reference materials used in the preparation of this report are acknowledged and referenced in figure captions or in text citations. Reasonable effort has been made to identify, contact, acknowledge and obtain permission to use material from the relevant copyright owners. Unless otherwise specified in the contract terms for this, project Extent Heritage Pty Ltd: ° vests copyright of all material produced by Extent Heritage Pty Ltd (but excluding pre- existing material and material in which copyright is held by a third party) in the client for this project (and the client’s successors in title) ° retains the use of all material produced by Extent Heritage Pty Ltd for this project, for Extent Heritage Pty Ltd's ongoing business, and for professional presentations, academic papers, or publications. Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploration of Bennelong Point
    Australian history presentation using the interactive whiteboard An exploration of Bennelong Point Stage 2 Year 4 Syllabus outcome: ENS2.5 Describes places in the local area and other parts of Australia and explains their significance Indicators: - Significant natural, heritage and built features in the local area, NSW and Australia and their uses - Groups associated with places and features including Aboriginal people 1 2 3 4 5 Not quite Try Again 6 Not quite Try Again 7 Not quite Try Again 8 9 10 Not quite Try Again 11 WellDone!Youhavefound BennelongPoint 12 Time to take a trip in our.. 13 Welcome You have gone back in time to l l l l l l u u find yourself on the first fleet, P u P P to just before it arrived in Sydney Harbour. The captain has asked you to draw a map of what they are likely to expect when they 1788 reach harbour. Pullll Considering you are from 2012 and have an idea of what it looks like in present day... Createamapthatoutlineswhat SydneyHarbourcouldhavelookedlike in1788. 14 Whatwastherewhen Aboriginal small tidal island theyarrived? oyster shells The area currently known as Bennelong Point originally a _________________ that was scattered with discarded ___________ that had been collected by local ___________ women over hundreds of years. Also... These shells were soon gathered by early settlers and melted down to create lime for cement mortar which was used to build the two-story government house. 15 l l l Whoorwhatdoyouthinkwasthere l u u The Eora people, a group of indigenous Australians, P P lived in the region of Sydney cove.
    [Show full text]
  • 13.0 Remaking the Landscape
    12 Chapter 13: Remaking the Landscape 13.0 Remaking the landscape 13.1 Research Question The Conservatorium site is located within one of the most significant historic and symbolic landscapes created by European settlers in Australia. The area is located between the sites of the original and replacement Government Houses, on a prominent ridge. While the utility of this ridge was first exploited by a group of windmills, utilitarian purposes soon became secondary to the Macquaries’ grandiose vision for Sydney and the Governor’s Domain in particular. The later creations of the Botanic Gardens, The Garden Palace and the Conservatorium itself, re-used, re-interpreted and created new vistas, paths and planting to reflect the growing urban and economic importance of Sydney within the context of the British empire. Modifications to this site, its topography and vegetation, can therefore be interpreted within the theme of landscape as an expression of the ideology of colonialism. It is considered that this site is uniquely placed to address this research theme which would act as a meaningful interpretive framework for archaeological evidence relating to environmental and landscape features.1 In response to this research question evidence will be presented on how the Government Domain was transformed by the various occupants of First Government House, and the later Government House, during the first years of the colony. The intention behind the gathering and analysis of this evidence is to place the Stables building and the archaeological evidence from all phases of the landscape within a conceptual framework so that we can begin to unravel the meaning behind these major alterations.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Opera House (SOH) – Attended Construction Noise Measurements – 30Th November 2020
