DOCSLIB.ORG

Hilu Paper (New)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hilu Paper (New) KEW BULLETIN 62: 355–373 (2007) 355 A century of progress in grass systematics Khidir W. Hilu1 Summary. This paper presents an overview of progress in grass systematics with a focus on the past century and assesses its current status and future outlook. In concert with systematic biology, progress in grass systematics has gone through some leaps caused by the introduction of new approaches or emphasis on existing ones. Chromosome cytology, anatomy and chemistry provided useful information, but major recent contributions have come from advances in bioinformatics and molecular biology. Consequently, grass systematics has moved from an initial intuitive classification and phylogenetics to one incorporating analytical phenetic approaches, and culminating in the current stage of analytic phylogeny. As a result, a refined picture of grass phylogeny is emerging with good resolution at the base, but the tree lacks robustness in some places such as the monophyly of the “BEP” subfamilies and the relationships within the PACCAD clade. Systematic structure of a number of subfamilies is better understood now, but further studies are needed. With the rapid advancement in molecular systematic and bioinformatic tools, and in conjunction with a wealth of literature available on structural characters, a more refined picture of grass taxonomy and evolution is expected. However, caution needs to be exercised in our interpretations to avoid hasty decisions that can translate into regress rather than progress. This is an exciting time in the history of grass systematics and, undoubtedly, is a period of collaborative rather than individual effort. Key words. Poaceae, grasses, systematics, phylogenetics, history, evolution. Introduction valuable resources used in furthering our Although the c. 10,000 species in the Poaceae places it understanding of Poaceae systematics and in assessing as the fifth largest flowering plant family, a number of the mode and tempo of grass evolution. biological features raise it to a unique position. The Development of our views of grass systematics family has contributed crop species that provide followed major trends in advancement in the sciences about 80% of the annual global food (FAOSTAT and engineering. Major discoveries come in spurts 1999). In fact, four of the top crops that feed the and are usually followed by periods of relative world are cereal crops: wheat, rice, corn, and barley. stagnation. Optical development associated with This economic significance is matched by an microscopes provided a closer look at various ecological dominance as grasses cover about one fifth anatomical features; advancement in chemical of the earth (Shantz 1954). Grasslands are signature techniques revealed information on a number of of the Poaceae. Because of this economic and molecules such as flavonoids, proteins and alkaloids; ecological importance, grasses have attracted development of computers and various analytical considerable attention in the biological and software programs enhanced the capability of agricultural sciences. The past century showed handling large data sets and facilitated large-scale enormous amounts of research conducted on various analyses of available grass data; and finally, the biological aspects of the family, including systematics, current advancement in molecular biology and genetics, cytogenetics, breeding, physiology, anatomy, biotechnology provided us with the tools to look at developmental biology, chemistry, chromosome information derived from genes and genomes. structure, and, more recently, whole plastid and Parallel to, or as a consequence of, these major nuclear genome sequences. Results from these developments, the field of grass systematics underwent studies have provided a wealth of information on the a series of refinements that individually or collectively biology of the family, which have become and remain corresponded to the progressive stages cited above. Accepted for publication November 2006. 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, U.S.A. Phone: 1-540 231 6407; Fax: 1-540 552 9307; e-mail: [email protected] © The Board of Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 2007 356 KEW BULLETIN VOL. 62(3) These stages of progress in grass systematics, although Adanson’s (1763) division of the grass family into not necessary sharply distinct, are in general quite several “sections.” Outstanding contributions during recognizable and can be divided into two major that period included the allocation by Robert Brown periods, which in turn can be further divided into sub- (1814) of grass genera into the tribes “Panicaceae” and periods. The two main periods are the Predictive “Poaceae” (probably equivalent to what was later Period and the Analytical Period. These two periods recognized as subfamilies Panicoideae and the differ in the means by which hypotheses on grass traditional Festucoideae) based on detailed systematics are put forth. In the Predictive Period, understanding of spikelet structure. This system was taxonomic hypotheses were based on personal followed to a certain degree by Bentham (1881), and perceptions using available knowledge in the field and became the basis of the classification of Hitchcock personal conviction of the systematist. In the Analytical and Chase (1950) of the North American grasses into Period, hypotheses are based on analyses of available the