    Sydney Opera House (SOH) – Attended Construction Noise Measurements – 30th November 2020 Sydney Opera House Bennelong Point Report Reference: 20164 Sydney Opera House – Attended Construction Noise Measurements – 2020-11-30 - Revision 1 8 December 2020 Project Number: 20164 Version: Revision 1 Sydney Opera House 8 December 2020 Bennelong Point Revision 1 Sydney Opera House (SOH) – Attended Construction Noise Measurements – 30th November 2020 PREPARED BY: Pulse Acoustic Consultancy Pty Ltd ABN 61 614 634 525 Level 5, 73 Walker Street, North Sydney, 2060 Alex Danon Mob: +61 452 578 573 E: [email protected] www.pulseacoustics.com.au This report has been prepared by Pulse Acoustic Consultancy Pty Ltd with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the timescale and resources allocated to it by agreement with the Client. Information reported herein is based on the interpretation of data collected, which has been accepted in good faith as being accurate and valid. This report is for the exclusive use of Sydney Opera House No warranties or guarantees are expressed or should be inferred by any third parties. This report may not be relied upon by other parties without written consent from Pulse Acoustic. Pulse Acoustic disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the agreed scope of the work. DOCUMENT CONTROL Reference Status Date Prepared Checked Authorised 20164 Sydney Opera House – Attended Construction Final 8th December Alex Danon Alex Danon Matthew Harrison Noise Measurements – 2020-11-30 - Revision 1 2020 Pulse Acoustic Consultancy Pty Ltd Page 2 of 18 Sydney Opera House 8 December 2020 Bennelong Point Revision 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2 the Underfloor Assemblage of the Hyde Park Barracks
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sydney eScholarship 1 INTRODUCTION The Hyde Park Barracks is a landmark building of a joint investigation between the Historic Houses early colonial Sydney. Best known for its fine Georgian Trust (HHT) of New South Wales, the Archaeology architecture and its association with convicts, the Program at La Trobe University and the Australian Barracks has a complex history of occupation and Research Council (Crook et al. 2003). This work modification, and a rich archaeological legacy. It identified the great potential of the collection, and is the Barracks’ archaeological collection that is an adjunct project was launched in partnership with the focus of this book. When the last convicts were the Historic Houses Trust to expand and upgrade removed in 1848, the building entered a new phase, the original artefact catalogues. The result was the becoming, among other things, an Immigration first substantive monograph on the Barracks to Depot for young female migrants arriving from describe the archaeology of the underfloor collection the United Kingdom, and from 1862, an Asylum and place it within the context of archaeologies of for infirm and destitute women. These two groups the 19th century, institutionalisation, consumption of women occupied the Barracks until 1886, and and migration (Crook and Murray 2006). In 2008 over the years they lost, discarded and sometimes Davies and Murray began further work to complete concealed large quantities of debris and personal the re-cataloguing and contextual analysis of items in subfloor cavities. This material includes an artefacts, and create a consistent database for the extensive array of sewing equipment, clothing pieces, underfloor collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Ferry Safety Investigation Report Close Quarters Incident Involving Mv
    FERRY SAFETY INVESTIGATION REPORT CLOSE QUARTERS INCIDENT INVOLVING MV NARRABEEN AND BARQUENTINE SOUTHERN SWAN SYDNEY HARBOUR 17 MAY 2013 Released under the provisions of Section 45C (2) of the Transport Administration Act 1988 and 46BBA (1) of the Passenger Transport Act 1990 Investigation Reference 04603 FERRY SAFETY INVESTIGATION CLOSE QUARTERS INCIDENT INVOLVING MV NARRABEEN AND BARQUENTINE SOUTHERN SWAN SYDNEY HARBOUR 17 MAY 2013 Released under the provisions of Section 45C (2) of the Transport Administration Act 1988 and 46BBA (1) of the Passenger Transport Act 1990 Investigation Reference 04603 Published by: The Office of Transport Safety Investigations Postal address: PO Box A2616, Sydney South, NSW 1235 Office location: Level 17, 201 Elizabeth Street, Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: 02 9322 9200 Accident and incident notification: 1800 677 766 Facsimile: 02 9322 9299 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.otsi.nsw.gov.au This Report is Copyright. In the