subfamilies Festucoideae and Panicoideae. Between data with preset mathematical formulae that have the 1673 and the 1950 publications, a number of eventually taken advantage of computing systems. This contributions were made in which the number of paper will address grass systematics in these two subfamilies ranged between two and three periods, summarize the overall progress to date, assess (summarized in Hilu & Wright 1982 and GPWG the areas that need further work, and highlight 2001). The recognition of the major subgroups was possible future trends and needs in grass systematics. based largely on type of inflorescence, spikelet number and floret disarticulation. The emergence of additional characters in grass Predictive Period in Grass Systematics systematics had an early start with the recognition in This period began with the first publication on the the nineteenth century of useful patterns in starch classification of grasses by Adanson (1763). The grain (see Hilu & Wright 1982 and GPWG 2001). This period included both the classification of grasses into information attracted the attention to the presence of subfamilies and tribes (Predictive Taxonomy) as well important traits besides morphology and encouraged as the assessment of evolutionary patterns for the further work on these same traits or others by a new taxonomic units (Predictive Phylogeny). Although generation of researchers, ultimately leading to the two approaches overlap completely in time, it significant advances in grass systematics. These new would be best to address them separately. lines of research included (but were not necessarily limited to) microscopic features, chromosome Predictive Taxonomy cytology, leaf and stem anatomy, embryology, seedling Hilu & Wright (1982) recognized two stages in this type, photosynthetic pathways, seed storage protein, period, an initial stage that relied solely on flavonoid chemistry (see literature review in Hilu & morphological characters, and a second stage that Wright 1982; Clayton & Renvoize 1986; GPWG 2001). gradually incorporated microscopic structures and The Predictive Period began with what seems to be biochemical features. The initial stage started with simplistic view of grass classification and moved into Table 1. Selected taxonomic treatments of the Poaceae at higher taxonomic levels to represent the overall history and the various periods discussed here. Brown (1814) classification of grasses into two tribes roughly corresponds to later treatments at the subfamily. Brown 1814 Avdulov 1931 Stebbins & Caro 1982 Clayton & GPWG 2001 Crampton (1961) Renvoize 1986 Paniceae Poatae Bambusoideae Bambusoideae Bambusoideae Anomochlooideae Poaceae Sacchariferae Oryzoideae Streptochaetoideae Oryzoideae Pharoideae Arundinoideae Anomochlooideae Pooideae Puelioideae Festucoideae Olyroideae Chloridoideae Bambusoideae Eragrostoideae Centhostecoideae Panicoideae Ehrhartoideae Oryzoideae Arundinoideae Pooideae Ehrhartoideae Centothecoideae Aristidoideae Phragmitoideae Chloridoideae Festucoideae Centothecoideae Eragrostoideae Panicoideae Aristidoideae Danthonioideae Panicoideae Arundinoideae Micrairoideae © The Board of Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 2007 A CENTURY OF PROGRESS IN GRASS SYSTEMATICS 357 Fig. 1. Trends in Poaceae subfamily recognition since Brown (1814) treatment of the family. the impressive effort of exploring potential Roshevits (1937) provided what he termed “a informative characters in the Poaceae. These system of origin of grasses” based on the two- contributions clearly underscored the artificiality of subfamily system (Poatae and Sacchariferae) of Avdulov the two or three subfamily systems and pointed out (1930). Within the two subfamilies, three “series” the need for substantial taxonomic revisions. As a were recognized for the Poatae (Series Bambusiformes, consequence, new subfamilies were recognized (Table Phragmitiformes, and Festuciformes) and two for the 1) with the number varying from three (Avdulov Sacchariferae (Paniciformes and Eragrostiformes). He 1931) to 13 (Caro 1982). The highlight of the period depicted the Poatae emerging from
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Bamboo Production to Consumption System in Cameroon
    WORKING PAPER The bamboo production to consumption system in Cameroon Verina Ingram Julius Chupezi Tieguhong Eric Maturin Nkamgnia Jean Paul Eyebe Mathew Ngawel WORKING PAPER 50 The bamboo production to consumption system in Cameroon Verina Ingram Julius Chupezi Tieguhong Eric Maturin Nkamgnia Jean Paul Eyebe Mathew Ngawel Working Paper 50 © 2010 Center for International Forestry Research All rights reserved Photos: Verina Ingram, Julius Chupezi Tieguhong, Ilse Pelkmans, Martin Lieber, Katrin Ingram Ingram, V., Tieguhong, J.C., Nkamgnia, E.M., Eyebe, J.P. and Ngawe, M. 2010 Bamboo production to consumption system, Cameroon. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia CIFOR Jl. CIFOR, Situ Gede Bogor Barat 16115 Indonesia T +62 (251) 8622-622 F +62 (251) 8622-100 E [email protected] www.cifor.cgiar.org Any views expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of CIFOR, the authors’ institutions or the financial sponsors of this publication. This study was financed by the International Network for Bamboo and Rattan (INBAR) as part of a Common Fund for Commodities project ‘Enhancing Opportunities for Market—Led Bamboo and Rattan-based Development in West and Central Africa’. A presentation of initial results was made at the International workshop in Yaoundé, Cameroon, 23-25 November 2009, organised by the (INBAR, the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) and the Ministry of Forests and Wildlife of the government of Cameroon. Contents INBAR’s bamboo and rattan development programme vi Abbreviations viii Acknowledgements ix Summary x 1. Introduction 1 Objectives 1 Rationale for the study 1 Background to Cameroon 1 Review of bamboo sector in Cameroon 5 Markets 15 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Poaceae: Bambusoideae) Christopher Dean Tyrrell Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2008 Systematics of the neotropical woody bamboo genus Rhipidocladum (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) Christopher Dean Tyrrell Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Tyrrell, Christopher Dean, "Systematics of the neotropical woody bamboo genus Rhipidocladum (Poaceae: Bambusoideae)" (2008). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 15419. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/15419 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Systematics of the neotropical woody bamboo genus Rhipidocladum (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) by Christopher Dean Tyrrell A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Program of Study Committee: Lynn G. Clark, Major Professor Dennis V. Lavrov Robert S. Wallace Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2008 Copyright © Christopher Dean Tyrrell, 2008. All rights reserved. 1457571 1457571 2008 ii In memory of Thomas D. Tyrrell Festum Asinorum iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT iv CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 Background and Significance 1 Research Objectives 5 Thesis Organization 6 Literature Cited 6 CHAPTER 2. PHYLOGENY OF THE BAMBOO SUBTRIBE 9 ARTHROSTYLIDIINAE WITH EMPHASIS ON RHIPIDOCLADUM Abstract 9 Introduction 10 Methods and Materials 13 Results 19 Discussion 25 Taxonomic Treatment 26 Literature Cited 31 CHAPTER 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maltese Islands: Climate, Vegetation and Landscape
    A revised version of this paper has been published as: Schembri, P.J. (1997) The Maltese Islands: climate, vegetation and landscape. GeoJournal 41(2): 115-125. THE MALTESE ISLANDS: CLIMATE, VEGETATION AND LANDSCAPE by Patrick J. Schembri Department of Biology University of Malta Msida MSD 06 MALTA Abstract The Maltese Islands, situated in the central Mediterranean, occupy an area of only some 316 km2. The climate is typically Mediterranean: the average annual rainfall is c.530mm of which some 85% falls during the period October to March; the mean monthly temperature range is 12-26°C, and the islands are very windy and sunny. Although small, the Maltese Islands have a considerable diversity of landscapes and ecosystems which are representative of the range and variety of those of the Mediterranean region. The islands are composed mainly of limestones, the soils are young and are very similar to the parent rocks, and there are no mountains, streams or lakes, but only minor springs; the main geomorphological features are karstic limestone plateaux, hillsides covered with clay taluses, gently rolling limestone plains, valleys which drain runoff during the wet season, steep sea-cliffs on the south-western coasts, and gently sloping rocky shores to the Northeast. The main vegetational assemblages are maquis, garigue and steppe; minor ones include patches of woodland, coastal wetlands, sand dunes, freshwater, and rupestral communities; the latter are the most scientifically important in view of the large number of endemic species they support. Human impact is significant. Some 38% of the land area is cultivated, c.15% is built up, and the rest is countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • Grass Genera in Townsville
    Grass Genera in Townsville Nanette B. Hooker Photographs by Chris Gardiner SCHOOL OF MARINE and TROPICAL BIOLOGY JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY TOWNSVILLE QUEENSLAND James Cook University 2012 GRASSES OF THE TOWNSVILLE AREA Welcome to the grasses of the Townsville area. The genera covered in this treatment are those found in the lowland areas around Townsville as far north as Bluewater, south to Alligator Creek and west to the base of Hervey’s Range. Most of these genera will also be found in neighbouring areas although some genera not included may occur in specific habitats. The aim of this book is to provide a description of the grass genera as well as a list of species. The grasses belong to a very widespread and large family called the Poaceae. The original family name Gramineae is used in some publications, in Australia the preferred family name is Poaceae. It is one of the largest flowering plant families of the world, comprising more than 700 genera, and more than 10,000 species. In Australia there are over 1300 species including non-native grasses. In the Townsville area there are more than 220 grass species. The grasses have highly modified flowers arranged in a variety of ways. Because they are highly modified and specialized, there are also many new terms used to describe the various features. Hence there is a lot of terminology that chiefly applies to grasses, but some terms are used also in the sedge family. The basic unit of the grass inflorescence (The flowering part) is the spikelet. The spikelet consists of 1-2 basal glumes (bracts at the base) that subtend 1-many florets or flowers.