interests of enhancing the value of the information contained in this Report, its contents may be copied, downloaded, displayed, printed, reproduced and distributed, but only in unaltered form (and retaining this notice). However, copyright in material contained in this Report which has been obtained by the Office of Transport Safety Investigations from other agencies, private individuals or organisations, belongs to those agencies, individuals or organisations. Where use of their material is sought, a direct approach will need to be made to the owning agencies, individuals or organisations. Subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968, no other use may be made of the material in this Report unless permission of the Office of Transport Safety Investigations has been obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Amendments to Sydney Development Control Plan 2012 – Central Sydney Planning Strategy Amendment
    ATTACHMENT D ATTACHMENT D AMENDMENTS TO SYDNEY DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PLAN 2012 – CENTRAL SYDNEY PLANNING STRATEGY AMENDMENT Sydney2030 / Sydney Green / Global / Development Connected Control Plan 2012 Central Sydney Planning Strategy Amendment 2016 Sydney DCP 2012 – Central Sydney Planning Review Amendment Draft April 2013 1 Sydney DCP 2012 – Central Sydney Planning Review Amendment SYDNEY DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PLAN 2012 – CENTRAL SYDNEY PLANNING REVIEW AMENDMENT 1. The purpose of the Development Control Plan The purpose of this Development Control Plan (DCP) is to amend the Sydney Development Control Plan 2012 (SDCP2012), adopted by Council on 14 May 2012 and which came into effect on 14 December 2012. The draft provisions progress key planning controls proposed in the City of Sydney’s Central Sydney Planning Strategy (the Strategy). The provisions relate only to those matters to be contained in the SDCP2012, with supporting planning controls contained in the Central Sydney Planning Proposal which has been prepared concurrently with this DCP. For a more complete understanding of the land use and planning controls being proposed for Central Sydney, this draft DCP should be read in conjunction with the Planning Proposal, the Strategy, its technical appendices and other supporting documentation. The proposed provisions in this DCP constitute the initial phase of amendments to SDCP2012 and reflect the priority actions identified in the Strategy. 2. Citation This amendment may be referred to as the Sydney Development Control Plan 2012 – Central Sydney Planning Review Amendment. 3. Land Covered by this Plan This plan applies to land identified as ‘Central Sydney’ on the SLEP2012 Locality and Site Identification Map. This land is shown in pink in Figure I below.
    [Show full text]
  • Winds of Joy - Programs Manual Sydney
    Winds of Joy - Programs Manual Sydney www.sailorswithdisabilities.com [email protected] Tel: 0421 725 170 www.sailorswithdisabilities.com [email protected] Tel: 0421 725 170 2 Table of Contents Who and What is Sailors with disABILITIES? 3 About the Boat 4 Basic Knots 8 FIGURE OF EIGHT 8 REEF KNOT 9 BOWLINE 10 CLOVE HITCH 11 SHEET BEND 12 Glossary of Sailing Terms 13 What's on the Harbour 14 www.sailorswithdisabilities.com [email protected] Tel: 0421 725 170 3 Who and what is Sailors with disabilities? In 1994, Sailors with disabilities (SWD) was formed as a non-profit organization to offer people with disabilities the opportunity to go sailing. SWD is made up of a group of dedicated people, who love sailing and want to encourage others, no matter their abilities, to share their pleasure in the sport that is exhilarating, fun and challenging. SWD’s activities are aimed at helping people with a disability demonstrate their skills, dedication and commitment to achieving their goals. There are many levels of sailing that can be achieved and all sailors compete at the same level as the sea makes no allowances for anyone. Sailors with disabilities is committed to changing society's perception of people with disabilities, and the way they regard themselves by providing the tools to build confidence and self-esteem. Our vision is to take ownership of our circumstances and create vehicles to demonstrate what can be achieved. We are a not for profit organization which uses integrated sailing as a medium to deliver free programs to children with disability and disadvantaged youth, adults with disability and carers.
    [Show full text]