    [Show full text]
  • Arundinelleae; Panicoideae; Poaceae)
    Bothalia 19, 1:45-52(1989) Kranz distinctive cells in the culm of ArundineUa (Arundinelleae; Panicoideae; Poaceae) EVANGELINA SANCHEZ*, MIRTA O. ARRIAGA* and ROGER P. ELLIS** Keywords: anatomy, Arundinella, C4, culm, distinctive cells, double bundle sheath, NADP-me ABSTRACT The transectional anatomy of photosynthetic flowering culms of Arundinella berteroniana (Schult.) Hitchc. & Chase and A. hispida (Willd.) Kuntze from South America and A. nepalensis Trin. from Africa is described and illustrated. The vascular bundles are arranged in three distinct rings, the outermost being external to a continuous sclerenchymatous band. Each of these peripheral bundles is surrounded by two bundle sheaths, a complete mestome sheath and an incomplete, outer, parenchymatous Kranz sheath, the cells of which contain large, specialized chloroplasts. Kranz bundle sheath extensions are also present. The chlorenchyma tissue is also located in this narrow peripheral zone and is interrupted by the vascular bundles and their associated sclerenchyma. Dispersed throughout the chlorenchyma are small groups of Kranz distinctive cells, identical in structure to the outer bundle sheath cells. No chlorenchyma cell is. therefore, more than two cells distant from a Kranz cell. The structure of the chlorenchyma and bundle sheaths indicates that the C4 photosynthetic pathway is operative in these culms. This study clearly demonstrates the presence of the peculiar distinctive cells in the culms as well as in the leaves of Arundinella. Also of interest is the presence of an inner bundle sheath in the vascular bundles of the culm whereas the bundles of the leaves possess only a single sheath. It has already been shown that Arundinella is a NADP-me C4 type and the anatomical predictor of a single Kranz sheath for NADP-me species, therefore, either does not hold in the culms of this genus or the culms are not NADP-me.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Subfamilial Classification of the Grasses (Poaceae) Author(S): Grass Phylogeny Working Group, Nigel P
    Phylogeny and Subfamilial Classification of the Grasses (Poaceae) Author(s): Grass Phylogeny Working Group, Nigel P. Barker, Lynn G. Clark, Jerrold I. Davis, Melvin R. Duvall, Gerald F. Guala, Catherine Hsiao, Elizabeth A. Kellogg, H. Peter Linder Source: Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, Vol. 88, No. 3 (Summer, 2001), pp. 373-457 Published by: Missouri Botanical Garden Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3298585 Accessed: 06/10/2008 11:05 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=mobot. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological, Anatomical, and Taxonomic Studies in Anomochloa and Streptochaeta (Poaceae: Bambusoideae)
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY NUMBER 68 Morphological, Anatomical, and Taxonomic Studies in Anomochloa and Streptochaeta (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) Emmet J. Judziewicz and Thomas R. Soderstrom SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS Washington, D.C. 1989 ABSTRACT Judziewicz, Emmet J., and Thomas R. Soderstrom. Morphological, Anatomical, and Taxonomic Studies in Anomochloa and Streptochaeta (Poaceae: Bambusoideae). Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, number 68,52 pages, 24 figures, 1 table, 1989.-Although resembling the core group of the bambusoid grasses in many features of leaf anatomy, the Neotropical rainforest grass genera Anomochloa and Streptochaeta share characters that are unusual in the subfamily: lack of ligules, exceptionally long microhairs with an unusual morphology, a distinctive leaf blade midrib structure, and 5-nerved coleoptiles. Both genera also possess inflorescences that are difficult to interpret in conventional agrostological terms. Anomochloa is monotypic, and A. marantoidea, described in 1851 by Adolphe Brongniart from cultivated material of uncertain provenance, was rediscovered in 1976 in the wet forests of coastal Bahia, Brazil. The inflorescence terminates in a spikelet and bears along its rachis several scorpioid cyme-like partial inflorescences. Each axis of a partial inflorescence is subtended by a keeled bract and bears as its first appendages two tiny, unvascularized bracteoles attached at slightly different levels. The spikelets are composed of an axis that bears two bracts and terminates in a flower. The lower, chlorophyllous, deciduous spikelet bract is separated from the coriaceous, persistent, corniculate upper bract by a cylindrical, indurate internode. The flower consists of a low membrane surmounted by a dense ring of brown cilia (perigonate annulus) surrounding the andrecium of four stamens, and an ovary bearing a single hispid stigma.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Phylogeny of Poaceae Based on Matk Gene Sequences
    Chapter 5 Phylogeny of Poaceae Based on matK Gene Sequences 5.1 Introduction Phylogenetic reconstruction in the Poaceae began early in this century with proposed evolutionary hypotheses based on assessment of existing knowledge of grasses (e.g., Bew, 1929; Hubbard 1948; Prat, 1960; Stebbins, 1956, 1982; Clayton, 1981; Tsvelev, 1983). Imperical approaches to phylogenetic reconstruction of the Poaceae followed those initial hypotheses, starting with cladistic analyses of morphological and anatomical characters (Kellogg and Campbell, 1987; Baum, 1987; Kellogg and Watson, 1993). More recently, molecular information has provided the basis for phylogenetic hypotheses in grasses at the subfamily and tribe levels (Table 5.1). These molecular studies were based on information from chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) restriction sites and DNA sequencing of the rbcL, ndhF, rps4, 18S and 26S ribosomal DNA (rDNA), phytochrome genes, and the ITS region (Hamby and Zimmer, 1988; Doebley et al., 1990; Davis and Soreng, 1993; Cummings, King, and Kellogg, 1994; Hsiao et al., 1994; Nadot, Bajon, and Lejeune, 1994; Barker, Linder, and Harley, 1995; Clark, Zhang, and Wendel, 1995; Duvall and Morton, 1996; Liang and Hilu, 1996; Mathews and Sharrock, 1996). Although these studies have refined our concept of grass evolution at the subfamily level and, to a certain degree, at the tribal level, major disagreements and questions remain to be addressed. Outstanding discrepancies at the subfamily level include: 1) Are the pooids, bambusoids senso lato, or herbaceous bamboos the
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Related to Whom?
    149 Who’s related to whom? Recent results from molecular systematic studies Elizabeth A Kellogg Similarities among model systems can lead to generalizations systematist’s question-why are there so many different about plants, but understanding the differences requires kinds of organisms? Studies of the evolution of develop- systematic data. Molecular phylogenetic analyses produce ment demand that the investigator go beyond the model results similar to traditional classifications in the grasses system and learn the pattern of variation in its relatives (Poaceae), and relationships among the cereal crops [3*]. This requires a reasonable assessment of the relatives’ are quite clear. Chloroplast-based phylogenies for the identity. Solanaceae show that tomato is best considered as a species of Solarium, closely related to potatoes. Traditional Knowledge of plant relationships has increased rapidly classifications in the Brassicaceae are misleading with in the past decade, reflecting partly the development regard to true phylogenetic relationships and data are only of molecular systematics. It has been known for some now beginning to clarify the situation. Molecular data are time that plant classifications do not reflect phylogeny also being used to revise our view of relationships among accurately, even though both phylogeny and classification flowering plant families. Phylogenetic data are critical for are hierarchical. The hierarchy of classification was interpreting hypotheses of the evolution of development. imposed in the late 18th century, well before ideas of descent with modification (evolution) were prevalent [4]. These pre-evolutionary groups were then re-interpreted in Address an evolutionary context, and were assumed to be products Harvard University Herbaria, 22 Divinity Avenue Cambridge, MA of evolution, rather than man-made artefacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Poaceae: Pooideae) Based on Plastid and Nuclear DNA Sequences
    d i v e r s i t y , p h y l o g e n y , a n d e v o l u t i o n i n t h e monocotyledons e d i t e d b y s e b e r g , p e t e r s e n , b a r f o d & d a v i s a a r h u s u n i v e r s i t y p r e s s , d e n m a r k , 2 0 1 0 Phylogenetics of Stipeae (Poaceae: Pooideae) Based on Plastid and Nuclear DNA Sequences Konstantin Romaschenko,1 Paul M. Peterson,2 Robert J. Soreng,2 Núria Garcia-Jacas,3 and Alfonso Susanna3 1M. G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, Tereshchenkovska 2, 01601 Kiev, Ukraine 2Smithsonian Institution, Department of Botany MRC-166, National Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, District of Columbia 20013-7012 USA. 3Laboratory of Molecular Systematics, Botanic Institute of Barcelona (CSIC-ICUB), Pg. del Migdia, s.n., E08038 Barcelona, Spain Author for correspondence ([email protected]) Abstract—The Stipeae tribe is a group of 400−600 grass species of worldwide distribution that are currently placed in 21 genera. The ‘needlegrasses’ are char- acterized by having single-flowered spikelets and stout, terminally-awned lem- mas. We conducted a molecular phylogenetic study of the Stipeae (including all genera except Anemanthele) using a total of 94 species (nine species were used as outgroups) based on five plastid DNA regions (trnK-5’matK, matK, trnHGUG-psbA, trnL5’-trnF, and ndhF) and a single nuclear DNA region (ITS).
    [Show full text]
  • Ornamental Grasses for the Midsouth Landscape
    Ornamental Grasses for the Midsouth Landscape Ornamental grasses with their variety of form, may seem similar, grasses vary greatly, ranging from cool color, texture, and size add diversity and dimension to season to warm season grasses, from woody to herbaceous, a landscape. Not many other groups of plants can boast and from annuals to long-lived perennials. attractiveness during practically all seasons. The only time This variation has resulted in five recognized they could be considered not to contribute to the beauty of subfamilies within Poaceae. They are Arundinoideae, the landscape is the few weeks in the early spring between a unique mix of woody and herbaceous grass species; cutting back the old growth of the warm-season grasses Bambusoideae, the bamboos; Chloridoideae, warm- until the sprouting of new growth. From their emergence season herbaceous grasses; Panicoideae, also warm-season in the spring through winter, warm-season ornamental herbaceous grasses; and Pooideae, a cool-season subfamily. grasses add drama, grace, and motion to the landscape Their habitats also vary. Grasses are found across the unlike any other plants. globe, including in Antarctica. They have a strong presence One of the unique and desirable contributions in prairies, like those in the Great Plains, and savannas, like ornamental grasses make to the landscape is their sound. those in southern Africa. It is important to recognize these Anyone who has ever been in a pine forest on a windy day natural characteristics when using grasses for ornament, is aware of the ethereal music of wind against pine foliage. since they determine adaptability and management within The effect varies with the strength of the wind and the a landscape or region, as well as invasive potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Viruses Virus Diseases Poaceae(Gramineae)
    Viruses and virus diseases of Poaceae (Gramineae) Viruses The Poaceae are one of the most important plant families in terms of the number of species, worldwide distribution, ecosystems and as ingredients of human and animal food. It is not surprising that they support many parasites including and more than 100 severely pathogenic virus species, of which new ones are being virus diseases regularly described. This book results from the contributions of 150 well-known specialists and presents of for the first time an in-depth look at all the viruses (including the retrotransposons) Poaceae(Gramineae) infesting one plant family. Ta xonomic and agronomic descriptions of the Poaceae are presented, followed by data on molecular and biological characteristics of the viruses and descriptions up to species level. Virus diseases of field grasses (barley, maize, rice, rye, sorghum, sugarcane, triticale and wheats), forage, ornamental, aromatic, wild and lawn Gramineae are largely described and illustrated (32 colour plates). A detailed index Sciences de la vie e) of viruses and taxonomic lists will help readers in their search for information. Foreworded by Marc Van Regenmortel, this book is essential for anyone with an interest in plant pathology especially plant virology, entomology, breeding minea and forecasting. Agronomists will also find this book invaluable. ra The book was coordinated by Hervé Lapierre, previously a researcher at the Institut H. Lapierre, P.-A. Signoret, editors National de la Recherche Agronomique (Versailles-France) and Pierre A. Signoret emeritus eae (G professor and formerly head of the plant pathology department at Ecole Nationale Supérieure ac Agronomique (Montpellier-France). Both have worked from the late 1960’s on virus diseases Po of Poaceae .
    [Show full text]